Posted by: Dr Churchill | June 26, 2018

SpyGate (Chapter Twenty Nine)

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Twenty Nine
“Media Narrative is Segregation”

The Red Hen and the Peter Fonda incident of HATE and unbridled Trump Derangement Syndrome, have demonstrated amply that the virulent hate that leads the radical street mobs if organized like preparations for a new Civil War.

These foolish people seeking to segregate our society once again in a New Apartheid, are being egged on by a growing number of slightly more mainstream elected Democrat politicians and progressive candidates running for office as Democrats this fall who are also demanding an end to ICE. Abolish our Government is the Soviet style propaganda story by the Democratic party, headlined as “Abolish ICE” which is the new rallying cry for progressive Democrats.

Doing away with the immigration agency has become an issue left-wing insurgents can use to differentiate themselves from established party rivals in midterm primaries.

Fueled by outrage over the Trump administration’s immigration policies, a small but growing number of progressive Democratic candidates are signing onto a nascent effort to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

It’s a radical idea and one that was confined to the fringes just months ago in a party that has historically balanced calls for better treatment of migrants with support for stronger border security and enforcement.

But as an emboldened left challenges old assumptions about everything from health care to jobs, doing away with ICE has become the latest issue left-wing insurgents can use to differentiate themselves from more established rivals in Democratic primaries, especially as mainstream party candidates increasingly co-opt other contrast issues, like Medicare for All, and a $15 minimum wage.

The largest such actions is well into its second week in the leftist haven of Portland, Oregon, and it’s growing into a semi-permanent tent city of hundreds of radicals dedicated not only to frustrating ICE’s work but to totally abolishing the agency. The official Twitter account of the Portland effort is titled “Abolish I.C.E. PDX” and its banner photo reads “ICE = GESTAPO.”

This organized lawlessness is spreading to cities across the United States.

These ominous uprisings are taking various forms but the most visible and aggressive ones involve Antifa-style “occupy” socialist and anarchist street mobs dedicated to taking down ICE – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal government policing agency that is part of the Department of Homeland Security. The impetus for these actions has been the anti-President Trump Fake News psy-op meme that claims minor children of illegal immigrants arrested for crashing the U.S./Mexico border are being separated from their parents, sent to “Nazi”-like “concentration camps,” and systematically mistreated.

But it’s all about the News Media and the Social Media being the New Pravda of the Soviet Propaganda… Whereas the job of a journalist was to report facts, add context where necessary, and leave it to the consumer to decide what he thinks — today no one can deny that the mainstream media in the United States definitely has a left-leaning slant when it comes to reporting the news.

In a new video for Prager University, “American Media, Soviet Tactics,” James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas and author of “American Pravda,” addresses the increasingly partisan reporting of mainstream media outlets and the erosion of public trust in the fourth estate:

In this video above, James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas, explains why fewer and fewer American people trust modern-day “journalism.”

Because back in the glory days of Socialism under Stalin — the government of the former Soviet Union thought that by controlling access to information, they could keep their citizens in line. Consistent with the Orwellian nature of the Soviet Union, the country’s most important newspaper was Pravda. ‘Pravda’ is the Russian word for ‘truth.’

But Pravda was not truth.

Pravda, was full of lies.

So although everybody would read it — nobody believed it.

Kind-a-like the CNN that is broadcast all over the hotels and the airports of this world and everybody looks at it when in a waiting terminal, or in a hotel lobby — but nobody believes those talking heads droning on about shit they probably just make up…

But here’s the thing: Almost no one in the Soviet Union was fooled. They knew they were being lied to. Ironically, unlike most citizens in the Soviet Union, citizens in 21st-century America are fooled by their news media. Many of us, are fooled because we think we’re getting the real story from our major media, but we’re not. We are fooled because when we tune into the networks, or read the New York Times or the Washington Post, we’re actually getting a sharply slanted version of the news. A version of reality heavily slanted to the left. And since we don’t have any experience with the old Soviet Union or the tactics of totalitarian governments — we are fooled because we simply can’t believe that this could happen in America.

Yet this awful leftist slant and the editorializing of the News, should deeply concern people on both sides of the political divide. Because in order to make informed decisions, a free society needs a free press that it can trust — not one that is hopelessly biased. In 2017, Project Veritas sent out undercover reporters to see how committed the major media was to objective news gathering, specifically as it regarded the newly-elected president, Donald Trump. These undercover reporters, caught multiple employees at mainstream media outlets admitting to not only their personal left-leaning political bias but the bias of their organization and their news coverage, which is slanted to promote the progressive agenda instead of providing Americans the straight, unbiased news. When journalists shape news to fit their vision of a better society, they’re not doing their job, but are being stooges of propaganda.

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 12.12.50 PM


Of course it is the same story of leftist bias, with social media and internet searches, because this week, as the crisis at the border intensified and dominated headlines, mentions of abolishing ICE shot up on Google searches and Twitter as new candidates and activists groups jumped onto the bandwagon.

And the protesters who disrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen’s dinner at a Mexican restaurant this week in Washington yelled “abolish ICE!” and other slogans as they drove her from the restaurant.

Peter Fonda then tweeted that he wants to ‘rip Barron Trump from his mother’ and put him in a ‘cage with pedophiles’ and offered some other choice threats to the first family too.

Here are Peter Fonda’s recent tweets:


“SS (Sarah Sanders) is a lying gash, too. And “gash” is much worse than c**t. Maybe we should take her children away and deport her to Arkansas, and giving her children to Stephen Goebbels Miller for safe keeping.”


“Sounds great. We don’t have to take the agents kids, we only need to surround their schools and scare the shit out of them and worry the f**k out of the agents from CBE ICE & REGULAR BORDER PATROL AGENTS. WE NEED TO SCARE THE F**K OUT OF THEM! NEED TO MAKE THEIR CHILDREN WORRY NOW”


Yes, this is what passes for “inclusion, acceptance, kindness, feminism, gender equality, love and peace” in the world of so many liberals. The liberal leftist hypocrisy knows no bounds. How about the “Be Kind” stickers on cars and “Love Trumps Hate” motto that are so popular in liberal circles? Do those apply here? And the really hilarious part about Peter Fonda’s tweets encouraging domestic terrorism, is his avatar on Twitter flashing a “peace” sign.

Naturally the Secret Service got involved, and then the National Border Patrol Council went on and identified Peter Fonda (@iamfonda) as a ‘domestic terrorist’ after the actor advocated terrorizing agents’ children… and now Peter has been placed on a No Fly List, so whenever he wants to visit his ranch in Montana from his LA home, he bought to take a burro for the long walk North. Maybe the trekking on the back of an ass, will do him some good reconnecting him with his Democratic roots…

The Department of Homeland Security is now warning employees of an increased level of threat to their safety with a series of violent acts taken against them and their children due to the current debate over immigration policy.
In a letter sent to employees, the department said there is a “heightened threat against DHS employees,” according to ABC Radio.

“This assessment is based on specific and credible threats that have been levied against certain DHS employees and a sharp increase in the overall number of general threats against DHS employees,” Claire Grady, acting deputy secretary of Homeland Security, said in the letter.

Threats seem to have advanced well beyond mere talk. The department reported that one official living in Washington, D.C., found a decapitated and burnt animal carcass on his porch.

The threats come as some elected Democrat officials have engaged in extreme rhetoric against those with whom they disagree politically.

California Democrat Maxine Waters, for instance, urged followers to attack Trump administration officials and their children at their homes and public places like restaurants.

Democrat acolytes seem to have taken such suggestions to heart and have stepped up pressure on Republicans in a multitude of venues, including in private life. In the last few days, Trump Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was refused service in a Virginia restaurant, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was chased out of a D.C. Mexican restaurant, and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was harassed in a Movie theater.

Last year a Democrat operative who had worked for Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders went on a shooting rampage at a Virginia baseball park in an effort to kill Republican members of Congress. Several were wounded, including House Majority Whip, Republican Steve Scalise, who has been seriously and permanently crippled by the wounds.

And this whole Trump Derangement Syndrome is because of the Media’s obsession with telling lies against President Trump: THE MEDIA ACCUSES TRUMP OF ITS OWN CRIMES, but we all know that if the media wanted to investigate enemy collusion, it would look in the mirror, and examine it’s own self image, as Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism, writes:

“On Tom LoBianco’s LinkedIn profile, the former Associated Press reporter self-identifies as a “White House reporter covering Trump Russia probes.” At CNN, LoBianco writes that he “covered the 2016 presidential race and the Russia probes.”

Now LoBianco is in trouble for reasons having nothing and everything to do with the Russia probe.

Earlier this year, Elliot Broidy, a Trump ally and Republican fundraiser, was targeted by Qatari hackers. Broidy had been sharply critical of the terror state which has been linked to everything from 9/11 to Iran. And his emails were quickly peddled to media figures who spun them into pro-Qatari hit pieces.

When Broidy struck back with a lawsuit targeting Qatar and its lobbyists, phone records showed that LoBianco had spoken three dozen times to a registered foreign agent of the Islamic terror state.

LoBianco’s stories were nakedly hostile to Broidy, the Saudis and the UAE to the extent that they were hard to distinguish from Qatari propaganda. And they were aimed at what LoBianco and his collaborator deemed a “secret campaign” to “alter U.S. foreign policy and punish Qatar.” LoBianco’s story accused Broidy of not registering as a foreign agent, but he was the one allegedly colluding with a Qatari agent.

In his story, LoBianco wrote of a “cache of emails obtained by the AP.” The emails are described as having been “anonymously leaked.” A more factually accurate term would have been “hacked” or “stolen.” And LoBianco and the AP had no problem with posting these stolen emails online.

There was nothing unusual about that. Media organizations routinely publish stolen emails while describing them as ‘leaked’: a term associated with classified government or corporate documents, not stolen private correspondence. Like LoBianco’s stories, they emphasize the role of the news organization in “analyzing” the “documents” while evading the question of how they came into their possession.

Stolen emails have become typical tools of political warfare. But colluding with foreign agents and receiving stolen emails from foreign hackers is at the center of the Russiagate allegations. Yet the same reporter investigating Russiagate appeared to be involved in his own Qatargate. And he wasn’t alone.

The stolen emails were distributed to and written up by a variety of mainstream media outlets including the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg and the New York Times. The campaign against Broidy using stolen and altered emails was misleadingly described by LoBianco and other outlets as an investigation. But the investigation allegedly consisted of foreign agents handfeeding stolen emails to reporters. And then seemingly setting out a pro-Qatari and anti-UAE narrative that those reporters slavishly abided by.

And LoBianco went from writing up Dem claims that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russians on the hacked DNC emails to writing up hacked Republican emails from the Qataris. The New York Times and McClatchy claimed to have broken stories about Trump, Russia and the hacked emails. They also appear to have trafficked in emails stolen by Qatar to go after one of President Trump’s allies.

Now the hacks are the subject of an FBI investigation. And the interactions between the media and Qatari agents have become a crucial link in unraveling the motives behind the crime.

Whether the media has the right to collude with enemy nations and publish stolen emails in order to undermine American foreign policy is a serious question. But it certainly has no right to pursue an extended campaign to destroy an elected official over allegations of behavior that it engages in.

That is the typical double standard which the media left deploys against the political right. Its corrosive effects have leached ethics and integrity out of public life and replaced them with a zero sum game.

The entire trade in hacked emails, by domestic or foreign actors, only exists because of the media. Whether it’s Sarah Palin’s emails, the DNC emails, Broidy’s emails or Podesta’s emails, the practice wouldn’t exist without the collusion and complicity of media outlets with the hackers and their agenda.

If the media wants to investigate someone for colluding in email hacks, it can look in the mirror.

The media was eager to peddle the same stolen emails that it wants to blame on Trump. The Washington Post and ABC News are still cashing in on stories about the hacks garnished with lurid clickbait headlines like, “Here are the latest, most damaging things in the DNC’s leaked emails” and “The 4 Most Damaging Emails From the DNC WikiLeaks Dump”. Did Trump force them to run those stories?

To paraphrase Casablanca’s Captain Renault, “I am shocked to find that email hacking is going on here!”

What began with ‘whistleblowers’ passing government documents to reporters turned into the mainstream media launching a vigorous defense of Gawker publishing Hulk Hogan’s stolen sex tape. The distinction between journalists holding powerful institutions accountable by publishing documents that should have been public and humiliating anyone they don’t like by doxing them has entirely vanished.

The legitimacy, provenance and chain of custody of the stolen documents have also ceased to matter.

After the Broidy lawsuit, BuzzFeed published an outraged piece warning that Broidy’s lawsuit threatened the First Amendment and the confidentiality of sources. But the First Amendment and shield laws, were never meant to protect criminal activity. The media had been quick to argue that attorney-client confidentiality shouldn’t have protected Trump and Cohen for that reason. Yet the media still believes that shield laws should protect its criminal activity, including possible collusion with enemy states.

It’s the same old double standard.

The distinction between journalism and opposition research vanished some time ago. The Trump investigation was based on the work of FusionGPS, a smear shop run by former reporters that passed along its smears to reporters and government agencies alike while working for Hillary Clinton. The intersection of foreign and domestic actors in generating the Trump investigation has its echoes in Broidy’s case where foreign governments, lobbyists and hackers used the media to do their dirty work.

Like an iceberg, most of the media operates underwater. The fixers who feed and sometimes write the media’s stories are the invisible men and women of journalism. It takes subpoenas, like those of House Republicans or Elliot Broidy, to drag them out of the shadows of Manhattan and D.C. restaurants and into the glaring light of day. That’s what journalists used to do. Now it takes lawyers to expose them.

The media needs to decide whether colluding with enemy states and foreign hackers to influence American politics is a praiseworthy act or the worst form of treason imaginable. And then, instead of going back and forth whenever it’s politically convenient, it needs to pick one and stick with it.

That’s an unrealistic expectation in an age where all standards are politically relative. Sexual assault, racism and treason are all excused when practiced by a progressive. But it’s equally unrealistic of the media to think that it can bring down Trump with conspiracy theories about a crime that it’s guilty of.

The media has made a fortune accusing Trump of its own crimes. But as the FBI investigates the Broidy hack, the bill for the media’s hypocrisy may be coming due.”

And the Media can’t explain away their own culpability as we see one after another, all the crazy actresses decapitatinq Trump in effigy, we now have Cynthia Nixon of New York saying that: “I think we’ve come to a moment where we need to call for the abolishment of ICE.” This from an actress who was playing the real life lesbian friend of Carrie in “Sex & the City” and who is challenging New York Gov Andrew Cuomo in next week’s Democratic primary. Her boastful exaggeration was told to an audience in Brooklyn on Tuesday, where she failed to acknowledge that governors have zero influence, over the federal agency.

And since the actions of street demonstrators targeting ICE are being massively covered in the mainstream national media, it is necessary to also search local media, for juicy details on the actions that may have been published or been broadcast on the local level. It appears that the demonstrations in Portland, Oregon are the largest and are serving as a model for other radicals as the highly-organized and highly-motivated leftist forces who hope that their anti-law enforcement campaign catches fire, trends on social media, and spreads to other cities. A VICE headline about the Portland occupation is titled: “The Protesters Who Shut Down an ICE Facility Are Just Getting Started.”

The message comes from a shocking and obscene radical banner about an ongoing occupy action in New York City and is featured on the Portland Abolish I.C.E. PDX Twitter page. It calls for “no prisons no ICE no borders” and adds “chinga la migra” which translates as “f—k migra.” The word migra is a derogatory Spanish language slur for U.S. immigration officers often used by illegal immigrants.

In Portland, demonstrations began on Sunday June 17. Two days later, the crowds encamped outside the ICE building on 4310 SW Macadam Avenue, which they call a “prison,” were large enough to threaten federal government employees at the end of their work day as they tried to leave for home. Armed DHS officers were called in to escort employees safely from their facility as the mobs were threatening them and surrounding their automobiles. Since then, the building has remained closed as the crowds living in the tent city that has sprung up on the streets and sidewalks around it have grown in size and become more militant. They are promising to grow their numbers and stay put until ICE is disbanded. Meanwhile, the Democrat socialist mayor of Portland, Ted Wheeler, ordered Portland police to stand down and keep their distance from the mobs, even as they close down city streets…

Abolish I.C.E. PDX’s Twitter account links to a daily multi-page Resources guide that reports on the goings-on as it requests that people come on down and join the occupiers living in the tent city. It also lists items that need to be brought or donated to support the occupiers (such as specific foods, sleeping bags, tents, personal hygiene products, condoms, etc.). The effort is quite well-organized with WiFi access having been set up to provide occupiers with free Internet access so they can instantly share photos, videos, and reports of what’s happening via social media with other radicals around the country.

On Sunday June 24, the Portland tent city’s 6-page Resources guide included these two notices: 1) Today’s weather is sunny all day, with a high of 89°F. Wear sunscreen, drink water, take care of yourself. 2) Download the ACLU Mobile Justice app to record police, if they arrive. It will automatically upload the footage to the ACLU.

Meanwhile, neighborhood businesses, including restaurants, have had to hire private security because occupiers are stealing (or “borrowing”) everything that isn’t nailed down and trespassing on businesses’ parking lots, impeding commerce.

This wave of insurrection aimed at ICE is one element of a broader effort to frustrate and curtail law enforcement in many other areas and to intimidate government officials. The big picture agenda is to tie the hands of police at every level. In a variety of major cities now, left wing mayors are instructing local police to ignore law breaking by illegal immigrants and people of color on the theory that to not enforce laws and hold illegals and “minority” lawbreakers accountable will reduce the number of illegals and people of color who are locked up for crimes, in numbers greatly disproportionate to – that is, much higher than – their percentage of the population, because they commit more crimes.

The most recent example of this insidious policy is taking place in Austin Texas, the leftist political leaders of which have declared Austin the first “freedom city” in Texas.

The move is seen as a challenge to Texas’s state law passed last year that forbids localities from declaring themselves “sanctuary cities.” As the Los Angeles Times reported on June 19: “City Council members unanimously passed two resolutions last week that will restrict police attempts to question immigrants about their status and curtail arrests for nonviolent crimes.”

One of the new city resolutions requires officers who question immigrants [sic] about status to also say that their questions about immigration need not be answered. The other resolution directs police to avoid arrests for misdemeanors, including those for smoking marijuana, having drug paraphernalia, and taking part in petty theft – crimes that city data shows frequently end in arrests of black and Latino residents.

While Austin is among the country’s first so-called freedom cities, it’s part of a wider movement around decriminalizing low-level offenses and decreasing arrests. According to Local Progress, a national network of progressive city officials, some council members in El Paso and Dallas are also considering “freedom city” proposals.

In recent years, law-breaking from the streets to the political suites no longer carries consequences for the preferred classes – Democrat politicians, high-level Deep State bureaucrats, professional leftist and anarchist agitators and their fellow travelers, and now illegal alien invaders.

Dozens of protesters organized by the Metropolitan Anarchist Coordinating Council (MACC) are camping outside of an ICE office building in Manhattan on Saturday June 23. They are blocking the loading dock through which ICE vans bring immigrants in and out of the building…

Far left groups whose rag tag appearance belies their sophisticated networking skills, including Direct Action Network, and Democratic Socialists of America, are behind the actions. The Hill analyzed the radicals’ agendas after a group of DSA activists loudly confronted DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen while she was having dinner at a restaurant in Washington, D.C.

Though the protests are not led by any one group, the Maxine Waters fan base, the Antifa movement, the Democratic Socialists of America, the Bernie Sanders PCOs, the Democratic party’s radical wing, and many others are all involved in most states, alongside groups associated with prison abolition, immigration rights and anarchist collectives.

The protesters are calling for an abolition of ICE and an end to what they call human rights abuses by the criminal justice system, alongside other reforms.

Cities around the country including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and in Washington State and Utah have seen waves of demonstrators assemble at local ICE headquarters in attempts to shut down the agency’s operations enforcing immigration laws, including processing deportation orders against illegal criminals.


Dr Churchill


Do you now see how the hateful Media of the masses turns their mind around to a poisoned and toxic state where the sheeple are always and constantly outraged about everything?

Same as when President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television” and the Media thought that this is outrageous and that all the secret hearings are the best for the pursuit of justice and for the informing of the American public.

Maybe become that way they control the information flow and the narrative as the collude with the gatekeepers of the Deep State government.

Still President Trump persisted: “The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are – there should be total transparency!”

Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee. Strzok apparently was willing to go before Congress, but the committee issued the order for the June 27 appearance because he wouldn’t confirm a specific date to appear, Fox News has learned.

Strzok was involved in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation before he was removed following the revelation of several anti-Trump text messages with his bureau colleague and lover, Lisa Page.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz’s report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump’s election night win, saying ” Trump’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.

Earlier Monday night, Trump also criticized Virginia Democratic Sen. Mark Warner following reports that Warner, while allegedly drinking alcohol at a retreat on Martha’s Vineyard, joked to donors that he might reveal sensitive information known only to him and Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

“If you get me one more glass of wine, I’ll tell you stuff only Bob Mueller and I know. If you think you’ve seen wild stuff so far, buckle up. It’s going to be a wild couple of months,” he reportedly said jokingly.

“Why is Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), perhaps in a near drunken state, claiming he has information that only he and Bob Mueller, the leader of the 13 Angry Democrats on a Witch Hunt, knows,” Trump questioned. “Isn’t this highly illegal. Is it being investigated?”

Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, was at a dinner for more than 100 guests as part of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee’s (DSCC) annual Majority Trust retreat.

Meanwhile all Democrats & MSM Drive Us Ever Closer to a nasty event like the one they started back on April 12th, of 1861 – which proved to be the greatest blood letting this country had ever had…

Democrats are the ones who pushed the United States into the last Civil War, and are now again pushing all of us, toward this New Civil War





Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton’s is now traveling around England and is still explaining whose fault it was that she lost an election rigged in her favor.

Today, she is in Oxford complaining about the massive threat posed by the Electoral College in America, that apparently subverts the will of the people. Because according to her version of History, it was that despicable institution that caused her to move towards the Outhouse instead of the White House.

Nice job Hill, now that you are traveling in the old Blighty — please go for lunch in the pub to have a typical fare, and try some spotted dick, and mash. Take that down with some bangers and your throat will benefit from the urinal ale, that any decent publican will offer you at the nearest pub.

Enjoy the pub fare and don’t forget to write about your culinary adventures in the land of the publicans and their breed…

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: