Posted by: Dr Churchill | September 14, 2018

SpyGate – Chapter Fifty Two – Smoke Screen


This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Fifty Two
“Smoke Screen”

The “Destroy Trump Media” ramps up…

Apparently Trump’s ex manager Paul Manafort makes a deal and the world is coming to an end.


Earlier it was Trump’s ex-attorney Michael Cohen who was making a deal with the prosecutor and he was telling all kinds of lies, giving feedstock to corrupt cop Robert Mueller, who in turn was hoping to implicate President Trump…


Maybe both men have a legal strategy to find ways to plea bargain in order to get some reduced sentences from the federal prosecutor… but in reality they are victims in the primordial battle between good and evil.

They are pawns sacrificed in President Trump’s war to drain the swamp and in that respect we have to accept their loss as President’s Men often fall in battle.

President Trump in a recent interview discussed a wide range of topics, including Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort, and Jeff Sessions, as well as Rod Rosenstein and other corrupt cops like Mueller and the top brass of the FBI and DOJ that are all now coming undone at the seams.

Former Trump campaign adviser Michael Caputo also spoke to the press about this, and said that he believes Michael Cohen is naturally making up stories to get leniency from federal prosecutors in his criminal case, and in no way those stories involve anything against the President.

He just plays the game of Public Relations expertly… and is also playing the game of patiently waiting for his enemies to fully expose themselves before he strikes them fiercely.

And indeed, Michael Cohen, who was President Trump’s longtime personal attorney, actually struck a plea deal with prosecutors admitting to violating federal campaign finance laws by arranging hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal “at the direction” of then-candidate Trump during the 2016 race.

In total, Cohen pleaded guilty to five counts of tax evasion, one count of making false statements to a financial institution, one count of willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution and one count of making an excessive campaign contribution.

Further, Caputo said it is interesting that Cohen as recently as February insisted that the payments to Daniels and McDougal were on the up and up, but when he was faced with federal charges, he changed his tune, in order to get a reduced sentence…

Trump took to Twitter in the following morning to speak about Cohen, and said that Cohen was “making up stories” with this tweet about him:

Donald J. Trump

If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!
5:44 AM – Aug 22, 2018 – 138K – 107K people are talking about this.

Screen Shot 2018-08-23 at 2.52.43 PM

Yet the President felt markedly different for his former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort who this past week pleaded guilty to two felony criminal charges lodged against him in Washington, and agreed to “cooperate” with prosecutors as part of his plea agreement.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson accepted Manafort’s guilty plea in federal court after special counsel Robert Mueller unveiled a superseding indictment against him and a plea agreement in a court document on Friday morning.

When reading from what he called a “cooperation agreement,” Andrew Weismann, a prosecutor on Mueller’s team, said part of the agreement includes “the completion of successful cooperation.”

When asked if he agreed to “fully and truthfully” cooperate with Mueller, Manafort said, “I do.” That cooperation is expected to include interviews, document production and testifying in other proceedings.

President Trump is not named in Friday’s filing, nor is his role with the campaign. But Trump and his allies have been worried that Manafort might agree to cooperate in Mueller’s investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion in the 2016 election as part of his plea deal. Paul Manafort, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to a commit a number offenses against the United States and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice — two of the seven crimes he was originally charged with in October. He is facing a maximum of 10 years in prison.

As part of the deal, federal prosecutors will drop the five remaining charges against him: money laundering, tax fraud, failing to disclose foreign bank accounts, violating federal foreign lobbying law and lying to the Justice Department, but the court filing suggests that Manafort has admitted to all of those actions.

The veteran political operative was convicted last month in Alexandria federal court on eight of the 18 charges of bank and tax fraud brought against him. He has not yet been sentenced. As part of the Washington plea deal, federal prosecutors have agreed to drop the remaining 10 charges on which the jury was deadlocked.

Manafort’s bond was not discussed Friday, which means he will remain jailed in an Alexandria detention center. He has been behind bars since July after Jackson revoked his bond for witness tampering allegations.

All charges stem from Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference and possible connections to the Trump campaign. Manafort could have combined both cases into one but declined.

Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s current lawyer, said that today’s Manafort plea has “nothing to do with President Trump or the Trump campaign,” because “the President did nothing wrong” as it was also evident form the plea deal of Paul Manafort with the Prosecutor.

Naturally the President took to Twitter over this and fired up this tweet in support of Paul Manafort:

Donald J. Trump

I feel very badly for Paul Manafort and his wonderful family. “Justice” took a 12 year old tax case, among other things, applied tremendous pressure on him and, unlike Michael Cohen, he refused to “break” – make up stories in order to get a “deal.” Such respect for a brave man!
6:21 AM – Aug 22, 2018 – 87.7K – 70.8K people are talking about this.

Screen Shot 2018-08-22 at 7.38.44 AM

So the Deep State has scored a couple of sweeping victories in this battle, and convicted two men associated with the President but they have got nothing on the President and on his Campaign and that is the significant story that you do not hear form the MSM.

Because the reality is far different than what we see & hear from the MSM and from the crazed Social Media.

Because besides the important business of the country that the President prosecutes each and every day — all that porn star stuff, the playboy hookers, and the pornstar attorney pimping Stormy Daniels, who is working hard at BJing the horny males and all the skin-bar denizens all over the land to keep her pimp Avennatti, clothed in nice threads, in Armani suits and cruising in Cadillacs with a feathered hat — are inconsequential.

Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 10.29.25 AM

Fun as they are — all the pornstar frolics -and the Mueller exploits at rooting out overdue  tax obligations – are all a sad sideshow, used by the Deep State to distract us from the real important business of the nation, and from the earth changing deals that are going on behind the scenes… since the Mass Media chooses to not cover any of the momentous successes that this President is winning.

And instead they focus to educate the young about Stormy Daniels treasure chest…

And they do this because…

Because there is still a Coup D’Etat going on, and because there is still a concerted effort to overthrow this President and to destroy this Country’s Presidency, in order to not only hide the incredible success that Donald J Trump is having, in contrast to what the Dems have been doing for the last fifty years, that they have been majorly in power, directly or indirectly — but in order to take away the freedom of an independent people to choose their own Leader as this Republic, it’s laws, and it’s Constitution require.

And that’t the only deal that we need to look for protecting, in order to uncover the Orwellian nature of the Deep State’s work with the Democrats in the here and now.

This is an experiment in Self Government. A government by the people, for the people and from the people. And not a government by elites, for the elites, and from the elites…

And that is why the Obama cabal and the Bankster elites, are still working hard at their Coup D’Etat. And we get solid validation of that fact, when we see the pvssy John Kerry another elitist, along with the Clintons who have been the servants of the elites all their adult lives, undermining our Country in treasonous ways. It is a fact that when John Kerry the ex-Secretary goes and speaks with the Ayatollahs of Iran, those bloody dictators, in order to sabotage our President and our Country, and destroy our Foreign policy — it is a crime. It is treason for Kerry to bolster and support these radical  Muslim Jihadist terrorists by telling them to hold-out, because the Administration of Donald Trump will come to a sudden end, and asking the Iranian Theocratic nihilists, to wait Trump out…

And this is the proof of how low the Dems and the Elites of this country have stooped, how low they have gone, and how deep the conspiracy against our President and against our Country really is.

This is the proof of the Coup D’Etat against our country in all it’s glory. Obama’s, Kerry’s and Clinton’s collusion with the Iranian regime of nuclear terror and islamic muslim jihad, that seeks to annihilate Israel and the United States.

How low is that…

And do you think that this is the end?

It;’s not even the beginning of the end…

Because as always the fish stinks from the head on down.

But we are Americans and we know how to fight.

And of course we also know how to hold our noses and our breath too…

And we don’t need this smelly fish anymore, so we can throw it out with the garbage so the alley cats can have a go at them.

Because this time the deluded Democrats, Obama, and Hillary Clinton, are not fooling anyone.

They are certainly not fooling the American people anymore, because we have already been fooled far too many times by the silver tongued hypocrite, when back in April of 2016, President Obama and his Justice Department adopted a novel Hillary Clinton defense strategy of concocting a new type of crime for the law books.

The creative Obama White House folksy heroes, came up with the brand new fantastical crime of  — “Transmitting classified information with an intent to harm the United States.”

And indeed we were fooled.

And yes we were really fooled because we wanted to believe that such corrupt political vermin like Hillary, could never be our State Department head. And because of that we were fooled when Obama deadpanned in perfect legal English, that she and her crimes, did not cross that high threshold.

And yes, we were fooled when they came up with this novel legal banana peel: “Transmitting classified information with an intent to harm the United States.”

New Law?


Yes seri bob.

A brand spanking new law…

Made up by the Obama White House.

And of course up till then no one was claiming Hillary Clinton had committed this newly established crime, that was not even part of the code:

The newly mined crime of, transmitting classified information with an intent to harm the United States.

And thus with the friendly media, the Democrat MSM, and the left coast liberal socialist Social Media complicit help — they peddled the narrative that Hillary and her co-cospirators, could not be convicted, absent this “malicious intent.”

And thus they sold this “banana peel” of a new legal definition, in a desperate effort to make the publicly known evidence of Hillary’s crimes seem “weak” and unprosecutable…

Meanwhile, they quietly hamstrung all the FBI investigators in Hillary’s email and other crimes of corruption and pay-to-play schemes, in order to frustrate the evidence-gathering process, and to whitewash her, and thus make her the “Heir Apparent” to the corrupt Obama government, that was sending containers full of hard cash to the Ayatollahs of Iran.

But when damning proof of conspicuous criminality and conspiracy of Hillary Clinton’s State Department tenure became overwhelming, and the revelations about her criminal enterprise and the Clinton Global Initiative mounted — the Obama administration stepped in, and dismissed the whole criminal investigation.

And while they were at it — they also attempted to reclassify Hillary’s crimes as misdemeanors, by rewriting the legal statute, and making up fake laws, in order to impose an imaginary “intent standard” and thus by offering many other absurd rationalizations for not applying the statutes as written in the case of Hillary Clinton … to successfully exonerate her.

After a long time of hiding the Truth, the uncovering has begun and we now know that it wasn’t FBI Director James Comey’s decision to exonerate Hillary – but it was Obama’s.

Indeed it was a purely evil Obama decision to exonerate her, and to cover up her crimes, in order to get her to be the blotto alcoholic President Madame Secretary that can continue the Obama policies of destroying this great nation. And it makes perfect sense when a “Puffer” stoned out of his gourd sees an alcoholic hag and decided that he can control her and force her hand on every turn for the benefit of the fat cats and the banksters that were never harmed after they destroyed our economy twice in this young part of the century already.

As you might recall “No Bankers Were Harmed” during Obama’s Presidency and that is why the recovery was so weak and anemic after the Great Recession of 2008. And Obama and the Wall Street Banksters were hoping  to get some more of the same in order to continue raping the country…

And they partnered with the “For Sale” Deep State bureaucrats like Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein, and with Obama — in order to stop the possibility of changing the course of the Country, because they absolutely needed Madame President to continue their party on the back of hard working American people.

But here comes this upstart and upturns the apple cart and disrupts their game. Trump had to be stopped at any cost because he could not be bought by the banksters. So he had to be assassinated politically.

He was popular, so they concocted this evil scheme to sink his chances by presenting him as a stooge of the ancient enemy of America – Russia.

Except they forgot that the American public can read between the lines and cannot be fooled as easily as the Media think they can fool us.

So the American People overwhelmingly elected President Donald J Trump, and now they are surely going to give him another overwhelming mandate to shake down the cherry tree in these Midterm Elections of 2018…

Yet now that all the electoral cherries are all falling on President Trump’s lap, and his judges are getting elected and the Tax cuts give more equity t the American people, and the Russia collusion story has backfired — the left has gone all ape-shit over their desperate need to cover-up their humongous SpyGate crimes and the attendant political scandal.

So the crazed Democrats and the nerves Elites have all resorted to again gaslighting the President for Hillary Clinton crimes, and that’s why they are gathering the hoes, the hookers, and the pimp attorneys, in order to muddy the waters and poison the well…

But covering up this bad boy is not gonna be easy…

Screen Shot 2018-08-28 at 12.54.33 AM

The thing to understand, and what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that James Comey the altar boy that now belatedly has found religion — was out in front, but he was not calling the shots.

On the GOP side of the world, the people and their ire are in an uproar and on a daily full-throttled rampage & outrage over the revelation that former FBI Director James Comey began drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in early April of 2016 – more than two months before he delivered the statement at his now infamous July 5th of 2016 press conference.

The news appears in a letter written to new FBI Director Christopher Wray by two senior Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senator Lindsey Graham. Pundits and the Trump administration are shrieking because this indicates the decision to give the Democrat nominee a pass was clearly made long before the investigation was over, and even long before key witnesses, including Hillary Clinton herself, were interviewed.

It definitely shows, that the fix was on.

News Flash … :

This is not news, because we all knew that with Obama and Hillary Clinton, the fix was always on.

Remember Benghazi?

But we digress…

Now, let’s think about what else was going on during April of 2016:

Somehow the conspiracy to hide Hillary’s emails during her tenure as Secretary of State is full on, and they have to come up with a strategy and a plan to hide them i plain sight and to throw a bone at all of us as well via the few emails that they released…

SO they got some help from the left coast technologists like google that knows how to hide things n the cloud or above and bellow…

Our Deep State at work is further exposed as Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) the current chairman of the House Freedom Caucus when discussing the latest Strzok-Page text messages that were freshly released by the DOJ.

The latest text messages from the anti-Trump officials inside the DOJ & the FBI, show how they were both busy feeding anti-Trump articles to the press, in order to prepare the case for the spying on the Trump campaign. The newly released documents obtained by the House Oversight Committee reveal that illicit lovebirds, and office sex-mates, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, were discussing a strategy to leak unverified information to the media in an effort to damage President Trump.

When Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General, did his investigation he talked about the fact that one reporter had 13 different individuals at the FBI who were feeding him information. Literally thirteen spies, spilling the beans illegally. Thirteen spies, stool pigeons, informants breaking their oath and working against the United States Constitution, against their oaths, and against their principles of which they apparently have none.

In a total Orwellian fashion, and there was certainly a huge “official leaking” strategy going on from the FBI and from the DOJ. The most troubling aspect of all of this is that, the deep state worked overtime to confuse us.

We also know that there was no FISA court case but rather that Rod Rosenstein simply signed off on the warrants to wiretap the Trump campaign. Maybe now is the time to remember Devin Nunes memo about what they took to the FISA Court… Immediately, the FBI & DOJ started citing the media reports they caused to be generated, in order to buttress and support the salacious dossier and make it look as if it were a real thing and a verified report — which we know that was never. The salacious dossier is not valid, it was never proven, it wasn’t corroborated, it wasn’t credible, and it was simply a product of fabricated information by an “opposition policy shop” in Washington DC, called FusionGPS that was paid by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.

But the FBI & the DOJ used media reports to buttress and support the dossier, against the very principle of JUSTICE or ETHICS, and MORALITY. Instead, the FBI bosses, James Comey and his corrupt cohorts, were leaking like crazy information to the press, and the DOJ’s Rod Rosenstein of the Deep State leaking to the rest of the media, so that they were then could use the articles generated in order to buttress the very salacious dossier, as a valid and verified document that they were then using in order to obtain the FISA court warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.

Screen Shot 2018-09-10 at 10.42.00 AM

But beyond the scenes they had to exonerate Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton in order to have Madame Secretary Hillary Clinton, as the absolute and inevitable monarch of America, Madame President Hillary. The most corrupt person in American politics was going to be the Queen Hilary, because the Deep State had already decided that this evil person was deeply in the pockets of the Big Banks and the Big Money and Influence.

Thus, on April 10th of 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security, which is not an element of the criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal. The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated.

This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on, when he ultimately absolved Clinton:

On July 5th of 2016, FBI director James Comey publicly stated that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in using a private email server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the relevant criminal statute). The director acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, it was just a small percentage of the emails involved.

Obama’s April statements of 2016 are the significant ones. They told us how this was going to go. The rest is just details…

On April 10th Obama offered the obvious explicit comments about the case of Hillary: He did not want the “inevitable” Democratic nominee, the candidate he was backing to succeed him — Hillary Clinton, to be indicted. Conveniently, his remarks, inevitably echoed by FBI Director James Comey, did not mention that an intent to endanger national security was not an element of the criminal offenses Hillary Clinton was suspected of committing – in classic Obama fashion — he was urging her innocence of a strawman crime while dodging any discussion of the crimes she had actually committed.

As we also now know – but as Obama knew at the time – the president himself had communicated with Clinton over her non-secure, private communications system, using an alias. The Obama administration refused to disclose these several e-mail exchanges because they undoubtedly involve classified conversations between the president and his secretary of state. It would not have been possible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for mishandling classified information without its being clear that President Obama had engaged in the same conduct. The administration was never, ever going to allow that to happen.

What else was going on in May of 2016, while Comey was drafting his findings (even though several of the things he would purportedly “base” them on hadn’t actually happened yet)? Well — the Obama Justice Department was leaking to the Washington Post that Clinton probably would not be charged, and that her top aides, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, and even Huma Abedin’s husband, the moron pedophile Anthony Weiner, were all considered cooperating witnesses with the FBI and DOJ, rather than malignant co-conspirators and traitors to their country…


Well, I know you’ll be shocked to hear this, but it turns out the Obama Justice Department had fully adopted the theory of the case as announced by President Obama in April of 2016. The WaPo explained that, according to its sources inside the investigation, there was “scant evidence tying Clinton to criminal wrongdoing” because there was “scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in the handling of e-mails.” Like Obama, the Washington Post and its sources, neglected to mention that Mrs. Clinton’s felonies did not require proof of “malicious intent” or any purpose to harm the United States – just that she willfully transmitted classified information, was grossly negligent in handling it, and withheld or destroyed government records.

The Obama Justice Department was simultaneously barring the FBI from asking Mills questions that went to the heart of the e-mails investigation – questions about the process by which Clinton and her underlings decided which of her 60,000 e-mails to surrender to the State Department, and which would be withheld (it ended up being about 33,000) as purportedly “private” although a goodly percentage were not.

This was the start of a series of Justice Department shenanigans we would come to learn about: Cutting off key areas of inquiry; cutting inexplicable immunity deals; declining to use the grand jury to compel evidence; agreeing to limit searches of computers, in order to miss key time-frames when obstruction occurred; agreeing to destroy physical evidence, as in laptop computers; failing to charge and squeeze witnesses who made patently false statements; allowing subjects of the investigation to act as lawyers for other subjects of the investigation in order to promote the charade that some evidence was off-limits due to the attorney-client privilege; and so on.

There is a way – a notoriously aggressive way – that the Justice Department and FBI go about their business when they are trying to make a case. That was obviously not the case here, boucle here, with Hillary Clinton, they were trying to “unmake” a case.

Knowing all these things, as we now do and as we have for a year — I’m baffled by complaints that James Comey allegedly made “his” decision not to charge Clinton before key witnesses were interviewed. The main issue is not that witnesses hadn’t been questioned; it is that by April 2016, restraints were already in place to ensure that witness interviews would be fruitless, and that any incriminating information they accidentally turned up would be ignored or buried.

The decision not to indict Hillary Clinton was not made by then-FBI Director Comey. It was made by President Obama and his Justice Department – Comey’s superiors. If you want to say Comey went along for the ride rather than bucking the tide, as he concedes doing when Lynch directed him to call the Clinton probe a “matter,” not an “investigation”, that’s fair. But the fact that James Comey already knew in April of 2016, what he would say in July of 2016, has long been perfectly obvious. The Obama administration was going to follow its leader. What Comey ultimately stated was just a repeat of what Obama was openly saying in April 2016, and what the whole of Obama’s Justice Department was leaking to the press in May of the same year 2016.

The bottom line is this: In April of 2016, President Obama and his Justice Department adopted a Hillary Clinton defense strategy of concocting a crime no one was claiming Clinton had committed: to wit, transmitting classified information with an intent to harm the United States. With media-Democrat complex help, they peddled the narrative that she could not be convicted absent this “malicious intent,” in a desperate effort to make the publicly known evidence seem weak. Meanwhile, they quietly hamstrung FBI case investigators in order to frustrate the evidence-gathering process. When damning proof nevertheless mounted, the Obama administration dismissed the whole debacle by rewriting the statute (to impose an imaginary intent standard) and by offering absurd rationalizations for not applying the statute as written.

That plan was in place and already being implemented when Director Comey began drafting the “findings” he would announce months later. But it was not Comey’s plan.

It was Obama’s plan to exonerate Hillary Clinton from the beginning…


Dr Churchill


Thinking hard and understanding the circuitous route by which the Deep State and the Bureaucrats of the Security Agencies of the United States acted — makes it clear that they work like any other fascist security apparatus, and like the very machinery of a Totalitarian State.

This is what patriots need to rebel against, and overthrow, the same way that the Citizens of a Democracy sought to overthrow the STAZI, and the GESTAPO, and the KGB, in other fascist countries, because when the politicians find it comforting to use this Orwellian apparatus to steal the Liberty of the people, and to enslave them — it is incumbent upon the American Citizen to seek redress through armed rebellion and overthrow of that tyrannical secret government.

And I fully understand that this is a difficult subject to comprehend.

So that is why I find it so important to read and understand the subtext of Orwell’s book 1984. And while we are at it, please read his other book Animal Farm, where the President of a country, or as the case might be the leader of the revolution — in our case Donald Trump, and in the book, the old horse that was elected by the people to lead them to Freedom, gets sold to the glue factory to be killed and his meat to become conserves, whereas his bones to be made into glue..

It is also important here to understand the depth of hate and the magnitude of depravity that the Democrats carry against the principles and against the people of our country.

Because that’s the crux of the issue here, and that is why evil fools like Hillary Clinton talk about despising our fellow citizens…

Because that person hates herself as any alcoholic does. So it is not surprising this alcoholic hag, carries such deep despair about our Republic, when we see how cheaply she and the Democrats and their corrupt security service bureaucrats sold our Constitution down the river — when they conspired and colluded to spy and sabotage another Presidential candidate that was not Madame Secretary.

And why do you think the leftists do all that for?

For their indelible lust of power, and for their insatiable thirst of money, wealth, & personal gain.

Nothing else.

No lofty ideals here.


Only theft & rampage.

And maybe some rape & pillage too.

Rape & pillage is big business amongst the Democrats, at least when Bill Clinton is around in the midst of the “loot party” that is really what they call the Democratic party of America all those Democratic party insiders like Donna Brazile, Hillary Clinton, and the unforgettable Debbie Wasserman Schultz…

The “Loot Party” is right.

Yet for me the Democrats now resemble more the “Loon Party” rather than the “Loot Party” — but that’s another days story.


Screen Shot 2018-09-16 at 9.14.19 PM.png


Posted by: Dr Churchill | August 27, 2018

Impeach This!

“The fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists”
–Winston Churchill and George Orwell. (This is a quote that could definitely have come out of the mouth of either one of these men, or maybe both.)

“Fascism, Nazism, Communism and Socialism are only superficial variations of the same monstrous theme — collectivism.”
–Ayn Rand.

Incredibly as early as 1925, Winston Churchill alerted us to the effects of Democratic Socialism in America and beyond, through his lectures and articles about the Mass Effects of Collectivization, and the menacing threat of Socialism ushered into the European scene by Mr Hitler and Mr Mussolini.

Ayn Rand, has also warned us in 1944, about the slippery slope that America was taking and falling down towards fascism — via the rose lined road of the Democratic party’s nascent romance with Socialism, that we’ve seen blooming all over America today.

Any ideology at the point of the gun, at the spear of bayonets, and at the business end of the blackshirt’s club, is pure evil, and plain fascism. No matter how many flowers you dress that turd with…

Screen Shot 2018-08-22 at 7.24.36 AM

This theme was first brought on to the attention of the world, by Winston Churchill’s article about the Mass Effects of Collectivism, and he would expand upon this insight in various articles, and most notably in two of his speeches in America — the last one being the most famous one amongst the two, as it was delivered after the war, and it was about the Iron Curtain. This amazing speech of prescient awareness, that he delivered in Missouri at the beginnings of the Cold War, begs to be discussed today again.

Similarly Ayn Rand delivered two lectures at the Ford Hall Forum in Boston: First was “The Fascist New Frontier” on December 16th of 1962, that was also published as a booklet by the Nathaniel Branden Institute in 1963; and second was “The New Fascism: Rule by Consensus” delivered on April 18th of 1965, and published as Chapter 20 in “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal” — CUI, by New American Library in 1967.

Of course both Winston Churchill and Ayn Rand flat out rejected the traditional left/right dualistic mirror image dichotomy, that sanctifies socialism and communism, and presents fascism as simply a right wing ideology issue. Because, for Ayn Rand and Winston Churchill — the singularity is not from the right wing, but rather stems from the socialists and the labour Democrats, who are the extreme version of leftwing ideology. And because the Democrat party ideology of today, is a virulent form of fascism which invariably is the extreme version of any and all leftist ideology. Indeed, in The Ayn Rand Letter (Nov. 8, 1971) she characterized fascism as “socialism for big business.” Both are variants of statism, in contrast to a free country based on individual rights and laissez-faire capitalism. As Rand put it in “Conservativism: An Obituary” (CUI, Chapter 19): “The world conflict of today is the conflict of the individual against the state, the same conflict that has been fought throughout mankind’s history. The names change, but the essence—and the results—remain the same, whether it is the individual against feudalism, or against absolute monarchy, or against communism or fascism or Nazism or socialism or the welfare state.”

The placement of socialism and fascism at opposite ends of a political spectrum serves a nefarious purpose, according to Rand. It serves to buttress the case that we must avoid “extremism” and choose the sensible middle course of a “mixed economy.” Quoting from “‘Extremism,’ Or The Art of Smearing” (CUI, Chapter 17): “If it were true that dictatorship is inevitable and that fascism and communism are the two “extremes” at the opposite ends of our course, then what is the safest place to choose? Why, the middle of the road. The safely undefined, indeterminate, mixed-economy, “moderate” middle—with a “moderate” amount of government favors and special privileges to the rich and a “moderate” amount of government handouts to the poor—with a “moderate” respect for rights and a “moderate” degree of brute force—with a “moderate” amount of freedom and a “moderate” amount of slavery—with a “moderate” degree of justice and a “moderate” degree of injustice—with a “moderate” amount of security and a “moderate” amount of terror—and with a moderate degree of tolerance for all, except those “extremists” who uphold principles, consistency, objectivity, morality and who refuse to compromise.”

In both of her major articles on fascism and cited above, Ayn Rand distinguished between fascism and socialism by noting a rather technical (and ultimately inconsequential) difference in their approaches to private property. Here is the relevant passage from “The New Fascism: Rule by Consensus”: “Observe that both “socialism” and “fascism” involve the issue of property rights. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Observe the difference in those two theories: socialism negates private property rights altogether, and advocates “the vesting of ownership and control” in the community as a whole, i.e., in the state; fascism leaves ownership in the hands of private individuals, but transfers control of the property to the government.”

Ownership without control is a contradiction in terms: “It means “property,” without the right to use it or to dispose of it. It means that the citizens retain the responsibility of holding property, without any of its advantages, while the government acquires all the advantages without any of the responsibility.”

Screen Shot 2018-08-17 at 12.44.42 PM

“In this respect, socialism is the more honest of the two theories. I say “more honest,” not “better”—because, in practice, there is no difference between them: both come from the same collectivist-statist principle, both negate individual rights and subordinate the individual to the collective, both deliver the livelihood and the lives of the citizens into the power of an omnipotent government —and the differences between them are only a matter of time, degree, and superficial detail, such as the choice of slogans by which the rulers delude their enslaved subjects.”

Contrary to many conservative commentators during the 1960s, Rand maintained that America was drifting toward fascism, not socialism, and that this descent was virtually inevitable in a mixed economy. “A mixed economy is an explosive, untenable mixture of two opposite elements,” freedom and statism, “which cannot remain stable, but must ultimately go one way or the other” (“‘Extremism,’ or The Art of Smearing”). Economic controls generate their own problems, and with these problems come demands for additional controls—so either those controls must be abolished or a mixed economy will eventually degenerate into a form of economic dictatorship. Rand conceded that most American advocates of the welfare state “are not socialists, that they never advocated or intended the socialization of private property.” These welfare-statists “want to ‘preserve’ private property” while calling for greater government control over such property. “But that is the fundamental characteristic of fascism.”

Rand gave us some of the finest analyses of a mixed economy—its premises, implications, and long-range consequences—ever penned by a free-market advocate. In “The New Fascism,” for example, she compared a mixed economy to a system that operates by the law of the jungle, a system in which “no one’s interests are safe, everyone’s interests are on a public auction block, and anything goes for anyone who can get away with it.” A mixed economy divides a country “into an ever-growing number of enemy camps, into economic groups fighting one another for self preservation in an indeterminate mixture of defense and offense.” Although Rand did not invoke Thomas Hobbes in this context, it is safe to say that the economic “chaos” of a mixed economy resembles the Hobbesian war of all against all in a state of nature, a system in which interest groups feel the need to screw others before they get screwed themselves.

A mixed economy is ruled by pressure groups. It is an amoral, institutionalized civil war of special interests and lobbies, all fighting to seize a momentary control of the legislative machinery, to extort some special privilege at one another’s expense by an act of government—i.e., by force.

Screen Shot 2018-08-21 at 3.41.41 PM

Of course, Rand never claimed that America had degenerated into full-blown fascism, because she held that freedom of speech was the bright red line in this respect, but she did believe that the fundamental premise of the “altruist-collectivist” morality—the foundation of all collectivist regimes, including fascism — was accepted and preached by modern liberals and conservatives alike.

Yet today’s attacks on Free Speech by all the political correctness SS brigades of the Democrat party, and of the AntiFa variants of Brown Shirts, is proof that all those who mistakenly dub Rand a “conservative” should read “Conservatism: An Obituary” [CUI, Chapter 19], a scathing critique in which she accused most all, conservative leaders of “moral treason.” Because in some respects Ayn Rand detested modern conservatives more than she detested modern liberals, since she was especially contemptuous of those conservatives who attempted to justify capitalism by appealing to religion or to tradition. Whereas Ayn Rand illustrated her point in “The Fascist New Frontier,” a polemical tour de force aimed at President Kennedy and his administration, she also expressed her contempt for his opponents and she showed the JFK was not all bad for America, especially in his strong defense of the Constitution and the Rights emanating out of it, with Free Speech being the most important one.

As if channeling the American Democrat party of today and the Bernie Sanders leftist socialist wing of it — indeed — Ayn Rand began her 1962 lecture by quoting passages from the 1920 political platform of the German Nazi Party, including demands for “an end to the power of the financial interests,” “profit sharing in big business,” “a broad extension of care for the aged,” the “improvement of public health” by government, “an all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education,” and so forth. All such welfare-state measures, this platform concluded, “can only proceed from within on the foundation of “The Common Good Before the Individual Good.”

Screen Shot 2018-08-18 at 3.51.49 PM

Rand had no problem quoting similar proposals and sentiments from President Kennedy and members of his administration, such as Kennedy’s celebrated remark, “And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what America will do for you — ask what you can do for your country.” The particulars of Rand’s speech will come as no surprise to those familiar with her ideas, but I wish to call attention to her final remarks about the meaning of “the public interest.” As used by Kennedy and other politicians, both Democrat and Republican, this fuzzy phrase has little if any meaning, except to indicate that individuals have a duty to sacrifice their interests for the sake of a greater, undefined good, as determined by those who wield the brute force of political power. Rand then stated what she regarded as the only coherent meaning of “the public interest.”

There is no such thing as “the public interest” except as the sum of the interests of individual men. And the basic, common interest of all men — all rational men — is freedom. Freedom is the first requirement of “the public interest” — not what men do when they are free, but that they “be free.”

Because all human achievements rest on that foundation of Liberty — and cannot exist without Freedom.

The principles of a free, non-coercive social system are the only form of “the public interest.”

Rand was exactly on point on many issues. Indeed, if we substitute “President Obama” for “President Kennedy” or “President Johnson,” many of her points would be even more pertinent today than they were during the 1960s.

Unfortunately, the ideological sewer of American politics today, has become even more foul, than it was in Rand’s day, but Rand did what she could to reverse the trend, and no one can say that she didn’t warn us, because her clarion call still rings true today through Rand’s contention that America is sliding down a slippery slope towards fascism, via socialism, collectivism, mass effects, and the extremes of the Democratic party’s leftwing, masquerading as the black shirted variety of fascists, who they happen to be in reality.

And yet in an awesome, comedic, cynical, and yet all too Orwellian fashion, the fascists of today call themselves AntiFascists — having failed to realize that this is not the calendar year of 1984… and of course having absolutely zero sense of humor or intelligence.

Screen Shot 2018-08-14 at 8.44.45 PM

So now let us turn to reading the Winston Churchill articles about the virulent fascist ideology of the sliding slope towards socialism that America experiences today because of the Democrat party, and it’s black shirted thugs, domestic terrorists, who act in concert with the leftwing of this racists plantation party that believe in control of the people first and foremost.

My grandfather Winston Churchill warned us almost a century ago to look through the cracks and see the looming evil… because he saw that evil ahead of anyone else in the face of that other Bernie Sanders type Socialist — Adolf Hitler, who started his career as a goodly two shoes national socialist with a similar agenda to today’s Democrat party. and to our good friend Bernie Sanders…

Winston Churchill, was indeed the first political man in Europe, to be able to take the full measure of that evil small man from Munich, Adolf Hitler, whom he sarcastically called thereafter, “The Deluded House Painter” and to also be able to discern the depth of hate & inequity, that Hitler harbored within his black heart.

Same as it is for us today — only when we read the strong warnings of Winston on the “Mass Effects in Modern Life” of 1925 — we wake up, and face socialism with open eyes, and thereafter can’t help but be revulsed, by today’s Democrat party of America and it’s evil ways that harbor all the similarities to Hitler’s youth and his followers, and whose people are the same as the evil socialists and black-shirted fascists of AntiFa today.

And perhaps this realization will help us to begin praying devoutly towards preventing such tragedy of ever visit America, the land of Liberty’s last stand.

But  in order to “Save America” we ought to fight stoutly and pray devoutly each and every day — because things are too far gone in the wrong direction already.

Mass Effects

Mass Effects in Modern Life, 1925

–Winston Spencer Churchill

“In the march of events ordered and guided by eminent men, or do our leaders merely fall into their places at the heads of the moving columns? Is human progress the result of the resolves and deeds of individuals, or are these resolves and deeds only the outcome of time and circumstance? Is History the chronicle of famous men and women, or only of their responses to the tides, tendencies and opportunities of their age? Do we owe the ideals and wisdom that make our world to the glorious few, or to the patient anonymous innumerable many? The question has only to be posed to be answered. We have but to let the mind’s eye skim back over the story of nations, indeed to review the experience of our own small lives, to observe the decisive part which accident and chance play at every moment. If this or that had been otherwise, if this instruction had not been given, if that blow had not been struck, if that horse had not stumbled, if we had not met that woman, or missed or caught that train, the whole course of our lives would have been changed; and with our lives the lives of others, until gradually, in ever-widening circles, the movement of the world itself would have been affected. And if this be true of the daily experience of ordinary average people, how much more potent must be the deflection which the Master Teachers, Thinkers, Discoverers, Commanders have imparted at every stage. True, they require their background, their atmosphere, their opportunity; but these were also the leverages which magnified their power. I have no hesitation in ranging myself with those who view the past history of the world mainly as the tale of exceptional human beings, whose thoughts, actions, qualities, virtues, triumphs, weaknesses and crimes have dominated the fortunes of the race. But we may now ask ourselves whether powerful changes are not coming to pass, are not already in progress or indeed far advanced. Is not mankind already escaping from the control of individuals? Are not our affairs increasingly being settled by mass processes? Are not modern conditions at any rate throughout the English-speaking communities hostile to the development of outstanding personalities and to their influence upon events: and lastly if this be true, will it be for our greater good and glory? These questions merit some examination from thoughtful people.

Certainly we see around us today a marked lack of individual leadership. The late Mr. John Morley, statesman and philanthropist, man of letters and man of affairs, some years ago toward the close of his life delivered an oration in which he drew attention to the decline in the personal eminence of the leaders in almost all the important spheres of thought and art. He contrasted the heads of the great professions in the early twentieth century with those who had shone in the mid-Victorian era. He spoke of the vacant Thrones in Philosophy, History, Economics, Oratory, Statecraft, Poetry, Literature, Painting, Sculpture, and Music, which stood on every side. He pointed, as far as possible without offence, to the array of blameless mediocrities who strutted conscientiously around the seats of the mighty decked in their discarded mantles and insignia. The pith and justice of these reflections were unwelcome, but not to be denied. They are no less applicable to the United States. With every natural wish to be complimentary to our own age and generation, with every warning against singing the praises of former times, it is difficult to marshal today in any part of the English-speaking world an assembly of notables who either in distinction or achievement can compare with those to whom our grandfathers so gladly paid attention and tribute.

It must be admitted that in one great sphere the thrones are neither vacant nor occupied by pygmies. Science in all its forms surpasses itself every year. The body of knowledge ever accumulating is immediately interchanged and the quality and fidelity of the research never flags. But here again the mass effect largely suppresses the individual achievement. The throne is occupied; but by a throng.

In part we are conscious of the enormous processes of collectivization which are at work among us. We have long seen the old family business, where the master was in direct personal touch with his workmen, swept out of existence or absorbed by powerful companies, which in their turn are swallowed by mammoth trusts. We have found in these processes, whatever hardships they may have caused to individuals, immense economic and social advantages. The magic of mass production has carried all before it. The public have a cheaper and even better article or a superior service; the workmen have better wages and greater security.

The results upon national character and psychology are more questionable. We are witnessing a great diminution in the number of independent people who had some standing of their own, albeit a small one, and who if they conducted their affairs with reasonable prudence could live by no man’s leave underneath the law. They may be better off as the salaried officials of great corporations; but they have lost in forethought, in initiative, in contrivance, in freedom and in effective civic status.

These instances are but typical of what is taking place in almost every sphere of modern industrial life, and of what must take place with remorseless persistency, if we are to enjoy the material blessings which scientific and organized civilization is ready to bestow in measureless abundance.

In part, again, these changes are unconscious. Public opinion is formed and expressed by machinery. The newspapers do an immense amount of thinking for the average man and woman. In fact they supply them with such a continuous stream of standardized opinion, borne along upon an equally inexhaustible flood of news and sensation, collected from every part of the world every hour of the day, that there is neither the need nor the leisure for personal reflection. All this is but a part of a tremendous educating process. But it is an education which passes in at one ear and out at the other. It is an education at once universal and superficial. It produces enormous numbers of standardized citizens, all equipped with regulation opinions, prejudices and sentiments, according to their class or party. It may eventually lead to a reasonable, urbane and highly serviceable society. It may draw in its wake a mass culture enjoyed by countless millions to whom such pleasures were formerly unknown. We must not forget the enormous circulations at cheap prices of the greatest books of the world, which is a feature of modern life in civilized countries, and nowhere more than in the United States. But this great diffusion of knowledge, information and light reading of all kinds may, while it opens new pleasures to humanity and appreciably raises the general level of intelligence, be destructive of those conditions of personal stress and mental effort to which the masterpieces of the human mind are due.

It is a curious fact that the Russian Bolsheviks, in carrying by compulsion mass conceptions to their utmost extreme, seem to have lost not only the guidance of great personalities, but even the economic fertility of the process itself. The Communist theme aims at universal standardization. The individual becomes a function: the community is alone of interest: mass thoughts dictated and propagated by the rulers are the only thoughts deemed respectable. No one is to think of himself as an immortal spirit, clothed in the flesh, but sovereign, unique, indestructible. No one is to think of himself even as that harmonious integrity of mind, soul and body, which, take it as you will, may claim to be the Lord of Creation. Subhuman goals and ideals are set before these Asiastic millions. The Beehive? No, for there must be no queen and no honey, or at least no honey for others. In Soviet Russia we have a society which seeks to model itself upon the Ant. There is not one single social or economic principle or concept in the philosophy of the Russian Bolshevik which has not been realized, carried into action, and enshrined in immutable laws a million years ago by the White Ant.

But human nature is more intractable than ant-nature. The explosive variations of its phenomena disturb the smooth working out of the laws and forces which have subjugated the White Ant. It is at once the safeguard and the glory of mankind that they are easy to lead and hard to drive. So the Bolsheviks, having attempted by tyranny and by terror to establish the most complete form of mass life and collectivism of which history bears record, have not only lost the distinction of individuals, but have not even made the nationalization of life and industry pay. We have not much to learn from them, except what to avoid.

Mass effects and their reactions are of course more pronounced in the leading nations than in more backward and primitive communities. In Great Britain, the United States, Germany, and France, the decline in personal pre-eminence is much more plainly visible than in societies which have less wealth, less power, less freedom. The great emancipated nations seem to have become largely independent of famous guides and guardians. They no longer rely upon the Hero, the Commander, or the Teacher as they did in bygone rugged ages, or as the less advanced peoples do today. They wend their way ponderously, unthinkingly, blindly, but nevertheless surely and irresistibly towards goals which are ill-defined and yet magnetic. Is it then true that civilization and democracy, when sufficiently developed, will increasingly dispense with personal direction; that they mean to find their own way for themselves; and that they are capable of finding the right way? Or are they already going wrong? Are they off the track? Have they quitted the stern, narrow high-roads which alone lead to glorious destinies and survival? Is what we now see in the leading democracies merely a diffusion and squandering of the accumulated wisdom and treasure of the past? Are we blundering on together in myriad companies, like innumerable swarms of locusts, chirping and devouring towards the salt sea, or towards some vast incinerator of shams and fallacies? Or have we for the first time reached those uplands whence all of us, even the humblest and silliest equally with the best, can discern for ourselves the beacon lights? Surely such an inquiry deserves an idle hour.

In no field of man’s activities is the tendency to mass effects and the suppression of the individual more evident than in modern war. The Armageddon through which we have recently passed displays the almost complete elimination of personal guidance. It was the largest and the latest of all wars. It was also the worst, the most destructive, and in many ways the most ruthless. Now that it is over we look back, and with minute and searching care seek to find its criminals and its heroes. Where are they? Where are the villains who made the War? Where are the deliverers who ended it? Facts without number, growing libraries, clouds of contemporary witnesses, methods of assembling and analyzing evidence never before possessed or used among men are at our disposal. The quest is keen. We ought to know; we mean to know. Smarting under our wounds, enraged by our injuries, amazed by our wonderful exertions and achievements, conscious of our authority, we demand to know the truth, and to fix the responsibilities. Our halters and our laurels are ready and abundant.

But what is the answer? There is no answer. On the one hand, the accusations eagerly pressed, now against this man or Government or nation, now against that, seem to dissipate themselves as the indictment proceeds. On the other, as the eager claimants for the honour of being the man, the Government, the nation THAT ACTUALLY WON THE WAR multiply and as their self-advocacy becomes more voluble, more strident, we feel less and less convinced. The Muse of History to whom we all so confidently appeal has become a Sphinx. A sad, half-mocking smile flickers on her stone war-scarred lineaments. While we gaze, we feel that the day will never come when we shall learn the answer for which we have clamoured. Meanwhile the halters rot and the laurels fade. Both the making and the winning of the most terrible and the most recent of earthly struggles seems to have been a co-operative affair!

Modern conditions do not lend themselves to the production of the heroic or super-dominant type. On the whole they are fatal to pose. The robes, the wigs, the ceremonies, the grades that fortified the public men and ruling functionaries of former centuries have fallen into disuse in every country. Even the Divinity that doth hedge a King is considered out of place except on purely official occasions. Sovereigns are admired for their free and easy manners, their readiness to mingle with all classes, their matter-of-fact work-a-day air, their dislike of pomp and ritual. The Minister or President at the head of some immense sphere of business, whose practical decisions from hour to hour settle so many important things, is no longer a figure of mystery and awe. On the contrary he is looked upon and, what is more important for our present purpose, looks upon himself as quite an ordinary fellow, who happens to be charged for the time being with a peculiar kind of large-scale work. He hustles along with the crowd in the public conveyances, or attired in plus fours waits his turn upon the links. All this is very jolly, and a refreshing contrast to the ridiculous airs and graces of the periwigged potentates of other generations. The question is whether the sense of leadership, and the commanding attitude towards men and affairs, are likely to arise from such simple and unpretentious customs and habits of mind; and further, whether our public affairs will now for the future run on quite happily without leaders who by their training and situation, no less than by their abilities, feel themselves to be uplifted above the general mass.

The intense light of war illuminates as usual this topic more clearly than the comfortable humdrum glow of peace. We see the modern commander entirely divorced from the heroic aspect by the physical conditions which have overwhelmed his art. No longer will Hannibal and Caesar, Turenne and Marlborough, Frederick and Napoleon, sit their horses on the battlefield and by their words and gestures direct and dominate between dawn and dusk the course of a supreme event. No longer will their fame and presence cheer their struggling soldiers. No longer will they share their perils, rekindle their spirits and restore the day. They will not be there. They have been banished from the fighting scene, together with their plumes, standards and breastplates. The lion-hearted warrior, whose keen eye detected the weakness in the foeman’s line, whose resolve outlasted all the strains of battle, whose mere arrival at some critical point turned the tide of conflict, has disappeared. Instead our Generals are to be found on the day of battle at their desks in their offices fifty or sixty miles from the front, anxiously listening to the trickle of the telephone for all the world as if they were speculators with large holdings when the market is disturbed.

All very right and worthy. They are at their posts. Where else, indeed, should they be? The tape-machine ticks are recording in blood-red ink that railways are down or utilities up, that a bank has broken here, and a great fortune has been captured there. Calm sits the General; he is a high-souled speculator. He is experienced in finance. He has survived many market crashes. His reserves are ample and mobile. He watches for the proper moment, or proper day for battles now last for months and then launches them to the attack. He is a fine tactician, and knows the wiles of bull and bear, of attack and defence, to a nicety. His commands are uttered with decision. Sell fifty thousand of this. Buy at the market a hundred thousand of that. Ah! No, we are on the wrong track. It is not shares he is dealing in. It is the lives of scores of thousands of men. To look at him at work in his office you would never have believed that he was fighting a battle in command of armies ten times as large and a hundred times as powerful as any that Napoleon led. We must praise him if he does his work well, if he sends the right messages, and spends the right troops, and buys the best positions. But it is hard to feel that he is the hero. No; he is not the hero. He is the manager of a stock-market, or a stock-yard.

The obliteration of the personal factor in war, the stripping from high commanders of all the drama of the battlefield, the reducing of their highest function to pure office work, will have profound effects upon sentiment and opinion. Hitherto the great captain has been rightly revered as the genius who by the firmness of his character, and by the mysterious harmonies and inspirations of his nature, could rule the storm. He did it himself; and no one else could do it so well. He conquered there and then. Often he fell beneath the bolts and the balls, saviour of his native land. Now, however illogical it may seem and even unjust, his glamour and honours will not readily descend upon our calculating friend at the telephone. This worthy must assuredly be rewarded as a useful citizen, and a faithful perspicacious public servant; but not as a hero. The heroes of modern war lie out in the cratered fields, mangled, stifled, scarred; and there are too many of them for exceptional honours. It is mass suffering, mass sacrifice, mass victory. The glory which plays upon the immense scenes of carnage is diffused. No more the blaze of triumph irradiates the helmets of the chiefs. There is only the pale light of a rainy dawn by which forty miles of batteries recommence their fire, and another score of divisions flounder to their death in mud and poison gas.

That was the last war. The wars of the future will be even less romantic and picturesque. They will apparently be the wars not of armies but of whole populations. Men, women and children, old and feeble, soldiers and civilians, sick and wounded � all will be exposed, so we are told, to aerial bombardment, that is to say, to mass destruction by lethal vapour. There will not be much glory for the General in this process. My gardener last spring exterminated seven wasps’ nests. He did his work most efficiently. He chose the right poison. He measured the exact amount. He put it stealthily in the right place, at the right time. The entire communities were destroyed. Not even one wasp got near enough to sting him. It was his duty and he performed it well. But I am not going to regard him as a hero.

So when some spectacled brass hat of a future world-agony has extinguished some London or Paris, some Tokyo or San Francisco, by pressing a button, or putting his initials neatly at the bottom of a piece of foolscap, he will have to wait a long time for fame and glory. Even the flashlights of the photographers in the national Ministry of Propaganda will be only a partial compensation. Still our Commander-in-Chief may be a man of exemplary character, most painstaking and thorough in his profession. He may only be doing what in all the circumstances some one or other would have to do. It seems rather hard that he should receive none of the glory which in former ages would have been the attribute of his office and the consequence of his success. But this is one of the mass effects of modern life and science. He will have to put up with it.

From this will follow blessed reactions. The idea of war will become loathsome to humanity. The military leader will cease to be a figure of romance and fame. Youth will no longer be attracted to such careers. Poets will not sing nor sculptors chisel the deeds of conquerors. It may well be that the chemist will carry off what credit can be found. The budding Napoleons will go into business, and the civilization of the world will stand on a surer basis. We need not waste our tears on the mass effects in war. Let us return to those of peace.

Can modern communities do without great men? Can they dispense with hero-worship? Can they provide a larger wisdom, a nobler sentiment, a more vigorous action, by collective processes, than were ever got from the Titans? Can nations remain healthy, can all nations draw together, in a world whose brightest stars are film stars and whose gods are sitting in the gallery? Can the spirit of man emit the vital spark by machinery? Will the new problems of successive generations be solved successfully by the common sense of most, by party caucuses, by Assemblies whose babble is no longer heeded? Or will there be some big hitch in the forward march of mankind, some intolerable block in the traffic, some vain wandering into the wilderness; and will not then the need for a personal chief become the mass desire?

We see a restlessness around us already. The cry of Measures, not Men no longer commands universal sympathy. There is a sense of vacancy and of fatuity, of incompleteness. We miss our giants. We are sorry that their age is past. The general levels of intelligence and of knowledge have risen. We are upon a high plateau. A peak of 10,000 feet above the old sea-level is scarcely noticeable. There are so many such eminences that we hardly bother about them. The region seems healthy, but the scenery is unimpressive. We mourn the towering grandeur which surrounded and cheered our long painful ascent. Ah! If we could only find some new enormous berg rising towards the heavens as high above our plateau as those old mountains down below rose above the plains and marshes! We want a monarch peak, with base enormous, whose summit is for ever hidden from our eyes by clouds, and down whose precipices cataracts of sparkling waters thunder. Unhappily the democratic plateau or platform does not keep that article in stock. Perhaps something like it might be worked up by playing spotlights upon pillars of smoke or gas and using the loud-speaker apparatus. But we soon see through these pretences.

No, we must take the loss with the gain. On the uplands there are no fine peaks. We must do without them while we stay there. Of course we could always, if we wished, go down again into the plains and valleys out of which we have climbed. We may even wander thither unwittingly. We may slide there. We may be pushed there. There are still many powerful nations dwelling at these lower levels, some contentedly, some even proudly. They often declare that life in the valleys is preferable. There is, they say, more variety, more beauty, more grace, more dignity, more true health and fertility than upon the arid highlands. They say this middle situation is better suited to human nature. The arts flourish there, and science need not be absent. Moreover, it is pleasing to look back over the plains and morasses through which our path has lain in the past, and remember in tradition the great years of pilgrimage. Then they point to the frowning crag, their venerated El Capitan or Il Duce, casting its majestic shadow in the evening light; and ask whether we have anything like that up there.

We certainly have not.”

–Winston Churchill 1925

Read these words above carefully and reread them before you make up your mind with way to turn and vote and these upcoming elections in America of 2018.



Dr Churchill


As Free People, and resting in liberty and Valor — feel free to join us in Vantage WA on September 14th and 15th for a celebration of Winston Churchill’s 80th anniversary edition of the conference “Arms & Covenant”

You can register for the “God, Arms & Covenant” Conference here:

And also register at the Churchill Society here:

Bellevue Freedom Ride to Join the “God, Arms, & Covenant, Conference” in Vantage

Friday, Sep 14, 2018, 5:00 PM

Bellevue Square
575 Bellevue Square Bellevue, WA

14 Churchillians Attending

The Freedom Ride will assemble and depart from the Bellevue Square at the southern parking lot, by 4th Avenue and Bellevue Way. This is the 80th anniversary edition of the “GOD, ARMS, & COVENANT” conference, started by Winston Churchill in 1938 to fight-off the National Socialists, the Defeatists, the Appeasers, the Fascists, and the Atheists, in …

Check out this Meetup →


And should you feel like supporting Dr Churchill through this time of trials and tribulations, and want to help him with his medical bills stemming from the head trauma and brain surgery that was caused by the AntiFa attack against him during one of his public speeches inside Microsoft Co headquarter campus in Redmond WA — here it goes:

And much later one has to remember the “Sinews of Peace” speech that Winston delivered in 1946 in Missouri, beaux it describes what is happening today again, only this time in South East Asia because of China.

On March 5, 1946, Sir Winston Churchill visited the small and beautiful Westminster College in the tiny little town of Fulton Missouri, and delivered “Sinews of Peace,” a message heard round the world that went down in history as the “Iron Curtain Speech.” “From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an “iron curtain” has descended across the continent…

Posted by: Dr Churchill | August 24, 2018

SpyGate – Chapter Fifty One – “Fake News”


This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Fifty One
“Fake News”

If you were to hear the MSM, watch CNN or MSNBC, or follow Social Media — you would be convinced that the President has already been impeached for something or other…

That part of the offense, the reason for, and the process of impeachment is never made clear…

But in the minds of the snowflakes — of course, the 45th has been impeached, is being impeached, or has got to be impeached, and of course that’s the only thing that matters.

And that is the essence of all the Fake News of today — because as it turns out, all the top legal experts agree that no matter what, Trump is not going to be impeached.

Not for this Cohen matter, or for any of all that Non-Russian matters, or for any financial matters of his errant ex-colleagues — any time soon. Crimes by association are not impeachable offenses. This is not NAZI Germany under Adolf Hitler where the whole family disappears if one member committed a crime against the Fuhrer — no matter how the Democrats would have liked this to be the case, as their socialistic views and current policies, edge closer and closer, to the National Socialism of the fvckin Adolf Hitler during the 1930’s, the holocaust, and beyond.

As a matter of fact no matter how crazed and unhinged the Democrat American NAZIs become, no matter how unbridled the SS corps of angry Democrats led by the dirty cop Robert Mueller act, and no matter how difficult the “Trial of Jesus” that the President is subjected to — this Giant amongst Men, will never quit, he will never flinch, nor will he give in, to the petty barbers from the dwarves that surround him. Trump is not Lilliput and he is never going to be weakened or impeached. As a matter of fact, he will persevere, he will keep the faith, and by the Grace of God — he will execute the best policies for America and he will go on to finish his two terms with the utmost success, before he retires to his gilded winter palace of Mar-A-Lago to perfect his golf game and to get his much needed R&R.

Still, all that withstanding, or not — it is now clear as the day is fresh, that Cohen’s hush-money paid to hoes, porns, and pros, shouldn’t and couldn’t lead to indictment, criminal charges, or impeachment, for the 45th President of the United States.

So the snowflakes all around, should get back to waterboarding themselves, or stoning with medical ganza, or stoking up with their crack pipes — all in their despairing moments of untold pain for their loss as they are still pining for alcoholic hag Hillary Clinton. Their heads are exploding all over, because even though on August 21st Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, pled guilty to charges of tax evasion and banking fraud — and then tried to hoist his own crimes to the 45th — none of that implicates the President.

But for the fake news — of course it was all a violent storm in a tea cup, that indeed caused a tremor that rocked the day’s political windows of the talking heads on the TV-lands, when Cohen confessed to criminal violations of campaign finance laws. But all that was quickly eclipsed, when the news of an illegal alien killing beautiful teenager Mollie Tibbetts of University of Iowa, broke.

And even though CNN makes Cohen’s admissions as if it were some really explosive political situation — it is not. And because Cohen is alleging that, rather than acting on his own, as he said so many times prior to this time where he was poised to profit by lying, as he now claims that he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in hush money, under the direction of Donald J Trump.

So even if that were in reality some far fetched scheme for shutting up these “hoes” with NDA and Confidentiality agreements — it would still be a legal and perfectly useful method of normal procedure for famous people who want to keep their business of where they dunk their quill, private. As for all those crying “wolf” and seeing Russian collusion in the panties of the porn stars — these were not some kind of secret campaign contributions. So for us to now believe the new story of Mr Cohen, that supposedly he acted at the explicit direction of his then-client, Republican presidential candidate Donald J. Trump — it would be a bridge too far to connect the President to his Attorneys’ ethical, moral, and criminal violations.

Seeing the repetitional gap, and the difficulty for bringing about a certain suspense of disbelief — in recent days, Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis (friend of Hillary Clinton), unearthed this gem: There’s “no doubt President Trump committed a crime” but he cannot be indicted. To this the world yawned, and all of the GOP, the Republicans, and the Independents, in Congress and Senate — simply disagreed. As for the Democrats — well, they have already branded Trump as traitor, racist, and even as the UFO alien candidate form another planet and the equivalent of “an un-indicted co-conspirator” and some of the most crazy amongst them, like Maxine Waters, and Richard Blumenthal, have even asserted that a criminal indictment of the President “should be on the table.”

To this, I say — well said: Look at the children, they can even talk under the influence … but that is the regular drug addled brain of them talking. Please lay-off the crack pipe for a second…


Indeed, my suggestion to the crazed Dems, and their Socialist ilk, is to put down the crack pipe, and wait for a few weeks of Detox before they operate any heavy machinery, like the bathroom toilet, or the shower — let alone pass judgement on an innocent man.

But for the sake of expediency we have to ask this: Do the facts of the Cohen case actually present any evidence that Trump committed a crime, as his former personal attorney is reportedly willing to testify?

To get a unbiased perspective of how a federal prosecutor would view the evidence so far — we asked a group of white collar defense attorneys who had served as Prosecutors or even as heads of the Public Corruption Section, and had successfully prosecuted politicians in the past…

And this is the attorneys’ analysis that cuts through the fog of politics to assess the available facts through the lens of a seasoned prosecutor. The conclusion is that that the evidence from Cohen plea is far from decisive, and that the facts, don’t meet standard of clear criminal misconduct that, on their own, would justify an indictment or impeachment.

With guidance from these attorneys, let’s examine four questions to clarify the legal danger Trump faces from the Cohen guilty plea.

What crime could trump be charged with?

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York, which brought the Cohen case, states that Cohen pled guilty to violating two separate campaign finance laws. Both breaches arose from hush money payments made to two women who threatened to go public just prior to the election with revelations that they’d had affairs with Trump. In each instance, the U.S. Attorney relies heavily on the Cohen’s characterization of the state-of-mind that motivated his actions. As the U.S. Attorney’s press release and indictment state, “Cohen caused and made the payments… in order to influence the 2016 presidential election.”

First, Cohen orchestrated a complex scheme in which “the company,” obviously a reference to the Trump Organization, paid $150,000 to a “woman-1,” the code name for former Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal. The U.S. Attorney states that since the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 bans corporations from making any direct contributions to presidential candidates, and that Cohen admits the money went to bolster Trump’s candidacy, the payment amounts to a criminal violation of federal campaign finance laws.

Second, Cohen made a $130,000 payment from his personal funds to a second woman (“Woman-2” in the indictment, identified from previous reports as pornography actress Stephanie Clifford, better known as Stormy Daniels, threatening to sell her story about an affair with Trump. Federal campaign laws set a $2,700 limit on an individual’s contribution to a presidential campaign; Cohen’s hush money payment therefore violated a second provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act applying to contributions for individuals. Once again, it’s allegedly a crime because Cohen admits that the $130,000 was targeted to shield Trump’s presidential bid from bad publicity, and is therefore a campaign contribution.

According to press reports detailing Cohen’s statements to prosecutors, and Davis’ assertions on TV news shows, Trump knew about the threats and demands for payments at the time they were made. Cohen further asserts that Trump instructed him follow both of the illegal routes–using corporate funds and paying with Cohen’s personal cash–and to keep the payments secret. Most potentially damaging, Cohen alleges that he and Trump shared the same motives: shielding the candidate from a flood of negative stories weeks before the election.

The case boils down to the intent of Trump, rather than Cohen, and whether federal campaign laws are as black and white as Cohen’s team is claiming.

Does Trump have a convincing defense?

The attorneys point out that for Trump to be guilty of a crime, prosecutors would need to prove that he ordered the payments chiefly to influence the election. That’s the crucial link in proving that the hush money actually amounted to campaign contributions.

“Cohen talked about his mental state, and that he was motivated by helping his campaign.” “But what was the mental state of the President? Those who suggest a direct link between Cohen’s thinking and that of the President are missing crucial steps. Just because Cohen says that Trump was buying the women’s silence for electoral purposes isn’t in itself proof.”

Indeed, note the attorneys: “Trump may have acted for reasons not motivated by the election. He could have been motivated by protecting his wife and children from embarrassment.” They say, that a conversation between Cohen and Trump that Cohen secretly taped, in which they discuss how to channel money to McDougal — though damaging in other ways — “does not provide proof of Trump’s intent.”

The attorneys draw from their own experience as prosecutors on the process of weighing evidence to determine whether or not to bring an indictment. “It’s not a slam dunk to conclude that just because he’s a presidential candidate, that he’s motivated principally by electoral purposes to suppress something as personal as an affair,” he says.

In an August 22nd interview on Fox News, Trump appeared to be charting a defense strategy. He stated that he knew nothing about both payments until after they were made. That statement may be plausible in the case of Clifford (Stormy Daniels), but contradicts the secretly-recorded tape, where he talks to Cohen about paying off the Playboy model McDougal. Trump also asserted on Fox that the hush money “came from me” and not from campaign funds. In effect, Trump is arguing that the payments weren’t campaign contributions at all. Trump didn’t say what motivated him to kill what he characterizes as “false and extortionist” allegations. But he’s clearly saying he had a motive apart from protecting his campaign.

Can Trump be indicted while in office?

As the attorneys point out, the law isn’t clear on the issue. During the 1990s Whitewater probe, independent counsel Kenneth Starr asserted that a sitting president can be indicted while in office. The most influential opinion, however, is contained in 1973 memo from the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed in 2000. That opinion holds that indicting a sitting president implies a violation of the Constitution because it could hobble his ability to govern, preventing the leader of the executive branch from “accomplishing his constitutional duties.”

In the end, Special Councel Kenneth Starr decided not to seek an indictment, instead submitting his findings to Congress, effectively deeming that the removal of a president should best proceed through the impeachment process.

Based on today’s evidence, should Trump be indicted or impeached?

Besides speaking to these attorneys, I sought the views of a former prosecutor with deep experience bringing criminal cases and who is no fan of Donald Trump. We’ll call this revered veteran Top Cop. For Top Cop, any potential case against Trump for criminal campaign law violations seems weak. “It’s really an attenuated way to get him,” he says. “These were really attempts at extortion, where the women were saying: “If you don’t pay us, we’ll go public and hurt you.” They will say things that are embarrassing to your family, so you suppress it. Is that a campaign contribution?”

The attorneys basically agree: “To charge a sitting president based on a discrete offense committed before he was president, and relying on the word of Cohen, would be a highly aggressive prosecutorial act,” he says. “For a criminal prosecution of a sitting president, the evidence must be very strong and arguably go the heart of extremely serious misconduct.”

The attorneys reckon that the recent verdicts may prolong the investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller. “The combination of the Cohen and Manafort verdicts have bought him some time against critics who believe he should be wrapping up the case,” says Collins. “From what I know about Mueller, he’s a careful, don’t-push-the-envelope prosecutor.”

Still, the attorney doesn’t think that Mueller will assert impeachable offenses based on the Cohen evidence as it now stands. “We need to see what Mueller determines from the totality of his investigation and not this referral he made to the Southern District of New York for the Cohen case,” says Collins. “Those charges though politically explosive, will not determine what Mueller will ultimately do as it relates to the President.”

So fake news is like bad jokes – but those bad jokes in some circles are truly considered as bad as fake news are today.

And indeed, many years ago I heard a good joke about JFK and his force of habit for smoking those small Cuban cigars that he had to bypass the very Embargo that he was imposing upon Cuba, so he can satisfy his craving for these stinking yet weirdly aromatic smudging cheroots…

Story goes that JFK sent his Chief of Press from Washington DC, all the way to Havana, in order to grab for him a big ass box of cigars in the last minutes, before the embargo he ordered, got started…

Now although this sounds like fake news — it is entirely true. Indeed it is true that President John F. Kennedy managed to secure for himself 1,200 Cuban cigars — as it turns out a lifelong supply – in that James Bond in-and-out-of-Cuba-in-a-hurry, fashion.

JFK’s press secretary flew to Havana, bought the cigars, and left again with mere minutes to spare, before the United States enacted the Cuban trade embargo of 1962. John Fitzgerald Kennedy indeed had requested this favor from his head of press, Pierre Salinger, by asking him “to get me 1,200 Petit Upmanns” and now as the United States rolls into its 56th year of the trade embargo with Cuba — we must remember that these are some of the finest cigars to be smoked by man and enjoyed by a woman.

And the amazing part about this is that this is not a hoax, not a joke, and certainly not fake news.

Now the old club joke goes as follows: “Where a President jams his cigar is private, and best forget about it, because its none of anyone’s business.”

Sage advise, and I would think that would go for a private citizen as well. But as the current 45th president of the White House, DJT doesn’t even smoke any cigars — one can only hope that he has some other uses for porn stars and attention whores, and all assorted hoes.

And since some of that stash of Cubans still exist in the White House smoke room today, one can only hope that the President still has some uses for them. Hopefully uses that are not restricted to the humidifier effect these uber-wet ladies circulating around Men of Power, have. Those “stormy hoes” that flutter around powerful men, like moths circling in ever closing arcs, to the candle light flaming imbroglio. And maybe DJT can derive some uses for the Cuban cigars left over from the Cold War, that will appeal to both the ladies and to the man around whom, these butterflies swirl, fly, and eventually get their wings singed, their antennae picking up all things, their mouths agape working over time, and their minds unhinged…

Enough now…

We spent too much time on the subject of Cuban cigars and their many unusual, strange, and entertaining uses — besides corroding a Man’s lungs.

And for now — so much, for the politically incorrect jokes — but I con’t resist this last one because it is a true gem from that JFK era, and especially from the time that the President was betrothed to Jacklyn Bouvier Kennedy, but was also bedding both Marilyn Monroe and a bevy of other young starlets, and this made Marilyn jealous and drove her to suicide.

Yet apparently Jackie O’ was unmoved…

Now if you can believe that … I’ve got a bridge to sell to you, if you can come meet me on the Brooklyn side of it with a truckload of Bitcoins…

But as fake news go, nothing trumps the fake news from George Washington’s era, that made an unreasonably big impact on the war of Independence of this Nation.

The fake news that haunted George Washington, was a series of letters attributed — falsely — to George Washington. These letters said that the Americans had “grasped at things beyond our reach” by revolting against Britain… at a time that the Revolutionary War was at a crucial point in 1777. That is when a remarkable set of documents surfaced in London that cast doubt on Yankee resolve to continue fighting the war…

Seems the Brits were always masters of the subterfuge and disinformation game as we see from the compositional literature and bogus stories, that the “Russian Dossier” author Christopher Steele has been engaging lately as he peddled successfully his fake news in the form of the Russian election meddling to the security agencies of these United States and to the DOJ that spent a couple of years and untold millions assigning an unchecked and out of control Special Prosecutor to disrupt the life of this nation for the sole benefit of the Chinese enemies of our State, who are the real paymasters behind the Russian hoax.

But I digress, and let’s get back to the revolutionary war times where George Washington himself had to battle the fake news and the Redcoats at the same time that he was fighting against Congress and their niggardly way of apportioning support, funds, materiel & men, for the war effort…

With France not yet helping the struggling American colonist rebels, a packet of letters said to have been intercepted from General George Washington’s postal service, showed up in London. And the reading of those letters exposed that the American leader was far from committed to the cause of American independence. In eloquent, plaintive language, he told his closest family that he was miserable, and that the war was a mistake.

“But we have overshot our mark,” read a letter to Lund Washington, a cousin who managed Mount Vernon, “we have grasped at things beyond our reach: it is impossible we should succeed; and, I cannot with truth, say that I am sorry for it; because I am far from being sure that we deserve to succeed.”

Oh, George, say it ain’t so!

Screen Shot 2018-07-31 at 8.36.31 AM

It wasn’t. The letters were forgeries. It took a long time for that to be widely known, though, and the letters dogged Washington for the rest of his life. They resurfaced two decades later, during his presidency, when critics were slamming him for being too accommodating to the former British overlords.

Turns out that fake news — that most disorienting symptom of modern political dysfunction — isn’t so modern after all. People were making stuff up and foisting it on the public back when it was spelled publick. Ye olde fake news, you might say.

One of the “spurious letters” attributed to George Washington but known to be forgeries. From a pamphlet published around 1796.
The seven missives — known to scholars as the “spurious letters” — are a particularly sophisticated example of the craft. Written with a close ear for Washington’s style, full of intimate personal details, they go just a few shrewd steps beyond statements the great man actually made when bemoaning his plight. Their origin remains a mystery, though Washington spent years trying to track down the author.

Somebody put serious effort into the way they were presented, complete with a preface from an unnamed “editor” who used the salesman’s trick of seeming to side with a doubtful audience.

“The public will naturally be inquisitive as to the authenticity of the following letters,” the trickster wrote in a pamphlet that was widely distributed on both sides of the Atlantic. “For everything else they will speak for themselves: and, for their genuineness, the editor conceives himself concerned to give only such vouchers as he himself has received.”

From there the editor laid out the tale: A Loyalist friend serving under British Brig. Gen. Oliver De Lancey of New York had come across a familiar-looking prisoner after the Yankees fled Fort Lee, N.J. — a “mulatto fellow” named Billy whom he recognized as a slave owned by Washington. Apparently, Billy had gotten separated from the general in the confusion of the retreat and was left holding a small trunk belonging to Washington.

In the trunk, the British soldier found some stockings and shirts — and a packet of letters. “I read these with avidity,” the editor quoted the soldier as saying, “and being highly entertained with them, have shewn them to several of my friends, who all agree with me, that he is a very different character from what they had supposed him. I never knew a man so much to be pitied.”

By now the Colonial-era reader could not help but be intrigued. The basic elements are true — Washington fled Fort Lee in haste, and he had a personal slave named William. And the letters were being presented with due skepticism and with sympathy for their supposed author.

After all, poor George comes across as noble — he tells his stepson that he is married to both his sword and to Martha, and “death alone shall divorce me from either” — but also henpecked. He opens a letter to Martha by declaring how wounded he is that she suspects him of being less concerned about her.

“The suspicion is most unjust,” he writes, “may I not add, it is most unkind?” Yes, he confesses, he hasn’t written as often lately. But, um, he’s a little distracted with this whole war thing: “But think of my situation, and then ask your heart, if I be without excuse.”

Then, with all the smoothness of somebody who fathered a whole country, he proclaims that his heart “must cease to beat, ere it can cease to wish for your happiness, above any thing on earth.” Plus, he urges her to get inoculated against smallpox.

All pretty charming so far, right?

Yet it’s all fake news, written and designed in order that you are placed off guard, and off balance, when you get to the part where George Washington pines for reconciliation with Britain, and supposedly avows that “I love my King.”

Indeed, the letters are so well crafted that Washington himself was impressed. “These letters are written with a great deal of art,” he actually wrote to his friend Richard Henry Lee. But Washington lamented the “villainy” that produced them and urged his friends to track down the author.

He came to believe that they had been written by John Randolph of Virginia, a Loyalist who fled to England during the war and died there. Looking back at the evidence in the late 1800s, Library of Congress scholar Worthington Chauncey Ford felt the case for Randolph being the author was compelling.

Ford also pointed out that there were several errors in the letters that undermine their authenticity, starting with the fact that Washington’s slave William Lee was never captured by the British.

For his part, Washington appealed to friends and acquaintances over the years to consider that the letters did not reflect his character. But with a restraint that seems very foreign today, he appears not to have responded in any newspapers or gazettes, and to have let his reputation stand on its own.

Until almost at the very end.

Yet in the final days of his presidency, he put a statement into the public record disavowing each of the seven letters: “I have thought it a duty that I owe to myself, my country, and to truth . . . to add my solemn declaration, that the letters herein described are a base forgery, and that I never saw or heard of them until they appeared in print.”

Secretary of State Timothy Pickering sent that letter out to all the newspapers and gazettes that had printed the fakes, and publishers updated the official collection of Washington’s papers.

And it’s heartening to realize that Washington’s faith in posterity was well placed — more people today believe that he chopped down a cherry tree than that he doubted the rightness of the Revolution.

Of course, the cherry tree was fake news, too…

And so is the story of President Trump’s impeachment, too…

All Fake News, all the time.

Just like CNN.


Dr Churchill


“Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing.”
–Theodore Roosevelt

Posted by: Dr Churchill | August 23, 2018

SpyGate – Chapter Fifty – “What Next?”


This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Fifty
“Fair-Play & The Game of GOTCHA”

The evil game of a McCarthy era Red Scare, manifesting as a game of “GOTCHA” is what we see now playing daily in our screens and parading on the national mindscape, where the highest ever paid Federal Prosecutor is using his expert “fishing style” to tackle the whale.

Like a new and equally twisted captain Ahab, straight out of Melville’s book, “Moby Dick” — dirty cop Robert Mueller’s investigational fishing expedition is presented to us as the Mueller Russia Hoax, that continues for two years in what has proved to be a national shame.

It is the stuff of legends because after wasting two productive years of the national energy, this hoax has now become a national debasement, a rape of our Constitutional values, and the most awful manifestation of the debauchery of our national sense of the All American principle of Fair Play.

This dirty cop Robert Mueller’s mission statement and also his stated purpose and his modus operandi is none other than “WE HAVE TO CATCH THAT FISH AND KILL IT. And his instructions to his minions are to go ahead and throw dynamite in the water, to blow everything up and kill everything that lives under the surface — regardless of consequences — so long as he gets to see the POTUS coming belly up on the surface of the sea.

Yet what the prosecutors, the detractors of the 45th President, and all those snowflakes suffering from a Daddy issue complex have forgotten, is that the 45th POTUS is protected by God himself and the Good Lord Jesus Christ will not allow the diseconomy to succeed or even to continue against him.

Screen Shot 2018-08-22 at 6.58.45 AM

This whole thing will blow away now that we’ve sen the Russian Collusion theory turning into a broken taillight or a tax matter that the vengeful cop dirty and American uranium seller Rto the Russian, Robert Mueller has allowed it to become.

This is obvious from the General Flynn, the Cohen, and the Manafort cases, where the Special Councel powers are used to make people compose literary things that can be then traced back to POTUS and used by Mueller’s rabid dogs, in order to accuse him of something, like a broken taillight, or indict him of some nefarious wrongdoing, or even ask for his impeachment…

And these poor folks like General Flynn, Attorney Cohen, and Campaign Manager Paul Manafort, that have gotten caught in the clutches of the Mueller Gestapo, and are pressed into the vice of the Rosenstein SS squad, and that of the DOJ goons who are willing to do anything it takes, in order to escape the torture and the solitary confinement, hoping to get some measure of leniency, and thus they are signaling that they are willing to make a deal (any deal with the Devil), in order to save themselves from a life time in the slammer — simply for daring to help elect a President other than the Hillary Clinton alcoholic hag and her army of evil snowflake minions.

What a Crime … eh?

To think differently…

To be at Liberty to vote your Christian Conscience…

All he above represent terrible crimes in the eyes of the unredeemable snowflakes and the phat buttercups, who are seeking to make our Revolutionary Republic and this Experiment in Government “By the People, Of the People, and From the People” — a redundancy.

They want to vacate our Democratic Republic and our Constitution, and instead want to provide for us, a single party rule, as they’ve seen it work so well for the people, in the whole of the Soviet Union, in North Korea, in Zimbabwe, in Cuba, in Venezuela, and in China. As a matter of fact, these are all places where ideology at the point of the gun is enforced, and tens of millions of people are murdered, disappeared, or becoming Non-Persons, for simply having a different idea in their head.

Choosing to have a different idea, a pluralistic mind, an open heart, a Christian conscience, and going even further on, to choose to campaign for an ideologically different platform — this is being outlawed today in this country of ours. And it is happening, rather fast….

We’ve got to stop that tide of National Socialist thought, and instead we ought to embrace the Constitutional principles tighter — if we are hoping to having and maintaining a strong Republic. Not a “one party” or even a “two party” system, but rather a multiparty Democratic Republic system, as envisioned by the Founders and the Framers of the Constitution — where fresh ideas are tried out in the cauldron of argumentative & parliamentary style open debate, and then under immense heat, the gold gets separated from the base metals, so we can find the “Golden Medium” and the “Best American Solution” that serves us best.

Because now — methinks it’s time — we all need to join hands in order to control and stop this evil two tier Justice system, and the un-American way of mistreating the Christian Conservative people, before we rip this country of ours apart. We need to stop this crap, before we separate our beautiful country in two. Two opposing and warring halves…

And that is the palpable danger and perhaps the very foundational design of this Russia-Russia hoax, and the out-of-Control investigation, this fishing expedition, that has become the equivalent of a modern era witch hunt, against our President. It is the Chinese who will benefit from this and nobody else.

This partisan travesty of Justice, must STOP right now.

Further as I pointed out, and as Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) also believes — there is evidence to suggest that some of the Russia/Clinton investigation FBI interview reports (known as 302s) were “changed to either prosecute or not prosecute” certain individuals. This raises many concerns and a multitude of questions about Mueller”s witch hunt… Yet chief among them, is what does this mean for former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn?

Because former FBI Director James Comey also provided conflicting testimony and statements regarding whether or not the FBI agents who conducted the Flynn interview believed he was lying during the questioning.

So, what is an FBI 302 report in the the case of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn?

This is what the process of entrapping General Michael Flynn by putting together a 302 witness report happened. Keep in mind that as proven by the Peter Strzok SMS texts with Lisa Page — Strzok who was the Chief Interviewer of Flynn, wanted to “Fvck Flynn” and then ‘Fvck the President Trump.” So obviously these FBI guys wanted to get General Flynn, and all he had to do was mis-remember just one time amongst the many many times that he had talked in passing with the Russian ambassador Kisliek in the many DC diplomatic circuits of diplomatic niceties, cultural events, and large dinner parties and balls and all other social events that hasten the nights of the Capital of the Free World. And that’s all it took to bring down General Flynn. His misremembering a wine & cheese reception during which he said a passing Hello to the Russian Ambassador. That’s all they got him on. Then they automatically brought him up on that one charge… because instead of remembering the 27 times of his random meetings — he recalled only the 26 of them during his testimony.

Typically, FBI procedures say that two agents are supposed to be present in order to do the interview. The rationale behind it is so that you get two people, so there’s redundancy. For example, if one agent is unable to testify, there’s another person there who witnessed it. An interview of a subject usually comes at the very end of an investigation. Next, they perform interviews of victims, and of crimes, and not just the subject. So in the form of a bank robbery, you might have multiple 302s from the people who were there, the teller, somebody who saw the getaway car, or associates of the subject.

When you first go into an interview, the process is that you identify yourself. I’m “so and so,” a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. You state the day, time, and you state the location of where the interview occurs. Once you’ve got that out of the way, then you delve into the actual process of the interview. Now an interview can be wide-ranging and it can go all over the place. You can typically go to an interview with an outline of what you want to talk about. You go in there full of knowledge of the investigation and of what has transpired so far. And you typically try and get the person to talk about those things without revealing all of that information that you have, without showing your cards, without tipping your hand.

As you’re performing that interview you get the person to talk about what you want them to talk about. Remember, the interview is strictly based on factual observations and statements that are made. There is no room for conjecture. There’s no room for opining and there is really no room for hypotheses to be put in [the 302 form]. It’s strictly observation. You can make personal observations about the person’s demeanor… If I suspected that somebody was drunk or under the influence of a substance during the interview, I could say something to the effect, “upon walking into the room to interview X, the interviewing agent noted that he smelled heavily of alcohol. X was slurring their words and having trouble making coherent sentences.” I could not say that I believe X was completely drunk because I did not know that for a fact and that’s not something that I was able to verify while there.

Typically one agent will be doing interviewing, another agent will be taking notes. Sometimes both agents will take notes. You usually only want to have one agent take notes because if it goes to court, both sets of notes could present a problem if they are not in agreement.

Regarding Flynn’s particular interview, both agents would physically sign that initial copy. In the case of Flynn you know both FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, and FBI Special Agent Joe Pientka, both would digitally sign the 302. You know there’s a system and the FBI agents put in a card that identifies them. There’s a specific pin that is known only to you. You look at the documents. You say that everything looks good, then you click sign and…enter your pin. It’s digitally signed for you. Only they could do that. If somebody had their log-in information, which is highly unlikely, then, of course, they could do that. That’s really what a 302 is. It is a capture of facts and it is a capture of observations. It’s not a total report of an investigation. It’s not a summation of everything that’s happening. It’s just what transpired during that snapshot in time, for when they interview the person.

But, now with all the new evidence on Former Deputy Director, Andrew McCabe and Former Special Agent Peter Strzok, one has to wonder; how does that affect the Flynn case?

Would these agents have shared their findings with superiors?

As you know, there are all sorts of lies that have been discovered on what has transpired with regard to McCabe, Comey possibly as well here, as well as other people that were involved in that sort of special investigation. McCabe was caught lying, Comey was caught lying, and other FBI top level officers were caught lying too. For example, with Flynn’s 302s and notes, the agents would take those documents back to headquarters and then share what they observed with people. McCabe and Comey may be two of those people. The agents are going to talk about it and people are going to ask how the interview went. They are going to read that document and then ask for the opinions of the investigators, in this case, Strzok and Pientka. And that is where this idea that you know one agent or possibly both agents said, “look we don’t think that he was lying or maybe he wasn’t forthcoming.”

I heard that McCabe was upset after hearing from the agents that they didn’t think he was lying. I mean given what we’ve learned of McCabe so far and given what we know about McCabe’s previous actions of purposely trying to undermine the Trump administration, that’s what happened. Was there a difference between the way the FBI handled Flynn’s case and the way the bureau handled McCabe’s case?

Of course, since Flynn was only interviewed once and was never under oath. McCabe was interviewed twice and was under oath during both instances. Further, Flynn was never told that he was being formally interviewed. McCabe was advised of the nature of his interviews on both occasions. Third, Flynn was never told what they suspected him of lying about and given the chance to explain. McCabe was asked, through the OPR process, on two occasions and through a formal document, whether he needed to clarify anything or change any information. He did not, which makes his lying intentional and with his full knowledge of his actions. And finally, Flynn has been charged with 18 USC 1001, making false official statements. McCabe has not.

Is it a conflict of interest now that the congressional committees and the IG have found that Strzok had such anti-Trump bias based on the fact that he was conducting the interview with Flynn and was so integrally involved in both investigations?

It would, absolutely impact anything done here. Any judge would pick that apart in a court of law, any judge. He is tainted at that point. And you do have issues of taint in a court law… One of the things that you have issues with is [that] you have all this highly sensitive…top secret, tight reporting that occurs and you don’t want to have people who have been tainted by that material performing that interview. Now, you do it for a lot of reasons. One, you do it because sometimes you can’t give up that information. You want to get what’s called a clean team to do the interviews…people who haven’t had access to any of this highly sensitive information to perform the interview and you give them sort rough guidelines [of] what you want them to talk about and then hopefully they’ll get the person to admit to it.

Let’s Explain that…

That is, you won’t have to divulge where they received this extremely sensitive information. When you get very sensitive information from other governments…things that are within the arsenal of the U.S. government that you don’t want coming out … in the court of law.

What about now?

Now we know that even before the interview with Flynn, Strzok was so vehemently anti-Trump that he had every reason to want to pursue charges against him. Could Strzok have suggested later down the line that Flynn was lying? I mean, I would think that this information would taint the interview they had with Flynn.

I have the legal mind and the understanding that there’s actually a legal precedent against that, and I would say that any good lawyer should absolutely have a field day with him, being able to say that it was a biased interview because of the bias that Strzok had felt towards the Trump administration. I would be interested to see what McCabe’s text messages are, that sent him to the next point. But, you know it also looks like they were kind of smart enough to do a lot of in-person meetings in Andy’s office and not put anything into texts. I think McCabe has been pretty shrewd in handling all communications and letting, you know, Former FBI Attorney Lisa Page to be a conduit for it. Regardless of that, Flynn’s lawyer should absolutely have a field day with saying that…Flynn was a representative of the Trump administration and Strzok and McCabe had set their sights squarely on him as a member of the administration. They interviewed him and then they put this case together against him and presented those facts to the Special Counsel.

So, if they didn’t think he lied, how did they get him to admit guilt and accuse him of lying in the end?

It’s a dangerous charge and easy to use… one that is a difficult rap to escape.

And it could start from anything during the questioning that doesn’t exactly line up. They would question Flynn on the number of times he had contact with a Russian representative. They could have said, “Mr. Flynn how many times have you spoken with the Russian officials?” In good conscience, he may have said, “to the best of my recollection it was four to five times that I spoke with him.” Or, ” You know X amount of time.” That answer got that captured in the 302 document. The agents can go back and say, “we have technical collection says that he spoke with the Russians six or seven times.” And so, what you have is, you have Flynn saying “I suppose x amount of times” and then the government knowing he spoke this amount time. From a small inaccurate recollection, you have your a 18 USC 1001 charge, providing false information to federal agents. Now, it’s pretty damn flimsy. And I think if it were taken to court… it would have a hard time making it stand upright.

What we know about the Flynn interview, is that Flynn was very forthcoming about the things that they really didn’t even ask him about or about things that there’s no way he could have suspected that they knew information about. For example, other meetings that he had, or about people with whom he met and was very forthcoming about that. Even though he was very forthcoming about 99 percent of things that happened, if he mis-remembered, or if he was exhausted because the guy probably had about four hours of sleep a night during that time, it didn’t matter, in the end. They wanted to get him. All he had to do was misremember one time that he talked to the guy. Then they could automatically bring him up on that one charge.

This seems like an easy way to entrap someone or get them on a charge that really is weak…

Like I said, it’s a long tried and true technique that the FBI uses in investigations where they don’t have the very concrete charges to stick to somebody and they want to nail them. He got the charge that is usually filed against friends and families of suspects when you’re trying to break the suspect. And I gotta be honest with you, there have probably been times where the FBI has really overreached and might have overstepped the boundaries in using that 1001 charge. It’s a dangerous charge and easy to use.

So, if Flynn didn’t lie, why did he plead guilty to the charge?

From what I understand is that the McCabe/Strzok team basically tarnished his name overnight and then they held out until he’s really at his wit’s end. Flynn’s financially was in a hole. He’s already sold his house. He’s completely destitute. The bureau starts going after his family and they say, “Hey Mike Flynn, we’re going to go after your family.” Maybe there’s something they think they can get on his son or anyone close to him. Flynn is a true patriot and a stand-up guy. So he takes the 1001 charge to get the Special Counsel off his back. The FBI and Special Counsel clap their hands and pat themselves on the back and then there it is. That’s how it all happens.

I would think there is some legal precedent for something like this; some kind of grounds just based on the fact that Strzok and McCabe appear to be so biased against Trump…

Here’s the legal definition of Giglio information or material: it refers to material tending to impeach the character or testimony of the prosecution witness in a criminal trial. I’d say there’s something here based on all the evidence that’s already come forward.

On the other hand Mr Cohen accepted a rap and a bum deal and he will come up for sentencing in December of 2018 after his plea deal and Mr. Manafort, in also facing another trial next month, on seven charges, including obstruction of justice, failure to register as a foreign agent, and conspiracy to launder money — all in the District of Columbia.

So let’s examine now how did we end-up where we are today:

Three of President Trump’s former advisers have received certain legal setbacks in their persecution by the errant forces of the evil & dirty cop Robert Mueller, and yet the White House remained cheerful with the pervasive belief, rightly, that things are looking up.

The are looking up because after two years NOT A SINGLE INSTANCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION has been found — there fore it is obvious eta the spurious charges against the President are just that. It has now been proven that this whole Russia Witch-Hunt was a successful side show used to cover up the Democrats’ own and verified Russian Collusion, exhibited broadly by the sale of American Uranium to the Kremlin.

Of course this, was little consolation to General Flynn, Paul Manafort, or even Stephen Cohen, because as advisers who either took a “plea deal” or not — they have been entered into the ‘system” that is designed to break the men. And this strategy of dirty cop Robert Mueller for leaking the news that Mr Trump’s former fixer, Michael D. Cohen, had admitted in federal court that Mr. Trump directed him to arrange payments to two women during the 2016 campaign in order to silence them from talking publicly about affairs they said they had with Mr Trump — is also now been spun as news, whereas Stephen Cohen many times said that the initiative to pay the porn stars was his alone. That clears Trump fully from the hookers’ wrap, or mouth as the case might be with each particular one — since Omarosa is also known for being a felatio afficionado, and she has taken her big mouth on the news windows to play the talking head for a change instead of the giving head, following the road that Stormy Daniels opened up for the alliance of unrepentant hoes.

It has also further been revealed that the President offered up for questioning the White House Councel whose 30 hours of questioning by the angry Democrats of dirty cop Robert Mueller, ended in a PHAT NOTHING, and continued with President Trump offering more than a million records, and also making available dozens of current and former White House aides, to put a spin on the conviction of Paul Manafort, by Mr Trump. All that without once invoking Executive Privilege.

This guy Trump has got to be the most transparent President in history. End of story.

However as President Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was just now found guilty on eight counts of decades old financial affairs, that are completely unrelated to the Presidential Election Campaign of 2016, or anything to do with President Trump, or with Russia, or with anything remotely related to Politics — we need to celebrate instead of crying in our cups for poor Paul Manafort.

We need to celebrate because this is further proof that the dirty cop Robert Mueller is on a fishing expedition like Captain Ahab of Melville’s Moby Dick fame. And the fact that all of the Manafort financial matters, are far more than a dozen years removed from his association with President Trump — further proves the vengeance and the desperation of the dirty cop and deranged “Captain Ahab” Robert Mueller, who is monomaniacal in his wish to “catch” the President in this dirty game of GOTCHA as all his leftists and angry Democrat prosecutors are. And they are desperate because they all associated with Hillary Clinton and are now Losers with a capital “L” tattooed permanently on their foreheads.

As for these decade old financial matters of Manafort — it is important to note, that they have never impacted our Republic, and are all going to be appealed, and the sentencing of course of these matters is going to be delayed for a while now. But the damage done to our Republic today by the toxic, old, smelly & dirty cop, turned “Captain Ahab” Robert Mueller, is palpable everywhere. And it is most strongly felt in the diminishing wish and capacity of our young people to get involved in our Democracy, for fear that if they enter politics in our campaign and in our electoral system of Democracy today, as Conservative Christians — they will be targeted and destroyed. And this comes at a time when the young people are concerned that they have to fight for what is right; if they want to have any kind of future in our Republic.

Still Paul Manafort and General Flynn are both upbeat, and of course that is the only option for all winning Trump people: Follow Mr Trump’s lead in seeking Victory for all the American people, at all costs. The President in a very Churchillian manner, took a rather PRESIDENTIAL TOUR OF THE COUNTRY, and is returning to his office this week as he decided to grab the bull by the horns, and seize the opportunity to speak through a pre-planned sit-down interview with the News on Wednesday.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, offered these comments on the Manafort matter: “This is proof that the President did nothing wrong” … “There are absolutely no charges against him, and no intimation of anything done wrong by him.”

Make a note of that.

After two years of dogged pursuit, all that Captain Ahab has caught is a couple of little sardines that have been canned for a dozen years or more.

Well done Bobbie.

Best get back to fishing in your retirement.

Or go back to Stormy Daniels and her porn-hoe lawyer, because only the “treasure chest” might save you… from the red & stormy sea thats coming to get you.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, again and repeatedly told reporters that Mr. Trump had done “nothing wrong.”

“We started with Russia collusion,” the president mused, according to several people who witnessed Mr Trump’s somber mood. “How did we end up here?”

On Wednesday, several aides dismissed the news about Mr Cohen as just another fake news bad headline…

Mr Trump spent the early hours of Wednesday tweeting — he called Mr Manafort a “brave man” who, unlike Mr Cohen, “refused to ‘break’” or “make up stories in order to get a ‘deal.’’’ He also monitored headlines, as he did after his news conference with Mr Putin. In his interview with Fox News, he asserted that money for the payments to the women had come not from his campaign, but from his own accounts.

“I don’t know if you know” Mr Trump said during the interview, “I tweeted about the payments. They didn’t come out of the campaign.” Campaign finance laws still prohibit Mr Trump from making unreported payments related to the campaign, regardless of where they came from. Neither payment was disclosed to the Federal Election Commission.

On Air Force One on Tuesday night on the way back from a rally in West Virginia, Mr. Trump repeatedly minimized the news, telling aides that the legal developments were not about him, but about Mr Manafort and Mr Cohen. He also groused over the optics of the rally, telling a person close to him that the crowd seemed flat and that some chairs were empty.

By Wednesday, Mr Trump’s lawyers were arguing privately that Mr Cohen’s admission, and guilty plea, taking the Mueller deal to accept that he violated campaign finance laws was a “punch” and were assessing what options they had for fighting back. They stressed that Mr. Cohen had said repeatedly in public and under oath, on many previous accounts that Mr Trump was not aware of his payment to Ms Clifford, known as “Treasure Chest” Stormy Daniels, at the time that he made the payments.

Inside the White House, in an interview, Mr Giuliani said that he had spoken at length with Mr Trump, but that the president had wanted to move on from legal tangles to other topics — including the golf game that Mr Rudy Giuliani was playing at a course in Scotland on Wednesday.

Mr Giuliani said the two had discussed the political fallout should Mr Trump grant a pardon to Mr Manafort.

“Yesterday’s plea and Manafort’s conviction, none of it had to do with collusion, none of it has to do with obstruction,” Mr Giuliani said, echoing much of what the president has said in public and in private. “He really thinks Manafort has been horribly treated.”

He added that Mr Trump’s team was looking at the possibility of making public at least one recording of Mr Cohen speaking to journalists about his payments to Ms Clifford DBA Stormy Daniels, in which he said he made the payments on his own initiative to spare the Trump family pain.

People who have known Donald J Trump for years point out, that he is at his most combative when he feels backed against the wall. They pointed to his reaction after the “Access Hollywood” tape of him boasting of grabbing women’s genitals was released in October 2016. Mr Trump responded by parading Bill Clinton’s female accusers in front of Hillary Clinton at the presidential debate in St Louis, and acted like a man with nothing to lose.

This dynamic has led President Trump to publicly praise — and privately muse about pardoning — Mr Manafort.

As indeed President Trump has exercised his pardon power several times since he took office, for the wronged black boxer, for the black Grandma who took a hit for her grandkids drug bust, for many others, who were targeted by the leftist prosecutors seeking to curry favor with their snowflakes and the politically correct brigades, and the President sought to alleviate their burden, such as when he signed a Presidential Pardon for Sheriff Joe Arpaio, for Dinesh D’Souza, the conservative writer who was prosecuted unreasonably for a minimal campaign finance violation and . One official said that there was a list of people Mr. Trump has said he would like to consider for pardons or commutations, but that Mr Manafort’s name had never been on the list.

New York 911 Mayor and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, said in the interview that a pardon for Mr Manafort was not under consideration at this time.

Ms Sanders said that, to her knowledge, the President had not discussed the idea of pardoning Mr Manafort. Several of President Trump’s advisers said that he was uncertain about the political fallout and was not quite ready to do so.

Yet, now is the moment, that President Trump should unilaterally appoint a special counsel to oversee and investigate the Department of Justice, FBI and Mueller investigation, and should bypass the Department of Justice on the grounds that it is inherently and incurably conflicted. Jeff Sessions recused himself for all matters stemming from the Mueller investigation, even those matters that have nothing do with Trump-Russia collusion because Rod Rosenstein drafted the mandate so broad that general Attorney General powers were delegated to him, which some would argue cover any matters that are discovered, meaning Sessions’ recusal would extend to any such matters.

Rod Rosenstein is also inherently conflicted and wrongfully not recusing himself. He was both a material witness in the firing of James Comey; he helped draft the firing memo, and he signed off on the fourth Fisc warrant, which we now know was predicated on an unverified dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, who had thenceforth been fired by the FBI, leaving Rosenstein completely conflicted, insofar as matters around potential obstruction of justice brought by Mueller against the President, and insofar as the investigation of the abuse of power, fraud and impropriety of the DOJ in procuring Fisc warrants to spy on Trump advisors. Presumably, the inferior officers would feel jeopardized if they besmirched their superior officers – Rod Rosenstein and Jeff Session, and therefore would be conflicted. No matter how far down the chain you go, the conflicts of interests in investigating the wrongdoing of the Department of Justice, and of Robert Mueller, including using the delegation in false pretenses as a tool to “find a crime”, instead of investigating an “actual crime”, and the use of such special counsel as a pretext for the ulterior motive of impeaching the President, a misuse of the office for political purposes, make it such that these potential wrongdoings cannot be adequately investigated by the Department of Justice, and the Department of Justice cannot be depended on to appoint a special counsel for the same reason they can’t investigate themselves – the entire Department of Justice is inherently conflicted. Therefore, the President should appoint a special counsel to oversee and investigate the Mueller Investigation for possible fraud, abuse of power and misuse of the special counsel to further a political agenda, and investigate the Department of Justice, FBI, CIA and NSA officials for which there is substantial evidence of abuse of power to further political agenda, and potential collusion with Russia, and the Democrats, in order to meddle and rig the election in Hillary Clinton’s favor.

We all are aware that the institution of the special counsel goes back to the Grant administration, and even presidents Coolidge, and Reagan, used special counsels. However, the point is that they are not not being used sparingly, as they were before the Nixon era. Like the process of the filibuster, and so many other things, the special councel appointment has grown government legs. No matter which side uses the special counsel today, it appears partisan and punitive, instead of being rooted in maintaining order, delivering justice and bringing a measure of liberty. We cannot keep creating new government entities because the current older entities are bureaucratic nightmares and dysfunctional.

“We the People” have to keep our elected officials feet to the fire. Our nation is found mired in this mess, because we were complacent with misplaced trust. We trusted that after we elected these folks, they would do what they promised us on the campaign trail. It is drudgery, it is tedious, it involves hard work and harder decisions. If it was easy every country would be us. We can do this because we are Americans…

We the people, need to keep exerting force on the bureaucrats and especially on the politicians we elect. Change is slow but look how far we have come in 40 years. The media tells us we are losing but we are not. They are in a panic. The measuring stick is the number of local, county, parrish, state, and Federal political positions which have flipped to the Christian Conservative side since Reagan. This is a long game, the leftists have been playing this game for over a century and are masters at this game. Look at what they, the rabid left, have done to the Democratic party. The Democrats had real statesmen at one time. Slightly different philosophy but statesmen nonetheless. I can only imagine were we would be if JFK had completed his term. This fight will ebb and flow, but the momentum is on our side if we keep the faith.

The constitution will win if we keep faith.

Now, let’s get these midterms won with a red sea and let’s put the politicians on notice, that we will not stand for platitudes any longer: We want constitutionally based actions and we want them now. And we want an end to the SC position of Robert Mueller and his angry Democrats, because this one is fraught with partisan political implications. We don’t need, nor should we want, more politics being played. We want the rule of law. We want both sides of the aisle cleaned up for only that way, we can get back to our constitutional form of government.

We want transparency, because corrupt Republicans are just as dangerous as corrupt Democrats. Our enemy is the corruption. That is what is destroying the nation from the inside out. Corrupt politicians from both parties are the ones who sold out our financial system and control of our currency to the control of foreign entities rather than admit their failures and deal with we the people in a straightforward and honest manner.

We have to put an end to all of this corruption or we put an end to none of it, for it will just grow another head like a hydra and continue under another guise. Our last chance for the restoration of our liberty and Constitution will be gone forever, if we don’t deal with the issue of corruption, because then we will become a nation of serfs living under the domination of national socialists, marxists, and so-called neo-con financial elites of the world.

Indeed, Mueller was actually drafting a report proposing impeachment of Trump. It’s so weak that he is trying to get Trump into the perjury trap to actually cite a crime. He is going to argue that the President tried to obstruct justice by firing Comey, and that while he had the constitutional authority to do so, he had bad intentions, to stop the investigation of his own potential bad conduct, which is what dictators do. This is what Mueller will argue. He will try to say that he tried to get Flynn free from perjury charges, with his comment “go light on him” which Comey felt sent the message “don’t prosecute him at all” and he will try to argue that he knew about the Trump tower meeting and that he knew of the Hillary emails before they were released leading only to one conclusion. That he had to have somehow been in cahoots with the Russians or at least was an abetter after the fact of the DNC hacking and of the distribution of the hacked emails. While all of these things are NOT supported by evidence, not even circumstantial evidence, Mueller will argue that the totality of the circumstances lead only to these conclusions, that the President is dishonest, had bad authoritartian intentions and colluded with the enemy, Russia, even if it was unwitthingly, like calling for them to release Hillary’s 30,000 emails at a campaign rally.
While I don’t believe that one reasonably lawyer or American should fall for this false pretenses manufactured political report to impeach that Mueller will present, it will do grave political damage to the President, and give a Democrat congress a slam-dunk for impeachment – -which is their grand plan. Once the Democrats take congress they will undoubtedly move to impeach President Trump, and Mueller’s handy dandy report will be their basis to do so. This is their grand plan.

How to stop it?

First, is that Trump and the GOP allied camp have to maintain power in Congress and the Senate, and yet so many Trump supporters I know have gone back into their cocoon of life – working hard, playing golf, driving children around, taking long deserved holidays, working on their hobbies etc, which is a basic state of pure complacency…

So word has to go out that we will lose all the progress that has been made and transend into an open border socialist society very quickly if Democrats take over congress. That they are not the JFK Democrats – these are radical Leftists who want to throw the US Constitution into a garbage can and set fire to it.

Second, the President needs to do something bold to preempt Mueller’s report – Councel to investigate the dirty cop Robert Mueller and his merry band of angry nasty Democrats. Because only if the Captain Ahab dirty cop Robert Mueller is being investigated — then he will be forced to act apolitically and actually make conclusions supported by actual evidence. He will also be subject to the Brady act, which takes away prosecutorial immunity when they have failed to show exonerative evidence. For General Flynn, the fact that they accepted a guilty plea when Comey stated that the FBI didn’t think Flynn was lying – could put Mueller in legal jeopardy. But he will only be in legal jeapardy if he is accountable to someone – and Rod Rosenstein is also a confederate force so – he is aiding and abetting Mueller’s and his plight – to rid Donald Trump of the Presidency – and thereafter to cause permanent harm to our Constitutional Republic.

And by the way, this will also be the death knell for all the Christian and Conservative leaders in this country.

So only if President Trump chooses to channel his inner Andrew Jackson, with a good dose of Jeffersonian statesmanship thrown in, along with a Churchillian measure of Victory at any cost – we will win. At the very least none can complain because indeed we are living in interesting times…

Still, case law suggests that a President would have the power to appoint a special counsel to investigate the DOJ, that statutory authority would not be necessary, because he is not completely re-organizing the executive branch just making sure it is carrying out the laws properly.

But the question remains; why would he do that, when there is already a team doing this? Horowitz and Huber together have more power and prosecutorial discretion than a SC would have, and they are already set up and working which is something no SC would be ready to do for months. As a matter of fact, quite a few legal scholars have said that Sessions appointment of Huber was pure genius and the best decision he could have made…

Yet questions about Sessions being a pvssy remain, and are augmented by his inability to take control of the DOJ and the FBI in a way that the Deep State will notice and start falling back…

Still, did you ever stop to think that maybe Sessions is staying out of the way in order to eliminate the charge of political prosecutions? It is reasonable thinking that if he were to un-recuse himself, the political backlash would be terrific, and it might cause more issues, than if he stays in the background, letting Horowitz and Huber work out of sight and allow them to bring the necessary charges and built the prosecutions that are necessary to come if we are ever able to clean and drain the God awful DC swamp.

Still, it seems to me that Sessions has covered his bases, and there is ton of work being done behind the scenes. Just the number of indictments in the last 18 months ought to tell you that, but still Sessions by nature is a pvssy.

And of course, Huber is a conservative judge from Utah that was appointed by Obama who didn’t have the stones to fight with the two Republican senators from Utah and gave Huber a “pass.” So it follows that Alfred Sessions appointment of Huber as the IG is an act of genius, because the Democrats can’t cry “Partisan Politics” since Huber was appointed by Obama. Indeed it appears to be a neat trap for birds, but not for bear, or crocodiles…

Still we must examine the President’s Reorganization Authority, to fulfill his powers to appoint a Second Council in order to give “Captain Ahab” his just deserts, and to offer the dirty cop Mueller his due, because an Investigator to investigate the Investigators his always a Good thing in times that the “Terror” has descended upon us as this time seems to be, like the blood bath of the French Thermidor with Robespierre’s Guillotine working overtime…
The President may be able to accomplish some reorganization goals through particular statutory delegations of authority, executive orders, department memos, management policies, and other devices, but to accomplish major reorganization objectives, he will need explicit statutory authority from Congress, a viable procedure to enact reorganization plans, and a feasible implementation strategy. As for the details of any reorganization plan, exact limits on the President’s authority to reorganize the executive branch “can properly be analyzed only in light of the particular changes which are proposed” and the relevant constitutional provisions and statutory authority.
KEY TAKEAWAYSThe President has no statutory authority to reorganize the executive branch, except where acts of Congress delegate authority to make particular changes. Even without statutory authority, the President may convene a task force or commission to study executive branch concerns and recommend changes to Congress. The President may create, reorganize, or abolish an office that he established but cannot reorganize the executive branch in violation of an act of Congress.

What is the President’s authority to reorganize the executive branch? The Constitution vests authority in Congress as an instance of its power to enact legislation; to create the departments, agencies, and offices within the executive branch; to define their duties; and to fund their activities. The President may create, reorganize, or abolish an office that he established, but he cannot fundamentally reorganize the executive branch in direct violation of an act of Congress.

The President traditionally has “acquiesce[ed] in the need for reorganization legislation in order to restructure or consolidate agencies within the Executive Branch.”1
Limitations on Presidential Power to Create a New Executive Branch Entity to Receive and Administer Funds Under Foreign Aid Legislation, 9 Op. O.L.C. 76, 78 (1985).
Prior Reorganization Acts were valuable to the President, in part because they incorporated expedited parliamentary procedures, and to Congress because they included a one-house legislative veto. But in 1983, the Supreme Court of the United States, in INS v. Chadha, found the legislative veto to be unconstitutional.2
INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).
While Reagan-era legislation purported to offer a procedure to preserve presidential reorganization authority, that authority has never been used and so remains untested.3
See Reorganization Act Amendments of 1984, Pub. L. 98-614, 98 Stat. 3192 (1984) (expired 1984) (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 901 (1984)), pertinent parts published supra as appendix; Ronald C. Moe, Administrative Renewal: Reorganization Commissions in the 20th Century 114–117 (2003).
The most recent Reorganization Act expired in 1984.

The President retains whatever reorganization authority Congress has delegated to him by law, as well as the ability to develop task forces and commissions and to work with Congress on reorganization plans. The exact limits of the President’s authority to reorganize the executive branch “can properly be analyzed only in light of the particular changes which are proposed” and the relevant statutory authority.4
President’s Authority to Promulgate a Reorganization Plan Involving the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1 Op. O.L.C. 248, 251 (1977).

Does the President Have Authority Under Article II of the U.S. Constitution to Reorganize the Executive Branch on His Own?

Article II of the U.S. Constitution provides three potential sources of authority for the President to reorganize the executive branch on his own. Each, however, falls short of that goal.

First, the Executive Vesting Clause specifies that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”5
U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 1.
This grants the President “those authorities that were traditionally wielded by executives” subject to constitutional constraints.6
“Hence the President cannot declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, or regulate commerce, even though executives had often wielded such authority in the past.” And “the President cannot make treaties or appointments without the advice and consent of the Senate. Likewise, the President’s pardon power is limited to offenses against the United States and does not extend to impeachments or violations of state law.” Sai Prakash, Executive Vesting Clause, in The Heritage Guide to the Constitution,!/articles/2/essays/76/executive-vesting-clause (last visited May 9, 2017).
The Founders did not leave this as a kingly power to change government functions at will. Rather, the power to execute the laws extends only as far as the laws allow.7
See, e.g., Centralizing Border Control Policy Under the Supervision of the Attorney General, 26 Op. O.L.C. 22 (2002); Steven G. Calabresi & Saikrishna Prakash, The President’s Power to Execute the Laws, 104 Yale L.J. 541 (1994); Prakash, supra note 6 (arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court “apparently has accepted the notion that the Executive Vesting Clause grants powers beyond those enumerated in the remainder of Article II”) (citing Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926); Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982); Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988)).
For entities created by Congress, the power to enact, amend, or abolish these executive departments and agencies and their functions belongs to Congress.8
See U.S. Const. art. I, § 1 (“All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”); INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983); Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998) (holding that the President’s line-item veto granted by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 was unconstitutional).
Article II’s Take Care Clause—that “[The President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”9
U.S. Const. Art. II, § 3. “The Take Care Clause…is best read as a duty that qualifies the President’s executive power.” Sai Prakash, Take Care Clause, in The Heritage Guide to the Constitution,!/articles/2/essays/98/take-care-clause (last visited May 13, 2017).
—“refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker. The Constitution limits his functions in the lawmaking process to the recommending of laws he thinks wise and the vetoing of laws he thinks bad.”10
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 587 (1952); see also Cass R. Sunstein & Lawrence Lessig, The President and the Administration, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 1, 60–69 (1994).

Yet the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the Executive Vesting Clause did not compel the President to execute the laws alone.11
“He must execute them by the assistance of subordinates.” Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 117 (1926).
“To aid him in the performance of these duties, he is authorized to appoint certain officers, who act by his authority and in conformity with his orders.”12
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 166 (1803).
May the President therefore reorganize the executive branch through subordinates in executive departments and agencies? Two more Article II clauses are pertinent, but the answer remains no.

Second, the Appointments Clause reads, “The President…shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint…[the] Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law.”13
U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2.
That provision enables the President to select officers who will implement his policies.14
Alexander Hamilton explained that department heads “ought to be considered as the [President’s] assistants or deputies…and on this account they…ought to be subject to his superintendence.” The Federalist No. 72, at 436.
Subject to statutory restrictions,15
See Morrison, 487 U.S. 654 (“independent counsel provisions of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978” did not violate separation of powers); Sunstein & Lessig, supra note 10, at 116–17.
the President may remove those who prove obstinate,16
See Myers, 272 U.S. at 135; The Jewels of the Princess of Orange, 2 Op. Att’y Gen. 482, 489 (1831) (the President’s power of “removal of the disobedient officer, and the substitution of one more worthy in his place, would enable the President, through him, faithfully to execute the law”).
but the power to appoint and remove officers “alone does not ensure that all decisions made by administrative officials will accord with the President’s views and priorities.”17
Elena Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 2245, 2385 n.307 (2001).

Third, the Opinion Clause enables the President to “require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.”18
U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1. See also Akhil R. Amar, Some Opinions on the Opinion Clause, 82 Va. L. Rev. 647 (1996); Vasan Kesavan & J. Gregory Sidak, The Legislator-in-Chief, 44 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1, 8 (2002) (The “clause implies the specification of orders to, and the evaluation of the performance by, someone to whom the President has delegated executive power. The analogy is to a principal and agent relationship.”).
This allows the President to obtain information from, and to “consult with and try to persuade,” his subordinates in the course of their official conduct.19
Peter L. Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch, 84 Colum. L. Rev. 573, 669 (1984). Executive branch “officers cannot keep the President in the dark about how their departments are operating.” Gillian E. Metzger, The Constitutional Duty to Supervise, 124 Yale L.J. 1836, 1879 (2015).
President George Washington used this process to direct subordinates’ official actions, but the relevant statutes “commonly delegated final authority directly to him.”20
Harvey C. Mansfield, Reorganizing the Federal Executive Branch: The Limits of Institutionalization, 35 L. & Contemporary Problems 462, 463 (1970).
These provisions do not enable the President to reorganize the executive branch on his own or though subordinates.21
See Amar, supra, note 18, at 653 (“Even as the sole apex of awesome [executive] powers…the President appears as a limited figure—as a Generalissimo, CEO, and Executioner under law.”); Peter L. Strauss, Overseer, or “The Decider”? The President in Administrative Law, 75 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 696 (2007); Kathryn A. Watts, Proposing a Place for Politics in Arbitrary and Capricious Review, 119 Yale L.J. 2, 60 n.264 (2009) (citing Sierra Club v. Costle, 657 F.2d 298, 410 (D.C. Cir. 1981), for the idea that “an administrative rulemaking may be overturned on the grounds of political pressure if ‘the content of the pressure…is designed to force [the agency] to decide upon factors not made relevant by Congress in the applicable statute’ and if the agency’s determination was actually affected by the ‘extraneous considerations.’”).

Congress, not the President or the U.S. Constitution, creates and organizes the offices and departments that the Appointments and Opinion Clauses address by virtue of the Necessary and Proper Clause.22
U.S. Const. art I, § 8, cl. 18 (“The Congress shall have Power To…make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.”); M’Culloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819); Edward Corwin, The President: Office and Powers 83 (1948).
“The organizational function of this clause was recognized from the outset. Among Congress’s first acts were establishing executive departments and staffs.”23
When the First Congress created the Treasury Department, for example, it established therein “distinct offices—Secretary, Comptroller, Auditor, Treasurer and Register—and their duties.”24
Mansfield, supra note 20, at 463.
Congress sets “to whatever degree it chooses, the internal organization of agencies,” their missions, “personnel systems, confirmation of executive officials, and funding, and ultimately evaluates whether the agency shall continue in existence.”25
Cong. Res. Serv., RL30876, The President’s Reorganization Authority: Review and Analysis 2 (Mar. 8, 2001) (hereafter CRS 2001).

Congress may delegate broad authority to executive branch officials to implement, change, and even reorganize their functions.26
See Kendall v. U.S. ex rel. Stokes, 37 U.S. 524, 610 (1838) (“There are certain political duties imposed upon many officers in the executive department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper…and in such cases, the duty and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of the law, and not to the direction of the President.”); Isbrandtsen-Moller Co. v. United States, 300 U.S. 139 (1937) (upholding a secretarial order enforced after an executive reorganization plan).
The First Congress, however, “set a precedent” of delegating “statutory powers and instructions…to specified officials of or below Cabinet rank, rather than to the President.”27
Mansfield, supra note 20, at 463.
The President’s Article II authority to oversee those powers does not amount to directing every decision that is made by someone within the executive branch.28
See Kagan, supra note 17.

Congress can also use the Appropriations Clause to curb the President’s reorganization efforts, even efforts authorized by substantive statutes.29
U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 7 (“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”).
The power of the purse remains “the most complete and effectual weapon” against “carrying into effect” an executive reorganization plan and any other “just and salutary measure.”30
James Madison, The Federalist No. 58. For instance, in 1989, the U.S. Department of Justice sent Congress its plans to reorganize the Office of Legal Policy under statutory authority to undertake “significant reprogramming, reorganizations, and relocations” within the department. “[C]ertain Congressmen” disapproved and barred any further implementation of departmental reorganization schemes by writing the following into appropriations law: “None of the funds provided in this or any prior Act shall be available for obligation or expenditure to relocate, reorganize, or consolidate any office, agency, function, facility, station, activity, or other entity falling under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.” See Department of Justice Authority Regarding Relocations, Reorganizations, and Consolidations, 13 Op. O.L.C. 280, 281 (Aug. 28, 1989).
An executive branch officer’s statutory authority to execute reorganization schemes “can only be affected by passage of a new law.”31
13 Op. O.L.C. at 283 (citing INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983)).
But Congress can simply amend an appropriations law if it does not like where reorganization is headed,32
See United States v. Dickerson, 310 U.S. 554, 555 (1940).
and the Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits officers and employees of the U.S. government from going around the will of Congress in any way that involves incurring obligations in excess of appropriated funds.33
31 U.S.C.A. § 1341 (West) (1990).

The result is that the President does not have constitutional authority to reorganize the executive branch on his own.

Does the President Have Statutory Authority to Reorganize the Executive Branch?

Under current law, the President has no statutory authority to reorganize the executive branch, except where acts of Congress delegate authority to make particular changes.34
See William G. Howell & David E. Lewis, Agencies by Presidential Design, 64 J. Politics 1095, 1096 (2002) (identifying “over 240 administrative agencies” that Presidents “constructed” after 1950 “through executive orders, orders issued by department secretaries or agency heads, and reorganization plans”); John Yoo & Todd Gaziano, Presidential Authority to Revoke or Reduce National Monument Designations, Am. Enterprise Inst. 8 (Mar. 2017) (“A basic principle of the Constitution is that a branch of government can reverse its earlier actions using the same process originally used.”); Harold J. Krent, From a Unitary to a Unilateral Presidency, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 523 554–59 (2008) (criticizing unilateral executive reorganization).

In 1932, Congress first enacted law delegating to the President broad authority to reorganize the executive branch according to specific guidelines.35
See Isbrandtsen-Moller, 300 U.S. 147 (noting that a 1932 appropriations law authorized the President to abolish or transfer functions of “‘any commission, board, bureau, division, service, or office in the executive branch of the Government’”).
Since then, nine Presidents have sought and secured similar authority from Congress.36
They are Presidents Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan. See Cong. Res. Serv., RL31446, Reorganizing the Executive Branch in the 20th Century: Landmark Commissions (June 10, 2002) (hereafter CRS 2002). Past reorganization plans have shaped much of the modern executive branch. For example, they created the Department of Health, Education and Welfare; Drug Enforcement Agency; Environmental Protection Agency; and Federal Emergency Management Agency (see Howell & Lewis, supra note 34, at 1097) and established the Executive Office of the President. See Cong. Res. Serv., R42852, Henry B. Hogue, Presidential Reorganization Authority: History, Recent Initiatives, and Options for Congress 31–32 (Dec. 11, 2012) (hereafter CRS 2012).
The last to exercise that authority was Jimmy Carter; the last to receive it was Ronald Reagan. The most recent Reorganization Act expired in December 1984.37
See CRS 2001, supra note 25, at n.1. Presidents George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton did not seek statutory reorganization authority. See CRS 2012, supra note 36.
Since then, Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama sought reorganization power from Congress,38
CRS 2012, supra note 36, at 32.
which introduced but did not enact legislation that would have granted them reorganization authority.39
See H.R. 10, § 5021 (108th Congress) and S. 2129 (112th Congress) and H.R. 4409 (112th Congress).

The history of delegated legislative authority for Presidents to reorganize the executive branch is informative for future usage with one caveat. Those acts were valuable in part because they provided expedited parliamentary procedures—in particular, a one-house legislative veto, which enabled either house of Congress to reject a President’s reorganization plan.40
See Chadha, 462 U.S. 919; CRS 2012, supra note 36; Louis Fisher, The Legislative Veto: Invalidated, It Survives, 56 L. & Contemporary Problems 273 (1993).
In 1983, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the one-house veto violated the U.S. Constitution’s bicameralism and presentment requirements for lawmaking.41
Chadha, 462 U.S. 919. But see Effect of INS v. Chadha on the Authority of the Secretary of Defense to Reorganize the Department of Defense Under U.S.C. § 125, 8 Op. O.L.C. 82, 93 (1984) (arguing that prior “reorganization authority survives the fall of the veto”).
In 1984, Congress enacted an alternate procedure along with reorganization authority: “that a joint resolution be introduced in both the House and Senate upon receipt of a reorganization plan.”42
CRS 2001, supra note 25, at 8. See Reorganization Act Amendments of 1984, Pub. L. 98-614, 98 Stat. 3192 (1984) (expired 1984) (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 901 (1984)), pertinent parts published infra as appendix.
No vote, no plan; no presidential signature, no plan. While that seems to follow the constitutional lawmaking process, President Reagan never used his reorganization authority, and these procedures remain untested.43
See Moe, supra note 3, at 114–117.

As a result, the President currently has no general statutory authority to reorganize the executive branch. 44
Arguably, “what little advantage remained in the reorganization plan process, namely an expedited procedure with a guaranteed vote, was more than matched by the disadvantages of” other procedural and substantive requirements. Id. at 116–17. So “[i]n short,” it may be easier “to simply follow the regular legislative process.” Id. But if left entirely to Congress, “we will fiddle around here all summer trying to satisfy every lobbyist, and we will get nowhere.” Fisher, supra note 40, at 278 (citing 75 Cong. Rec. 9644 (1932) (statement of Sen. David Reed (R–PA))).
Yet Congress could decide to enact a law similar to the last-used Reorganization Act of 1977 or one of its progenitors.45
See generally CRS 2012, supra note 36. The 1977 Act offered broad authority to consolidate inter- and intra-agency functions as well as “the abolition of all or a part of the functions of an agency, except” for any “enforcement function or statutory program.” 5 U.S.C. § 903. It also prohibited the President from certain actions such as creating, abolishing, or completely consolidating any executive departments. See 5 U.S.C. § 905 (1977); CRS 2001, supra note 25, at 6.
Even without statutory authority, the President may convene a task force or commission to study concerns within the executive branch and recommend changes to Congress.46
For instance, in 1993, President Bill Clinton “simply announced” the creation of a National Performance Review with “no statutory authority,” staff, funding, or “work plan.” CRS 2002, supra note 36, at 91. Vice President Al Gore shaped it into an interagency task force to make the executive branch leaner and more entrepreneurial. It eventually claimed to have ended “the era of big government,” “reduced the size of the federal civilian workforce by 426,200 positions,” and delivered “savings of more than $136 billion…by eliminating what wasn’t needed.” Id. at 96.
History provides several examples that met with varying degrees of success.47
See generally Mansfield, supra note 20; John W. Lederle, The Hoover Commission Reports on Federal Reorganization, 33 Marq. L. Rev. 89, 91 (1949); Harry S. Truman Library Inst., Truman and the Hoover Commission, 19 Whistle Stop (1991),


The President may be able to accomplish some reorganization goals through particular statutory delegations of authority, executive orders, department memos, management policies, and other devices. But to accomplish major reorganization objectives, he will need explicit statutory authority from Congress, a viable post-Chadha procedure to enact reorganization plans,48
See CRS 2001, supra note 25, at 8 (discussing H.R. 1314 and the Reorganization Act of 1984).
and a feasible implementation strategy.49
See GGD-81-57, Report of the U.S. General Accounting Office to the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, Implementation: The Missing Link in Planning Reorganizations (Mar. 20, 1981), (advising that implementation plans will help to avoid past staffing, funding, office space, accounting systems, and other problems that distracted officials from their missions).
As for the details of any reorganization plan, exact limits on the President’s authority to reorganize the executive branch “can properly be analyzed only in light of the particular changes which are proposed” and the relevant constitutional provisions and statutory authority.50
1 Op. O.L.C. 248, 251.

—Paul J. Larkin, Jr., is Senior Legal Research Fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, of the Institute for Constitutional Government, at The Heritage Foundation. John-Michael Seibler is a Legal Fellow in the Meese Center.


Reorganization Act Amendments of 1984, Pub. L. 98-614, 98 Stat. 3192 (1984) (expired 1984) (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 901 (1984))

5 U.S.C. § 903—Reorganization plans:

(a) Whenever the President, after investigation, finds that changes in the organization of agencies are necessary to carry out any policy set forth in section 901(a) of this title, he shall prepare a reorganization plan specifying the reorganizations he finds are necessary. Any plan may provide for—

(1) the transfer of the whole or a part of an agency, or of the whole or a part of the functions thereof, to the jurisdiction and control of another agency;

(2) the abolition of all or a part of the functions of an agency, except that no enforcement function or statutory program shall be abolished by the plan;

(3) the consolidation or coordination of the whole or a part of an agency, or of the whole or a part of the functions thereof, with the whole or a part of another agency or the functions thereof;

(4) the consolidation or coordination of part of an agency or the functions thereof with another part of the same agency or the functions thereof;

(5) the authorization of an officer to delegate any of his functions; or

(6) the abolition of the whole or a part of an agency which agency or part does not have, or on the taking effect of the reorganization plan will not have, any functions.

The President shall transmit the plan (bearing an identification number) to the Congress together with a declaration that, with respect to each reorganization included in the plan, he has found that the reorganization is necessary to carry out any policy set forth in section 901(a) of this title.

(b) The President shall have a reorganization plan delivered to both Houses on the same day and to each House while it is in session, except that no more than three plans may be pending before the Congress at one time. In his message transmitting a reorganization plan, the President shall specify with respect to each abolition of a function included in the plan the statutory authority for the exercise of the function. The message shall also estimate any reduction or increase in expenditures (itemized so far as practicable), and describe any improvements in management, delivery of Federal services, execution of the laws, and increases in efficiency of Government operations, which it is expected will be realized as a result of the reorganizations included in the plan. In addition, the President’s message shall include an implementation section which shall (1) describe in detail (A) the actions necessary or planned to complete the reorganization, (B) the anticipated nature and substance of any orders, directives, and other administrative and operational actions which are expected to be required for completing or implementing the reorganization, and (C) any preliminary actions which have been taken in the implementation process, and (2) contain a projected timetable for completion of the implementation process. The President shall also submit such further background or other information as the Congress may require for its consideration of the plan.

(c) Any time during the period of 60 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to it, but before any resolution described in section 909 has been ordered reported in either House, the President may make amendments or modifications to the plan, consistent with sections 903–905 of this title, which modifications or revisions shall thereafter be treated as a part of the reorganization plan originally transmitted and shall not affect in any way the time limits otherwise provided for in this chapter. The President may withdraw the plan any time prior to the conclusion of 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress following the date on which the plan is submitted to Congress.

5 U.S.C. § 908—Rules of Senate and House of Representatives on reorganization plans:

Sections 909 through 912 of this title are enacted by Congress—

(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such they are deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, but applicable only with respect to the procedure to be followed in that House in the case of resolutions with respect to any reorganization plans transmitted to Congress (in accordance with section 903(b) of this chapter [1]) on or before December 31, 1984; and they supersede other rules only to the extent that they are inconsistent therewith; and

(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.

5 U.S.C. § 909—Terms of resolution:

For the purpose of sections 908 through 912 of this title, “resolution” means only a joint resolution of the Congress, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That the Congress approves the reorganization plan numbered      transmitted to the Congress by the President on   , 19  .”, and includes such modifications and revisions as are submitted by the President under section 903(c) of this chapter. The blank spaces therein are to be filled appropriately. The term does not include a resolution which specifies more than one reorganization plan.

5 U.S.C. § 910—Introduction and reference of resolution:

(a) No later than the first day of session following the day on which a reorganization plan is transmitted to the House of Representatives and the Senate under section 903, a resolution, as defined in section 909, shall be introduced (by request) in the House by the chairman of the Government Operations Committee of the House, or by a Member or Members of the House designated by such chairman; and shall be introduced (by request) in the Senate by the chairman of the Governmental Affairs Committee of the Senate, or by a Member or Members of the Senate designated by such chairman.

(b) A resolution with respect to a reorganization plan shall be referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Operations of the House (and all resolutions with respect to the same plan shall be referred to the same committee) by the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as the case may be. The committee shall make its recommendations to the House of Representatives or the Senate, respectively, within 75 calendar days of continuous session of Congress following the date of such resolution’s introduction.

5 U.S.C. § 911—Discharge of committee considering resolution:

If the committee to which is referred a resolution introduced pursuant to subsection (a) of section 910 (or, in the absence of such a resolution, the first resolution introduced with respect to the same reorganization plan) has not reported such resolution or identical resolution at the end of 75 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after its introduction, such committee shall be deemed to be discharged from further consideration of such resolution and such resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar of the House involved.

5 U.S.C. § 912—Procedure after report or discharge of committee; debate; vote on final passage:

(a) When the committee has reported, or has been deemed to be discharged (under section 911) from further consideration of, a resolution with respect to a reorganization plan, it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for any Member of the respective House to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution. The motion is highly privileged and is not debatable. The motion shall not be subject to amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the respective House until disposed of.

(b) Debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than ten hours, which shall be divided equally between individuals favoring and individuals opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. An amendment to, or a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in order. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is passed or rejected shall not be in order.

(c) Immediately following the conclusion of the debate on the resolution with respect to a reorganization plan, and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the appropriate House, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur.

(d) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a resolution with respect to a reorganization plan shall be decided without debate.

(e) If, prior to the passage by one House of a resolution of that House, that House receives a resolution with respect to the same reorganization plan from the other House, then—

(1) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other House; but

(2) the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House.


Dr Churchill


“Make certain to rest in reason and move in passion.” – Kahlil Gibran


It’s up to us ordinary patriots to pray, protect and support our People’s President and to suffer if needed be in the barricades as we fight the Good Fight against the forces of darkness and evil.

Let’s all pray and stand together patriots because this is the time of grave danger:

Screen Shot 2018-08-11 at 9.40.51 PM

Join me to do just that this September in the Heartland here:

Join “God, Arms, & Covenant, Conference” in Vantage, WA, on September 14th -16th

Friday, Sep 14, 2018, 5:00 PM

Holy Ground Pavilion
551 Main Street Vantage, wa

14 Churchillians Attending

This is the 80th anniversary edition of the “GOD, ARMS, & COVENANT” conference, started by Winston Churchill in 1938 to fight-off the National Socialists, the Defeatists, the Appeasers, the Fascists, and the Atheists, in order to protect the Nation, the Republic, and the Constitution. This is the same situation as the American Churchill faces today…

Check out this Meetup →

Or find yourself starting from here and join up:

God Bless the Patriots and God Bless America!

Now it’s time to wake up and take action.

Please keep in mind that:

“100% of the shots you dont take don’t go in.”
-Wayne Gretzki

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Forty Nine
“Special Prosecutor Mueller is toast”


While researching the book SpyGate — I became convinced that my suspicions about the true origin and motive behind the Trump Salacious Dossier, had nothing to do with Trump or Russia, but instead it was all part of a desperate distraction and cover-up attempt on the part of a sizable team of Clinton operatives within the Obama Administration to cover up their crimes and misdeeds while in control of the White House.

It becomes clearer by the day, that every piece of evidence used to fuel the Trump Russia hoax and the Russia Hacked our Election Narrative and attendant witch-hunt, was part of a well planned and executed insurance policy hatched from late 2015 – to Mar 2016, involving perhaps hundreds of individuals, many with deep links back into the dark Clinton past, Madeleine Albright, Podesta, Biden, Leiberman, Victoria Nuland, Susan Rice, Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, and many others.

Yesterday we found out that DOJ’s Bruce Ohr wrote Christopher Steele was “very concerned about Comey’s firing — afraid they will be exposed.”

Screen Shot 2018-07-30 at 10.42.13 AM

Documents unsealed now, have revealed that DOJ’s Bruce Ohr was deeply connected to Trump dossier creative writing author Christopher Steele… as indeed Bruce Ohr’s work emails show contacts with Christopher Steele during the 2016 campaign;
A collection of Justice Department official Bruce Ohr’s emails, texts and handwritten notes, reviewed by News reporters, reveals that he was deeply connected to the unverified Christopher Steele “Russian Dossier” as well as its author, and during the presidential election campaign of 2016, Bruce Ohr was involved in the government surveillance abuses involving the Trump campaign officials, who were targeted and surveilled or entrapped and sabotaged.

For example, the “Russian Dossier” which was used by federal officials to justify the surveillance of top Trump aides, like Mr Carter Page, was created by Fusion GPS and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, through he extreme leftist partisan and corrupt Law Firm from Seattle, Perkins Coie. It was then that Bruce Ohr noted, that Christopher Steele, the ex-British spy who wrote the salacious dossier, was “very concerned about former FBI Director James Comey’s firing — afraid that they will be exposed.”

The cache of documents from Bruce Ohr, sheds more light on British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s activities before the presidential election of 2016, because while Steele shopped the dossier to multiple media outlets, he also asked Bruce Ohr for help with a Russian oligarch — Oleg Deripaska — after rumors surfaced that the US might impose new sanctions towards Russia.

Therefore it was obvious that Bruce Ohr had a conflict of interest during the 2016 presidential campaign and transition period, according to congressional investigators, and further he should have recused himself, because his wife Nellie Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS. And Christopher Steele, an ex-British spy, was a key source cited by the FBI and Department of Justice, when they sought to obtain a FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) warrant, in order to surveillance and monitor Carter Page of the Trump campaign.

It’s here that the FBI knowingly lied, when they said to the FISA Court four consecutive times that Christopher Steele was not the source of the “Russian Dossier” report that was used to justify the application for the wiretaps of the Trump campaign, for the spies inserted in the inner circle of the Campaign, and for the surveillance of Carter Page.

Because even after the FBI dropped Christopher Steele as a reliable “source” in November 2016 because of his leaking information to his contacts with the MSM media, the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee found that Steele had maintained contact with all of the FBI’s top government officials, and with the later to become Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller, by effectively using Bruce Ohr of the FBI, as a back channel of communications.

During recent congressional testimony, now-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok confirmed, that “the FBI received documents and material from Mr. Ohr.”

Subsequently, President Trump had terminated former CIA Director John Brennan’s security clearance, and was reviewing the clearances of several other former officials. Sanders read a statement from Trump that cited what he described as Brennan’s misleading testimony before Congress and his increasingly partisan rhetoric, saying Brennan improperly traded on his access to classified information.

“For this reason, I’ve also begun to review the more general question of the access to classified information by government officials,” Trump’s statement read. “As part of this review I’m evaluating action with respect to the following individuals: James Clapper, James Comey, Michael Hayden, Sally Yates, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Bruce Ohr.”

It is important to note that Bruce Ohr is the only Obama appointed operative and high standing official on that list, that is still working within the U.S. government.

During closed-door congressional testimony last year, the co-founder of Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, claimed he had no contact with Bruce Ohr, until after the presidential election. Yet Bruce Ohr’s work emails conflict with Simpson’s testimony, and show that the two of them had several contacts many months earlier. That further proves that Glenn Simpson lies constantly and that his fake “Russian Dossier” is exactly that.

Indeed, Bruce Ohr’s text messages, personal notes, and official memos that he drafted, also indicate that in December 2016, there was a meeting in WashingtonDC Chinatown, between Fusion GPS’ boss Glenn Simpson and Bruce Ohr, with Bruce Ohr writing, “Glen(n) gave me a memory stick.”

Reacting to the news late Thursday, President Trump suggested the disclosures were more proof of a “witch hunt” against him, and that Brennan was the orchestrator and the behind the scenes man of the Coup D’Etat.

Trump wrote on the Twitter page of @realDonaldTrump: “DOJ’s emails & notes show Bruce Ohr’s connection to the phony & discredited Russian Dossier. A creep thinking he would not get caught in a dishonest act. Rigged Witch Hunt!”

Now, Bruce Ohr will be interrogated and will b e given a chance to tell his side of the story, on Aug. 28th when a closed-door interview is scheduled with the House oversight and judiciary committees as part of their joint investigation into the FBI and DOJ’s conduct during the presidential election.

Yet in retrospect, we can safely now say that indeed April 10th of 2016, is the day that the process of fairness and justice fell down in America, because of Obama’s support for exonerating Hillary Clinton, and James Comey obeying his Master’s dog whistle call.

April 10th 2016 will live in infamy as the day Barack Obama publicly commented regarding an ongoing FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton and her use of a Private Email server in her time as Obama’s Secretary of State, claiming Clinton had been extremely careless but had not intended to harm the national interest, comments famously repeated by James Comey months later when he was exonerating Clinton before even any cursory investigation of her crimes had transpired.

Now, new evidence proves Barack Hussein Obama not only interfered to summarily clear Hillary Clinton of Criminal Charges that day, we now know president Obama spent 14 hours in a meeting on 10th of April, of 2016, inside the White House with the likes of Mary Jacoby, (Glenn Simpson wife), Sally Yates, Susan Rice, etc, wherein Obama sanctioned the illegal scheme that he understood would ensure the GOP candidate for president, Donald J Trump, (his political opponent) would never see the inside of the White House, let alone become the 45th President of the United States.

The 10th of April, of 2016, is the day marked in infamy, because it signified the genesis of the Coup D’Etat that Obama ordered, and his minion Hillary Clinton paid for, and their minions like Brennan orchestrated and executed, against our Republic, and against America itself.

Yet by the Grace of God — they were stymied and stoped. They were flummoxed and our Fortunes changed massively, to the point that we won the game.

The whole of that day April 10th of 2016, saw The President of the United States of America involved in initiating and ordering the Coup D’Etat, against America. Obama’s idea was to get it started as an obstruction of Justice to protect Hillary Clinton, and then prepare her for becoming the next President of this Republic, by sinking her opponent Donald J Trump.

This was the Agenda when Obama on the 10th of April, of 2016, was meeting with the errant woman named Mary Jacoby, the wife of FusionGPS boss Glenn Simpson, for 14 hours, along with all his select top staff, including the evil islamist Valerie Jarett.

Even now very few people are aware of Mary Jacoby’s role as one of the authors & architects of the Coup D’Etat starting out as a scheme to manufacture a “Dirty Trump Dossier” that was to become a part of a much wider scheme designed to implicate the Trump campaign as having colluded with Russia. This was the tip of the spear, the top of the iceberg that would sink the Titanic. Titanic means Mr Big, otherwise known as Mr Donald J Trump. This Jacoby was the textual author of the Russian Dossier, that was to also have a second act as the so-called “insurance policy” that would guarantee there would be no President Trump, even if he had won the 2016 Election.

But since Trump won first the primaries, and took the nomination of the GOP, and then he went on to win the general US election — this fake “Russian Dossier” was eventually being used by the FBI and Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller in order to impeach President Trump — simply because he dared to win against Hillary Clinton who was the daring of the Banksters and all the broken people.

Trump had to be punished because he won.

Mary Jacoby even boasted about her involvement in writing the “Dossier” when in a Facebook post, of June 24, 2017, (seen in screenshots), Mary Jacoby claimed that her husband deserves the lion’s share of credit for what she termed then as the Russiagate — the name used by the Coup D’Etat leaders to attach a heavy stone on the neck of the President before they throw him overboard in the Potomac River.

This is what Mary Jacoby wrote: “It’s come to my attention that some people still don’t realize what Glenn’s role was in exposing Putin’s control of Donald Trump. Let’s be clear. Glenn conducted the investigation. Glenn hired Chris Steele. Chris Steele worked for Glenn.”

Not only is Mary Jacoby the wife of the guy who is behind the creative writing, the compiling, the legitimizing, and the “selling” of the “Russian dossier” that was a flight of the imagination of President Obama coming out of a Stoner’s trash talk, but as Christopher Steele and Glenn Simpson knew, this was a totally fabricated document. And as we now know, this so called — Made in Russia — “Russian Dossier” was submitted as evidence to the FISA Court judges, by senior FBI prosecutors, including former Director James Comey and his Deputy Director Andy McCabe. This fake “Made In Russia” salacious garbage, containing supposedly compromising material dossier (Copromat), was used in order to obtain the FISA court’s permission for wiretaps, spying, entrapment, espionage, provocations and general mayhem, unleashed by Obama on his political opponent, candidate Donald Trump, and against his people, and against all of his political electoral campaign.

How is that not a subversion of our Democratic Electoral Ethos?

How is that not a Coup D’Etat?

And how is that travesty of Justice Robert Mueller’s investigation still allowed to be continued?

Most of the textual evidence points to Glenn Simpson, and his wife Mary Jacoby as the architects of the “Russian Dossier” framework. On April 10, 2016, Mary Jacoby showed up on White House visitor logs, meeting with President Obama and his top officials, and she doesn’t leave for 14 hours. That same month, April 2016, the Clinton Campaign and DNC, hired Fusion-GPS and paid them via extremely leftist and corrupt law firm Perkins-Coie from Seattle, in order to compose, assemble, white-wash, and legitimize, the so called “Russian Dossier Research paper” which later became known as the “Russian dossier.” This is the fake Russian Dossier, whose bogus and fake content, led to the “Insurance Policy” that is the unleashing of the Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s efforts to impeach a duly elected President of this country for no reason whatsoever, besides the slanderous political assassination bullets, fired by the tools of the corrupt FBI, the Obama White House, and Hillary Clinton herself.

It is important to remember that Mary Jacoby is the wife of Fusion-GPS head, Mr Glenn Simpson, who has routinely lied to Congress and Senate investigation committees, when questioned about all this.

When it comes to the research, promotion, and distribution work, the linkage shows that a fair amount of ‘staging’ activity took place both in the US (in the pre dossier stages) and in the UK; and involved such dirty, low-life, and compromised individuals, as Stefan Halper, Jonathan Clarke, Richard Dearlove, Charles Crawford, Iain Lobban, and Alexander Downer.

The same type of staging and delivery took place in the US through the State department sources like Robert Otto and the political and PR work of Alexandra Chalupa, Natalie Budaeva, and Ilya Zaslavskiy and their pro-Ukraine “Free Russia Foundation” NGOs. It is notable that a lot of this activity dates to first week of April-May 2016, almost 8 weeks before Steele’s official June 2016 contract with Fusion GPS.

This strongly suggests that there was a proto-dossier in place already. An earlier document (boiler plate) used as a cookie cutter, and that there was a wider coordinated effort between the US and the UK teams, with Orbis Business Intelligence outfit, likely acting as a front for Hakluyt & Co.

Bruce Ohr’s and Baumgartner’s roles were likely to research specific Russian content and re-write the narrative in “Russian style” in order to make it appear authentic.

From early 2015 when Trump announced his intention to run, Podesta and Clinton were planning first of all how to get Clinton cleared of any charges, and hanging “chaff” from her profiteering as the head of State Department, and how to assure that her involvement in sparking the Arab Spring and Colour Movement Coups, and attempted Coups, in Libya, Egypt, Syria and Ukraine amongst others — would never come to light. They had to do all that because they needed to clear the plate in order to sanitize & sanctify her, so that she then can run as the Democrat candidate for President of the US, and to be guaranteed to win.

We now know that as early as May 1st of 2016 Robert Otto, was road testing the effectiveness of elements of what would eventually become known as the Trump Dossier.

However what is most extraordinary is that even the Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller was involved in the makings of this fake-news “Russian Dossier” from the beginning. We know this only because Bruce Ohr’s emails reveal that the “Russian Dossier” main author Christopher Steele, was in constant contact with Robert Mueller. Indeed, Bruce Ohr’s ties to the Deep State, the deeply compromised FBI, CIA, NSA, Obama, Clinton, and the “Russian Dossier” are growing deeper, longer, and even stronger every single day.

This has Robert Mueller fully compromised and he must have recessed himself — if he had any ethical and moral backbone — now that the contacts of Christopher, Steel, Glenn Simpson and Special Prosecutor Bob Mueller, have been shown to have grown exponentially, from the early days of the manufacturing of the fake “Russian Dossier.”

Because now, we’re learning that the “Russian Dossier” author Christopher Steele was in constant contact with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, making sure that the “Russian Dossier” is ready and up to snuff, so that they can start manufacturing the “Insurance Policy” that Peter Strzok wrote to his sex-bunny in his uncovered text messages… and that is none other than the effort to impeach the 45th President Donald Trump, leader of this Nation, and the most popular people’s President since Abraham Lincoln.

As for Mueller — can you not see the obvious conflict of interest, that he has since he was a bit player in this charade from the beginning?

The American people are already really tired of this sham investigation because it has gone far enough already, and has now been uncovered as what it truly is. Perhaps if there was some decency in the part of Robert “Dirty Cop” Mueller, or Rod Rosenstein, or Alfred Sessions — now would be the best and perhaps the last opportune time to shut it down, apologize to the American people, and perhaps escape the wrath that is justly going to be directed at them.

Because the Arc of the Universe, long as it is — it always veers towards Justice. And because we all know that if we follow the bread crumbs fully — the whole bunch of those practitioners of the Coup D’Etat against our country, will end up in jail for a very long time.

And because we have evidence that will put Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein and all their cohorts to Leavenworth for hundreds of years, and we share some of this here with you. Evidence, as when on June 2017, Christopher Steele tells Bruce Ohr this: “We are frustrated with how long this reengagement with the Bureau and Mueller is taking. Anything you can do to accelerate the process would be much appreciated. There are some new, perishable, operational opportunities which we do not want to miss out on.”

And again, in October 2017, Christopher Steele notes that he is concerned about the stories in the media about the bureau delivering information to Congress “about my work and relationship with them. Very concerned about this. People’s lives may be endangered.”

And in November 2017, Christopher Steele, who is also engaging with Robert Mueller the Special Counsel, writes to Bruce Ohr saying, “we were wondering if there was any response to the questions I raised last week.”
Bruce Ohr responds by saying, “I have passed on the questions to the special counsel, but haven’t gotten an answer yet.”

Christopher Steele then says, “I am presuming you’ve heard nothing back from your SC (special counsel) colleagues on the issues you kindly put to them from me. We have heard nothing from them either. To say this is disappointing would be an understatement! Certain people have been willing to risk everything to engage with them in an effort to help them reach the truth. Also, we remain in the dark as to what work has been briefed to Congress about us, our assets and previous work.”

“The existence of a proto-Russia-dossier that predates Christopher Steele’s work is further supported by an email written by Robert Otto, to John Williams, the director of the Office of Analysis for Russia and Eurasia in the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research. In this email titled “the fried document” and dated May 1, 2016, Otto comments on some of the building blocks of the future dossier including how effective or damaging various claims would be.”

From Stefan Halper, Mifsud, and Papadopoulos, to Steele, and to husband and wife team Ohr, with their obsession about manufacturing the Trump Dossier, all the way to CrowdStriks’s faux-claim that “Russia Hacked the DNC” report — they all link to The Atlantic Council, Soros, and then they are all linked back to Hillary Clinton and Obama, as long term friends, comrades, colleagues, and family.

The events outlined in Gerald Stones’ film “Ukraine on Fire” involve many of the same people and I am sure any informed analysis of events in Libya, Egypt and Syria would finger the same suspects.

Hillary Clinton’s home server was the spark that started the whole show, if anyone was let near the truth they were all at risk, so the great cover-up began.

Manafort and General Flynn knew way too much, so as soon as Trump approved them to work closely with him on his Campaign, they were singled out for attack and due to the cards being stacked against them — their fate was sealed.

If justice were left up to dirty cop Robert Mueller — crucifixion, or the next best thing would be the preferred punishment for those who helped Trump run an effective campaign effectively and win a whole unexpected victory.


Even Donald Trump Jr, was specifically targeted for a meeting at Trump Tower, it was a set-up in the same way every other offer of information from Russians or invitation to meet someone with Russian intel, was organised, co-ordinated, set-up, and paid for, by the Clinton-Obama connections.

Now, let’s examine the threads that connect all of these dirty minded treasonous individuals, and let us examine the provable links that bind these Anti-American forces together, as they are attempting to carry out their Coup D’Etat against America…

Let us start from Mary Jacoby (wife of FusionGPS boss/husband Glenn Simpson) and her 14 hours meeting with Obama to get the Stoner Commander In Chief download, of how to do this “By The Book.” To help you understand how Fusion GPS works and where it fits in, I have selected the next few excerpts from the full text of SpyGate…

Brendan Power: Fusion GPS Connections to Clinton Operatives. Glenn Simpson and his wife Mary Jacoby knew Bruce and Nellie Ohr from their days at the International Assessment and Strategy Center as early as 2004. Simpson and Jacoby knew and worked with Stefan Halper at the WSJ since 1996. They also knew Steele from their days at the WSJ going back to 2009.

FusionGPS Staff: Glenn Simpson, Mary Jacoby, Peter Fritsch, Neil King, Tom Catan: Jacoby knew and worked with Christopher Steele, Nellie Ohr, Peter Strzok and his wife Melissa Hodgman — the Associate Director in SEC Enforcement Division, Peter Fritsch, Neil King Jr. and his wife Shailagh Murray, David Kramer, Jonathan Winer, and Sidney Blumenthal who worked with her at Salon in 2004.

Sidney Blumenthal’s network is noteworthy because his email address book contains many of the dossier characters including Jacoby, Simpson, Winer, and others. It also contains most of the journalist involved in the ‘favorable’ dossier coverage. For example his friendly reporter count includes:

# News Outlet Number of reporters Blumenthal communicated with
1 The Guardian 49
2 New Yorker 16
3 New York Times 50
4 Washington Post 60

Keeping in mind Simpson’s and Jacoby’s paid interest in Manafort and Yanukovich, it is important to note that Rinat Akhmetshin, the alleged facilitator of the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya, is married to Lyudmila Vereshchagina — a Ukrainian national with ties to FISU who has been living in the US since 2008.

Both Akhmetshin and Vereshchagina knew and communicated with Simpson, Jacoby, and Alexandra Chalupa (the junkyard dog of the DNC) and were involved in the organization of anti-Putin/Yanukovich/Trump activity across the US.

Rinat Akhmetshin’s lawyer/partner was Edward Lieberman, who concurrently worked for the Albright Stonebridge Group and used the email account.

The Albright Stonebridge Group is a “Commercial Diplomacy” firm in Washington DC that is heavily involved with Ukrainian politics and lobbying activity in the US. Even more noteworthy, is Edward Lieberman’s wife, Evelyn Lieberman’s senior affiliation with the Clintons, Madeleine Albright and Joseph Biden.

The following short bio illustrates her political R&R from 1988-2015.
Evelyn Lieberman’s Political Bio
2002–2015: Director of communications and external affairs, Smithsonian Institution
1999–2001: Under secretary for public diplomacy & public affairs, for Madeleine Albright
1997–1999: Director of Voice of America
1996–1997: White House deputy chief of staff and assistant Bill Clinton
1994–1996: White House deputy press secretary for operations Bill Clinton
1993–1994: Assistant to the chief of staff in the Office of Hillary Clinton
1988–1993: (5 years) Press secretary for Senator Joseph Biden

Additionally, Robert Otto was sending and receiving updates from multiple sources such as, Nellie Ohr, David Kramer, Kyle Wilsonb, Andrew Wood, Richard Dearlove, and Michael Weiss, a CNN Investigative reporter for International Affairs, who was tracking and reporting on Veselnitskaya social media activity.

Jonathan Winer and Glenn Simpson and Douglas Farah linkage:
Jonathan Winer from the State Department knew Steele from mid-2000s. Winer also knew and worked with Glenn Simpson and Douglas Farah, his partner at IASC in 2004. Winer and Farah even cross endorsed each other on their LinkedIn profiles.
Nellie Ohr, Peter Fritsch, and Jonathan Clarke knew each other from the Wilson Center. Neil King Jr. from Fusion GPS is married to Shailagh Murray who was President Obama’s Senior Policy Advisor. She was also Joe Biden’s Deputy-Chief-of-Staff. King and Murray knew Steele, Kramer, Winer, and the Ohrs going back to the mid-2000s.

In 2010, several of the members of the future dossier team participated in a workshop dedicated to “Racketeering in Russia”.

In 2012, Steele did some work for the US state Department and was in communication with Winer and the Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. This was done directly and through Sir Andrew Wood, who was the former British Ambassador to Russia and an employee of Orbis.

Christopher Steele’s communications included over 100 reports on the Ukraine-Russia conflict. These reports were based on information from UK and Ukrainian government sources and contained political and financial data about Russian companies that was shared with Bruce Ohr at the DOJ.

When questioned about Steele’s relationship with Jonathan Winer, Victoria Nuland said: “During the Ukraine crisis in 2014-15, Chris Steele had a number of commercial clients who were asking him for reports on what was going on in Russia, what was going on in Ukraine, what was going on between them. Chris had a friend, Jonathan Winer, at the State Department and he offered us that reporting free so that we could also benefit from it.”

Steele’s information didn’t only flow in one direction. In January 2016, before the Fusion GPS dossier project kicked-into-high-gear, Johantan Winer and Strobe Talbott were sharing with Steele via Orbis’s Canada hosted servers and email system documents authored by Cody Shearer, who produced a “second Trump-Russia dossier.” This document consisted of two four-page reports, one was titled: “Donald Trump—Background Notes—The Compromised Candidate” and the second report was titled: “FSB Interview”.

The reports are almost identical in terms of content and layout to the Christopher Steele “Russian Dossier” but reference unnamed Turkish businessman with “excellent contacts within the FSB” as the source. The reports also echo the same salacious claims, along with the alleged corruption, and collusion.

Cody Shearer’s mysterious “one-eyed man from Istanbul” source claims that Trump was “filmed in Moscow in November 2013, during the Miss Universe pageant in the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel.” He also said that there was a copy of the video somewhere in Bulgaria but that he couldn’t get it.

Strobe Talbott is Cody Shearer’s brother in law, and was Cody’s brother Derek’s roommate in Yale. Talbott is a State Department Russian expert who served as Deputy Secretary of State in the Clinton Administration.

Talbott’s wife Brooke Shearer was Hillary Clinton’s personal aide and the lead investigator (nicknamed “The Dumpster Diver”) responsible for digging-up dirt on Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct accusers.

Strobe Talbott and his wife Brooke Shearer knew and worked with Mary Jacoby, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Neil King, and Shailagh Murray since the mid 1990s. Talbott has known Steele since at least 2006.

1) Question One: So who really wrote the Salacious Trump Dossier?

2) Question Two: And who researched and wrote the core parts of the dossier?

1&2) Answer for both questions One & Two, is this: Ex President Obama.

Obama and his hand selected circle of crooks. April 10th of 2016 is the date stamped upon his infamous Presidency as the lowest point, because upon that day he decided to author this debauchery against our Constitution, and the debasement of America.

Barack — I am not a crook — Hussein — my administration is scandal free — Obama. Yet on April 10th of 2016, it was proven that Obama was a hundred times worse than Tricky Dick — Richard Nixon.

Barack Hussein Obama is the lead author of this fake “Russian Dossier” and his handprint is everywhere on this hoax and upon the resulting witch-hunt, that has bedeviled us for more than two years already. April 10th of 2016 all the way to this day August 18th of 2018, and for God knows how much longer — we all suffer the repercussions of this broken person’s ill fated and evil designs.

And of course, when we get into the molecular structure of the “Russian Hoax Dossier” and we look at most of the textual evidence — indeed it points to Glenn Simpson, and his wife Mary Jacoby, as… the lead writers, since April 10th of 2016.

And this is the master-stroke of Barack Obama, because not only he bested Richard Nixon here at “Crookery” but because he also provided the broad strokes and the underlying tenets of the “faux claims” against Donald Trump at the extraordinary 14 hour meeting in the White House of April 10th of 2016.

And this proves that Barack Hussein Obama the 44th President of the United States is the “Chef” of this awfully smelling and terribly tasting pastiche of opposition research dossier — that is now called “Russian Dossier.”

It was Obama himself who also provided the content and the direction of the salacious claims of this nascent “Russian Dossier” against Donald Trump starting on April 10th of 2016. And in true propagandist form, like a good student of Saul Alinsky — Barack Obama demanded that the fake “Russian Dossier” will have to be written, compiled, legitimized and distributed properly.

Goody-two-shoe Barack Hussein Obama, asked for this propaganda to be “Done By The Book” in the 14 hour meeting of all the heads of this All Too American “Russian Dossier” hoax and related witch hunt — as he so memorably said back on April 10th of 2016.

As for the specific words contained within the text, these were actually written by the usual suspects that you’ll see unveiled here, one by one, uncovered from the research of the book SPyGate.

Yet as Obama said — to all the participants of the 14 hour White House meeting on April 10th of 2016 — for this Russia Hoax to succeed, and for this fake Russia story with Trump as the protagonist to be accepted as reality — the dissemination of the “Russian Dossier” would have to “be done by the book.” And even though all the principles knew that it was “Fake News” from the get-go, concocted on April 10th of 2016, this “Russian Dossier” had to be “sold” to the Security Agencies, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and the DIA, as Gospel Truth, as Gold, and as National Treasure, to boot.

And indeed we can now say with full confidence that we know the architects of the dossier framework quite well, because their signature is quite apparent, as is their participation in the 14 hour meeting inside the White house on April 10th of 2016. Yet we also know the low level mandarins who put “pen to paper” and “made up all this shite” in order to fool a nation, to usurp and weaponize their intelligence and security apparatus, and to allow the Coup D’Etat by the Deep State to go on.

That most of the textual evidence points to Glenn Simpson and his wife Mary Jacoby, can also be gleaned from Jacoby’s June 24, 2017 Facebook posting (which was deleted promptly with most of her SM activity after the project derailed) where she brags about her husband’s leading role in its composition and vents her frustration about Christopher Steele monopolizing the limelight of the “Russian Dossier” and the Trump related revelations of Copromat.

Now, when it comes to the research, promotion, and distribution work, the linkage shows that a fair amount of ‘staging’ activity took place in both the US (in the pre dossier stages) and the UK and involved individuals such as, Stefan Halper, Jonathan Clarke, Richard Dearlove, Charles Crawford, Iain Lobban, and Alexander Downer.

It is also interesting that many of Robert Otto’s “Russia Workgroup” pen pals include the same Australian and UK diplomatic and IC actors that by July 2016 aggressively promote the dossier and vouch for its authenticity.

The same type of staging and delivery took place in the US through the State department sources like Robert Otto and the political and PR work of Alexandra Chalupa, Natalie Budaeva, and Ilya Zaslavskiy and their pro-Ukraine ‘Free Russia Foundation’ NGOs.
It is notable that a lot of this activity dates to first week of April-May 2016, almost 8 weeks before Steele’s official June 2016 contract with Fusion GPS.

This strongly suggests that there was a proto-dossier in place and that there was a wider coordinated effort between the US and UK teams with Orbis Business Intelligence likely acting as a front for Hakluyt & Co.

The existence of a proto-dossier that predates Steele’s work is further supported by an email written by Robert Otto to John Williams, the director of the Office of Analysis for Russia and Eurasia in the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research.

In this email titled “the fried document” and dated May 1, 2016, Otto comments on some of the building blocks of the future dossier including how effective or damaging various claims would be.

For example, on the subject of “Fridman” and “Alfa” (see Dossier page 25 report 112) he writes: … It’s not clear that Aven/Fridman’s investments in Ukraine are in line with Kremlin policy. Alfa is a bank; banks issue loans. So what’s the big deal with its loans to UVZ? It’s a loss making enterprise and Alfa has threatened bankruptcy proceedings over non-payment. I fail t see how that’s at the Kremlin request. …I know nothing about Karimova’s ties to Alfa. She has them to Usmanov. And it’s Usmanov and Shvidler (Abramovich) who allegedly bribed Shuvalov, not Alfa… …A search in Integrum on “magnitskiy” and “al’fa” gets five hits.

Not a one is about Alfa laundering Magnitskiy money, let alone a central role.
Why repeat something so easily checkable. Was it some sort of Alfa subsidiary? If so, name it. See above on Shuvalov – some of the money may have went through Alfa, but that’s not what went public. (tidbit: one of the folks exposing Shuvalov is Natalya Pelevin that same who shared Kasyanov’s bed and chatted about an anti-Navalnyy front) …A very serious allegation that requires investigation…We have former Alfa fellows working in the building.

Otto’s comment that “We have former Alfa fellows working in the building” also suggests that other active State Department Intelligence resources were privy to these conversations.

Ilya Zaslavskiy’s early 2016 activity in the UK also shows some of the Trump dossier themes such as the business relationship with the “Alfa-Bank” in several of his anti-Russian Oligarch campaigns.

Ohr’s and Baumgartner’s roles were likely to research specific Russian content and re-write the narrative in ‘Russian style’ in order to make it appear authentic.
The ‘hard’ intelligence probably came from British and Ukrainian sources who may have also provided some of the juicy gossip.

Nellie Ohr utilized DOJ and State Department documents that pertained to Russian organized crime, cybersecurity, corruption, and opportunistically incorporated them into the dossier briefs.

This careful mixture of partial truth and fiction explains all of the titbits of information in the report that are marginally plausible and give the dossier a first-person witness quality and a thin veneer of creditability.

Simpson alludes to this when he said in the testimony: We –you know, they [Steeles network of resources] identified -one memo identified a Russian guy who worked for an NGO called Rossotrudnichestvo, which is –you know, I didn’t know it at the time, but I was able to learn from looking at it that the FBI considers that to be a front for the SVR.

So, you know, either the people were extremely knowledgeable about a lot of obscure intelligence stuff or, you know, that what they were saying had some level of credibility.

When it comes to the bulk of the literary work, Simpson, Jacoby, Baumgartner and Ohr likely authored it and Steele—if he did any actual writing—just formatted the reports in order to tag them with his scent and make them look spyish by using terms like “Source X” and redacting some phrases.

Nellie Ohr’s, Shailagh Murray, and Mary Jacoby also played a secondary organizational role and acted as the liaisons between the Fusion GPS team, State Department, DOJ, and the White House, and possibly as a cut-outs to other agencies.

Anyone who has ever worked in intelligence knows that a good brief should answer the who, what, when, where, how, and why questions. Almost none of the allegations in the dossier offer hard corroboration. It is mostly based on generalizations, truisms, and a lot of materials that were circulating on the internet and Ukrainian circles since the mid 2000s.

The writers of the dossier anticipated this criticism and countered it by building-in plausible deniability for most of the allegations through statements like:
“but key witnesses silenced and evidence hard to obtain” or “all direct witnesses to this recently had been “silenced”…”

It seems that the real dossier story is not the scandalous insinuations that it makes, but rather it’s the funding sources, the teams that worked on it, and its compilation and distribution channels.

At peak capacity, the dossier team must have consisted of at least 25 individuals who worked on it for over 6-12 months.

Assuming a modest $200 per hour rate per person, some first/business class travel and accommodations, media, consulting, IT, and legal services, this project must have cost upwards of $5-10 million dollars. According to Simpson’s testimony and documents, Fusion GPS was only paid about a million dollars by the DNC and Clinton campaign, which begs the questions of what was Hakluyt’s cut and where did the rest of the money go?

Simpson and Steele did far more than simply conduct sordid opposition research for the Clinton campaign. By various machinations, they successfully reached the most influential people in UK and US politics, the media, and federal government agencies and shaped/influenced the narrative of the 2016 presidential elections.

There is little doubt that Simpson/Jacoby and their US political/media network and Steele with his enablers in Hakluyt, the British media, and the Foreign Office successfully waged a full-scale influence operation against the US and are continuing to do so even now.

Much has been said and written about Christopher Steele’s authorship of the notorious document that alleges Russia-Trump collusion. According to Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS (who plead the Fifth and only spoke through his lawyers), Steele was hired by them in June 2016 to gather information about “links between Russia and [then-presidential candidate] Donald Trump.”

Pursuant to that business arrangement, Steele prepared a series of reports styled as intelligence briefings, some of which were later compiled into a collection of documents and published by a number of media outlets and later become known as the “Trump dossier.”

On the face of the dossier, it appears that Steele gathered his data from multiple sources in Russia, former Soviet union (FSU) countries, and the US. He then edited the raw intelligence—which seems to be a combination of conversations and notes—organized it in a summarized brief format, and published/leaked it in parts or in its entirety on a spiralling schedule.

My initial impression reading the dossier was that the writing was sloppy and that it did not resemble an intelligence report. It exhibited multiple writing styles and writers, both English and non-English speakers, and it was assembled in haste. I also thought that in many ways, it paralleled the plot line of the Dreyfus Affair. As in the case of the “dossier” and the Bordereau from the Dreyfus case, the Trump dossier was presented as undeniable proof of collusion. Yet, it’s uncertain who composed it, how it was collected, or even if the document is genuine.

Just like its nineteen century French predecessor, the Trump dossier too had a powerful social and political impact in the US. Its content has dominated the news and has raised substantial questions about the rule of law, the political impartiality of senior federal career bureaucrats, and the true extent of the separation of powers in government.

Russia vs. Non-Russia issues on MSM such as CNN & MSNBC’s news coverage:

Considering all of the dossier’s unusual aspects, I decided to take a little time and do a deeper dive into its structure and content. In this post, I’ll demonstrate how by using readily available OSINT tools and techniques, video analytics, and writing style analysis, we can pinpoint the likely sources, methods, and the individuals involved in the creation and distribution of this document.

I would like to apologize for the lengthy and somewhat overwhelming amount of detail in this write-up. Contrary to common belief, the truth is rarely concise, pure, and never simple. As Proverbs 1:2-7 implies, the acquisition of knowledge and understanding does require an investment of time and effort. in the spirit of full disclosure, I was not paid to produce this research and I am not affiliated with democratic or republican circles. My objective in writing this posting was to provide the layman reader not otherwise versed in intelligence gathering and analysis techniques with basic facts and insight so that they can form their own educated opinions on the matter.

The Dossier Team:

Even after several testimonies and investigative reports, the composition of the dossier team is still shrouded in secrecy. When Glenn Simpson testified on November 8th and 14th in front of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, he was vague and evasive about the names of the people that worked on the document and just said that he hired Steele, who then: “Use[d] his old contacts and farmed out other research to native Russian speakers who made phone calls on his behalf“.

Two of these “native Russian speakers” were subsequently identified as Nellie Ohr and Edward Baumgartner. But even after this revelation, there are still many unanswered questions about this team.

For example, what was the organizational structure of their network? How and where was the raw intelligence collected, stored, and transmitted? Or, how was Steele, a private British national living in England able to so quickly and effectively reach top US politicians like McCain and Pelosi, publish through and get full backing from media outlets like Yahoo, NYT and WaPo, and gain access to senior officials at the State Department, the DOJ, and FBI?

Trump Dossier Network:

Glenn Simpson, Mary Jacoby, Peter Fritsch, Neil King, Tom Catan.

Simpson is the public face of Fusion GPS. He was the prime contact for Perkins-Coie, the US law firm that paid for the dossier on behalf of the DNC, the Clinton presidential campaign, and several other financers. Simpson controlled and managed dossier contractors like Nellie Ohr, Edward Baumgartner, Chris Steele, and Chris Burrows. From his own testimony we know that he was the “architect of the research” and the first contributor to it. He graduated from George Washington University in 1986 with a degree in journalism. From 1989-1994 he worked as a reporter for Roll Call, where he met his wife Mary Jacoby, and then later at The Wall Street Journal 1995-2009.

Simpson also held a number of consulting and freelance investigative positions including one in 2004 with the International Assessment and Strategy Center (IASC).

In 2010 Simpson, his wife Mary Jacoby, Peter Fritsch, and Benjamin Schmidt formed Bean LLC, and gave it the trade name Fusion GPS. Shortly afterwards, Neil King Jr. and Tom Catan joined the team.

According to the original Fusion GPS website (before its content was purged and replaced with a single generic paragraph): “Fusion GPS brings to your project years of experience in collecting and sifting open source and proprietary intelligence”. They also claimed to have a “global network of contacts and a proven record for accuracy and professionalism and having a “high-level relationships in government and the media, legal, and policy communities”.

The statement about having a “global network” of resources and “high-level relationships in government” is interesting because Chris Steele makes this identical claim about his own company Orbis. Fusion GPS also prided itself on its team of experts that had special depth in matters of financial fraud and complex due diligence. Their value proposition was described as: “Our work begins where routine surveys of public information leave off: we explore sources others overlook, as well as the complex human and cultural relationships crucial to investment decisions and performance”.

The Fusion GPS mission statement:
“Based in Washington, DC, Fusion also stands at the crossroads of the regulatory, policymaking and enforcement communities increasingly important to the sound allocation of capital. We know the people on the front lines of issues related to trade, technology, natural resources and security. Our specialists can provide support in matters of regulatory compliance, asset recovery and market intelligence. We have the ability to present information in powerful products written by a team of specialists trained in producing material for some of the most discerning readers in the world, including the President of the United States and the readers of The Wall Street Journal.”

It is clear from Fusion GPS’s own materials that in 2011 and onwards that the company was already producing “products” in the form of commercial, financial, and political reports that were reaching the Oval Office and were being read by the president himself.

By 2015, Fusion GPS had offices in Washington D.C., LA, and London, with a headcount in excess of 22 individuals that included:
1. Glenn Simpson
2. Mary Jacoby
3. Peter Fritsch
4. Tom Catan
5. Jason Felch
6. Neil King Jr.
7. David Michaels
8. Taylor Sears
9. Patrick Corcoran
10. Laura Sego
11. Jay Bagwell
12. Erica Castro
13. Jason Raymond
14. Benjamin Schmidt
15. Joshua Levy
16. Jackie Flores
17. David Ford
18. Jason Schwartz

The political makeup of the team was exclusively Democrat with many of the employees and interns having a strong political connection to the Clinton and Obama administrations.

Jason Raymond, the Research Director, came from John Kerry’s press office and was affiliated with USAID; Laura Seago, a senior analyst, came from the Brennan Center for Justice and was also affiliated with USAID. It’s also noteworthy that the senior management had a documented history of misconduct and ethical-related issues.

Glenn Simpson has a Profane Cursing and Public Intoxication conviction; Jason Felch, a former reporter and the managing partner of the LA office, was fired from the LA Times for deceitful reporting. He was also cheating on his wife on multiple occasions with his Occidental College investigative source. Tom Catan, his wife Begoña Segurola, and Peter Fritch were involved in vicious attacks and a character assassination campaign against a fellow reporter.

Jason Felch, the Fusion GPS’ LA office Managing Partner, and his routing data to one of his Occidental College escapades with the School’s sexual misconduct administrator, Christopher David Steele, and Orbis Business Intelligence…

Christopher Steele:
Steele is ‘officially’ the primary author of the dossier and a second contributor after Simpson. He graduated from Cambridge University in 1986 with a degree in Social and Political Sciences. While at college, he wrote for the student newspaper Varsity.
Steele was recruited by MI6 directly following his graduation. From 1987 to 1989, he worked in London at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), then from 1990 to 1993, at the UK Embassy in Moscow.
Steele returned to London in 1993, and was posted to Paris in 1998. In 1999, his cover was blown when a media leak disclosed the identity of 116, MI6 agents.
In 2009, Steele and his fellow MI6-retiree Chris Burrows and Nicholas Butcher founded the private intelligence agency HL3299 Limited, later renamed Orbis Business Intelligence. In 2014, Steele and Burrows registered Walsingham Training, with Orbis being the majority controller.
In 2017, Steele and Burrows formed the holding company Chawton Holdings Limited and renamed “Walsingham Training” to “Walsingham Training Limited”, then renamed it again to “Walsingham Partners Limited”. The majority control of the company was then switched to Chawton Holdings.

According to the Orbis website, the company draws on extensive experience at the boardroom level, in government, multilateral diplomacy, and international business to develop bespoke solutions for clients. In 2011 before the dossier affair blow up, they were also promoting their surveillance, psychological warfare expertise, and influence operations capabilities which included services such as:
• Creating public opinion groundswells
• Delivering targeted political media campaigns

Just like in the case of Fusion GPS, Orbis also claims to have a “global network of senior associates which is made up of regional, industry and academic experts, as well as prominent government and business figures, their expertise and a closed network of contacts worldwide”.

The Orbis mission statement is:
“Our core strength is our ability to meld a high–level source network with a sophisticated investigative capability. We provide strategic advice, mount intelligence–gathering operations and conduct complex, often cross–border investigations.”

Unlike Orbis’ business pitch, Walsingham Training professed to deliver full logistic and tactical intelligence agency services, as their Mission statement describes:
“It’s a hostile world out there. Whether ‘out there’ is in the back streets of Kinshasa or negotiating around a table in New York, we understand this all too well. The same skills apply whether you are penetrating terrorist networks, winning over African warlords, or making nuanced corporate decisions in London or in frontier markets: you have to build a team you can trust, equip and then motivate to deliver. Fortunately, these skills can be learnt and honed so that they become second nature.”

Walsingham Training delivers bespoke training programs for our clients based off our proprietary modules:
• Targeting and crafting approaches to investors or potential clients using intelligence to spot opportunities, vulnerabilities and access points.
• Instrumentality persuading people using a diplomatic and psychological skill set is an essential part of manipulating personal encounters to your own advantage.
• Deployment High pressure, high stakes decision-making in complex environments like Russia and China as demonstrated by former senior diplomats.
• Tradecraft Understanding and mitigating the cyber and physical risk posed by hostile states, criminals and companies.
• Taking risks Identifying, quantifying and managing risks in developed and frontier markets to stay ahead of the competition compliantly.

Orbis and Walsingham have an interesting association with a number of companies such as: PS21, the SETA Foundation, and Grace Electronics Limited. Grace Electronics for example, is a 40 year old PC and laptop distributer.

Nellie Hauke Ohr: Nellie Ohr was the third contributor to the dossier. She earned a degree in history and Russian literature from Harvard-Radcliff 1982–1983 and MA and PhD in history from Stanford 1986-1990.

After graduation she worked for:
• Accenture iDefense (acquired from VeriSign) – Principal Mar 2017
• VeriSign iDefense – Cyber Threat Intelligence Researcher Dec 2016 – Feb 2017
• Fusion GPS – Analyst content Creator Mar 2016 – Dec 2016
• Miklos Systems – Senior Analyst Mar 2015 – Dec 2015
• Plessas Experts Network – Analyst content Creator Oct 2013 – Jan 2015
• Open-Source-Works – Senior Analyst Sep 2008 – Sep 2014
• MITRE Corporation – Linguist analyst Jan 2000 – Dec 2008
• Vassar College – Assistant Professor, History Department Jan 1990 – Dec 1998

She spent some time in Russia during the 1990s and according to at least one source, had powerful political connections there. In her book Adventures in Russian Historical Research, Cathy Frierson writes: “Nellie encouraged me to call the Smolensk archive [the home of Russia’s historical state secrets] director, assuring me that he would welcome me.”

Edward Emil Baumgartner:
Baumgartner was the forth contributor to the dossier. He is a British/French national. He earned his BA in history from Vassar College in 1995 and an MA in Russian, Eastern European, and Central Asian Studies from Harvard in 2000.
Baumgartner specializes in the Former Soviet Union (FSU). He started as an independent consultant in the FSU focusing on research and business intelligence. From 2002 to 2005, he was a Russia consultant at a London-based public relations company. His clients included Russian and Ukrainian government-owned and private organizations.
In 2008, Baumgartner founded the UK based political consultancy Baumgartner Limited. In 2010, together with Peat Austin Alexander, he co-founded the UK-based intelligence consulting firm Edward Austin.

The firm’s mission statement: “With an established network spanning the FSU and beyond, Edward Austin serves clients in the private and public sectors worldwide. We are pan-FSU. Alongside extensive work in Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine – the region’s three main economies – we have completed numerous projects on the ground in the wider Central Asia region (Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan), the Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia), the Baltics (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Belarus and Moldova. Reinforcing this is a global network of trusted partners, enabling us to undertake work across jurisdictions worldwide.”

The Dossier Network:
The network graph analysis indicates that the fellowship of the dossier is a close-knit group; everyone knew each other long before embarking on the quest to find the alleged Russian collusion. All of the project key players are related through marriage, family relations, or work affiliations. As can be seen in images 9-10, this team collaborated in various member configurations on many other ‘dossier projects’ and utilized the same collection methods, materials, resources, political network, and publication channels. Some of these affiliations go back more than 30 years.

These relationships between the team members transcended their changing places of employment and job titles. The following is a short sampling of the dossier network linkage results:

Christopher Steele knew Sir Andrew Wood from his days at the UK Diplomatic Service since 1986. In 2013, Wood had a paid consulting gig with Orbis. Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6 who promoted the Dossier in UK, Australian, Canadian, and US government circles was Steele’s boss in MI6. Steele knew and worked with Paoblo Miller in MI6 since 1994 and Luke Harding from The Guardian since 1996; Harding and Miller were also Orbis and Hakluyt contractors since 2009.

Steele and Chris Burrows worked with Stefan Halper as early as 2005. Steele knew Jonathan Clarke from his days in MI6 and communicated and met him in the US.

Burrows knew and communicated with Joseph Mifsud since 2010. Edward Baumgartner had been contracting with Orbis and Hakluyt since 2011.

Steel and Burrows knew and worked with Nigel Inkster from MI6 for over twenty years. They continued to work with him when he joined IISS and PS21. Inkster was also Sir Richard Dearlove’s deputy in SIS.

Orbis hired US nationals that previously held US government positions. For example, Tatianna Duran, an Orbis Senior Intelligence Analyst, previously worked for the US State Department and had a US government “Secret” security clearance. Tatianna Duran and Nigal Inkster worked together at PS21 and with Ilya Zaslavskiy at the Chatham House.

An example of Tatianna Duran, one of the Orbis employees, and her linkages using FR and keyword searches such as: “Orbis”, “PS21”, and “Chatham House”

Chris Burrows exchanged dossier related emails with Nicholas Fishwick, the former director of PGI and an MI6 officer, and with Stefan Halper who consulted for Hakluyt, a private UK intelligence firm similar to Fusion GPS and Orbis Business Intelligence.

Steele and Burrows had a long term working relationship with several other semi-active British foreign office individuals like, Charles Crawford, a former UK ambassador to South Africa, who was stationed with Steele in Moscow in 1993 and Raymond Asquith, a former British diplomat to Russia in 2009.

Steele’s and Burrows’s professional network and email communications also include multiple active and retired British intelligence officers like Claire Smith, a member of the UK Joint Intelligence Committee who Steele knew from their joint work in Afghanistan. Steele met with Sir Richard Dearlove in person and communicated with him via email and text messaging in March 2016 and onwards regarding the dossier.

Halper, Clarke, Downer, Smith, Dearlove, Crawford, Lobban, MI6, LAD, and Hakluyt Linkage: Steele worked with the FBI as early as 2010 on the FIFA investigation. In 2016, he met them several times including at two meetings with agent Michael Gaeta, a leading FBI ‘Russia corruption expert’, in Rome and in London to discuss the dossier.

Gaeta coordinated and got clearance for these meetings from Victoria Nuland at the State Department. Gaeta was the FBI case officer in Europe and controlled Orbis, Stefan Halper, and the Hakluyt dossier assets.

Michael Gaeta Linkage to US embassy in Rome and dossier related activity: Agent Michael Gaeta’s Biography: Michael Gaeta began his FBI career in 1996 in the New York Field Office where he investigated and supervised La Cosa Nostra organized crime cases for thirteen years. In 2009, Mr. Gaeta became the supervisory special agent for the Eurasian Organized Crime squad.

Under his direction, the Eurasian Organized Crime squad aggressively addressed the Eurasian Organized Crime threat and engaged with domestic and international law enforcement partners to advance cases and develop and share intelligence.

The squad had scores of successful indictments in high profile cases that indicted fraud amounts over $400 million (USD) and indicted laundered amounts over $200 million (USD) during his tenure.

Mr. Gaeta joined the FBI’s Legal Attaché Office in Rome as the Assistant Legal Attaché in May 2014. Prior to working for the FBI, Mr. Gaeta practiced law in New York City.

Harvard Alumni: Baumgartner, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, and David Kramer are all Harvard alumni. Nellie Ohr knew Stefan Halper since at least 2000. Nellie Ohr also worked in the MITRE Corporation with Halper’s son Marin Halper for six years from 2002-2008.

Peter Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, and Baumgartner all attended Vassar College. Nellie Ohr and Baumgartner were together at the History department at Vassar between 1991-1995, where Baumgartner was her student.

Between 2008-2014, Ohr worked for Open Source Works and Plessas Experts Network, a company specializing in OSINT. The company had a contract to provide OSINT development and training for the US Intelligence community (IC).

Both, Nellie and Kirby Plessas, the owner of the company knew each other since at least 2008. Both also communicated with each other and with Dale Walter, the director of Open Source Works using email accounts on email system.

Nellie Ohr, Kirby Plessas, Plessas Experts Network, and Open Source Works linkages: Tom Catan, knew and worked with Steele, Harding, Burrows, and Baumgartner since 2011.

Catan’s wife Begoña Segurola and Fritch’s former wife Beatriz “Bea” Hidalgo are from Spain/Mexico and the two families have known each other for over 30 years.

Glenn Simpson and his wife Mary Jacoby knew Bruce and Nellie Ohr from their days at the International Assessment and Strategy Center as early as 2004. Simpson and Jacoby knew and worked with Stefan Halper at the WSJ since 1996. They also knew Steele from their days at the WSJ going back to 2009.

Glenn Simpson’s wife, Mary Jacoby, founded Main Justice in 2009, a company specializing in paid corruption research and reporting. She has been the Chief Executive at Fusion GPS since 2010.

Jacoby also worked as a reporter for organizations such as GIR, and Law Business Research (which purchased Main Justice in 2015). While at Main Justice, she worked with Bruce Ohr and in fact nominated his FIFA investigation for the GIR Anti-Corruption award.

As can be gleaned from Main Justice’s mission statement below, Mary and her merry band of for rent corruption fighters were assembling and selling opposition research and dossiers as early as 2009:
“Main Justice and our subscription-only site, Just Anti-Corruption, services top law firms and corporate counsel, business leaders of Fortune 500 companies, U.S. Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. It offers on-demand research tools, published analysis from leading practitioners, access to a preparatory searchable FCPA (The Foreign Corrupt Practice) database with links to public documents and associated news stories. We also provide profile guides, high powered VIP networking events, and the highest insight and intelligence reports.”

While working in Main Justice, GIR, Law Business Research, and the WSJ, Jacoby cultivated a large network of key Federal (FBI, SEC, and DOJ) executives that included notables such as Adam Hickey, the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for National Security at the DOJ who was familiar with the dossier and the FISA application and Andrew Weissmann, the Chief of the DOJ’s criminal fraud section, who is now working for Robert Mueller the Special Counsel investigating the alleged Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election.

Adam Hickey and Andrew Weissmann presenting in one of several GIR events
Jacoby also facilitated special recognition awards for ‘strategically’ placed attorneys such as Leila Babaeva, a Russian speaking attorney who is now working at the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act unit at the DOJ and Kathryn Cameron Atkinson.

Mary Jacoby, Leila Babaeva, and Kathryn Cameron Atkinson at the 2015 GIR Awards
Jacoby knew and worked with Christopher Steele, Nellie Ohr, Peter Strzok and his wife Melissa Hodgman—the Associate Director in SEC Enforcement Division, Peter Fritsch, Neil King Jr. and his wife Shailagh Murray, David Kramer, Jonathan Winer, and Sidney Blumenthal who worked with her at Salon in 2004.

Sidney Blumenthal:

Sidney Blumenthal’s network is noteworthy because his email address book contains many of the dossier characters including Jacoby, Simpson, Winer, and others. It also contains most of the journalist involved in the ‘favorable’ dossier coverage. For example his friendly reporter count includes:

# News Outlet Number of reporters Blumenthal communicated with
1 The Guardian 49
2 New Yorker 16
3 New York Times 50
4 Washington Post 60

A sampling of Blumenthal’s first 20 contacts (out of over 4000) shows an over 96% linkage to anti-Trump publications, most of these are from mainstream media sources.

# Name Articles
1 Abbe Lowell Legal precedent clears Clinton
2 Adam Goodheart Regime Change in Charlottesville
3 Adam Gopnik Trump’s Radical Anti-Americanism
4 Al From The New Democrats and the Return to Power
5 Al Gore I tried my best, but Trump can’t be educated
6 Alan Rusbridger Trump has gone totally off the rails
7 Alex Gibney Every business Trump touched withered and died
8 Alex Goldfarb How Russia Helped Trump Win
9 Anatol Lieven Why Trump Is Right on Russia
10 Andrew Shapiro Thank you Hillary!
11 Andrew Terrill No to America First
12 Ann Pincus Donald Trump, propagandist-in-chief?
13 Anna Stein Lure of Greatness
14 Anthony Barnett Open Democracy
15 Anthony Weiner Trump “F*ckface Von Clownstick
16 Arianna Huffington Wake Up Call To The Establishment
17 Arnaud de Borchgrave Washington Times – The Trump Archives
18 Art Levine Impossible to believe that Donald Trump can win
19 Arturo Valenzuela Meet the Obama Holdovers
20 Aviva Kempner Antidote to Donald Trump
21 Becky Gardner Protest planned for Donald Trump’s visit to London

On April 19, 2016, two months before the content of the dossier was leaked to the media, Jacoby spent a few hours in the White House in the company of the following five seemingly unrelated individuals:

# Name Vocation Relevant Relatives
1 Scott C. Auerbach Attorney Wife – Former Miami New Times Editor
2 Ian G. Bregg Researcher Wife – An Attorney
3 Amy L. Bower Attorney-DHS Husband – An Attorney
4 Mary C. Jacoby Reporter Husband – Co founder of Fusion GPS
5 Laura K. Kwedar (Minch) Researcher Husband – An Attorney with Koch Institute
6 Eileen T. Zamkov

A second degree linkage analysis revealed that despite what appears to be a random group of tourists, these six individuals were in fact related to the dossier team through:
• Involvement in the Clinton Campaign
• Direct contact with the core and auxiliary Fusion GPS team via email communications
• Work at the State Department
• Participation in news production and reporting
• Had HLS and government legal services positions

It is noteworthy that all of the six members of this group’s home and office address are clustered within 4 miles of each other, (see below), and that most attempted to scrub (not always successfully) their online presence and 2016 SM activity. Another interesting observation is that in two cases, it is the spouse of the individual on the list that was the link to the dossier team.

Targeting Manafort Over Ukraine

In 2007, Simpson and his wife, Jacoby, authored an article entitled: “How Lobbyists Help Ex-Soviets Woo Washington”. This mercenary form of journalism promoted the specific political interests of one Ukrainian faction and alleged that prominent Republican politicians provided US business access to Kremlin-affiliated oligarchs and other friends of Putin. One such friend was Viktor Yanukovich who become president of Ukraine in 2010. According to the article, Yanukovich’s facilitator in the US was Paul Manafort.

Manafort figures prominently throughout the article and later in the dossier.

Keeping in mind Simpson’s and Jacoby’s paid interest in Manafort and Yanukovich, it is important to note that Rinat Akhmetshin, the alleged facilitator of the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya, is married to Lyudmila Vereshchagina—a Ukrainian national with ties to FISU who has been living in the US since 2008. Both Akhmetshin and Vereshchagina knew and communicated with Simpson, Jacoby, and Alexandra Chalupa (the junkyard dog of the DNC) and were involved in the organization of anti-Putin/Yanukovich/Trump activity across the US.

Rinat Akhmetshin’s lawyer/partner was Edward Lieberman, who concurrently worked for the Albright Stonebridge Group and used the email account. The Albright Stonebridge Group is a “Commercial Diplomacy” firm in Washington DC that is heavily involved with Ukrainian politics and lobbying activity in the US.

Evelyn Lieberman

Even more noteworthy, is Edward Lieberman’s wife, Evelyn Lieberman’s senior affiliation with the Clintons, Madeleine Albright and Joseph Biden. The following short bio illustrates her political R&R from 1988-2015.

Evelyn Lieberman’s Political Bio
2002–2015: Director of communications and external affairs, Smithsonian Institution
1999–2001: Under secretary for public diplomacy and public affairs, for Madeleine Albright

1997–1999: Director of Voice of America
1996–1997: White House deputy chief of staff and assistant Bill Clinton
1994–1996: White House deputy press secretary for operations Bill Clinton
1993–1994: Assistant to the chief of staff in the Office of Hillary Clinton
1988–1993: (5 years) Press secretary for Senator Joseph Biden

Rinat Akhmetshin’s spouse, Vereshchagina, was part of Natalie Budaeva Arno’s and Alexandra Chalupa’s social and professional network (Natalia Budaeva Arno surveilled Veselnitskaya while she was in the US in 2016). All three were also posting a large volume of anti-Trump and Russia collusion content as early as July 2016.

Robert Otto

Additionally, Robert Otto was sending and receiving updates from multiple sources such as, Nellie Ohr, David Kramer, Kyle Wilsonb, Andrew Wood, Richard Dearlove, and Michael Weiss, a CNN Investigative reporter for International Affairs, who was tracking and reporting on Veselnitskaya social media activity.

Jonathan Winer from the State Department knew Steele from mid-2000s. Winer also knew and worked with Glenn Simpson and Douglas Farah, his partner at IASC in 2004. Winer and Farah even cross endorsed each other on their LinkedIn profiles.

Jonathan Winer , Glenn Simpson and Douglas Farah linkage

Nellie Ohr, Peter Fritsch, and Jonathan Clarke knew each other from the Wilson Center.
Neil King Jr. from Fusion GPS is married to Shailagh Murray who was President Obama’s Senior Policy Advisor. She was also Joe Biden’s Deputy-Chief-of-Staff. King and Murray knew Steele, Kramer, Winer, and the Ohrs going back to the mid-2000s.

In 2010, several of the members of the future dossier team participated in a workshop dedicated to “Racketeering in Russia”.

The event was hosted by the National Institute of Justice and featured among others:
Glenn Simpson – Senior Fellow International Assessment and Strategy Center
Nellie Ohr – Researcher Open Source Works
Bruce Ohr – Chief Organized Crime and Racketeering Section Criminal Division DOJ
Lisa Holtyn – Intelligence Advisor Organized Crime and Racketeering (who hosted Bruce Ohr multiple times at the White House)

In 2012, Steele did some work for the US state Department and was in communication with Winer and the Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. This was done directly and through Sir Andrew Wood, who was the former British Ambassador to Russia and an employee of Orbis.

Steele’s communications included over 100 reports on the Ukraine-Russia conflict. These reports were based on information from UK and Ukrainian government sources and contained political and financial data about Russian companies that was shared with Bruce Ohr at the DOJ.

Victoria Nuland:
When questioned about Steele’s relationship with Jonathan Winer, Victoria Nuland said:
“During the Ukraine crisis in 2014-15, Chris Steele had a number of commercial clients who were asking him for reports on what was going on in Russia, what was going on in Ukraine, what was going on between them. Chris had a friend [Jonathan Winer] at the State Department and he offered us that reporting free so that we could also benefit from it.”

In June 2018, Nuland also confirmed that Steele was invited to the State Department on October 2016 (just two weeks before the elections) to give a dossier briefing. The meeting lasted over 3 hours, and included a presentation, handouts, a Q&A, and representatives form several federal agencies.

Steele’s information didn’t only flow in one direction.

In January 2016, before the Fusion GPS dossier project kicked-into-gear, Johantan Winer and Strobe Talbott were sharing with Steele via Orbis’s Canada hosted servers and email system documents authored by Cody Shearer, who produced a ‘second Trump-Russia dossier’.

This document consisted of two four-page reports, one titled “Donald Trump—Background Notes—The Compromised Candidate,” the second “FSB Interview”.

The reports are almost identical in terms of content and layout to the Steele dossier but references unnamed Turkish businessman with “excellent contacts within the FSB” as the source.

The reports echo the same salacious claims and alleged corruption and collusion. Cody Shearer’s mysterious ‘one-eyed man from Istanbul’ source claims that Trump was “filmed in Moscow in November 2013, during the Miss Universe pageant in the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel”. He also said that there was a copy of the video somewhere in Bulgaria but that he couldn’t get it.

Strobe Talbott is Cody Shearer’s brother in law and was Cody’s brother Derek’s roommate in Yale. Talbott is a State Department Russian expert who served as Deputy Secretary of State in the Clinton Administration. Talbott’s wife Brooke Shearer was Hillary Clinton’s personal aide and the lead investigator (nicknamed “The Dumpster Diver”) responsible for digging-up dirt on Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct accusers. Strobe Talbott and his wife Brooke Shearer knew and worked with Mary Jacoby, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Neil King, and Shailagh Murray since the mid 1990s. Talbott know Steele since at least 2006.

Nellie Ohr’s relationship with Steele goes back to the early-2000s or even earlier. Bruce Ohr’s relationship with Steele began long before Trump’s presidential bid. It goes back to Steele’s 2009 FIFA corruption investigation. Bruce was then chief of the Organized Crime and Racketeering section in the DOJ which had a keen interest in the early stages of the case.

Nellie Ohr’s maintained active communications channels with a number of diplomatic, State Department, and IC members prior, during, and after the dossier publication this included the likes of Robert Otto, Chris Brot, Nathaniel Reynolds, and Donald Jensen.

Robert Otto, who worked for Victoria Nuland’s at the State Department (resigned in December 31, 2016) frequently communicated via a number off private aliased emails dossier and Russia collusion and anti-Trump content with his “Russian Workgroup” that among others included David Kramer, Andrew Wood, and a long list of current and former US, British, and Australian Intelligence professionals such as:

Name – Email Address – Organization – Job Description:
Glenn Howard Jamestown Foundation – President
John Dunlop Hoover Institute – Senior Fellow
Walter Zaryckyj Center for US Ukrainian Relations – Committee
Columbia University – Senior Russia researcher
Mira Kyzyk (Chalupa’s Friend) Ukrainians for Obama and Biden
Fordham University – Program Manager
Kyle Wilson Australian ONA Intelligence – Senior Russia Analyst
David Wall Australian ONA Intelligence – Senior Russia Analyst
Lilia Shevtsova Chatham House – Fellow Russia and Eurasia
Andrew Wood Chatham House – Fellow Russia and Eurasia
James Nixey Chatham House – Head of Russia and Eurasia
Cooper Julian Chatham House – Fellow Russia and Eurasia
Richard Connolly Chatham House – Fellow Russia and Eurasia
Phil Hanson Chatham House – Fellow Russia and Eurasia
Roderic Lyne Chatham House – Vice Chairman UK ambassador to Russia
Bobo Lo Chatham House – Fellow Russia and Eurasia
Deputy head of mission Australian Embassy Russia
John Gerson Foreign & Commonwealth Service – MI6 Officer
Ian Bond Foreign & Commonwealth Service – MI6 Officer
Alan Parfitt Foreign & Commonwealth Service Officer
Elizabeth Teague Foreign & Commonwealth Service Office
Jamestown Foundation
David Riley Foreign & Commonwealth Service Office British Embassy, Washington DC-Head of the Russia Team
Celeste Wallander White House – Senior Advisor to Obama
Charles Kupchan White House – Senior Advisor to Obama
Margaret Henoch Former IC Operations manager
US News and WaPo News Contributor
Jeffrey Edmonds Former IC – Senior Russia Analyst
Chris Brot Chris Brot Former IC – Senior Russia Analyst
Paul Goble Former IC/State Department – Senior Russia Analyst The Institute of World Politics – Faculty
Brannon’s Friend IC Undergraduate Scholar program
Donald Jensen State Department – Former Ambassador
Nathaniel Reynolds National Intelligence – Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Russia and Eurasia
Julia Gurganus National Intelligence – Director’s Office – Senior Russia expert
Robert Otto State Department – Russia intelligence expert
Peter Andreoli State Department – Senior Political Officer
Daniel Russell State Department – Deputy Assistant Secretary
Russia Business Council – President
Nicholas Berliner State Department – Foreign Service Officer
Alexander Tratensek State Department – Foreign Service Officer
Kathleen Kavalec State Department – Deputy Assistant Secretary Bureau of European Affairs
Eugene Fishel State Department – Chief, Bureau Intelligence and Research
Rose Gottemoeller State Department – Under Secretary of State International Security Affairs
Eric Green State Department – Director Office of Russian Affairs
Alexander Kasanof State Department – Director Office of Eastern Europe
Kelly Kivler State Department – Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Russia
Rory MacFarquhar National Security Council – Special Assistant to Obama. Director at Google
Mark Medish State Department – The Messina Group – President
CEO is Obama’s former campaign manager
James O’Brien State Department – Special Presidential Envoy
Albright Stonebridge Group – Vice Chair
Mary Warlick State Department – Ambassador and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
John Williams State Department – Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Andrew Weiss Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – VP
RAND Corporation – Director
Samuel Charap RAND Corporation – Senior Russia Analyst

Many of the correspondences are addressed to and from State Department and UK government emails and indicate that the content was written and read during business hours.

One example of these emails dates to April 29, 2016 (written 6 weeks before Steele was hired by Fusion GPS) and is titled, “Why Is Donald Trump a Patsy for Vladimir Putin?”

In this communication to David Kramer, the former Assistant Secretary of State and the Director at the McCain Institute, he wrote: “To the degree they have attacked him on foreign policy, Trump’s critics in both parties have mostly confined themselves to the themes that are digestible extensions of his personal style — he is ignorant, inconsistent, temperamentally unfit to lead, and a danger to blunder the country into war. All of those charges are true, yet they manage to deny something that, in a candidate without such flamboyant drawbacks, would itself be a campaign-threatening scandal: Trump is Vladimir Putin’s stooge.”

Several of Otto’s email correspondences also included Bruce Ohr and Nellie Ohr. From these emails, it’s evident that Bruce was co-sharing his wife’s AOL account. as the responses that Otto is getting back are tagged as both, “Bruce Ohr”, and “Nellie Ohr”.

So is it reasonable to assume that all of these incestuous relationships are coincidental? Ian Fleming, a naval intelligence officer and the creator of James Bond, contemplated the problem of coincidental relationships in intelligence operations and came up with the answer in his maxim: ”Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action.”

The House Intelligence Committee’s hearings on November 2017 attempted among other things to answer the dossier authorship question. Simpson testified that Steele used his old contacts and farmed out other research to native Russian speakers who made phone calls on his behalf. In the hearing transcripts, Simpson comes through as being evasive and ambiguous; he hemmed and hawed a lot and had problems remembering and recalling details. Despite his fogginess, however, he was crystal clear about Steele being the author of the documents.

From Simpson’s testimony, we also know that while contracting for Fusion GPS in mid-2016 Edward Baumgartner was working on these two projects:
• Magnisky Act – Russian government lobbying effort to overturn the Magnisky Act. This case revolved around one Sergei Magnitsky, a Russian tax accountant working for Hermitage Capital who allegedly outed some Russian officials for fraud. He was arrested and detained and died in prison in 2009. The Russian on the other hand, claim that he was targeted because of a $230 million dollar tax evasions involving Hermitage Capital and its CEO William Browder. The details of the case are unclear, but Interestingly, Robert Otto and a few of his “Russia Workgroup” colleagues believed that the story was William Browder’s PR stunt. Some of the evidence and testimonies in the case subsequently turned out to be substantially inaccurate.

In one example William Browder, the CEO of Hermitage Capital and the brain behind the Magnitsky act, stated in an interview on MSNBC on February 5, 2015 that “Eight riot guards with rubber batons beat him [Magnitsky] for an hour and 18 minutes until he died.” But the post mortem examination didn’t show any evidence of beating beyond rough handcuff bruising.

Browder also suspiciously communicated and coordinated his story with several officials at the State Department and House Foreign Affairs Committee including with one Kyle Parker who was using both, his “” and “” email addresses in these correspondences.

• Prevezon Money Laundering – Russian government lobbying effort to help Prevezon–a Russian government owned company Prevezon defend itself against a US government charge alleging a 230 million dollar money laundering scheme.

During the Prevezon and Magniseky contracts which ran through October 2016, Baumgartner was the lead writer and researcher working closely in Russia and Ukraine. In his testimony, Simpson identified Baumgartner as a contributor to the dossier:

Foster: And what type of work did Mr. Baumgartner undertake for Fusion?

Simpson: Discovery mostly, helping locate witnesses. He speaks Russian. So he would work with the lawyers on gathering Russian language documents, gathering Russian language media reports, talking to witnesses who speak Russian, that sort of thing. He may have dealt with the press. I just don’t remember.

Foster: So was Mr. Baumgartner also working on opposition research for Candidate Trump?

Simpson: At some point, I think probably after the end of the Prevezon case we asked him to help with I think — my specific recollection is he worked on specific issues involving Paul Manafort and Ukraine.

Somewhat surprising is Baumgartner’s denial of Simpson’s statement that he did work on the dossier. Specifically:

“I was helping them [Fusion GPS] on this other project, which was unrelated, and they mentioned it to me in July 2016, I was never made aware of Chris Steele’s work or the dossier, and it was kept that way deliberately. I would have had nothing to add, anyway. I produce memos based on information that is in the public record that can be given to the feds or shared with journalists.“

But then in a contradictory statement, Baumgartner said that he produced memos that could be given to the feds. We now know that the only memos given to the feds (DOJ and FBI) by Steele and Fusion GPS were the dossier documents.

The third contributor, Nellie Ohr, was another Russia intelligence analyst working for Fusion GPS and Steele. She has not been deposed nor has voluntarily offered any insight into her role in the writing process so it’s difficult to ascertain the exact part she played.

Not surprisingly, when questioned, Simpson didn’t mention her. However, from a recent House Intelligence Committee memo, it’s clear that Nellie Ohr was in fact “employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump”. The memo adds that Bruce Ohr “later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research”.

Asked by intelligence panel staff if he verified Steele’s “sources in Russia” or corroborated their information, Simpson said he’d never been to Russia himself and couldn’t “evaluate the credibility of someone on the other side of the [Atlantic]”, nor could he confirm that Steele actually spoke directly with any of his Russian sources.

Private companies like Orbis or Hakluyt (unless they are a front for SIS) lack the means to properly vet foreign intelligence sources let alone vet the source’s information. But that didn’t create any doubt in Simpson’s and Jacoby’s minds—both former investigative reporters for the WSJ. Simpsons said that he completely deferred to Steele’s expertise and did not question his findings because of his “sterling reputation”.

The sterling reputation the he and the FBI were referring to was Steele’s work on the FIFA corruption case. According to Steele, he provided investigative services and intelligence to the Interpol, DOJ, and FBI which resulted in the arrest and prosecution of a number of FIFA officials. The problem with this case’s sources and methods is the same as with the dossier initiative.

The whole FIFA case revolved around England’s hope to host either the 2018 or 2022 World Cup, but FIFA awarded those tournaments to Russia and Qatar. Steele was then ‘hired’ in 2009 by England’s Football Association to investigate allegations of corruption by FIFA. In 2015, the DOJ indicted a number FIFA affiliated individuals. Interestingly, the DOJ did not charge anyone at FIFA with bribery because US Federal bribery laws cover only payments to government officials. Bruce Ohr’s team, instead alleged racketeering, wire fraud, and money laundering conspiracies.

Steele didn’t perform any hands-on investigative work on the FIFA case himself. From the documentary evidence, a few of his contacts in MI5/MI6 shared with him some of the SIGINT, HUMINT, and FININT intercepts. He then repackaged the data and passed the file to the DOJ and FBI, all the while collecting a lot in service fees and building his credibility with them. The dossier initiative was also no altruistic act. Steele received over $270K for his report.

It is also interesting to note that the DOJ statement about Glenn Simpson “Never advising source #1 as to the motivation behind the research” is untrue. In his testimony in front of Senate Judiciary Committee on August 22, 2017, Simpson was very clear about having previous discussions and actively working with Steele to discredit Trump as early as 2009.

On pages 77-86 of his testimony he states: “…we’re friends [referring to Steele] and share interest in Russian kleptocracy and organized crime issues. I would say that’s broadly why I asked him to see what he could find out about Donald Trump’s business activities in Russia.
…it was opaque what Donald Trump had been doing on these business trips to Russia.

We didn’t know what he was doing there. So, I gave Chris — we gave Chris a sort of assignment that would be typical for us which was pretty open ended. We said see if you can find out what Donald Trump’s been doing on these trips to Russia. Since Chris and I worked together over the years there’s a lot that didn’t need to be said. That would include who is he [Trump] doing business with, which hotels does he like to stay at, you know, did anyone ever offer him anything, you know, the standard sort of things you would look at.”

The dossier is 35 pages long and has the following layout and structure
Section 1 – Company intelligence report number date/running total
Section 2 – Report subheading “Russia/USA Growing Backlash in Kremlin…”
Section 3 – Summary of report usually in bullet point format (the ‘raw intelligence’)
Section 4 – Detailed discussion of summary points with a citation of sources

The dossier reports are not sequential and are spaced unevenly. It is also unclear if the report numbering applies to the dossier or if it’s a running total of all the reports produced by Orbis for multiple customers in that time frame. As can be seen from the table below, the reports also have formatting problems and data entry errors (e.g. report 86 is dated 20-Jul-2015) which suggests some haste and carelessness in their preparation.

The reports production schedule and volume is also problematic. As can gleaned from the above frequency graph, the report numbers between Oct-16th to Dec-16th 2016 spike from 135 to 166. This is an anomaly (see red trend line spike) and could indicate that Steele is gaming the numbers.

Simpson pimped Steele as a real-life James Bond with deep connections inside the Kremlin and because of this, he didn’t have to corroborate any of his reports. But Steele—his previous contacts in Russia now long gone—had to rely on others like Ohr, Baumgartner, and Ukrainian sources to generate his so-called ‘raw intelligence’.
When Simpson was asked how Steele procured the intelligence he said: I don’t know. I think there’s been a little bit of confusion I would like to clear up. Some people were saying that he was paying people for information. I don’t know whether he does or not, but that’s not basically how I understand field operations to work. You commission people to gather information for you rather than sort of paying someone for a document or to sit for an interview or something like that. That’s not how I understand it works.

Considering the fact the Simpson paid Steele about $160K (according to Orbis’s income statement it was over $270K) for the information, it is a somewhat puzzling that he didn’t’ bother getting the specifics. But luckily for us, Steele was kind enough to share his methods with The New Yorker. It consisted of the following process:
Orbis employs dozens of confidential “collectors” around the world whom it pays as contractors. Some of these collectors are private investigators; others are investigative reporters or highly placed experts in strategic positions. Depending on the task and the length of project, the fee for a collector can be as high as two thousand dollars per day.

The collectors harvest intelligence from a larger network of unpaid sources, some of whom don’t even realize they are being treated as informants. These sources occasionally receive favours—such as help in getting their children into Western schools—but money doesn’t change hands because it could violate laws against bribing government officials or insider trading.

So in other words, Orbis has a “large network” of highly placed government informants in Russia, that don’t know that they are informants—and none of them gets paid for the classified information because that would violate European union bribery laws. So what is the incentive of all for these FSB, Kremlin, and Russian Foreign Ministry personnel to share state secrets with Steele?

This business model also raises some serious questions. Assuming that by “Western schools” Steele means Ivy League and not your average local community college and that his secret compensation formula is: ‘High value intelligence’ = ‘Getting the source’s child into a Western school’

Than how is Steele able to perform this magic with the university admissions office? Is it plausible that Orbis is bribing admission committee members in Cambridge University? And who pays for these students’ tuition, room, and board?

The cost of attending a school like Cambridge university for an international student is over $60k per year. How can an FSB source who draws a $10K per year salary possibly afford it? And what about the FSB’s counter intelligence team? Wouldn’t they have a few questions for their fellow employees regarding their children’s attendance at western Ivy League schools?

And if this is the model, is this how Ivanna Voronovych, Pelosi’s legislative aide got into a top US university?

According to the dossier, it is sourced from about 34 valuable, trusted, and highly placed assets such as:

1. A senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure
2. A former top Russian intelligence officer
3. Several knowledgeable FSB sources
4. A trusted compatriot (there are references to at least 5 of these)
5. A former top level Russian intelligence officer who is still active inside the Kremlin
6. A senior Russian financial official
7. A close associate of Trump
8. Source E (redacted)
9. A female staffer at the Ritz Carlton hotel
10. An ethnic Russian operative connected to the Ritz Carlton hotel
11. A senior Kremlin official
12. A Russian IT specialist with direct knowledge of FSB operations
13. A senior Russian government figure
14. An ethnic Russian who is a close associate of Trump
15. A separate source with direct knowledge of Trump’s investment in Russia
16. A Russian source close to Rosneft President
17. An official close to Presidential Administration Head Sergei Ivanov
18. A Kremlin official close to Sergei IVANOV
19. A trusted associate of a Russian émigré
20. Two well-placed and established Kremlin sources
21. A source close to premier Dmitriy Medvedev
22. A close colleague (of Steele)
23. A Kremlin official involved in US relations
24. A Kremlin insider
25. A Kremlin advisor
26. A well-placed Russian figure
27. An American political figure associated with TRUMP
28. A senior member of the Russian Presidential Administration (PA)
29. A senior Russian MFA official
30. Top level Russian official
31. Two knowledgeable St Petersburg sources
32. A senior Russian leadership figure
33. A Russian Foreign Ministry official
34. Igor Sechin’s close associate

If this list of assets is genuine and so is the chain of acquisition, then Steele somehow succeeded in building a collection network in Russia that rivals any national intelligence agency. This is a pretty impressive feat for someone who left Russia in 1993 and had his cover blown in 1999.

Finding one highly placed and reliable Russian source with access to such explosive materials would be considered the equivalent of winning a multi-million dollar lottery. To have thirty four such sources is virtually impossible.

Steele’s claims of access to top political and security resources in Russia also makes one wonder why would MI5 and MI6 tolerate a private firm like Orbis actively engaging in espionage against Russia from British soil. Is it plausible that the British security services just didn’t know that smack dab in the middle of London and just a skip and a jump 300 feet from Buckingham Palace, Dr. Evil and his mini-me’s were in a castle at Grosvenor Gardens and were remotely controlling legions of deep Russian assets and aggressively plotting against a US presidential candidate?

Simpson, Steele’s handler, was asked by Congressman Trey Gowdy during the House Intelligence Committee’s November 14 Hearing, (see excerpt below), if Steele had gone “to Russia as part of this project,” to which Simpson replied: “No, sir” at the time he compiled the dossier, Steele hadn’t been back to Russia in 17 years.

Gowdy then asked him:
Gowdy: “How was he able to accumulate information in Russia if he didn’t go?”

Simpson: “… and generally, you have a network of sources who live in or came from the place that you’re interested in. So, you know, generally speaking, you would have –you would run a network of sub-sources or subcontractors who travel around and gather information for you. And so without getting into who his sources are, I can say generally, he hires people who can travel and talk to people and find out what’s going on”.

On the possibility that he was just fed a steady diet of dezinformatsiya, according to Steele’s own words that was unlikely because: “Disinformation is an issue in my profession, it is a central concern, and we are trained to spot disinformation, and if I believed this [the dossier] was disinformation, or I had concerns about that, I would tell you [Fusion GPS] that. And I’m not telling you that. I’m telling you that I don’t believe this [the dossier] is disinformation.”

So what Steele is saying here is essentially: ‘I am a wise old British gentleman spy, I was trained at the Hogwarts School of spy Wizardry, and you can trust everything I’m telling you. Now, BEGONE!’

This is laughable! Vetting sources is a critical part of the evaluation and reliability of intelligence. It’s such an essential part of the craft that no decisions about the information can be made without it. Given the poor quality of his raw intelligence, Steele’s lack of concern for the possibility that he was being fed disinformation is alarming.

While still in the early stages of his clandestine dossier project, Steele and Fusion GPS launched a coordinated media blitz to publish the briefs. Steele was sharing the details with a handful of DOJ, FBI, State Department, and other political figures such as Kramer and his friend Winer, who even endorsed him on LinkedIn.

Steele and Simpson were also regularly briefing reporters from The New York Times, The Washington Post, Yahoo! News, MSNBC, The New Yorker, and CNN.

Many of the reports betray source information. For example:
“Speaking in July 2016, a Russian source close to Rosneft President confided the details of a recent secret meeting between him and…Carter PAGE”.

In March 2017, after Steele started getting negative media coverage, Orbis came out with the following media release: Orbis Business Intelligence has an established track record of providing strategic intelligence, forensic investigation and risk consulting services to a broad client base. The nature of our business, and our high standards of professionalism dictate that we would not disclose to the public information on any specific aspects of our work.
This is an almost identical copy of Hakluyt’s statement: We don’t ever talk about anything we do…

Reading this statement, it’s difficult to reconcile Steele’s professed discretion and the vow to “not disclose to the public information on any specific aspects of our work” with the fact that he is a serial leaker.

Even if we assume that Steele didn’t intentionally plan to burn his sources, leaking such details to the media shows total lack of craft.

In December 2016, when the story about the mysterious death of Oleg Erovinkin came out, Simpson attempted to leverage it to shut down questions about Steele’s sources and methods. He was hinting that Erovinkin, a former general in the FSB, was one of Steele’s deep sources. A number of other individuals within Steele’s and Fusion GPS’s circles were also aggressively promoting this narrative. In one example, Scott Dworkin, the head of DNC’s opposition research group the ‘Democratic Coalition’ tweeted:

In another example, Luke Harding, who worked for Orbis and was one of Steele’s collectors in Russia until he was expelled from there in 2011, in his book, Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win wrote:
“A person close to Steele admitted that in the wake of the dossier the Kremlin did appear to be wiping out some kind of American or Western espionage network.”
So in the unlikely case that the Russians were now eliminating Steele’s assets, then the death of these people can be blamed squarely on his ongoing whirlwind dossier media tour and his criminal negligence.

The report contains a number of errors and inaccuracies that should have been caught and corrected at the final copyedit before publication; after all, Simpson, Jacoby, Steele, Ohr, and Baumgartner earn their living writing. You would certainly expect that one of them would read and clean up the document before it was distributed.

The errors in the briefs include the consistent misspelling of names like the “Alfa Group” with “Alpha Group” which betrays the fact that the writer is not versed in the material he is writing about. This could alternatively be written off as gangsta Ali-G style spelling, but it’s odd that someone like Steele who was raised on the Queens’s English is going to adopt this style of writing in an official intelligence report. It may also be of some relevance that Dworkin uses the same Alpha/Alfa alternate spelling in his publications.
What Language was the Report Written in?

It’s clear from the grammar, punctuation, spelling, idioms, and sentence structure that the report is suffering from some serious English language deficiencies. It is filled with sentences like:
“Russians meanwhile keen to cool situation”, or “Educated US youth to be targeted as protest…”

Many dossier apologists point out that this is because the raw intelligence came from some ‘Vlad’ who ‘don’t speaka de English’. This is also one of the leading arguments in favor of the authenticity of the intelligence. After all, would you expect perfectly written British English prose from an FSB source? It’s hard to buy this argument. It has the hallmarks of a false flag operation written all over it. Steele doesn’t speak fluent Russian nor for that matter does he even read or write Russian. So, these notes could not have been the transcribed recordings or the transcripts of his conversations/communications with his sources.

According to Simpson, Steele: “… farmed out other research to native Russian speakers who made phone calls on his behalf“.

So he wasn’t personally conducting the debriefings of his assets; some other Russian speaker conducted the interviews and/or translated the written intel into English. The only other plausible members of the dossier team to be able to do this were Ohr and Baumgartner. Simpson confirmed that Baumgartner’s job for Fusion GPS was the translation of Russian language documents, writing reports, and interviewing assets who speak Russian.

He said: “So we retained Ed to—originally in the Prevezon case—to do some interviews in Moscow, I think, and retrieve some records from Russia. And other Russian language-related tasks.”

Baumgartner and Ohr are native English speakers with advanced degrees from Ivy League schools. So if they wrote down the bulk of the raw intelligence, then why did they dumb down their writing style and forget how to form proper English sentences? After all, Baumgartner prides himself on his flawless spoken Russian and touts his firm’s translation services: “Several blue-chip corporate names in the region retain Edward Austin to write, translate and edit their press releases, presentations and other corporate material.”

Ohr also practically lived in the Lenin Library and the Smolensk archive for almost a year reading and translating documents in Russian. She also made a name for herself as a book reviewer writing in perfect English.

Finally, assuming that the ‘raw intelligence’ came from some FSU sources, was it received in Ukrainian or Russian?

We can’t determine this with certainty because the translation into English destroyed the fine nuances of these two similar languages. Or perhaps, it was written in British English in the first place and then rewritten in a ‘Russian style’ to make it look more authentic?

It is interesting that the dossier contains a significant amount of non-political and business-related activity. There is also a generous amount of emphasis on cyber warfare and cyber crime. Neither of these subjects has much to do with the stated objectives of the original research of gathering information about “links between Russia and [then-presidential candidate] Donald Trump”.

Russian involvement in cyber-related crime is also old news. Russian, Ukrainian, and other FSU based botnets that distribute malware have been operating at full capacity since the mid-2000s. With some of the more significant players having quasi-government affiliations.

Why then the sudden increase in Russian cyber warfare related chatter in the dossier?

The reason could be that someone asked Steele to include this material in order to address the DNC internal email leak which was published in June-July 2016.

An illustration for this somewhat irrelevant cyber related material can be found in report 86 dated 26 July 2016. Under item 3 we find the following paragraph:

In terms of the FSB’s recruitment of capable cyber operatives to carry out its, ideally deniable, offensive cyber operations, a Russian IT specialist with direct knowledge reported in June 2016 that this was often done using coercion and blackmail. In terms of ‘foreign’ agents, the FSB was approaching US citizens of Russian (Jewish) origin on business trips to Russia. In one case a US citizen of Russian ethnicity had been visiting Moscow to attract investors in his new information technology program.

The FSB clearly knew this and had offered to provide seed capital to this person in return for them being able to access and modify his IP, with a view to targeting priority foreign targets by planting a Trojan virus in the software. The US visitor was told this was common practice. The FSB also had implied significant operational success as a result of installing cheap Russian IT games containing their own malware unwittingly by targets on their PCs and other platforms.

I don’t know what the term “IT Specialist” means in Steele’s world of rent-a-spy, but for most of us in the field it describes individuals who use their technical expertise to implement, monitor, or maintain IT systems. Even if this IT Specialist was working for the FSB, IT staff in any intelligence organization is usually not privy to case files and sources and methods used to recruit agents. It doesn’t take much imagination to cross-reference Steele’s fictitious “IT Specialist” to Snowden and his fantastic exploits. In fact, Snowden describes an almost identical story where allegedly coercion and blackmail were used to turn a Swiss banker into an informant.

As for the term “with direct knowledge”, does he mean that this IT Specialist claimed to have participated in one of these offensive cyber operations and willingly shared this information with one of Steele interviewers?

The same goes for the proposition that an “IT Specialist” would have firsthand knowledge of the FSB’s playbook for recruitment of US citizens of (Jewish) Russian origin. The whole premise that the FSB is targeting US Jews because they are greedy and would flip for a price sounds like it was taken from Borat in the nest of the Jews or the protocols. It reeks of institutionalized anti-Semitism which could have been planted in the report deliberately to generate reader outrage.

Further more, even from the point of view of original research, its obvious that this allegation didn’t come from one of Steele’s FSB sources. It can be traced directly to Glenn Simpson through his testimony during the House Intelligence Committee hearing, where he stated: [Simpson] “The Mossad, was my source for the belief that Russian intelligence has been operating through the Jewish Orthodox Chabad movement, and the Russian Orthodox Church. The Orthodox church is also an arm of the Russian State now… the Mossad guys used to tell me about how the Russians were laundering money through the Orthodox church in Israel, and that it was intelligence operations.”

This begs the obvious question of how did the subject of Simpson’s alleged conversations with the “Mossad guys” made it into Steele’s independent intelligence reports?

Steele also seems to be conflating multiple Russian intelligence services under the FSB. The FSB is the Russian equivalent of the FBI and is responsible for domestic security, they typically don’t recruit and mange foreign agents. The actual Russian intelligence agencies responsible for conducting wide scale foreign surveillance and cyber operations are the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) and the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU).

Another noteworthy observation is the general vagueness of the cyber section and the writer’s poor understanding of computer and software terminology in frequently confusing terms like IP (intellectual property) with a code base and Trojans with Viruses.
Besides, whoever wrote this section needs to make up his/her mind about which attack vector is it. A trojan? A virus? Or cheap Russian IT games (probably meant to say ‘IT Utilities’ like rogue anti-virus) infected with malware.

To illustrate the FSB’s ’recruitment’ method, Steele tells us about a US citizen who travels to Russia hoping to attract investors in his “information technology program”. What does that even mean?

Is he talking about an executive of a US startup that is looking for seed money in Russia?

If so, the proposition is ridiculous; anyone that has ever tried to raise capital in a startup knows that because of IP and regulatory constraints, the funding source is always country specific. Also, the idea that a US executive running a US-based software company would willingly allow the FSB to plant a virus in his software is laughable and shows a childish understanding of cyber warfare practices.

You don’t have to be a genius to know that when he is caught—the question is when, not if—the company would be destroyed and he would be looking at massive personal civil penalties and a very long jail sentence…not to mention the likelihood that as part of his plea bargain he would sing like a canary implicating the FSB in a crime.

In 2013, Bruce Ohr acting as the Assistant Deputy Director at DOJ participated in the third St. Petersburg International Legal Forum. He was a speaker at a session titled “Criminal Matters and Allegations of Crimes in International Arbitration”, a topic connected to the Magnitsky Act. It’s interesting that his lecture included many of the components of the yet-to-be dossier’s: “money laundering operations”, “payment of large bribes and kickbacks”, “forged documents”, and “collusive schemes”.

In 2016, after her position with Fusion GPS ended, Nellie Ohr landed a new gig with VeriSign iDefense as threat analyst in cybersecurity. In February 2017, VeriSign sold their iDefense business to Accenture. Ohr’s new title became Principal at Accenture Security. In this capacity, she delivered a presentation during the ISO-ISAC Fall 2017 session entitled: “Ties Between Government Intelligence Services and Cyber Criminals – Closer Than You Think?”

Ohr’s presentation focused on enforcement activity in 2016-2017 and provided examples of how cyber threat actors were arrested, indicted, or identified in intelligence reports by US and European governments.

She pointed out connections and ties between government intelligence services (such as the FSB) and cybercrime actors. She discussed the drivers and mechanisms between state and criminal cooperation and offered a case study that explored how seemingly ordinary cybercrime was combined with strategic espionage.

It may also be of interest that many of the dossier’s cybersecurity allegations such as the ties between the Russian government intelligence services and cybercrime actors and the drivers and mechanisms between state and criminal cooperation are repeated almost verbatim in Nellie Ohr’s Accenture Security presentation that she delivered almost a year after the dossier came out in the FS-ISAC 2017 Summit.

For example, the case study in her 2017 presentation explored how seemingly for profit Romanian and Bulgarian hackers combined with strategic Russian espionage initiatives. This case study mirrors dossier report #166.

Nellie’s 2017 presentation was itself recycled almost verbatim from the 2010 symposium hosted by the National Institute of Justice. The subject of that event was: Legal Racketeering in Russia and National Security Issues.

The talk raised these questions:
How are international criminal organizations attempting to co-opt the state to suit its interests? How are states attempting to use international criminal organizations to advance their interests? How does international organized crime present itself as a national security threat to different types of countries?

How do links to other malevolent actors, like terrorist or insurgent groups, manifest themselves and factor into the previous questions?

So it seems that the Ohrs have been cannibalizing and presenting this “raw intelligence” for several years from DOJ, FBI, and other agency sources long before it made it into the dossier.

The context of a source is an important part of all intelligence reports. It describes in greater detail the circumstances under which the source acquired the intelligence, the source’s reporting history, and other pertinent details such as source’s credibility (i.e. his past success and failure). None of Steele’s briefs contain this information. It seems that all of his sources have the same monolithic credibility and the method of obtaining the intelligence is always shrouded in obscurity.

Every source can have a credibility ranging from ‘Pathological Liar’ to the ‘Word of G-d’. All intelligence and law enforcement organizations have grading systems for their sources. Credibility is also a subtle thing that depends on many constantly changing factors.

The Key tradecraft for any case officer is the ability to constantly evaluate and determine the credibility of his sources. One of the glaring problems with Steele’s reports is that his source credibility indicator uses vague fluffy terms like “well-placed”, “trusted”, “knowledgeable, etc. Steele is not assigning sufficient granularity of trust to his sources.

None of the briefs show any doubts about the sources. The general impression is that Steele’s assets are all wheat and no chaff, one hundred percent reliable and are the cream of the crop of Russian politics, security services, and the Kremlin. They read like a cast of characters from a corny John le Carré novel.

What is ostensibly missing from his stellar list of informants are common everyday sources like:
• Low level bureaucrats
• Western intelligence sources
• Reporters
• Academics
• Political opposition figures
• Other anti-Russian FSU sources like Ukrainian and Polish intelligence
• Business figures
• Black-hat hackers (working as contractors for Steele)
• Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
• The legions of the disgruntled and the axe-grinders

Steele also seems to be enamoured with the titles of his sources and doesn’t provide any indication that he cross-verified their intelligence. In the instance of the alleged sexual acts in the Ritz-Carlton Moscow, he cites the following triple-source:
• A senior staff employee at the hotel
• An active FSB officer
• A senior security officer at the hotel (who would likely be a former FSB or GRU officer)

With assets like this he could have easily confirmed the story by checking out the hotel’s video surveillance footage from the hallway in question.

The Ritz-Carlton Moscow has been using CCTV cameras from the mid-2000’s and have in fact switched to a VMS based system in 2012. Steele could have asked his “active FSB officer” for the specific day and time of the alleged November 2013 incident and then used his “senior security officer” at the hotel to use a phone to take a screenshot of the video frame showing the individuals in the hallway entering and leaving the room.

In a recent court testimony Christopher Steele has acknowledged that his final December 2016 report (# 166), contained information he never vetted.

He stated that: “The contents of the report did not represent (and did not purport to represent) verified facts, but were raw intelligence which had identified a range of allegations that warranted investigation given their potential national security implications”.
It’s easy to get lost in all of these weasel words but the common term for “raw intelligence” that does not represent nor purport to represent credible or verified facts is called a rumour.

On the question of chain of transmission, we have the same problem as with the verifiability. When asked about his collection methods, Christopher Steele said: “Such intelligence was not actively sought; it was merely received.”

This is a dream come true for every collection officer — a gift of priceless information with no strings attached, no risk, no clandestine work, no money paid and no treasure exchanged. It’s high-value actionable intelligence just tossed over the transom, for naught…

In late 2016, the FBI finally homed-in on the problem that they had when they used the dossier for the FISA applications and Steele’s lack of source credibility and verifiability. They allegedly offered him about $50K to corroborate the dossier. For obvious reasons, he didn’t, couldn’t, or wouldn’t do it.

In intelligence analysis, there is a concept of a runaway feedback loop that occurs when information becomes re-iterated and rewarded in perpetual cycles.

For example, “Analyst A” releases a bit of dubious intel. “Analyst B” reads the claim and puts it in his report. “Analyst A” reads the intel in Analyst B’s report and decides that his intel may actually be true. “Analyst C” picks up “Analyst A’s” and “Analyst B’s” reports and expands on it creatively. “Analyst A” and “Analyst B” now are certain that their original piece was accurate. Actually, none of it is accurate.

The same applies to many of Steele’s briefs; they progressively build upon previous dubious intel using terms like “Continuing on this theme”.

The general impression of the reports is that they contain threads of truth, but also spurious content. For example, report #080 describes the Miss Universe 2013 event but then it provides a dubious account of sexual activity that even the author claims can’t be verified (“all direct witnesses to this recently had been “silenced”). Almost all of the ‘valuable’ intelligence in the reports exhibits the hallmarks of professional disinformation such as:
• Fabricated content−Creating content that is completely false
• Imposter content−Impersonating a genuine source with some made-up details
• Misleading content−Misattributing valid information to a wrong topic or a person
• Manipulated content−Doctoring genuine information

The briefs are inconsistent with Trump’s name. In some, they use the moniker “TRUMP”, in others, they uses lengthy titles like: “Republican US presidential candidate Donald TRUMP”. Clearly, the target audience of the reports knows who Trump is, so why is it necessary to use a 4-5 word qualifier to identify him? One possible explanation is that the information came from some foreign intelligence repository where the details on each target were stored in a structured format like:
[Party affiliation]
[Political office]
[First Name] & [Last name]
[Incident Details]

The briefs also contain many poorly formed sentences. For example, the subheading of Company Intelligence Report 2016/080 title is: “Republican candidate Donald Trump’s activities in Russia and compromising relationship with the Kremlin.” The phrase is missing the word ‘his’ and should read: “Republican candidate Donald Trump’s activities in Russia and his compromising relationship with the Kremlin.”

One “Summary” phrase says: “…So far TRUMP has declined various sweetener real estate business deals…”

Another sentence begins with “Speaking to a trusted compatriot.” After trying to make sense of the sentence, it’s clear that the writer meant “according to a trusted compatriot.”

It is difficult to explain how Steele actually wrote this. “Chris Steele,” known in his early days as a reporter for the Varsity Cambridge University student publication, also served as president of the Cambridge Union Society, a debating club. So the riddle is: how could a Cambridge University journalist and master English debater form such phrases and confuse a common figure of speech like sweetener with sweetheart?

Paragraphs like the following need no further discussion:
“Alpha [Alfa] held ‘kompromat’ on Putin and his corrupt business activities from the 1990s whilst although not personally overly bothered by Alpha’s failure to reinvest the proceeds of its TNK oil company sale into the Russian economy since, the Russian president was able to use pressure on this count from senior Kremlin colleagues as a lever on Fridman and AVEN to make them do his political bidding.”

There are many gilded passages that have no other purpose beyond creating indignation and outrage. For example, one paragraph states: “Trump’s previous efforts had included exploring the real estate sector in St. Petersburg as well as Moscow but in the end Trump had had to settle for the use of extensive sexual services there from local prostitutes rather than business success.”
The writer could have simply noted that while in St. Petersburg on business, Trump allegedly engaged the services of prostitutes.

Besides the obvious contextual problem with this paragraph, it is difficult to logically balance “sexual services” and “business success”.

So in lieu of business success, Trump settled for extensive sex? What is the significance of qualifier “extensive”?

Does the writer mean to say ‘frequent’? And what is the significance of the term “local” in the context of prostitutes?

Does the source know these prostitutes personally and is vouching for the fact that they are from St. Petersburg or Moscow?

It also appears that some of the report headers were written in the style of sensational newspaper headlines like in: “Further evidence of extensive conspiracy between TRUMP’s campaign team and Kremlin”.

This style doesn’t fit the succinct and factual standards expected in an intelligence report.

Finally, from literary point of view, this whole episode seems to be a revival of the 2009 story about Silvio Berlusconi spending the night with a prostitute in a hotel room in Rome ‘defiling’ Putin’s bed.

In writing about sex, the author is particularly byzantine. He says that Russian authorities had compromised Trump by catching him in his “personal obsessions and sexual perversion.“

In another instance, Trump was alleged to have gotten revenge on the Obamas by: “defiling the bed where they had stayed on one of their official trips to Russia by employing a number of prostitutes to perform a ‘golden showers’ urination show.“

These archaic terms hint that the writer had some classical training because it sounds like he/she is using phraseology from Suetonius’s The Twelve Caesars (see reference to Tiberius and his ‘licentious indulgences and sexual perversion’ and Nero’s ‘defiling’ acts).

The usage of “a number” with the plural form “prostitutes” seems forced and is designed to emphasize the ‘largeness’ of the event. As far as showers go, the phrase is “golden shower” singular. And what is the purpose of the explanatory ‘AKA’ term “urination show”? It’s redundant and suggests that the writer himself didn’t understand the original term.

One expects to find definite and indefinite articles that are often omitted. For example, the phrase “to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance” is missing “the” before “western alliance.” The phrase “anchored upon countries’ interest” should read: “anchored upon the country’s interest“. The author frequently misuses the possessive form as well.

Sentences that begin with the word “however” without a comma as in: “However it has not as yet been distributed abroad.” In other instances, “however” is followed by a comma: “However, there were other aspects …“. There is no consistency in the use of serial commas before or after conjunctions like ‘and’ and ‘but”.

The briefs suggest that there were multiple authors, one perhaps Russian/Ukrainian and one British\American. At one point, the reader is told that the Trump campaign leaked the DNC documents to WikiLeaks “to swing supporters of Bernie SANDERS away from Hillary CLINTON and across to TRUMP.”

The “Summary” section cleans up the language. Now the goal is to switch voters “away from CLINTON and over to TRUMP.”

This stenographic sleight of hand is forced and artificial. Whoever was conducting the original interview or data collection would/should have corrected this at the moment of transcription.

Steele is a Brit educated in British English. The document contains distinctly British spellings such as “programme,” “defence,” “authorised,” and “manoeuvre.” So, are we to assume that Steele’s deep intelligence assets in the FSB and Kremlin also attended Cambridge? Or perhaps these intelligence sources did attend Cambridge and like Steele were either current of former employees British foreign service.

There are other little details that bog the mind like when the author writes: “Things had become even ‘hotter’ since August on the TRUMP-RUSSIA track.” What does the term “hotter” mean? Does he mean busier? More complex? And what is the significance of the quotes?

One point that repeats itself toward the end of the document is the notion of “Moscow’s interference in the US Presidential election campaign.” Another is Trump’s perceived “unfitness” for office. These statements read less like raw intelligence and more like some talking points for a political speech.

The dossier’s content and network graph are interesting, but what about the writing style? Can we find the author’s fingerprints? To perform this analysis, I needed writing samples of a few hundred words from each potential author.

I’ve managed to get writing samples for all three dossier musketeers.

Nellie Ohr has a significant amount of book reviews and articles online.

Baumgartner was little more challenging. Most of his writings are not on-line—which is quite an achievement for a person who claims to have been a reporter for several years. I found a depository with some of his commercial work and his Thesis. Steele’s was by far the most difficult to locate. Despite his working as a reporter for the Cambridge Varsity student newspaper, all of the digitized copies of his prose have disappeared without a trace from the Cambridge library. I was fortunate enough to be able to pull a few copies of his articles from another source.

The textual analysis of the reports comprising the dossier shows some interesting results. First, I created a ground truth baseline for each of the dossier team members. The ground truth was based on writings they published prior to 2016.

Once I had a good baseline and a stylistic fingerprint, I proceeded to analyse the individual reports. Despite Steele’s claim that he wrote the document, it is almost certain that it was written by another person(s), likely a foreign source, possibly Baumgartner, or Ohr. The writing style fits their writer profile in multiple categories.

There are, however, a few anomalies in the data that indicate that some of the content—especially the latter reports that are written in an American English and have ‘talking point’ style—have been written by another unidentified author(s).

In addition to the writing style analyses, I’ve also correlated the content of the dossier briefs with various social media sources like Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook. The results reinforce the conclusion of the writing style results. As you can see below, Baumgartner’s tweets touch on many of the topics and phrases in the dossier such as:

Mikhail (Misha) Fridman, The Alfa group, rigging the elections, divisive campaigning,

US citizens of Russian (Jewish) origin, Kremlin buyer’s remorse, and others. They also closely match the dossier composition dates.

Baumgartner social media posting history is also noteworthy because it correlates directly with his work in Fusion GPS. For example, he is re-posting information about the dossier utilizing pre-public leaked information. He’s essentially betraying prior knowledge of the dossier by including these specific buzzwords in his tweets.

On October 31, 2016, Baumgartner was already retweeting the “dossier”. Of interest are the dates. According to the date stamp on the last dossier, report # 186, it was written on 13 December 2016. So, if we to accept this chronology, then we must conclude that individual reports were leaked out as soon as they were written, indicating that the dossier was not released in a single final batch form.

After his initial retweet of the dossier, he embarks on a regular publication schedule further discussing some of the core talking points in the document.

This includes topics like “Trump is a Russian agent”. He also makes a sheepish reference to “Christopher Steele, ex-British Intelligence officer, said to have repared [sic] dossier on Trump…”, and the rationale for why a private security firm (i.e. Fusion GPS and Orbis) had to do Clapper’s job.

As time goes on and the dossier story fails to create a groundswell, Baumgartner starts exhibiting signs of outrage. In addition to a lot of profanity, his posts also include calls for a coup against the “scumbag” elected president.

We know that Simpson and Jacoby played a significant role in the dossier’s ‘architectural’, ‘editorial’, and ‘creative’ writing processes.

In his testimony, Simpson confirmed sharing his investigative research with Steele.

Obviously, he also directly supervised Ohr, Baumgartner, and several other resources. Fusion GPS’s involvement certainly went beyond just coordinating SMEs and acting as the general contractor for the law firm Perkins Coie who had commissioned the report and paid them over $1.2 million for it.

Simpson and Jacoby also acted as the sources (using their original research) and intakes for some of the US political material found in the dossier that shows up in phrases like “an American political figure” and “TRUMP’s associate”. This included communications with: Shailagh Murray, Lisa Holtyn, Cody Shearer (who was working on a ‘second Trump-Russia dossier’), and direct emails to and from Sidney Blumenthal, Jonathan Winer, and Scott Dworkin who managed the Democratic Coalition’s opposition research and publication (see samples below).

Jonathan Winer himself sheds light on this information pipeline. According to his own account, he and Steele met and became friends in 2009 when both were in the business of selling intelligence about Russia. Winer went back to work at the State Department in 2013 but stayed in touch with Steele. He regularly shared Steele’s work with the State Department’s Russia desk.
“Over the next two years, I shared more than 100 of Steele’s reports with the Russia experts at the State Department, who continued to find them useful.”

Contrary to Simpson’s claim that Steele leaked the dossier content on his own initiative, Fusion GPS took a leading role in the publication process. In addition to coordinating a regular stream of social media postings, they also worked the ‘friendly’ commercial media outlets like CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo, New Yorker, and Yahoo News, and published op-eds and expert reviews that supported the dossier’s credibility.

One thing worth noting is that just like in the case of the core dossier network, many of these ‘receptive’ reporters such, David Corn, Joe Palazzolo, David Cay Johnston, Scott Dworkin and Evan Perez (images 32-33) had long incestuous relationships with Fusion GPS and it’s team members.
Image 32: Dworkin on multiple MSNBC News investigative interviews defending the dossier and promoting Russian collusion

Joe Palazzolo, Aruna Viswanatha, Steve LeVine, and David Johnston worked for Jacoby as early as 2010 producing Russia and corruption related reports. Between 2016-2018, Palazzolo and Viswanatha, now writing for the WSJ wrote dozens of anti-Trump articles.

Their publications rate sometime reached one article a week.

Steve LeVine, who now works for Axios delivering “trustworthy news”, wrote a lengthy apologetic article about Fusion GPS and its team, vouching for their credibility and professionalism. LeVine is just one of a dozen of ‘objective’ reporters that have been promoting the dossier and collusion narratives and shielding Fusion GPS, but never disclosing that they had a previous and/or a current business affiliation with Mary Jacoby, Glenn Simpson, and other Fusion GPS actors.

Steve LeVine shielding Fusion GPS in the Derwick Associates Venezuela corruption investigation

Joe Palazzolo’s, David Johnston’s, and Jacoby’s Russia articles on the now deleted “Just Anti-Corruption” website

David Johnston, and Aruna Viswanatha working for Mary Jacoby in 2010

David Johnston, an Al-Jazeera reporter and a Jacoby employee since at least 2009, is one of the leading paid anti-Trump authors. He has written six books, multiple articles, and participated in dozens TV interviews that promote the dossier allegations. He and his social network also produce and distribute a large volume of Russian collusion related materials.

Image 33: Evan Perez pitching the dossier and Russian collusion on CNN News. Perez at a Fusion GPS family event and Guys’ Night Out with Neil King Jr. 2012

The CNN Trump Dossier and Collusion team: Jake Tapper, Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, and Carl Bernstein receiving the Merriman Award from Jonathan Karl from ABC. Martha Ohr, was Karl’s news producer at ABC Television. Karl was also at Vassar College with Peter Fritsch and Martha Ohr’s sister-in-law Nellie Ohr.

A good illustration of how effective this ‘rent a journalist’ process is can be glanced from the activity of William Browder the CEO of Hermitage Capital and the brain behind the Magnitsky act. In April 2016, When the European parliament was about to screen Andrei Nekrasov’s “The Magnitsky Act-Behind the Scenes” movie. Browder sent an email to Matthew Kaminski, the executive editor of Politico and a WSJ reporter (and a close friend of Kramer, Simpson, Jacoby, and Fritsch) asking him to ‘cover’ the upcoming event. In the email dated 4/24/16 Browder writes:
”…The filmmaker [Andrei Nekrasov] is the boyfriend of the Vice Chair of the Green Party, Heidi Hautula, who is hosting the film. We have a bunch of things planned to make this a real scandal and I’d love for Politico to report on what we’re doing. Do you have time for a chat today? My mobile is +447785904192. Can you send me yours or a good time to talk? Thanks and best regards, Bill”

On 4/27/16, only three days after Browder ordered the hit, Politico published an article titled “MEPs dragged into Russia film row”. It goes without saying that the coverage was derogatory towards the movie and director and used the same unverified Intel that Browder provided Kaminsky.

This is by no means a single isolated incident, Matthew Kaminski, just like Evan Perez, David Johnston, and other ‘dossier friendly’ reporters dedicate significant amount of their commercial publications as well as their own private Twitter activity to anti-Trump and Russia collusion content.

In a similar fashion to Kaminski’s and Baumgartner’s Twitter posts, Perez’s, Tapper’s, Sciutto’s, and Bernstein’s tweets (see below) strongly suggest that they also had early and direct access to the dossier team and were actively distributing its content as it was being written.

As far as the journalist’s motivation to publish content favorable to the dossier, it’s clear from the congressional records that this was certainly not due to concerns about the integrity of our republic. In at least 3 cases, Fusion GPS/other sources paid reporters five digit figures for these publications. This can be deduced from image 34, where the length of redacted payment fields for transactions 198 and 205 are the same length as a visible $91K payment in transaction 171.

What’s with the Ham?

There is a lot of buzz on-line about Nellie Ohr’s Ham radio license and her possible uses for it. On May 23rd, 2016, just as the dossier project was kicking into gear, (Steele was only hired in June), Nellie Ohr, at the ripe old age of give-or-take 55, got a Technician radio license.
Her registration information was:
Nellie H. Ohr,
Call sign: KM4UDZ
6435 Tucker Ave
McLean, VA 22101
License Class: Technician
License Issue Date: May 23 2016
License Expiration Date: May 23 2026
FCC Last Transaction: LIISS
FCC Licensee ID: L02028239
FCC FRN Number: 0025607250
Latitude: 38.94, 38d 56m 24s N
Longitude: -77.19, 77d 11m 24s W
Grid: FM18
County: Fairfax

There are a number of curious things about Ohr getting an amateur radio license so late in her career.
• Her professional profile does not show her to be the techie type. She doesn’t possess any hacker, computer, or engineering skills (which is what typically motivates people to get an Amateur Radio license).
• She doesn’t belong to any ARRL radio club in the Fairfax area
• The radio clubs in her registration area have no records of administering the exam (Ham Radio exams are typically administered by the local ARRL club).
• Her call sign, KM4UDZ, shows no public activity which is odd, because new Hams are typically very chatty and can’t stay off the air when they first get their license.

As can be seen in Image 35, her technician rating is the lowest class of amateur radio license and has limited privileges with regard to the available frequencies and transmitter power output.

So for all of the conspiracy theorists out there that believe that Ohr was engaged in OSS style night transmissions from a secret compartment in the barn to her controller in Moscow: she wasn’t. The radio class limits would only give her a line of sight range of 5-10 miles. In a repeater mode, she could push the range to 20-200 miles. If you don’t think that a 10-mile range is sufficient, think again.

It is likely that Ohr’s rationale for using a Ham radio was a substitution for a cell and landline phones in order to communicate with person(s) nearby. As you can see from the map below, even with a 7.5 radius she was well within the range of the entire downtown Washington D.C. area.

We know that Nellie Ohr was the dossier’s liaison to some other agencies. It’s not unlikely that someone versed in SIGINT told her that she had to use a Ham radio because if the project went south, the first line of investigation would have been to subpoena all of her cell and phone records and analyze them to completely re-construct her operational network.

We know that Nellie Ohr’s husband, Bruce Ohr, was the Department of Justice’s contact for Steele and Fusion GPS and in fact held meetings with both about the dossier. We also know that Ohr headed a task force code named Cassandra and Operation Fast and Furious that among other things utilized cell phone tracking technology to identify money laundering, drugs, and weapon smuggling. So, it makes sense that he was aware of the need for electronic surveillance countermeasures.

But what about tracing her Ham call sign during transmission, wouldn’t that eliminate her radio anonymity?

In theory, yes, but in practice, it can be circumvented. This problem could have been solved with devices like the Harris XG-75P/100P. Encrypted radio transmissions can be used to obscure the identity of the sender/receiver of the message. For example, unencrypted HSMM uses a ping packet containing the station call sign to identify the station, similar to how a 2-meter repeater periodically announces its call sign. But if HSMM is operated using WEP encryption (available as a plug-in), those packets would be obscured and the call sign of the station licensee could not be received by anyone without the keys. So, in addition to the encrypted voice the identity of the sender call signs would also be hidden.

Indeed the dossier does not stand out as a unique document. Hakluyt seems to have used the same technique before.

In 2002, they were contracted by Medusa Oil and Gas Limited to do some opposition research and dig-up dirt on a rival Czech company. Hakluyt, used UK government back channels to deliver a dossier style brief to the UK Ambassador in Prague and to the First Commercial Secretary at the British Embassy in Prague who was also a principal representative in the Czech Republic of British Trade International.

The purpose of the document was to pressure the Czech government to prosecute the Czech targeted company. The letter made some defamatory claims about the company’s principals and its structure closely resembled Steele’s dossier. It had a bulleted layout with an intro section and a detailed discussion. Contextually, It made the same type of unverified allegation that included corruption and other crimes.

The Fusion GPS work style on the dossier is also well-documented and is based on a long track record of political and media influence operations world-wide. Alek Boyd, an investigative reporter who managed to run into the Fusion GPS buzzsaw, is a good illustration of how they operate.

Boyd was reporting on Derwick Associates, a Venezuelan company that allegedly skimmed billions of dollars from rigged contracts with Hugo Chavez’s regime and partnered with Gazprom, a Russian state owned oil conglomerate. Fearing US criminal charges and regulatory sanctions, Derwick Associates contracted Fusion GPS to help them spike a potential investigation and negative US media coverage.

On Monday July 21, 2014, Peter Fritsch and Adam Kaufmann, the former New York district attorney chief prosecutor, boarded a Falcon 2000 private jet at the Ft. Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport with the destination of Caracas Venezuela.

The plane was piloted by Gilbert Enrique Deleaud, an employee of Derwick Associates. The flight reservation was done through Massiel Hernandez, the pilot’s domestic partner who was also an employee of Derwick Associates.

The purpose of Fritsch’s three day visit to Caracas was to do some damage control by meeting with Wall Street Journal reporter José de Córdoba who was writing an investigative article about Derwick Associates. Fritsch previously worked with José de Córdoba at the WSJ.

A vicious social media smear campaign followed and included social media posting labeling him as a pedophile, drug addict, and thief. Someone even created blogger site with a fake Spanish police arrest warrant and Twitter account under his name with postings of photos of him walking around London with his daughters…

So who is really behind the Dossier

So who researched and wrote the core parts of the dossier?

It looks like it was a full-on team effort originating with Barack Obama and going down from there on…

As we said earlier — most of the textual evidence points to Glenn Simpson and his wife Mary Jacoby as the architects of the dossier framework.

This can also be gleaned from Jacoby’s June 24, 2017 Facebook posting (which was deleted promptly with most of her SM activity after the project derailed) where she brags about her husband’s leading role in its composition and vents her frustration about Steele monopolizing the limelight.

When it comes to the research, promotion, and distribution work, the linkage shows that a fair amount of ‘staging’ activity took place in both the US (in the pre dossier stages) and the UK and involved individuals such as, Stefan Halper, Jonathan Clarke, Richard Dearlove, Charles Crawford, Iain Lobban, and Alexander Downer.

It is also interesting that many of Robert Otto’s “Russia Workgroup” pen pals include the same Australian and UK diplomatic and IC actors that by July 2016 aggressively promote the dossier and vouch for its authenticity.

The same type of staging and delivery took place in the US through the State department sources like Robert Otto and the political and PR work of Alexandra Chalupa, Natalie Budaeva, and Ilya Zaslavskiy and their pro-Ukraine ‘Free Russia Foundation’ NGOs.

It is notable that a lot of this activity dates to first week of April (White House meeting of April 10th of 2016) and it goes onto May 2016, almost 8 weeks before Steele’s official June 2016 contract with Fusion GPS.

This strongly suggests that there was a proto-dossier in place and that there was a wider coordinated effort between the US and UK teams with Orbis Business Intelligence likely acting as a front for Hakluyt & Co.

The existence of a proto-dossier that predates Christopher Steele’s work is further supported by an email written by Robert Otto to John Williams, the director of the Office of Analysis for Russia and Eurasia in the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research.

In this email titled “the fried document” and dated May 1, 2016, Otto comments on some of the building blocks of the future dossier including how effective or damaging various claims would be.

For example, on the subject of “Fridman” and “Alfa” (see Dossier page 25 report 112) he writes: … It’s not clear that Aven/Fridman’s investments in Ukraine are in line with Kremlin policy. Alfa is a bank; banks issue loans. So what’s the big deal with its loans to UVZ? It’s a loss making enterprise and Alfa has threatened bankruptcy proceedings over non-payment. I fail t see how that’s at the Kremlin request. …I know nothing about Karimova’s ties to Alfa. She has them to Usmanov. And it’s Usmanov and Shvidler (Abramovich) who allegedly bribed Shuvalov, not Alfa… …A search in Integrum on “magnitskiy” and “al’fa” gets five hits.

Not a one is about Alfa laundering Magnitskiy money, let alone a central role.

Why repeat something so easily checkable. Was it some sort of Alfa subsidiary? If so, name it. See above on Shuvalov – some of the money may have went through Alfa, but that’s not what went public. (tidbit: one of the folks exposing Shuvalov is Natalya Pelevin that same who shared Kasyanov’s bed and chatted about an anti-Navalnyy front) …A very serious allegation that requires investigation…We have former Alfa fellows working in the building.

Otto’s comment that “We have former Alfa fellows working in the building” also suggests that other active State Department Intelligence resources were privy to these conversations.

Ilya Zaslavskiy’s early 2016 activity in the UK also shows some of the Trump dossier themes such as the business relationship with the “Alfa-Bank” in several of his anti-Russian Oligarch campaigns.

Ohr’s and Baumgartner’s roles were likely to research specific Russian content and re-write the narrative in ‘Russian style’ in order to make it appear authentic.

The ‘hard’ intelligence probably came from British and Ukrainian sources who may have also provided some of the juicy gossip.

Nellie Ohr utilized DOJ and State Department documents that pertained to Russian organized crime, cybersecurity, corruption, and opportunistically incorporated them into the dossier briefs.

This careful mixture of partial truth and fiction explains all of the titbits of information in the report that are marginally plausible and give the dossier a first-person witness quality and a thin veneer of creditability.

Simpson alludes to this when he said in the testimony: We –you know, they [Steeles network of resources] identified -one memo identified a Russian guy who worked for an NGO called Rossotrudnichestvo, which is –you know, I didn’t know it at the time, but I was able to learn from looking at it that the FBI considers that to be a front for the SVR. So, you know, either the people were extremely knowledgeable about a lot of obscure intelligence stuff or, you know, they –what they’re saying had some credibility.

When it comes to the bulk of the literary work, Simpson, Jacoby, Baumgartner and Nellie Ohr likely authored the “Russian Dossier” and Christopher Steele did a little actual writing, and basically just formatted the reports in order to tag them with his “scent” and make them look “spyish” by using terms like “Source X” “silenced” “corroborated” etc, and redacting some phrases.

Nellie Ohr, Shailagh Murray, and Mary Jacoby, also played organizational roles and acted as liaisons between the FusionGPS team, the State Department, the DOJ, the FBI, and the White House, and also served as cut-outs with other security agencies.

As a matter of fact, anyone who has ever worked in intelligence knows that a good brief should answer the who, what, when, where, how, and why questions. Almost none of the allegations in the dossier offer hard corroboration. It is mostly based on generalizations, truisms, and a lot of materials that were circulating on the internet as clickbait for the mentally unstable, and as tin-foil-hat conspiracy theories within Ukrainian circles since the mid 2000s.

To their literary credit, the writers of the dossier anticipated this criticism and countered it by building-in plausible deniability for most of the allegations through statements like: “But key witnesses silenced and evidence hard to obtain” or “all direct witnesses to this recently had been “silenced”…”

It seems that the real dossier story is not the scandalous insinuations that it makes, but rather it is the peculiarly large funding sources, the extraordinarily large teams of people that worked on it, and the compilation and distribution channels. At peak capacity, the dossier team must have consisted of at least 25 individuals who worked on it for over 6-12 months, at considerable cost to all involved.

Assuming a modest $200 per hour rate per person, some first/business class travel and accommodations, media, consulting, IT, and legal services, this project most have cost an upwards of 5-10 million dollars. According to Simpson’s testimony and documents, Fusion GPS was only paid about a million dollars by the DNC and Clinton campaign, which begs the questions of what was Hakluyt’s cut and where did the rest of the money go?

Perkins Coie the extreme leftist Law Firm from Seattle paid many millions of “Black Money” for this effort and much of that black money was never revealed till now…

Simpson and Steele did far more than simply conduct sordid opposition research for the Clinton campaign. By various machinations, they successfully reached the most influential people in UK and US politics, the media, and federal government agencies and shaped/influenced the narrative of the 2016 presidential elections.

There is little doubt that Simpson/Jacoby and their US political/media network and Steele with his enablers in Hakluyt, the British media, and the Foreign Office successfully waged a full-scale influence operation against the US and are continuing to do so even now. And Obama, Valerie Jarett, Perkins Coie, Susan Rice, and Hillary Clinton, are all “arse-deep” in this muck, right now, as we speak…

And there is no question that when these matters above are coupled as they should be with the Deep State’s attacks on the President, and with the fact that they were perpetuated by an orchestration of all the Secret Services, & the corrupt Justice Department, working in tandem with a corrupted and weaponized Obama White House and Hillary Clinton — it all amounts to a Deep State Coup D’Etat that threatened to topple our Republic.

Today, we can safely say that but for the Grace of God which is the only force that has prevented us from falling for this hoax headlong — we are still here standing and protecting our Laws and the Constitution.

And that is why we offer Thanks in our Prayers, for the amazing Divine Intervention that has saved our Republic thus far.

Because we are indeed massively Grateful for the love of Jesus that has given us Peace and Stability, and a Good President, who has kept us from being embroiled in a new Civil War.

And above all else we are praying that this evilness will be dismissed, and all good patriots will be protected from the shrapnel, from the IEDs, and from the bullets of the assassins, that are all emanating from this Coup D’Etat and the legions of evil enemies that the forces of Satan and the eternal darkness have unleashed upon us, to fight us for the Soul of our Republic.

We further pray that all of our divisions will be healed, and we will face the future ahead as a United States, and not as a divided country. This is my ultimate hope and prayer.

Because the forces that militate to tear us apart, are great, and the fact that the heads of the FBI and the heads of all the other secret and opaque security agencies, like CIA’s ex-chief, communist, socialist, globalist, jihadist, and all around deranged, as well as disgraced, Hitlery zealot Mr John Brennan, is still working alongside James, Comey, Sally Yates, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Susan Rice, James Clapper, Loretta Lynch, and many other hateful intellectual midgets, like Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok, McCabe, Lisa Page, and all other lusting after gaining power for themselves and for the disgraced Madame Secretary — work against us tearing down our Country — tells you all you need to know about these traitors to America, traitors to the Good Lord, and traitors to You the beloved Patriot & Citizen of this Great Country.

But once we have shined the light of the Lord upon them and identified them — half their power is gone and the other half will be removed once we stop them.

In conclusion, it would appear that we still have some more work to do… and some more walking before we get to leave the forest we lost ourselves into, and get out of these woods.

Best way out os to keep your compass pointing always to True North.


And …

God Bless America!

Dr Churchill


“Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing.”

-Theodore Roosevelt


It’s up to us ordinary patriots to pray, protect and support our People’s President and to suffer if needed be in the barricades as we fight the Good Fight against the forces of darkness and evil.

Let’s all pray and stand together patriots because this is the time of grave danger:

Screen Shot 2018-08-11 at 9.40.51 PM

Join me to do just that this September in the Heartland here:

Join “God, Arms, & Covenant, Conference” in Vantage, WA, on September 14th -16th

Friday, Sep 14, 2018, 5:00 PM

Holy Ground Pavilion
551 Main Street Vantage, wa

13 Churchillians Attending

This is the 80th anniversary edition of the “GOD, ARMS, & COVENANT” conference, started by Winston Churchill in 1938 to fight-off the National Socialists, the Defeatists, the Appeasers, the Fascists, and the Atheists, in order to protect the Nation, the Republic, and the Constitution. This is the same situation as the American Churchill faces today…

Check out this Meetup →

Or find yourself starting from here and join up:

God Bless the Patriots and God Bless America!


This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Forty Eight
“Congress asks for a Second Prosecutor to investigate the DOJ, FBI, and Special Prosecutor Mueller”


History repeats itself…

And time is the arbiter of all…

All things indeed are bound by time, including history and man…

Greek philosophers including Zeno, Plato and Aristotle always pondered and thought deeply about time but to no avail except to become Stoic and pensive about it as they aged and saw life and daylight being wasted as they advanced their concentric circles of thought phenomena…

But they taught others about it and that is important…

The mathematician and gifted astronomer Hypatia of Alexandria defined time as the only deistic vision she had of the stars and the heavens and she was punished for her views with death under the Christian Taliban zealots of her era…

Others many years later, like St Augustine of Hippo, expressed a more internalized view of time, as words and actions, and questioned the existence of “past” and “future.”

This was indeed a radical view of time, even for such an amazing man of faith, wisdom,  and Christian knowledge. Radically for his era, he saw time as a purely mental phenomenon.

In 1860, zoologist Karl Ernst Von Baer pondered the duration of “now” and challenged prevalent notions of persistence. He told the Russian Philosophical Society that “nothing lasts” not even mountains.

English philosopher and mathematician Russel, saw time as an impediment to our thought processes because eternal and Godly cannot easily be understood in terms of time and space.

US philosopher, polymath, poet, and all around Renaissance man, William James had an influential chapter on time perception: Being always skeptical of time as something concrete, he perceived only a “series of durations” such as empty moments don’t exist; your thoughts fill them. He quotes E.R. Clay, saying that people live in an illusory “specious present.”

Later philosophers such as Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), embraced a similarly subjective view of time.

Today’s accepted Physics agrees with the ancient view of time, as per Albert Einstein’s theory of special relativity, the faster you move, the more time slows. Astronauts in orbit and jet plane passengers age fractionally more slowly than people on the ground. The 24 time zones with “time zero” at Greenwich offer a clear definition of noon, the sun in its zenith everywhere on this rotating planet. With jet lag, your body’s internal clocks de-synchronize. Eating in-flight meals on your destination’s timetable may help. Humans who go to Mars will find the days 39 minutes longer than on Earth.

One study says human circadian rhythms can’t adapt, but others show acclimatization via gradual exposure to sun-equivalent light on a Mars schedule.

Yet in today’s time, the day started auspiciously with the announcement of the revocation of special privileges for ex-CIA chief Mr Brennan… who lost his Security Clearance for the United States highest security level of trust because of his timely nature to be an ass all the time 24/7/365 and to be willing to endanger this country always with his crazy Communist and Islamic Jihaddist world view.

This lying moron has not seen a radical view of the world that he didn’t espouse for reasons of plain old fashion insanity.

No wonder — with him being such a loud, foul, and crazy mouth — he lost his credentials to the safekeeping of our treasures of intelligence and valuable information. Right?

And although much furore has been aroused because of that — President Trump was completely correct and within his rights to revoke the security clearance of former CIA Director John Brennan, because Brennan, who now works as a national security analyst for MSNBC and NBC News, and frequently appears on TV, has no business browsing through our country’s most important and sensitive national security secrets — especially if he is unhinged and also as he appears on air he is liable to disseminate widely those secrets we hold dear…

Clearance to classified information is granted based on a “need to know.” Brennan has none, so there was no reason to allow him continued access. He does have a long pattern of misuse of his authority and lying about it.

It has been customary to allow former senior officials to keep their clearances so current officials can consult with them. No one in the Trump administration is or should be consulting with someone as partisan as Brennan, so pulling his clearance was right and proper.

Some are claiming this is political retribution, but the overtly political nature of Brennan’s attempts to undermine the Trump administration are a real problem. And even if he had a reason to keep his clearance, his actions and statements are grounds to cut him off.

Extending Brennan’s clearance was a privilege no longer justified by any value he provides to the government. His unhinged rants against President Trump would land any serving clearance holder with a suspension and possibly even a referral for psychiatric evaluation.

Amongst the many unhinged rants by Mr Brennan, we ought to include his unfounded claim on national television that President Trump is being blackmailed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. This is a gross distortion of reality and having Brennan, saying the Russians “may have something” on President Trump, and also having Brennan tweeting that kind of crap — does not represent the normal communications of a mentally stable person.

To cite just one other example, John Brennan tweeted in March, directing his comments to President Trump: “When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America … America will triumph over you.”

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., pointed out that Brennan has a history of unethical actions around classified information and has also often times lied to Congress itself. Paul stated: “I filibustered Brennan’s nomination to head the CIA in 2013, and his behavior in government and out of it demonstrate why he should not be allowed near classified information.”

Paul also questioned Brennan’s role as a paid TV commentator, tweeting last month: “Is John Brennan monetizing his security clearance? Is John Brennan making millions of dollars divulging secrets to the mainstream media with his attacks on our President Donald J Trump?”

I recognize that revoking security clearances could set a bad precedent for future administrations. A Democratic president could pull clearances of former officials who worked under a Republican president — but this is clearly not tit-for-tat. This is about protecting our national security. Nothing else.

Still the blame for the revocation of Brennan’s security clearance lies with Brennan himself – and not with President Donald Trump. Brennan is not being punished for his political views. He is being removed from any proximity to vital information because he has shown quite clearly and over time that he cannot be trusted with it.

Brennan is widely believed to have been a source for media outlets reporting on the Trump-Russia hoax and fake news scandal. If Brennan leaked classified information, that would be enough of a cause in order to take away his clearance.

It is almost certain that the Trump administration is conducting a counterintelligence investigation of Brennan to ascertain if – or more likely, how much – he leaked classified information. This investigation may have already led to more reasons to revoke his clearance than officials can make public.

Brennan is a dedicated member of the anti-Trump “resistance” which is chockfull of people who actively oppose America’s very nature. If he has shared his inside information with them, we have no idea where it could have spread. We need a full accounting of all his actions and if there were crimes committed he should feel the full weight of the criminal justice system.

Brennan had every right to oppose the Trump administration and speak publicly about it. No one has limited his freedom of speech or ability to criticize.

Brennan the former government official, and current TV commentator, and sadly unhinged partisan for Hillary Clinton, acted as a political activist who has just lost a security clearance that he no longer has any reason to be enjoying, because his awfully sloppy and insecure handling of classified information, along with his conspiratorial tendencies, and his main role in the attempted Coup D’Etat against our Republic — all deserve a full and thorough investigation.

At the very least he will become fodder for the mill of the Second Special Prosecutor that will be convened to arrange for the Investigation of this Coup D’Etat that is still ongoing in our country.

Now let us take a little break from all the coverage of Mueller’s “Russia” hoax investigation and assorted witch-hunt, and see what REAL Russian “meddling” looks like, because the life mission of dirty cop Robert Mueller seems to be setting up President Trump for “GOTCHA” moment.

Mueller cares nothing for our Republic and he just wants to perpetuate his Coup D’Etat unimpeded by any propriety and any lawful conduct so long as he can set-up the President who he dislikes venally, on the road to prosecution or impeachment. And he thinks that he can accomplish this by putting his former campaign manager on trial, for old bank loan applications, for some kind of fraud, and for tax charges – decades old and irrelevant to the Donald Trump campaign.

SO instead of that time waster, let us now take a look at a very real example of high-level Russian spying on Americans. This stunning new story from The Guardian reflects the kind of infiltration we ought to be investigating, instead of wasting precious time and resources of a plain old witch-hunt, resulting from a Russian hoax.

Because we now know that real Russian spying of current time, has resulted in access to some of our most highly classified information, even the President’s daily schedule. While the Mueller team is wasting time showing jurors pictures of Manafort’s closet, and his expensive suits, and threatening him with life in prison, in order to get him to offer up his former boss’ head on a platter, like St John’s — this is a story of very real Russian “meddling” that is emergent and fresh off the real time machine called the NOW.

But since this real Russian spying story is a huge embarrassment to the FBI, CIA, NSA, and assorted US security apparatus and questionable intelligence (?) community, and perhaps even an unwelcome distraction from the “get-Trump” narrative, having nothing whatsoever to do with Trump — we probably won’t be hearing much about it form the MSM and the leftist Clinton News Network others known as CNN.

And yes it’s the British press that uncovered this Russian meddling story and broke it wide open, because across the pond there is some real journalism still going on amongst the old fashioned newspaper hounds of Fleet street and the Manchester GUARDIAN, even in their new digs at the St Pancras KingsCross canal front glass building.

It was form here that investigative reporter Nick Hopkins has learned that for more than a decade, a Russian national was working undetected as an alleged spy at the American embassy in Moscow. She was hired by the Secret Service –- we still don’t have the details surrounding her hiring or how (if?) she was vetted –- and she didn’t come under suspicion until 2016, when the State Department’s Regional Security Office conducted a routine security sweep of the London, Paris and Moscow offices.

They made their report in January of 2017, but instead of launching an inquiry, which might have ended up making them look bad, the Secret Service just revoked her security clearance last summer and quietly let her go.

Her dismissal attracted essentially no attention at the time because it conveniently occurred when the Kremlin was demanding an expulsion of diplomatic personnel in the wake of new Washington-imposed sanctions. Over 750 out of 1,200 employees lost their positions, and the downsizing was used as cover to make it it look as though she was just part of it.

According to the Guardian’s source, “The Secret Service is trying to hide the breach by firing her. The damage was already done but the senior management of the Secret Service did not conduct any internal investigation to assess the damage and to see if she had recruited any other employees to provide her with more information. Only an intense investigation by an outside source can determine the damage she has done.

So, there may be more spying going on at our embassy in Moscow.

Oh, goody.

When the Secret Service was pressed for details, they released a statement downplaying the role this woman played. “At no time,” it said, “in any US Secret Service office, have FSNs [foreign service nationals] been provided or placed in a position to obtain national security information.”

Right, and Peter Strzok voted for Donald Trump. The State Department refused to comment on allegations related to intelligence or personnel matters, but acknowledged “that US government employees, by virtue of their employment with the US government, may be targeted by foreign intelligence services…when we identify an employee in violation of security directives, we take appropriate action at the appropriate time.” In other words, this woman WAS in a position to gain information from Americans working at the embassy. To admit that fact completely negates the lame attempt at reassurance offered by the Secret Service.

According to the source, this woman had a role that gave her insight into ongoing Secret Service investigations, and her position gave her access to the Secret Service intranet. Through this official email system, she had access to the schedule of the Presidents (current and former), the Vice Presidents, and their spouses, including Hillary Clinton and Billy-goat Clinton himself…

The woman went against the rules by interacting with several embassy employees on her personal email. There’s no telling what information she was able to glean from conversations with Americans. She apparently operated with very little supervision and was having “numerous unsanctioned meetings and communications” with the FSB, Russia’s principal security agency, and that’s what aroused suspicion.

To top it all off, once the Secret Service was on to her, the potential breach was not reported to any of the congressional oversight committees for fear of embarrassment of the secret service and of the State department.

Methinks that there needs to be a serious look at why the Secret Service hid what happened and failed to conduct a really thorough internal investigation on this serious breach of security and an instance of true Russian espionage.

Of course, the special counsel Robert Mueller who is specifically charged with investigating “Russian meddling” and espionage, could look into it. After all, he and his team, have all the necessary mandates, the requisite security clearances, and their mission statement is to investigate what the Russians are up to.

Yet, I am afraid that Robert Mueller will do absolutely nothing in this direction, because he is much too busy right now going after Donald Trump, and after Russian Facebook ads, and after the Twitter accounts of conservatives, and after the imaginary AI internet bots of Russia masquerading as real American patriots.

What a racket…

Mueller – the sponge Bob square pants — is too busy playing children’s video games to go after real actionable human intelligence officers of the GRU and other Russian agencies like the FSB, the successor to the KGB and all her other secret manifestations that are menacing our National Security.

No chance he will go there, because these are real professionals who have bested him at every turn. Of course we have to admit that it is not difficult to best an idiot like Mueller, but it is also laughable to admit that the Special Councel has no time for the real Spy Game, since Robert Mueller wants to go only against soft targets like the former campaign manager of the President whose crime is that in the 1970s, he wore some pricey ostrich jackets, and fancy bellbottom pants, sporting a mullet on his head, as he still does, and that his wife’s dresses are also hideously out of fashion, and all these secrets were hiding in plain sight inside their bedroom closet.

Now, nobody knows the exact moment that the Special Prosecutor Bob Mueller became the Fashion Police, and although this is beyond me, or maybe I simply don’t recall to have even received the memo that says that wearing terribly out of fashion clothes is a real crime that warrants the full force of the FBI and the Department of Justice and all of our Security apparatus in order to be stamped out.

Yet the TIME is NOW.

Yes, the TIME is NOW, and that makes it seem far more important to put this REAL story about a REAL intelligence breach involving a REAL Russian spy –- and the attempt to keep anyone from finding out about it, on the news.

That is, if there is any REAL NEWS left in this country that doesn’t love the FAKE sauce that is more addictive than fentanyl on toast for the fake newshound of CNN, the MSM, and the New York Times… along with their brethren the local syndicated news.
Former CIA Director John Brennan, who served under President Obama and is now the darling of the anti-Trump media as a contributor on MSNBC & CNN, can’t stop fuming publicly about what he perceives as punishment for disagreeing with President Trump: losing his top-secret clearance. He says Trump is trying to intimidate him and interfere with his freedom of speech, and he says it, and says it, and says it some more, whenever he wants, with no threat of repercussion, because nobody is interfering with his freedom of speech.

But what he doesn’t say is that no-one has the right to a security clearance. And indeed the ex-CIA directors have traditionally been allowed to keep their security clearance after they leave; it’s renewed every five years as a courtesy and also in case current staff wish to rely on their expertise in a given situation. There’s a condition, however: that former CIA directors “behave like current CIA employees.”

Brennan has failed spectacularly to fulfill that requirement, amongst the many other transgressions he has committed… He’s also shown himself to be so heatedly partisan and deranged and that he simply can’t be trusted on national security issues. And after he went so far as accusing the President of committing treason (a death penalty offense) simply for holding a press conference with Vladimir Putin, it’s hard to imagine a situation in which the current administration would wish to call upon him for anything, except maybe to do the opposite of what he says.

But if for some unfathomable reason they did need him, his security clearance could be reinstated. Peter Strzok’s was reinstated before his recent testimony before congressional oversight committees. I assume it was yanked again right afterwards but don’t know for sure. So, hypothetically, if the next administration were a bunch of “progressive” Democrats who were so “inclusive” they’d want to give a security clearance to a mouthy ex-spook who admitted during a polygraph when he joined the CIA in 1980 that he’d voted for the Communist Party in the ‘70s — how did this man get to be in the CIA at all, let alone end up running it? — they could always (shudder) give it back to him.

The anti-Trump media have gone wild, nonstop, over this. If you were to listen to them, it was “authoritarianism in its purest form.” And that comes from Ben Rhodes on MSNBC, “a brazen act of intimidation,” and “something you might see out of a dictatorship or authoritarian regime.”

The intelligence community has been ridiculously free with security clearances, seemingly handing them out like candy. An estimated 4 million Americans have them, including an unbelievable 1 million with top-secret clearance. I think about half of those people are now contributors on CNN and MSNBC. No wonder there are so many leaks. And is it any wonder we’re uncovering so much inappropriate –- and illegal –- political activity going on in our intelligence community when John Brennan has shown himself to be “Exhibit A”? All of those involved need to lose their clearances.

Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino pointed out on “Tucker Carlson” this past Wednesday that Brennan was the one who on August 25th of 2016, briefed Sen. Harry Reid about elements in the Christopher Steele “dossier” that were then put in an open letter to James Comey at the FBI, providing a pretense for the FBI investigation into then-candidate Trump. He’s bound to have been up to his eyeballs in the attempt to take down Trump, and it’s easy to agree with Bongino that he’s “a disgrace and a stain on the United States whose legacy will only be as a cautionary tale told to future CIA leaders about how not to act.”

Back to my original point, this certainly isn’t the first time a security clearance has been revoked, and Rowan Scarborough writing in the WASHINGTON TIMES has come across an interesting and very timely one. This is the story of Adam Lovinger, a 12-year strategist in the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment who complained to his superiors in the fall of 2016 about “sweetheart” contracts given to Stefan Halper, whom we now know was an FBI informant who spied on the Trump campaign. Lovinger blew the whistle on some other contracts, too, given to a close friend of Chelsea Clinton. On May 1, 2017, his security clearance was revoked and he was relegated to clerical duties.

According to Lovinger’s complaint, Halper had been contracted by James Baker, who ran the Office of Net Assessment, to conduct “foreign relations” when that task was supposed to be confined to government officials. Halper had also been awarded contracts totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars from a Pentagon support agency called the Washington Headquarters Service and, according to Lovinger’s attorney, was being paid “astronomically more than others similarly situated.”

As the attorney tells it, the people around the office had no idea what he was doing. The work they knew about seemed to be subcontracted; he was just acting as the middle man.

Halper’s name should ring a bell; he’s the “confidential human source” (SPY) who approached George Papadopoulos and also contacted Carter Page. For daring to speak up about the odd arrangement his bosses had with this man and other sad examples of what he saw as cronyism — Lovinger lost his security clearance.

Yet to me, this is ironic, because he seems like just the sort of person who should have one.

Yet, however we slice it — we now have fresh emails that conclusively show the 2016 links among Steele, Ohr, Simpson, of the FBI with the Russian oligarch Deripaska in the background of the GOTCHA game against President Trump…

Emails in 2016 between former British spy Christopher Steele and Justice Department official Bruce Ohr suggest Steele was deeply concerned about the legal status of a Putin-linked Russian oligarch, and at times seemed to be advocating on the oligarch’s behalf, in the same time period Steele worked on collecting the Russia-related allegations against Donald Trump that came to be known as the Trump dossier. The emails show Steele and Ohr were in frequent contact, that they intermingled talk about Steele’s research and the oligarch’s affairs, and that Glenn Simpson, head of the dirt-digging group Fusion GPS that hired Steele to compile the dossier, was also part of the ongoing conversation.

The emails, given to Congress by the Justice Department, began on Jan. 12, 2016, when Steele sent Ohr a New Year’s greeting. Steele brought up the case of Russian aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska (referred to in various emails as both OD and OVD), who was at the time seeking a visa to attend an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in the United States. Years earlier, the U.S. revoked Deripaska’s visa, reportedly on the basis of suspected involvement with Russian organized crime. Deripaska was close to Paul Manafort, the short-term Trump campaign chairman now on trial for financial crimes, and this year was sanctioned in the wake of Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election.

“I heard from Adam WALDMAN [a Deripaska lawyer/lobbyist] yesterday that OD is applying for another official US visa ice [sic] APEC business at the end of February,” Steele wrote in the Jan . 12 email. Steele said Deripaska was being “encouraged by the Agency guys who told Adam that the USG [United States Government] stance on [Deripaska] is softening.” Steele concluded: “A positive development it seems.”

Steele also asked Ohr when he might be coming to London, or somewhere in Europe, “as I would be keen to meet up here and talk business.” Ohr replied warmly the same day and said he would likely travel to Europe, but not the UK, at least twice in February.

Steele emailed again on Feb. 8 to alert Ohr that “our old friend OD apparently has been granted another official [emphasis in original] visa to come to the US later this month.” Steele wrote, “As far as I’m concerned, this is good news all round although as before, it would be helpful if you could monitor it and let me know if any complications arise.” Ohr replied that he knew about Deripaska’s visa, and “to the extent I can I will keep an eye on the situation.” Steele again asked to meet anytime Ohr was in the U .K . or Western Europe.

Steele wrote again on Feb. 21 in an email headlined “Re: OVD – Visit To The US.” Steele told Ohr he had talked to Waldman and to Paul Hauser, who was Deripaska’s London lawyer. Steele reported that there there would be a U.S. government meeting on Deripaska that week — “an inter-agency meeting on him this week which I guess you will be attending.” Steele said he was “circulating some recent sensitive Orbis reporting” on Deripaska that suggested Deripaska was not a “tool” of the Kremlin. Steele said he would send the reporting to a name that is redacted in the email, “as he has asked, for legal reasons I understand, for all such reporting be filtered through him to you at DoJ and others.”

Deripaska’s rehabilitation was a good thing, Steele wrote: “We reckon therefore that the forthcoming OVD contact represents a good opportunity for the USG.” Ohr responded by saying, “Thanks Chris! This is extremely interesting. I hope we can follow up in the next few weeks as you suggest.”

Steele was eager to see Ohr face to face. On March 17, Steele wrote a brief note asking if Ohr had any update on plans to visit Europe “in the near term where we could meet up.” Ohr said he did not and asked if Steele would like to set up a call. It is not clear whether a call took place.

There are no emails for more than three months after March 17. Then, on July 1, came the first apparent reference to Donald Trump, then preparing to accept the Republican nomination for president. “I am seeing [redacted] in London next week to discuss ongoing business,” Steele wrote to Ohr, “but there is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!” Steele said he had planned to come to the U.S. soon, but now it looked like it would not be until August. He needed to talk in the next few days, he said, and suggested getting together by Skype before he left on holiday. Ohr suggested talking on July 7. Steele agreed.

Ohr’s phone log for July 7 notes, “Call with Chris Steele” from 8:00 am to 8:30 am Eastern time.

A caution here: It is possible the “favourite business tycoon” could be Deripaska, or perhaps even someone else, and not Trump. But no one referred to Deripaska in that way anywhere else in the communications. Also, Steele made it clear the “tycoon” subject was separate from other business. And July 1 was just before Steele met with the FBI with the first installment of the Trump dossier. So it appears reasonable, given Steele’s well-known obsession with Trump, and unless information emerges otherwise, to see the “favourite business tycoon” as Trump.

On the morning of Friday, July 29, Steele wrote to say that he would “be in DC at short notice on business” later that day and Saturday. He asked if Ohr and wife Nellie were free for breakfast on Saturday morning. They were, and agreed to meet for breakfast at the Mayflower Hotel in downtown Washington.

Ohr’s log of contacts with Steele lists a meeting with Steele on July 30. Steele finished installments of the dossier on July 19 and 26.

On Aug. 22, Ohr received an email from Simpson with the subject line “Can u ring.” There was no message beyond a phone number. Ohr’s log lists some sort of contact — it’s not specified what — with Simpson on Aug. 22.

Steele finished an installment of the dossier on Aug. 22.

Steele dated three installments of the dossier on Sept. 14. On Sept. 16, Steele wrote Ohr to say that he would be back in Washington soon “on business of mutual interest.” Ohr said he would be out of town Sept. 19-21. On Sept. 21, Steele wrote to say he was in Washington and was “keen to meet up with you.” The two agreed to have breakfast on Sept. 23. Meeting on that date would be “more useful,” Steele said, “after my scheduled meetings” the day before. It’s not clear what those scheduled meetings were. Ohr’s log lists a meeting with Steele on Sept. 23.

On October 18, Steele emailed Ohr at 6:51 am with a pressing matter. “If you are in Washington today, I have something quite urgent I would like to discuss with you, preferably by Skype (even before work if you can).” Steele wrote. Ohr suggested they do it immediately. “Thanks Bruce. 2 mins,” Steele replied. Ohr’s log, lists a call with Steele on Oct. 18.

There is no note on what they discussed. But a few hours later, still on Oct. 18, Steele emailed Ohr again, and the subject was related to Deripaska. “Further to our Skypecon earlier today,” Steele wrote, Hauser had asked Steele to forward to Ohr information about a dispute between the government of Ukraine and RUSAL, Deripaska’s aluminum company. “Naturally, he [Hauser] wants to protect the client’s [Deripaska’s] interests and reputation,” Steele wrote. “I pass it on for what it’s worth.”

After another few hours had passed, Ohr asked if Steele had time for a Skype call. Steele said, let’s do it now. Ohr’s log lists calls with Steele on Oct. 18 and 19.

Steele finished dossier installments on Oct. 18, 19, and 20. The installment on Oct. 18 was the infamous Russians-offer-Carter-Page-millions-of-dollars allegation, and the ones on Oct . 19 and 20 concerned Manafort’s alleged role in an alleged collusion scheme.

On Nov. 21, other players entered the conversation. Ohr received an an email from Kathleen Kavalec, a deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of European Affairs in the State Department. (Kavalec is now President Trump’s nominee to be ambassador to Albania.) Kavalec sent Ohr information on Simon Kukes, a Russian-born executive who contributed more than $250,000 to Trump-supporting organizations after Trump won the Republican nomination. Kavalec said she met Kukes around 2014, when “Tom Firestone brought him in,” a reference to former Justice Department official Thomas Firestone, now a partner at the Washington law firm BakerHostetler. Kavalec also linked to a Mother Jones article about Kukes.

Ohr responded by saying, “I may have heard about him from Tom Firestone as well, but I can’t recall for certain.” Then Kavalec answered by saying she was “just re-looking at my notes from my convo with Chris Steele” and that “I see that Chris said Kukes has some connection to Serge Millian, an emigre who is identified by FT as head of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce.”

In the book Russian Roulette, authors Michael Isikoff and David Corn wrote that Millian claimed to have some sort of business relationship with the Trump organization — which the Trumps denied. More importantly, Millian went on to become Steele’s source for the infamous “golden showers” allegation that Donald Trump had engaged in a kinky sex scene in a Moscow hotel room in 2013.

Ohr’s phone log indicates that he called Simpson on Dec. 8 to set up a meeting for coffee the next day, Dec. 9.

There is not another email until Dec . 11. Simpson sent Nellie Ohr a link to an article in the left-wing ThinkProgress headlined, “Why has the NRA been cozying up to Russia?” The article focused on now-indicted Russian agent Maria Butina and Russian Alexander Torshin. Nellie Ohr responded, “Thank you!” to which Simpson, the next day, answered, “Please ring if you can.” Nellie Ohr forwarded the Simpson message to Bruce Ohr, saying, “I assume Glenn means you not me.”

Ohr’s phone log on Dec. 13th said, “Glenn Simpson. Some more news. Yesterday 9:27 am Spoke with him.”

Steele dated a dossier installment Dec. 13th.

On Jan. 20, 2017, inauguration day, Bruce Ohr received an email from Simpson that said simply, “Can you call me please?”

The emails raise a clear question of whether Steele was working, directly or indirectly, with Oleg Deripaska at the same time Steele was compiling the dossier — and whether the Justice Department, along with Simpson and Fusion GPS, was part of the project. Given Deripaska’s place in the Russian power structure, what that means in the big picture is unclear.

On Feb. 9 of this year, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley wrote a letter to Hauser, the London lawyer, and asked, “Is it the case that Mr. Steele, through you, works or has worked on behalf of Mr. Deripaska or businesses associated with him?”

Hauser refused to answer, claiming such information was privileged. But he added: “I can confirm that neither my firm nor I was involved in the commissioning of, preparation of or payment for the so-called ‘Steele Dossier.’ I am not aware of any involvement by Mr. Deripaska in commissioning, preparing or paying for that document.”

On Feb. 14, at an open hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton asked FBI Director Christopher Wray about Deripaska.

“Is it fair to call him a Putin-linked Russian oligarch?” asked Cotton.

“Well, I’ll leave that characterization to others, and certainly not in this setting,” Wray said.

“Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, last week sent a letter to a London-based lawyer who represents Mr. Deripaska,” Cotton continued, “and asked if Christopher Steele was employed, either directly or indirectly, by Oleg Deripaska at the time he was writing the so-called Steele dossier. Do you know if Christopher Steele worked for Oleg Deripaska?’

“That’s not something I can answer,” Wray said.

“Could we discuss it in a classified setting?”

“There might be more we could say there,” Wray answered.

The newly-released Ohr-Steele-Simpson emails are just one part of the dossier story. But if nothing else, they show that there is still much for the public to learn about the complex and far-reaching effort behind it to subvert our Democracy and destroy our Republic through a Coup D’Etat.

And here are twelve ways that ex-British spy 12 times Christopher Steele fed Trump-Russia allegations to the FBI after the elections of 2016 proving that the Coup D’Etat was a real thing…

Congressional investigators know that Christopher Steele, the former British spy who compiled the Trump dossier on behalf of the Clinton campaign, kept supplying allegations to the FBI after the 2016 election — and even after he was terminated as a “source” by the bureau for giving confidential information to the media.

Because he had broken his agreement with the FBI, bureau procedure did not allow agents to keep using Steele as a source. But they did so anyway — by devising a system in which Steele spoke regularly with Bruce Ohr, a top Obama Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, which hired Steele to search for dirt on Donald Trump in Russia. Ohr then passed on Steele’s information to the FBI.

In a highly unusual arrangement, Ohr, who was the fourth-highest ranking official in the Justice Department, acted as an intermediary for a terminated source for the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe. His task was to deliver to the FBI what Steele told him, which effectively meant the bureau kept Steele as a source.
Agents made a record of each time Ohr gave the bureau information from Steele. Those records are in the form of so-called 302 reports, in which the FBI agents write up notes of interviews during an investigation.

There are a dozen 302 reports on FBI post-election interviews of Ohr. The first was Nov. 22, 2016. After that, the FBI interviewed Ohr on Dec. 5; Dec. 12; Dec. 20; Jan. 23, 2017; Jan. 25; Jan. 27; Feb. 6; Feb. 14; May 8; May 12; and May 15. The dates, previously unreported publicly, were included in a July letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, to the FBI and Justice Department.

Congressional investigators have read the Ohr-Steele 302s. But the FBI has kept them under tight control, insisting they remain classified and limiting access to a few lawmakers and staff. Congress is not allowed to physically possess copies of any of the documents. Now, Grassley says there is “no continuing justification for the FBI to keep the documents secret.” Grassley, who exercises oversight authority over the FBI, is formally challenging the bureau’s decision to keep the Ohr-Steele 302s under wraps. Grassley’s insistence has been met, unsurprisingly, with no cooperation from the FBI.

One small bit of the Ohr 302s has already been made public. The House Intelligence Committee, in its memo focusing on the FBI’s application to the secret FISA court to win a warrant to wiretap onetime Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page, included a 16-word passage from an Ohr 302 in which Ohr described Christopher Steele’s motivation to stop candidate Trump. (Even though Ohr’s interviews with the FBI took place after the election, he apparently described things Steele told him during their contacts in the months before the election, as well as new information.) Here is the relevant portion of the House memo:
Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files — but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.
After the release of the House memo, Sen. Grassley, along with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., wrote to the FBI noting the existence of “numerous FD-302s demonstrating that Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr continued to pass along allegations from Mr. Steele to the FBI after the FBI suspended its formal relationship with Mr. Steele for unauthorized contact with the media, and demonstrating that Mr. Ohr otherwise funneled allegations from Fusion GPS and Mr. Steele to the FBI.”

Grassley also noted other documents of interest: In addition to the 302s, written by the FBI agents who interviewed Ohr, Ohr himself also made notes of his talks with Steele. Those notes, which were never classified, have apparently been given to Congress; in his letter, Grassley referred to “63 pages of unclassified emails and notes documenting Mr. Ohr’s interactions with Mr. Steele.”

Grassley’s argument for declassification of the Ohr-Steele 302s is that the existence of the documents is widely known. Also, some of the material in them has been included in congressional documents and reported in the press. And Ohr’s own notes of the meetings, in the possession of Congress, are not classified. So now, there is no reason for the 302s to remain classified and for the FBI to withhold copies from Congress. The ultimate goal, given Grassley’s statement that there is no reason for the FBI to “keep the documents secret,” is for the public to see them.

What would all of that show? It’s likely that the 302s and notes, if released, would show that the FBI was both still trying to get new information out of Steele after the election and that it was also trying to verify the information Steele had already provided in the dossier installments he handed over in preceding months. Remember, the FBI had already presented some of the dossier’s allegations as evidence to the FISA court. After going out on a limb like that, the bureau wanted to know if the allegations were true or not.

In a larger sense, the Ohr-Steele 302s could shed some light on how an effort — it certainly included Steele, but also others — to keep Trump from being elected morphed into an effort to keep Trump from being inaugurated and then morphed into an effort to remove Trump from office.

A version of that effort at a Coup D’Etat against the United States is of course still going on, even as some representatives in Congress, try to find out how it all got started.


Dr Churchill


“We must never forget that we are revolutionaries, not stooges conscripted to advance a social order of things that kills everybody. Our Revolution of 1776 has to be renewed in the very life of each and every generation of American patriots shedding blood, toil, & tears for our cause — if we are to keep our Republic.” – Dr Churchill


It’s up to us ordinary patriots to pray, protect and support our People’s President and to suffer if needed be in the barricades as we fight the Good Fight against the forces of darkness and evil.

Let’s all pray and stand together patriots because this is the time of grave danger:

Screen Shot 2018-08-11 at 9.40.51 PM

Join me to do just that this September in the Heartland here:

Join “God, Arms, & Covenant, Conference” in Vantage, WA, on September 14th -16th

Friday, Sep 14, 2018, 5:00 PM

Holy Ground Pavilion
551 Main Street Vantage, wa

13 Churchillians Attending

This is the 80th anniversary edition of the “GOD, ARMS, & COVENANT” conference, started by Winston Churchill in 1938 to fight-off the National Socialists, the Defeatists, the Appeasers, the Fascists, and the Atheists, in order to protect the Nation, the Republic, and the Constitution. This is the same situation as the American Churchill faces today…

Check out this Meetup →

Or find yourself starting from here and join up:

God Bless the Patriots and God Bless America!

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Forty Seven
“Who is policing the unaccountable Deep State?”

New information has been released today that indicates Hillary Clinton not only concocted the scheme to destroy Trump, but she also funded and directed via the unethical law firm Perkins Coie and the propaganda shop FusionGPS the creation of the “Fake Opposition Research Dossier” otherwise known as the “Salacious Trump Dossier” full of fake news, imaginary “copromat” and creative writing drivel, that was fully fabricated by fake news manufacturer, ex-British Spy Richard Steele, at Hillary’s behest.

This is the “beauty” that launched the thousand man investigations by the CIA, the NSA, & the FBI, that led to the horrible violations of our laws and of our CONSTITUTION as these corrupt cops engaged in entrapment, sabotage, provocations, spying directly and indirectly within the Trump campaign, within the Trump transition team, and within the offices of the White House Presidency whereas they were found to be illegally wiretapping, installing agents, that supposedly would manage to magically prove some imaginary Russian hoax… and then again magically get rid of our President, via manufactured impeachment process and then magically again bring Queen Hillary back up, and install her in the White House, and make this alternative reality, the story of our lives…

So far we know of at least seven spies, seven times, and seven different instances where Obama and Hillary connected people, tried to set up the Trump campaign’s personnel (knowing that they were being surveilled, wiretapped, and observed by the FBI) in order to get the Trumpsters in compromising situations, and in order to entrap them into some sort of appearance of a Russian connection. That is indeed what they did with the meeting on the Trump tower, and all others…

It is astonishing that already seven different times, seven different spying operations involving seven different Hillary and Obama related operatives, and other assorted murky people — besides Carter Page — have been uncovered as trying to entrap the President of the United States, starting from the time he was a Candidate, continuing while he was in the transition period as President Elect, and on to today that he is the sitting President of this Republic.

Imagine that.

At least seven different spies, people with unethical motives, and all working for Hitlery and that daft stoner Obama, imagining scenarios to bring down the next President. That’s why the whole lot of them now works at Netflix “making up shit” professionally. Obama and his cohorts are now professional liars “imagineers” at NETFLIX, working alongside with the awful human asset and half-ass assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), commonly referred to as the National Security Advisor (NSA)  Susan Rice. Susan Rice and that other awful half human Sally Yates seem to be the organizer brains (?) behind this whole Operatic Magnus Opus of the Obama administration.

What a joke… and all that is supposed to have been done somehow “by the book” as the Stoner-In-Chief Barack Obama ordered his minions to do, and is now being exposed, painfully drip-by-drip, as his legacy of jingoistic chicanery is being dismantled one lie at a time after another. One by one the Obama-Hitlery operatives are also being exposed and are going to be facing justice soonest.

And who knows how many more of these “Gotcha” spies, and “Gotcha” moments, spying and provocateur operations against our President are still going on, or have gone on and are still running, and how many of them still remain unexposed and as of yet maintained and unreported…

And we are not talking now about the seven operatives of the Deep State and the Deep Security apparatus the Seven Agents, Spies, Provocateurs, Obama & Hillary planted people, that pretended to be assistive to the Trump campaign and instead turned out to be what we already know of as paid criminals, turncoats, and assassins of the reputation of our President.

Seven dwarfs representing the Obama Hillary administration dwarfs who sought to diminish the People’s President knowing fully well how their evil doings would be exposed if he were to come to the fore.

And this is when the corrupt chiefs of our vast Security apparatus and their agents tried to entrap the President in the biggest spying operation that has been mounted on the US soil ever in the history of this nation.

That’s how big this spying operation was. And has now come undone and the traitorous US security apparatus agents are being exposed as traitors, along with their leaders — one by one, like Struck and Our, and McCabe and all others like James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, James Brennan, James Clapper and all others who are now preparing to escape to dark and distant places of this earth, that have no extradition treaties with the United States.

This vast domestic and international Spy Apparatus having the full force of the FBI, the CIA, and that of the NSA, and all other “initialed” and non initialed security organizations of the United States — launched the most massive manhunt ever, and yet by the grace of God, this People’s President managed to deflect, escape, and otherwise survive all of those acts of assassination these evil agent provocateurs, sabotage experts, , espionage, propaganda, and compromising provocations that were designed and run like a huge professional spy networks’ most major operation.

Except that they were all barking up the wrong tree…

Or rather all together our Security Apparatus were baying at the moon.

Now, let’s attempt to imagine all the resources that our Security apparatus and our Agencies that are supposedly there to protect us and uphold the Constitution — must have spent on this nonsense. Imagine the manpower and the operative details engaged here. You now this is like  fighting a whole war in the streets of America. Only it is an undeclared war against our own President. A war against ourselves, that Thank God our people have stood valiantly, our country has weathered, and our President has been winning. Except that many victims have fallen to this unjust conflict, because the foot soldiers, and many other high standing ones weren’t so lucky…

Yes, indeed many other patriots were not so lucky, and fell victims to this hysteria, and the Trump hoax that took aim at the heart of this nation. Patriots like General Flynn, and all the others who suffered the consequences of this unprecedented progrom against all Freedom loving Americans and especially against the President’s Men.

And to think that all of that started from a Stoner and an alcoholic hag, and materialized because the DNC and the HILLARY campaign used the “Perkins Coie” unlawful firm, that was joined with propaganda shop “Fusion GPS” into sharing “Judas’ reward” — the 30 pieces of silver — and oiling the machine of the FBI with assigning the investigation into corrupt Cops, like Peter Strzok, Bruce Our, and Rod Rosenstein, whose meeting with the British spy Christopher Steele at the behest of Hillary Clinton started up this whole sordid affair, that we now call SpyGate, and that is detailed in this book of American Horrors perpetuated against our Democracy and against our Republic by the very people that are supposed to protect both our Republic and our Democracy and above all else, our Constitution.

But these details get forgotten when partisanship and corruption have their day at the heads of the Security organizations, like it was with James Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan. And of course, after Peter Strzock, the other shoe to drop at the FBI is Bruce Our, and his wife, who were both found to be working overtime stoking the Russia hoax “fake news” day and night. And this exposes the massive collusion between Bruce Ohr of the FBI and Fake British spy Christopher Steele, sharing fake information from his “Fake Copromat Dossier” with Bruce Ohr, and then Bruce Ohr prompting the FBI to launch the now infamous and massive espionage operation against Donald J Trump’s presidential campaign, code-named “Crossfire Hurricane” that we now all know as SpyGate originating with Hillary Clinton and Obama White House.

Far more corruption has been revealed this past week, that it was ever revealed in the year of Watergate that saw Richard Nixon resign. And yet a whole lot more was revealed this week with the MSM not even raising their voice even a little. Indeed far more information from previously undisclosed FBI head honchos’ texts, telephone records, and email discussions between former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, and former MI6 agent and fake Trump salacious dossier author, Christopher Steele, have now appeared all over the news and the Senate and House investigative committees, because the same investigation that uncovered the notes that Bruce Ohr took summarizing the discussions he had with Christopher Steele’s boss at Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, about the Russia “collusion” investigation, has also uncovered the mountain of corruption at the FBI and the DOJ under Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Seen alone and in isolation, the details revealed in the must-read exposés of this week are beyond troubling. But when considered in conjunction with the information related to the Russia investigation that the US government has previously released, this new information is potentially devastating for the Deep State, because it indicates that, notwithstanding claims to the contrary — the Federal Bureau of Investigation launched the sinister and illegal domestic spying operation against a political opponents of Hillary Clinton. code-named “Crossfire Hurricane” solely based on Steele’s Clinton-ordered and Clinton-funded opposition research, that was creatively composed, in a propaganda manual of “How to take down Donald Trump.”

This conclusion is also proven from the email exchange revealed this week, about Bruce Ohr’s meeting with Christopher Steele on July 30th of 2016. A meeting that took place in a breakfast joint in Washington DC, where Bruce Ohr brought his wife Nellie Ohr, to the breakfast gathering to cooperate with Steele, and get their stories straight because Ohr’s wife Nellie, was also working at the propaganda shop Fusion GPS, and had specifically worked on compiling the Trump opposition-research project paper that is now known as Fake Copromat made in America, instead of made in Russia.

Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 2.44.27 PM

That end-of-July meeting followed emails exchanged earlier in the month, in which Christopher Steele often wrote to Bruce Ohr: “There is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!”

“Business tycoon” is an apparent reference to Donald J Trump, and it was used whenever the ex-British spy Christopher Steele was reaching out to Bruce Ohr, just days before Christopher Steele met with another FBI agent stationed in Rome to relay fake news allegations that Trump had an improper relationship with Russia, including possible efforts to hijack the presidential election.

While we do not know the details discussed at the July 30, 2016, tête-à-tête, the morning meeting with the Ohrs appears related to Steele’s request to chat about their “favourite business tycoon” and it is significant to note that the meeting of Bruce and Lisa Ohr with Christopher Steele, occurred exactly one day before the FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok formally opened an investigation, dubbed Crossfire Hurricane, into whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Moscow to steal the election.

This meeting raises serious questions concerning whether Steele shared information from his “dossier” with Bruce Ohr, which Ohr then passed on to the FBI head James Comey, prompting the FBI to launch Crossfire Hurricane. This possibility seems extremely likely, given two additional facts.

First, the FBI’s proffered rationale for initiating Crossfire Hurricane has long seemed shaky. According to Democratic representative Adam Schiff part of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Democratic response memorandum: “the FBI initiated its counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016, after receiving information that individuals linked to Russia had told George Papadopoulos they could assist Trump’s presidential campaign by anonymously releasing information about Hillary Clinton.”

Adam Schiff’s memo redacted the details of the information the FBI received concerning Papadopoulos’ purported conversation with the Russians. But The New York Times reported in May 2018 that, according to officials speaking “on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the investigation publicly,” it was comments Papadopoulos made to Australian diplomat Alexander Downer over drinks in a London bar in May 2016 that prompted the FBI to launch Crossfire Hurricane.

The New York Times further reported that Papadopoulos had told Downer “that Russia had dirt on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton,” and implied the “dirt” consisted of the hacked DNC emails, writing, “Before hacked Democratic emails appeared online, he had seemed to know that Russia had political dirt on Mrs. Clinton.”

However, in an interview with the newspaper “The Australian” Hillary connected and big time donor to Clinton Global Initiative corrupt outfit — ambassador Downer said that “during their drink at the Kensington Wine Room, Mr Papadopoulos told him that he had damaging information on Mrs. Clinton, but he did not reveal what it was.” As Downer put it: “He didn’t say dirt, he said material that could be damaging to her. No, he said it would be damaging. He didn’t say what it was.” Rather, “During that conversation, Papadopoulos mentioned the Russians might use material that they have on Hillary Clinton in the lead-up to the election, which may be damaging.”

This is reading into what Papadopoulos had said, and yet while Papadopoulos would later mention “dirt” and “emails” when the FBI interviewed him in late January 2017 — at the time the FBI launched the investigation in July 2016, agents would only have Downer’s version of the events, which, according to the former Australian diplomat, made no reference to emails — either the Democratic National Committee’s hacked ones or the 30,000 emails missing from Clinton’s homebrew server.

Yet the narrative goes that the former Trump advisor’s comments justified an investigation into the Trump campaign once WikiLeaks released the hacked DNC emails in late July 2016, because Papadopoulos had obviously known ahead of time that Russia had that “dirt” on Hillary.

Taken in isolation, this theory is a tough sell, but now that we know that Steele met with Ohr the day before the FBI launched Crossfire Hurricane, no one should be buying the bureau’s bull. Unlike Papadopoulos’ vague reference to damaging material, Steele had already authored several memos — including at least two from July 2016 that purported to connect the Trump campaign to the WikiLeaks release of the DNC emails.

For instance, one memo claimed “Source E, acknowledged that the Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the WikiLeaks platform.” Steele’s memo continued: “The reason for using WikiLeaks was ‘plausible deniability’ and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of TRUMP and senior members of his campaign team.”

Then in a memo dated July 30th of 2016, Steele wrote that the Kremlin was “concerned that political fallout from DNC e-mail hacking operation [was] spiraling out of control,” and was “keen to cool [the] situation and maintain ‘plausible deniability’ of existing/ongoing pro-TRUMP and anti-CLINTON operations.”

From the current reporting we now have proof that Ohr fed information from Steele to the FBI after the FBI had dismissed Steele as a Confidential Human Source (CHS). The question is whether Ohr also funneled information from Steele to the FBI before the launch of Crossfire Hurricane and, if so, whether Steele’s statements brought about Crossfire Hurricane.

Yet Adam Schiff in his memo, has said exactly the opposite, and this point is significant because in his Democratic party’s response memo, Adam Schiff states unequivocally that Steele had nothing to do with the decision to launch Crossfire Hurricane: “Christopher Steele’s raw intelligence reporting did not inform the FBI’s decision to initiate its counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016.” Schiff reiterated this point a second time, stressing that Steele’s reporting “played no role in launching the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Russian interference and links to the Trump campaign.”

Schiff, however, only knows what the FBI included in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act application or disclosed to congressional oversight committees. With every new revelation, it becomes more and more apparent that the FBI was less than forthright with both the FISA court and Congress.

At least Congress will have a chance to explore these issues with Ohr, as the House Oversight Committee has scheduled a closed-door session for August 28th of 2018, in order to question Mr Bruce Ohr about his illicit contacts with fake British spy Christopher Steele.

Hopefully, when the time comes the committee will focus on both Ohr’s role following Steele’s removal as a CHS and whether the former MI6 spy played a part in the decision to launch the illegal sting and entrapment wiretapping and spying operation “Crossfire Hurricane” against the political opponent of Hilary Clinton. This was an illegal and unconstitutional move to spy on an opposition candidate utilizing all the resources of the Federal Government’s Security apparatus to entrap and shut down a Presidential Candidate only so that the Democratic party successor could win in order to carry out his policies unchallenged and unchanged.

This much corruption and totalitarian action is unprecedented in the American Democratic system of choosing the Presidents in our Republic via popular vote and not through some back room dealings even if these deal were crafted inside the smoky rooms of the last resident of the White House, who was known for getting stoned with the frequency of a Seattle high schooler. So the “fully baked” Obama administration conspired with the fully alcoholic Hillary hag to steal the US elections.

What on earth could possibly go wrong … ?

Still we now know that the flimsiest excuse and the fig leaf for this spying operation was provided by the fake British spy Mr Christopher Steele, who on the behest of Hillary Clinton fabricated some salacious Russian fantasy that can be used as the excuse to spy, entrap, and wiretap the Trump campaign, and to stick human intel assets (stool pigeons, and Gestapo snitches, within it, in order to attempt an entrapment of the whole campaign, and destroy the People’s Choice for President of the United States.

This was a Hillary Clinton operation unfolding in it’s entirety, as all things Hillary does — like a Clinton BJ gone horribly wrong…


Dr Churchill


This is how THE HILL reported these recent developments in an article written by John Solomon on 8-7-18 and published last week.

By John Solomon
Opinion Contributor

Hundreds of pages of previously unreported emails and memos provide the clearest evidence yet that a research firm, hired by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to find dirt on and defeat Donald Trump, worked early and often with the FBI, a Department of Justice (DOJ) official and the intelligence community during the 2016 presidential election and the early days of Trump’s presidency.

Fusion GPS’s work and its involvement with several FBI officials have been well reported.

But a close review of these new documents shows just how closely Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, who reported to Obama-era Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, maintained contact with Fusion — and, in particular, its primary source, former British spy Christopher Steele — before, during and after the election.

Yates was fired by President Trump over an unrelated political dispute. Ohr was demoted recently.

Ohr’s own notes, emails and text messages show he communicated extensively with Steele and with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson. Those documents have been turned over in recent weeks to investigative bodies in Congress and the DOJ, but not reviewed outside the investigative ranks until now.

They show Ohr had contact with Steele in the days just before the FBI opened its Trump-Russia probe in summer 2016, and then engaged Steele as a “confidential human source” assisting in that probe.

They also confirm that Ohr later became a critical conduit of continuing information from Steele after the FBI ended the Brit’s role as an informant.

“B, doubtless a sad and crazy day for you re- SY,” Steele texted Ohr on Jan. 31, 2017, referencing President Trump’s firing of Sally Yates for insubordination.

Steele’s FBI relationship had been terminated about three months earlier. The bureau concluded on Nov. 1, 2016, that he leaked information to the news media and was “not suitable for use” as a confidential source, memos show.

The FBI specifically instructed Steele that he could no longer “operate to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI,” those memos show.

Yet, Steele asked Ohr in the Jan. 31 text exchange if he could continue to help feed information to the FBI: “Just want to check you are OK, still in the situ and able to help locally as discussed, along with your Bureau colleagues.”

“I’m still here and able to help as discussed,” Ohr texted back. “I’ll let you know if that changes.”

Steele replied, “If you end up out though, I really need another (bureau?) contact point/number who is briefed. We can’t allow our guy to be forced to go back home. It would be disastrous.” Investigators are trying to determine who Steele was referring to.

FBI officials now admit they continued to receive information from Steele through Ohr, identifying more than a half-dozen times its agents interviewed Ohr in late 2016 and 2017, to learn what Steele was saying.

That continued reliance on Steele after his termination is certain to raise interest in Congress about whether the FBI broke its own rules.

But the memos also raise questions about Ohr’s and the Justice Department’s roles in the origins of building a counterintelligence case against the Republican presidential nominee, based heavily on opposition research funded by his rival’s campaign, the DNC and the DNC’s main law firm, Perkins Coie.

Some of the more tantalizing Ohr contacts occurred in the days when Steele made his first contacts with the FBI in summer 2016 about the Russia matter.

“There is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!” Steele wrote Ohr on July 1, 2016, in an apparent reference to Trump.

That overture came just four days before Steele walked into the FBI office in Rome with still-unproven allegations that Trump had an improper relationship with Russia, including possible efforts to hijack the presidential election.

Ohr scheduled a call with Steele over Skype a few days later. But then the two men met in Washington on July 30, 2016, at the Mayflower Hotel.

Ohr brought his wife, Nellie, who was working at Fusion GPS on the Trump-Russia research project.

“Great to see you and Nellie this morning Bruce,” Steele wrote shortly after their breakfast meeting. “Let’s keep in touch on the substantive issues/s (sic). Glenn is happy to speak to you on this if it would help.”

That meeting occurred exactly one day before FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok formally opened an investigation, dubbed Crossfire Hurricane, into whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Moscow to steal the election.

At the time, the case was based mostly on an Australian diplomat’s tip that Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos appeared to know in advance that the Russians possessed information involving Hillary Clinton before hacked documents were released on WikiLeaks.

Soon, the case expanded to include allegations that another Trump adviser, Carter Page, might have ties to Russia — an uncorroborated allegation from Fusion GPS’s research now known as the “Steele dossier.”

Calendar notations and handwritten notes indicate Ohr followed up on Steele’s offer and met with Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016. Ohr’s notes indicate Simpson identified several “possible intermediaries” between the Trump campaign and Russia.

One was identified as a “longtime associate of Trump” who “put together several real estate deals for Russian investigators to purchase Trump properties.” Another was a Russian apparently tied to Carter Page, Ohr’s note of his Simpson contact indicated.

Steele offered Ohr many other theories over their contacts, including a now widely discredited one that the Russian Alfa Bank had a computer server “as a link” to the Trump campaign, Ohr’s notes show.

Though much of Steele’s information remained uncorroborated, the FBI nonetheless took the extraordinary step in October 2016 of seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to monitor Carter Page during the final days of the election, based mostly on Steele’s dossier. The warrant was renewed at least three times, but Carter Page was never charged.

Ohr’s connections to Steele are significant because at least one of the FISA warrants was approved by Ohr’s boss, Yates.

By early November 2016, Steele was terminated for unauthorized media contacts — and the FBI was turning to Ohr as a back channel to Steele.

Ohr’s notes suggest he met Nov. 21, 2016, with FBI officials that included Strzok, then-FBI attorney Lisa Page and another agent. Strzok and Lisa Page have become the poster children for Republicans who believe the FBI abused its authority by investigating Trump on flimsy evidence. FBI records confirm an interview with Ohr around that time.

Ohr’s notes from that meeting indicate that FBI officials told him they “may go back to Chris” — an apparent reference to Steele — just 20 days after dismissing him.

In all, Ohr’s notes, emails and texts identify more than 60 contacts with Steele and/or Simpson, some dating to 2002 in London. But the vast majority occurred during the 2016-2017 timeframe that gave birth to one of the most controversial counterintelligence probes in recent American history.

Most importantly, the new memos make clear that Ohr, a man whose name was barely uttered during the first 18 months of the scandal, may have played a critical role in stitching together a Democratic opposition research project and the top echelons of the FBI and DOJ.

Representatives for the Justice Department and FBI did not return calls Tuesday seeking comment. A message left on the cell phone for Bruce and Nellie Ohr, seeking comment, was not returned.

John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal scientists’ misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption.


“Life has given to humankind no sharper spur to victory than contempt of death.” – Hannibal Barca

Posted by: Dr Churchill | August 14, 2018

SpyGate (Chapter Forty Six)


This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Forty Six
“Please Impeach my pup, my ex-girfriend, and my kitty cat”

Screen Shot 2018-08-14 at 8.44.45 PM

Sessions should get his bearings straight to step-up and stop Mueller’s Russian collusion probe; according to President Donald Trump who called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to shut down special counsel Robert Mueller’s never ending investigation, this Wednesday afternoon. Of course this Tweet prompted the president’s legal team to try to manage the expectations and perhaps address the issue in legal terms…

President Donald J Trump had this to say in a series of tweets: “This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this rigged Witch-Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!”

Trump’s personal lawyers quickly sought to downplay his comments, calling them an expression of his personal opinion — not an order to Sessions to fire Mueller, that potentially could be misinterpreted and could plunge the country into a divisive political and constitutional tug of war. Tug of war, as in Civil War. And the Justice Department indicated it would take no action based on Trump’s Twitter venting since it is obviously a form of therapeutic venting for the President to express himself directly to his people, and to inform the American Public of his views directly.

“We have been saying for months that it is time to bring this inquiry to an end,” Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani said. “The president has expressed the same opinion.”

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders Wednesday afternoon said Trump’s tweet was not an order, rather it was the “president’s opinion.”

“The president is not obstructing, he’s fighting back,” Sanders said. “The president has stated his opinion, he’s stating it clearly. He is certainly expressing the frustration he has with the level of corruption that we’ve seen from people like James Comey, Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe.”

“There’s a reason the president is angry and frankly, most of America is angry as well and there is no reason he shouldn’t be able to voice that opinion,” she said.

Giuliani later echoed that sentiment, saying Trump didn’t issue a presidential directive because “he used the word should, he didn’t use the word must.”

He added that Trump is “not going to direct” Sessions to squash the probe.

But Democratic lawmakers ripped the president’s comments, which they called a blatant attempt to obstruct Mueller’s ongoing investigation — which has already netted 25 indictments of Russians for interfering in the 2016 election, as well as guilty pleas from three former campaign aides to Trump. His former campaign chairman Paul Manafort has also been indicted for tax fraud and money laundering and is facing the first of two trials this month.

“The president of the United States just called on his attorney general to put an end to an investigation in which the president, his family and campaign may be implicated,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. “This is an attempt to obstruct justice hiding in plain sight. America must never accept it.”

Maine Sen. Susan Collins, one of a few Republicans who have publicly criticized Trump’s aggressive rhetoric about the Mueller probe, told reporters Wednesday that “Jeff Sessions does not even have the authority to fire Robert Mueller. He has recused himself, and appropriately so.

“I don’t think there’s any chance at all that Mr. Mueller is going to be fired,” Collins added. “And it would be far better if the president just refrained from commenting, and Mr. Mueller proceeds with his investigation — which, after all, has already resulted in more than 30 indictments, including Russian nationals, and has led to a trial that is ongoing even as we speak.”

House Republicans, who have departed Washington for a five-week recess, largely stayed silent following Trump’s tirade, which also included a tweet distancing himself from Manafort.

The president has consistently disparaged Mueller’s Russia investigation, calling it a “witch hunt,” but he had not yet asked Sessions directly to call it off. He has, however, strongly criticized Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia probe, which is now overseen by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

While Trump and his allies have repeatedly highlighted donations that members of Mueller’s team of prosecutors have made to Democrats, top FBI and DOJ officials have emphasized that they don’t screen personnel based on political views — and many of Mueller’s prosecutors are seasoned law enforcement veterans. Mueller himself is a Republican.

Screen Shot 2018-08-09 at 6.00.10 PM

Trump also appears to have recalibrated the number of “angry Democrats” he claims are working for Mueller. While he’s consistently railed against 13, he upped the figure to 17 for his Wednesday morning tweet.

This is not the first time someone in Trump’s circle has called for the probe to end. Brad Parscale, Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign manager, in June tweeted that the president should fire Sessions and end Mueller’s investigation.

“You can’t obstruct something that was phony against you,” Parscale wrote in a tweet.

The Senate Judiciary Committee this spring approved a bipartisan bill designed to shield Mueller from any attempted firing, but it did not appear that Trump’s Wednesday outburst would lend any new momentum to legislation that GOP leaders have described as unnecessary. Collins suggested that the bill might be brought to the floor “to send a message to Mr. Mueller that he has strong support in Congress,” but one of its chief Republican authors was unruffled by Trump’s tweet and reiterated that the special counsel’s investigation should “play out.”

The Mueller protection bill’s advancement, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) told reporters, “was never because I thought there was an immediate threat to Mueller. It’s something I think we should have in place for all future special counsels.”

The president throughout the morning also continued to criticized the investigation, calling it a “total hoax” by Democrats who paid for a “phony” dossier. Trump specifically called out former FBI director James Comey, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, in addition to Peter Strzok, an FBI agent, and Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer, who exchanged anti-Trump texts with each other. He placed particular emphasis on Page, who reportedly had an affair with Strzok, referring to her as “[Strzok’s] lover, the lovely Lisa Page.”

Republicans on Capitol Hill who interviewed Page last month largely praised her as forthcoming and cooperative.

The dossier to which Trump referred contained salacious accusations against the president and was compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. Some information in it has been discredited or has yet to be confirmed.

It is unclear as to what prompted Trump’s tweets Wednesday. Fox News, however, mentioned Manafort’s trial during its 8 a.m. block. It’s the first trial connected to Mueller’s Russia probe, though Manafort is not accused of wrongdoing tied to the 2016 campaign. In addition, Fox News over the past couple of days has featured Alan Dershowitz, retired Harvard law professor and one Trump’s defenders.

Trump tweeted a quote by Dershowitz during his series of tweets.

Dershowitz, who has criticized Mueller’s investigation, on Tuesday spoke with Fox News host Tucker Carlson about the Manafort trial, saying that it was just a way for Mueller to get to Trump.

“This trial is not about Manafort,” Dershowitz said.

Judge Ellis the judge on the trial agreed, and spoke sharply to the Manafort prosecutors about their witch hunt being a wrong headed move.

“It’s an attempt to convict him of whatever they possibly can find against him, no matter how unrelated it is to the Mueller probe, in order to squeeze him to get him to sing and maybe even compose” he said, adding that Manafort will become “creative” and “make up information” in order to then make a favorable deal that will allow him to get little or no jail time.

And that sets the stage for some more interesting discussions ahead such as when former congressman Barry Goldwater Jr. (R-Calif.) spoke to hundreds of conservative students this afternoon at Young America’s Foundation’s 40th annual National Conservative Student Conference, on the power struggle of politics and the classic struggle that dates all the way back to Jefferson and Hamilton.

Screen Shot 2018-08-14 at 8.37.00 PM

The struggle of where the power will lie still goes on today, this stretches all the way back to Jefferson and Hamilton and we see it again manifested in the economic struggle between Milton Friedman and Keynesian economics. Today we see this manifested in left vs. right, conservative vs. liberal and MSNBC vs. Fox News.

In 2010 the energy of the Tea Party movement energized the base, and the movement still possesses the energy which gives us a recipe for success in 2018.

Goldwater Jr. recalled serving with his father when his father served as a senator. “We didn’t get together on too many pieces of legislation, but I remember one we worked together on The Privacy Act of 1974.” Here we see the political divide and power struggle manifested even within this politically iconic family.

Goldwater recalled how Dwight D. Eisenhower manifested the principles of both liberals and conservatives. “Before you can distribute, you have to take. Government really makes nothing,” said Goldwater.

“Freedom, not government has created this great country,” said Goldwater.

His father, Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-AZ.), had “become a voice of liberty, and along with Reagan launched the conservative movement that is being carried with by the Young America’s Foundation. Ron Robinson, I take my hat off to you. I look out here and I see the future leaders of America.”

Goldwater Jr. did not shy away from taking a hardline stance of current issues which are hotly contested, illegal immigration and family separation among them and he went on to state this: .

“I think the reason we are moving so far left is because of all the illegal immigrants that are coming in from California and New York. It just points out that freedom is very attractive and people like doing business where there is less regulation.”

“America is being moved more to the left of the classic struggle between Jefferson and Hamilton. That is the challenge that we face in the next election. Are we up for the challenge? I say the answer is yes.”

He then asked: “Are you with me?”

“I think we can win this election if we want to.”

In other news, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper will be called to testify again on Capitol Hill, because the issue now has become the following:
“How can Americans now trust the intelligence agencies shown to be corrupt in the very recent past?”

And of course, no doubt — Russia must be watched for its chronic efforts to sow more chaos in American elections — despite Barack Obama’s naïve assertion in 2016 that no entity could possibly ever rig a U.S. election, given the decentralization of state voting.

Lately the heads of four U.S. intelligence and security agencies — Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, FBI Director Chris Wray, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, National Security Agency Director Paul Nakasone, and National Security Adviser John Bolton — held coordinated White House press conferences to remind America of the dangers of Russian chicanery. Trump, who is prone to conflate documented Russian efforts to meddle and cause chaos with unproven accusations of Trump-Russia collusion, should heed their warnings and beef up U.S. counter-espionage efforts and cyber deterrence.

But why do our intelligence heads seem to feel so exasperated that they’re not getting through to the American people? Why do they need to reassert the immediacy of the Russian threat?

The FBI joined forces with one political campaign to thwart the efforts of the opposing campaign. Has that happened before in American history?
Is it because Trump has poisoned the waters of American espionage and surveillance by his understandable furor over the never-ending Mueller investigation and his perceived downplaying of “Russian meddling”?

Not really.

Consider the larger context.

Most recently, it was disclosed, two years after the fact — and despite the FBI’s kicking-and-screaming refusal to release subpoenaed documents — that the FBI did, as alleged, offer to pay Christopher Steele to dig for dirt on the Trump campaign.

The FBI also knew that Steele was working on behalf of the Clinton campaign to find dirt on Donald Trump. We now also know that the FBI used at least one informant to spy on members of the Trump campaign. In other words, the FBI joined forces with one political campaign to thwart the efforts of the opposing campaign. Has that happened before in American history?

Pause for a minute and examine the recent history of the FBI leadership. The fired former director James Comey likely lied frequently to congressional committees when he claimed that the Steele dossier was not really a primary source for the FISA court writ against Carter Page.

Comey did write an FBI summary about the Clinton email scandal, exonerating Clinton, before he interviewed Hillary Clinton and many of the major figures in that scandal. Comey leaked at least one likely classified document, written on FBI equipment on FBI time, in a successful gambit to get a special counsel appointed, which turned out to be his friend Robert Mueller.

Comey misled a FISA judge by not fully disclosing the full origins of the Steele dossier as a product of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. He also deceived a president by briefing him of selected bits of the dossier’s contents, but not informing the president that the source of most of that information was paid by the Clinton campaign.

Comey further misled the president by assuring him that he was not a subject of an FBI investigation while he repeatedly suggested to the media that Trump, in fact, was a subject.

In addition, Comey must have known that DOJ official Bruce Ohr — even after the election — served as a likely conduit to the FBI for info passed to Ohr by then-fired FBI informant Christopher Steele.

In other words, during the Trump presidency, one of his own top officials at the DOJ was secretly working with the FBI to undermine the Trump presidency.

Andrew McCabe, Comey’s deputy, was fired for misleading or lying to federal investigators. He oversaw the email investigation of Clinton, only months after Clinton’s associated PACs had provided most of the funds for the political campaign of McCabe’s wife.

Other FBI operatives, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, were fired from the Mueller investigation for unethical and unprofessional behavior — as well as for rampant bias shown against the target of their own investigations.

The CIA under Brennan apparently was knee-deep in efforts to push the FBI to monitor the Trump campaign, despite the fact that domestic surveillance is beyond the CIA’s legal mandate.
An entire array of FBI agents and associated DOJ officials — James Baker, Peter Kazdik, Michael Kortan, David Laufman, Andrew McCabe, Bruce Ohr, Lisa Page, James Rybicki, Peter Strzok, and Sally Yates — have now mysteriously either resigned, retired, been reassigned, or been fired for allegedly unethical or perhaps even illegal behavior. And we still do not know the full extent of the FBI’s use of spies implanted in the Trump campaign…

Screen Shot 2018-08-14 at 1.03.34 PM

Currently, congressional committees are likely to reinvestigate former CIA director John Brennan for serial false testimonies. Brennan has already lied under oath to Congress about the drone program, CIA monitoring of Senate staff computers, and his own role in seeding the Steele dossier to a senator and to DOJ and FBI officials. The CIA under Brennan apparently was knee-deep in efforts to push the FBI to monitor the Trump campaign, despite the fact that domestic surveillance is beyond the CIA’s legal mandate.

Members of the Obama NSC requested a record number of unmaskings of names associated with FISA surveillance. Many of the names of those surveilled were illegally leaked to the press. Former national-security adviser Susan Rice initially lied about her own role in such roguery and then awkwardly admitted it while insisting it was entirely proper and routine.

We also still do not know the full extent of incompetence, wrongdoing, or simple conflicts of interest of our intelligence and investigatory agencies in the Clinton email and Uranium One scandals.

The DOJ is hardly better than the intelligence agencies. Some DOJ officials signed misleading FISA warrants that they knew were not fully transparent. Attorney General Loretta Lynch improperly and secretly met with Bill Clinton while her agency was investigating Hillary Clinton. DOJ deputy Bruce Ohr may well have monitored and coordinated the spread of the Steele dossier to hurt the campaign of Donald Trump and then President Trump — and then hidden the fact that his wife had been hired to aid Steele. Rod Rosenstein did not recuse himself from overseeing the Mueller investigation of Trump, although he was a key overseer of investigations into the Uranium One and Clinton email scandals, the FISA requests, and the collusion allegations.

In addition, “many people in the State Department were also meeting with Christopher Steele,” Devin Nunes said in a recent interview with Fox News’s Laura Ingraham. “What on earth was Christopher Steele doing meeting with State Department officials?” The congressional oversight committee that Nunes heads is now interviewing many of these officials to determine why and how they were involved with the Steele dossier.

In sum, many within the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSC, and the State Department may have been involved in the greatest scandal in American electoral history, by directing agents, informants, and employees to help one campaign to harm another — and then, even after the election, to work to undermine a sitting president. In addition, these rogue agencies spent two years fighting congressional requests to release incriminating information. And then, when they were forced against their will to cough up some documents, they redacted them so heavily that they’re almost undecipherable.

Former FBI director Comey spent months on a book tour, punctuated by daily back-and-forth feuding with the president of the United States. Former CIA director John Brennan is a current paid CNN analyst who devotes much of his commentary to calling the president treasonous and unfit. Former director of national intelligence James Clapper is a paid MSNBC consultant who has alleged that the president is a Russian intelligence asset.

So let us recontextualize the intelligence agencies’ current dilemmas.

Our current agency directors and cabinet are rightly calling universal attention to the ongoing threat of Russian espionage efforts.

They do so in concert because they are apparently worried, though they cannot say such openly, that President Trump himself and the American public are not yet sufficiently woke to these existential threats from Russia.

Such concern for the national security is fine and necessary.

But somewhere, somehow, someone must also must explain and rectify the past. For two years, the top employees of these agencies, most appointed during the Obama administration, have been engaged in unethical and illegal behavior, likely intended to throw the election to President Obama’s preferred candidate and then, after the election, to subvert the new presidency.

In other words, those who are warning of Russian collusion efforts to warp an election now work for agencies that in the recent past were doing precisely what they now rightly accuse the Russians of doing. The damage that Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and others have done to the reputations of the agencies they ran will live on well after their tenures are over.

The public will not be able to square such a circle — believe that the intelligence agencies are trustworthy now, while knowing they were deeply corrupt in the very recent past — unless there is some accountability for U.S.-government misdeeds.

We always expect Russian skullduggery, but we never anticipated election interference from those entrusted with protecting us.
For some reason, many still in the current FBI, CIA, DOJ, NSC, and State Deprtment are incapable of accepting that their agencies in the Obama years were weaponized to alter a U.S. election and were directed to do so by many top dogs in their Washington hierarchies.

Until we get the truth, an accounting, and some sort of justice, we will not quite become galvanized by those who rightly warn us of real Russian interference.

Screen Shot 2018-08-11 at 10.31.29 PM

The reason?

We always expect Russian skullduggery, but we never anticipated election interference from those entrusted with protecting us and our institutions from our enemies.

The police were not policed — and so became like the enemies they warned us about.


Dr Churchill


“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. ”
– Theodore Roosevelt

Screen Shot 2018-08-08 at 9.46.03 AM

Posted by: Dr Churchill | August 1, 2018

SpyGate (Chapter Forty Five)

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Forty Five
“Obama’s extraordinary rats, and rascals”

The general evil doing of people like Bob Mueller, Hillary, Rod Rosenstein, and James Comey, is unalloyed evidence of the legacy of Obimbo, that brought all these animated characters to life and also brought about the slow walking Coup D’Etat that they re attempting to use to destroy our Republic.

Just look at these morons lusting after power as they celebrate tying the American Republic in knots right after disgraced dirty cop Bob Mueller was appointed Special Councel on the Russia collusion inquiry by Rod Rosenstein right after scardy cat pvssy-boy, Jeff Sessions recused himself…. and allowed the guy who counseled President Trump to fire James Comey — start an investigation of the President based on what himself had suggested to the President to do.

Amazing and that is why you have all these happy dirty faces here:

Screen Shot 2018-07-30 at 10.42.13 AM

So if you ever wondered what Obama’s intent was for “fundamentally transforming the United States” look no further than the people he appointed and who are still leading the delusional Coup D’Etat that seeks to lead our country towards an “Uncivil”  and rather bloody Civil War.

Trust me — I know.

I know because I have been an early victim, a casualty and a survivor of this Civil War that already ravages our country as a low level conflict burning hot like a coal mine fire…

It has come to pass, that though there are very many and great issues facing our great nation, for far too many on today’s left, nothing is of greater importance than matters that impact their efforts at “several people coupling together in bed.”

Like the Epicureans centuries ago, modern liberals have concluded that humanity’s highest good is achieved in physical pleasure — especially sex.

If this wasn’t clear before the election of Donald Trump, no less than the day after President Trump took office, Hillary’s hedonists made sure we understood what really matters to those who, as Augustine put it, “wish to live after the flesh.”

Do you recall the “March of the Nasty Women?”

Or maybe you might have seen the so called “P*ssy Riot” in Washington DC in early 2017?

Whatever designation you prefer, on January 21, 2017 hundreds of thousands of vagina-obsessed fools paraded around D.C. wearing their vagina pink hats. They displayed their vulgar posters, and again reminded most everyone in America and around the world, why Donald Trump won the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

And they continue to remind us of that today and every day.

Do you remember the Podesta brothers’ “pedophilia” parties?

Do you recall Michelle and Barack Obama’s insistence on cramming as many people as possible into the young people’s bathrooms regardless of sexual orientation?

Whether demanding that men be allowed into women’s restrooms, that girls be allowed into boys’ clubs, the Left showcase their twisted logic. Understandably, boys now are allowed to take trophies from girls in girl competitions, girl scouts must now include boys and vice versa, lizzies, LGBTQ, leftists, and Muslim islamists — altogether now demand that we fix homosexual infertility. And the terrorists who want to destroy American society form within they demand the same… but in their home shithole country they keep throwing the gays down from the roof, or if in the village they half bury them and throw stones on their head to kill them and often bury them alive.

But in America all these evil incarnate fools have banded together to march with pink pvssy hats on. Terrorists of civility and enemies of reason — are all now united and marching off the cliff like lemurs on a mission to self destruct.

Screen Shot 2018-08-01 at 9.59.12 AM

Good on them, but if the leftist socialist liberal DemonRats don’t mind the rapes of minors in the school bathrooms, the molestation of the young at the hands of the Transgender folks, or the unwanted pregnancies, and the rampant STDs, and the sick celebration of such sickness, the removal of the criminal statue for passing along AIDS to unsuspecting sex partners, the rampant pornography use, the girls with penises (chicks with dicks), little boys as drag queens, and offer drag queen story time. And if that’s not enough they promote the debasement of children, they bully, they normalize pedophilia, and they celebrate bestiality.

Since the only way that gay people reproduce is by creating more homosexuals through molestation and turning healthy young children into sick adults via their sexual perversion foisted upon them at an early age through sodomy — society has to take measures to prevent pedophilia;

Yet will all the government institutions, the churches and all the schools covering up their own crimes, and turning a blind eye, under the orders of sicko Obimbo, and Hillary’s campaign manger Podesta wanting to make Sodomy, the national sport — we are in for a giant fight.

Then, whether killing children in the womb, or legally redefining the oldest institution in the history of humanity, leftist socialist liberals have time and again demonstrated themselves to be firmly entrenched in what’s called by St Augustine “The City of Man.”

In his historic and magnificent work, “City of God” St Augustine declares that there are two kinds of human society. The one consists of those who wish to live after the flesh, and engage in debauchery, sodomy, and evil, as in the city of Sodoma & Gomorrah, and thus reside in “The City of Man.” And the other kind of humans are those who wish to live after the Spirit, and in an ethical manner, with family & community values, and they choose to reside in what he called as “The City of God.”

Though St Augustine was clear that the “works of the flesh” are not merely sexual in nature, he also makes clear that those who are slaves to sexual lust cannot occupy “the City of God.”

Proof of where we are going is the slavery to lust that produces advertisements for the New York City federally funded Planned Parenthood, entitled “Protect Our Freedom to Fvck.”

As a matter of fact, this ad is just too vulgar to hear, and see, but for fact finding purposes I will provide a link here. See & hear, at your own peril, because that advert says a lot about who we have allowed ourselves to become as a Society:

The title alone [“Fvck New York and Everyone In It”] coupled with the knowledge that the ad comes from the organization Planned Parenthood, the staunchest proponents and providers of abortions (with 60 million murdered American babies since Roe V Wade), should be enough for any discerning person to understand just how vulgar this ad is.

However, LifeSite News provides a good description, noting “it’s a surreal blend of slavish adherence to the current politically correct orthodoxy, and a complete surrender to senseless vulgarity.”

Like the “nasty” women’s march, virtually any Hollywood award show, or most every AntiFa, Democratic party, or Black Lives Matter gathering, the outrageous Planned Parenthood ad is just another ugly liberal temper tantrum. This time the fit was in response to President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Here are some other meltdowns over Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination:

Why the ugly outrage over the courts?

Because what the court has given, the court can take away.

And for decades, the courts have been a great ally to liberals and their agenda — an invaluable ally, especially on their wicked sexual agenda. Indeed, most all of the angry hysterics over President Trump’s nomination of Judge Kavanaugh have been driven by the fear that courts will take away the legal cover they’ve long provided for abortion and the perverse LGBT agenda.

Screen Shot 2018-07-30 at 8.47.17 AM

And that is largely why depraved sodomites, and sad-sack individuals like James Comey, and Robert Mueller, have conspired with the rest of Gay Mafia of Podesta and Co who all together are ruling the globalist leftist democrat deep state swamp, of Washington DC politics — have all now come together to attack, delegitimize, and impeach the righteous President Donald J Trump.

Of course, because such legal matters would be in the hands of the states, state legislators and state voters — where they always belonged — a reversal of judicial made laws, like the Roe V Wade, Obergefell, and other judgements like that, would do little to eliminate abortion and sexual perversion from our states, from our nation, or from our culture.

Things simply would just revert to the past state of being in a Madisonian State Rights regime, where the exclusive choice of the People, for the people, and from the people — arises in each and every state as need be.

Thus, whatever the result of Kavanaugh’s ascension to the Supreme Court, our battles in these grave matters will continue on unabated at the places that matter the local State community politics where people know each other and can really politicize the debates and may the best reasonable arguments win, and the best reasonable representatives may win — to chart a path to acceptable State policies on this matter of vast importance for our future.

However, leftist demented democrat liberals don’t see it this way.

Instead, they see any reversal by the Supreme Court of any tenet of their misperceived “highest good” as an attack on their “right” to rule the world. Their need for control, of which they have none over their personal lustful desires, addictions, and sodomite aberrant behavior, is is really the heart of the matter in our moral battles, and our cultural wars.

As for their lust for power is best described as totalitarian and legendary. No Democracy perceptions here after the liberals.

Thus, the question before us is this: Should we live according to our own rules and laws, or is there a higher standard to which we are held personally accountable and upon which our human laws should rest?

Instead of one who lives “after the flesh” a more apt description of an inhabitant of the City of Man is that which St Augustine also employs, and is the one who “lives according to himself” or the one who wants the “freedom” to rule his own world.

St Augustine notes that this makes mankind live like the devil did. “For the devil too, wished to live according to himself when he did not abide in the truth.”

Thus, the City of God V the City of Man, conflict is rooted in competing notions of the “Truth.”

The satanic City of Man is filled with those who wish to live “according to themselves” while the City of God contains those who live “according to God.”

Along with the pervasive infection of sexual sin in our culture at large, the enemy of mankind has used sexual deceit to divide even the church. Virtually every conflict over dogma in the church today is due to the lies of the enemy on matters in the sexual realm. In a sad attempt to redefine truth, leftist Christians, often times from within the ultra liberal Anglican, Presbyterian, and Episcopelian greeds — if there is even such a thing — have made widespread compromise with the truth on sexual perversion, children’s molestation, aberrant sexual deviance, and on sodomy of all kinds.

Sodomy here is defined by the standard St Paul’s definition of this nasty habit as seen in the Gospel.

Yet, for years now we’ve had churches willing to embrace full on sodomy, same-sex “marriage,” pedophilia, and even that promote the killing of children in the womb. So-called “clergy” have now stooped so low as to make preparations for making abortion available in the pews. Of course, to do such evil, the Bible has to be effectively ignored — and it is. Tragically, because of the fear to embrace fully what God has revealed when it comes to sex, even those in the evangelical church are seeking to distance themselves from the Word of God.

Ironically, modern liberals have long accused conservatives — especially Christian conservatives — of being obsessed with sex. This is classic Goebels propaganda, in accusing the other side of that of which you are guilty yourself.

Because, as we can plainly see, it is the leftist socialist DemonRat liberals who are consumed with the lustful desire to have their way in the sexual realm, and to put live objects in their pooper for entertainment purposes. And it gets really creepy when they do that to the children thus creating legions more of their own kind as a sick method of their own reproductive failure.

So for the most part, it’s also the reason why they hate President Trump, why they hate the GOP, why they hate conservatives, why they hate families, and it’s also especially the reason why they hate all True Christians and the Path of the Christianity of Truth, as Jesus ordered all of us to uphold.

And that brings us to this segment of how Obama’s appointees proved to be either totally incompetent, faithless, or unashamedly anti-American.

It is all part of their agenda to hurt and punish this nation for being a Christian nation of believers and faithful people…

As for the list of driven and purposeful so called “incompetents” we could start with Obama’s choice for Vice President: Joe Biden. Uncle Joe, who was without a doubt the worst possible choice for VP since Burr. The moment Biden was announced, the jokes started flying.

Most people believed Biden was selected for “job security”. How could anybody consider getting rid of Obama for any reason with Crazy Uncle Joe being next in line for the Presidency.

Screen Shot 2018-07-31 at 9.25.31 AM

Next came the position of Secretary of State. Obama chose Hillary Clinton out of political expediency and similar to Uncle Joe, he wanted to keep the alcoholic hag close-by and actively scheming with the Billy goat, with the Clinton mafia, and with the CNN (Clinton News Network) and all the corrupt Security agencies — against their common enemies and.

Keep in mind he had seen her machine rigging the primaries against him and he now thought that he can utilize again her lust for political office and power, to his advantage.

Even with the help of an administration who used the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the FISA courts, the media, Jay-Z, Bruce Springsteen, Beyonce, and a host of other diversionary tactics — Hillary Clinton still failed to deliver on a rigged election. Compound this with Hillary Clinton using a few tricks of her own, specifically corruption, illegal money, fake ballots, dead people voting, all the Democratic party PCOs, all the Democratic party Caucus leaders, copious amounts of alcohol, Katy Perry, a crooked head of the DNC, the assassins of Seth Rich, the threat of droning against all opponents, and all the Democratic blue party dogs themselves — just to make it through the primary, and you can start seeing just how stupid Obama’s Secretary of State was.

And what of Obama’s lawless Attorney General, Eric Holder, Loretta Lunch, Valerie Jarret, and the myriad of other complicit criminals the White House harbored during his tenure there?

They oversaw what will one day undoubtedly be considered the most corrupt government in American history, bar none.

Need more evidence?

I give you Susan Rice, promoted to the role of National Security Adviser in the wake of Benghazi. She’s the person who tried to get Americans to believe that an attack in a Muslim country on 9-11 was due to a video from a nobody videographer in California.

Four people died due to her, and Hillary Clinton’s negligence. One of them was the Ambassador whose cries for help went unanswered for thirteen critical hours, while the Madame Secretary maintained her beauty sleep.

I could continue on forever with this list of Leftists lunatic actions, and aberrant sodomite behaviors, until Kingdom comes, but we would all get tired, and there is still one other Obama appointee who is the most disturbing, if you can imagine that, because he stands out from the rest of the perp walk, like a sore thumb — and an avowed communist propagandist.

This evil & stupid man, is none other that Obama’s CIA Director Comrade John Brennan, the communist apparatchik, that not only voted for the Communist Gus Hall, and that is the crowing achievement of this aberrant man-child and traitor to his country ex-CIA chief John Brennan.

But who is this John Brennan?

Well, you might have seen him most recently on the ultra leftist trash of a television station named MSNBC.

He has been hired there for the time being as a political pundit. And it seems he has been hired for one job, and one job only and that is to bash Donald Trump.

Brennan is the moron who has had the temerity to criticize American voters, campaign workers, & Trump supporters for enabling President Trump’s “treasonous actions.”

He has warned America that Trump is in fact giving aid to America’s enemies. And he has also vowed to “continue to speak out until integrity returns to the White House.”

“When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America … America will triumph over you.”
-A Tweet by Brennan.

These bold statements are hilariously ironic as they come from a man who once cast a vote for Communist Party USA candidate Gus Hall to be president of the United States.

Hall began his career with the Communist group in 1959 until his death in 2000. Not even Joe Stalin as a Party General Secretary came close to matching Gus Hall’s very long tenure. Hall was unwavering in his dedication to a global communist revolution and a truly Evil Empire.

Consider a brief history of Hall:

On vacationing in North Korea:

“The world should see what North Korea has done. In some ways it’s a miracle. If you want to take a nice vacation, take it in North Korea.”
On socialism’s inevitability in America:

“There’s no question that the United States will become a socialist country. It’s as inevitable as the sun rising tomorrow.”

On the Party remaining committed to revolution:

“We want to overthrow the capitalist system. But the means that we have chosen are ones of mass education and propaganda. We have our newspaper and we appear on talk shows and we will take part in elections.”
This same Gus Hall was supported by John Brennan as a presidential candidate for the United States back in the Brezhnev era in 1980.

Brennan literally cast a vote for the Kremlin’s man in Washington.

At the time Russia’s Leonid Brezhnev’s KGB chief was Yuri Andropov. And it was that same time that Brennan was registering a ballot for Moscow’s man in America to become America’s next president, Brezhnev and Andropov were giving the green light to one of the most deadly crimes of the 20th century: the assassination of Pope John Paul II.

Further, Andropov gave the go-ahead to the Soviet GRU to hire Muslim-Turk Mehmet Ali Agca to murder the head of the world’s largest Christian church and inheritor of the Chair of St. Peter.

And what of Brennan’s fascination with Islam?

In an interview in 2010 Brennan gave a statement on radical Islam saying:

“Our enemy is not “terrorism” because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not “terror” because terror is a state of mind. Nor do we describe our enemy as “jihadists” or “Islamists” because jihad is a holy struggle.”

Additionally Brennan has studied abroad in Cairo and has made very positive statements about Islam and the “privilege” of making pilgrimage to Mecca and paying homage to “the majesty of the Hajj.”

Yes America, this was our Obama-appointed CIA Director.

There was a time before the era of Barack Obama that a CIA director couldn’t even be considered if they were associated with groups that wish to destroy America. But all bets are off when you’re electing a man Democrats considered a God, despite his anti-American sentiment.

Brennan confessed to his past in a polygraph while being considered for director of the CIA saying: “I froze,” Brennan recalled, as he shared the moment at the annual conference of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation.

“This was back in 1980, and I thought back to a previous election where I voted, and I voted for the Communist Party candidate.”

And yet despite all of the above he was given the highest security clearance in the land. Who in their right mind would even consider such a person?

Barack Obama, that’s who.

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 1.26.00 PM

And this is how the Obama Appointee who hated America even more than what his boss did — came to be Director of the CIA.

But the list of the enemies of America is long and this fruit historically isn’t that important because there are others who have precedence, because America has undergone enormous cultural change after the second world war.

Today, America is a bitterly divided, poorly educated and morally fragile society with so-called mainstream Media, Newspapers, Politicians and Social Media tools — all pushing cynical identity politics, socialism and open borders.

Indeed, even the sitting president of the United States is threatened with impeachment because the other side doesn’t like him. The once reasonably unbiased American media has evolved into a hysterical left wing lynching mob. How could the stable and reasonably cohesive America of the 1950s have reached this point in just one lifetime? Who are the main culprits? Here’s my list of the 10 most destructive Americans of the past 70 years.

10) Mark Felt – Deputy director of the FBI, aka “Deep Throat” during the Watergate scandal. This was the first public instance of a senior FBI officially directly interfering in America’s political affairs. Forerunner of James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Andrew McCabe.

9) Bill Ayers – who represents the deep and ongoing leftist ideological damage to our education system. An unrepentant American terrorist who evaded punishment, he devoted his career to radicalizing American education and pushing leftist causes. Ghost wrote Obama’s book, “Dreams of My Father.”

8) Teddy Kennedy – whom most folks remember as the guy who left Mary Joe Kopechne to die in his car at Chappaquiddick. The real damage came after he avoided punishment for her death and became a major Democrat force in the US Senate, pushing through transformative liberal policies in health care and education. The real damage was the 1965 Hart-Cellar immigration bill he pushed hard for that changed the quota system to increase the flow of third world people without skills into the US and essentially ended large-scale immigration from Europe.

7) Walter Cronkite – who was a much beloved network anchor who began the politicalization of America’s news media with his infamous broadcast from Vietnam that described the Tet Offensive as a major victory for the Communists and significantly turned the gullible American public against the Vietnam War. In fact, the Tet offensive was a military disaster for the NVA and Viet Cong, later admitted by North Vietnamese military leaders. Decades later Cronkite admitted he got the story wrong. But it was too late. The damage was done.

6) Bill and Hillary Clinton — It’s difficult to separate Team Clinton. Bill’s presidency was largely benign as he was a relative fiscal conservative who rode the remaining benefits of the Reagan era. But his sexual exploits badly stained the Oval Office and negatively affected America’s perception of the presidency. In exchange for financial support, he facilitated the transfer of sensitive military technology to the Chinese. Hillary, a Saul Alinsky acolyte, is one of the most vicious politicians of my lifetime, covering up Bill’s sexual assaults by harassing and insulting the exploited women and peddling influence around the globe in exchange for funds for the corrupt Clinton Foundation. She signed off on the sale of 20% of the US uranium reserve to the Russians after Bill received a $500,000 speaking fee in Moscow and the foundation (which supported the Clinton’s regal lifestyle) received hundreds of millions of dollars from those who benefited from the deal. Between them, they killed any honor that might have existed in the dark halls of DC.

5) Valerie Jarrett – The Rasputin of the Obama administration. A Red Diaper baby, her father, maternal grandfather and father-in-law (Vernon Jarrett who was a close friend and ally of Obama mentor Frank Marshall Davis) were hardcore Communists under investigation by the U.S. government. She has been in Obama’s ear for his entire political career pushing a strong anti-American, Islamist, anti-Israeli, socialist/communist, cling-to-power agenda.

Screen Shot 2018-07-14 at 6.42.03 PM

4) Jimmy Carter – Carter ignited modern day radical Islam by abandoning the Shah and paving the way for Ayatollah Khomeini to take power in Tehran. Iran subsequently became the main state sponsor and promoter of international Islamic terrorism. When Islamists took over our embassy in Tehran, Carter was too weak to effectively respond thus strengthening the rule of the radical Islamic mullahs.

3) John Kerry – Some readers will likely say Kerry does not deserve to be on this list. I have him here because I regard him as one of the most despicable American who ever lived. After his three faked Purple Hearts during his cowardly service in Vietnam, he was able to leave the US Navy early. As a reserve naval officer and in clear violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, he traveled to Paris and met privately with the NVA and the Viet Cong. He returned to the United States parroting the Soviet party line about the war and testified before Congress comparing American soldiers to the hordes of Genghis Khan. It was a clear case of treason, giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. We got a second bite of the bitter Kerry apple when as Obama’s secretary of state, he fell into bed with the Iranian (“Death to America”) mullahs giving them the ultimate green light to develop nuclear weapons along with billions of dollars that further supported their terrorist activities. Only the heroic Swift Vets saved us from a Manchurian Candidate Kerry presidency.

2) Lyndon Johnson – Johnson turned the Vietnam conflict into a major war for America. It could have ended early if he had listened to the generals instead of automaker Robert McNamara. The ultimate result was: 1) 58,000 American military deaths and collaterally tens of thousands of American lives damaged; and 2) a war that badly divided America and created left wing groups that evaded the draft and eventually gained control of our education system. Even worse, his so-called War on Poverty led to the destruction of American black families with a significant escalation of welfare and policies designed to keep poor families dependent on the government (and voting Democrat) for their well-being. He deliberately created a racial holocaust that is still burning today.

1) Barack Hussein Obama – Obama set up America for a Coup D’Etat, as the final defeat and stealth conversion from a Democratic Republic and a free market Capitalist society, to a socialistic totalitarian regime, with an outlook towards achieving an Alinsky style Muslim communism under the guise of Globalism. And now as we get deeper into the Trump presidency, we learn more and more, each and every day, about how Obama politicized and compromised key government agencies, most prominently the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and the IRS, thus thoroughly shaking the public’s confidence in the US federal government’s fairness and unbiased behavior in all of its activities. He significantly stoked divisions and hate, as he set back race and other relations between Americans by fomenting black grievances and pushing radical identity politics. Obama’s open support for the Iranian mullahs with billions in pallets of hard cold CASH, and his apologetic “lead from behind” foreign policy, seriously weakened America abroad. His blatant attempt to interfere in Israel’s election trying to unseat Netanyahu is one of the most shameful things ever done by an American president, yet his attempted Coup D’Etat inside America with the SpyGate operation against a political opponent candidate Trump is a new low that removes the bar for Treason altogether and brings back the specter of Barack Obama as the modern day Benedict Arnold.

But it was the work of all the others that opened the door to infamy in America that ultimately brought us Obama.

And here are some dishonorable mentions, for the bastards that just missed the top ten list… but still belong right up there with the rest of these unmitigated criminals, like the dirty cop Bob Mueller.

Screen Shot 2018-07-31 at 9.38.41 AM

1) John Brennan –Obama’s CIA director who once voted for Communist Gus Hall for president. A key member of the Deep State who severely politicized the CIA. Called President Trump treasonous for meeting with the president of Russia.

2) Jane Fonda – movie actress who made the infamous trip to Vietnam during the war in support of the Communists. She represents hard left Hollywood that has done so much damage to our culture.

3) Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin – Both revered entertainers helped usher in the prevailing drug culture. Both personally suffered the consequences. Karma’s a bitch.

4) Robert Johnson /BET – Helped popularize ho’s, bitches and pimps while making millions on great hits such as “Jigga my Nigga”, “Big Pimpin’”, “Niggas in Paris” and “Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z.” Many scholars within the African American community maintain that BET perpetuates and justifies racism by adopting the stereotypes held about African Americans, affecting the psyche of young viewers through the bombardment of negative images of African Americans. Who can disagree?

5) Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr./The New York Times – Once the gold standard of American journalism, the paper always had a liberal tilt and occasionally made bad mistakes. As the years have gone along, the paper has slid further and further left and today is virtually the primary propaganda arm of the increasingly radical Democrat Party. Still retains influence in Washington and New York.

6) George Soros – Jewish former Nazi collaborator in his native Hungary who as a self-made billionaire has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into left wing groups and causes. The damage he has caused is difficult to measure, but it’s certainly large. He has funded much of the effort to kill the Trump presidency.

7) Frank Marshall Davis – Anti-white, black Bolshevik, card-carrying Soviet agent. Probable birth father and admitted primary mentor of young Barak Hussein Obama.

8) James Comey…

9) Rod Rosenstein…

10) Robert Mueller the third…

Thanks Obama…

Thanks to one and all.

You’ve damaged our country, but on the other hand through your Satanic work — you have helped America wake up.


Dr Churchill


Today, August 1st, president Donald J Trump called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to shut down special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, by saying on the social media & news site Twitter:  “This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!”

Makes you kinda proud to hear the President being so direct.

Because thank God we survived “Obimbo” and then had the 2016 electoral fight where we beat Hitlery to the punch — yet now we must fight all over again if we are to defeat the leftist DemonRat liberalism and his Satanic children of Muslim globalists at the Mid-Terms elections of November 2018, and we cannot get sidetracked by the evil man-child Bob Mueller BS that he keeps leaking to spoil the election in favor of the Sodomites.

We must get ready to fight all over again.

One can only hope that the simple realization of the facts and the fear of Socialism getting hold in America will abolish the DemonRat party’s left wing soonest, but not soon enough for the November midterms, not for the 2020 Presidential elections. One way or another, we need to give a Travel voucher to all the Leftist Socialists to visit some random South American shithole country like Venezuela, where just about all of their leaders are Socialists. And the American leftists can easily see for themselves if that is where they would like to live for the rest of their lives… in a country with the richest reserves of easily getable Oil in the world — and her people going hungry and utterly poor, as they fight for a piece of bread from one food riot to a famine, and on to the next food riot.

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 6.16.56 PM

That’s Socialism in action.

Because now with elections coming up — you would have guessed that the crazy DemonRats like Maxine Waters are trying their damnedest to bring all of those illegal aliens inside our country so they can vote for her in the next election, because without the illegal votes — she will be tossed out on her butt!


These Obimbo people were specifically selected in order to tear down the USA, to destroy the bastion of capitalism, and to take away the freedom of the world. The Obama handlers spent years building that team, and had it all planned, so that Hillary would follow Obama and complete the institution of the one world government, run by the Banksters, the and by the Wall Street fat cats.

Even though the Imam of the Rainbow Mosque is no longer in office, he may yet succeed in destroying America. Some of the laws and treaties he signed are still in effect. He still has millions of loyal followers, many of them working for out government working hard to destroy him and America. They are not giving up on a Socialist/Fascist America with them in charge.
Trump is our last chance of saving what’s left of our country. He needs our help as he is working virtually alone on several important issues.

So just who is Obama’s Islamic handler?
Valerie Jarrett, who you ought to know — is still living in his house in DC alongside his family, as if she is his “guru” and personal mind controller.

The heading in the first John Brennan’s “Traitor” video says: “John Brennan: Donald Trump is giving aid and comfort to the enemy.” Libs and Lefties don’t have enemies except for Donald Trump, Conservative Americans, and American Christians.

Because Trump is actually pro-Christian and for-America, this communist muslim p.o.s. Brennan, will keep spewing lies and hate against Trump. And thus we must continue praying that Trump will succeed in bringing America back to Christian principles, morals, and values.

We all know that God has historically used “imperfect” persons to bring about positive change. Indeed, the Bible is full of these imperfect people’s stories of national salvation and reclamation of whole countries.

Look at Moses…

Yet one must think it awfully ironic that Brennan of all people is talking.

Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 10.29.25 AM

HOW IRONIC that John Brennan is talking of treason and seditious acts. The one man who blatantly lied and pushed the Obama spy network on Americans. John Brennan belongs at the head of the list for treason trials…

So who will step forward to accomplish this?

Only Trump can do…

He needs to put the kibosh on this whole thing.

He needs to shut them down now.

It needs to be done if this country is to survive.

Because if this cancer gets left untreated — it will destroy the host.

In this case the host being this country that has already become unrecognizable and it will never be the same again — after more than fifty years of Leftist indoctrination and Socialistic agenda — but at least its still worth saving.

And these Real News bellow, are coming in from the President, and from Julian Assange of Wikileaks via Twitter’s news distribution network:

“We already have a smoking gun about a campaign getting dirt on their opponent, it was Hillary Clinton. How is it OK for Hillary Clinton to proactively seek dirt from the Russians but the Trump campaign met at the Russians request and that is bad?” Marc Thiessen, Washington Post

Criminal neo-McCarthyist hysteric Russophobic witch hunt by the Deep State fascists and Soros-controlled anti-Trump MSM will only end up making Trump stronger.

Still President Trump urges national unity, and sanity, because all Americans suffer when we are so sorely divided and God knows we don’t need another bloody civil war.

So it is good and great to hear from the President that we remain UNITED as AMERICANS and allow justice to take it’s course by also investigation the Hillary Clinton crimes, and her many scandals, and collusions with the Russians — especially when she sold the American strategic mineral Uranium to Mr Putin in exchange for $400 million USD, and some $150 million USD to her husband for speeches in Kremlin.

And also we need to be investigating all the crimes committed and the collusion between Putin and Obama who said that their relationship will improve after the elections, with Hillary’s “Reset” button being pressed, to allow all the American aid to flow to Russia.

And the President Trump said that “Regarding Russia, there were “no phone calls, no meetings, no collusion.” President Donald Trump pushed for an investigation of “the other side” amid the FBI probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, while claiming “we need intelligence that brings our country together.”

“A lot of bad things happened on the other side, not on this side, but on the other side. And somebody should look into it, because what they did is really fraudulent and somebody should be looking into that and by somebody, I’m talking about you know who.” This is what President Trump told Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, making a reference widely interpreted to mean the Stockholm syndrome suffering current absentee Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

AG Sessions… is gone MIA and maybe dead walking. May God save his soul…


Posted by: Dr Churchill | July 29, 2018

SpyGate (Chapter Forty Four)

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Forty Four
“Bob Mueller is a Peach”

The “bad boy” Bob Mueller after almost two years of investigating the President for Russian ghosts — must now slither away to a new hole to hide his shame, for screwing up America with a hoax and saddling the tax payer with a witch hunt that was initiated with a negative hit piece spun against “The Donald” from evil-liar Hillary, the poster child of Satan.

And whether Russian ghosts exist or not — that’s another matter, but the fact is Russian twins exist, and in their vast majority are female…

So today, the Democrat party continues its valiant quest to slay a dragon that doesn’t exist. In all fairness — when your party’s lonely midterm campaign strategy is rooted on the sole promise of the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), what else have you got to go on?

Indeed the inception of the fake Russia collusion investigation immediately following the election of President Donald Trump was of course hugely wasteful, divisive, and infuriating,  yet wholly unsurprising coming form the DemonRats.

Because how else would the DemonRat party, the Deep State, and the MSM “Enemies of the People” the mainstream media (one and the same) could they explain away the all-out rejection of their certainty, the demolition of their trusted narrative, and the ultimate befouling of their spoiled story & their partisan worldview?

How could they explain to anyone their debasement at the hands of the American voters, citizens, and patriots, that voted and installed President Trump in the White House — proving once and for all that nobody trusts the combine of foreign interests the CNN<MSNBC< NBC< ABC< FB<TWITTER<NYT<WAPO< and all the other liars who are competing to see who is the biggest Liar of them all?

Who will ever believe the New York Times and the Washington Post ever again after their harassment of the American people who now have to read between the lines for a smidgeon of truth, same as the Russian and the Chinese people needed to read between the lines if they are to find even a sniffing of “Pravda,” because while the idea of Donald Trump becoming the next President was initially met with humor and derision within the leftist bubbles of D.C., Manhattan, and Los Angeles — come election night in November of 2016, the joke was turned around and fell on them, and their egomaniacal obsession with trashing the American voters came crashing down as rivers of liberal tears were shed on the altar of Hillary’s debauchery, debasement, and deflation.

Suddenly the awful gallows humor, the self-pity, and the irate self-importance, replaced the honors and the kudos that leftist politicians and pundits enjoyed on a nightly basis while mocking, slandering and ridiculing then-candidate Trump. Suddenly their overstretched imagination, caused their heads to explode as their grief was transformed into fake moral outrage, hate against the electorate, outright embarrassment, and the inevitable red-hot anger of the Losers.

And of course going through the five stages of Grief quietly, wasn’t an option for the snowflake media, so they embarked in what they know best: HATE & RANCOR.

Still some of the DemonRats were so broken that they were carted away by the ambulances to the Psych-wards the morning after the election results were announced, some others checked-in the psychiatric asylums themselves, some others went untreated and caused episodes of Hate in their community, some others left for Canada, or for Spain, and Mexico, and some others who promised to leave — instead stayed back and attacked conservatives. Some of them became criminals and attacked and hurt people badly, and some others went so far out of the “reservation” that they got automatic guns and shot at a bunch of families of Republican representatives who were playing ball at a field in Alexandria VA.

And one of the most notable TDS sufferers got a pink pussy hat on, and shot thousands of rounds of ammunition at a bunch of concert goers at a Las Vegas outdoor arena playing Country Music, killing 58 people and injuring hundreds more.

Yet, some DemonRats, LibTards, and TDS sufferers even self selected to cause evil deeds, to the majority of Americans by staying on, and looking around for an escape clause…

So now they needed a target and a “solution” to hit that target.

“Firing Solution” is the military code-word for cannon firing in a certain coordinate where the enemy lurks. It comes from a forward position spotter, who communicates on a walkie talkie the specific target coordinates, and the cannons zoom  their fire onto that spot.

So what was the libtards and the demonrats “firing solution” against the New President?

Their “firing solution” became the Hillary manufactured hoax of the supposed Russia Collusion with Trump campaign.

And of course their true target was President Trump.

The CNN alone through its hateful daily talk has caused dozens of TDS suffering people to wind up in jail or in prison for attacking Conservative Christians, sometimes even within the confines of the church…

CNN and the rest of the MSM have been actively creating & implanting TDS in gullible people, who in turn gone mad as hell, and have gotten innocent people beaten, and some of them quite severely. And now CNN is calling their handiwork “Trump Anxiety Disorder” and blaming him for it… CNN is truly the Clinton New Network and is made up of the utter scum of this earth with zero journalistic integrity…

Except even these DemonRats could not be so obviously engaging in “firing solutions” and cannon fusillades against the President — they shifted their evil-doings, they masked their attacks on the President, and they instead started it all up as an investigation into the Russia meddling of our elections, and the supposed hacking of the email servers of the DNC that now we know it was Seth Rich’s doing his stint as a valiant whistleblower.

And of course he was killed by the Clinton mafia for it; but his killers thought at the highest level (Hillary’s Outhouse) — why don’t exploit a crisis and instead turn it into an opportunity?

So same as with the killing of scores of opponents — this Clinton murder became a useful tool for the Russian meddling on our elections by pretending that it was not the murder victim Seth Rich that died for his hacking and giving-out the emails of the DNC where he worked in the first place; but it was the blasted Russian who hacked the DNC servers from afar… and for some reason turned around and gave the emails to Wikileaks…

Far fetched, and fancy footing — but seems half the people have swallowed it whole: Hook, line, and sinker.

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 1.55.59 PM

Yet we all know who was their target from day one of this witch hunt that got started from an opposition research paper that was the ultimate fake news story, because their target is Donald J Trump, the newly installed President, and they couldn’t hide their overflowing Hate and Rancor against him.

Obviously the corrupt and liberal MSM, the Social Media, the Deep State, and the Gray Lady (NYT), and WAPO, along with the Clinton News Network (CNN) and MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc, have all come to an agreement that from here-on-forward they will blame all of their failures on Russia, their Loss of Face in calling the Elections all wrong they will blame it on the Russian’s meddling and rather successful electioneering, and they will blame the Russian President for his “ownership” of “The Donald” so that they can then somehow magically impeach, have him drawn & quartered, and decapitate the President — not necessarily in that order.

But at least they thought that they will have a way to remove him from office, so that afterwards, they can somehow magically install Satan’s only child, Hillary Rodham Clinton, in the Presidency instead.

Seriously folks — this is their plan.

And they expect that it will not backfire on them.

Methinks it will same as the Ugly Coyote Bob Mueller will soon find out when the RoadRunner Donald steamrolls him with the Uranium Sale to the Russians charge against him and against Hillary.

As for the rest of us — we see this and wail in laughter…

Some of us, even have tears of Joy, at the delusional thinking of the TDS suffering DemonRats.

Some others are making money treating Trump Derangement Syndrome TDS sufferers with placebos at hugely inflated prices.

The runaway opioid addiction is partly to blame on the TDS and the obvious need to numb the pain.

Several states with Libtard Governors and Snowflake legislators have legalized Marijuana in order to treat this TDS syndrome that bedevils the population of Blue regions across the country.

Of course smoking Marijuana even at it’s most potent variety, or ingesting the Cannabis oil extract, or even shooting up the Marijuana-Heroin mix — cannot treat the strong TDS syndrome sufferers fully, but at least people are getting stoned out of their minds and thus enjoy moments of amnesia that occasionally last for eight hours or more…

TDS is real.

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 10.27.19 AM


Wait, you want to blame Russia for the DNC and Hillary rigging the Primaries?

Want to blame Russia for Hillary winning the primaries against Bernie Sanders?

You fvckin kidding me?

To quote Barack Obama, “The Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”

But even if that awfully humorous theory was correct — is Russia the only country “meddling” in our political system?


As Tucker Carlson recently pointed out, Mexico has been far more successful at “meddling” in U.S elections than Russia has, by encouraging its citizens to illegally enter the United States.

As Mexico’s President-elect Lopez-Obrador stated during his campaign, he believes migrating to the United States is “a human right we will defend.”

But the so-called “meddling” done by Mexico, China (huge meddler) or even Russia — pales in comparison to the explicit infiltration of our political system by the terrorist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood is the oldest and most sophisticated Islamic terrorist organization in the world, with devotees including Osama bin Laden, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and current al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.

The Brotherhood devised a plan to destroy the United States not from abroad, but from within, and have successfully done so through front groups that currently yield enormous power on Capitol Hill, most notably the Council for American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America.

Both CAIR and ISNA enjoy legitimacy from politicians in both parties, as well as the mainstream media, despite both having proven financial ties to the Palestinian terrorist network Hamas.

In fact, in 2008, both were named as unindicted co-conspirators in the largest terrorist financing trial in world history known as the Holy Land Foundation trial. The Islamist front groups continue to raise millions of dollars unfettered and maintain access to politicians at the highest levels of government.

So where is the outrage from the media? Where is the investigation from our so-called leaders?

Following President Trump’s recent meeting in Helsinki with President Vladimir Putin, retiring Speaker Paul Ryan was quick to tweet about how crucially important it was for President Trump to recognize that the House Intelligence Committee has also found that Russia “interfered” in our election.

This begs a few important questions:

  1. Was this the first time they “interfered” in our election or did they also “interfere” during 2012 to combat a particularly anti-Russia then-candidate Romney in support of a potentially very “flexible” post-election then-President Obama.
  2. Would acquiring U.S uranium production and interests in exchange for a substantial donation to a certain Secretary of State’s foundation constitute “interfering?”
  3. Given that the greatest threat to Western civilization has been Islamic terrorism since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than 25 years ago, could we maybe also have a House Intelligence investigation into Islamist collusion within our government through established terrorist front groups such as CAIR or ISNA?
  4. And what to make of the infiltration of famous Islamic Militants at the highest levels of government as Valerie Jared being the “Boss” of President Obama, and Huma Abedin being the “Boss” of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, proves?
  5. So why the left and establishment right’s obsessive focus on Russia and blatant blind eye to the most critical threats?

In case you hadn’t noticed, the radical left doesn’t exactly consider radical Islamic terrorism the highest of priorities, which is both terrifying and shocking in a post-9/11 world that 100% of all terrorist actions inside the United States have been perpetuated by Islamic Jihadists.

Because not only does Islamic jihad terrorism threatens the Libtards’ multi-cultural worldview, but focusing on ghosts of the past such as the evil Soviet empire gives globalist alliances such as NATO, which were specifically established to defend the West against communism, a chance to flex their muscles of self-importance again.

President Trump puts America first and threatens the entrenched ways of old, both domestically, and internationally, and as such, he has made enemies with both the radical left and globalist right.

The good news is, as was true during his campaign, if President Trump stays focused on securing the border, draining the swamp and putting America first, the citizens of this nation will back him up, no matter the onslaught of attacks he faces from either direction.

And the Bad News is that dirty cop Bob Mueller is leading the investigation into the “Russia Collusion” matter trying to literally nail the President of the US Donald J Trump, onto the Cross for daring to support the people of America.

Screen Shot 2018-07-29 at 10.00.28 AM

Because as anyone will tell you Bob Mueller is no peach… but rather this man is a mafioso of the first kind as Congressman Louie Gohmert shares with us here today:

–by Congressman Louie Gohmert

“Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone.
I do not make these statements lightly.
Each time I prepared to question Mueller during Congressional hearings, the more concerned I became about his work ethic. Then as I went back to begin compiling all that information in order to recount personal interactions with Mueller, the more clearly the big picture began to come into focus. At one point I had to make the decision to stop adding to this or it would turn into a far too lengthy project.
My goal was to share some first-hand information as other Republican Members of Congress had requested, adding, “You seem to know so much about him.” This article is prepared from my viewpoint to help better inform the reader about the Special Prosecutor leading the effort to railroad President Donald J. Trump through whatever manufactured charge he can allege. Judging by Mueller’s history, it doesn’t matter who he has to threaten, harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get someone to be willing to allege something—anything—about our current President, it certainly appears Mueller will do what it takes to bring down his target, ethically, or unethically, based on my findings.
What does former Attorney General Eric Holder say? Sounds like much the same thing I just said. Holder: “I’ve known Bob Mueller for 20, 30 years; my guess is he’s just trying to make the case as good as he possibly can.” Holder does know him. He has seen Mueller at work when Holder was obstructing justice and acting in contempt of Congress. He knows Mueller’s FBI framed innocent people and had no remorse in doing so. Let’s look at what we know.
What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Mueller’s disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully-elected President.
Any Republican who says anything resembling, “Bob Mueller will do a good job as Special Counsel,” “Bob Mueller has a great reputation for being fair,” or anything similar; (A) wants President Trump indicted for something and removed from office regardless of

his innocence; (B) is intentionally ignorant of the myriad of outrageous problems permeating Mueller’s professional history; or (C) is cultivating future Democrat votes when he or she comes before the Senate someday for a confirmation hearing.
There is simply too much clear and convincing information available to the contrary. Where other writers have set out information succinctly, I have quoted them, with proper attribution. My goal is to help you see what I have found.
Robert Mueller
In his early years as FBI Director, most Republican members of Congress gave Mueller a pass in oversight hearings, allowing him to avoid tough questions. After all, we were continually told, “Bush appointed him.” I gave him easy questions the first time I questioned him in 2005 out of deference to his Vietnam service. Yet, the longer I was in Congress, the more conspicuous the problems became. As I have said before of another Vietnam veteran, just because someone deserves our respect for service or our sympathy for things that happened to them in the military, that does not give them the

right to harm our country later. As glaring problems came to light, I toughened up my questions in the oversight hearings. But first, let’s cover a little of Mueller’s history.

MUELLER’S MINIONS HELP MOBSTER WHITEY BULGER ELIMINATE MOB COMPETITORS The Boston Globe noted Robert Mueller’s connection with the Whitey Bulger case in an
article entitled, “One Lingering Question for FBI Director Robert Mueller.” The Globe said this:
“[Mike] Albano [former Parole Board Member who was threatened by two F.B.I. agents for considering parole for the men imprisoned for a crime they did not commit] was appalled that, later that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as an assistant US attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies. Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in
shallow graves along the Neponset…”
[ robert-mueller/613uW0MR7czurRn7M4BG2J/story.html]
Mueller was the head of the Criminal Division as Assistant U.S. Attorney, then as Acting U.S. Attorney. I could not find any explanation online by Mueller as to why he insisted on keeping the defendants in prison that FBI agents—in the pocket of Whitey Bulger— had framed for a murder they did not commit. Make no mistake: these were not honorable people he had incarcerated. But it was part of a pattern that eventually became quite clear that Mueller was more concerned with convicting and putting people in jail he disliked, even if they were innocent of the charges, than he was with ferreting out the truth.
I found no explanation as to why he did not bear any responsibility for the $100 million paid to the defendants who were framed by FBI agents under his control. The Boston Globe said, “Thanks to the FBI’s corruption, taxpayers got stuck with the $100 million bill
for compensating the framed men, two of whom, Greco and Tameleo, died in prison.”
[ mueller/613uW0MR7czurRn7M4BG2J/amp.html]
The New York Times explained the relationship this way: “In the 1980’s, while [FBI Agent] Mr. Connolly was working with Whitey Bulger, Mr. Mueller was assistant United States

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 2.00.53 PM

attorney in Boston in charge of the criminal division and for a period was the acting
United States attorney here, presiding over Mr. Connolly and Mr. Bulger as a ’top-
echelon informant.’ Officials of the Massachusetts state police and the Boston Police
Department had long wondered why their investigations of Mr. Bulger were always
compromised before they could gather evidence against him, and they suspected that
the FBI was protecting him.”
If Mr. Mueller had no knowledge that the FBI agents he used were engaged in criminal activity, then he certainly was so incredibly blind that he should never be allowed back into any type of criminal case supervision. He certainly helped continue to contribute to the damages of the framed individuals by working so hard to prevent them from being paroled out of prison even as their charges were on their way to being completely thrown out.
Notice also evidence of a pattern throughout this article: the leaking of information to disparage Mueller’s targets. In the Whitey Bulger case, the leaks were to organized crime, the Mob.
One of the basic tenets of our Democratic Republic is that we never imprison people for being “bad” people. Anyone imprisoned has to have committed a specific crime for which they are found guilty. Not in Mueller’s world. He has the reverse list of Santa Claus; and, if you are on his list, you get punished even if you are framed. He never apologizes when the truth is learned, no matter how wrong or potentially criminal or malicious the prosecution was. In his book, you deserve what you get even if you did not commit the crime for which he helped put you away.
This is one example, but as Al Pacino once famously said, “I’m just getting warmed up!”
During my first term in Congress, 2005-2006, Congressman Curt Weldon delivered
some powerful and relentless allegations about the FBI having prior knowledge that 9- 11 was coming. He alleged loudly and vociferously that there was documentary evidence to show that 9-11 could have been prevented and thousands of lives saved if the FBI had done their job. My recollection is that he may have even accused them of intentionally turning their heads. He held up documents at times while making these claims in speeches on the floor of the House of Representatives.

I was surprised that FBI Director Mueller seemed to take those allegations without the major response that appeared to be appropriate, at least to me. It seemed he should either admit the FBI made significant mistakes or refute the allegations. Little did I know Mueller’s FBI was preparing a response, but it certainly was not the kind of response that I would have expected if an honorable man had been running that once hallowed institution.
Congressman Curt Weldon
You can read two of Congressman Weldon’s speeches on the House floor that are linked below. After reading the excerpts I have provided, you may get a window into the mind of the FBI Director or someone under Mueller’s control at the FBI. The FBI literally destroyed Congressman Weldon’s public service life which foreclosed his ability to use a national platform to expose what he believed were major problems in the FBI fostered under the Clinton administration.
Here is but one such excerpt of a speech wherein he spoke of the failure of the FBI leadership, then under the direction of the Clinton administration as it ultimately came within Mueller’s control right before 9-11. They failed to even accept from the military any information on the very terrorists who would later go on to commit the atrocities of

9-11, much less act upon it. They gleaned this information through development of a surveillance technology in a project called Able Danger.
Rep. Curt Weldon
House Floor Speech, October 19, 2005 [EXCERPT]
Mr. Speaker, back in 1999 when I was Chair of the Defense Research Subcommittee, the Army was doing cutting-edge work on a new type of technology to allow us to understand and predict emerging transnational terrorist threats. That technology was being done at several locations but was being led by our Special Forces Command. The work that they were doing was unprecedented. And because of what I saw there, I supported the development of a national capability of a collaborative center that the CIA would just not accept.
In fact, in November 4 of 1999, two years before 9-11, in a meeting in my office with the Deputy Secretary of Defense, Deputy Director of the CIA, Deputy Director of the FBI, we presented a nine-page proposal to create a national collaborative center. When we finished the brief, the CIA said we did not need that capability, and so before 9-11 we did not have it.
When President Bush came in after a year of research, he announced the formation of the Terrorism Threat Integration Center, exactly what I had proposed in 1999. Today it is known as the NCTC, the National Counterterrorism Center. But, Mr. Speaker, what troubles me is not the fact that we did not take those steps.
What troubles me is that I now have learned in the last four months that one of the tasks that was being done in 1999 and 2000 was a top- secret program organized at the request of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, carried out by the general in charge of our Special Forces Command, a very elite unit focusing on information regarding al Qaeda.
It was a military language effort to allow us to identify the key cells of al Qaeda around the world and to give the military the capability to plan actions against those cells, so they could not attack us as they did

in 1993 at the Trade Center, at the Khobar Towers, the U.S.S. Cole attack, and the African embassy bombings.
What I did not know, Mr. Speaker, up until June of this year, was that that secret program called Able Danger actually identified the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda in January and February of 2000, over one year before 9-11 ever happened. In addition, I learned that not only did we identify the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda, but we identified Mohamed Atta as one of the members of that Brooklyn cell along with three other terrorists who were the leadership of the 9-11 attack.
I have also learned, Mr. Speaker, that in September of 2000, again, over one year before 9-11, that Able Danger team attempted on three separate occasions to provide information to the FBI about the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda, and on three separate occasions they were denied by lawyers in the previous administration to transfer that information.
Mr. Speaker, this past Sunday on “Meet the Press,” Louis Freeh, FBI Director at the time, was interviewed by Tim Russert. The first question to Louis Freeh was in regard to the FBI’s ability to ferret out the terrorists. Louis Freeh’s response, which can be obtained by anyone in this country as a part of the official record, was, ‘Well, Tim, we are now finding out that a top-secret program of the military called Able Danger actually identified the Brooklyn cell of al Qaeda and Mohammed Atta over a year before 9-11.’
And what Louis Freeh said, Mr. Speaker, is that that kind of actionable data could have allowed us to prevent the hijackings that occurred on September 11.
So now we know, Mr. Speaker, that military intelligence officers working in a program authorized by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the general in charge of Special Forces Command, identified Mohammed Atta and three terrorists a year before 9-11, tried to transfer that information to the FBI were denied; and the FBI Director has now said publicly if he would have had that information, the FBI could have used it to perhaps prevent the hijackings that struck the

World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the plane that landed in
Pennsylvania and perhaps saved 3,000 lives and changed the course
of world history. (Emphasis added)
Curt Weldon gave speech after speech, recounting what he saw and what he knew, recounting the FBI and the Clinton administration failures in information sharing that led to 9-11. []
Congressman Weldon tried to hold those accountable in the FBI and CIA that he felt mishandled actionable intelligence which
he said could have thwarted the 9-11 terrorists if only top officials at the FBI and others had allowed our rank-and-file law enforcement and military to engage in such a battle. He recounted many examples of how they failed to do so.
“People say those kinds of things just don’t happen in America…”
Understand, I am not a 9-11 denier, nor a big conspiracy advocate. I am simply relaying things for which Congressman Weldon lambasted people at the top of the FBI and other places. []
In 2006, the Robert Mueller-led FBI took horrendously unjust actions to derail Curt Weldon’s re-election bid just weeks before the vote—actions that were later described as a “hit job” in this WND article:
“Each of Weldon’s 10 previous re-elections had been by sizable margins. Polls showed he was up by 5-7 points [in the fall of 2006]. Three weeks prior to the election, however, a national story ran about Weldon based upon anonymous sources that an investigation was underway against him and his daughter, alleging illegal activities involving his congressional work.
Weldon had received no prior notification of any such investigation and was dumbfounded that such a story would run especially since he regularly briefed the FBI and intelligence agencies on his work.

A week after the news story broke, alleging a need to act quickly because of the leak, FBI agents from Washington raided the home of Weldon’s daughter at 7 a.m. on a Monday morning… Local TV and print media had all been alerted to the raid in advance and were already in position to cover the story. Within hours, Democratic protesters were waving “Caught Red-Handed” signs outside Weldon’s district office in Upper Darby.
In the ensuing two weeks, local and national media ran multiple stories implying that Weldon too must have been under investigation. Given the coverage, Weldon lost the election…
To this day, incredibly, no one in authority has talked to Weldon or his daughter about the raid or the investigation. There was no follow up, no questions, no grand jury interrogation, nothing.
One year after the raid the local FBI office called Weldon’s
daughter to have her come get the property that had been
removed from her home. That was it…The raid ruined the career
of Weldon and his daughter.” (Emphasis added)
Though the WND article blamed the Clintons and Sandy Berger for orchestrating the FBI “hit job,” we can’t lose sight of the fact that the head of the FBI at the time was Robert Mueller. Please understand what former FBI officials have told me: the FBI would NEVER go after a member of Congress, House or Senate, without the full disclosure to and blessing of the FBI Director. Even if the idea on how to silence Curt Weldon did not come from Director Mueller himself, it surely had his blessing and encouragement, though and, at best, his silence and inaction.
The early morning raid by Mueller’s FBI with all the media outside, obviously alerted by the FBI, had achieved its goal of colluding to abuse the federal justice system to silence Curt Weldon by ending his political career. Mueller’s FBI worked it like a charm. If the Clintons and Berger manipulated Weldon’s reelection to assure his defeat, they did it with the artful aid of Mueller, all while George W. Bush was President. Is any of this sounding familiar?

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 2.01.41 PM

People say those kinds of things just don’t happen in America. They certainly seemed to when Mueller was in charge of the FBI and they certainly seem to while he is Special Counsel, as well.
It appears clear that President Obama and his myrmidons knew of Mueller’s reputation, that he could be used to take out their political opponents should such extra-legal actions become politically necessary.
“It appears clear that President Obama and his myrmidons knew of Mueller’s reputation…”
To the great dismay of the many good, decent and straight arrow FBI agents, Obama begged Mueller to stay on for two more years than the 10 years the law allowed. Obama then asked Congress to approve Mueller’s waiver allowing him to stay on two extra years.
Perhaps the leaders in Congress did not realize what they were doing in approving it. I did. It was a major mistake, and I said so at the time. This is also why I objected strenuously the moment I heard Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed his old friend Bob Mueller to be Special Counsel to go after President Trump.

Rod Rosenstein
I was one of the few who were NOT surprised when Mueller started selecting his assistants in the Special Counsel’s office who had reputations for being bullies, for indicting people who were not guilty of the charges, for forcing people toward bankruptcy by running up their attorney’s fees (while the bullies in the Special Counsel’s office enjoy an apparently endless government budget), or by threatening innocent family members with prosecution so the Special Counsel’s victim would agree to pleading guilty to anything to prevent the Kafka-esque prosecutors from doing more harm to their families.
The pattern is there. Are you seeing it?
There is a doctrine in our experiment in self-government mandating that all parts of the government must have oversight to prevent power from corrupting and absolute power
from corrupting absolutely. The Congress and Senate are accountable to the voters as is the President. All the massive bloated bureaucracy is supposed to be accountable to the Congress.

A good example would be complaints against the Department of Justice or, specifically, the FBI. If constituents or whistleblowers within those entities have complaints, a Congressman’s office is a good place to contact. Our conversations or information from constituents or whistleblowers are normally privileged from review by anyone within the Executive Branch. It must be so. If the FBI could raid our offices anytime an FBI agent were to complain to us, no FBI agent could ever afford to come forward, no matter how egregious the conduct they are wanting to disclose. Whistle blowing FBI Agents have to know they are protected. They always have known that in the past.
As I learned from talking with attorneys who had helped the House previously with this issue, if the FBI or another law enforcement entity needed to search something on the House side of the Capitol or House office buildings, they contacted the House Counsel, whether with a warrant or request. The House Counsel with approval of the Speaker, would go through the Congress Members documents, computers, flash drives, or anything that might have any bearing on what was being sought as part of the investigation. They would honestly determine what was relevant and what was not, and what was both irrelevant and privileged from Executive Branch review.
Normally, if there were a dispute or question, it could be presented to a federal judge for a private in-chamber review to determine if it were privileged or relevant. If the DOJ or FBI were to get a warrant and gather all computers or documents in a Congressman’s office without the recovered items being screened to insure they are not privileged from DOJ seizure, the DOJ would be risking that an entire case might be thrown out because of things improperly recovered and “fruit of the poisonous tree,” preventing the use of even things that were not privileged.
However, FBI Director Mueller seemed determined to throw over 200 years of Constitutional restraints to the wind so he could let Congress know he was the unstoppable government bully who could potentially waltz into our offices whenever he wished. In the case of Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat of Louisiana, Mueller was willing to risk a reversal of a slam dunk criminal case just to send a message to the rest of Congress: you don’t mess with the Zohan, if the Zohan is Bob Mueller.
That Congressman Jefferson was guilty of something did not surprise most observers when, amidst swirling allegations, $90,000 in cold hard cash was found in his freezer. As we understood it, the FBI had a witness who was wired and basically got Jefferson on tape taking money. They had mountains of indisputable evidence to prove their case. They had gotten an entirely appropriate warrant to search his home and had even more mountains of evidence to nail the lid on his coffin, figuratively speaking.

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 2.00.19 PM

The FBI certainly did not need to conduct an unsupervised search of a Congressman’s
office to put their unbeatable case at risk. Apparently, the risk was worth it to Mueller
so he could show the Members of Congress who could harass or destroy them whenever
he wished. Apparently, the FBI knew just the right federal judge who would disregard
the Constitution and allow Mueller’s minions to do their dirty work.
I read the Application for Warrant and the accompanying Affidavit for Warrant to raid Jefferson’s office, as I did so many times as a felony judge. I could not believe they would risk such a high-profile case just to try to intimidate Members of Congress. In the opinion of this former prosecutor, felony judge and Appellate Court Chief Justice, they could have gotten a conviction based on what they had already spelled out in the very lengthy affidavit.
The official attorneys representing the House, knowing my background, allowed me to sit in on the extremely heated discussions between attorneys for the House, DOJ attorneys, and, to my recollection, an attorney from the Bush White House, after Jefferson’s office was raided. The FBI had gathered up virtually every kind of record, computerized or otherwise, and carted them off. I was not aware of the times that the DOJ and House attorneys, with the Speaker’s permission, had cooperated over the years. No Congressman is above the law nor is any above having search warrants issued against them which is why Jefferson’s home was searched without protest. However, when the material is in a Congressional office, there is a critical and centuries’ old balance of power that must be preserved.
The Mueller FBI spokespeople along with the DOJ choir assured everyone that everything was fine. They were going to have some of the DOJ’s attorneys review all the material and give back anything that was privileged and unlawful for the DOJ to see. Then they would make sure none of the DOJ attorneys who participated in the review of materials (that were privileged from the DOJ’s viewing) would be allowed to be prosecutors in Jefferson’s case. If you find that kind of thinking terribly flawed and constitutionally appalling, you would be in agreement with the former Speakers of the House, the Vice President at the time, and ultimately, the final decisions of our federal appellate court system. They found the search to be illegal and inappropriate. Fortunately for the DOJ, they did not throw the entire case out.
In retrospect, we did not know at the time what a farce a DOJ “firewall” would have been. Now we do!

In federal law enforcement, it takes a new federal agent or supervisor about five years
or so after arriving at a newly assigned office to gain the trust and respect of local law officers. That trust and respect is absolutely critical to doing the best job possible. Yet new FBI Director Robert Mueller came up with a new personnel policy that would rid the FBI of thousands of years of its most invaluable experience.
In a nutshell, after an FBI employee was in any type of supervisory position for five years, he or she had to either come to Washington to sit at a desk or get out of the FBI. In the myriad of FBI offices around the country, most agents love what they do in actively enforcing the law. They have families involved in the community; their kids enjoy their schools; and they do not want to move to the high cost of living in Washington, DC, and especially not to an inside desk job.
What occurred around the country was that agents in charge of their local offices got out of the FBI and did something more lucrative. Though they really wanted to stay in, they were not allowed to do so if they were not moving to DC. Agents told me that it was not unusual for the Special Agent in Charge of a field office to have well over 20 years of experience before the policy change. Under Mueller’s policy that changed to new Special Agents in Charge having five to ten years of experience when they took over.
If the FBI Director wanted nothing but “yes” men and women around the country working for him, this was a great policy. Newer agents are more likely to unquestioningly salute the FBI Mecca in Washington, and the Director, and never boldly offer a suggestion to fix a bad idea and Mueller had plenty of them. Whether it was wasting millions of dollars on a software boondoggle or questionable personnel preferences, agents tell me Mueller did not want to hear from more experienced people voicing their concerns about his ideas or policies.
An NPR report December 13, 2007, entitled, “FBI’S ‘Five-And-Out’ Transfer Policy Draws Criticism” dealt with the Mueller controversial policy:
“From the beginning of this year (2007) until the end of September (2007), 576 agents found themselves in the five-and-out pool. Less than half of them — just 286 — opted to go to headquarters; 150 decided to take a pay cut and a lesser job to stay put; 135 retired; and five resigned outright.”

In the period of nine months accounted for in this report, the FBI ran off a massive amount of absolutely priceless law enforcement experience vested in 140 invaluable agents. For the vast part, those are the agents who have seen the mistakes, learned lessons, could advise newer agents on unseen pitfalls of investigations and pursuit of justice. So many of these had at least 20-30 years of experience or more. The lessons learned by such seasoned agents were lost as the agents carried it with them when they left.
In the 2007 NPR report, the FBI Agents Association indicated that the Five-Year-Up-or- Out program hobbles field offices and takes relationships forged there for granted. In other words, it was a terrible idea.
The incalculable experience loss damages the FBI by eliminating those in the field in a position to write to or meet with the FBI Director to advise him against some of the mounting judgment errors on his part which were listed in the NPR article. But this was not the only damage done.

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 5.05.27 AM
If an FBI Director has inappropriate personal vengeance in mind or holds an inappropriate prejudice such as those that infamously motivated Director J. Edgar Hoover, then the older, wiser, experienced agents were not around with the confidence to question or guide the Director away from potential misjudgment. I also cannot help but wonder if Mueller had not run off the more experienced agents, would they have been able to advise against and stop the kind of abuses and corruption being unearthed right now that occurred during the Obama administration.
Rather than admit that his Five Year Up or Out Policy was a mistake, Mueller eventually changed the policy to a Seven Year Up or Out Program.
I once pointed out to him at a hearing that if he had applied the Five Year Up-or-Out Policy to literally everyone in a supervisory position, he himself would have had to leave the FBI by September of 2006. He did not seem to be amused.
One other problem remained that will be discussed in more detail later in this article. Before Mueller became Director, FBI agents were trained to identify certain Muslims who had radicalized and become dangerous. Mueller purged and even eliminated training that would have helped identify radical Islamic killers. By running off the more experienced agents who had better training on radical Islam before Mueller, “blinded us of the ability to identify our enemy,” as I was told by some of them, Mueller put victims in harm’s way in cities like Boston, San Diego and elsewhere.

National Security Letters (NSL) are a tool that allows the DOJ to bypass the formality of
subpoenas, applications for warrants with affidavits in support, and instead simply send a letter to an individual, business or any entity they so choose to demand that records or documents of any kind must be produced and provided to the sender. The letter also informs the recipient that if the recipient reveals to anyone that the letter was received or what it requires to be produced, then the recipient has committed a federal felony and will be prosecuted. It is a rather dramatic event to receive such a letter and realize that this simple letter could have such profound power and consequences.
The Committee in the House of Representatives that has oversight jurisdiction over the DOJ is the Judiciary Committee of which I am a member. We have grilled DOJ personnel in the past over the potential for NSL abuse, but both the House and Senate Committees were reassured that there were no known abuses of this extra-constitutional power.
Unfortunately, the day came when we learned that there had been an extraordinary number of abuses. Apparently, some of Mueller’s FBI agents had just been sending out demands for records or documents without any probable cause as the Fourth Amendment requires. Some agents were on outright fishing expeditions just to find out what different people were doing. We were told that there may have even been thousands of NSL’s sent out to get documents without following either the Constitutional requirements or the DOJ’s own policy requirements.
When the Inspector General’s report revealed such absolutely outrageous conduct by FBI agents, some of us in Congress were absolutely livid.
An NBC News report on March 9, 2007, had this headline and sub-headline: “Justice
Department: FBI acted illegally on data; Audit finds agency misused Patriot Act to obtain
information on citizens.” [ department-fbi-acted-illegally-data/#.WsY9YYjwaUk]
The report went on to say, “FBI Director Robert Mueller said he was to blame for not putting more safeguards into place. ‘I am to be held accountable,’ Mueller said. He told reporters he would correct the problems and did not plan to resign. ‘The inspector general went and did the audit that I should have put in place many years ago,’ Mueller said.”
Some of us Republicans wanted to completely eliminate such an extraordinary power that was so widely abused. Nonetheless, I could not help but wonder that if Mueller had

not run off thousands of years of experience though his “Five Year Up-or-Out Policy,” perhaps young, inexperienced agents would not have been so tempted to vastly abuse the power of the NSL. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales lost his job over the widespread, pervasive abuses under Mueller’s supervision. In retrospect, Mueller probably should have been gone first. It was his people, his lack of oversight, his atmosphere that encouraged it, and his FBI that did virtually nothing to hold people accountable.
Senator Ted Stevens
With Mueller as his mentor and confidant, is it any surprise that we’re now finding James Comey’s FBI found additional ways to monitor Americans and plot with Democrat loyalists in an attempt to oust a duly-elected President?

Ted Stevens had served in the U.S. Senate since 1968 and was indicted in 2008 by the
U.S. Justice Department. One would think before the U.S. government would seek to destroy a sitting U.S. Senator, there would be no question whatsoever of his guilt. One would be completely wrong in thinking so when the FBI Director is Robert Mueller.
Roll Call provides us with General Colin Powell’s take on Ted Stevens: []
“According to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who had worked closely with the senator since his days as President Ronald Reagan’s national security adviser, the senator was ‘a trusted individual … someone whose word you could rely on. I never heard in all of those years a single dissenting voice with respect to his integrity, with respect to his forthrightness, and with respect to the fact that when you shook hands with Ted Stevens, or made a deal with Ted Stevens, it was going to be a deal that benefited the nation in the long run, one that he would stick with.’”
Such a glowing reputation certainly did not inhibit Mueller’s FBI from putting Stevens in its cross-hairs, pushing to get an indictment that came 100 days before his election, and engaging in third world dictator-type tactics to help an innocent man lose his election, after which he lost his life.
As reported by NPR, after the conviction and all truth came rolling out of the framing and conviction of Senator Stevens, the new Attorney General Eric Holder, had no choice. He “abandoned the Stevens case in April 2009 after uncovering new and ‘disturbing’ details about the prosecution…”
Unfortunately for Ted Stevens, his conviction came only eight days before his election, which tipped the scales on a close election.
Does this sound familiar yet?
The allegation was that Senator Stevens had not paid full price for improvements to his Alaska cabin. As Roll Call reported, he had actually overpaid for the improvements by over twenty percent. Roll Call went on to state:

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 1.57.44 PM

“But relying on false records and fueled by testimony from a richly rewarded
‘cooperating’ witness… government prosecutors convinced jurors to find him guilty just
eight days before the general election which he lost by less than 2 percent of the vote.”
After a report substantiated massive improprieties by the FBI and DOJ in the investigation and prosecution of Senator Stevens, the result was ultimately a complete dismissal of the conviction.
At the time there was no direct evidence that Director Mueller was aware of the tactics of concealing exculpatory evidence that would have exonerated Stevens, and the creation of evidence that convicted him in 2008. Nearly four years later, in 2012, the Alaska Dispatch News concluded:
“Bottom line: Kepner (the lead FBI investigator accused of wrongdoing
by Agent Joy) is still working for the FBI and is still investigating cases,
including criminal probes. Joy, the whistleblower (who was the FBI
agent who disclosed the FBI’s vast wrongdoing, especially of Kepner),
has left the agency.” [ botched-ted-stevens-case-still-employed/2012/06/07/]
Director Mueller either did control or could have controlled what happened to the lead FBI agent that destroyed a well-respected U.S. Senator. That U.S. Senator was not only completely innocent of the manufactured case against him, he was an honest and honorable man. Under Director Mueller’s overriding supervision, the wrongdoer who helped manufacture the case stayed on and the whistleblower was punished. Obviously, the FBI Director wanted his FBI agents to understand that honesty would be punished if it revealed wrongdoing within Mueller’s organization.
Further, not only was evidentiary proof of Senator Stevens’ innocence concealed from the Senator’s defense attorneys by the FBI, there was also a witness that provided compelling testimony that Stevens’ had done everything appropriately. That witness, however, was who agents sent back to Alaska by FBI Agents, unbeknownst to the Senator’s defense attorneys.
This key exonerating testimony was placed out of reach for Senator Stevens’ defense. Someone should have gone to jail for this illegality within the nation’s top law enforcement agency. Instead, Senator Stevens lost his seat, and surprise, surprise, Mueller’s FBI helped another elected Republican bite the dust. Unfortunately, I am not speaking figuratively.

In August of 2010, former Senator Stevens boarded his doomed plane. But for the heinous, twisted and corrupt investigation by the FBI, and inappropriate prosecution by the DOJ, he would have still been a sitting U.S. Senator. Don’t forget, one vote in the Senate was critical to ObamaCare becoming law also. If Senator Stevens was still there, it would not have become law.
In the following month after Senator Stevens’ untimely death, in September of 2010, a young DOJ lawyer, Nicholas Marsh who had been involved in the Stevens case, committed suicide at his home as the investigation into the fraudulently created case continued. The report expressed, “no conclusion as to his (Marsh’s) conduct,” given his untimely death. Robert Luskin, an attorney for Marsh, said, “he tried to do the right thing.” []
If you wonder what happened to the valuable FBI agent who was an upstanding whistleblower with a conscience, you should know that in Mueller’s FBI, Special Agent Joy was terribly mistreated. Orders came down from on high that he was not to participate in any criminal investigation again, which is the FBI management’s way of forcing an agent out of the FBI. On the other hand, the FBI agent who was said to have manufactured evidence against Senator Stevens while hiding evidence of his innocence was treated wonderfully and continued to work important criminal cases for Director Mueller.
If you wonder if mistreatment of an FBI agent who exposed impropriety was an anomaly
in Mueller’s FBI, the Alaska Dispatch noted this about another case: [ employed/2012/06/07/]
“Former FBI agent Jane Turner was treated much like Joy (the whistleblower agent in the Stevens case) after she blew the whistle on fellow agents who had taken valuable mementos from Ground Zero following the 9-11 terrorist attacks. She took the FBI to court over her treatment and ended up winning her case against the agency after a jury trial. When you blow the whistle on the FBI, ‘it’s death by a million paper cuts,’ she told Alaska Dispatch. Turner said that agents who violate the FBI’s omerta — those who internally challenge the agency — are undercut and isolated. ‘They (Mueller’s FBI supervisors) do everything they can to get you to quit’ she said.”

DEATH OF DR. STEVEN HATFILL’S REPUTATION AND PRODUCTIVE LIFE Here is how Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist described this combination
Mueller/Comey debacle:
“The FBI absolutely bungled its investigation into the Anthrax attacker who struck after the 9-11 terrorist attacks. Carl Cannon goes through this story well, and it’s worth reading for how it involves both Comey and his dear ‘friend’ and current special counsel Robert Mueller. The FBI tried — in the media — its case against Hatfill. Their actual case ended up being thrown out by the courts:
Comey and Mueller badly bungled the biggest case they ever handled. They botched the investigation of the 2001 anthrax letter attacks that took five lives and infected 17 other people, shut down the U.S. Capitol and Washington’s mail system, solidified the Bush administration’s antipathy for Iraq, and eventually, when the facts finally came out, made the FBI look feckless, incompetent, and easily manipulated by outside political pressure.
More from the Carl Cannon cited above, recounting how disastrous the attempt to convict Dr. Steven Hatfill for a crime he didn’t commit was:
In truth, Hatfill was an implausible suspect from the outset. He was a virologist who never handled anthrax, which is a bacterium. (Ivins, by contrast, shared ownership of anthrax patents, was diagnosed as having paranoid personality disorder, and had a habit of stalking and threatening people with anonymous letters – including the woman who provided the long-ignored tip to the FBI). So what evidence did the FBI have against Hatfill? There was none, so the agency did a Hail Mary, importing two bloodhounds from California whose handlers claimed could sniff the scent of the killer on the anthrax-tainted letters. These dogs were shown to Hatfill, who promptly petted them. When the dogs responded favorably, their handlers told the FBI that they’d “alerted” on Hatfill and that he must be the killer.

Unfortunately, both Mueller and Comey were absolutely and totally convinced of the innocent man’s guilt. They ruined his life, his relationship with friends, neighbors and potential employers.
And from Carl Cannon, Real Clear Politics: [ 3953.html]
You’d think that any good FBI agent would have kicked these quacks in the fanny and found their dogs a good home. Or at least checked news accounts of criminal cases in California where these same dogs had been used against defendants who’d been convicted — and later exonerated. As Pulitzer Prize-winning Los Angeles Times investigative reporter David Willman detailed in his authoritative book on the case, a California judge who’d tossed out a murder conviction based on these sketchy canines called the prosecution’s dog handler “as biased as any witness that this court has ever seen.”
Instead, Mueller, who micromanaged the anthrax case and fell in love with the dubious dog evidence, and personally assured Ashcroft and presumably George W. Bush that in Steven Hatfill, the bureau had its man…
Mueller didn’t exactly distinguish himself with contrition, either. In 2008, after Ivins committed suicide as he was about to be apprehended for his crimes, and the Justice Department had formally exonerated Hatfill – and paid him $5.82 million in a legal settlement ($2.82+150,000/yr. for 20 yrs) – Mueller could not be bothered to walk across the street to attend the press conference announcing the case’s resolution. When reporters did ask him about it, Mueller was graceless. “I do not apologize for any aspect of the investigation,” he said, adding that it would be erroneous “to say there were mistakes.”
Though FBI jurisdiction has its limitations, Mueller’s ego does not.
Mueller and Comey’s next target in the Anthrax case was Dr. Bruce Ivins. As the FBI was closing in and preparing to give him the ultimate Hatfill treatment, Dr. Ivins took his own life. Though Mueller and Comey were every bit as convinced that Dr. Ivins was the Anthrax culprit as they were that Dr. Hatfill was, there are lingering questions about whether or not there was a case beyond a reasonable doubt. Since Dr. Ivins is deceased

and had some mental issues, we are expected to simply accept that he was definitely the Anthrax killer and drop the whole matter. That’s a difficult ask after taxpayer money paid off Mueller’s previous victim. Mueller had relentlessly dogged Dr. Hatfill using life- destroying, Orwellian tactics. Either Mueller was wrong when he said it would be a mistake, “to say there were mistakes,” in the railroading of Hatfill or Mueller did intentionally and knowingly persecute an innocent man.
In 2003, during yet another fabricated and politically-charged FBI investigation, this one
“searching” for the leak of CIA agent Valery Plame’s identity to the media. Robert Mueller’s very dear close friend James Comey was at the time serving as the Deputy Attorney General. Comey convinced then Attorney General John Ashcroft that he should recuse himself from the Plame investigation. At the time, Ashcroft was in the hospital.
Scooter Libby
After Deputy A.G. Comey was successful in securing Ashcroft’s recusal, Comey then got to choose the Special Counsel. He then looked about for someone who was completely

independent of any relationships that might affect his independence and settled upon his own child’s godfather and named Patrick Fitzgerald to investigate the source of the leak. So much for the independence of the Special Counsel.
The entire episode was further revealed as a fraud when it was later made public that Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald, FBI Director Mueller, and Deputy Attorney Comey had very early on learned that the source of Plame’s identity leak came from Richard Armitage. But neither Comey nor Mueller nor Fitzgerald wanted Armitage’s scalp. Oh no. These so-called apolitical, fair-minded pursuers of their own brand of justice were after a bigger name in the Bush administration like Vice President Dick Cheney or Karl Rove. Yet they knew from the beginning that these two men were not guilty of anything.
Nonetheless, Fitzgerald, Mueller and Comey pursued Cheney’s chief of staff, Scooter Libby, as a path to ensnare the Vice President. According to multiple reports, Fitzgerald had twice offered to drop all charges against Libby if he would ‘deliver’ Cheney to him. There was nothing to deliver.
Is any of this sounding familiar? Could it be that these same tactics have been used against an innocent Gen. Mike Flynn? Could it be that Flynn only agreed to plead guilty to prevent any family members from being unjustly prosecuted and to also prevent going completely broke from attorneys’ fees? That’s the apparent Mueller-Comey- Special Counsel distinctive modus-operandi.
Libby would not lie about Cheney, so he was prosecuted for obstruction of justice,
perjury, making a false statement. This Spectator report in 2015 sums up this particularly
egregious element of the railroading: [ and-the-trouble-with-special-prosecutors/]
“… By the time Scooter Libby was tried in 2007 it wasn’t for anything to do with the Plame leak — everyone then knew Armitage had taken responsibility for that — but for lying to federal officials about what he had said to three reporters, including Miller.
It is relating to this part of the story that an extraordinary new piece of information has come to light. After her spell in prison, and with her job on the line, Miller was eventually worn down to agree to hand over some redacted portions of notes of her few conversations with Libby. Several years on, she could no longer recall where she had first heard of Plame’s CIA identity, but her notes included a reference to Wilson alongside which the journalist had added in

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 1.58.54 PM

brackets ‘wife works in Bureau?’ After Fitzgerald went through these notes it was put to Miller that this showed that the CIA identity of Plame had been raised by Libby during the noted meeting. At Libby’s trial Miller was the only reporter to state that Libby had discussed Plame. His conviction and his sentencing to 30 months in prison and a $250,000 fine, rested on this piece of evidence.
But Miller has just published her memoirs. One detail in particular stands out. Since the Libby trial, Miller has read Plame’s own memoir and there discovered that Plame had worked at a State Department bureau as cover for her real CIA role. The discovery, in Miller’s words, ‘left her cold’. The idea that the ‘Bureau’ in her notebook meant ‘CIA’ had been planted in her head by Fitzgerald. It was a strange word to use for the CIA. Reading Plame’s memoir, Miller realized that ‘Bureau’ was in brackets because it related to her working at State Department. (Emphasis added)
What that means is that Scooter Libby had not lied as she originally thought and testified. He was innocent of everything including the contrived offense. For his honesty and innocence, Scooter Libby spent time behind bars, and still has a federal felony conviction he carries like an albatross.
The real culprit of the allegation for which the Special Counsel was appointed, and massive amounts of tax payer dollars expended was Richard Armitage. A similar technique was used against Martha Stewart. After all, Mueller’s FBI developed both cases. If the desired crime to be prosecuted was never committed, then talk to someone you want to convict until you find something that others are willing to say was not true. Then you can convict them of lying to the FBI. Martha Stewart found out about Mueller’s FBI the hard way. Unfortunately, Mueller has left a wake of innocent people whom he has crowned with criminal records.
History does seem to repeat itself when it is recording the same people using the same tactics. Can anyone who has ever actually looked at Robert Mueller’s history honestly say that Mueller deserves a sterling reputation in law enforcement? One part of his reputation he does apparently deserve is the reputation for being James Comey’s mentor.

In 2011, in one of the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight hearings, FBI Director Mueller repeatedly testified during questioning by various Members about how the
Muslim community was just like every other religious community in the United States. He also referenced an “Outreach Program” the FBI had with the Muslim community.
When it was my turn to question, I could not help but put the two points of his testimony together for a purge question: [ ]
GOHMERT: Thank you, Director. I see you had mentioned earlier, and it’s in your written statement, that the FBI’s developed extensive outreach to Muslim communities and in answer to an earlier question I understood you to say that you know Muslim communities were like all other communities, so I’m curious as the result of the extensive outreach program the FBI’s had to the Muslim community, how is your outreach program going with the Baptists and the Catholics?
MUELLER: I’m not certain of, necessarily the rest of that, the question I would say — there are outreach to all segments of a particular city or county or society is good.
GOHMERT: Well do you have a particular program of outreach to Hindus, Buddhists, Jewish community, agnostics or is it just an extensive outreach program to –
MUELLER: We have outreach to every one of those communities.
GOHMERT: And how do you do that?
MUELLER: Every one of those communities can be affected can be affected by facts or circumstance.
GOHMERT: I’ve looked extensively, and I haven’t seen anywhere in any one from the FBI’s letters, information that there’s been an extensive outreach program to any other community trying to develop trust in this kind of relationship and it makes me wonder if there is an issue of

trust or some problem like that that the FBI has seen in that particular community.
MUELLER: I would say if you look at one of our more effective tools or what we call citizens academies where we bring in individuals from a variety of segments of the territory in which the office operates . . . look at the citizens’ academy, the persons here, they are a cross- section of the community, they can be Muslim, could be Indian, they can be Baptists –
GOHMERT: Okay but no specific programs to any of those. You have extensive outreach to Muslim community and then you have a program of outreach to communities in general is what it sounds like.
Congressman Louie Gohmert
We went further in the questioning. The 2007 trial of the Holy Land Foundation, the largest terrorism financing trial in American history, linked the Council on American- Islamic Relations (CAIR) to the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas. CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case. Because of this affiliation, the FBI

issued policy and guidance to restrict its non-investigative interactions with CAIR in an effort to limit CAIR’s ability to exploit contacts with the FBI. As a result, FBI field offices were instructed to cut ties with all local branches of CAIR across the country.
GOHMERT: Are you aware of the evidence in the Holy Land Foundation case that linked the Council on American-Islamic relations, CAIR, the Islamic Society of North America and the North America Islamic Trust to the Holy Land Foundation?
MUELLER: I’m not going to speak to specific information in a particular case. I would tell you on the other hand that we do not –
GOHMERT: Are you aware of the case, Director? [CROSSTALK]
MUELLER: – relationship with CAIR because of concerns –
GOHMERT: Well I’ve got the letter from the Assistant Director Richard Powers that says in light of the evidence – talking about during the trial – evidence was introduced that demonstrated a relationship among CAIR, individual CAIR founders, including its current president emeritus and executive director and the Palestine committee, evidence was also introduced that demonstrated a relationship between the Palestine committee and Hamas, which was designated as a terrorist organization in 1995. In light of that evidence, he says, the FBI suspended all formal contacts between CAIR and FBI. Well now it’s my understanding, and I’ve got documentation, and I hope you’ve seen this kind of documentation before, it’s public record, and also the memo order from the judge in turning down a request that the unindicted co-conspirators be eliminated from the list, and he says the FBI’s information is clear there is a tie here, and I’m not going to grant the deletion of these particular parties as unindicted co- conspirators. So, I’m a little surprised that you’re reluctant to discuss something that’s already been set out in an order, that’s already been in a letter saying we cut ties in light of the evidence at this trial. I’m just surprised it took the evidence that the FBI had, being introduced at the trial in order to sever the relationships with CAIR that it (the FBI) had that showed going back to the 1993 meeting in Philadelphia, what

was tied to a terrorist organization. So, I welcome your comments about that.
MUELLER: As I told you before, we have no formal relationship with CAIR because of concerns with regard to the national leadership on that.
What Director Mueller was intentionally deceptive about was that the FBI had apparently maintained a relationship and even “community partnership” instigated on his watch with CAIR and other groups and individuals that his FBI had evidence showing they were co-conspirators to terrorism. That, of course, is consistent with his misrepresentation that Mueller’s FBI had outreach programs to other religious communities just like they did with the Muslim community. They did not. He was not honest about it.
In a March 2009 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) questioned Mueller over the FBI move to cut off contact with CAIR. Mueller responded to Kyl’s pressing over how the policy was to be handled by FBI field offices and headquarters with the following: []
MUELLER: We try to adapt, when we have situations where we have an issue with one or more individuals, as opposed to institution, or an institution, large, to identify the specificity of those particular individuals or issues that need to be addressed.
We will generally have — individuals may have some maybe leaders in the community who we have no reason to believe whatsoever are involved in terrorism, but may be affiliated, in some way, shape or form, with an institution about which there is some concern, and which we have to work out a separate arrangement.
We have to be sensitive to both the individuals, as well as the organization, and try to resolve the issues that may prevent us from working with a particular organization.
KYL: They try to “adapt” with members of terror-related groups? Are they as “sensitive” with other organizations? Do they work out “separate arrangements” with members of, say, the Mafia or the Ku Klux Klan for “community outreach”? Why the special treatment for radical Islamic terrorism?

A March 2012 review of FBI field office compliance with this policy by the Office of Inspector General found a discrepancy between the FBI’s enforcement policy restricting contact and interaction with CAIR and its resulting actions. Rather than FBI headquarters enforcing the rules, they hedged. Mueller set up a separate cover through the Office of Public Affairs and allowed them to work together, despite the terrorist connections.
That was the cultivated atmosphere of Mueller’s FBI.
The DOJ actually set out in writing in an indictment that CAIR and some of the people Mueller was coddling were supporters of terrorism. I had understood that the plan by the Bush Justice Department was that if they got convictions of the principals in the Holy Land Foundation trial, they would come right back after the co-conspirators who were named in the indictment as co-conspirators but who were not formally indicted.
In late 2008, the DOJ got convictions against all those formally indicted, so DOJ could then move forward with formally indicting and convicting the rest—EXCEPT that the November 2008 election meant it was now going to be the OBAMA DOJ with Eric Holder leading. The newly-named but not confirmed Attorney General apparently made clear they were not going to pursue any of the named co-conspirators.
That itself was a major loss for the United States in its war against terrorism in the Obama administration. It was a self-inflicted refusal to go after and defeat our enemies. All of the named co-conspirators would not likely have been formally indicted, but certainly there was evidence to support the allegations against some of them, as the federal district court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had formally found.
One of the problems with FBI Director Mueller is that he had already been cozying up to named co-conspirators with evidence in hand of their collusion with terrorists. That probably was an assurance to President Obama and Attorney General Holder that Mueller would fit right in to the Obama administration. He did. It also helps explain why President Obama and AG Holder wanted him to serve and extra two years as FBI Director. Mueller was their kind of guy. Unfortunately for America, he truly was!
We repeatedly see cases where people were radicalized, came on the FBI radar, but the federal agents were looking for Islamophobe Americans, not for the islamic jihad terrorists standing in front of them who first of all had come into our country as illegal aliens, and were now planning how to kill a great number of us.

That is because Mueller’s demand of his FBI Agents, in the Obama-Clinton “New Age” to which he brought them single handedly — was to look for Islamophobes.

Screen Shot 2018-07-14 at 6.43.44 PM

If a Mueller-trained FBI agent got a complaint about a potential radical Islamist who may pose a threat, the agent must immediately recognize that the one complaining is most likely an Islamophobe. That means the agent should first investigate whether the complainant is guilty of a hate crime.
Too often it was AFTER an attack occurred that Mueller-trained FBI agents would decide that there really was a radical Islamic threat to the United States. The blinding of our FBI agents to the domestic threat of radical Islam is part of the beguiling damage Robert Mueller did as FBI Director. That is also the kind of damage that got Americans killed, even though Mueller may have avoided offending the radical Islamists who were killing Americans.
As terrorism expert Patrick Poole continually points out in his “Known Wolf” series, the
overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil are committed by those the FBI
has interviewed and dismissed as a threat. Here are three of the more high-profile cases:
[ obamas-watch/]
ORLANDO: The mass killer who attacked the Pulse nightclub in June 2016, Omar Mateen, had been interviewed by the FBI on THREE separate occasions.
The open preliminary investigation in 2013 lasted 10 months, after Mateen had told others about mutual acquaintances he shared with the Boston bombers and had made extremist statements.
He was investigated again in 2014 for his contacts with a suicide bomber who attended the same mosque.
At one point, Mateen was placed on TWO separate terrorism databases.
He was later removed from them.
NORTHWEST AIRLINES: Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarded Detroit- bound Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day 2009 with 289 other passengers wearing an underwear bomb intended to murder them all.
He was well-known to U.S. intelligence officials before he boarded.

Only one month before the attempted bombing, Abdulmutallab’s father had actually gone to the U.S. embassy in Nigeria and met with two CIA officers.
He directly told the CIA that he was concerned about his son’s extremism.
Abdulmutallab’s name was added to the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) database.
However, his name was not added the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Database. Or even the no-fly list. So, he boarded a plane.
When asked about the near-takedown of the flight and these missteps, then-Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano remarkably told CNN that “the system worked.”
The only “system” that worked in this incident: a culture that values bravery, already instilled in the passengers who acted.
BOSTON: Prior to the bombing of the Boston Marathon by Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in April 2013 that killed three people and injured 264 others, the FBI had been tipped off.
Russian intelligence warned that Tamerlan was “a follower of radical Islam.”
Initially, the FBI denied ever meeting with Tamerlan. They later claimed that they followed up on the lead, couldn’t find anything in their databases linking him to terrorism, and quickly closed the case.
After the second Russian warning, Tamerlan’s file was flagged by federal authorities demanding “mandatory” detention if he attempted to leave or re-enter the United States.
But Tsarnaev’s name was misspelled when it was entered into the database.

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 1.58.19 PM

An internal FBI report of the handling of the Tsarnaev’s case — unsurprisingly — saw the FBI exonerate itself.
When I asked at yet another House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, Mueller himself admitted in response to my questioning, that the FBI had indeed gone to the Boston mosque the bombers attended. Of course, The FBI did not go to investigate the Tsarnaevs.
The bombers’ mosque, the Islamic Society of Boston, was incorporated by known and convicted terrorists. The incorporation papers were signed by none other than Abduram Al-Amoudi who is currently serving 23 years in a federal prison for funding terrorism. One of the members of the Board of Trustees included a leader of the International Muslim Brotherhood, Yusef al-Qawadari, who is barred from entering the United States due to his terrorist ties.
Did Mueller’s FBI go to the Boston bombers’ mosque to investigate the Tsarnaevs? This is from the House Judiciary oversight hearing transcript:
GOHMERT: The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks. If the Russians tell you that someone has been radicalized and you go check and see the mosque that they went to, then you get the articles of incorporation, as I have, for the group that created the Boston mosque where these Tsarnaevs attended, and you find out the name Al-Amoudi, which you will remember, because while you were FBI Director this man who was so helpful to the Clinton administration with so many big things, he gets arrested at Dulles Airport by the FBI and he is now doing over 20 years for supporting terrorism.
This is the guy that started the mosque where the Tsarnaevs were attending, and you didn’t even bother to go check about the mosque? And then when you have the pictures, why did no one go to the mosque and say, who are these guys? They may attend here. Why was that not done since such a thorough job was done?
MUELLER: Your facts are not altogether—— GOHMERT: Point out specifically.
MUELLER: May I finish my——

GOHMERT: Point out specifically. Sir, if you’re going to call me a liar, you need to point out specifically where any facts are wrong.
MUELLER: We went to the mosque prior to Boston.
GOHMERT: Prior to Boston?
MUELLER: Prior to Boston happening, we were in that mosque talking to the imam several months beforehand as part of our outreach efforts.
“Outreach efforts”? Yes. That is apparently Mueller’s efforts to play figurative patty- cake with the leaders and tell them how wonderful they are and how crazy all those Islamaphobes out there are, but they surely got assurance that Mueller’s FBI is after those bigots. Maybe they sat around on the floor and had a really nice meal together. One thing for certain, they weren’t asking about the Tsarnaevs! But the hearing got even worse:
GOHMERT: Were you aware that those mosques were started by Al-Amoudi?
MUELLER. I’ve answered the question, sir.
GOHMERT. You didn’t answer the question. Were you aware that they were started by Al-Amoudi?
MUELLER. No. . .
Then my time for questioning expired, leaving many questions unanswered. Why was the FBI unaware of the origins of the mosque attended by the Boston bombers? This was arguably the most traumatic Islamic terrorist attack in America since 9-11 because the explosions happened on live television at the Boston Marathon. When did the FBI become an outreach-to-terrorism organization to the detriment and disregard of its investigations? Under Director Robert Mueller’s tenure, that’s when!
In Director Mueller’s efforts to appease and please the named co-conspirators of terrorism, he was keenly attuned to their complaints that the FBI training materials on radical Islam said some things about Islamic terrorists that offended some Muslims. Never mind that the main offense was done to the American people by radical Islamists who wanted to kill Americans and destroy our way of life. Mueller wanted to make these

co-conspirators feel good toward Mueller and to let them know he was pleased to appease.
Director Mueller had all of the training materials regarding radical Islam “purged” of anything that might offend radical Islamic terrorists. So, in addition to using his “Five Year Up-or-Out” policy to force out so many experienced FBI agents who had been properly trained to identify radical Islamic terrorists, now Mueller was going even further. He was ensuring that new FBI agents would not know what to look for when assessing potentially radicalized individuals.
When some of us in Congress learned of the Mueller-mandated “purge” of FBI training materials, we demanded to see what was being removed. Unfortunately, Mueller was well experienced in covering his tracks, so naturally the pages of training materials that were purged were ordered to be “classified,” so most people would never get to see them.
After many terrorist attacks, we would hear that the FBI had the Islamic terrorists on their radar but failed to identify them. Now you are beginning to see why FBI agents could not spot them. They were looking more at the complainant than they were at the radical Islamist because that is what Mueller had them trained to do.
Michele Bachmann and I were extremely upset that Americans were being killed because of the terribly flawed training. We demanded to see the material that was “purged” from the training of FBI agents regarding radical Islam. That is when we were told it could not be sent over for review because the purged material was “classified.”
We were authorized to review classified material, so we demanded to see it anyway. We were willing to go over to the FBI office or the DOJ, but we wanted to review the material. We were told they would bring it over and let us review it in the Rayburn Building in a protected setting. They finally agreed to produce the material. Members of Congress Michele Bachmann, Lynn Westmoreland, and I went to the little room to review the vast amount of material. Lynn was not able to stay as long as Michele and I did, but we started pouring through the notebooks of materials.
It was classified so naturally I am not allowed to disclose any specifics, but we were surprised at the amount of material that was purged from training our agents. Some of the items that were strictly for illustration or accentuation were removed. A few were silly. But some should clearly have been left in if an FBI agent was going to know how and what a radical Islamic terrorist thinks, and what milestone had been reached in the

radicalization process. It was clear to Michele and me as we went through the purged materials that some of the material really did need to be taught to our FBI agents.
For those densely-headed or radical activists who will wrongly proclaim that what I am writing is an Islamophobic complaint, please note that I have never said that all Muslims are terrorists. I have never said that, because all Muslims are NOT terrorists. But for the minority who are, we have to actually learn exactly what they study and learn how they think.
As Patton made clear after defeating Rommel’s tanks in World War II, he studied his enemy, what he believed and how he thought. In the movie, “Patton,” he loudly proclaims, “Rommel, you magnificent ___, I read your book!” That is how an enemy is defeated. You study what they believe, how they think, what they know. Failure to do so is precisely why so many “Known Wolves” are able to attack us. Clearly, Mueller weakened our ability to recognize a true radical Islamic terrorist. As one of my friends in our U.S. Intelligence said, “We have blinded ourselves of the ability to see our enemy! You cannot defeat an enemy you cannot define.” Robert Mueller deserves a significant amount of the credit for the inability of our federal agents to define our enemy.
FBI Special Agent Kim Jensen had spent a great deal of his adult life studying radical
Islam. He is personally responsible for some extraordinary undercover work that remains classified to this day. He was tasked with putting together a program to train our more experienced FBI agents to locate and identify radicalized Muslims on the threshold of violence. Jensen had done this well before Mueller began to cozy up with and pander to groups such as CAIR.
Complaints by similar groups caused Mueller to once again demand that our agents could not be properly instructed on radical Islam. Accordingly, Jensen’s approximately 700-pages of advanced training material on radical Islam were eliminated from FBI training and all copies were ordered destroyed. When Director Mueller decides he wants our federal agents to be blind and ignorant of radical Islam, they are indeed going to be blind and ignorant.
Fortunately, in changing times well after Mueller’s departure as FBI Director, a new request went out to Mr. Jensen to recreate that work because at least someone in the FBI needed to know what traits to look for in a terrorist. It still did not undo the years of damage from Mueller’s commanded ignorance of radical Islam.

Screen Shot 2018-07-26 at 10.59.43 PM

MUELLER’S UNETHICAL ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR Robert Mueller had more than one direct conflict of interest that should have
prohibited him from serving as the Special Counsel to investigate President Donald Trump. For one thing, President Trump fired his close friend and confidante, disgraced FBI Director James Comey. Mueller had long served as a mentor to Comey, who would most certainly be a critical witness in any investigation of Donald Trump. Mueller and Comey had also been exceedingly close friends beyond the mentor relationship. But Comey’s insertion of himself into so much of the election cycle and even its aftermath in conversations he had with the President himself made him a critical witness in the investigation. There is no way Mueller could sit in judgment of his dear, close friend’s credibility, and certainly no way he should be allowed to do so.
Gregg Jarrett explained one aspect of this situation quite clearly and succinctly at in an article titled, “Gregg Jarrett: Are Mueller and Comey ‘Colluding’ against Trump by acting as co-special counsel?” A portion of that article said the following:
The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits Mueller from serving if he has a “conflict of interest.” Even the appearance of a conflict is disallowed.
The same Code of Federal Regulations defines what constitutes a conflict. That is, “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution” (28 CFR 45.2). Comey is that person. He was substantially involved in the conversation with President Trump who may be the subject of an obstruction investigation. In fact, the former Director is the only other person involved. There were no witnesses beyond himself.
A conflict of interest is a situation in which an individual has competing interests or loyalties. Here, it sets up a clash between the special counsel’s self-interest or bias and his professional or public interest in discharging his responsibilities in a fair, objective and impartial manner. His close association with the star witness raises the likelihood of prejudice or favoritism which is anathema to the fair administration of justice.

Mueller has no choice but to disqualify himself. The law affords him no discretion because the recusal is mandatory in its language. It does not say “may” or “can” or “might”. It says the special counsel “shall” recuse himself in such instances.
An excellent post by Robert Barnes, a constitutional lawyer, identifies five statutes, regulations and codes of conduct that Mueller is violating because of his conflict of interest with Comey. Byron York, chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner recounts in detail the close personal relationship between Mueller and Comey
which gives rise to the blatant conflict of interest. [ acting-in-concert-as-co-special-counsel.html]
Another deeply troubling aspect of Mueller’s conflict of interest is and was his role in the investigation of Russia’s effort to illegally gain control of a substantial part of United States’ precious supply of uranium. That investigation was taking place within the Mueller FBI, which should have had a direct effect on prohibiting Secretary of State Clinton from participating in the approval of the uranium sale into the hands that were ultimately the Russian government.

Screen Shot 2018-06-29 at 8.42.10 AM
Of course, then U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein had direct control over that Russia- uranium investigation in conjunction with FBI Director Mueller. It certainly appears that with what they had gleaned from that undercover investigation, they should never have been involved in any subsequent investigation that might touch on potential collusion and millions of dollars paid to the Clinton’s foundation by the very beneficiaries of the Russians’ uranium schemes. Rosenstein and Mueller’s failure to warn against or stop the sale reeks of its own form of collusion, cooperation, or capitulation in what some consider a treasonous sale.
Quite the interesting little duo now in charge of all things investigatory surrounding their own actions. In fact, Rosenstein and Mueller are now in a position to dissuade others from pursuing THEM for their own conduct.

Through it all, Mueller’s modus operandi does not seem to have ever changed. He has hired nine Democrat-supporting lawyers and NO Republicans. Sure, all attorneys likely
have political views and that is not a problem so long as they do not affect their job. But not a single Republican was worthy of Mueller’s selection? Were there no establishment Republicans who wanted to join him in railroading President Trump?
Mueller’s hand-picked team of Democrats reveal political views that distinctly conflict with Trump and the conservative agenda, raising questions about Mueller’s bias and his ability to conduct a fair investigation. At least nine members of Mueller’s team made significant contributions to Democrats or Democratic campaigns, while none contributed to Trump’s campaign and only James Quarles contributed to Republicans in a drastically smaller amount than what he gave to Democrats.
Analysis of Federal Election Commission records shows that Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, Andrew Goldstein, James Quarles, Elizabeth Prelogar, Greg Andres, Brandon Van Grack, Rush Atkinson, and Kyle Freeny all contributed over $50,000 in donations to Democrats including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s Presidential campaigns, various Democratic non-presidential candidates, and the Democratic National Convention.
Mueller also has surprisingly strong personal ties to a number of the lawyers he hired. Three former partners with Mueller at the Boston law firm of WilmerHale are on the payroll: Aaron Zebley, Jeannie Rhee, and James Quarles.
In addition to strong personal ties to Mueller, many of the attorneys have potential conflicts in working for persons directly connected to the people and issues being investigated. Jeannie Rhee represented Ben Rhodes, ex-Obama National Security Adviser, and the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering lawsuit, as well as Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit probing her private emails.
Aaron Zebley, former Chief of Staff to Mueller while Director of the FBI, represented Justin Cooper in the Clinton email scandal as he was responsible for setting up Clinton’s private email server. He admitted to physically damaging Clinton’s old mobile devices.
Andrew Goldstein joined the team after working under major Trump critic Preet Bharara in the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York. Bharara became a strong critic after Trump fired him as an Obama-holdover and spoke on ABC News that “there’s absolutely

evidence to launch an obstruction of justice case against Trump’s team with regard to the Russia probe.” Does he sound a bit prejudiced?
Andrew Weissman, notoriously a “tough” prosecutor previously accused of “prosecutorial overreach,” has a less than stellar career after various courts reversed his prosecutions due to his questionable conduct and tactics. As director of the Enron Task Force, Weissman shattered the Arthur Andersen LLP accounting firm and destroyed over 85,000 jobs. In 2005, the conviction was reversed by the Supreme Court. In other words, the only true crime in the case was the murderous destruction of 85,000 jobs and the lives they ruined.

Weissman’s next conviction threw four Merrill Lynch executives into prison without bail for a year, only to be reversed by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. Weissman subsequently resigned from the Enron Task Force. A suspiciously timely move, as the public eye had just caught sight of his modus operandi.
Additionally, Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s election- night celebration in New York City. He also sent an email to Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. President Trump was trying to enforce the law; Weisman was trying to enforce his bigotry against Trump and Republicans.

Peter Strzok was removed from Mueller’s team after more than 10,000 texts between him and former Mueller investigator Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti-Trump tirades. They were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming President and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected.

Michael Flynn is a man who was caught up in manufactured controversy from the moment he stepped into his role in the Trump administration. The circumstances surrounding his take-down have become one of the more puzzling aspects of the Trump- Russia investigation.
His career took him from three decades in the U.S. Army to overseeing the Pentagon’s military intelligence operation and directing the Defense Intelligence Agency. Flynn was more than qualified to act as the first national security adviser in a new administration. However, his influence and zeal made him a clear target for the Trump-Russia investigation.

Screen Shot 2018-06-28 at 11.41.23 PM
As a strong supporter and friend of Donald Trump’s from the onset, he campaigned and publicly supported then-candidate Trump throughout 2016.
As best I can sort it out through the media hype and hysteria, having no first-hand knowledge like the rest of America: after the successful election, during the transition period, in December 2016, Flynn reportedly conversed with a Russian ambassador. He was “accidentally” swept up in an intelligence foreign surveillance recording. When this happens, the names of American citizens are supposed to be masked in the transcripts. Somehow Flynn’s name was magically unmasked, which apparently allowed the Obama administration to peruse his meetings and conversations.
Parts of the classified transcript of that conversation were leaked to the media by rogue Deep State law breakers (criminals who Mueller seems completely disinterested in). This appears to be what fueled the media-driven narrative of Trump campaign “collusion” with Russia because Flynn had a discussion with a Russian ambassador, which conversation is absolutely legal and advisable.
A media-generated doubt clouded Flynn’s reputation, as the discussion was long- reported as having taken place during the campaign (which could possibly be illegal) but was later proven to have been after the election and during the transition which should not have been illegal.
After a complete pounding of media-driven hysteria, in mid-February of 2017, Flynn resigned having served only 23 days as National Security Advisor. Mueller targeted Flynn using illicitly-gathered and leaked foreign intelligence and surveillance as evidence.
Nine months later after Flynn and his family were subjected to Mueller’s usual threats and intimidation, a financially exhausted Flynn entered a guilty plea on one count of lying to the FBI—the result of a Mueller-technique perjury trap as was used on Scooter Libby and Martha Stewart.
What is Flynn guilty of? He apparently misremembered a conversation that took place 33 days previously? The FBI had a transcript of that conversation and already knew what information was there. They went into a conversation with Flynn not seeking answers to questions, but to try to trip him up on exact statements made in a conversation when they were already in possession of the transcript.
Flynn’s unmasking has become the center of a controversy wherein those transcripts were procured under exceedingly questionable circumstances before a judge who had a questionable and undisclosed relationship with part of Mueller’s team. That judge was

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 1.50.01 PM

appointed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), the secretive court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that allows federal law enforcement to seek secretive warrants to surveil foreign persons outside of the United States who are suspected of terrorism.
But the Obama administration and Mueller seemed to find it much more politically expedient to use the secret court to go after Americans who were part of the Trump team for actions that did not occur while they were part of the Trump campaign team. Strange goings-on.
One could argue that Judge Rudolph Contreras, the federal judge who accepted Flynn’s guilty plea, conveniently misremembered that he also served on the FISA court as a judge and conveniently misremembered his friendship with the FBI agent whose interview was used as evidence against Flynn.
As it turns out, the FBI interview notes of that very encounter with Flynn may exonerate Michael Flynn, crushing Mueller’s case against him, not to mention the highly questionable hearing before a judge who may well have been recused much too late to save the Flynn prosecution.
The FISA-authorized FISC is built upon the principle that highly delicate cases dealing with government surveillance of foreign agents and officials would be handled in an unbiased and respectful environment where secrecy at all costs was critical. There is supposed to be an added precaution to prevent any potential for bias in a FISA Judge by having a rotation of judges. That is why it is such a shock to find out now that Mueller’s case against Michael Flynn would happen to end up before the “randomly selected” very dear close personal friend of FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, who hated President Trump with a passion, as evidenced in his text messages with colleague and paramour, Lisa Page.
U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, or “Rudy” as Strzok likes to refer to him, should have recused himself from such a highly sensitive case involving the ultimate attempted removal of the duly-elected President of the United States who happened to be despised by the very people who by law were required to prosecute with fairness. He was later forced to ‘recuse’ himself and be removed from the Flynn proceedings, without public explanation.

This forced recusal was an unmistakable indication that he never should have been involved in the Michael Flynn plea agreement. Judge Contreras’ conflict of interest has yet to be explained by the court.
Contreras’ is one of only three local FISA court judges, and by default, is likely one of the judges who have on four occasions approved the Title I surveillance of another character in this melodrama, Carter Page. This is the case where the FBI is known to have intentionally misled the FISA court by using as evidence the illustrious “Steele Dossier,” a sordid opposition research document paid for by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Oh, what a tangled web of crime Special Prosecutor Mueller’s team appears to have helped weave, and of which Mueller appears to be completely disinterested, all while he searches high and low for an elusive crime to pin on the President.
Strategically timed leaks of selective classified information are being used to target individuals for investigation in order to create the appearance of some sinister crime having been committed. Upon closer scrutiny, the cases fall apart. Yet, slam dunk federal criminal cases of leaking classified material are going on under Mueller’s nose, and by those within his purview and his team. When we think of all the leaks from Mueller’s investigation, it brings to mind Wilford Brimley’s quote from Absence of Malice: “You call what’s goin’ on around here a leak? Boy, the last time there was a leak like this, Noah built hisself a boat.”
Case in point: Eric Prince.
As Lee Smith put it in a recent article from, Robert Mueller’s Beltway Cover-Up:
News that special counselor Robert Mueller has turned his attention to Erik Prince’s January 11, 2017 meeting in the Seychelles with a Russian banker, a Lebanese-American political fixer, and officials from the United Arab Emirates, helps clarify the nature of Mueller’s work. It’s not an investigation that the former director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is leading—rather, it’s a cover-up…
Mueller is said to believe that the Prince meeting was to set up a back channel with the Kremlin. But that makes no sense. According

to the foundational text of the collusion narrative, the dossier allegedly written by former British spy Christopher Steele, the Kremlin had cultivated Trump himself for years. So what’s the purpose of a back channel, when Vladimir Putin already had a key to the front door of Mar-a-Lago?
Further, the collusion thesis holds that the Trump circle teamed with high-level Russian officials for the purpose of winning the 2016 election. How does a meeting that Erik Prince had a week before Trump’s inauguration advance the crooked election victory plot? It doesn’t—it contradicts it.
The writer goes on to point out that serious crimes have been committed that Mueller is purposefully ignoring.
Prince was thrown into the middle of Russiagate after an April 3, 2017, Washington Post story reported his meeting with the Russian banker. But how did anyone know about the meeting?
After the story came out, Prince said he was shown “specific evidence” by sources from the intelligence community that the information was swept up in the collection of electronic communications and his identity was unmasked. The US official or officials who gave his name to the Post broke the law when they leaked classified intelligence. “Unless the Washington Post has somehow miraculously recruited the bartender of a hotel in the Seychelles,” Prince told the House Intelligence Committee in December, “the only way that’s happening is through SIGINT [signals intelligence].”
Prince’s name was unmasked and leaked from classified signals intelligence. Oddly enough, it’s the same modus operandi used in the targeting of President Donald Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. It is a federal felony to publish leaked classified information. Ask WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about that particular unequal application of the law.
The Deep State felons who are strategically leaking this information have politically weaponized our justice system and should be brought up on charges of high treason for their attempts, with malice of forethought, to manufacture the overthrow of a duly- elected President of the United States.
The leaks and publication of classified information alone warrant investigation and prosecution to the fullest extent of the law in this matter, yet Mueller is uninterested in

Screen Shot 2018-07-28 at 10.27.30 PM

those crimes even as they go to the very heart of the credibility of the supposed justification of his investigative mandate.
Yet, as I’ve demonstrated here, the man put in charge of the investigation of this Russia “collusion” case, Robert Mueller, has perfected the art of abuse of the justice system for personal and political gain. He is uninterested in any criminal activity that does not further his cause of damaging this President. If you think that is harsh, consider the criminality of the FISA court abuses by the Obama Department of Justice and FBI.
We have all heard ad nauseum about the infamous “Steele Dossier,” the opposition research document paid for by the Clinton campaign that was used to manufacture the Russia collusion narrative and spark what became the Mueller investigation into our President.
On June 18, 2017, Muller protégé and disgraced former FBI Director James Comey testified in front of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence about the Clinton campaign-funded document, telling Congress that the document was, “salacious and unverified.”
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, created a court called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to allow secret warrants to surveil agents of foreign governments, be they U.S. citizens or non-U.S. actors. In October of 2016, the Obama DOJ/FBI successfully applied for one of these secret warrants to surveil Carter Page, a short-time Trump campaign volunteer. Since these warrants against U.S. citizens are outside of the bounds of the Constitution, they have to be renewed by applying to the court every 90 days after the first warrant application is approved. These secret warrants are so serious they have to be signed off on at the highest levels. The applications in question would have been signed off on by Obama administration FBI and DOJ officials including then FBI Director James Comey. At least one of the renewal applications would have been signed off on by our current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. At the time of signing, they all would have had the knowledge and/or the professional and legal duty to know that the dossier was used as evidence and also had the legal duty to know the evidence origins.
The same would apply to the knowledge of the penalty for submitting unverified information to the FISC for the purpose of obtaining a warrant.
It is a crime to submit under the color of law an application to the FISC that contains unverified information. 50 U.S. Code § 1809 []

Comey’s “salacious and unverified” testimony before the Senate occurred eight months after the Clinton campaign-funded dossier was used in the first successful FISA court application to obtain a surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a Trump campaign volunteer for several months. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence examined the documentation submitted to the court and concluded that the unverified information contained in the Steele dossier was in fact used in the FISC application, without disclosing to the court that it was an opposition research document paid for by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee:
Neither the initial application in October of 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.
The timing of the applications, the inclusion of material the DOJ/FBI knew to be unverified at the time, and the successful result after this fraudulent inclusion speak to the level of criminal corruption of those who sought to destroy Donald Trump’s candidacy and still seek to destroy his subsequent Presidency when their initial efforts failed.
The widespread abuse of the FISA-authorized court, FISC, was laid bare in a court
memorandum of review of these abuses that was declassified in 2017 that went virtually
unnoticed by the media because it didn’t fit their narrative.
These are serious crimes that, left unchecked, lead nations down the path to tyranny at the hands of people who think they know better than we do what is best for us. It’s an age-old struggle America’s Founding Fathers knew well and did everything they could to keep us from experiencing.
The FISC judges themselves have a duty to police their own courts and call to account these bad actors who, by all facts in the documentation I’ve personally seen, have committed a fraud upon the court. If these judges do not have the integrity to self-police in this matter, we in Congress must hold them accountable. using the power granted to us in the Constitution, Congress has created every single federal court in the country except the Supreme Court. We have the duty to phase out, then disband the FISC, while developing a better solution to address the authorization of this sort of surveillance of foreign agents and actors. We have got to clean up the mess that the Obama administration showed is far too easy to create.

If you want answers, and you CAN handle the truth, join me in demanding those answers from “Special Counsel” Robert Mueller, along with his resignation. If he were to resign, it could well be the only truly moral, ethical and decent action Mueller has undertaken in this entire investigation.”

Dr Churchill


Here’s the President’s response:


Is Robert Mueller ever going to release his conflicts of interest with respect to President Trump, including the fact that we had a very nasty & contentious business relationship, I turned him down to head the FBI (one day before appointment as S.C.) & Comey is his close friend..

“There’s no big there there.”

A top FBI agent expressed skepticism about the burgeoning investigation into Trump associates’ ties to Russian electoral meddling, a few months before his texts critical of the president cost him his role in the special counsel’s probe.

Screen Shot 2018-07-29 at 10.00.28 AM

The agent, Peter Strzok, sent a message to a colleague suggesting he was hesitant to join Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s recently formed team because “my gut sense and concern is there’s no big there there.”

For any American who wants an answer sooner, you should read just five words among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged:

“There’s no big there there.”

Former FBI attorney Lisa Page reportedly told a joint committee of the House of Representatives when FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok texted her on May 19, 2017 saying there was “no big there there,” he meant there was no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team and although they hated Trump — they still decided against it, because

“There’s no big there there.”

Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 1.55.04 PM


Much like my Grandfather fraternized with the Russian Bear Joseph Stalin — I also have Russian friends like the Abbot of the Russian monastery in Vashon island whom I’ve met at the Public Market of Vashon and befriended each other, over a cup of tea and later shared some of their own home-brewed healthy “voda” distilled in their own classic kiln.

So now am waiting the Bob Mueller to come calling anytime for Russian collusion, but until then — please stay away from those dodgy Russian nesting babushka dolls that surely contain the seeds of collusion, and state as far away as possible from those pretty Russian girls, because then the FBI investigators will surely nab you.

So stay clear away from the 6 feet plus, long legged Russian blonde babes — lest you get caught in some “Russian collusion.”

Hope, You get my drift, and you stay as far away as possible from the Russian females of the species — so that there will be a far more readily available and growing by the day, supply of Russian beauties for me.

Because as you can see I am a connoisseur of Truth & Beauty and know how to handle Russian blonde tigers, and not just faux pussycats.

So if you are a true Russian beauty — you know where to find me.

And the abbot will supply the vodka.


By the way….

Thank you very much Bob.

And if you have any Russian twins to send my way — I won’t say No.

We’ve got a big monastery in Vashon island and can house many more…

But I can also deal with Japanese twins as well…

Screen Shot 2018-07-29 at 8.54.40 AM

Hope I don’t have to wait for your next investigation of President Donald Trump about the Japanese meddling in our elections, because I’ve already had some “meddling” of my own with the Japanese twins, that after looking back at it — it surely merits some Special Investigation to get to the bottom of it…


Older Posts »


%d bloggers like this: