Posted by: Dr Churchill | October 9, 2018

SpyGate – Chapter Fifty Seven – “Where is the Meat?”


This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Fifty Seven
“Where is the Meat?”

All the green toads inhabiting the DC swamp know that Hillary Clinton should be charged with treason and sent to jail, yet they wouldn’t dare to prosecute her, because the old hag would take down half the town within the District of Columbia and in the general status quo establishment with her.     

So the powerful bureaucrats and the leaders of all the top-secret security services, the FBI, the CIA, and the DOJ, as well as all the refusniks left over from the O’bummer White House led by Valerie Jarrett along with all the holdovers, and the rear guard of the Obama-Hillary era, and of the other five globalist presidents before them.

These nincompoops cannot do the right thing for America, because they are afraid of their own downfall…

Since so many crimes have been committed by all of them, and not one of them has remained uncompromised — it follows that they do not want to pursue any type of Truth & Justice.

Yet for now, all Americans need to know this much: The Special Access Programs compromise (SAPs) and Hillary Clinton’s toilet email server that was compromised by the Chinese and just about anyone else, and that resulted in the death of more than three dozen American operatives deep inside China.

But with all these dirty lawyers conspiring and colluding to sink our Democracy, who else thinks Perkins Coie’s corrupt law firm attorney, Michael Sussman has a pet stuffed bear named — wait for it — Lucifer…

Screen Shot 2018-10-07 at 1.39.42 AM

Now all the Bernie Sanders peeps, might want to rethink the furore about that NGP-VAN CrowdStrike purported hacking attack on the DNC servers, that was blamed on grandpa Bernie’s savvy tech fingers…

But why did this take so long to figure this one out?

Because all of us as a nation, we’ve been amusing ourselves forever with the Russia Dossier, with the FISA FBI investigations, and with the smear campaign against Brett Kavanaugh, so that we can’t look the other way to see the real deal.

We are all knee deep in the side show with that crazy bat, a psychologist from LA-LA land, named Ms Christine Blasey Ford and her tales of woe at the hands of an underage Brett Kavanaugh…

Her soap story from almost forty years ago has captivate the nation…

That was followed by an onslaught of gang rapes and illicit sex and trains of boys going to the same parties where willing females would go back for dozens of times to experience the train of young boys gang raping them.


Is that the proof psychologists are looking for that the porno-fication of America has finally happened after living as a puritanical nation for two and a half centuries.

Screen Shot 2018-09-26 at 3.23.39 PM

Magic trick eh?

In the wake of recent information dropped by Donna Brazile, new questions should be asked regarding Crowdstrike’s involvement in the 2016 election.
Let’s begin with a little background: the DNC had woefully lax security: they only “had a standard email spam-filtering service, intended to block phishing attacks and malware created to resemble legitimate email.”

The reason for this?

According to Technology Director at the DNC, Andrew Brown, “There was never enough money to do everything we needed to do.”

The FBI first discovered the DNC had been breached in September of 2015. Just one month prior, as Donna Brazile notes in her book “Hacks” the DNC chair, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, had mismanaged the party’s finances, and now had “no choice” but to sign a joint fundraising agreement with the Clinton campaign which gave them effective control of DNC operations in exchange for bailing the party out.
By December, the influence of the Clinton campaign had become clear. Josh Uretsky was recommended by the DNC to the Bernie campaign — and his activities just so happened to result in the Bernie campaign being cut off from NGP-VAN weeks from the first primaries.

The DNC’s poor security posture, overall — coupled with NGP-VAN ignoring previous reports of issues resulting in other campaigns being able to access each other’s data — walked them into needing the help of a third-party.

This is where Crowdstrike, comes in again, in order to investigate the breach of voter file data by the DNC plant.
It would appear that — much like the way Debbie bankrupted the DNC, needing her friend Hillary to “bail them out” in a deal giving Hillary control of the party — the DNC, under Hillary’s control, set themselves up to where they needed assistance from their friends at Crowdstrike on a technical level.

And wouldn’t you know it? CrowdStrike’s report on this data breach is not publicly available.

During the “plant breach” investigation, Crowdstrike would need to be able to access NGP-VAN and other high-level items for forensics. But this investigation took until April to complete. Meaning, CrowdStrike had access to voter files as the primaries proceeded.

Then, in April, it was discovered that the DNC itself had been breached. This now meant Crowdstrike’s help — and so, its continued presence in the DNC network — was still needed. CrowdStrike continued working in the network — now on “monitoring” the threat (in a production environment, no less) rather than containing and eliminating it. Finally, on June 10, Crowdstrike purged the network of “Russians.”

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.35.49 PM

This means that from right before the start of the primaries to the end, Crowdstrike was in the DNC network — including NGP-VAN.
Of course, then CrowdStrike had such a failure of their “protection” they had to come back again, which leads into Adam Carter’s work on their potential role in “faking” Guccifer 2.0 and covering-up for a leak to Wikileaks.

Even more interestingly, according to Donna Brazile, right before the DNC announced they were “hacked,” CrowdStrike confiscated staff computers and wiped everything without warning and with no opportunity to back anything up.

Couple this with the fact the DNC did not permit the FBI to look over their servers, nor accept DHS’s help, and insisted they too, rely on CrowdStrike’s findings — an entity the DNC paid and you begin to wonder to what extent this cover-up takes all of our security services in?

Given that CrowdStrike had access into the DNC network, including NGP-VAN, for the entire length of the primary (and then some) and subsequently participated in a potential “hoax” hack with “Russian fingerprints” to deflect from leaked emails showing the DNC were cheating for Hillary, it would also seem possible that CrowdStrike would also be able to access and make use of Bernie Sander’s voter file.

But to what end?

It’s always about the wicked witch of the West, and about how to white wash her evilness.

Screen Shot 2018-10-09 at 12.27.30 PM

Doing what they do best, of course — pretending to be Russians, as they attack state voter rolls and purge or damage records for Bernie supporters, specifically. And if they don’t attack the rolls, they could always hand the voter file data to someone else who can do that — at the state level or otherwise.

And once they’re done “meddling” in an election, of course they erase the evidence and clean up the scene.

Suddenly, CrowdStrike receives almost $100K, specifically $99,000 USD, from the DNC the day after Seth Rich’s murder.


And they also receive $114,000 the day after Shawn Lucas’s death.


This awfully concurrent show of coincidences, would indeed seem a little bit out of place.

At least it would look “funny” to an uninformed random person, but to those of us who know Hillary’s methods — this is standard boiler-plate.

Now finally everyone has to admit that the Russia hoax was set up to hide something far bigger, and that Mueller is indeed a daft operator, and a silly bugger to boot, because after all the headline grabbing he has gotten — he is still pretending to be a deaf mute that has no sense of right or wrong.

I’m just saying this, because this man is so corrupt, that the People are gonna rise up and tear him down soonest.

You can read more interesting deep rabbit hole stuff here about all of the above:


Now, if President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise.

This assessment bellow is written by Col Jim Waurishuk, USAF (Ret.), National Security Analyst, who says that all Americans need to know about the Special Access Programs (SAPs) and Hillary Clinton’s unsecured email that gave all of our secrets to the Chinese enemies of our country.

Here is what I can personally say about Special Access Programs (SAP’s), their criticality, impact, and potential consequences, as a result of leak or compromise, and what I can attest to in an unclassified form:

The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.

SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have access to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards. This means, regardless of the point that Hillary was SecState, staff aides like Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, etc. had absolutely ‘zero’ reason to have any access to any SAPs, period. How that happened and who authorized it is criminal in itself. If Clinton determined a need, the SAP Program Manger would have been called in to brief her. (See my comments below on SAP Program Managers.) Both before and after which depending the need for her to know she would have been read on prior and at a determined later point, read-off.

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.41.14 PM

Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. During my career, while I have probably been read on to over one hundred SAPs, rarely was I read on to more than one SAP a time, and in only a handful of situations ever more than three (and only because they in fact were connected). Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire U.S. government. When a program is completed, terminated or ended for whatever reason, or if a read on person leaves the program, all people who have been “read on”, must be “read off”. Like “read on’s” all “read off’s” also include signing of Non-Disclosure Statements that stipulates you take your knowledge and involvement in this program to the grave.

Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, and within agencies of the intelligence community, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done. I served in one high-level position, were I was one of two people who maintained the list of every SAP across the government. By that, meaning the name of the program, less than a one sentence description and the agency/organization and program manager.

I was not read on to the any of the programs, but was designated to get in contact with those who could, should a very senior official need to be made aware in case of a crisis or contingency. Many senior national security officials, cabinet secretaries, diplomats generals, admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still do not rate being indoctrinated into nearly all the SAPs within the US. national security community. In fact, most don’t even know the most SAPs exist.

Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic and regular polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. During my career since 1985 or so, I underwent polygraphs on average every three years, in order to maintain access to the SAP programs I was involved with and, or was required to be knowledgeable of.

Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise. I am aware of what Snowden revealed, but he deals were limited.
To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in many cases, result in life in prison.

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.38.01 PM

That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could, and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the specific SAP. The intelligence community will certainly know if that happens, but will never reveal it publicly because that could likely validate the death and prevent U.S. deniability of other sources and methods. Most people truly do not understand and have absolutely no concept of how grave and dangerous and perilous a revelation and compromise would be.

As a former career senior intelligence officer and special operations special mission intelligence officer and National Security Council staff member, I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server contained or had help SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse than electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP could or will do. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.

If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise. Likewise, there is a dual track investigation against time to find every person who has had access and seen any and all SAP related copies of those on Ms. Clintons server and were forward or copied, even if inadvertently. I also know from experience, there are foreign intelligence agents seeking to find who may have been in receipt of Clinton’s emails either forwarded or copied. The revelation that Hillary Clinton had such high level intelligence information on her personal server more than likely has upped the ante of foreign espionage efforts to try and find out if there are people or copies in their position and, or in other’s email accounts.

If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe Congress would have no alternative but initiate the impeach process of her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.

If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could get away with something like this in our system of government.

If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is true to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.

Screen Shot 2018-10-09 at 12.35.39 PM

If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nation’s most sensitive information – period. Further, the precedent within the national security community for those indicted, charged and prosecuted for lesser violations, involving smaller less harmful secrets, for failing to safeguard and protect national security information and secrets, by virtue of policy, will also be devastating — especially those individuals whose violations were errors and accidental, vice deliberate and intentional and never resulted anywhere close to a compromise.

Again, this is my contention, based on many years of experience serving in numerous capacities across the intelligence and national security communities.

Jim Waurishuk, Colonel, USAF

Col Jim Waurishuk, USAF (Ret.), National Security Analyst, is a treasure trove of information on this matter…

Jim Waurishuk is a retired USAF Colonel, serving nearly 30-years as a career senior intelligence and political-military affairs officer and special mission intelligence officer with expertise in strategic intelligence, international strategic studies and policy, and asymmetric warfare. He served combat and combat-support tours in Grenada, Panama, Iraq, and Afghanistan, as well as on numerous special operations and special mission intelligence contingencies in Central America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa. He served as a special mission intelligence officer assigned to multiple Joint Special Operations units, and with the CIA’s Asymmetric Warfare Task Force, as well as in international and foreign advisory positions. He served as Deputy Director for Intelligence for U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) during the peak years of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Global War on Terrorism.

He is a former White House National Security Council staffer and a former Distinguished Senior Fellow with the Atlantic Council, Washington, D.C. He served as a senior advisor to the Commander U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) and is Vice President of the Special Ops-OPSEC — which provides strategic and operational security analysis and assessments to governmental and private entities, as well as media organizations on national security issues, policy, and processes. He currently provides advisory and consulting services on national security, international strategic policy, and strategy assessments for the U.S. and foreign private sector and governments entities, media groups and outlets, and to political groups, forums, and political candidates.

He is an author and writer providing regular commentary and opinion to national and local TV, radio networks, and for both print and online publications, as well as speaking engagements to business, political, civic and private groups on national security matters – focusing on international strategic policy and engagement, and strategic intelligence, and subject matter expertise on special mission intelligence and operations, counter-terrorism, and asymmetric warfare and conflict.

But let’s see the results of Hillary Clinton’s careless by design toilet email server: THE CHINESE KILLED “12” OF OUR CIA SOURCES THEY CAPTURED During The Time They Hacked Hillary’s Server In Her Private Residence. This Started With Bill Selling China Anything They Wanted. No Doubt that They Had Her Password, An Open Book.

Chinese Reportedly Hacked Hillary Server. During Same Time, 12 CIA Sources Reportedly Killed by China.


Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.37.34 PM

Russian computer hacking might have been the least of Hillary Clinton’s security breaches.

The former secretary of state’s email scandal is back in the headlines, and its impact on American national security might have been even worse than Americans knew.

And deadly for American intelligence sources in China.

According to an exclusive Daily Caller News Foundation report, the unauthorized, unsecured computer server Clinton used while serving as the United States top diplomat — privy to some of the deepest secrets in the national security community — was penetrated by a Chinese firm “involved in collecting intelligence for China.”

As the exclusive DCNF report stated:

“The Chinese firm obtained Clinton’s emails in real time as she sent and received communications and documents through her personal server, according to the sources, who said the hacking was conducted as part of an intelligence operation.

“The Chinese wrote code that was embedded in the server, which was kept in Clinton’s residence in upstate New York. The code generated an instant ‘courtesy copy’ for nearly all of her emails and forwarded them to the Chinese company, according to the sources.”

In other words, an American secretary of state who felt entitled to work on her own amateurish computer system had exposed all of her correspondence to one of the country’s most powerful and dangerous rivals in world affairs.

And it’s possible that at least 12 operatives serving United States intelligence agencies paid for Clinton’s security breach with their lives.

Do you recognize that Clinton’s toilet email server and her private message system, with her private emails, that constituted a flagrant violation of security rules, led the Chinese to American intelligence operatives?

Of course it did.

According to a New York Times report from May 2017, a successful Chinese counterintelligence operation that started in 2010 “systematically dismantled C.I.A. spying operations in the country starting in 2010, killing or imprisoning more than a dozen sources over two years and crippling intelligence gathering there for years afterward.”

“From the final weeks of 2010 through the end of 2012, according to former American officials, the Chinese killed at least a dozen of the C.I.A.’s sources,” The Times reported. “According to three of the officials, one was shot in front of his colleagues in the courtyard of a government building — a message to others who might have been working for the C.I.A.”

Maybe it’s a coincidence, but 2010 was Clinton’s first full year as secretary of state.

Naturally, she would not have been in on every detail of covert CIA operations, but it’s entirely possible that Chinese intelligence services reading her correspondence in real time would be able to glean enough information to identify where the United States might have intelligence assets within China.

After a year of getting such information, it’s not hard to imagine the Chinese intelligence services having enough to take drastic, deadly action against sources helping their American rivals.

At any rate, it has now been proven that Hillary Clinton’s private email server hidden in the toilet, has been thoroughly and professionally hacked by the Chinese intelligence. The death toll of American operatives i China has risen steadily due to that fact, and the news of it has now been circulating back in America as well, more than a year after “The New York Times” reported a disastrous breach in American intelligence operations taking place in China at the same time that the Clinton breach occurred.

It’s not a big stretch of the imagination for anyone with an elementary knowledge of Security Agency knowledge, to put those two items of interest together… and draw the correct conclusions.

There are, of course, other possible explanations as well…

Screen Shot 2018-10-08 at 7.43.36 AM

Writing for Foreign Policy earlier in August, Zach Dorfman claimed that a faulty communications system was to blame — although the exact nature of that system was understandably left undescribed.

“The CIA had imported the system from its Middle East operations, where the online environment was considerably less hazardous, and apparently underestimated China’s ability to penetrate it,” he wrote.

Dorfman also cited “former intelligence officials” who put the number of executions by the Chinese much higher than 12 — closer, in fact, to 30.

“When things started going bad, they went bad fast” one of the former officials told Dorfman.

Nonetheless, the timing — and Clinton’s notorious history of playing fast and loose with the truth when it comes to intelligence, security, classified information and foreign policy — give reason for pause.

Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state is infamous for many reasons, but her bungling of American diplomatic security that led to the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, and her shameless lying to the American people about what happened, is one of the worst.

Having her government email being hacked by Chinese intelligence, is connected with a Chinese counter espionage operation, that ended with the roll-up of all American intelligence operations in China — and the swift extraction of confessions through torture and the executions of 30 US operatives working for American interests.

This disaster is the direct result of Hillary’s private toilet email server, that everyone had hacked and used as their own toilet to pee and poop straight on Madame Secretary’s head and on her dirty dealings.

And indeed Russia, the United States’ other big rival besides China, on the world stage, has long been known to have been engaged in intelligence operations targeting the Democratic National Committee, and by extension, Hillary’s campaign — but on this instance it was the Chinese who ate her goat.

So, Russian hacking might have been the least of Clinton’s leak worries, and that’s why nobody ever talks about China from the Clinton camp.

However to cover up their tracks the corrupt swamp toads are now Trail Covering and as Predicted earlier the DOJ, the FBI and the Treasury all turn on Oleg Deripaska…

Some things are just so predictable they become funny.

The story of Oleg Deripaska is a little bit convoluted and challenging to keep up with. The short version is that former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, FBI Agent Peter Strzok and corrupt U.S. DOJ officials tried to recruit Deripaska in 2016 for their vast Russian conspiracy plot against candidate Trump, President-Elect Trump and President Trump.

Because of the associations with the scheme and coup-plotters, Oleg has buckets of dirt on corrupt U.S. officials who were trying to target Donald Trump. In the wake of a soft-coup failure, Oleg then became a risk. So it comes as no surprise to see today the U.S. DOJ and Treasury turn on him and confiscate his U.S. assets.

It means any American companies engaging in business with him must cease operations by November 12, extended from the original October 23 deadline reports Crime Russia.

Of course we had predicted that this would happen when we wrote that: “All of a sudden Deripaska the asset becomes a risk to the corrupt Scheme Team (DOJ/FBI et al); especially as the DOJ/FBI then execute the “insurance policy” effort against Donald Trump…. and eventually enlist Robert Mueller.”

“It is entirely possible for a Russian to be blackmailing someone, but it ain’t Trump vulnerable to blackmail; it’s the conspiracy crew within the DOJ and FBI. Deripaska now has blackmail material on Comey, McCabe and crew.”

Oleg Deripaska is a typical Russian gremlin, and if you research him you can tell he loves mocking the corrupt elements within U.S. politics. I’m almost positive it was Oleg who put the Trump “pee tapes and hookers” into the Steele Dossier just to see if the knuckleheads in the DOJ/FBI would actually use it.

Considering Christopher Steele was a contracted employee of the billionaire it just looks like something Oleg would do. Deripaska and many Russian political types just work that way. To them, manipulating U.S. officials is funny….. ‘stoopid Amerikans‘ etc.

Here’s the Oleg Deripaska whole story: According to the Catherine Herridge report, the name Oleg Deripaska has resurfaced, this time with some extra and hugely unwanted  attention, becuase Oleg Deripaska, is a Russian billionaire and is likely much more of a central figure than previously discussed in the DOJ – FBI hoax about the salacious Trump dossier and the Coup D’Etat the deep state swamp creatures unleashed against America.

Byron York previously outlined new documents showing the communication between the author of the salacious Trump Dossier — Mr Christopher Steele and the highly placed DOJ official Mr Bruce Ohr.

Screen Shot 2018-10-09 at 5.47.53 PM

Within the early 2016 discussions, Chris Steele appeared to be advocating to Bruce Ohr on behalf of Oleg Deripaska who was banned from travel into the U.S. by the State Department.

Emails in 2016 between former British spy Christopher Steele and Justice Department official Bruce Ohr suggest Steele was deeply concerned about the legal status of a Putin-linked Russian oligarch, and at times seemed to be advocating on the oligarch’s behalf, in the same time period Steele worked on collecting the Russia-related allegations against Donald Trump that came to be known as the Trump dossier. The emails show Steele and Ohr were in frequent contact, that they intermingled talk about Steele’s research and the oligarch’s affairs, and that Glenn Simpson, head of the dirt-digging group Fusion GPS that hired Steele to compile the dossier, was also part of the ongoing conversation.

I strongly urge you to read the York article because I’m going to expand on the Deripaska angle from the context of the reader understanding the relationship.

From the emails it appears Steele and Ohr were discussing Deripaska during a period of February to May (ish) of 2016. This is important context moving forward because this was the period during the presidential primary candidacy of Donald Trump as the GOP nominee was solidified; Trump won. This is also the period when we know that “contractors” with the FBI were doing unauthorized searches of the NSA and FBI database for opposition research…. this connects to Fusion GPS.

In essence, Christopher Steele was interested in getting Oleg Deripaska a new VISA to enter the U.S. Steele was very persistent on this endeavor and was soliciting Bruce Ohr for any assistance. This also sets up a quid-pro-quo probability where the DOJ/FBI agrees to remove travel restrictions on Deripaska in exchange for cooperation on ‘other matters’.

Now we skip ahead a little bit to where Deripaska gained an entry visa, and one of Oleg Deripaska’s lawyers and lobbyists Adam Waldman was representing his interests in the U.S. to politicians and officials. In May of 2018, John Solomon was contacted by Adam Waldman with a story about how the FBI contacted Deripaska for help in their Trump Russia investigation in September of 2016.

Keep in mind, this is Waldman contacting Solomon with a story.

Waldman told Solomon a story about how his client Oleg Deripaska was approached by the FBI in September of 2016 and asked for help with information about Paul Manafort and by extension Donald Trump. Within the backstory for the FBI and Deripaska was a prior connection between Robert Mueller and Deripaska in 2009.

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.39.25 PM

And here is John McCain visiting Oleg Deripaska’s yacht to be entertained and to conspire against the interests of the United States all over again.

Again, as you continue reading on this story bellow, please remember that this is Waldman contacting Solomon because: “In 2009 the FBI, then headed by Robert Mueller, requested the assistance of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska in an operation to retrieve former FBI officer and CIA resource Robert Levinson who was captured in Iran two years earlier. The agent assigned to engage Deripaska was Andrew McCabe; the primary FBI need was financing and operational support. Deripaska spent around $25 million and would have succeeded except the U.S. State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, backed out. In early September of 2016 Andrew McCabe is now Deputy Director of the FBI, when two FBI agents approached Deripaska in New York – again asking for his help. This time the FBI request was for Deripaska to outline Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort as a tool of the Kremlin. Deripaska once hired Manafort as a political adviser and invested money with him in a business venture that went bad. Deripaska sued Manafort, alleging he stole money. However, according to the article, despite Deripaska’s disposition toward Manafort he viewed the request as absurd. He laughed the FBI away, telling them: “You are trying to create something out of nothing.”

This story, as told from the perspective of Adam Waldman – Deripaska’s lawyer/lobbyist- is important because it highlights a connection between Robert Mueller and Oleg Deripaska; a connection Mueller and the DOJ or the FBI never revealed on their own.

The ramifications of the Solomon Story are huge and again none fo the US secret services is willing to review, because there’s a larger story now visible with the new unveiled communication between Christopher Steele and Bruce Ohr.

It is likely that Oleg’s 2016 entry into the U.S. was facilitated as part of a quid-pro-quo; either agreed in advance, or, more likely, planned by the DOJ/FBI for later use in their 2016 Trump operation; as evidenced in the September 2016 FBI request. Regardless of the planning aspect, billionaire Deripaska is connected to Chris Steele, a source for Chris Steele, and likely even the employer of Chris Steele.

The FBI used Oleg Deripaska (source), and Oleg Deripaska used the FBI (visa).

Here’s where it gets interesting….

In that May article John Solomon reports that Deripaska wanted to testify in front of the US Congress last year (2017), without any immunity request, but was rebuked.

But one has to ask the pertimnent question:

Who blocked Oleg Deripaska’s testimony?

And for what purpose?

In 2017 Oleg Deripaska was represented in the U.S. by Adam Waldman. Mr. Waldman was also representing Christopher Steele, the author of the Dossier. Waldman was the liaison that the Senator Mark Warner (Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chairman) was using to try and set up a secret meeting with Christopher Steele.

As you can see from the text messages exchanged between the two, the House Intelligence Committee wanted to interview Deripaska. However, based on their ongoing contact and relationship with Deripaska’s lawyer — Adam Waldman, asks the Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chair Mark Warner for feedback.

Instead of feedback, he gets blockage.

Oleg Deripaska was blocked from testifying in front of the US Congress.

Now, it was something that was obviously done (not from the HPSCI, the Nunes Committee), but rather from the Senate Intel Committee, via Vice-Chair Senator Mark Warner.

Oh yes, the lovely Senator Mark Warner again.

Now, think about this….

Yes, with Oleg Deripaska in the picture there was indeed Russian meddling in the 2016 election; only, it wasn’t the type of meddling currently being sold. The FBI/DOJ were using Russian Deripaska to frame their Russian conspiracy narrative. It is almost a certainty that Deripaska was one of Christopher Steele’s sources for the dossier.

Now, put yourself in Deripaska’s shoes and think about what happens after the then candidate Donald Trump surprisingly wins the 2916 US election.

All of a sudden Mr Oleg Deripaska (the asset) becomes a risk to the corrupt Scheme Team (DOJ/FBI et al); especially as the DOJ/FBI then execute the “insurance policy” effort against Donald Trump…. and eventually enlist Robert Mueller.

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.33.52 PM

It is entirely possible for a Russian to be blackmailing someone, but it ain’t Trump who is vulnerable to this blackmail. Instead it is the DC conspiracy crew of the deep swamp of Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House who enlisted the most corrupt people within the DOJ and the FBI to do their dirty deeds.

And they are now finding out that Oleg Deripaska has blackmail material on Comey, Mueller, McCabe and the rest of the dirty deeds Democrat crew.

And for Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Yates, and all — after the 2017 (first year) failure of the “insurance policy” it now seems far more likely that President Trump will outlive and outwit their Coup D’Etat.

Important to recall that in May of 2018, Oleg Deripaska tells Waldman to call John Solomon and tell him the story from a perspective favorable to Deripaska.

As the story unfolds, in 2017 Oleg was more than willing to testify to the US Congress … and is now likely laughing the entire time … because the corrupt participants within Congress made damn sure that they wouldn’t let Deripaska testify.

Enter corrupt SSCI Vice-Chairman; Mark Warner:

Ummmm … we’ve got a problem here Mark…

The Russians (Deripaska) really do have leverage and blackmail… but it ain’t over Trump. Oleg has blackmail on Comey, McCabe and conspiracy crew. Oleg Deripaska must be kept away from congress and away from exposing the scheme.

Control is needed.

You can almost hear the corrupt U.S. intelligence officials calling their U.K. GCHQ partners in Britain/Australia and trying to coordinate an escape plan.

Well, well, well…. Lookie here? Who dat? Apparently the SSCI wants to interview WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, in a closed session. Signed by none-other than our corrupt-o-crats Richard Burr and Mark Warner. Yeah, funny that.

Lest anyone need a reminder…. “The most corrupt part of congress is the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). The SSCI is the center of the deepest part of the Deep State swamp. The SSCI never, ever, E.V.E.R… does anything that does not protect and advance the self-interest of the corrupt Washington DC professional political class.”

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.32.31 PM

Now do we see why the SSCI is the center of protecting the entire fraudulent apparatus?

It’s somewhat humorous to look at this fiasco from the perspective of Oleg Deripaska. He must be having a lot of laughs with his Russkie friends about these stupid Americans and how the intelligence apparatus of the United States of America is controlled by corrupt politicians trying to save themselves and their corrupt institutions.

The Russians, notorious for sowing discord, are being used as a shield from sunlight upon actions taken by U.S. own intelligence officers: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, Valerie Jarrett, John Brennan, James Clapper etc.

There’s a reason why I keep emphasizing the source of the John Solomon story was Adam Waldman. Think about it from the perspective of the conspiracy group reading how Oleg instructed Waldman to present his story.

With Deripaska telling Solomon how the FBI contacted him; the background of their prior collaborative relationship; and the likelihood of Deripaska giving information to Chris Steele for the dossier; the scheme team really, really, needed to double down on the Russian conspiracy narrative in case Oleg ever did testify to congress.

By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense. They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc. And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?

The soft Coup D’Etat team protects themselves by impugning the motives of Oleg Deripaska, and by diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.

Screen Shot 2018-10-08 at 5.12.11 PM

[Oleg being Oleg] Everyone was wondering how the salacious and ridiculous Russian “hookers” and “pee tapes” story went into the Steele Dossier. Well, in recent discoveries, including text message and emails between DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr and Christopher Steele, it was uncovered that Christopher Steele was representing Oleg Deripaska; and was also likely employed (at least in part) by Oleg Deripaska.

It now stands as a virtual certainty that Deripaska was the source of those ridiculous claims that Steele put into the dossier.

Further, and in full appreciation for Ziiggii’s discovery, here is a picture of Anastasia Vashukevich (the Russian escort currently imprisoned in Thailand) and Russian Billionaire Oleg Deripaska on his boat in October 2017: Pay close attention to the caption: Mistress Olegarkha Nastya Rybka together with the heroine of sex on the quay Sasha Travkoy will conduct an exclusive outreach training for girls from 18 to 23 years old. The training they will teach:
How and where to meet people from Forbes, techniques of dating and attracting attention. Effective patterns of behavior. How and about what to communicate with the billionaire, to support the conversation, so that it would be fun and interesting…
How can you satisfy a man who is tempted by a woman’s attention in bed and probably uncover his sexual potential, find his fetishes and hidden sexual desires;

How to tear down the roof of the oligarch, make his life fascinating; how to stand out in a highly competitive environment, to be remembered and become unique for him;
Strategies of the impact on a married object; How to merge your wife/mistress/official favorite; How to fall in love with yourself with clips and methods of falling in love.
How to be bold, ready for any moves, dare change his life and his status in it! Best pupils will receive a bonus on the results of the training: the opportunity to meet Oleg Deripaska, Mikhail Prokhorov and Roman Abramovich on January 2nd at a closed event and try to seduce them.

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.33.01 PM

“The training will take place from November 18 to 26 in Thailand. After the training, homework will be given, carried out under the supervision of trainers, to prepare for the meeting with billionaires. There is a Schengen visa for the meeting. The cost of training is 20 thousand rubles when paid before November 1.
After November 1, the training price is 30 thousand rubles.
The price does not include accommodation and meals, only training. Recording to direct, payment is possible only after the interview.
# Deripaska # olegtinkov # prokhorov # abramovich”

What becomes clear from all of this is that Anastasia Vashukevich was positioned as a Red Sparrow; a recruiting agent for prostitutes and escort workers – under the employ of Oleg Deripaska, likely using the sex trade as Russian trade-craft.

Anastasia Vashukevich was busted in Thailand for her recruiting efforts, as outlined in the media report. Ms Vashukevich tried to extricate herself from the trouble by signaling/leveraging her knowledge of the communication between Deripaska and Christopher Steele to the media.

It is entirely possible Ms. Vashukevich even had the recording of Deripaska telling Steele the ridiculous Trump-Russian-Hookers story; and was trying to use that tape as an exit from the Bangkok prison … Which, given the current situation and collapsing narrative, Deripaska would not want to have been made public.

This further proves the extent to which the corrupt FBI/DOJ were willing to use Deripaska through the intermediary “good offices” of Christopher Steele. Remember, the DOJ allowed Mr Oleg Deripaska to enter the United States by dropping the VISA block on his travel. In return for removing his travel restriction, the FBI asked Mr Oleg Deripaska for help in framing Donald Trump and providing information about Paul Manafort in September of 2016.

This is one of those side-stories that comes from the ridiculous Russian conspiracy hoax story of collusion and all that imaginative and fantastic fake news nonsense. The DOJ and the FBI have all this crap, all over themselves.

And of course, this doesn’t bother President Trump one bit … Actually, it’s kinda funny and he always enjoys a good joke at the expense of his opponents.

And now that the DOJ official Bruce Ohr has testified before Congress about his contacts with Christopher Steele, who was received as the definite author of the dossier, there is one final mystery surrounding Ohr and Steele, and that is about “whom else did Bruce ohr told at the Justice Department about his interactions with Steele as the author of the salacious Trump dossier?”ruce

Bruce Ohr testified that he told his peers in the FBI, but not his superiors, about the dossier-related contacts.

“Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr told Congress earlier this week that he informed half a dozen FBI and Justice Department officials about his contacts with dossier author Christopher Steele and opposition researcher Glenn Simpson.”

Sources familiar with Ohr’s testimony before the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees told The Daily Caller News Foundation that Ohr informed Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page about his interactions with Steele and Simpson. He also informed Justice Department prosecutor Andrew Weissmann about his dossier-related work.

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.44.01 PM

Weissmann is now serving as right-hand man to Robert Mueller at the special counsel’s office.

Ohr testified that he informed his Justice Department peers, but not his superiors, about his contacts with Steele and Simpson. One of the superiors kept out of the loop was former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates. Ohr said he was demoted as assistant deputy attorney general in December because he failed to tell Yates and other top officials about his dossier interactions.

Screen Shot 2018-10-06 at 2.13.42 PM

Republicans have sought an interview with Ohr to find out why he maintained contact with Steele even after the FBI decided to cut ties with the former British spy just before the 2016 election. The FBI said in applications for spy warrants against Trump campaign adviser Carter Page that the bureau dropped Steele as an informant because he had unauthorized contacts with the media. Despite that, Ohr met and spoke with Steele numerous times through May 2017. Ohr debriefed the FBI at least 12 times following his post-election contacts with Steele.

Weissmann’s contact with Ohr about the dossier is significant because of the mutual interest that Weissmann and Fusion’s Simpson had in former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Simpson, a former Wall Street Journal reporter, has told Congress that Fusion GPS investigated Manafort’s links to Russian oligarchs as part of its anti-Trump project.

“A lot of what we were talking to the media about were things in the public record, specifically Carter Page, Paul Manafort had resigned over allegations of illicit relationships with Russian oligarchs and Ukrainian oligarchs,” Simpson told the Senate Judiciary Committee during an Aug. 22, 2017 interview.

“So there was, you know, a lot of open source public information pointing towards the possibility that the Russians had infiltrated the Trump campaign,” he added. “So we spoke broadly to reporters and encouraged them to look into this.”

Screen Shot 2018-10-10 at 1.33.19 PM

As chief of the Justice Department’s criminal fraud division, Weissmann was investigating Manafort even before the special counsel’s team was formed. Weissmann facilitated a meeting in April 2017 with reporters from The Associated Press to discuss the Justice Department’s investigation into Manafort’s work for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Weissmann is the lead prosecutor in two cases against Manafort for that work.

Weissmann has also attracted criticism from Republicans because of his overt support for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. He has donated heavily to Democratic political candidates and attended Clinton’s 2016 election night party in New York City.

Ohr’s wife was also a focus of Tuesday’s closed-door interview.

Republicans pressed Ohr about how his wife, a Russia expert named Nellie Ohr, came to work for Fusion GPS.

Ohr testified that Fusion approached his wife for a job and that she began working for the research firm in late 2015. California GOP Rep. Darrell Issa said Ohr testified that his wife was paid $44,000 by Fusion GPS. As TheDCNF has reported, Ohr did not disclose his wife’s Fusion income on his annual ethics disclosure form.

Perkins Coie, the law firm for the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, paid Fusion GPS more than $1 million for the Trump-Russia project. Fusion paid Steele nearly $170,000 for his work.

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican who helped question Ohr, said that he believes that Fusion GPS chose Nellie Ohr so that the firm could leverage her husband’s senior position at the DOJ.

“Why did they need Bruce Ohr? Why did Fusion want to work with Bruce Ohr?” he said in an interview Tuesday night.

“My guess is, because he is associate deputy attorney general … that just adds heft and weight to what they were trying to do about this whole dossier, which was the key to everything,” he added.

The special counsel’s office declined to comment on Weissmann’s links to Ohr.


Dr Churchill


In short:

Former Top FBI Lawyer Testified that Rosenstein “Seriously” Considered Secretly Recording Trump. Indeed the former FBI General Counsel James Baker, told Congress last week that Rosenstein was serious when he discussed recording the President and invoking the 25th Amendment Baker also told Congress that Mother Jones journalist David Corn also provided the FBI with a version of an anti-Trump dossier

Former FBI General Counsel James Baker told lawmakers last week that based on conversations with senior FBI officials, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was “seriously” considering secretly recording President Trump’s conversations. Rosenstein also discussed the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment on the president in an effort to remove him from office for being unfit. This, according to sources with direct knowledge of Baker’s deposition.

Baker said he met with former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and former FBI attorney Lisa Page shortly after their meeting with Rosenstein in May, 2017. He told lawmakers that McCabe, Page and Rosenstein had discussed the possibility of secretly recording President Trump. Baker, who was the top lawyer for the FBI and a close confidant of Comey, noted that he was not in the meeting with Rosenstein. A source with direct knowledge of the testimony claims Baker testified that “Andy McCabe, Lisa Page took seriously what Rosenstein had said, and when they returned to the office, the three of them discussed the possibility of secretly recording Trump.”

Baker told lawmakers during his deposition last Wednesday, that he told Page and McCabe that “he didn’t think it was unethical’ to secretly record the president.

“He interpreted what McCabe and Page had said as serious,” another source with direct knowledge of Baker’s deposition said. “Baker also added that he ‘didn’t do a legal analysis on…the issue of ‘ bugging the president.’”

Baker’s testimony to lawmakers coincides with a New York Times story published in September that suggested Rosenstein was behind a move in May, 2017 to remove the president after he ordered the firing of former FBI Director James Comey. The irony, however, was that on May 9, 2017, Rosenstein had written the letter outlining the reasons Comey was unfit to serve as FBI director stating, “The director was wrong to usurp the Attorney General’s authority on July 5, 2016, and announce his conclusion that the case should be closed without prosecution. It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement.” The letter continues, “The Director ignored another longstanding principle: we do not hold press conferences to release derogatory information about the subject of a declined criminal investigation.”

Baker told lawmakers that “he didn’t think it was unethical’ to secretly record the president…”

Screen Shot 2018-10-08 at 5.16.38 PM
On Monday, President Trump flew to Florida with Rosenstein in their first sit-down meeting since the New York Times story was published. According to the White House, Trump and Rosenstein met for a half-hour as they headed to the International Association of Chiefs of Police Annual Convention in Orlando, Fla.

Trump said at the event in Florida, “Thank you as well to our Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for being here, flew down together. The press wants to know, ‘What did you talk about?’ ‘We had a very good talk,’ I will say. That became a very big story, actually. We had a good talk.”

It is unsure if the situation will remain the same in light of Baker’s testimony. However, Rosenstein is set to give his deposition to lawmakers on Oct. 11 regarding the information published in the New York Times story, along with the information recently provided by Baker, several congressional lawmakers confirmed to

White House officials did not comment on the deposition by Baker but instead referred comment to the DOJ.

DOJ spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores declined to comment on Baker’s testimony.

But Baker’s testimony revealed even more than the circumstances surrounding the Rosenstein meeting with Page and McCabe.

He also noted that David Corn, a politics journalist with Mother’s Jones magazine also delivered a version of Steele’s dossier to him sometime after the election. Baker, who apparently has known Corn for a long time, said that he turned over the dossier version given to him by Corn to the FBI’s counterintelligence division. Corn had been communicating in the summer of 2016 with former British spy Christopher Steele, who during that time was hired by now embattled research firm Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS’s was paid over $9 million to conduct the research on alleged Russia Trump connections by both the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign, according to reports.

Around the same time period Corn published one of the first big exposes in October, 2016 on the alleged Trump Russia connection A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump. Corn’s dossier appears to have been different than the dossier that now deceased Sen. John McCain gave to the FBI but similar enough in its unsubstantiated substance.

In August, John Solomon published this: “Did FBI get bamboozled by multiple versions of the Trump dossier?”

Solomon noted that the dossiers arrived to the FBI by different messengers to include “McCain, Mother Jones reporter David Corn, Fusion GPS founder (and Steele boss) Glenn Simpson.” The information was exposed in an email that Peter Strzok sent to FBI executives around the time BuzzFeed published a version of the dossier on Jan. 10, 2017.

Strzok wrote in the email, “our internal system is blocking the site. I have the PDF via iPhone but it’s 25.6MB. Comparing now. The set is only identical to what McCain had. (it has differences from what was given to us by Corn and Simpson.)” Strzok was referring to the BuzzFeed version of the dossier posted online, according to The Hill. And the revelation is significant according to lawmakers that noted the FBI should be working diligently to ensure that there is no manipulation of evidence or stacked circular reporting in investigations.

Last week, was revealed that Baker also met with the Democratic party’s top lawyer, Michael Sussmann, to discuss the ongoing investigation by the bureau into the Trump campaign’s alleged ties with Russia.

Screen Shot 2018-10-09 at 9.45.58 AM

According to Baker’s deposition, the meeting happened prior to the FBI’s initial warrant to spy on short-term campaign volunteer Carter Page, sources close to the investigation have told Moreover, information provided by Baker coincides with the House Intelligence Committee’s final Russia report that suggests Sussmann was also leaking unverified information on the Trump campaign to journalists around the same time he met with Baker, according to the report and sources close the investigation.

This new revelation and the related FBI’s failures and illicit involvement with the Coup D’Etat information — exposes the bureau’s failure to inform the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) that the evidence used to spy on the 2016 Trump campaign and it’s advisors like Carter Page and others, was all tainted by partisan logic, made up by failed ex-British spies, and decorated by Putin loyalists like Oleg Deripaska and his red sparrows.

Indeed as almost all the members of the Senate judiciary and all the members of the espionage committee as serious lawmakers said that’s exposure of the Bureau’s failings, further reveals the extensive role and the close connection Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity and national security political lawyer with Perkins Coie unlawful law firm, had, with the smear producing political firm FusionGPS and the British ex-spy “making up shit” for popular consumption like another instance of “Pulp Fiction” for the stupid masses.

It helps to know that it was always the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton Campaign who paid the money to Perkins Coie in order to retain the dirty pulp fiction writers of the FusionGPS political smear shop, through the dirty lawyers of Perkins Coie the law firm that tried to steal the election of 2016 in order to give it back to their clients Obama & Hillary.

What do you do with dirty corrupt lawyers that are meddling with our elections?

Just look at what the military did to them after their involvement in the manufacture of the 2016 electoral fraud and the instability they caused that placed our Republic in jeopardy…

They placed an Ex-Marine at the helm of this errant law shop, in order to stop that nonsense.


Dr Churchill


“KBO man, KBO…”

–Dr Churchill

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: