SpyGate
This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
============
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
============
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
=========
Chapter Twenty Two
“Justice is coming”
Political Lesson 101:
In any lawful country, the laws are effective when authorities enforce them and society submits.
But when the felons are the ones running the country, the government agencies and the Police — then you simply have a criminal enterprise in charge of a Totalitarian Dictatorship, and not a decent government in charge of a lawful country.
That is the difference between Obama and Hillary Clinton’s America, and today’s efforts by the new administration to return America to it’s roots of Laws and Constitutional Rights.
Capice?
Still in the transition period from the criminal Oligarchy of the Deep State elites, to the original Constitutional Republic, it’s good to have the people on your side as President Trump has.
But in an era where only the Friends and Family mattered under the Obama administration — it was only possible to advance and be saved having powerful corrupt friends in high places….
This is proven by the fact that Barry Obama’s name was scrubbed from the FBI investigation of the Hillary Clinton email scandal by the Comey FBI during the 2016 elections, and also Obama’s name was scrubbed from the FBI corruption report offered this past week from the Inspector General of the Department of Justice of these United States.
Why?
Why is Barry given a free pass again and again?
Hillary and Comey must know something about it.
Just ask Hillary Clinton, why was she let off the hook for her illegal classified email mishandlings?
And why was she let off the hook for her criminal carelessness with Classified information?
Could it be because Barack Hussein Obama was also involved in the same crimes, and in the same communications with her?
Just saying…
Because it was their other friend in a “high place,” James Comey, head of the FBI, who made sure to scrub Obama’s name from his final report so the American people wouldn’t know.
So please do tell me, how is that action, not a “politically motivated” one?
Political Lesson 102:
The Second aspect to this saga is here:
By now, you’ve probably heard about the IG report’s revelation of a previously-undisclosed text exchange between FBI lovebirds Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. Three months before the 2016 election, Page worriedly texted, “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok replied, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
(This would be a good place to insert: “But there’s no EVIDENCE of any bias!”)
Now, this raises a number of questions, but the most pressing is this:
- Why was that text that shows the full naked bias and political attack motivation to stage a Coup D’Etat “previously-undisclosed,” even to Congress?
- As part of their Constitutional oversight power, Congressional investigators demanded to see all the relevant FBI texts. Why was this not there?
- Yet they never saw this one until we all saw it yesterday. Why?
- I’m curious what top secret classified information would have been revealed by letting Congress see that unredacted?
- Unless letting cats out of bags harms national security, this is a worse cover up that Watergate ever was.
Thanks to a news dump last September, we knew that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was emailing back-and-forth with President Obama using her private email address routed through her homebrew server.
Anyway, please do not worry and don’t be concerned about national security breaches here, because Obama used a pseudonym that not even Huma Abedin knew, so it must all have been rather “secure” for the hackers to have a belly laugh…
That fact came up again Thursday with the release of the OIG report, but with a new twist. According to the report, crooked secretary Hillary Clinton “used her private email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries” but the fact that she was corresponding with then president Obama, was scrubbed from James Comey’s exoneration IG report.
Instead, oblique references to Obama were changed to “another senior government official” … and then even that bit was dropped from the final draft.
It would’ve been a shame to have dragged Barack Obama’s name into all of this, since his term in office was apparently “Scandal Free” and he was a “God of Truth” and a “Man of DisHonor” to boot…
Inspector General Michael Horowitz may have declined to confirm the cause-and-effect relationship between stunning anti-Trump bias at the FBI and the outcome of Hillary’s email case, but all the evidence of vicious partisanship is there in his report. He’s included what we already knew or suspected, but there’s much more. The FBI in 2016 was infected with bias. We can connect the incredibly obvious dots ourselves and come to our own conclusions about the motivation behind the FBI’s investigation of Trump and even the special counsel probe..
Of course, most major media will focus on the report’s mystifying conclusion without delving much deeper into its 568 pages. That’s because the deeper one goes, the more horrifyingly biased the culture of the FBI is shown to be.
If you thought the Strzok-Page texts provided evidence of bias, wait until you see the texts between another pair of FBI agents who were romantically involved (they’re now married). They’re identified in the report only as “Agent 1” and “Agent 5,” but we know they were directly involved in the Hillary investigation. Anyone looking at their texts and not concluding that “the fix was in” for Hillary is just refusing to accept the obvious.
“Agent 1” was one of just four agents assigned to the Hillary email case, and he, for one, did not want to interview her at all, thinking it was a “continued waste of resources and time and focus..” “I’m actually starting to have embarrassment sprinkled on my disappointment,” he instant-messaged to “Agent 5.” “Ever been forced to do something you adamantly opposed.”
Like Lisa Page, “Agent 1” believed that Hillary’s election was a foregone conclusion. After completing the interview with Clinton, “Agent 1” messaged “Agent 5” that he was “done interviewing the President.”
He also made it clear to “Agent 5” that he was “with her.” As in, “I’m With Her.”
When “Agent 5” complained to “Agent 1” about the “MYE” (Mid-Year Exam, the Hillary case) work she was having to do, “Agent 1” wrote back in a way that confirms what the political environment was like at the FBI. He referred to the Hillary investigation as “a case that doesn’t matter and is predestined.” He went on to say, “The DOJ comes in every once in a while and takes a wishy-washy, political, cowardice stance. “ “This is the environment love,” he tells her. “Can’t sugar coat it.” He advised her to just do the best she could.
When asked later by investigators about the case being “predestined,” he said he had no information about that. “Agent 1” also interviewed Hillary’s personal IT assistant. You’ll want to read the whole exchange, but when another FBI employee asked him how the interview went, “Agent 1” said, “Awesome. Lied his a– off.” The employee replied that “it would be funny if he was the only guy charged in this deal.” And in a testament to the way anti-Trumpers view Trump supporters, “Agent 5” texted “Agent 1” to say the ones in Ohio were “retarded.” She also wrote to him that if Hillary should lose, “I’m gonna be walking around with both of my guns…and likely quitting on the spot.”
In his report, Michael Horowitz admonished the FBI employees who had shown bias, saying that their conduct “had cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation. The damage caused by these employees’ actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence.
In other words, where do they go to get their reputation back? But the damage goes far beyond the FBI’s reputation. We know that the Hillary investigation was deliberately botched. This goes to the nature of the whole American system of justice –- the old-fashioned idea that Lady Justice is wearing a blindfold, not an “I’m With Her” button.
The Department of Justice inspector general report released today includes two elaborate charts mapping the volume of communications identified between FBI employees and members of the media in April, May, and October 2016…
But there is no chart explaining the use of the open email server by Obama as well as by Hillary Clinton since the two of them engaged in this open air conversation via email that was protected by the toilet, the shits, the pee, and the flush pan…
“We have profound concerns about the volume and extent of unauthorized media contacts by FBI personnel that we have uncovered during our review,” the report states.
Here’s “Attachment H” in the IG report.
The issue of FBI employees improperly disclosing non-public information, a.k.a. leaking tips to reporters, “raised considerable concerns,” according to investigators. They discovered a number of social interactions with reporters deemed inconsistent with FBI policy and department ethics rules.
“FBI employees received tickets to sporting events from journalists, went on golfing outings with media representatives, were treated to drinks and meals after work by reporters, and were the guests of journalists at nonpublic social events,” the report states.
Despite being able to track the number of times agents communicated with reporters, the IG cites two reasons for being unable to identify individual leakers.
First, we frequently find that the universe of Department and FBI employees who had access to sensitive information that has been leaked is substantial, often involving dozens, and in some instances, more than 100 people. We recognize that this is a challenging issue, because keeping information too closely held can harm an investigation and the supervision of it. Nevertheless, we think the Department and the FBI need to consider whether there is a better way to appropriately control the dissemination of sensitive information.
Then there’s this:
Second, although FBI policy strictly limits the employees who are authorized to speak to the media, we found that this policy appeared to be widely ignored during the period we reviewed. We identified numerous FBI employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters. The large number of FBI employees who were in contact with journalists during this time period impacted our ability to identify the sources of leaks.
The IG’s stated takeaway from the discovered leaks is a needed change in the FBI’s apparent cultural attitude. They recommended that the FBI “evaluate whether (a) it is sufficiently educating its employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules, and (b) its disciplinary penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.”
Atlas Shrugged in real life is the recent example of the GOJ releasing its white-washing IG report that is an immodest if not impudent attempt at clearing the sins of the FBI and DOJ by airing the most “innocent” and yet glaring examples of malfeasance, and thus hiding the biggest crimes of those at the top.
Barry is behind al of this when he tried to construct a street gang, like the Cripps and Bloods, or MS13, in order to keep governing for another term (a third) and this is just another example of the globalist leftist deep state conspiring with the Democratic party’s governing elite, while shrugging in the face of indisputable evidence of its own wrongdoing, and giving the American people the middle finger up high for all to see.
Sure — there are some bombshells inside the IG report that could be justifiably be called “nuclear bombs” but let’s remember that the Senate Intelligence Memo had the same weight and so had the Comey conference back in July 2016, and all the revelations that you’ve been seeing in this book, SpyGate, where the evidence gets exposed drip by painful drip…
Here at the offices of the book SpyGate the evidence the Coup D’Etat against our country is sorted in piles and then it’s actually identified as nuclear or as conventional. Certainly all of it is incendiary bomb material, but some bombs are far worse than others. We even have a category titled ICBM, and a neutron bomb. And this is the case with the BoyScout-nut job Comey’s presser when he back in 2016, when he laid out an utterly devastating case against the Madame Hill who was running the Obama bordello from inside the White House.
Even silly comedy boy Comey, had correctly identified and highlighted in damning detail some of the most notorious Crooked Hillary litany of crimes, that seemed to go unseen, undiagnosed and unserved, by Lady Justice.
Any single one of Hillary’s multitude of crimes would have consigned you, me, or anyone else, who is not part of the Democratic party’s elite, or of the Deep State swamp, to a lifelong free stay with breakfast and TV in the Federal hostel for the troubled souls…
And yet, that boy-scout from Hell, little errant boy Comey — concluded his lengthy summation with, “But never mind” the crimes, the empty pantsuit is just an old alcoholic hag, and we must give her a break…
This is how the FBI has managed to transform its image now, and the Inspector General’s report was the bureaucratic self-policing equivalent of Lavrentiy Beria’s indictment of Commissar Lavrentiy Beria, head of the KGB, when he censured himself to spending a day without his whores. This was the daylight hours only and he resumed his whore-mongering during that same night. He was obviously a religious man seeing as he respects that a “Hail Mary” goes a long way… to expunge his sins of sending millions to their unwarranted deaths, and many more to their Siberian exile.
During the recent spin cycle news conference, current FBI boss Christopher Wray spent a surprising amount of time boasting about the quality of his FBI honors interns. Great. Put one of them in charge. He, she, or knowing the current liberal culture of the FBI, xe, can’t do any worse than Comey and his posse of broken fragile snowflakes and buttercups.
Wray’s FBI, a ruined agency at best, conspired to undo the results of an election to ensure that the liberal politician who wouldn’t derail their gravy train would take office.
Now, these bureaucratic superstars are claiming that they will fix their agency because they will be finally getting some training to “learn” that trying to use their power as federal law enforcement agents to swing an election to their preferred political party is wrong.
Apparently, that message was previously unclear… to these lawfully abiding agents of the federal bureaucracy.
The 568-page report by U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz entitled “A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election” is seen shortly after its release in Washington, U.S. June 14, 2018.
Congress isn’t done with the Hillary Clinton email investigation of 2016, despite an independent watchdog report that found no political bias by the FBI or Department of Justice in how the case was handled.
Even before the 568-page report was released on Thursday, the Senate and House judiciary committees had scheduled hearings to question the report’s author – Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz – about his findings. FBI Director Christopher Wray also is set to testify before the Senate panel, because despite the widespread bipartisan praise for Horowitz from Congress, some House Republicans have challenged his conclusions.
“The Inspector General report confirms that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton received special treatment from the Obama Justice Department during its investigation of her use of a private email server,” House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said. “The Justice Department and FBI didn’t treat her like any other criminal suspect and didn’t follow standard investigative procedures.”
But Horowitz’s report did not find any bias in favor of Clinton. The report concluded that former FBI Director James Comey broke FBI and Justice Department protocol in his handling of the 2016 investigation of Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state for President Barack Obama.
But it also said that Comey was not motivated by political bias when he cleared Clinton of criminal wrongdoing.
Instead, the report blasted Comey for being “insubordinate” by holding a news conference to discuss the Clinton case publicly without telling his bosses in the Justice Department what he was going to do. The report also said that it is not normal practice for an FBI director to go into detail about a case when no charges are being filed.
“While we did not find that these decisions were the result of political bias on Comey’s part, we nevertheless concluded that by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the department as fair administrators of justice,” Horowitz wrote in the report that House Republicans are using the report to renew their push for a second special counsel to investigate how the FBI and DOJ handled the Clinton email inquiry, the same subject Horowitz looked into for 18 months. There already is a special counsel, Robert Mueller, leading a separate investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.
“The (FBI) agents on the ground and all Americans throughout our exceptional country deserve a Justice Department that upholds the rule of law and not an agency run amuck by senior staff who engage in widespread and highly problematic misconduct, including partisan, political biases overcoming the need for sound objectivity and good judgment,” said Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., lead sponsor of a resolution to appoint a special counsel to investigate “gross misconduct” at the highest levels of the FBI and DOJ.
Some GOP leaders also are seizing on Horowitz’s revelations about anti-Trump text messages between two FBI officials to call for more congressional investigations. While Horowitz didn’t find political bias by Comey, he did uncover more Trump-bashing texts from a pair of FBI officials who were involved in an extramarital affair.
The report says bureau lawyer Lisa Page wrote to counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok in a text message: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right?” In response, Strzok, who helped oversee the Clinton email investigation, wrote: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
Goodlatte announced on Thursday that he intends to subpoena Strzok to compel his testimony before the House judiciary and oversight committees. Page left the FBI last month, but Strzok still works for the bureau.
“One of the lead investigators texted he would ‘stop’ Trump from becoming President,” Goodlatte said, referring to Strzok. “These actions have tarnished the reputations of our nation’s top law enforcement agencies and have undermined Americans’ confidence in their justice system.”
Democrats say Republicans want to keep the controversy alive in large part to try to undermine Mueller’s Russia investigation and protect Trump.
“There are two facts incontrovertible and not subject to spin,” said Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. “One, Donald Trump won that election, so the complaints about the FBI and Jim Comey and all the rest don’t lead anywhere. At the end of the day, the actions reviewed in this report helped Donald Trump win the election, not the other way around.”
Schumer was referring to the fact that Comey told Congress he was reopening the Clinton email investigation just days before the election. Clinton and many Democrats believe Comey’s action may have cost Clinton the presidency, even though it didn’t result in any charges against her.
“Two,” Schumer said, “this report contains no evidence to make any reasonable person conclude that the special counsel investigation is anything other than independent, impartial and just as important today as it was before this report was issued.”
The same with the IG report. Yeah, the report demonstrated intense and pervasive political bias. Yeah, at every turn the FBI/DOJ hacks gave unprecedented deference and breaks to Hillary. Yeah, from the get-go they talked about how no one was ever going to be prosecuted. Nah, nothing to see.
It’s like a prosecutor laying out a crushing case to a jury, then saying, “And in conclusion, I’d like you to find the defendant not guilty.”
“No evidence,” concludes the IG report. It’s 500+ pages of evidence.
Let’s try a hypothetical. You are on a jury. My client is a black man claiming racial discrimination by his company. I present you with texts from key leaders in the company – who are still employed in high positions at the company – discussing how they hate black people. I demonstrate that at every single opportunity, the company made choices that hurt my client, just like at every opportunity the FBI and DOJ made choices to help Hillary the Harpy. Then, I show the company fired my client with no evidence of his wrongdoing, just like the FBI exonerated Stumbles O’Drunky with tons of evidence of her wrongdoing. Do you think I presented “no evidence?”
You, as a juror, have a choice – was my client discriminated against?
I, as a lawyer, also have a choice – Ferrari or Lamborghini?
The IG report sidestepped the most critical point, the one that is resulting in the American people losing their last remaining fragments of faith in our system, the fact that there are demonstrably two sets of rules, that there are two brands of justice in America.
There is one for you, me, and everyone else not in the elite – the infuriated, angry Normals. And there is another one for the elite.
I bet if you, me, or anyone else not in the elite were being prosecuted by the feds, the feds would be totally neutral regarding our politics, they would show us deference and give us breaks, and they would resolve from the beginning that we were going to walk. Let’s ask Scooter Libby or Dinesh De Souza or Conrad Black or Mike Flynn about that.
President Trump, you’ve already fixed the injustices suffered by Scooter and Dinesh. Pardon the other two guys. Pardon Conrad Black and General Mike Flynn. Show that this unAmerican, tyrannical garbage is unacceptable by refusing to accept it.
Hell, pardon everyone Robert Mueller and his team of Democrat operatives have ever even talked to. The report’s incoherent conclusion notwithstanding, it shows that this whole process is irredeemably tainted with political bias. Shut it down and let the voters decide if they want to validate injustice or not.
Our country cannot go on like this.
The rule of law matters, and the rule of law does not have exceptions that exempt preferred people and groups. We have tolerated this abomination long enough – it has to stop. Either the elite rediscovers its sense of duty and service and stops it, or we will stop it.
Donald Trump is our latest attempt to do that. If he is unable to do so, the elite is really going to hate what we try next.
Armed Revolution is coming and the elites will not enjoy it even a little bit. Just wait and see.
Surely you don’t expect the American people to allow them to get away with it all and to think that they scored another win?
Some have taken to calling our political/cultural response to this abandonment of the rule of law “tribalism.” And it is, because tribalism is the only alternative to the rule of law. Some like Jonah Goldberg rightly warn against the tribalist trend, and it is bad, but it sure beats the hell out of being the liberals’ serfs. Others are fussily upset that we choose uniting to protect ourselves over surrender – to them I say, if you Fredocons don’t like tribalism, then help us fix the freakin’ problem instead of trying to shut us up and pretending everything is groovy.
Yours,
Dr Churchill
PS:
Once again, here are the two, and only two, options for a Democracy and especially for a Constitutional Republic that is a Democracy:
The IG report, simultaneously a devastating indictment of elite misconduct and a total whitewash, is a symptom of the moral leprosy infecting our elite. It is rotting away our institutions, and the foundations of the United States as we knew it. But the elite can’t, or won’t, even admit to itself what we all see.
And this means the elite can’t, or won’t, do what is necessary to repair the damage the elite itself has caused our country.
No wonder the normal people are getting militant – and if the elites do not wake up to the danger, this country will be torn apart, or even worse.
The funky FBI guy Comey’s breakdance antics were almost funny, but that nut job has got to behave before he enters the place where the shop is on a rope to avoid being dropped in the floor of the shower, lest someone has to bend over to grab it…
If this is like a comedy of sorts – let me tell you that it’s not.
It’s a serious judgement against our Republic and the criminal incompetence of the weed smoking President Barry Loser Stoner Baked Obama.
Between that, and Comey’s incompetence along with the IG’s devastating whitewash report, we are … in a time of a terrifying blackballing of our Democracy.
Dr Churchill
Bleeding Edge 
Leave a Reply