The inclusion of sociology in secondary education is akin to brainwashing students and turning them into slaves of a totalitarian ideological construct.

And although the voters threw out the brainwashing prior government and assigned all their leaders into the circular file cabinet of history, the political ideas of the previous ruling party are taught to the students of all the public schools, who they give tests to prove the learning of left-wing obsessions, through the new lessons of sociology & all other intersectionality and divisive diversity studies figuring powerfully within the existing curriculum, like Common Core and other unscientific inanities…

Yet, with sociology, the problem lies in the fact that this particular lesson, taught in secondary education, is presented as an acquaintance with a science, while in reality it is nothing more than catechism into the obsessions of the leftist deep state and the Obama/Hillary brigade that is more interested in allowing trannies to enter the little children’s bathrooms than anything else.

Seriously folks — this is their only agenda.

So, if students adopt and internalize these concepts, then their hearts and minds will be polluted and as new people — they will be totally lost to us, and thus we will face a very big problem in the future as a society, because the false prophets of Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and the falsely named “Social justice” are only seeking to overthrow all aspects of gentleness that Western Civilization carries and replace them with barbarity and incivility such as the return to the awful custom of open defecation that we witness everyday onto the streets of San Francisco, Seattle, and Portland, where the homeless and the drug addict populations, simply pull down their pants and poop on the very sidewalks they live on in the parks and downtowns of the major cities of the Western United States that have decided to be called Sanctuary Cities.

And indeed you have to make the connection from the study of Sociology to the Open Defecation on the streets of our downtowns and our parks, because the worst of all leftist obsessions are taught and adored within the sociology lesson, and it is the euphemistically called social justice.

Social justice is the left idea that inequalities between people are the product of some injustice and the government has to eliminate them. According to the lesson of sociology, economic inequalities are due to exploitation, ie injustice. The idea of ​​Marx’s goodwill, which is also taught in sociology, means that when a citizen produces wealth he succeeds in exploiting his fellow man. So enriching someone is done to the detriment of someone else. Naturally, this is not the case, because when one gets rich, he succeeds in delivering either products, or services sought by his fellow human beings and making it work for other fellow human beings. Bill Gates did not become the richest man in the world by stealing other poor people, but by providing the most competitive software in the world, and hiring the most skilled experts in this field with the highest wages on the market. In the help book of sociology for teachers, it is pointed out that poverty is not treated by the individual with his individual effort, but by the state with the redistribution of wealth. Therefore, sociology teachers teach the students of the school that their individual effort will not bring them anything, and in order to cope with their financial difficulties they should rely on the benefits of the First Left Party.

The proven erroneous Marxist idea of ​​surplus value and the toxic concept of class struggle are taught in the sociology lesson and extend beyond individual economic transactions and the global economy. As a person enriches himself by exploiting others, the rich countries have also achieved their growth through the unfair exploitation of third countries which have been poor or poorly exploited. Then, the fact that Third World countries remain very poor is responsible for colonialism from the past and Western capitalism today. It does not say anywhere that the Third World countries that have adopted capitalism since the last decade of the last century belonged to the richest in the world, such as the Asian Tigers of South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Obviously, the authors of sociology write on the left’s notions and not according to reality.

But let us examine what does the left have to do with progress, and we will better understand that they are really an impediment to progress and a strong throw back, and a harkening back, to the days when we did not have any sanitation, nor indoor toilets, and not even outdoor outhouses — but instead people just went out to the fields and defecated like the homeless population does in the Western United States capital cities…

Screen Shot 2019-02-16 at 3.59.44 PM

Sociology refers to the Second World, which consisted of the Communist states. But nowhere is it being considered, because the countries that have practiced Marxist obsessions, such as social justice and class struggle, have failed to produce wealth and have destroyed their societies. Mao’s China is the worst country in human history, where due to the application of the social justice of the Marxist dictator, within three decades they lost between 70 and 120 million people. After Mao’s death, his successor rejected the socialist economy and social justice, adopting capitalism. China, with the opening of its economy, has been transformed from a country that has mainly exported root to an exporter of hi-tech products and today’s GDP is close to that of the US.

Despite the blessed name of social justice, the central goal of the left in the twentieth century is a devastating idea, which should be considered repulsive. High school students would have to learn why social justice is a poisonous substance to society and because it is far more dangerous than racial purity promoted by fascism. Racial purity, as opposed to social justice, from the beginning sounds like a satanic idea that promotes the submission or extermination of other groups of people. The goal of social justice is to help the less successful people, but where it was implemented, it brought tragedies that had nothing to jealous of the Holocaust. Its first application was in the agricultural production of the Soviet Union and led togenocide of Ukrainians , eight years before the Holocaust.

The question that is not found in the schoolbook of sociology is how social justice will come about. Which government will be so capable and virtuous that it will eradicate all inequalities in the most fair way? Some of them with a short pathological liar in front of whom all other politicians are tortured, would be a deputy , but the writers know better that they do not ask such questions. It is good to say that they did not put as a sociological exercise on students to murder Ukrainian families, as did their idols in 1932.

By the way, the authors of school sociology are completely nailed to being leftist ideologists when they write that Russia and China had revolutions in October 1917 and 1949 respectively. The Russian revolution that overturned five centuries of Tsarist authoritarianism occurred in February 1917, while the so-called October Revolution was an Lenin armed coup which overthrew Russia’s first attempt to experiment with representative democracy. The Chinese Revolution, which brought to an end the totalitarian rule that ruled over two thousand years, broke out in 1911. In 1949, the Chinese Stalinists prevailed against the nationalists in their civil war, which broke out in 1946.

The Gulag Archipelago, which was written by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, is to this day the most important Russian book of the 20th century, since it was published in 1972 and inside these two thousand pages the author’s voluminous work has defeated all the ideas of Marxism, and it has also steam rolled over the New Left, as it has also flattened Socialism and the foolish Democratic Socialists, who along with the Neo-Marxist trying to pull the wool cloth over our eyes and bamboozle us with their con-games.

Indeed Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the survivor of the Siberian gulags and the author of this apocalyptic book, “The Gulag Archipelago” that he wrote and hid in strips of used paper from the bathrooms of the gulag — was eager to expose all variants of fascism of the tyrannical Socialist ideology, especially that of the New Left that is now the very central notion of the Democrat party and it’s left-wing obsession.

Apparently the collapse of the ideas of classical Marxism, led the desperate Marxists to the creation of the faculty of social strukturalism or constructivism, or more simply of neo-Marxism masquerading as Democratic Socialism in the West…

This particular Marxist school replaced the bankrupt idea of ​​the bourgeois exploiting the proletariat and the working classes, with the exploitation and oppression of the various racial and sexual minorities by the white patriarchy.

That is, women, homosexuals and people with different skin color, among others, are all victims to varying degrees of patriarchal tyranny. The inconsistent Marxist obsessions of the structuralists have their honor in the sociology of the school and are taught to the students who learn about male dominance in Greek society that “the model of the politician is the middle-class white man of mature age” and that the two sexes are social constructions. In Scandinavian countries, where gender equality is promoted elsewhere in the world,men and women have different professional preferences.

Indeed, it is stressed that the society, ie the white men that prevail in it, is what determines what the sexes have to do, and they report as examples the low female representation of surgeons, pilots and deputies. Of course, some of the most reputable professions are listed in the examples, where there is a low participation from women. If the authors and teachers of the lessons of sociology were sincere in their pursuit of more gender equality, then they would also discuss the even lower representation of female gender in the profession of foresters, miners, tree-cutters, military personnel, builders, carpenters, gardeners, roofers, plumbers, electricians, auto mechanics, and all those other unglamorous professions.

Let the Sociologists explain that particular conundrum away, or why it is not compulsory to include women in the military’s draft rolls after their 18th year of maturity, as men are required to do.

However, the fact that the majority of university students are women, while in prisons neither women nor minorities represent the majority of the total number of prisoners, rather cancels the allegation that white male dominance prevails in the American society today.

And then what about the nonsense that the old Imperialism is somehow akin to today’s terrorism?

The authors of sociology reproduce Lenin’s Marxist novelty about imperialism as a cause of transnational conflicts, that is to say, the economic elite of a country attempting to expand its sphere of economic influence, forces its government to violently collide with its country to exploit its wealthy sources or with another competitive state with similar objectives. In other words, the authors as genuine Greek leftists still live the conflicts of the colonial powers. Unfortunately, Marxist obsession with imperialism does not explain anything in relation to the conflicts currently taking place in Ukraine, the Middle East and Afghanistan, nor does it even touch on the causes of genocide that occurred in the twentieth century in Central and Eastern Europe, in the Western Balkans, East Africa and the Middle East,

In terms of terrorism, sociologists, having informed us that a first response to its causes may arise from consideration of the notices of terrorists themselves, add that sociology seeks “the roots of terrorism in poverty, imperialism, and exploiting the resources of the Third World.”

However, anyone who has been dealing with jihadist and fervent Islamic terrorists for a while — will tell you, that it is a complete waste of time. Because anyone involved in dealing with terrorism, knows that for many years now, al-Qaeda and all others, like ISIS, and the Caliphate, have been publishing all their notices in doublespeak. That is they produce one type of writing in English what is meant for the Western readers, where they said for example that Osama Bin Laden was fighting for the rights of the Palestinians, for the native Afghans against the Soviet Union, and also for the Paris agreement on climate change, etc. All the while the same publications written in Arabic and published by the same Islamic jihad fundamentalists in Arabic, are keen to be seen as preaching to the Sunnis, that they have the religious duty to carry out a sacred war against all the other devoted religions, until they enslave them and thus enforce their own virulent Islamic version of religion upon them.

Who would have imagined that the sociologists were the only ones to take seriously the Arabic Salafists’notices to the West, while forgetting to read the Arabic language version of the self-same. Because if we leave up to the sociologists the search for the roots of terrorism — they will zero into irrelevant things that are mainly social problems such as poverty, imperialism, and exploitation of the Third World from the West, rather than understanding that the virulent hateful philosophy of a desert cult — has morphed into a death cult across the world ever since the introduction of jihad in the 6th century by the goatherd prophet of Arabia.

God rest Mohammed’s soul, but his best apologists today are the Western Sociologists rather than the Muslim mullahs, because their graphic allegations have been abolished countless times since 2001 by those who are academically engaged in counter-terrorism.

The lesson of sociology is nothing more than the conversion of youth on the left. It teaches students all the manifestations of the obsessions of Marxism by the classical one, such as the struggle of classes and the goodwill of labor, imperialism from Leninism and reaching the patriarchal oppression of Neo-Marxism. Yet, apart from the perceptions of three different schools of Marxism, in the curriculum of sociology, the ideas of Ballet and the Khmer Reds for excellence. Students of the Greek language are taught that the titles replace the old titles of nobility and that they are “titles that justify those who already feel sovereign”, whatever that means.

The Socilogists also praise the full legalization of all alien and illegal immigrants, despite their controversial role in causing social unrest, crime, and also failing to protect the few yet real refugees, who need to be protected based on human right abuses in their place of origin. Of course, since the US is a top destination because it supports legal and also free migration within the United States, it is also a magnet for the Sociologists ire…

The inclusion of sociology in secondary education is nothing more than brainwashing in underage students, as their character is in shape and vulnerable to political indoctrination. Sociology is the Socialist’s ultimate effort to sow their ideological seeds of destruction into the heads of the next generations of Americans, now that their time at the switch, has come to an end.


Dr Churchill


Apparently Betsy DeVoss and the rest of the Educational department of the Untied States government has to abolish sociology from the secondary education fully and absolutely. They should have done so from the very first day that they took over the government — but now is the best next chance to do this and this correct a wrong.

Students should prefer and they should ask to be taught the texts of Pliny, John Locke, Cicero, Seneca, Monsieur and Demosthenes, to know why they need to defend our Republic and our Democracy, before we end-up following the example of Russia where, since 2009, “The Gulag Archipelago” by Solzhenitsyn, is taught in all the schools, so that our future citizens are not deceived by left-wing populists and Socialist demagogues, who use easily lovable and catchy slogans in order to defeat logic and the hard realties of Life and History.

Equally important, students would be to get the young students better acquainted with the philosophical ideas of the Scottish Enlightenment, in order to discover that individual freedom has brought about the unthinkable economic, technological, and innovation progress, that humanity has enjoyed in the past three centuries — instead of being the victims of the Socialists, the New left, and of the Neo-Marxists, who are now trying to divide society in outraged minorities full of imagined casualties and perceived sacrifices, and playing the blame game of fake victims, railing against the western culture for whatever is crooked in their personal lives, for their evil addictions, for their surrendering into the many broken pleasures of the flesh, and also for whatever else might be happening in the wider world — including the changeable weather.

Screen Shot 2019-02-14 at 1.04.52 AM

Ever wondered why the development of the thorium cycle energy reactors has been so slow?

Terribly slow as a matter of fact, and a complete shame that the Thorium technology was never developed further back when nuclear energy mattered — because it might have been mature enough today.

Now the promise of “Thorium 2050” seems very far away, and creepily similar to the promise for the development of fission energy cycle.

Of course, I am not sure about the cost analysis of LFTR, comparing it to other nuclear reactors, or the price of energy in general, because it could replace fossil fuel-powered plants, so the incentive considering its zero carbon footprint, at least while running, should be large, and thus worthy of subsidies like those offered for solar and wind energy.

Indeed it appears, that humanity may face an energy crisis as the world’s population rapidly grows, and although Nuclear power plants can generate bountiful, carbon-free electricity — their solid fuel is problematic, there is no available long term nuclear spent fuel storage facility, and therefore all the aging nuclear reactors are being shut down without replacements on the pipeline…

Yet, we all know that even a Cold War era, liquid-fueled reactor design could transform thorium — an easily found and plentiful radioactive waste produced from mining — into a practically limitless energy source. And indeed, US engineers proved such a system works well, during the 1960s. However, the military canceled the project and thus Thorium nuclear energy production was nearly forgotten.

Screen Shot 2019-03-29 at 6.07.22 PM

Yet, today, companies and governments are now trying to revive and evolve the design, although development costs, engineering challenges, and nuclear-weapons concerns all pose hurdles — because the lifeblood of modern civilization is affordable, & free-flowing energy.

Energy gives us the power to cook our food, heat our homes, and make a cup of tea. It also helps us to grow and refrigerate our food, to purify water, to manufacture products, to provide healthcare, from performing surgeries and organ transplants, to manufacturing the drugs we all use daily, and also to allow the transportation to get us to the Doctor’s office or to school and to the workplace, or even to drive a car in order to simply go to recreate out in the countryside, and perhaps to go fishing, and to totally procrastinate from work…

Today’s cheap, bountiful supplies of energy, make it hard to see humanity’s looming energy crisis, but it’s possibly coming within our lifetimes, because our numbers will grow from 7.36 billion people today to 9 billion in 2040, which represents an average increase of 22%. Rapidly developing nations, however, will supercharge global energy consumption at more than twice that rate.

Fossil fuels could quench the planet’s deep thirst for energy, but they’d be a temporary fix at best. Known reserves may dry up within a century or two. And burning up that carbon-based fuel would accelerate climate change, which is already on track to disrupt and jeopardize countless lives.

Meanwhile, renewable energy sources like wind and solar, though key parts of a solution, are not silver bullets— especially if the world is to meet a 2050 deadline set by the Paris Agreement. Energy from fusion is promising, but it’s not yet proved to work, let alone on a commercial and competitive scale.

Nuclear reactors, on the other hand, could fit the bill, because they’re dense, they are reliable, they emit no carbon, and contrary to bitter popular sentiment, they are among the safest energy sources on earth, since even today, they supply about 20% of America’s energy. Though by the 2040s, this share may drop to 10% as companies shut down decades-old reactors, according to a July 2016 report released by Idaho National Laboratory (INL).

The good news is that a proven solution is at hand — if we want it badly enough.

It’s called a molten-salt reactor, the technology was conceived during the Cold War and forgoes solid nuclear fuel for a liquid one, which it can “burn” with far greater efficiency than any power technology in existence. It also generates a small fraction of the radioactive waste compared to today’s commercial reactors, which all rely on solid fuel. And, in theory, molten-salt reactors can never melt down.

According to Kirk Sorensen, the chief technology officer of nuclear-energy startup Flibe Energy: “Thorium, is reliable, it’s clean, it basically does everything fossil fuel does today, and it does a whole bunch of things it doesn’t do today, like make energy without emitting carbon, though the same could be said of any nuclear reactor. What’s more, feeding a molten-salt reactor a radioactive waste from mining, called thorium which is three to four times more abundant than uranium, can “breed” as much nuclear fuel as it burns up.

Manhattan Project scientist Alvin Weinberg calculated in 1959 that if we could somehow harvest all the thorium in the Earth’s crust and use it in this way, we could power civilization for tens of billions of years.

The technology is viable, the science has been demonstrated. Demonstrated, because government scientists built two complementary prototypes during the 1950s and ’60s. They weren’t good for making nuclear weapons, though, and this among other reasons, caused the government bureaucrats to pull the funding for the revolutionary energy technology. Indeed, the last working molten-salt energy reactor shut down in 1969.

Today, entrepreneurs such as Sorensen are working tirelessly to revive and modernize the technology. So are foreign governments, including France, India, and China, who now spends more than $350 million a year developing its variation of the Cold War-era Thorium reactor design.

The story of how we got here is neither short nor simple, but it explains why Sorensen and others are betting big on humanity’s coming “Thorium Age” — and why the US continues to stumble at its dawn.

The argument for going away from nuclear energy, are nuclear accidents like the three mile island nuclear power plant radioactive steam loss in Pennsylvania’s Middletown. With its brutalist architecture Nuclear plants may not be sexy, but nuclear energy unlocks a truly incredible source of carbon-free fuel. Ounce per ounce, uranium provides roughly 16,000 times more energy than coal and creates millions of times less pollution.

The argument to support growth in nuclear energy is so clear to James Hansen, a retired NASA earth scientist, a seasoned climatologist, and an outspoken environmentalist — that he passionately advocates for the use and development of the technology.

“To solve the climate problem, policy must be based on facts and not on prejudice. The climate system cares about greenhouse gas emissions — not about whether energy comes from renewable power or abundant nuclear power,” Hansen and three other well-known scientists — Ken Caldeira, Kerry Emanuel, and Tom Wigley — together wrote in an editorial for The Guardian in 2015.

The three climate scientists wrote: “Nuclear energy can power whole civilizations, and produce waste streams that are trivial compared to the waste produced by fossil fuel combustion. Nuclear will make the difference between the world missing crucial climate targets or achieving them.”

Climate science aside, the economics of nuclear energy are enough of a draw to make the technology worthwhile.

Today, the industry is already profitable, albeit heavily subsidized. Still, if you level the energy playing field against other power sources by taking into account government subsidies and tax breaks, capital costs, fuel costs, and other factors that affect the price-per-megawatt-hour of a power plant, nuclear energy remains a financial win in the long run.

Nuclear power’s 2016 levelized costs make it about twice as cheap as natural gas “peaking” plants (which fire up to meet sudden peaks in energy demand). Nuclear also beats the overall cost of many coal-fired power plants. And that’s before you account for the extraordinary hidden costs of fossil fuels against public health and the environment, including particulate pollution, which kills tens of thousands of people a year, and exacerbating climate change.

Nuclear also wins financially against solar rooftops, many fuel-cell energy schemes, and some geothermal and bioenergy plants.

That isn’t to say that current nuclear power plants are flawless. However, they’re irrefutably amazing power sources, currently meeting one-fifth of the US’s energy needs with just 61 power plants. They’re also incredibly reliable, always-on sources of baseload electricity, heat, and medically useful radioisotopes.

Yet great titans fall hard, and the reasons why, are key to the continued delay of the arrival of the Thorium Age.

The why nuclear energy is collapsing in America, is because new reactors that are planned or are supposed to be coming online soon, have all stalled and the industry has stagnated, with eight of the US’s 99 decades-old reactors planned for shutdown by 2025.


Flibe Energy’s Sorensen partly blames aggressive government subsidies of wind and solar energy, which leads to the problem of negative pricing.

“We’ve created rules that disturb the energy market substantially,” Sorensen said. “The first rule is that whenever wind and solar come online, we have to take the power. That’s called grid priority. The second rules is, they’re paid no matter how much power they make.”

Sorensen characterized this as the “murder” of nuclear energy, since those plants can’t be shut on and off quickly. He also said this is hurting the environment by causing companies to invest more heavily in gas plants which can be ramped up and down far more quickly.

“These two put together create negative prices, and if you’re a nuclear power-plant operator, and you’re trying to obviously make money selling power to the grid and the prices go negative for large portions of the day, that’s economically unviable. And that’s what’s causing reactors to get shut down.”

But other issues are kneecapping nuclear too, such as time and costs, because this is the trojan horse of nuclear power plant construction. The decommissioning process can take decades.

Energy sources such as hydroelectric and wind are still cheaper than nuclear, and a fracking boom has fueled investment in natural-gas-fired power plants.

As a result, nuclear is having a harder time finding a seat at the energy-pricing table.

Reactors also take many years and billions of dollars to permit, build, and license for operation: They’re exceedingly large and complex works of engineering, although you only need a high school diploma to operate them once they’re finished, as the cartoon Southpark has proven (sic).

Today in 2019, the average US reactor is about 35 years old. They can run for decades with constant maintenance. The Oyster Creek nuclear generating station outside of New York City, for example, has operated since 1969. But many nuclear reactors are being eyed for shutdown, and once they’re shut off, reactors can take more than a decade to decommission, demolish, and bury.

A dysfunctional uranium fuel cycle in the US has not helped, where just 3% to 6.5% of solid uranium fuel is burned up — and the remaining 93% to 97% is treated as radioactive waste and not reprocessed and recycled.

Fear of Nuclear melt downs and accidental releases such as the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster are what fuels the society’s pervasive anxiety toward nuclear power, that is often amped to irrational levels.

While events such as Windscales, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and the Fukushima Daiichi disaster stand out in people’s minds, the reality does not match up by a long shot.

Screen Shot 2019-03-29 at 6.08.31 PM

“Nuclear radiation ticks all the boxes for increasing the fear factor,” David Spiegelhalter, a statistician at Cambridge University, told New Scientist after the Fukushima disaster in 2011: “It is invisible, an unknowable quantity. People don’t feel in control of it, and they don’t understand it. They feel it is imposed upon them and that it is unnatural. It has the dread quality of causing cancer and birth defects.”

But as Spiegelhalter, Sorensen, and others have said, the actual safety record of nuclear power is remarkable: “Fukushima’s reactor meltdowns killed no one, according to a 2013 World Health Organization report. Even in the two most affected locations of Fukushima prefecture, people in the first year would receive only two to three CT chest scans worth of radiation exposure. Let me throw out other names you might not be familiar with: San Bruno & Banqiao Dam, referring to the two accidents that killed eight people in a 2010 California gas-line explosion, and as many as 230,000 people, in a series of 1975 Chinese dam collapses, respectively. These are catastrophic incidents with hydropower and natural gas that really did result in large losses of human life, and yet the public doesn’t have a terror of hydroelectric power or natural gas.”

What does the data say about nuclear energy’s safety?

Measuring immediate deaths against gigawatts of electrical power is a typical way to assess the safety of energy sources, and a 2010 analysis by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) used this.

But adding in incidental deaths that occur later, such as 9,000 estimated cancer fatalities from Chernobyl (which the OECD left out), does change the numbers, as does including pollution deaths and incidental Banqiao Dam deaths.

In a more apples-to-apples comparison, New Scientist crunched the numbers. That maximum death-toll estimates from that analysis show: Natural gas is 1.3 times as dangerous as nuclear. Coal is 27 times as dangerous as nuclear. Hydroelectric is 46 times as dangerous as nuclear. In absolute terms, nuclear energy prevents about 80,000 air-pollution-related deaths a year, according to a 2013 study. Groups with antinuclear positions, such as Greenpeace, have struggled to spin these numbers.

“Nuclear power has consistently been proven to be the safest and most effective form of power that we have today, and by using thorium nuclear power, we can take that admirable safety record and go even further,” Sorensen said.

But grasping the promise and potential perils of a thorium-powered future, or any other atomic-energy scheme, means you’ve got to know a thing or two about nuclear physics.

Nuclear Physics 101: Advanced test reactor cherenkov and the idaho national laboratory show the blue glow of INL’s Advanced Test Reactor core, caused by Cherenkov radiation — an emission caused when particles move faster than light through a substance (in this case, electrons through water).

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.32.03 AM

In the United States, about 100,000 people work in the nuclear industry, and yet each year only a few thousand are awarded an undergraduate degree in physics.

These numbers suggest that more than 99% of us aren’t intimately familiar with how nuclear energy works — so here’s a bit of background about the atomic magic that provides roughly one-fifth of US power.

What reactors do? A commercial nuclear reactor’s job, like any fossil-fuel-burning plant, is to generate heat. Systems around the reactor harvest that flow of energy, use it to boil water into steam, drive turbines, and ultimately create electricity. Instead of burning fossil fuels, though, nuclear reactors “burn” heavy elements, typically uranium.

But uranium isn’t just uranium. The element is found as, and can be transformed into, different isotopes, or various weights or “flavors” of the same atomic element:
uranium-238 (U-238), which makes up 99.27% of natural uranium ore
uranium-235 (U-235), which is just 0.72% of natural ore, but a key ingredient in weapons and reactor fuel
uranium-233 (U-233), which isn’t found in nature yet is essential to thorium molten-salt reactors (more on this later)
The larger the number, the more chargeless neutrons are jammed into an atomic nucleus, and the heavier it is. Take away or add a neutron, and you can radically alter an isotope’s stability (and radioactivity), the types of radiation it emits, and what happens when it’s blasted by more neutrons.

The most common isotopes of uranium aren’t very radioactive.

For half of any U-238 to decay into lighter atoms — a measure called half-life — it takes 4.6 billion years. That’s a very, very long time to spread out a set amount of radiation. U-235 isn’t much more radioactive with a half-life of 704 million years.

Compare that to radon-222 (Rn-222), a gas with a half-life of nearly four days. It’s tens of billion times as radioactive as U-235, ounce for ounce, simply because Rn-222 decays so much faster. (Which is why it’s a problem if it seeps out of the ground and into your basement.)

Yet we don’t use Rn-222 as a nuclear fuel. One atomic property matters much more than all the others inside a reactor core.

Going critical: One of the most important things about a nuclear fuel is the chance its nucleus will react with a flying neutron, a property called neutron cross section.

Physicists measure cross section as an area, in “barns,” which you can imagine as a baseball glove. The larger the cross section the bigger the glove, and the more likely it is to catch a neutron — the baseball in this analogy.

The speed of a neutron greatly affects what happens next, and it can get weird.

A neutron can scatter, get captured, and turn a nucleus into a new isotope, or, and this is of tremendous importance — get caught in the glove, suddenly fission it into pieces, and spit out two or three more baseballs in the process.

When those extra neutrons slam into nearby isotopes and cause them to fission, too, it’s a chain reaction.

Energy vs. bombs: Fission chain reactions are the key to nuclear reactors (and nuclear bombs), since each fission event turns a little bit of mass into pure energy.

However, only a handful of isotopes are fissile — meaning they spit out enough neutrons and have the right cross section to “go critical” in a chain reaction.

U-238’s thermal cross section is about 0.00003 barn. That is a very tiny glove. Meanwhile, U-235’s cross section is 583 barns, making its figurative “glove” millions of times as big, and a highly fissile fuel. U-233 is also fissile with a respectable cross section of 529 barns.

This is all gravely important, because a controlled chain reaction is a nuclear reactor. A runaway fission reaction is a nuclear disaster, or a weapon of mass destruction.

It took thousands of the world’s brightest scientists in the Manhattan Project many years to crack open these and deeper mysteries of nuclear physics, then design technologies like bombs and reactors, so we’ll skip most of that backstory. “The Making of the Atomic Bomb” by Richard Rhodes is one of the best books to explore that history.

But in addition to figuring out how to “breed” Pu-239 from U-238, scientists learned to transmute thorium into U-233.

Breeding atoms, is as real as alchemy gets.

Thorium: Crystals of thorium nitrate do the job, and if you press Kirk Sorensen for a simple analogy that illustrates how energy from thorium works, he may plunk you down in a wet forest: “If you’ve ever gone camping as a Boy Scout or something like that, and been caught in a rainstorm and had to start a fire, you know that you’re really looking hard for dry wood. Wood that will immediately burn. That’s kind of how some of the uranium we have today is,” Sorensen said. “It’s like the dry wood. It’s the kindling.”

Which makes thorium the wet wood, so if you can get your nuclear fire hot enough — it will burn Thorium too: “That’s an imperfect analogy, but what happens in a thorium reactor is thorium absorbs neutrons and it forms a new fuel — uranium-233 — that can then sustain the reaction, because it can produce enough neutrons to continue turning more thorium into U-233.”

This transformative process is called breeding, and it’s the key that unlocks the promise of thorium — and explains its eventual abandonment during the Cold War.

Manhattan Project scientists, who embraced a “try everything” race to the bomb, didn’t figure out thorium breeding until late in World War II.

They initially focused on enriching U-235 in natural ore from less than 1% to about 90%, which is considered weapons-grade material.

The mile-long K-25 Building in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, where bomb-grade uranium was enriched for World War, is where this happened, but enrichment proved that it was painfully inefficient, requiring city-size industrial complexes with mile-long buildings, and it all was used up for war bomb production. As a matter of fact, all $1 billion worth of enriched uranium went inside the “Little Boy” bomb, which killed more than 100,000 people in Hiroshima.

Plutonium, an element not found in nature — and specifically the isotope Pu-239 — eventually changed everything, since it was a simpler, although still arduous path to the development of nuclear weapons.

The highly fissile isotope could be “bred” from common U-238 by pounding it with neutrons, then chemically removing the fresh Pu-239 with a bath of nitric acid— no mile-long buildings full of machinery required.

But in tandem, the Manhattan Project also explored making a third fissile material, U-233, from thorium.

Bellow is a photo of some crystals of Thorium nitrate…

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.32.40 AM

Thorium’s first fizzle: Operation teapot met with a nuclear burst. A nuclear blast from Operation Teapot in 1955 at the Nevada test site was a magnificent site to behold. Glenn Seaborg, who discovered plutonium in 1940, “may have seen uranium-233 as a backup plan to the plutonium effort,” Sorensen wrote in his 2014 University of Tennessee master’s thesis about early research into thorium.

The scheme involved fueling up a reactor, then using the neutrons to bombard thorium — and breeding it into U-233. But U-233 quickly became a dead end for the military. For one, U-235 and Pu-239 were precious bomb-making materials, so burning them up in reactors was risky. Breeding U-233 from thorium also created significant amounts of a worrisome contaminant called U-232, which scientists had not yet figured out how to remove.

U-232 emits a lot of alpha radiation, which can trigger spontaneous fission — not good for a nuclear weapon you don’t want to randomly explode. Its decay products also emit a lot of gamma radiation, which can wreck electronics and harm or kill people who handle bombs. In addition, gamma rays can blow a bomb’s cover, since they are detectable by airplane or satellite, and pass through all but the heaviest radiation shielding.

Plutonium 239 metal: A ring of 99.96% pure plutonium metal from the Los Alamos National Laboratory, where scientists like Seaborg weren’t even certain a U-233-powered bomb would blow up very well. Apparently, they were right: We know that a 1955 “Operation Teapot” weapons test using U-233 fizzled, although the US government has yet to declassify all the details.

So in 1945, with Pu-239 production firmly in place, confidence in that weapons material, and a looming Japanese surrender, the defenders of breeding thorium into U-233 went to zero.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 1.29.22 AM

Was that the right decision?

It’s very hard to know.

Those people thought that they were making a decision to preserve the future for their children, so I hesitate to levy judgments on those decisions made in the past.

But in the years leading up to the war’s end, Manhattan Project scientists were dreaming up ways to turn their wartime research into commercial power sources, and one group arrived at a brilliant concept: a super-fuel-efficient “breeder” reactor that ran on thorium and U-233.

A powerful postwar revival for thorium, was when molten salt reactor experiment succeeded, and on a see-through scale model of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment, the concept of the breeder reactor was achieved in a fairly straightforward manner.

It would dramatically increase the chances for fission, boost the flow of neutrons, and breed more fissile fuel from a “fertile” material than the reactor burned up. Breeding U-238 into Pu-239 created an excess of plutonium. Meanwhile, breeding thorium into U-233 broke even, burning up just as much fuel as it made.

The choice of fuel makes all the difference, because the plutonium fuel cycle is a great way to make weapons. Meanwhile, the thorium fuel cycle can produce almost limitless energy.

A fluid-fueled design was ultimately envisioned by Manhattan Project scientists to “eliminate the considerable difficulty of fabricating solid fueled elements,” Sorensen wrote in his thesis. Liquid fuel also made it easy to remove both useful fission products — for example, for medical procedures, and those that poison nuclear chain reactions. The gas xenon-135 (Xe-135) is a common uranium fission product, and its 3-million-barn cross section gobbles up neutrons and chokes reactors.

Physicist Alvin Weinberg later wrote the idea to use fluid fuels “kind of an obsession” of his, to the extent he eventually succeeded at building his first molten-salt reactors in Tennessee.

When the Air Force launched an effort to build a nuclear-powered bomber in 1947 — part of the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program— Weinberg, who in 1945 invented the now industry standard light-water reactor (LWR), rose to the occasion, and created the NB-36H, a jet bomber that flew with the energy produced from a portable nuclear reactor from 1955 through 1957 when the USAF killed the project as too risky for it falling into enemy hands, and also because Weinberg, then the director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), thought LWRs were too heavy and inefficient for a jet airplane.

In fact, even modern LWRs — which all US commercial nuclear power plants operate today — fission or “burn up” just a few percent of their fuel before it needs to be replaced. That’s because neutron-absorbing waste builds up in the fuel, can’t be removed, and chokes fission.

“When you go to gas station, do you feel good about burning 10% of it? What about 5%?” Sorensen said, referencing the low burn-up rate of solid-fueled commercial reactors. “You want to burn it all. Why should we expect anything different?”

A molten-salt reactor emerged as the clear choice, since it could be built small: The fluid dramatically increases the efficiency of nuclear fission by making it easy to remove fission products, helping it burn up almost all the nuclear fuel and boosting energy output.

A first molten salt reactor aircraft reactor experiment was still valid, and a cutaway diagram of the first molten-salt reactor, called the Aircraft Reactor Experiment (ARE) is a sight to behold. By 1954, Weinberg’s team had built the proof-of-concept Aircraft Reactor Experiment (ARE), a 2.5-megawatt power plant that ran on a small amount of uranium-235 dissolved in molten salt made of fluorine, sodium, and zirconium.

It was the first working molten-salt reactor ever built.

Dissolved inside the reactor’s molten salt, U-235 fuel powered a fission chain reaction. The atomic heat warmed up an adjacent loop of coolant (filled with molten sodium) by 300 degrees, from 1,200 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Incoming air cooled the sodium, and pumps returned it to the fluid-fueled reactor core for reheating.

“The Air Force was delighted by the aircraft reactor experiment,” Weinberg wrote in his 1994 autobiography, “The First Nuclear Era,” since this was hot enough to drive jet-engine turbines.

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.33.11 AM

Weinberg’s new technology never made it inside the “The Crusader” nuclear B-36 bomber, which actually did fly carrying a working reactor, before President John F. Kennedy canceled the entire USAF project in 1961.

However, Weinberg had squeezed years’ worth of research on molten-salt reactors out of the effort by then — and wasted no time spinning his work into the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE).

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.34.21 AM

Thus Weinberg’s thorium dream was born: A top-down view of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment taken in 1964 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory where Weinberg and his colleagues designed MSRE over five years as a prototype for a commercial power plant shows us how it was done.

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.34.01 AM

It contained a loop filled with a molten salt made of fluorine, lithium, and beryllium — or FLiBe, the namesake of Sorensen’s energy-from-thorium startup— plus zirconium. The salt carried around dissolved U-235 and eventually U-233, making MSRE the world’s first reactor to run on U-233 fuel. A second loop of molten salt cooled the reactor.

The reactor went critical in 1965, ran for thousands of hours with only minor issues, and was put into standby mode after its first run ended in 1969. Weinberg thought of MSRE as a proof-of-concept, and he planned to develop it into a full molten salt breeder reactor (MSBR).

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.33.48 AM

This new version would blanket the neutron-shooting core with thorium, gradually transforming the element into U-233. Systems would filter out the new fuel as it’s created and feed it back into the core — all without having to shut down the reactor.

He also envisioned a world flush with thorium molten-salt breeder reactors as cheap, clean energy sources not only for the US but also for the developing world. According to “SuperFuel,” a 2013 book on thorium energy’s demise and promise by journalist and author Richard Martin, Weinberg envisioned nuclear oases in the desert: “Fed by the dream of inexhaustible, inexpensive energy, Weinberg’s projections became grandiose. The Oak Ridge scientists studied the ‘construction of giant agro-industrial complexes built around nuclear reactors . . . A complex built around thorium breeders could sustain 100,000 farmers and laborers, feed five million others and export fertilizers to grow food for 50 million additional people.”

But it was not to be, because some thought and followed the “It hasn’t been done before, so we shouldn’t try it at all” theory. Martin argues that a stubborn naval engineer named Milton Shaw derailed Weinberg’s Thorium Age indefinitely. Shaw led the Atomic Energy Commission’s research wing during Weinberg’s tenure at ORNL and, in 1972, issued a rambling report that terminated Weinberg’s project. Shaw had seen the early success of the liquid-metal fast-breeder reactor, another new type of nuclear power plant, and diverted MSRE’s funding to such a project on the Clinch River in Tennessee: a plutonium-fueled design that cost taxpayers $8 billion but never actually built a reactor.

In “SuperFuel,” Martin exposes Shaw’s rickety argument for killing the MSRE, a point that forms his book’s central argument: “It was the first of many versions of what would become a familiar argument: It hasn’t been done before, and doing it would be challenging. So we shouldn’t try it at all.”

Martin then argues similar thinking has stuck with the US government ever since Shaw’s letter: “Shaw’s reasoning was perfectly circular: Private industry will not invest in the MSBR as a commercial venture without the support of the government. We, the government, won’t support it. Thus private industry won’t invest in it.”

Weinberg was quickly pushed out of ORNL and into retirement. His molten-salt reactors never demonstrated the full thorium fuel cycle — breeding thorium into U-233 — but another project did.

Situated in western Pennsylvania and spearheaded by Shaw’s boss, Navy Admiral Hyman Rickover, the Shippingport Atomic Power Station pulled off the feat, yet inside a solid-fueled LWR, which is the one that helped pioneer the development of the first nuclear-powered submarine.

Martin succinctly describes Shippingport’s success in his book: “The Shippingport Atomic Power Station first went critical in December 1957 and produced energy for the Duquesne Light Company for 25 years. It occupies a unique position in the history of nuclear power. It was considered the first full-scale nuclear power reactor with no military use: all it did was produce energy. […] Shippingport proved that you could use thorium as an inexpensive and safe nuclear fuel in a light-water reactor and that you could breed additional fuel with it. This was not alchemy, but it was close.”

Sorensen and other entrepreneurs would discover this history decades later and attempt to revive Weinberg’s dream.

Rekindling the thorium dream: Kirk Sorensen, the president and chief technologist of Flibe Energy. Sorensen first learned of molten-salt reactors in 2000, when he was an engineer at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. His task at the time was to figure out how to power human bases on other worlds.

As Martin describes the moment in his 2009 feature for Wired, Sorensen saw a 1958 book called “Fluid Fuel Reactors” on the shelf of a colleague. The book laid out the lessons of Weinberg’s molten-salt reactor experiments for use in aircraft, yet also teased his vision of a thorium-powered future.
He ultimately left NASA to join a nuclear-energy company, later striking out on his own with Flibe Energy.

“For the longest time I thought that good ideas always got developed,” Sorensen said. “I’ve learned that the opposite is actually true. Most of the time, good ideas languish. And only through dedicated and committed effort are you able to see a new technology brought to fruition.”

In the next decade or so, several safer, more efficient next-generation reactor technologies may hit the market. Sorensen puts them into two groups: molten-salt reactors that don’t use thorium or solid-fueled technologies that could, but are comparatively minor and therefore easier-to-license, upgrades to the LWR design.

Sorensen is a proponent of a third group and the one he’s staking his career on, the liquid-fluoride thorium reactor, or LFTR (an acronym pronounced “lifter”), liquid fluoride thorium molten salt reactor design lftr concept 250mwe flibe energy, where Flibe Energy’s concept for a liquid-fluoride thorium reactor, or LFTR.Courtesy Flibe Energy resembles the LFTR in Sorensen’s own spin on Weinberg’s thorium breeder reactor work from the 1960s.

A 2015 independent review of the LFTR concept by the Electric Power Research Institute deemed it a “potentially transformational technology for meeting future energy needs in the face of uncertain market, policy, and regulatory constraints.”

Here’s part of the laundry list of reasons why Sorensen and others say that’s the case: Fuel burn-up is extraordinarily high. LFTRs could fission about 99% of their U-233 liquid fuel, compared to a few percent for solid fuel.
It’s easy to clean up. Solid fuels build up fission products, or new elements generated by the splitting of atoms, which poison fission reactions and often end up being treated as waste. Liquid fuels, meanwhile, can be processed “online” — and the fission products continuously removed, refined, and sold.
There’s less waste and it’s shorter-lived. For the above reasons, hundreds of times less radioactive waste is left over from LFTR operation compared to LWRs. And what remains requires burial for about 300 years, as opposed to 10,000 years for solid-fuel waste.
LFTRs operate under normal pressure. All commercial reactors compress water coolant to extreme pressures — upwards of 150 times that found at Earth’s surface. One small breach can lead to a catastrophic explosion. If a LFTR pipe breaks, however, molten salt will only spill on the ground and freeze.
Environmental contamination is far less likely. LWRs can release gases, fuel, and fission products into the air and water. Molten salt freezes and traps most contaminants.
LFTRs can be made small and modular. LWRs require giant, reinforced-concrete containment vessels that scale with their operating pressure. LFTRs require small containment structures, so they could be made small — possibly to a size that’d fit inside a semi-trailer.
They should be much cheaper and faster to build. LFTRs don’t require many of the expensive safeguards that LWRs do. Their potential to be modular could also lead to mass manufacture of parts and reduced cost.
LFTR is immune to meltdowns. Molten salt that overheats will expand, pushing fissile atoms away from one another and slowing down a chain reaction.
The design is “walk-away safe.” No nuclear power plant today can claim this. LWRs require backup power systems to cool solid fuel at all times. If power is knocked out to a LFTR, a freeze plug melts and lets the molten salt fall into underground containment units, where it freezes and stops fission.
Electricity output is better. LFTRs are so hot, operating at roughly 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit, they can use more advanced heat-to-electricity conversion technologies.
The excess heat is very useful. It could boil and desalinate ocean water into drinking water, help generate hydrogen for fuel cells, break down organic waste into biofuels, and power industrial processes.
The “kindling” to start a LFTR is flexible. Burning up old nuclear weapons material is possible, since fissile U-233, U-235, or Pu-239 can be used to start the reactor.
And the list goes on and on and on…

With these and other benefits, it’s easy to get excited about LFTRs, other molten-salt reactors, and even thorium-fueled LWRs.

But it all raises the question: If thorium reactors are so great, what’s the holdup?

Screen Shot 2019-03-30 at 2.32.03 AM

Cherenkov radiation (blue) emanates from spent fuel being removed from the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, where thorium reaction questions basically boil down to this: “The science is easy. The engineering is hard.”

That’s the verdict from Gougar and his colleague at INL, nuclear engineer Dave Petti.

“This is true in many, many advanced systems, nuclear and nonnuclear for that matter, where the scientists’ proof of concept is everything to them,” Petti told Business Insider. “To the engineer, getting it to the commercial-viability stage is their goal. And those are two very different hills to climb. ”

Petti and Gougar see three barriers to powering civilization with commercial thorium LFTRs.

1. Molten salt is a health hazard. LFTR’s molten salt contains beryllium to help regulate nuclear fission, but it’s a big health hazard. If there’s ever a leak or spill of the material, Petti says it solidifies into a crumbly “snow” that workers might inhale, raising their risk of a lung cancer and a disease called berylliosis.

Molten salt also contains lithium, which a reactor can breed into a radioactive gas called tritium. It’s less of a threat than beryllium, but it can bond to water and make it slightly radioactive, possibly leading to cancer and birth defects.

Luckily, such tainted water doesn’t stick around in the body, which flushes out half of any amount within 10 days, according to a Savannah River Site fact sheet. It’s also quickly and dramatically diluted if and when it evaporates or reaches any large body of water.

Dave Swank, a retired nuclear engineer who worked with commercial reactors for more than 35 years, emailed Business Insider to point out other hazards of molten salts: “Salts can be very harmful to metal piping (think of salt used on the road and what it does to car bodies),” Swank wrote. “Another challenge is the use of [fluorine] which is highly toxic due to its strong ability to strip electrons.”

Gougar also backed up this point, noting that developers like Sorensen “will have a difficult time demonstrating that their already-melted cores can remain safely contained” — as in, “no leaks in the pipes or valves or other irritating but common challenges that confront power plant systems,” he wrote…

As previously noted, however, he added that a molten-salt reactor’s “system pressure is very low so when a leak does occur, the radioactive goo isn’t sprayed all over the place.”

But good engineering, proper safety protocols, and protective equipment for LFTR staff would minimize these and other risks.

2. Engineering new reactors takes a long time and costs billions of dollars
The second barrier is the most exhausting but, Petti says, not insurmountable — especially if you have billionaires supporting you in the early stage investment to get the Thorium StartUp up and running, because you have to demonstrate the technology works, scale it up, and make sure it’s reliable for the commercial product and it takes a lot of time and a lot of money to get the technology from a proof of concept all the way to a commercial endeavor.

3. LFTRs create weapons-grade material (but it’s complicated) as Petti said that the LFTR’s biggest bugaboo, is its nuclear proliferation risk, since U-233 fuel could be used to make a bomb.

Fortunately, built-in contamination — by highly radioactive U-232, as previously noted — is a good deterrent, since the isotope quickly decays into thorium-228, which shoots out deadly (and easy-to-detect) gamma radiation.

Still, there is a way to greatly reduce this danger and enable production of safe-to-handle, weapons-grade U-233: an intermediate step between thorium and U-233, called protactinium-233 (Pa-233). This makes it possible to filter out Pa-233 and, months later, get a relatively pure and minimally contaminated lump of U-233 with minimal U-232 (and gamma-ray) contamination.

“When we talk to the nonproliferation experts, the safeguard issues are huge,” Petti said. “Being able to prove that you can’t do something nefarious has a big impact on the design.”

Gougar added: “It’s not that NSA doesn’t trust Kirk Sorensen. It’s Iran or North Korea that cannot be trusted with Thorium cycle reactors producing weapons grade fissionable materials.

That’s not to say using a LFTR to make nuclear weapons would be simple.

First, it may take a large and easily visible industrial-scale process to cleanse enough stolen U-233 to make a bomb, which minimizes the threat of terrorism. Also, at least as envisioned by Sorensen, the LFTR concept is a closed-loop system — so getting access to the liquid fuel and siphoning off materials would be exceedingly difficult.

North Korea nuclear weapons could be the kind that fits inside a KN-08 missile on a TEL as those shown on a military parade in Pyongyang in 2012. North Korea is today’s massive threat. Then again, for a nation like North Korea, stealing material from a US reactor is not the concern. Rather, it’s a theft of the blueprints for one, then adapting that design to operate as a powerful new source of weapons-grade nuclear material. That security concern may also be a moot point, however, since both China and India are already working on developing the technology, and aggressively so.

Given that scenario, it might be better to create and license LFTRs in a highly regulated environment, like the US, so that nonproliferation safeguards are built into the design long before it’s exported, or stolen, and adopted.

LFTR advocates also point out that many nations can already create and refine fissile U-235 and Pu-239 with traditional LWRs.

There’s still a long road to the Thorium Age though, because addressing all of the niggling details, according to current government estimates, might take until 2050 to fully realize a commercial LFTR or other type of thorium molten-salt breeder reactor.

Similarly arduous timescales are true of other “generation four” nuclear reactors, which is why they, too, aren’t yet powering US homes and businesses.

“Maneuvering the licensing process is a huge challenge. The regulatory framework is not currently streamlined to support these novel innovative technologies,” Rita Baranwal, a materials engineer at INL wrote.

Long-established nuclear-energy companies aren’t interested in overturning decades of “business as usual” to gamble on a technology that’s radically different from anything in their portfolios. After all, the LFTR may work but end up being outcompeted on price for the energy it generates.

So instead, most companies are riffing on current LWR and related designs to improve efficiency, safety, and the tortuously slow speed of licensing a reactor.

“To their credit, though, the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] recognizes this and is working with the [Department of Energy] to improve the licensing process as well, while keeping its mission at the forefront: the safety of the public,” Baranwal said. Baranwal is also trying to help companies advance more disruptive designs. After 11 years working in the nuclear-power industry, she left in August 2016 to be the founding director of INL’s new Gateway for Accelerating Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) program.

Per Peterson, a nuclear scientist at the University of California at Berkeley, likened GAIN to NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services — a program that helps commercial spaceflight startups like SpaceX get going.

“You can look at a large company like [United Launch Alliance] and compare its capability to develop rocket designs with SpaceX. The big, incumbent nuclear firms face issues around technological lock-in. And they can’t avoid it because of the scale they have to work and operate,” said Peterson, who is also on Flibe Energy’s board of advisors.

“I think there’s real potential for small-scale businesses,” he said. “It’s like with biotechnology: a small company will get a drug through phase two or three trials, then large pharmaceutical companies pick it up.”

Even if a small demonstration LFTR works, it isn’t guaranteed to scale up. Some unforeseen design issues may rear their ugly heads. And there are two other things that Baranwal, Gougar, Petti, and others can’t help with: market forces and people.

I don’t know when we will build an economically viable molten-salt power plant that is a squeaky clean, reliable, and burns nuclear fuel as well as Sorensen promises, same as with fusion — an oft-cited alternative to fission reactors — that is “still decades away from the production of a fusion power plant that generates more energy than it consumes.

LFTR could be a super-safe slam dunk for commercial power, but antinuclear (or anticompetitive) interests could threaten its future. And if the technology can’t compete with natural gas, wind, solar, hydroelectric, legacy nuclear power plants, and more, it could just be a failed business venture — Weinberg’s desert-oasis metropolises be damned.

That doesn’t mean it’s not worth trying: The stakes will only get higher as we use up fossil fuels and humanity’s numbers grow.

And as for Sorensen, the LFTR is certainly a dream worth chasing.

“This is something that’s going to benefit their future tremendously; it’s going to lead to a new age of human success,” he said, speaking to readers. “And if they want that, they need to be talking to their elected officials and demanding it, in fact, and saying ‘we want to see these things happen.’ Because only a society that decides to embrace this kind of technology is going to ultimately realize it’s benefits.”


Dr Churchill


Plenty of food for thought here.

And as a StartUp this Thorium reactor company is something to watch.

Because it maybe a Unicorn in the making…

After the discovery that the manufactured & salaciously fake Trump dossier was the only real Russian collusion during the elections of 2016, it becomes evident that finally the Clintons are leaving the American political & public proscenium for good.

Yet they leave behind a nasty legacy of murders, lies, and lawlessness.

Bill Clinton’s shameless behavior, with his perjury, and his obstructions of justice led to his impeachment, but he escaped that fate, whereas Hillary was flat out rejected by the American public, because of Hillary’s serial deceptions, constant lying, and her grotesque mishandling of classified information.

All of these issues militated against her, and led to her thumping defeat.

Her manufacturing of the Trump dossier however, and its sheer negative impact on American public life, may be her most infamous “achievement” out of her whole life of spreading BS and negativity to this country. And we can now safely say that her campaign — and ultimately Hillary herself — bear grave responsibility along with key members of the media and the government who also share in that responsibility, and now, they need to own up to it…

Because the “salacious and unverified” Trump dossier and the attendant debate about the documents within it — has invaded the body politic like a cancerous mole.

And although the Mueller investigation has concluded, and Mueller’s declaration of complete exoneration and total innocence for President Trump has now entered the public record through the words of the Special prosecutor that “The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities” most people still have lingering fears that the witch-hunt will continue for some time by the Democrats rear guard actions.

But it’s worth reflecting on how the contrary view — the firm conviction that Trump did coordinate with Russia — became so deeply embedded in the hearts and minds of millions of Americans. And it’s worth reflecting on why another set of Americans could look at actual, troubling evidence of Russian contacts and simply not care at all.

The answer is complex, but at its heart is a set of documents compiled into a collection known as the “Steele dossier.” The dossier, characterized by James Comey under oath as “salacious and unverified,” consisted of opposition research compiled by a former British intelligence officer and commissioned by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Taken as whole, it undermined the credibility of American intelligence agencies, corrupted elements of the media, and distorted the public debate. It may well be one of the most malignant documents in modern American history.

The most immense and dangerous public scandal in American history is finally cracking open like a ripe pomegranate. The broad swath of the Trump-hating media that has participated in what has amounted to an unconstitutional attempt to overthrow the government are reduced to reporting the events and revelations of the scandal in which they have been complicit, in a po-faced ho-hum manner to impart to the misinformed public that this is as routine as stock market fluctuations or the burning of an American flag in Tehran.

For more than two years, the United States and the world have had two competing narratives: that an elected president of the United States was a Russian agent whom the Kremlin helped elect; and its rival narrative that senior officials of the Justice Department, FBI, CIA, and other national intelligence organizations had repeatedly lied under oath, misinformed federal officials, and meddled in partisan political matters illegally and unconstitutionally and had effectively tried to influence the outcome of a presidential election, and then undo its result by falsely propagating the first narrative. It is now obvious and indisputable that the second narrative is the correct one.

The instigators, the “authors”, the accomplices, and even the dupes of this attempted overthrow of constitutional government are now well along in reciting their misconduct without embarrassment or remorse because—in fired FBI Director James Comey’s formulation—a “higher duty” than the oath they swore to uphold the Constitution compelled them. Or—in fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s words—“the threat” was too great. Nevermind that the nature of “the threat” was that the people might elect someone he and Comey disapproved of as president, and that that person might actually serve his term, as elected.

The extent of the criminal misconduct of the former law enforcement and intelligence chiefs is now notorious, but to make the right point here, it has to be summarized. The fact that the officially preferred candidate lied to federal officials about her emails and acted in outright contempt of Congress and the legal process in the destruction of evidence, was simply ignored by the FBI director, who announced that she would not be prosecuted, though he had no authority to make that determination.

The dossier of salacious gossip and defamatory falsehoods amassed by a retired British spy from the lowest grade of intelligence sources in Russia, commissioned and paid for by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, was circulated to the media by high public officials and cited in illegal and dishonest applications to authorize surveillance of the campaign of the other presidential candidate. A special counsel was empowered on the false pretext of the necessity to get to the bottom of Trump-Russian collusion in the election, of which there was and remains no evidence, because it did not occur and was a complete partisan fabrication.

The special counsel then packed his staff with militant Clinton partisans, and acted very late and only when his hand was forced by the media to remove two officials who referred in texts to each other to the Bureau’s ability to smear and provoke the impeachment of the winning candidate as “an insurance policy” against his filling the office to which he was elected.

Large sections of the media colluded with the Democratic campaign and produced the doctrine that anything was justifiable, no matter how dishonest, to destroy the incoming president’s reputation and damage him in public opinion polls to legitimize attempts to remove him from office. Large sections of the media deliberately deluged the public with stories they knew to be false about the new president and referred to him in terms of unprecedented vituperation in what purported to be reportage and not comment.

This unorganized but widespread campaign of defamation was taken up by a great number of ordinarily newsworthy celebrities and was accompanied by false, unresearched stories denigrating President Trump’s supporters, such as the more recent false claims about Catholic school students’ treatment of an elderly native American and the false claim that actor Jussie Smollett had been beaten up and reviled by Trump supporters. The former intelligence chiefs of the nation under President Obama repeatedly have accused this president of treason, the most heinous of all crimes, and have asserted with the authority of their former positions that the Russians determined the result of the 2016 presidential election. They knew this to be entirely false.

The special counsel has failed to find any evidence of the collusion and electoral interference that was the justification for establishing his inquiry, and the Democrats are already expressing disappointment in his failure to produce such evidence when the leading Democratic members of congressional investigative committees still robotically claim to have at least prima facie evidence of such collusion.

The dishonest attempt of much of the opposition and what even left-leaning media-monitoring organizations record as 90 percent of the national media, continued for more than two years to try to condition the country to believe that the president had committed the “high crimes and misdemeanors” required by the Constitution for impeachment and removal from office.

The special counsel, apart from smearing the president, distracted public attention from or tended to justify the ever more evident misconduct of the president’s enemies. And we now know that Comey, despite his “higher duty,” lied to the president about his not being a target of an FBI investigation, illegally leaked to the New York Times the contents of a self-serving memo he purloined from the government, and lied to Congress by claiming 245 times in one sitting to be ignorant of recent matters that no one of sound mind could have forgotten.

And now we have Andrew McCabe’s proud confirmation that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein not only continued the illegal counterintelligence investigation of President Trump, but actively discussed methods of securing his removal from office by deliberate misuse of a variety of laws, including the Emoluments Clause, the 25th Amendment to deal with mental incompetence, and the Logan Act of 1799, which has never been used successfully and has not been tested in 150 years.

This entire monstrous travesty is finally coming apart without even waiting for the horrible disappointment of the special counsel’s inability to adduce a scrap of evidence to justify his replication of Torquemada as an inquisitor and of the Gestapo and KGB at rounding up and accusing unarmed individuals who were not flight risks. The collapse of this grotesque putsch, under the irresistible pressure of a functioning attorney general and Senate committees that are not hamstrung by NeverTrumpers, will cause a revulsion against the Democratic Party that will be seismic and prolonged.

The disgrace of their misconduct is profound and shocking. Richard Nixon, against whom there is no conclusive evidence that he broke any laws (although a number of people in his entourage did) never did anything like this. J. Edgar Hoover in 47 years at the head of the FBI and its predecessor organization, never tried to meddle in a presidential election. Those responsible will pay for this, including at the polls.

I’m not going to link to the dossier, but it’s worth remembering its core claim. As explained in this December analysis in Lawfare, the document not only contained claims that Russia possessed lurid, compromising information on Donald Trump, it also made the sensational allegation that there existed a “well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between [Trump and his associates] and the Russian leadership,” including an “intelligence exchange [that] had been running between them for at least 8 years.” The very existence of this allegation detonated like a bomb in the American body politic.

It had an obvious distorting effect on the intelligence community and parts of the American government. To be clear, I believe that the Trump-Russia investigation would have existed even without the dossier — I’m with Trey Gowdy on that point. As Devin Nunes wrote in his famous February 2018 memorandum alleging FISA abuse, information about George Papadopoulos triggered the opening of the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016. Moreover, the multiplicity of problematic Trump-team contacts with Russians or Russian operatives justified an investigation regardless of the dossier’s contents or the dossier’s use by the FBI.

The dossier was used to form a crucial part of the Carter Page FISA-warrant applications, however: The Nunes memo notes that “Deputy Director McCabe testified . . . that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the dossier information.” In addition, elements of the dossier made it to lawmakers including Harry Reid and John McCain, and the FBI ultimately even briefed then-president-elect Trump about its contents. While the summary it provided Trump is still largely redacted, it is easy to imagine how the existence of such a document could enrage the president.

I urge you to read Chuck Ross’s well-reported account of the comprehensive efforts to “seed the dossier with reporters and government officials.” The efforts were in fact so comprehensive — and the existence of its allegations such an open secret with the press — that I even heard about it in Tennessee during the later stages of the campaign. I was flat-out told that there was evidence Trump had been “compromised” by Russian intelligence.

Salacious rumor-mongering is par for the course in politics. I’ve heard the wildest stories about even the most staid politicians. And when politicians aren’t staid, well, there are no boundaries. To this day, there are folks lurking around the dark quarters of the Internet absolutely convinced that the Clintons are responsible for a string of murders in Arkansas.

But even in the face of widespread rumors, responsible journalists — or journalists who aspire to responsibility — do not print the rumor, at least not without verifying or debunking it. They should not print the rumor even if they know that law enforcement is looking into it.

Let’s try a hypothetical. Imagine if you’re a reporter and you know that local police are investigating a wild claim against a prominent local figure. You’ve started to look into the claim yourself, but so far everything you’ve learned contradicts the allegations. Do you dump it into the public domain anyway, heedless of the impact on the public or the person?

Well, if you’re BuzzFeed, that’s exactly what you do. While it may well be newsworthy that the FBI is looking into claims that Trump is “compromised,” there’s a vast difference between that factual report and just tossing a raw opposition-research file into the public square and telling people to “make up their own minds.”

That makes no sense. None. Between taking kids to soccer practice and dance lessons, parents aren’t able to determine whether Michael Cohen went to Prague. As I wrote at the time, “individual Americans aren’t free-standing intelligence agencies, ready and able to investigate alleged Russian operations in Moscow.” If a journalist hears a claim, he should investigate. Not punt to the public.

BuzzFeed’s decision had two immediate effects. First, it demonstrated the extent to which an influential media outlet would depart from best practices when it possessed negative allegations against Trump. Second, the instant the claims were published, millions of Americans became convinced they were true. Combine the recent pain of a shocking electoral loss, Russia’s intervention in the campaign to help Trump and sow chaos generally, Trump’s incredibly odd behavior toward Putin, and the emerging reports (some overblown) of unusual contacts between Trump’s team and Russians or Russian assets, and Democrats were primed to believe the worst. Moreover, the dossier’s memo formats, which looked like movie versions of intelligence reports, enhanced their public credibility. They were official-looking.

And so we were off to the races. An odd sort of consensus developed on the left and the right. In essence, it was this: The dossier is the scandal. On the left, a kind of blind faith emerged that the purpose and ultimate inevitable outcome of the Mueller investigation were to prove the core claims (if not all the specifics) of the dossier. People weren’t singing songs to Mueller with the expectation and hope that he’d simply lay out the facts. They believed that they already knew the facts, it was up to Mueller to come through with the proof.

On the right, when the dossier became the scandal, that meant that misconduct — even lies about contacts with Russians or Russian assets — that fell far short of the dossier’s grandiose claims was treated simply as no big deal. If a meeting with a Russian lawyer with the intention of getting damaging information about Hillary Clinton or alleged efforts to establish back-channel communications with WikiLeaks through Roger Stone fell far short of the dossier’s claims, then they were nothing to worry about — a distraction from the “real” scandal of the “Russia hoax.”

Moreover, a veritable industry sprang up that attempted to tie the entire Trump-Russia investigation to the dossier, to somehow prove that absent the dossier, there never would have been a comprehensive investigation of Russian contacts with the Trump campaign, much less a special counsel. Troubling conduct and contacts by Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and others were swept aside as meaningless. The dossier was the chief weapon in the effort to delegitimize the investigation itself, and it was a potent weapon indeed.

For all of their other accomplishments, the Clintons are leaving American public life with a legacy of lies and lawlessness. Bill Clinton’s shameless behavior, perjury, and obstruction of justice led to his impeachment. Hillary’s serial deceptions and her grotesque mishandling of classified information led to her defeat. The dossier, however, in its sheer negative impact on American public life, may be her most infamous “achievement.”

Her campaign — and ultimately Hillary herself — bears responsibility for the chaos it sowed, because the dossier redefined the Presidential debate, as if it was some kind of cancer, that sickened our American culture and our Democratic and Republican politics.

And today, our nation is weaker because that fake document entered the bloodstream of the body politic, doing maximum damage that the Russians or anyone else cold never have done from the outside.

And we have Hillary Clinton and Obama to thank for it along with a compliant and cooperating mass media, television, and newspaper industry who all together along with some deluded members of Congress and Senate, seem to be really working for the Russians and the FSB…


Dr Churchill


Without realizing the proportions of the emergency, America has survived the greatest constitutional crisis since the Civil War. All those who legitimately oppose or dislike the president, including traditional high-brow Republicans who find him distasteful, should join in the condemnation of this largely criminal assault on democracy, and then, if they wish, go out and try to beat him fair and square, the good old-fashioned way, in a free election. But they must abide by the election’s result.

Screen Shot 2019-02-28 at 10.58.54 AM

Human industry, Civilization, Automobiles, Air Travel, and Flatulating Cows — all contribute to some serious global warming, and that in turn according to the United Nations Climate Organization, has caused the 3.7mm Sea Level Rise, that we apparently experienced over the last years.

Apparently, climate change is making the seas rise faster than ever, and this appears to be what the UN wants to warn us about so that we can change our lives around and start wearing a hair shirt while flogging ourselves for our sins on the way to till the fields by ourselves without the benefit or assistance of any cows, bulls, draft horses, mules, or even donkeys, because all of these beasts fart a whole lot of methane out the back end and that causes sea level rising…

On an aside António Guterrez, Secretary-General of the United Nations allowed men to draft their wives and place them under the yoke so that they pull the plow, reasoning that large human barnyard animals are better suited for this job, since the cows flatulence is a pathogen for our climate.

This the UN chief, had said after he had just warned the world that last years’ sea level rise had hit an unprecedented 3.7 millimeters. Apparently, the sea levels across the world are rising faster than ever, according to the United Nations that has warned us, that we urgently need to increase our action to stop dangerous climate change.

In a report released on Thursday, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), a UN agency, painted a dire picture of all the key indicators of global warming.

The last four years were the warmest on record, concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are at record levels and rising, and a global average sea level rise of 3.7 millimetres in 2018 outstripped the average annual increase over the past three decades.

The findings in the group’s annual State of the Climate report will bolster efforts by António Guterres, the UN secretary-general, to make governments commit to more ambitious carbon cuts at a landmark summit in September.

“There is no longer any time for delay,” wrote Guterres in a foreword to the report.

Last year was the fourth warmest on record, bringing the global temperature 1°C warmer on average than before the industrial revolution.

The WMO Press Release is available here, the actual report is available here.

Of course the report predicts more rapid sea level rise in the future. From page 16 of the report:

Over the period January 1993 to December 2018, the average rate of rise was 3.15 ± 0.3 mm yr-1, while the estimated acceleration was 0.1 mm yr-2.

If the UN estimate is correct, starting from 3.15mm per year this would result in a sea level rise of around:

d = vt + 0.5at2
d = 3.15 x 80 + 0.5 x 0.1 x 802
d = 572mm or just under 2ft of sea level rise by the end of the century.
If this rate of sea level rise per year continues, our children’s children might have to deal with 2ft of additional sea level by the end of this century.

Unlike others, I’m not immediately afraid of what the Green New Deal would do to the economy and our government. After all, this isn’t going to pass — not today, not any time soon certainly, but after reading the Green New Deal, I’m mostly afraid of not being able to get through this with a straight face, so I write today to you, because I want to consider the Green New Deal with the seriousness it deserves.

The Cold War as we all know, was won without firing a shot, but overcoming Communism in the 20th century is the way to kill the Green New Deal while overcoming climate change in the 21st century, hopefully without firing shots at each other…

Dr Churchill


Talking about the weather… can be rather dangerous these days amongst the fools all around and especially inside the UN…

Screen Shot 2019-02-14 at 1.04.52 AM

Posted by: Dr Churchill | March 26, 2019

Indeed the Moon is made of Swiss Cheese…

President Trump has promised big things in Space, and yet most of his plans and promises, haven’t even been accepted by the various organizational leaders that command the United States Space program as real…

We now know how the AirForce killed the separate Space Command, and how the Space companies have sidelined the Space Councel, but what we don’t know is what is going to happen with NASA and her endeavors for the future.

Vice President Mike Pence gave us an inkling today by saying this on his speech about Space and America’s involvement in its exploration.

“It is the stated policy of this administration and the United States of America to return astronauts to the moon within the next five years,” Pence said. Trump weighed in with this statement: “This time, we will not only plant our flag and leave our footprint, we will establish a foundation for an eventual mission to Mars and perhaps, someday, to many worlds beyond.”
–Mike Pence VP on October 5th of 2017.

Yet this talk sounds eerily familiar… like the past one herewith:

And just as familiar, once again is how NASA isn’t getting any “new money” out of the existing budget in order to accomplish the lofty goals, despite VP Mike Pence’s laying out good reasons for going to the Moon and beyond, as Vice President Mike Pence tasked us with “landing humans on the Moon by 2024.”
–Mike Pence VP on March 26th of 2019. []

The NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine replied: “We are up for the challenge.”
–Jim Bridenstine (NASA Admin) on March 26th of 2019.
[One could learn more about NASA’s plans to use our Space Launch System to send Orion to lunar orbit:

Indeed to an uninterested and casual observer with deep knowledge of government budgets and agency requirements along with a cost cutting accountant’s savvy for mission budgets — it might seem that the Trump administration is playing pretty much the same game that was played by Bill Clinton, and by both Papa-Bush and Bush Jr, as well as the game played by Obama in their exhortations about going off of our home-rock and into space: Promise them the moon (or Mars, or an asteroid) because it sounds really good, but don’t do anything of substance, in order to actually support that stated space exploration goal.

Am saying that because if Americans are going to be landing on the moon in five years — we best expect someone other than NASA, someone in the private sector to be behind this lofty goal and magnificent achievement.

It has to simply be a private mission of exploration, because the U.S. Government’s space program can’t even fly circles around the Earth anymore, without the Russian Soyouz providing the “Taxi-ride” to the Space station.

Back in the day of our space infancy, President John F. Kennedy promised the moon to all of us, when he gave us the famous 1962 Moonshot speech, but he also gave NASA a huge round of funding in order to make the Moonshot achievable. His dream actually happened because of that, and for about five years running, the space agency’s budget was in the stratosphere compared to the $21 billion earmarked for 2019 — peaking at twice the current amount – accounting for inflation.

Getting to the moon was not cheap then, and it certainly is not going to be cheap today.

Because going back to the Moon is not going to be like the last time, and it is not going to be any easier than last time…

Regardless — today the Trump Administration has pledged to put humans back on the moon within five years.

But the promise rings hollow in the context of history.

Because without another JFK-like commitment, and without some serious funding approved by Congress, the U.S. government will never put humans on the moon again, let alone send anyone to Mars.

It’s a sad truth for space exploration fans. But just look at the history of similar promises:

We got to the moon during President Richard Nixon’s watch (every human who ever visited the moon did so during Nixon’s presidency). But Nixon also presided over the end of human lunar exploration, opting instead to launch development of the space shuttle, which from 1981 to 2011 allowed astronauts to fly in circles around Earth.

Once Nixon shifted political space gears, his immediate successors held the course. Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan didn’t envision or articulate anything beyond near-Earth spaceflight during their presidencies.
Then, finally, a vision.

On July 20, 1989, President George H.W. Bush proposed putting humans back on the moon and eventually sending people to Mars. ‘’Our goal is nothing less than to establish the United States as the preeminent spacefaring nation,” the elder Bush said.

Nothing even remotely close happened. And then Bill Clinton’s space policy focused on Earth and space science, not human exploration of the great beyond.
Not to be outdone by his father, George W. Bush rekindled hopes of humans exploring the final frontier.

“Inspired by all that has come before, and guided by clear objectives, today we set a new course for America’s space program,” W said in an uplifting speech at NASA headquarters on Jan. 14, 2004. “We will give NASA a new focus and vision for future exploration. We will build new ships to carry man forward into the universe, to gain a new foothold on the moon and to prepare for new journeys to the worlds beyond our own.”

Bush the younger laid out three goals:
1. Return the space shuttle to flight (after the 2003 Columbia disaster) and finish the International Space Station.
2. Develop a new crew exploration vehicle.
3. “Return to the moon by 2020, as the launching point for missions beyond.”

Barack Obama put the kibosh on work instigated by Bush, replacing it with a new policy that pushed the goal — both the physical one and the timing, way out there: “We’ll start by sending astronauts to an asteroid for the first time in history,” Obama said on April 15, 2010. “By the mid-2030s, I believe we can send humans to orbit Mars and return them safely to Earth. And a landing on Mars will follow.”

Again, nothing happened, and in fact the space shuttle stopped flying under Obama and NASA had to start bumming rides from the Russians to get to the aging space station.

Let’s now push our dreams for Space Exploration back in the calendar, because we need to have them launched forward from today onwards.


Dr Churchill


But let’s hope that the President and Congress will come up with some solid funding for this project, because the Russians and the Chinese are eating our cheese out there.

Apparently, they have all figured out that this giant wheel of Swiss cheese that we call the Moon, is quite tasty, and the fondue made of it, can be rather rewarding…

Today it is revealed that the United States debt has mushroomed to $22 Trillion and a good third of the foreign publicly held debt, is owed to China…

As of October 2018, foreigners owned $6.2 trillion of U.S. debt, or approximately 39 percent of the debt held by the public of $16.1 trillion and 28 percent of the total debt of $21.8 trillion.

Now wait a minute here…

Why is it that nobody amongst the two major parties is talking about this?

Are they waiting for an Independent to speak up?


Or maybe because all advocates of a stronger US monetary policy are currently sidelined by both the Dems and the Republicans.

Because they both think that they can kick the can down the road indefinitely, and also because even the hawks of foreign and monetary fiscal currency policy, all argue amongst themselves — if this a “Too Big To Handle” issue, and “Too Difficult To Solve” therefore an “Impossible To Tackle” government matter.

Yet, as an Independent, I must say that our collective failure to tackle the Chinese monetary policy battle and our unwillingness to scale the “Chinese Monetary Firewall” and breach the defenses of the Chinese enforced devaluations of the Yuan, have resulted in the cataclysmic events that we are now facing in our Deficits and Huge National Debt.

Along the way the Chinese masterminds, have caused the US debt problem and the subsequent global misalignment of all FX and of all global currencies, because they want to destabilize the US Dollar in order to dethrone the United States fort he global pole position.

And that is a devastating problem globally, but more immediately an American problem that demands a drastic solution, and the application of Executive Action from the White House, such as the forced depreciation of the dollar in equal measure to that of the Chinese currency’s depreciated value of the last many years…

We need parity of current values and a “Monetary Detente” in order to avoid mutually assured monetary war and economic destruction.

And to get there we need to fight.

That simple solution is what is needed.

But does this beleaguered President have the stomach for this expanded fight that has no obvious winners and losers — yet long term it will guarantee our economic sovereignty?

Maybe he does and maybe he doesn’t, because now he seems to seek easy and newsworthy easily understood mini-victories…

But he doesn’t seem to be savvy enough to engage in this gigantic and largely unheralded fight.
Because what this fight might need, is a Master leader who understands economic policy and the fact that a country, unlike an Enterprise — cannot restructure through bankruptcy.

Indeed the longer we wait for dealign with this disease — the more likely is that when the trauma to our economy is felt — it will be so devastating that it will render the Untied States into a second rate power.

Obviously that is not welcome news to most of us, but the necessary adrenalin needed to tackle this issue now, seems to be lacking in the current administration hamstrung by the errant Democrats and their never ending investigations akin to witch hunts of Salem in the days of yore.

Obviously a President who is prosecuted as a 16th century witch, cannot engage in frontline fighting that the Monetary Policy war, requires.

So let us hope that a new Independent minded person can focus on that monetary policy large scale war, instead of a tiny territorial trade battle skirmish, that only makes Mr Prez look good.

Because if we want to see long term equitable relief action that will not cause a loss of buying power for the American citizens, their savings, & their pocketbooks — we need to pick up our armor and go out for pitched battle of the mentally demanding Monetary Policy War, the kind of War that is so Meta that even Econometrics professors don’t even understand how it is waged….

Indeed this monetary policy misalignment, and the resultant exploitation of the FX currency markets, and interest rates, by the Chinese government, along with the constant production and issuance of fake economic data by China — has been the main cause of a rising trade deficit and increasing national debt in America over the last 30 years…

That is the “Phat Chinese Wave” that is coming crashing across the Pacific, each and every day, and it affects America in a damaging, dissonant and discordant way — each and every economic transaction, sale, and banking service, that we allow this to happen to ourselves…

And thus today even the prudent and fiscally conservative (in theory) President Trump’s attempts to deal with the currency issues in trade negotiations with China, along with his constant public complaints about a strong dollar — seem unlikely to change anything in the substantial and dramatic fashion that this grave issue for our Republic requires.

This matter requires our utmost attention, and if we add to that, the effects of five consecutive increases of the FED’s interest rates — you have the makings of an economic policy disaster, because the “strong dollar” due to hikes in interest rates, matters greatly for all the producers and the economic actors of these United States.

To address this inequity, matters greatly, because this situation, has led to near-record deficits in manufactured goods, and non-oil & non-gas goods, that are being masked by increases in exports of oil & gas, and all services.

In consequence, it is that which makes the US’s trade balance far worse than what the official data that is released would reflect. So my advise is that we should watch out for the Monetary Policy battles and not so much to the much ballyhooed tariffs of the news-worthy Trump trade war that has been made into a catchy tune all over the news…

Because that is a side show and the real show is the Monetary Policy battle between the two countries.

Indeed it appears that there’s a lot of underhanded stuff that is going on below the surface over there in Beijing’s Financial Street, and tin the palace of the bureaucrats of the Communist party, and it is this kind of stuff that we can’t even see, and yet it is equivalent in perspective to the unseen, and unobserved, underside of the underwater size of the Chinese iceberg, that is currently threatening our economy and our supremacy as a nation.

Even President Donald Trump’s, attempts to stop the trends of the past Obama presidency’s dismal monetary policy years — while bucking economists’ expectations for growth and wealth creation for all Americans — still hold the keys to the true trade deficit not just through his fight for installing tariffs and creating equalization with our main trading partner globally, but by waking up to the reality of the monetary war that is going on, and choosing to engage in that “monetary policy knife fight.”

Even though he wants to avoid cuts and bloodshed — this a fight that needs to be fought sooner rather than later.

But this President is not willing to open up another front in these difficult times for his administration as the paid provocateurs in the employ of China, have actively started to undermine him inside Congress and the DOJ.

Yet, some measure of hope shows from the new economic data (to be released officially tomorrow on Wednesday) that will show the US deficit in goods and services with the world, to have just topped $600 billion by the end of 2018.

What that means, is that Trump’s presidency will have seen the U.S. trade shortfall’s hump — that is the main metric by which we judge nations to be winning or losing — growing by more than $100 billion.

Although public economists don’t like to dwell too much on the U.S. trade balance, it remains by and large, an accounting measure that often moves in directions inverse to the health of the economy.

The U.S. trade deficit’s biggest contraction on record came in 2009 when it shrank by more than $300 billion in a single year as a result of the recession that was then under way, and the resulting collapse in U.S. demand for imported goods. As a result largely of that slump the U.S.’s goods and services deficit with the world contracted by more than $200 billion over President Barack Obama’s eight years in office.

This is a major reason why economists say, that You really don’t want this as your scorecard, because it is not an accidental trimming mechanism of deficits and economic health at the Macro level. Nor is it a monetary policy lever at the Executive policy level.

It is what it simply purports to be. A simple telltale signal, that when things are booming we consume more imports, and when the economy is in the dumps, we consume far less imports as well. yet, despite the name, trade deficits tend to have less to do with trade policy than with the broader macroeconomic policy and experience a certain ragtime between establishment of policy and results of said macro-economic policies.

The main long-term driver of persistent trade deficits since 1975 has been the gap between the US’s low savings rate and its attractiveness as an investment destination, fueled partly by the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency. That in turn leads to a stronger dollar, which in itself helps increase the trade deficit by lowering the real cost of imports and increasing the local-currency cost of American goods in overseas markets.

In the first 11 months of 2018 the U.S. deficit in goods and services with the world increased $52 billion, or about 10 percent, from the same period in 2017. If that pattern holds in the December data released Wednesday — and economists predict it will — the deficit will have widened to about $610 billion in 2018. In 2016 it was $502 billion.

Screen Shot 2018-11-04 at 8.07.52 AM

The immediate drivers of the surge in the trade deficit under President Trump have been the fiscal expansion, the lower taxes for the middle class and indeed for all the consumers, and the overall spending resulting from the tax cuts President Trump has pushed through Congress aided by the stronger dollar that resulted, from the hyper-juiced economy that the lower taxes economic wealth creation and societal economic expansion have helped create.

However the economic boost from tax cuts has also helped lift the inherent value of the US currency, and it is this very feature of his macro-economic policies that Trump’s supporters insist he needs to be tackling right now. A weaker dollar will help employment locally and will also help the President’s trade negotiations with China and other U.S. trading partners. Trump economic policy supporters, also point to his renegotiation of NAFTA and all other treaties, as something that will help reduce the US trade deficit in the long run, but for now it only helps balloon the value of the dollar to an illusory and unsupportable height.

Yet, we must not forget that Trump’s economic & trade policy have also intentionally contributed to the growth of the trade deficit in 2018, because now we can negotiate with the Chinese from loftier target towards any reasonable reductions in trade deficits that can be offset by the Chinese currency’s fake devaluations and arbitrary hold-backs of the Yuan. Indeed, the tariffs that the President had originally threatened and then went ahead and imposed on Chinese imports — have caused a rush by importers to get ahead of the new duties, and that has fueled a significant and temporary increase in all incoming traffic at West Coast ports last year — that has registered as an increase in the trade deficit.

As a matter of fact, the retaliatory tariffs that President Trump provoked from China, have also hit major U.S. agricultural exports such as soybeans, and it is here where the President proved particularly useful in standing up for the American farmers and small time soybean growers…

Moreover, the showmanship of President Trump, along with his tariff threats and the game of brinkmanship of President Trump’s deal making and deal breaking power, and his apparent complete disregard for the consequences of imposing tariffs on long standing trading partners from China to the European Union, has also contributed to the slowdown in those economies and therefore their demand for American goods.

This is something that can easily be fixed with monetary policy adjustments and interest rate tweaking by the FED chair and the regional offices…

however because this monetary policy is elusive i coming our way — President Trump and his economic advisors, ministers, secretaries and even the well educated and monetary economic policy knowledgable supporters — have all cast the blame on the Federal Reserve, arguing that its decisions to hike rates last year contributed to the strengthening of the dollar.


Dr Churchill


Today, for the first time, President Trump also announced that a stronger dollar has weakened his hand in his trade wars and put a damper on U.S. growth, and it is an act of sabotage from within our own borders, to stop America from becoming the Great Economic Engine of the World and allowing China to remain way back in our own dust cloud…

But I foresee that President Trump will rejoice in they booming race between the two economic giants — the two largest economies in the World — and I forecast that we Americans will the race all over again and forever as we remain UNITED and PRODUCTIVE through our INNOVATION SPIRIT and our LIBERTY to think, create, and iterate.

God Bless America.

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 5.11.46 PM

In plotting the infamous “Coup D’Etat” of the Deep State acting against the United States, that sought to get President Trump impeached, both FBI and Justice Department officials, conspired with the Hillary Clinton and the DNC, and in the process totally trashed the Constitution of these United States…

Republicans on House and Senate Judiciary Committees have called on former acting FBI Director McCabe to testify because as North Carolina Republican Rep. Mark Meadows says, while the former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe is no longer a credible witness, he needs to testify before Congress again.

The most egregious anti-democratic actions ever taken by the “Deep State” are confirmed with the publication of fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s new book detailing how the FBI and Justice Department plotted to remove President Trump from office for firing FBI Director James Comey.

Justice Department and FBI officials spied on U.S. citizens with false warrants, gave a pass to one presidential campaign with a predetermined investigation, investigated another political campaign on the basis of no verified evidence, and illegally leaked information on investigations. They discussed wiretapping and using the 25th Amendment to the Constitution to remove President Trump, and appointed a special counsel as a retaliatory move for Comey’s firing.

It is now crystal clear that the highest echelons of the Justice Department and FBI had morphed from the world’s most professional law enforcement organization into a Third World rump group. They had the hubris to believe that they – not the American people or their duly elected representatives – should decide who governs and how.

They closely cooperated with a Clinton operative and foreign agents hired by Perkins Coie (Hillary’s law Firm), they spied on the Trump presidential campaign on behalf of the DNC, they upended our electoral process, they influenced voters, they fanned partisan political flames, they distorted our foreign policy by isolating us from Russia, and they massively abused the power of their respective non-political positions and government offices.

Remember that McCabe, Comey and the intelligence community heads all publicly testified to Congress even after the Comey-Trump meetings and memos that no investigation had been tampered with in any way. None.

Yet upon President Trump’s firing of Comey, the remaining officials didn’t wait for the proper appointment of a new FBI head. Instead, they worked themselves up into an unfounded hysteria and acted to create an independent counsel over obstruction that never happened – and was never happening.

Operating a year past his commitment to the president’s lawyers, Mueller needs to finish his investigation, shut down his office, and distribute any remaining cases back to the Justice Department that now has a fully empowered attorney general.

McCabe said he was concerned that the Russia investigation might be snuffed out – but it wasn’t. It was untouched. You need a crime to appoint a special counsel, not a belief that a crime might be committed sometime in the future.

Had FBI officials waited for a new director to be confirmed by the Senate, they might have had a new boss who looked over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants and discovered that the key evidence for them was an unverified dossier from a fired source who had materially lied to the FBI.

Officials might have discovered that the supporting Yahoo News story was actually an echo created by their source and not independent evidence. The new FBI director might have figured out that the dossier came to the FBI not through actual intelligence channels but through an official’s wife who was on the payroll of the dossier-creating company, Fusion GPS.

The new FBI director might have even discovered that dossier was an opposite research operation from Trump opponents instead of real intelligence. The new director might have legitimately pulled back from this reckless course.

But Justice Department and FBI officials – egged on by the infamous Lisa Page and Peter Strzok of the FBI – knew better than to follow the Constitution. They were now on a mission to remove Trump from office for daring to fire Comey; they even thought they were part of the 25th Amendment, which empowers only the Cabinet and Congress to remove the president from office in extraordinary circumstances.

Screen Shot 2019-02-28 at 10.58.54 AM

Realizing that approach wouldn’t work, the FBI and Justice Department officials acted to keep the investigation they created under their supervision and with their friends whom they would appoint. And so rather than allow the new incoming head of the FBI to make these decisions, they acted to empower their buddy Robert Mueller as a special counsel.

Mueller, in turn, hired only Democrats, including a lawyer for the Clintons, and the “insurance policy” was launched and ensconced in power. So a counterintelligence investigation that was formed without probable cause now became the largest criminal investigation in history of a campaign and a presidency, dragging on since May 2017.

Adding to the intrigue is that Comey, McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein all disagree with each other in material ways.

McCabe believes he never lied to investigators and had permission from Comey to leak to the press. Comey says McCabe acted on his own.

McCabe and others say Rosenstein was deadly serious when he discussed invoking the 25th Amendment and wiretapping against President Trump in an effort to remove the president from office. Rosenstein says he was just joking around.

Newly confirmed Attorney General William Barr needs to crack all this wide open. The secret charge to Mueller needs to be released. The FISA warrants need to be declassified.

A grand jury must be empaneled to investigate all this and get testimony from officials under oath, and the certification of the warrants used to wiretap the Trump campaign needs to be fully investigated. Dossier author and former British spy Christopher Steele and Glen Simpson – founder of opposition research firm Fusion GPS – need to be called to the grand jury.

Operating a year past his commitment to the president’s lawyers, Mueller needs to finish his investigation, shut down his office, and distribute any remaining cases back to the Justice Department that now has a fully empowered attorney general.

If Mueller wants to continue instead, he should be required to balance his team with Democrats and Republicans, removing any former Clinton lawyers.

Rosenstein, who never should have been allowed to run this investigation because he was in fact witness, who wrote the memo given to the President Trump that was later used as the justification for firing James Comey — will be leaving the DOJ shortly.


Dr Churchill


McCabe and Comey appear on TV, write books, and have become nakedly partisan, revealing political attitudes no different from Strzok and Page.

They claim that they readily “believed” unsubstantiated information and then took power into their own hands and acted in an unbiased way…

Well, that’s a bridge too far already.

Every Democrat, Republican and independent should stop angling for partisan advantage and agree, regardless of who is helped or hurt, that these officials acted without proper authority and are responsible for unprecedented damage to our democracy and our political system.

I have long feared that as the British people go, so shall the American people go…

Sadly, it has looked for a long time as if the people of Britain have simply allowed themselves to become slaves to the global financial and war industrial complex elite of “Germany Uber Alles.”

It may be that the “Brexit” vote will be seen as the dying gasp of the once proud & independent world leading United Kingdom.

Or it may be sen that the UK was subsumed for all times, in the cesspool of continental subjugation through the inaction of its people.

Indeed it now appears that which the hated National Socialist Adolph Hitler, could not manage through bloody warfare against our proud people — Angela Merkel, the EU bureaucrats, and the French Elysee palace rats, may well have managed in their open warfare against liberty.

Of course, time will tell…

If Brexit doesn’t get enacted — the end is near.

But will it be?

Will Britain finally fail because of the obstinacy of Ms May and her willy bureaucrats?

Will we become subservient as a People?

Or we will find the rushers and the balls to rise up and smash the fascists once again?

Is there a John Wilkes, a John Locke, a Duke of Marlborough, a Horatio Nelson, a Churchill alive today amongst us to stop this travesty and the national slavery?

Who knows?

What we know is that time is running out, and so it seems, is the resolve of the British people.

And consequently the resolve of the American people as well…

Because we are all connected as AngloSaxon people speaking the same language and having the same culture and living through the same values of the Western Civilization.

Where England goes — the United States soon follows.

Mark my words here.

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 5.11.46 PM

So what will happen now?

What will happen now that the referendum that was held three years ago, and the Torry pseudo-conservative government responsible for enacting the results of the people’s referendum has failed to execute?

We’re about to learn the answer to that question imminently.

We are about to be witnesses of history, as the people of the UK have been betrayed by their government.

The British people voted overwhelmingly for “Brexit” three years ago, and their government was tasked as promised, to carry out their wishes and end the European occupation of the Home Islands.

The people wanted to leave the European Union.

Instead, rather than accede to the lawful demands of the people, this government of Teresa May, has conspired to ignore those results, spending most of the intervening time trying to re-litigate the case in order to convince the public that it should not “Brexit.”

At this point, given this coup d’etat against the rule of law, the people of the UK would be justified in any action undertaken to forcibly remove the current government, cast off the parliament, and reform government anew.

In short, they would be right to seize control through violent means and eject the traitors who have effectively abolished the rule of law. Theresa May has been a disgrace, and her latest surrender to the so-called “Remainers” is just the latest betrayal.

At stake is the whole of the UK as a credible institution of government, but once more, the people of the UK, by accepting this, will ratify all the tyrannies that will be heaped upon them in the future. They are accepting a permanent insurrection by the government against the people.

The late 18th century French diplomat, lawyer and philosopher Joseph de Maistre is quoted as having said:

“Toute nation a le gouvernement qu’elle mérite.“

Translated, this is “Every nation gets the government it deserves.” Considering this momentarily, it is essentially correct. People who will permit the rise of tyranny will soon find a tyrant ruling over them. Those who purposefully restrain and restrict their government will maintain its awful power in some semblance of control. It’s a story as old as governments.

Now in the UK, the people on both sides of the referendum held nearly three years ago are permitting the government to delay and obfuscate and confound the exit. It’s shameful, but it demonstrates what happens when a people forget the historical lessons learned through the blood and toil of their forebears. They are permitting their government to abscond with the rule of law. Some might wonder why this should concern the American people, but I believe there exists an important warning in this case.

The problem is that too many in their government have become too thoroughly convinced that they know what’s best for the people, irrespective of the notions of the people. They believe their ideas are superior to an extent that they need not heed the rightful rule of the people. This is a test of sorts, and at present, the people of Britain are failing it. On the one hand, the portion of the public who lost the vote three years ago are happily going along with the delays of the “Remain” MPs(Members of Parliament). That seems natural enough, but for the foolishness of such a stance. They are setting themselves up to be just as thoroughly overruled in similar fashion by the other side of some issue at some future point, but of course, being a traitorous lot now, they expect that “Remain” would effectively free them from any blow-back.

What they don’t understand is how they are actually laying the groundwork, and the just cause of a civil war.

The voters who won the referendum are contributing to the problem too. Rather than standing firm, insisting that the referendum be enforced whether there’s a “deal” or not, they’ve gone soft. If they permit the forces of “Remain” to prevail, they might just as well surrender now. If they aren’t prepared for bloodshed as the final method by which to enforce the referendum, they are permitting the rule of law to be abolished, and they will shortly get precisely the sort of tyrannical government they deserve. In one sense, this is precisely what’s going on in the United States, and we may see a similar result. Donald Trump was narrowly victorious in 2016, much as Brexit defeated Remain in that same year. Ever since Trump’s election, the people of the political establishment in DC, the so-called “Uni-party,” has carried out a series of both overt and covert attacks and obstructions against his presidency, all designed to nullify the vote of the people. In the same way, the political establishment in the UK has been out to subvert the will of the people since the vote in 2016.

There’s no doubt that we’re talking about the same adversary, in a philosophical sense. For the last two years, the American people have let the media and the Washington DC establishment conspire to negate much of Donald Trump’s agenda. This must end, just as the people of the UK must enforce their will. Some “Remainers” like to point out that it was a non-binding referendum, but that ignores the fact that the government had vowed to abide by the results. The striking part is that the Deep State in the UK also claimed Russian interference in the referendum. The actual effectiveness of any such alleged interference, even if existent, could not have provided the margin of victory for “Brexit.” In the same way the ruling class elites in the DC Uni-party work to implement their agenda and obstruct Trump’s the same can be seen in the UK.

It’s despicable. I am not an advocate for violence in a civilized world, where the rule of law is observed. Sadly, the UK government has decided to ignore and obstruct the will of the people despite former declarations to the contrary. If the British people permit this now, they are surrendering all control over their government. They’re effectively accepting being ruled rather than being rulers. I view this as a warning for we Americans. The same process is playing out. Most Americans want the border secured, and illegal immigrants deported. Most Americans want the drug trade impeded by virtue of less porous borders and strong law enforcement efforts. Most Americans want their government to do their bidding by observing the existing immigration laws, but what they get instead is an effort by the same Uni-party elitists not merely to prevent the imposition of their will, but to actually further the aims of the pro-Amnesty, pro-open borders crowd. In the same way that our will is being defied by our government, the people of the UK are watching their own government betray them. It is despicable, and then some.

Watching the people of the UK let its government disrespect the will of the people as expressed in the 2016 referendum is frightening. It means that most people in a civilized country will refrain from enforcing their will, and that their opposition will only too happily seize the yielded ground. If this is true, it may be true of us, and it may well represent a preview of what we will see in 2020.

However, should our English brothers and sisters wish to take a leaf from our Playbook here in America and enjoy the stratospheric success we’ve had over the last couple of centuries — here is the basis of our admittedly unorthodox, and revolutionary separation from Mother England and the despotic and quite a bit crazy King George who was not unlike the drunk and obnoxious tyrant name Junkers and his dominatrix lady boss named Angela Merkel that is a certain reincarnation of Adolf fvckin Hitler.

And because the Germans have now accomplished their dream of the “Deutch Reich Uber Alles” all over Europe — you must now escape while you can this death trap called European Union.

Here are our original “Divorce Proceedings & Pleadings” from 1776 for you to read and feast your Independent Freedom loving Hearts, and maybe to use it as a guide to the only document you need to send to the errant boys of Berlin and their lackeys in Brussels…

Send them a simple copy of this and it will suffice.

Just change the dates and the names and place it in the mail, asap.

Am sure, upon receipt the Huns and their modern allies, will get the message loud & clear.

Go ahead and send it.

Nothing else is necessary.

Put it in the postal box brothers…

Declaration of Independence

In Congress, July 4, 1776.

“The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

[Note: The above text is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence, the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum. The spelling and punctuation reflect the original text of 1776]

So brothers and sisters…

That’s how we won our Independence and we wish the same for you.

Because of that, you ought to follow the same path that is proven to work well against Tyranny of any sort…

In conclusion, just go down that revolutionary path and be afraid of nothing because it all gonna work out like a charm…

Dr Churchill


These are some photos of the same kind of fascists that we are fighting against today…

Except their names are Merkel & Junckers.

The rest of the context, the fear, the hustle, and the invaluable intrigue and their vast war machine, that we need to fight against — are all the same.

Because — keep in  mind — that we are fighting against undiluted Evil.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.19.37 PM

Above Photo: Ms Merkel & Mr Junckers in an earlier photograph of their incarnations of the 1930’s

The people of the UK, both those who voted to “Brexit” as well as those who voted to Remain, should insist that the government honor that referendum, and make it plain that it will come to violence should the government fail to carry out that instruction from the people.

Ultimately, it’s the only way a people can gain or maintain control of their governments: The credible threat of force if the government should abandon the rule of law and its commitments to the people.

I have long feared that the UK was a harbinger of our own future.

The dystopia George Orwell conjured up in “1984” wasn’t just a prediction for a fascist future, but rather it is, a sad reflection of ourselves in our present day and time.

But let us travel back to a time where Adolf Hitler and his national socialists were ushering a new era and a new order to this world through the muzzle of their guns and their propagandist socialist ideology of fake news, fake ideals, and even more fake “good intentions” that have paved the road to hell with flagstones made out of the burial headstones of Jewish cemeteries…

The NAZIs back then, thought that they were really changing the world one country at a time, through the introduction of this form of national socialism. And it was at this time that the local NAZI agents all over Europe, were inviting the Germans, to assist them in subjugating their own people, as General Franco of Spain did when he asked Hitler and Mussollini to assist him after his failed Coup D’Etat didn’t topple the Spanish Democratic Republic…

Kinda like what happens today with the European Union being led by another generation of Germans behaving like Hun and Goth warriors of yore and bent on subjugating all the various Peoples of Europe///

So in 1936, Hitler came to Spain, in Franco’s aid and defense and together the two armies, with additional support from Mussolini’s Italian legions of light armor and airforce, launched, prosecuted, and won the devastating Spanish Civil War of 1936-39, that was eventually the precursor of the total domination of Europe by the evil and sinister forces of fascist socialism.

That was then and this is now all over again.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.19.37 PM

Look at the funny pantsuits all the totalitarian types wear and tell me if they remind you of anyone else wearing colorful pantsuits habitually, and always hungry for power and corruption…

Now, if you have read Orwell’s book “1984” you might remember the meaning behind the words “Newspeak,” “the Ministry of Truth,” “Doublespeak,” the “Inner Party,” the “Outer Party,” the “Great Enemy,” the “Real News,” and all the other aphorisms and malapropos that the amazingly honest book 1984 sampled and remixed, from a reality that Orwell had experienced as he was recuperating form a bullet wound on his neck resulting from the acts of barbarity performed by the Nazi Germans in Spain during the Civil War, and also from the similarly evil actions against humanity as offered by the fascist Soviet Socialist totalitarianism, expressed during the same pre-second-world-war years of the Spanish Civil War.

That civil war helps to reminds me of what might happen in America if we keep going down that path of evil and wrong headiness, in depriving freedom from the people of this country that was founded on liberty & independence, and not on socialist government coercion, nor on people’s domination and certainly not on human behavior modification, and behavioral controls. America is a country where Human Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness are enshrined on our Constitution, and yet we need to remind the bastards like Facebook’s Zuckerberg and his CIA pals, and the Amazon dickpick Bezos, and all their ilk, about that fact, again and again, and if necessary we need to throw their sorry ass in jail for their many criminal misdeeds in their intentional criminal behavior with people’s lives.

Still going back to the Spanish Civil War, at the time of Orwell’s service to Liberty and Democracy — we must remember that the Socialist fascists of that time were on both sides of the “Socialist manifesto.” On one side we had the German national Socialists, and on the other side we had the Russian International Socialists, and they both were, side views of the same “coin.” A “coin” of evil, tyranny, and laudatory subjugation of the human spirit, and a “coin” that was used exclusively by those who had already made apparent their evil intent to crush the Human spirit, the basic freedom, and the notions of Democracy, wherever they founded it to exist … in the same way as Mark Zuckerberg and his CIA handlers do today through Facebook’s socialist network platform.

To describe this awfulness, this nightmare, and this degradation — it was neither easy, nor scary enough for Orwell, but in his isolation to write it, it was surely a realistic description of what he had witnessed and of his prophetic flow of what was surely to come ahead…

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.24.55 PM

And indeed the scary stuff of the totalitarian sort of surveillance, automation of mass behavior, and control of the whole People through coercion, violence, and murder — abounded during the Spanish Civil War. A war in which he had volunteered as a progressive leftist idealist from London, and where he even brought his young wife, both of them bend on protecting the Spanish Republic and repulsing fascism. Yet as he was fighting on the side of the Republic, Orwell had been targeted, shot and wounded, not by the enemy the NAZI supported forces of Generalissimo Franco,  but by the Soviet Russian commissars who had a score to settle with their ideological brothers who strayed from the fold, and from their tight orthodox socialist embrace.

When Orwell got shot by his fellow Socialists for not “being” exactly like they wanted him to be and behave — the bullet went through his neck and he played dead, laying on a bloody drain of a street of Barcelona full of corpses of youthful Republicans who didn’t toe the line of the Reds who had taken control of the City during the last days of the Republic and instead of fighting the NAZIs they were busy settling scores and killing off all their various political variants of socialism that didn’t ascribe to the Soviet version of Socialism.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.24.15 PM

Thankfully Orwell was left behind, and was discovered alive and spirited to the San Sebastien hospital on the hills of the city, were his life was saved by another English man, member of the Lincoln international brigade. This doctor recounted the story of how he saved the life of the author of 1984, when he was shot in the head and his neck was pierced by his fellow socialists, for not observing the precise orthodox cannon of ideological purity of the masses and that is when the massive surveillance effects of the socialist commissars, had found his faith in Socialism wanting, and they hunted him down and executed him.

Fortunately George Orwell survived, and his ideological knowledge was vastly expanded, while fighting with the International Lincoln brigade to save their democratic Republic, and to preserve Freedom and Dignity for the people of Spain. But it was in Spain, where he witnessed the more frightening dystopia of the Russian Socialists who had come over to fight alongside the International Lincoln brigade and others, supposedly to combat the common enemy the Nazis, in order to save the Republic. Yet having arrived there, the Russian socialists had instead been hell-bent in themselves destroying the Republic, as they were simply interested in depriving the people of all their freedoms, by installing the same version of bloody soviet socialism, because they did not want a variant, or a more free version of that errant philosophy of “democratic socialism” to take root.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.23.16 PM

Because they wouldn’t allow a fork on the road of that “brain software” development project, called the “Archipelago Gulag of socialism” to be developed for fear that they would lose power & control of the “true Marxist-Leninist socialist” narrative.

So they shot him and left him for dead.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.22.36 PM

This evilness of massive effects, and this nightmare of socialist barbarity, was unequaled in the annals of a humanitarian philosophy, and certainly was not something that anyone had warned Orwell or anyone else about it; then or even later. The socialist cruelty and the cannibalism of their own people is surely evidence that the road to hell is  paved with good intentions and  with great gestures of social networked conditions, with a smidgeon of power hungry people who think that they know better that you what is good for your own lives.

Certainly nobody could have warned us about this technological nightmare of surveillance, the socially networked socialism of massive effects, taking hold of our lives today, under the guise of a technologically savvy data rich social network platform named Facebook – either.

Nor did anyone suspect that the 1984 bookish nightmare would be brought to us compliments of our friends at the CIA, contrary to the US Constitution, and to their super secret mandate, that at least means that they can only operate outside of our national shores.

Ohhh the horrors.

Yet here it is, catching us all asleep at the wheel of state, and at the switch of our lives, and at our most vulnerable moments, when we are fast asleep — during Peace time.

Nobody warned us that it would be the one nightmare that you can never wake up from, as it is attacking you in the middle of the night, and you cannot wake up screaming because you are psychologically shackled to it, and because you are neurologically simply too attached to its addictive powers for mind control.

And if you ever wake up in the morning, and realize that you are living inside a nightmare of Orwellian proportions, within todays’ version of 1984, it might seem too late to do anything about it, or you might be too weak to do anything of substance to liberate yourself…

Indeed today’s 1984 is the brainchild of a slew of NAZI era propagandists and more recently CIA & other agency scientists, who worked along commercial entities to bring us some severely amoral humans in technology companies that ushered in the so called Surveillance Socialism, and citizen mind control, in analog and digital fashion.

Of course the social networks are the natural cradle for the digital dystopian technology  apparatus of surveillance socialism, and more specifically today it is all exemplified by the company named Facebook, and assisted by some other companies like Apple and Google who have entropies into that arena of villains and tyrants who work tirelessly against the foundational freedom of the human spirit.

And sadly these evil forces of mind control and psychos have overran our lives and have taken control of our brains and our neurology unbeknownst to us. They’ve done that subversively, and quietly under the guise of offering us useful services, and we lazily engaged with them wholesale, even before we were ready to wake up to this dismal reality of constant surveillance, and the neuroscience terror of the clear and intentional suppression of free will, let alone able to fight against this loss of agency, speech, and control of our personhood…

Do you think that this statement above sounds like an overstatement?

Or a conspiracy theory?


Yet let us examine the evidence…

First let’s look at the known foundational facts, and the possible outcomes, in order to put the pudding to the test…

At its peak the planet’s fourth most valuable company, and arguably its most influential, is controlled almost entirely by a young man with the charisma of a geometry T.A. and the morals of a gnat. Smart and effective but really beholden to screwing everybody around him as a principle and especially screwing his clients and customers.

1984 today is the CIA utilizing Mark Zuckerberg and the Facebook surveillance machine as their cheapest and yet most plentiful human intelligence outfit.

Mark Zuckerberg under the direct control of his CIA handlers, is the totality of Facebook’s professional leadership, and his life has been all about running this massive surveillance company, which calls itself “a social platform” company, yet it is nothing of the sort.

Sure Facebook is a platform that provides a curious service wherein billions of people feel compelled to fill it with personal information and personal content, such as baby photos, food snaps, birthday wishes, agitating news, click-bait, friend requests, pokes, likes, dislikes, loves, hates, anger emoticons, concert promotions, psychotic premonitions of Jewish lizard-men, all kinds of religious bait, ethnic associations, nationalist views, hate and love intertwined with misery seeking company, and all manners of foul and needy hustlers, kooks, evil doers, and dating ambitions, et al.

Screen Shot 2018-11-04 at 8.07.52 AM

Amazingly, no-one of these millions of happy-go-lucky contributors is paid any wages by the “Platform” company for their contributions or for their long hours of Herculean labours. On the contrary, all the FB users are rewarded by being tracked across the web, even when logged out, and consequently strip-mined by a complicated artificial intelligence, that is primarily trained to sort surveilled information into approximately 29,000 predictive data points, which are then made available to CIA, NSA, DIA, and other shadowy world espionage organizations, and then later sold and resold to commercial services and entities, to third party advertisers and other high street parties, who now know everything that can be known about a person, from information that was given willingly and enthusiastically, without interrogations these people under harsh lights, and without the SS pulling out their nails and killing their next of kin in front of their very eyes, and hopefully without the Gestapo trepanning their skull.

And amazingly, none of this information about the FB platform’s nefarious purposes is secret, despite the company’s best efforts to keep it so, and yet somehow, normal freedom loving people still use and love this platform and continue contributing their privileged information voluntarily.

At some point of course, some other foreign intelligence services found ways to “love” this platform, if only because its users have proved shockingly vulnerable to social manipulation — a dark art the Facebook platform company itself has admitted to dabbling in.

In 2014, the company set out to learn whether it could make its users sad, sorry, upset, or even angry on purpose. In short they set out to prove that they could manipulate people at will…


Indeed, they learned that they could, in three easy steps…

When this astonishing breach of user trust became public, the company claimed it wasn’t a big deal, and that many companies did similar things.

Neuroscience was not an experiment then, and it is not an experiment now. The Manchurian candidate of today, does not need to be subjected to rather intrusive brain surgery and the sticking of microchips on people’s hypothalamus any longer.

Indeed no trepanning of anyone’s scull is required at all, in order to control their behavior.

And the fact that human beings’ brains can be hacked is something that I had foreseen in my early book titled: “BRAIN SOFTWARE.”

Of course then it was a descriptive face of hacking the brain, whereas now it is a tried and true method of dong it wholesale for vast numbers of people across America and across the Globe, because now it’s all done seamlessly via the Facebook Apps, the Messenger, and all other ways we interact with our smart phones, and our mobile devises and laptops, computers and connected utility devises across the digital spectrum.

You know the hacking that Facebook describes as their main job, is this type of human behavior hacking and not the machine variety.

Facebook operations of human analytics and behavior modifications, are the real Psychops that it opened the Pandora’s box, and it is now fully operational as we now speak, managing the mood of the people at command, and menacing our lives, because subsequently they control way they we think, we react, and we behave, and certainly they can “assist us” when we set out to take any major decisions about our lives, such as voting and choosing our representatives in a Democratically controlled government of “We The People.”

It is now well understood how Facebook, a seemingly benign tech company founded with the supposed aim of creating “human connection” for dating and more … and instead it is now being used for fvckin all of us, as it is engaged in ripping the American society apart and compromising our civic foundations, by taking away our constitutional rights with a wicked intent and purpose.

Our Republic and our Constitutional Democracy have indeed been undermined because of this massive surveillance apparatus that is designed to also push you to take the “desired choices” in your life, that is, if you are a slightly suggestible sort of human being.

Well, we all are…

And thus we are prisoners in the feeling manipulation machine, this platform that suggest to us the “Right path” of actions and inaction per the advise of Psychops doctors and mood technicians who can regulate to the N degree all of our reactions to the prescribed stimulus, and make us like lab rats to keep running on the treadmill of this voluntary stupidity and mind control platform for the masses.

Inducements are plenty and include the platform’s pleasurable, & frictionless interface, which encourages users to stay, spent plenty of time rooting and posting about, and return. soonest to check this addictive game they are hooked onto, constantly.

It is no large stretch of the imagination, to posit that because human neurotransmitters respond to the platform’s iconic use of a certain shade of blue, and spark with dopamine upon receiving a “like” or “tag” notification, and weird things follow from seemingly unrelated actions…

Think about yourself being the Manchurian candidate each and every day you get behind the computer’s keyboard, or your mobile phone’s click board…

Not even George Orwell could have predicted this dystopia.

This one is all natively created as our Capitalism’s dreaded creation of a Panopticon strictly designed as a boon for the security services.

Facebook, and it’s young leader Mark Zuckerberg, along with Google, Apple, and the other tech giants today, represent the greatest threat to the global liberty in our lifetime, due to their hacking of human beings minds and behaviors.

Maybe breaking-up Facebook’s human social control data monopoly, by force, and heavily regulating its appalling business practices is simply a just remedy for Facebook’s amoral and evil leadership at the hands of not just Zuckerberg but also his chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, and the rest of that corrupt company’s upper leadership.

But with their support by the deep state, and the secret service apparatus, it won’t be easy. Not easy because their grip on the company is the most centralized decision-making structure we have ever encountered in a large company. Their power is possible only because Facebook’s “core platform,” is relatively simple since it consists of a product and a monetization scheme. Non-tech companies with comparable global reach, must deal with complex real-world infrastructure issues as well as the needs of a highly diverse work force. Large corporations also typically create interrelated eddies of economic activity, whereas Facebook’s business model is founded upon sucking the economic activity out of otherwise productive workers. Most troubling of all, a company whose product is used by one-third of the planet has only 30,000 employees. In every imaginable sense, Facebook is a Borg-like drain on the world’s economy. It doesn’t make you better, and it only makes you worse off, and they play your feelings and your  moods, and cause your actions and reactions like a harp, every day.

You now have to admit that you have been played but this nincompoop company that unlike the fossil fuel energy companies — it can’t even get your automobile to drive off to take you on a road trip…

The story of Facebook has been told many times before, but contextualizing its rise within the proper technological history of a panopticon for the security services, has not been said before this. Without the advents of the iPhone, cloud data storage and the industry’s “lean start-up” model, Facebook may well have wandered down the bleak path of the short-lived early-2000s social media entities Myspace and Friendster. The beating heart beneath the floorboards of Facebook headquarters, in its first iteration, was Facemash, a website that invited Harvard students to compare photos of their female classmates and rate them according to their perceived fuckability and score them based on their ease of hookups. The female students’ photos where photographs that Zuckerberg stole from online student housing directories — for the high cause of determining who was “hotter”pursue, or to pester, or even to go torment, and perhaps — eventually — fuck. Or more politely said, to sleep with.

Yes, the world’s fourth most valuable company can trace its origins to the frustrated misogyny of an incel.

The moral vacuousness and moral torpor along with an aptitude for stealing Mark Zuckerberg displayed as a young adult, should have told us something about how he and many other young “disrupters” intended to operate.

You can imagine how attractive a philosophy that absolves practitioners of responsibility for the impact of their actions on others would be to entrepreneurs and investors in Silicon Valley.

The most angry but measured argument against Facebook, is that social media has enabled personal views that had previously been kept in check by social pressure. The kook we will always have with us, to paraphrase Jesus, but the kooks of yore had to work to maintain their kookery and locate fellow kooks.

They had to pick up their kook phone, subscribe to the kook newsletter, drive to the kook convention. Nowadays, all the kook has to do is log in to Facebook, where his feed will be enlivened by the chatter of fellow — and likely more extreme — kooks, toward which Facebook’s algorithms helpfully steer him.

Zuckerberg et al, probably didn’t set out to transform American neo-Nazism and neo-socialism, into this generation’s punk rock, but the psycho-social-behavior-platforms they created, have generated a feedback loop that reinforces and amplifies ideas with a speed and at a scale that are unprecedented.

That is what Surveillance Socialism is all about. And that is the Social Network effect’s dark and sinister secret, that we have all bought into it hook line & sinker…


Screen Shot 2019-02-14 at 8.46.54 PM

The fact that nearly every product or service that begins with the word “smart” or “personalised”,… , is simply a supply-chain interface for the unobstructed flow of behavioural data on its way to predicting our futures is what describes the no-moral-conscience Facebook at best. Because Facebook’s daily actions reveal a robust and helpful itemization of the ways they have always been intentionally evil, and criminal, as we see with every batch of revelatory evilness that comes to light through whistleblowers and through disgruntled ex-employees once every quarter or so.

So there must be quite a lot of scandalous behavior, unethical breaches, and criminal intent, for so much shit to be unearthed so often from the bowels of Facebook, but here is the rub. Because here is a highlighted criminal action that has received scant attention from the mainstream Fake News media,  since it involves your children, the most vulnerable amongst us, and if you had known it, is would have caused you some serious alarm, because Facebook recently was caught having installed Root SSL Certificates on all the young people’s mobile phones who had any interaction with Facebook ever. Not just to the FB users, bit also to their friends and others who replied to Facebook’s IM and other Hydra like tentacles of stealing people’s information and data.

This Root SSL Certificate allowed Facebook engineers, to scoop up all the data and vacuum collect EVERYTHING the young people did, said, or even thought, on the world of web and real life alike — in an indiscriminate machine algorithmic fashion. This was the whale of all data gathering intelligence operations that should wake us all the fvck up. The Facebook handlers of our attention, have been collecting all the browsing history, and all of our digital actions, our passwords, our credit cards and the histories of our financial usage, our GPS locations history, all of our traffic, our web searches, our private information, our identity secrets, our identifying materials, our preferences, our moods our thought expressions, all of our telephone calls verbatim, all of the conversations we had in real time in proximity with the mobile phone from the microphone of this phone operating like Alexa of Amazon in our homes, and they also collected all the meta data of the people you speak, text, or interact with, and so much more.

Everything indeed was scooped up into this whale’s mouth called Facebook data gathering.

One’s entire life was taken to the Facebook cleaners for real.

Here is a Youtube video where they go over the proper SSL caution & how Root Certificates are abused by Facebook in order to break the vaunted https security and collect all your data while tracking you and recording all your personal telephonic interactions with other human beings and/

or machines:

So much about the nature of digital technology as about this new mutant form of socialism that has found a way to use tech for its solipsistic purposes. The name of the game according to Zuckerberg’s Facebook, is to give rise to the new variant is “surveillance socialism”, because it works by providing free services that billions of people cheerfully use, enabling the providers of those services to monitor the behavior of those users in astonishing detail, without ever asking for their consent.

Surveillance Socialism, unilaterally claims human experience as free raw material “Collective ownership” that can be used like the village commons or the kolkhoz, for translation into dollars, and state security, via the usage of our life’s behavioural data and for more sinister uses anyone can monetize and use as such, under the guise of the internet lawlessness.

And although some of these data are applied to service improvement, the rest are declared as a proprietary behavioural surplus, fed into advanced manufacturing processes known as ‘machine intelligence’, and fabricated into prediction products that anticipate what you will do now, soon, and later. Finally, these prediction products are traded in a new kind of marketplace that like behavioural futures markets.

The 1984 Surveillance State Socialists have also grown immensely powerful and even extremely wealthy from these neurological trading operations, so much so, that for many Facebook like companies, there are markets where corporate and state security apparatus agencies, are laying market bets on our future behaviour.

While the general modus operandi of Facebook, Google, Apple, et al has been known and understood by very few people for a while, what has been missing – and what Zuckerberg and his Facebook now provide, is the new level of Evil that have scaled to be sitting atop of the Himalay mountain tops of sinister commerce in trading people’s lives and their very souls. Indeed we need to stop this but first we ought to understand it in order to curtail it.

Necessary insight is needed in order to place it and situate this behavior in a wider context amongst the ravages that it has brought to the global social commons that it has exploited massively and has left behind a lunar landscape that looks unerringly like the Alberta tar sands desolation, that replaced the primary forest that once was there.

And while most of us think that we are dealing merely with algorithmic inscrutability, in fact what confronts us is the latest phase in socialism’s long evolution – from the collective ownership of the means of production, namely the making of products, to the collective mass production, to managerial socialism, to social services, to financial socialism, and now to the exploitation of our lives, through the surveillance state and the personalized as well as massive behavioural predictions, that are covertly derived from the surveillance of all internet and mobile telephony users.

In that sense, this continuation of a tradition that started with the national socialists of Adolf Hitler and rest of the NAZIs, and was only rivaled by the global socialists of Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Derzinsky, & bolshevik variety — has now come to our shores as a stinger missile up our collective “derriere” to promote some of that kind of fvckin that Facebook was initially designed to promote amongst the Harvard coeds.

Today’s digital technology is separating the citizens in all societies into the surveilled and the surveillors.

In other words, Facebook is separating the world’s citizens into two groups: The watchers and the watched…

Can you live like that?

For most of you the answer will be probably a yawning YES.

Yes, because when viewed from this perspective, the behaviour of the digital giant Security apparatus machines like Facebook, looks rather different from the roseate & optimistic hallucinations of the readers and the writers of Wired magazine, or the elite of Media Lab of MIT, and their ilk who are besotted to the Defense appropriations bills, or to the legion of eager beavers from the tech campuses, and their socialist tech promoters, along with the Johnny-come-lately bottom feeders of the digital social network revolution.

But when one sees instead that Facebook is a state apparatus and a ruthless tool of surveillance, the likes of which the founder of KGB Derzinsky, would have been proud — you might modulate your answer to a giant NO.

No, because first of all there is Faqcebook’s arrogant appropriation of users’ behavioural data, that when viewed as a free resource, there are available for the taking by the security apparatus and their lackeys like Facebook, Google, Apple etc. Recently Apple gave all of Roger Stone’s password and data to the FBI without rising up to the privacy protection afforded to jihadist terrorists…

From that action alone it is easy to see why Facebook, Microsoft, Google, Apple, et al, are all collectively “the Evil Empire” as lackeys of the vast security apparatus and their multi-tentacled reach. The use of data mining and algorithmic methods to extract or infer specific data even when users had explicitly denied permission, followed by the use of secret and insidious technologies that are opaque by design and that fostered the necessary user ignorance — is another nail in the coffin of our Free Will, and Privacy.

And, of course, there is also the fact that the entire Facebook data harvesting project is conducted in what is effectively lawless – or at any rate law-free – territory. In the same vain as Facebook – Google decided that it would digitize and store every book and article ever printed, regardless of copyright issues, author’s permission, monetization, or justice and property rights. In the digital commons all is the property of the Collective. Nor was anyone informed that Google street view, would photograph every street and every house on the planet without asking anyone’s permission.

Indeed, when Facebook launched its infamous “beacons”, which reported a user’s online activities, purchases, and habits, and then published them to other peoples’ news feeds without the knowledge of the user — they claimed technological advantage and ignorance of the repercussions of gluing people to the business of always observing and reporting other people’s behavior…

And so on, the new surveillance socialist networked technology operates in accordance with the social network’s disrupter mantra that “it is easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission” once you are set to do evil and you cannot stop yourself from acting upon all of your evil designs…

So when it is revealed that “surveillance is the business model of the internet” we are really only hinting at the reality that Facebook, the CIA, and Mark Zuckerberg have now brought to bear. The combination of state surveillance and its socialist social network counterpart scheme, means that digital technology is separating the citizens in all societies into two groups: the watchers (invisible, unknown and unaccountable) and the watched.

Remember the German  movie about the STAZI years of Soviet style Socialism where everybody watched and reported on everybody else?

That movie was titled: “The Lives of Others.”

We are living in it right now…

This is what Facebook and the surveillance Socialism Networks have brought to us today. has profound consequences for democracy because asymmetry of knowledge translates into asymmetries of power. But whereas most democratic societies have at least some degree of oversight of state surveillance, we currently have almost no regulatory oversight of its privatised counterpart. This is intolerable.

So by now, I hope that we all know about the Facebook criminality, and their association with the nefarious security apparatus agencies, and the jailers of freedom everywhere, but do we know about what to do with them to turn them around?

And is that even possible?

First off, we ought to examine is Facebook could be brought to heel or it is a lost cause and it should declared an appendage of NSA, CIA, DIA, or any of the many other acronyms of the security apparatus that deprives us all of any pretense to privacy.

Maybe if we try to reimagine it — we might succeed, Because despite of my “techno-social-pessimism” I also hope that we have some alternatives to behavioural data-hungry mind altering machines like the Facebook company that could be made into something more benign, and perhaps even socially beneficial, but am not holding my breath for it.

Because indeed it is far more profitable for it to be a method of intelligence gathering apparatus from the shadowy people that track our lives, than anything else.

That of course may or may not prove to be true, but the damage it has already done is not precisely containable. Considering the likelihood that CIA related activities on Facebook have tried to tip the 2016 election to Hillary Cilnton, contrary to the “Russia-Russia” disinformation campaign — the damage is already measured and banked.

The fact that they failed to “seat” the Queen of Crime and Corruption and appoint her as the next President of the United States is the fact that there are still bugs and bizarre quirks within the Facebook dystopia, whose sheer perversity and magnitude would have likely driven old George Orwell to suicide when confronted with evidence of the Facebook’s and CIA’s evil schemings…

It’s all Big and it serves the Big Brother willingly and profitably since the CIA was the earliest big investor in Facebook. Nothing much has changed since then. TO be a stole is the biggest job of Mark Zuckerberg and that he shines the boots of the faceless bureaucrats of the secret machinery of the state, is his call to fame.

Now I think you would agree with me that we need to have a reasonable discussion about the power of “surveillance socialism” and the quest by the deep state and the companies subservient to the CIA et al, and to all other Security apparatus machinery, to predict, control, and modify our behavior — at will.

We are so fvckin predictable like the necktop-computers, the current humans I described in my book “Brain Software” who with the addition of the right type of software — are gonna jump as high, as our handlers want us to jump…

So let talk about it, because we are on the throes of losing all of our liberties and even our free will now.

Let’s talk about it because talking about the secret powers, technosocialism, unethical mind control and corpo-socialist governance, theft of personal identity, theft of freedom, theft of personal agency, mind control resistance, fear of disassociation, need for urgent activism to stop that subversion of freedom, and much much more.

Surveillance Socialism is a human creation that can be reversed, because it is not written in stone somewhere, but resides in the annals of the CIA and the Police State and not in some kind of technological inevitability like the Minority Report of predictors of future crimes being kept in brine for their own good and thought crimes police running around gunning down the potentially future criminals.

Surveillance Socialism was pioneered and elaborated through trial and error at Google in much the same way that the Ford Motor Company discovered the new economics of mass production or General Motors discovered the logic of managerial capitalism.

Surveillance socialism was invented around 2001 as the solution to financial emergency in the teeth of the dotcom bust when the fledgling company faced the loss of investor confidence. As investor pressure mounted, Google’s leaders abandoned their declared antipathy toward advertising. Instead they decided to boost ad revenue by using their exclusive access to user data logs, once known as “data exhaust” in combination with their already substantial analytical capabilities and computational power, to generate predictions of user click-through rates, taken as a signal of an ad’s relevance.

Operationally this meant that Google would both repurpose its growing cache of behavioural data, now put to work as a behavioural data surplus, and develop methods to aggressively seek new sources of this surplus.

The company developed new methods of secret surplus capture that could uncover data that users intentionally opted to keep private, as well as to infer extensive personal information that users did not or would not provide. And this surplus would then be analysed for hidden meanings that could predict click-through behaviour. The surplus data became the basis for new predictions markets called targeted advertising.

Sheryl Sandberg played the role of Typhoid Mary, by bringing surveillance capitalism from Google to Facebook. Here was the origin of surveillance data socialism, now used in an unprecedented and lucrative way as behavioral surplus, data science, material infrastructure, computational power, algorithmic systems, and automated platforms. As click-through rates skyrocketed, advertising quickly became as important as search. Eventually it became the cornerstone of a new kind of commerce that depended upon online surveillance at a size that is only possible in a massive totalitarian police state scale.

The success of these new mechanisms only became visible when Google went public in 2004. That’s when it finally revealed that between 2001 and its 2004 IPO, revenues increased by 3,590%.

Surveillance Socialism started with military applications, and “face & action control” and evolved into command and control system for the police state, and then moved on to advertising, where it became far more generalized to the whole tenet of human life.

Surveillance Socialism is no more limited to surveillance, control and command operations, but it is used very profitably for advertising and mass production of capital value through data and algorithms. It quickly became the default model for capital accumulation in Silicon Valley, embraced by nearly every startup and app. And it was a Google executive – Sheryl Sandberg – who played the role of Typhoid Mary, bringing surveillance socialism tools from Google to Facebook, when she signed on as Mark Zuckerberg’s number two in 2008. By now surveillance socialism is no longer restricted to a few evil geniuses hellbent on taking over the world, nor to individual companies, or even to the internet sector. It has spread across a wide range of products, services, and economic sectors, including insurance, retail, healthcare, finance, entertainment, education, transportation, and more, birthing whole new ecosystems of suppliers, producers, customers, market-makers, and market players. Nearly every product or service that begins with the word “smart” or “personalized”, every internet-enabled device, every “digital assistant”, is simply a supply-chain interface for the unobstructed flow of behavioral data on its way to predicting our futures in a surveillance economy.

Whole countries like China and the United States are using this technology with face recognition and AI, in order to Surveillance and control their populations. Of course in true socialist fashion China has taken it to a new level with social credits for behavior and many other developments that even George Orwell could not have foreseen…

Yet, back in the 1930s when George Orwell was fighting in Spain on behalf of the Republican cause — the national socialists of Germany intervened to save their brethren, the Spanish fascists, and thus one fine day the German Luftwaffe pilots started raining thermite bombs on Guernica.

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.21.47 PM

Nobody, could have imagined that they were writing the first pages of a story that would echo across space and time to a digital 21st century, where the surveillance state burns up people on the stake as they “burn” their data, their reputations, and even all the traces of their existence, out of the pages of reality & history. The first surveillance socialists also conquered the digital commons, by dropping incendiary napalm bombs onto the unsuspecting populace in order to create their scorched earth policy. Then, they simply declared the landscape to be “tabula raja” and took the blank state of our private experience, as their social commons, free for the taking, for translation into data for their private ownership, and for use as their proprietary knowledge.

They relied on misdirection and in fake aspirational talk like their famous dictum, “Do No Evil” and by deploying rhetorical camouflage, with secret declarations that we did not know anything about, and therefore, could neither understand, and obviously not to be able to contest.

Google began by unilaterally declaring that the world wide web was its to take for its search engine. Surveillance capitalism originated in a second declaration that claimed our private experience for its revenues that flow from telling and selling our fortunes to other businesses. In both cases, it took without asking. The Google founders, Larry and Sergey, foresaw that surplus operations would move beyond the online milieu to the real world, where data on human experience would be free for the taking. As it turns out his vision perfectly reflected the history of socialism, marked by taking away things that live outside the market sphere and declaring them collective commons and free for the use and the taking, or for their new use as surveillance tools and the massive commoditization of our lives.

We were caught off guard by surveillance socialism because there was no way that we could have imagined its actions, nor its far reaching repercussions, any more than the people of Spain and the internationals could have foreseen the rivers of blood that would flow from their struggle against the national Socialists of Hitler that came over to their country to test their weaponry and their methods before the advancement of the Second World War. Who amongst the people of Guernica would have thought of the napalm thermite bombs dropping from Stukas planes of Luftwaffee appearing out of thin air dripping death and destruction through the fiery melting of people’s bodies consumed by inextinguishable flames…

Like the Republican Spanish people, in the 1930s, we face a vastly superior enemy machine and an assault on our freedom that is something truly unprecedented.

Once we searched Google, but now Google searches us and share all their results with the government’s security and police state apparatus.

Is that what you want?

Screen Shot 2019-02-15 at 12.11.15 PM

Once we thought of the democratizing internet, and all of it’s many digital services, along with it’s nifty applications, as “free, but now surveillance socialists think of us — humans — as free food and as fodder for their behavior modification and persuasion cannons, in this war for the enslavement of the human spirit forever.

Imagine a boot stepping on a human scull forever, and now please recognize that the human skull under the jackboot is your own.

Maybe that will wake you up…

Yet for me the overarching question is this one:

What are our expectations of sovereignty over our own life?

And what are we willing to accept as the minimum invasion of our privacy for the provisioning of services?

And lastly this one too: Do we just accept the theory that the social network medium, the platform, the internet, the CIA, and her sister agencies, and all other mind controllers out there, “decide” and know best what is good for us?

And once that is the reality, do we accept it as simpletons, necktop computers, and mental machines – sheeple ready to head to the slaughterhouse as Adolf Hitler and his propaganda-control-extermination machine, and his minions ordered us, and then herded us onto the gas chambers, so many years ago?

And as the new mental masters modulate people’s behavior through the introduction of fake news that divides the people of this country and causes the particular kind of corrosive anger to all citizens, so much so that perhaps this time it might lead into the deep divisions that are usually followed by bloody conflict that leads to a new civil war.

And this new fangled civil war is what we have to fight against with all of our might before the devotions take root and before conflict becomes the only alternative for this country as well.

We’ve seen how this intersectionality destroys one country after another, and we need to urgently avoid becoming the playground of the “Gods of War” as all of our enemies wish us to become, in order to implode and self-destruct. And unfortunately, same as some of our ro-called “friends” want to “assist” us in becoming as they trigger & goad us on … to the brink of death.

To all those dark forces around us that use Psychops, propaganda and the Corpo-Socialist Surveillance & population behavioral modification systems, in order to divide us — I have only this to say:

Do you remember what happened to the Jews?

They were the other ones who got stiffed in the game of identity politics that Hitler instituted, and somehow, in a space of a short few years — they all ended-up in the gas chambers of the Anti-Semitic German devils and their evil industrial extermination machine of a whole People of human beings and of all the other undesirable and different ones…

So here is an open letter to all the evil men and women who seek to divide us and renew the horrors of the past:


You’ve been uncovered.

And now you’ve been marked for destruction.

Seems that whatever Coup D’Etat you were planning to unleash against our Republic in order to cover up your serious criminal misdeeds — has now completely failed.

The Civil War you want to start as the back-up plan is now also in the process of being revealed.

And a note to the wise: You have been uncovered and there are no more covert dirty psychops available to you, because your minions in the leadership of Facebook, Twitter,  Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc have thrown in the towel and admitted their criminality…  Indeed your comrade Jeff Bezos of Amazon, and WaPo, with his creepy stupidity, of his recently revealed habit to be sending unwanted dick-pics to unsuspecting women, is just another example of how low these easily manipulated fools have fallen.

As for you … well … you are already toast — and you know it. What you don’t know yet, is when your fall from grace will stop, or where are you going to land.

The thing is that with defenders like myself and my comrades — no matter what happens, this House will stand.

We are the pillars upon which this great edifice of “E Pluribus Unum” stands, and we offer a solemn vow that we shall not forget the seeds of hate that you are sowing amongst us.

All behavior modification public tools must and will be banned.

All political propaganda tools of fake news and mass media, must, and will be controlled.

Controlling, persistent, following you, coersive & emotionally triggering subliminal and sublime advertising, must and will be banned.

All private and public organizations holding our personal information must be regulated, and forced by law to stop abusing us, and return our information and data to the native owners.

Any kind of Surveillance Socialism Corporation, or persons, inducing Psych-ops that promote behavior modulation & modification, coupled with political division, should be treated as a criminal and charged with treason, because this high crime must not be tolerated in the midst of our open democracy. And the ones found guilty because they are practicing it — must pay the stiffest of prices, because this is a capital crime against our Republic.

Let us do this now, because we need to become the Controllers of our personal information if we are to protect ourselves from the agents of hate, division, and discord. And especially if we are to keep our United States — united.

As for my fellow citizens — I must remind them that divisions, intersectionality, and identity politics are

As our beloved 14th President Abraham Lincoln paraphrasing Mark 3:25 and Mathew 12:25, said:

“A house divided against itself, cannot stand.”

Old honest Abe knew something about Civil War to be sure…

he had come to be inaugurated when the civil war was already ten days old, and he took office in a city surrounded by Confederate forces.

Civil War is always that awfully dramatic nightmare that looms in the background of a loud & argumentative Democracy like ours, but it also is a far more incipient danger, when the evil doers are hidden deep within our mechanisms of state in our transparent democratic Constitutional Republic that allows the violent tears in the fabric of State to become black holes that when un-mended, shall become the permanent wounds full of the festering puss of hate and misery, that inevitably and inexorably, leads to armed conflict and bloodshed, amongst the members of our national family.

And that is the simple plan of the globalists that aim to weaken, destabilize, and destroy these United States — because we are the last beacon of Liberty and Human Free Will standing, and we are indeed standing in the way of their mickey-mouse plans of control and domination for the whole world.

So they use their considerable powers of ownership of all the news networks and the propaganda machines to make our young and the fragile amongst us, all hateful, miserable, and unwilling to live with each other in peace and harmony, simply because they have been brainwashed with Millenia Socialism, and cannot understand how come those of us who don’t choose to be chronic stoners by smoking the evil weed — happen to be able to have different and liberty promoting ideas…

Screen Shot 2019-02-16 at 3.59.44 PM

Add to that, the intensified Psych-ops of the CIA and the various other Secret Police State agencies, like the broken FBI, that were infiltrated and led by the Socialist Surveillance society bosses, and we can easily end up fighting against each other in barricades that turn our cities into battlefields, like the muddy valleys of the 1860s that were filled with all the human carnage of rotting corpses of our youth. A youth simply divided by the color of the threads that made the cloth of their uniform and not anything else. And now they all subsequently lay wasted in the mud of the same color of the earth that received their rivers of blood. Blood of a youth — killed off to appease the Evil Gods of Slavery and Human subjugation that the Democrats of that time wanted to embrace for ever more…

Human carnage at a massive scale is what civil war is, and a wasted generation sacrificed in the altar of a faulty & divisive ideology, simply because the Democratic party of the 1860s wanted to maintain the institution of Human Slavery, in the same way as they still want to maintain the institution of Mental Slavery today in the year of the Lord 2019…

And they are willing to use all the means at their disposal to divide our society into it’s constituent colors, creeds, and national origins, while they constantly apply the psychological tools that trigger the most fragile parts of our Society and the most suggestible (young pot smokers) to bring them up to a hateful froth, and to prepare them to stand ready in war-footing, as they are assembling the other storm troopers, the ANTIFA thugs, the paramilitary wings of the permanently offended, permanently dissatisfied, and the permanently broken classes of depressed and deluded along with the pink-pussy-hat wearing fem-nazis, in squads and brigades intent on murder, violence, and mayhem.

Just remember the Kristal-nacht that led to the gas chambers of the concentration camps the anti-Semites had erected to burn all the enemies of the NAZI German state, because they all started out as simple identity politics and intersectionality social justice national socialist warriors in the brown shirts Antifa groups of their day…

I have personal experience of the hate these Antifa goon squads carry deep within, from when I was attacked inside the Microsoft headquarters while giving a simple speech, on the afternoon of the 28th of February of 2017, in building 28 (The Garage), in Redmond WA, and although they broke my head in an obvious assassination attempt, by the grace of God, I survived. But the attack still caused a massive head trauma, of which I am presently still recovering…

So now, I must remind my fellow citizens, especially the innocent, the females, and the young who are mentally fragile, and thus easily triggered, and all those others who might be aligned with the Democratic party of today and espouse political violence — about this awful truth that they have forgotten as they go down the road beating the battle drums of hate and division within our House:

Identity politics is perhaps the most pernicious and backwards policy of the 21st century, because our Constitution in all of its wisdom and glory — a couple of centuries earlier ended this practice along with the practice of estimating a person’s value by his or her color, creed, tongue, accent, parentage, or even ancestral land of origin. In this land we are all one: E PLURIBUS UNUM.

Lincoln’s emancipation proclamation of 1863, attempted to FINALLY end the SLAVERY and therefore the determination of a persons’ worth and life, simply based on the color of their skin.

Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation provided the legal framework for the emancipation of all four million slaves living incarcerated under bondage of slavery, throughout the American Southern & Democratic party ruled States. And it was for those states that the Emancipation took effect. And as the Union armies advanced, they also  committed the Union to ending slavery forever, ending the divisions amongst men, and ending all subjugation of man upon man from then on and into eternity — something which was a controversial decision even in the Northern states.

Hearing of the advent of the Emancipation Proclamation, more slaves quickly escaped to the Union army lines donning the cloth of righteousness, and wishing to fight for their freedom, as the Union Army units moved into the Southern plantation country. And as the Union armies advanced through the Confederacy, many more thousands of slaves were freed each day, until nearly all (approximately 3.9 million, according to the 1860 Census) were freed by July 1865.

“All Men Are Created Equal” is the preamble to our founding document, and that is why the American Civil War was fought.

Because of that simple fact, we are also not allowed today to be Anti-Semitic, as some fresh Democratic party representatives clearly are today, nor are we allowed to be anti-human being against anyone else today. And that is why we are not allowed to divide human beings into sections, identities, nor anything else, subdividing our brethren into easily controlled and conquered minority groups. We are not allowed to do that because Abraham Lincoln followed up his Emancipation Proclamation, with the 13th amendment to the US Constitution, that forever entrenched this act of Human Kindness, and Divine Justice, within our founding document.

The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude for ever. The Thirteenth Amendment applies to the actions of private citizens, while the Fourteenth and FifteenthAmendments apply only to state actors. The Thirteenth Amendment is far reaching  intelligent legislation because it covers all aspect of slavery and thus enables the United States Congress to pass laws against sex trafficking, involuntary servitude, child labor, mental slavery, and other modern forms of slavery…

Indeed a great achievement for humanity from the soon thereafter “spilled brain” of Abraham Lincoln.

This is the New World’s Magna Carta: The humble 13th amendment to the constitution of the United States, adorned by all of its glory and all of its amendments, topped by the 13th. This indeed remains today as the crowning achievement of our global civilization.

Yet, identity politics today, along with their evil twin “intersectionality” not only lead to diversity delusions, but they also lead to unalloyed hateful division in our society and YES … they lead to a perilous kind of mental slavery that threatens to upend this very principle upon which we rest: Our beloved Constitution.

Sadly it is the so called “progressives” of today’s Democratic party, who want to “return” us all, to this antebellum, destructive and antidemocratic past. A past that the Southern  Democratic party espoused the barbaric system of slavery from centuries past, and where no amount of brains, brawn, or intellectual and personal merit,  would have allowed a man to rise up in Society, due to his color, or religion, and differing ideas, to the prevailing Status Quo. So if today’s intersectionality, and identity politics, prevents people from rising up to their rightful place in society — we must admit that Slavery is alive and well in our midst.

Well, what did you expect from the leftist Alinsky type of Democrat party crazies?

That’s what you get from the shrill voices promoting intersectionality, identity politics and societal divisionality:

Please keep this in mind because it matters greatly:

Division leads to Conflict & inexorably, Conflict leads to Civil War.

This has always been true; as the sequence of events in any nation’s history, right up to the full blown Civil Wars that ended the Roman empire and all the empires before it — have undoubtedly proven.

Yet, I agree that for some people … (very few people) … war is very profitable.

Profitable but never pretty.

For you and me, and for our children — war is not going to be neither profitable, nor fun.


As for Civil War …

Now that is another kind of ugliness.

It is pure unadulterated EVIL.

And the thing is that in the Civil War both sides lose because they are part of the same side to begin with. The children of the same nation turn their bayonets against each other and they end up cannibalizing their own flesh…

Imagine a beast eating up it’s own flesh … red of tooth and claw … and then eating up it’s own children. Yes, some species eat up their own young. Like humans engaged in the evilness of the civil war.

That is what Civil War looks like and if you’ve been to the Civil War museum, to the Arlington cemetery, or to the you’ll understand.

And then you might also comprehend that Civil War is an all together different thing, that I do not wish upon our worst enemies. Believe me. You cannot even handle seeing it … let alone living and dying under it.

Because, if you think the degradations of war are awful — you haven’t yet seen the ignominy and the raw awfulness and artlessness of Civil War.

Civil war is so ugly that one has to avert their eyes, lest the images of the dead and savagely dismembered humans become indelibly imprinted in your head. These are the bloody visions that one can’t unsee, as I can personally vouch for this.

I’ve seen it in many places where I was always advocating Conflict Resolution and failed. I’ve seen it in spades and I’ve come to massively detest it. Because I’ve seen it in all the geographies of this earth and it’s always the same smell of evil deeds emanating form the disemboweled remains of human beings.

I’ve seen it in the Algerian Sahara, in Northern Ireland, in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in Yugoslavia, in South Sudan, and in Darfur, and more recently in Syria, and elsewhere…

I’ve seen it and that is why I am sworn to fight against that particular evil.

That is all I am fighting against when I run for the Presidency of this country.

That is the evil that I try to avert.

And indeed to regain the PEACE is a big battle in and of itself.

Indeed it is a giant battle, but one that we must absolutely win.

And as you know, I already know how to win battles…

So let me win this battle for Peace for you.

But in order to win this monumental battle — we should start humble. We should start by simply protecting our own personal data, from all those smart folks who want to “personalize” our newsfeed, our inducement feed, and our actual mental feed.

We must absolutely protect our genetic, our psychological, and our political data, because that makes you far less susceptible to the evil “voices in your head” placed there by CIA and all the other socialist spooks, who control the propaganda machines to fit their needs.

By keeping that data private — you are far less likely top be targeted successfully, and you remain far less “triggered” by the tunes of unseen pied pipers, that follow you everywhere reinforcing messages of hate and discord. Because once the spooks got a hold of you — they use all the script readers masquerading as journalists at the public channels of fake news and misinformation like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc to keep reinforcing the message. And they all lie to you, from Amazon’s Alexa, to the other asexual automaton Rachel Maddow of MSNBC, in order to trigger within you, and reproduced with million others — the behavioral responses they want to bring into a massive societal effect magnified with each meme that you keep seeing in your confirmation bias tunnel that reinforces their views as installed into you.

You’ve got to know the sinister uses and effects of “Brain Software” in order to fully understand this effect upon human beings’ minds, but if you want to read the book, here it is:

And this is how you get triggered, and start crying in the middle of the day, because “THEY” made you do it. Alexa and MSNBC, and all other mass media, are controlled by the same spook-chiefs who control the behavioral modification social network platforms of Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, Google, etc, and who are all interconnected in this pyramid of socialist surveillance corporate hot mess, we have unwittingly gotten ourselves into.

But we can start cleaning up our act now. We should start humbly, by reclaiming our agency, by controlling our personal data,  by shielding our psychological, genetic, nerve-action-propensity info, triggering behavioral data, and suggestibility inducement data – in the same way that HIPPA requirements protect and shield our medical & genetic data, our DNA information, our illnesses, and our bio-markers and beyond, from prying eyes high and low.

That is why the founders had decided from the get-go, that our Privacy is SACROSANCT.

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.24.22 PM

And even though some of us willingly surrender our DNA data to untrustworthy corporate socialist surveillance companies under the guise of finding our  long lost and distant historical ancestors — the intelligent ones amongst us recognize the grave vulnerability this practice creates for ourselves, and by extension for the whole of our society, and refrain from sending our DNA recognition kit to the Mormon church, to, to, and to all other unscrupulous gatherers of this type of sensitive and hugely identifying personal data that makes each person vulnerable to becoming the next “Manchurian Candidate” in whatever field of life and position you work, live and exist as a free and unfettered human being — because it can turn you easily into a remote controlled SLAVE.

No wonder the Democratic party supports all of these Socialist Surveillance cornucopia of Mind Control and Behavior Modulation and Modification.

It was a psych-ops experiment to see how this system works, but by witnessing the women’s parades and marches with hundreds of thousands of ordinary females (& some undecided) somehow all “finding” pink pussy hats, all at the same time, and all wearing these awful looking and admittedly ridiculous headgear strutting themselves on public avenues and the streets of America — I admit that the behavior modulation & modification technology works like a charm for the intended purposes and the triggered masses who’s reminds have been all but taken by the dark and sinister manipulators of the dark art of Mental Slavery…

What a pity … because it is always the weaker of the species (females, homosexuals, children, stoners, etc) that are easily prone to triggering mechanisms, mental slavery, and even full scale remote control manipulation…

And what a bloody shame, to see all these millions of ordinarily innocent and fragile people, becoming automatons of hate. People who are not even being aware that they are manipulated into doing stuff that they would ordinarily not do…

Indeed the lesson here is that we have to protect the weaker members of our society from the ravages of the Psych-Ops mental Slavery machines, by uncovering this matters.

So as President of the Lincoln party and as Candidate for the Presidency of the United States — I aim to reverse all those illiberal trends of coercion and control of the people of this great country, and to protect all of our personal and privileged data along with all of our medical records to the same extent as our medical records should be protected.

And we shall accomplish all this, quite easily in fact, through the help of already existing & trusted private and public third parties, privacy advocates, individual human rights organizations, and all others who will hold our information in trust, so that private and public service providers can only use that information if they are to provide us with their useful wanted services, but cannot use it to spread discord and division to create conflict amongst us…

So together we should offer a resounding “NO” to the Surveillance & Control Socialism Police State propagated by the vast machinery of the CIA and other butthurt agencies of doom, and from the seemingly runaway AI of the Surveillance Socialist Networks, their Psychops operations & effects companies, and from the propaganda News networks, along with the telecommunications behemoths.

So, dude,

Give me back my FREE WILL and everything will be OK again.

Or else, all hell is gonna break loose.



Dr Churchill


Of course our data, our lives under the microscope and the time and lives of everyone around us are offered willingly, and that ugly mirror of reality becomes the company’s only currency.

And that currency is what it offers to the secret spooks and all others at a heady discount to the cost of human intelligence gathering apparatus. You are being constantly and voluntarily surveilled my friends – simple as that.

We need to become the Controllers of our personal information with the help of trusted private and public third parties, who will hold our information private, sacred, and sacrosanct, much like our medical records are being held safe under HIPPA regulations, so that private and public health service providers can use that information to provide us with their services.

No other source should be able to use our data for evil machinations. Certainly not the intel fools like Zuckerberg of Facebook, and Bezos of Amazon — people with the morals of gnats, with the social graces of a subterranean worm, coupled with the social skills of the black rhino. These are fools and indelicate people who can only excel at sending dick picks to hapless and largely disinterested people, and who treat others as they would treat themselves — with disdain and fear, so they collect all the data they can scoop up in order to control them.

So now you know why Amazon’s Alexa collects all the words uttered in your home even when you think it  is not listening…

Mass Surveillance my friends. That what is all about. You have invited the CIA and all other spooks to manhandle you inside your own home.

Please go back and reread the book 1984 to get a refresher course on human liberty’s awful death at the hands of the socialist project handlers.

And please don’t blame the Russians.

Because it is your own CIA that does the surveillance within the domestic borders of this country and it is the self same people who hoard your personal and private data, and that is a major crime, since they are (CIA) supposedly not allowed to conduct domestic operations.

And they bring you all manner of BS to distract you. Including the popular stories of collusion, because they have co-opted the news organizations and they all provide you with a version of reality that will surely keep you occupied following the bouncy castle boobies of Stormy Daniels, and Donald Trump’s pvssy talk, instead of the destruction of our Republic at the hands of the socialist network minders.

Read the book 1984 and connect the dots of why the Russia collusion story today is the screen behind with all manner of dirty tricks are hidden from your overextended vision, and overburdened mind… that the whole industrial complex of misinformation through the fake news ministry of propaganda keeps churning out by the ton.

The whole Russia-Russia bullshit is the fake game that spreads disinformation against the imaginary “enemy” so that the self revealing idiots, get to further reveal themselves while being fed shit and kept in the dark, like all good mushroom farms do to grow their ‘shroums.

Of course Facebook outside of its massive surveillance for the “Police Socialist State” usefulness — is just another game. And as an attention gathering game, we all clearly know that without our continued attention, contributions, and voluntary surrender of the most basic human intelligence — they’ve got nada.

Facebook quite literally has nothing, and it’s an absolute bubble, once you distance yourself from it and regain your depth of field perspective…

Indeed it is all a house of mirrored cards, that allow us to look at ourselves and at our anomalies, but now it still serves well, as a self interrogation chamber and as a digital mini Zuck-CIA-evil empire, that surveils all of us and takes aways our basic Constitutional freedoms.

Is this still the land of the FREE & the BRAVE that it says on the marquee?

Or is it some giant Police state that we are prisoners of?

Let’s reflect upon this position and find our rushers again and maybe we can turn the lights out on this evil empire.

If you want a revolutionary as a President — you can well choose me, yet I can advise you ahead of time, that you do not need me to turn the evil off and wake up from this nightmare of Orwellian proportions.

You simply have to be strong and walk away from it.

Indeed that would be all the heroism required from you.

Walk away and leave all that FB platform crap behind.

And if enough of us do just that — we can wake up from this collective nightmare now.

Go ahead and shut down your profile and boycott this surveillance platform and you’ll be better for it. Of course the benefits will accrue for all of us, after the pangs of withdrawal and the pains of isolation can be soothed, from this proven neurological addiction.

Let’s all boycott Facebook and let’s see the evil empire crumble because it is just an empire of the mind and nothing more and it could all be brought down with a single exhale of letting go of your profile, and deleting the damn thing…

Let’s free up ourselves because being human, means that we are free to choose…

Yet we ought to use this freedom to “CHOOSE” wisely the course of our Republic.

Screen Shot 2019-02-16 at 1.35.30 PM

We are living in an age of information and this surveillance and behavioral control technology is maturing. Therefore, we need to reorganize our way of living, our laws, our organizational schemes, in order to benefit from this, and not to be enslaved by it. We need to retake control of our selfdom. Our own sovereignty. SELFDOM is key here. And if we want to remain private — we can do that. Whereas if want to make our personal information public, sharing, and open — we must be able to do that too, and enjoy our lives whithout losing control.

We are endowed with Free Will, in order to be able to follow our individual destiny.

But living under Surveillance Socialism means we are no longer free humans. Instead, we are enslaved manageable and manipulated computerized “objects” tamed of all freedom, and treated worse than all of the animals imprisoned in the zoological gardens known as City Zoos.

What’s next?

AI robots ruling over us.

Sadly, we are all sleep waking towards this sad future.

But methinks, that we don’t have to live inside 1984 any longer.

We can rebel and revolt to regain our freedom and it’s just as easy as asking for it.

Let’s go get it.

Happy Valentine’s to you all and may Freedom ring, with Love for all.


Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 5.11.46 PM

Last night I dreamed that I had visited Moscow and her republics again, back in the day when they were all hiding behind the Iron Curtain that contained the socialist sea of imprisoned souls…

It was a fvckin nightmare.

All grey and black, hugely oppressive, with stone faced people, wandering about, bereft of hope, love, or happiness.

This project of the failed Society Union got started by romantic and optimistic youthful idealists that sought to have a revolution and throw out the old and replace it with a new version of Russia that was based on dialectic materialism, AKA socialism.

We all know now how this project ended pear shaped and full of bloody memories of debauchery and corruption that costed the lives of many millions of innocent people, mostly proletarians, plebeians, peasants, kulaks, and of course the whole of the Czar’s royal family and aristocracy, along with all the old leadership of the Russian people who might have had other ideas in their heads, that did not include socialism as the panacea for all the ills of this world.

First thing the socialists did in the old Russian empire, as soon as they got control of Power — was to suspend Democracy, and replace it with the romantically called tyranny named “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” The rest simply followed the path of this evil. And although many millions of Russian people were executed — many more millions of them died an ignoble death of famine, starvations, and fear, resulting from the “beautiful” plans of socialist bureaucrats and government planners that called for the collectivization of agriculture and industrial production.

The free markets were shut down and any incentive for people to produce was stifled…

Soon all food reserves were consumed, stolen, wasted or simply spent. Widespread famines followed. Starvation was then the daily routine…

That was the Green Deal of the Soviet Socialists and it was a disaster.

We have a name for this now: Death By Agriculture.”

Yet some people undeterred by seventy years of dismal failures of socialism in the old Soviet Union — they want to try it again here in the West now, and it seems that they are winning, because socialism is a hot topic again today…

Incredibly, they call it actually the “New Green Deal” here in the United States in the year of the Lord 2019…

And the whole lot of the Democratic party is supporting this New Green Deal for America today.

And they go even further because according to a recent Gallop poll we find that up to 47% of young Democratic party Americans today, would support a socialist candidate for president.

Imagine that…

Never mind their warm homes, their fancy clothes, their plentiful food, their frappuccinos & lattes, their rich schools, their I-phones, their weed, and their fancy hybrid automobiles…

And indeed this Democratic party movement of mass delusion, and suspense of disbelief, seems to be particularly enticing to our young people, because all young people like the promise of government provided free stuff … so much so, that a November 2017 YouGov poll disclosed that a majority of Americans aged 21-29 prefer socialism to capitalism.

Brainwashing anybody?

And thus these wonderful youngsters of the Democratic party, go even further east towards communism, because after the consistent brainwashing in their leftist holding baby-pens in colleges and universities — they seem to truly believe that capitalism works against them. They have been conditioned to hate themselves, their families, their country, and their origins, even though they enjoy all the good & great things capitalism offers to Americans in a way that none other enjoys around the world.

After countless hours of conversations with young Democrats of the Bernie Sanders & Nancy Pelosi varieties — I gathered that most of the young Americans who support socialism, don’t have the foggiest idea about what Socialists even pretend to stand for, what they truly stand for, or what bloody ravages against humanity Socialists have wrought upon the backs of human beings.

So I felt like I had to explain things a little here for the young ones, because who doesn’t like the seemingly “free stuff” and all the romantic notions of “Equality, Brotherhood, & Freedom from want” ? We all do. But the intelligent ones amongst us ask the follow up questions, All that is good, but to what end?

Surely we all like freebies, especially if the other guys are paying for it.

But we don’t want that, especially when we are Christians and we know that the “others” are our own countrymen that pay for our “Free Bullshit” with their own lives.

Because that is what happened during Socialism in the old Soviet Union. And I saw that with my own eyes, when I visited there as an educational exchange. The high standing party members and government types, had access to the best supermarkets in the world stuffed with caviar and champagne, and to the best department stores like GYM, similarly stuffed with the best clothes around — whereas the ordinary people were dressed in hand me down rags and galoshes for shoes, and had to wait for hours at the particular food stores to get an egg or a half loaf of bread, or a pound of potatoes, that is only if they got through the line early enough before the stores run our of the meager few provisions they had on the shelves.

Imagine Venezuela today, but on a really cold climate zone with Siberian winters.

And that, my friends, is the essence of socialism.

Everything belongs to everybody, and we are supposed to share and share alike. Let’s say that you are an agriculturalist, a peasant farmer, or an industrial worker; and you work hard and produce plenty of foodstuff, or any other kind of industrial output, but you should not keep more than you really can immediately consume, and you should give everything else up to the state for redistribution to others.

The same thing goes for your money. The same goes for your other needs, You share everything, until all of the people run out of everything, and then only the widespread misery is the only thing that is left to share, amongst the prisoners of a giant gulag…

Screen Shot 2018-11-04 at 8.07.52 AM

So if you are smart, ambitious, and hard working, and you happen to live in a Socialist paradise — then you are royally and totally screwed, because in socialism individuals don’t own property, and everything is owned by the collective. The group, the party, and the government own and control all the aspects of your lives, including the means of production, along with the means of the distribution of goods and services, and virtually everything else worth having. All “thought” is controlled, “speech” is strictly forbidden, and you are surrounded by stoolies, snitches and informants. Even your children will report you to the hated secret police, if you dare mouth anything against the State. Your very life is worth whatever the state says it is, and death panels choose whether you deserve to live or die.

If this socialism is akin to communism — it is because it truly is the same thing.

So now, you better think twice about how well things have worked out for the socialists  in the former Soviet Union, especially for all those people living inside the “Worker’s Paradise” who were getting shot & killed as they were jumping over the border walls, in order to escape this much vaunted “paradise” and their Socialist freedom utopia.

People getting killed because they desired to leave the land of the Socialist philosophy must be a clarion call and an alarm to wake our young people up from their nightmare masquerading as a dream of sweet delights.

Yet, the current crop of Democratic candidates for President proves that the doctrine of socialism is strong in the popular culture, and perhaps this is the ultimate measure of success for this solid state ownership of everything economic and political malarkey. Because whatever you, as an individual, may have attained, is attributable not to your hard work, intelligence, ingenuity, and determination, but to the government and the system. As you might remember President Obama’s proclamation that “you didn’t build that” was a textbook inspiration for the Alinsky socialists in this land, and yet no hackles were raised by the globalists of the media and the Democrat party.

Because under socialism, in essence, the “haves’ pay for, and support the “have nots” until nobody has anything of value left to consume.

Markets don’t work that way.

And paradoxically, despite ample evidence that socialism has never been successful in any country — its popularity is spreading, even to the US, because of the lure of “freebies” and the fake gospel of intersectionality that breeds unique divisions and discomfort for the masses of dissatisfied and permanently outraged silly cry-babes out there.

The roots of socialism, with its basic tenant of common ownership of property, can be traced all the way back to ancient Greece and the philosophers Plato and Aristotle. Socialism in America can trace its lineage to the early 19th century and utopian experiments, such as the New Harmony, the Shakers, Brook Farm and the Oneida Community, among others.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries the movement was influenced by the philosophy of such as Karl Marx, Lenin and Trotsky, with the Soviet Union being the biggest socialism/communism experiment, followed by Red China’s years of famines under Mao Ze Dung (sic). And as those of you, who follow history might already know — eventually, its economy imploded and the Soviet crashed and burned in it’s descent into chaos and anarchy, from which it was saved by the evil Western capitalists.

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.26.29 PM

More recently, socialism has failed in Cuba, Nicaragua, Zimbabwe, Bolivia, Brazil, Venezuela, and other exotic travel destinations amongst those banana republics. Thankfully, it has not aged well there, or anywhere else either. Because as we have seen time and again, inevitably a system that relies on common ownership and government controls while stifling free enterprise and individual incentives, is doomed to failure.

And the people wake up to that reality only after there is nothing left to eat and everybody goes hungry.

And in the long term, inevitably the government runs out of money to pay for all the services it provides, so it keeps printing money and that leads to runaway inflation — look at Venezuela & Zimbabwe — and then to complete collapse.

Because the basic tenet of socialism, the claim of share and share alike, is bogus, since in socialist countries a very small elite class always develops, which garners the lion’s share of resources, and the vast majority of the people are plagued by severe shortages of food and other necessities. For example, the food shortages in Venezuela are so acute that some 80% of the people claim they are unable to afford sufficient food to sustain themselves. Those who have been to Russia or the other satellite countries of the old Soviet Union during the time of Socialism, must recall the desperate living conditions of the non-privileged, especially those residing outside the areas normally seen by the visiting tourists, like Bernie Sanders and his bride that saw the Bolshoi ballets and got naked for the inevitable never-ending-round of Vodka toasts and communist singing merry making amongst hairy men and even hairier women.

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.25.10 PM

Yet today, socialism has received a make-over as some people point to the Nordic countries of Norway, Sweden and Denmark as socialist success stories. Yet that is misleading and premature.

First, their open border policies have resulted in a flood of immigrants, which inevitably place a severe, and possibly fatal burden on their social and economic structures, so much so that they will potentially bankrupt their governments.

Second, given the high volume of immigrants relative to the size of the native population of these countries there is a real concern that their traditional cultural and social identities will be drastically altered. Not for the better.

There is ample evidence that this is already occurring, especially in Sweden, which is being plagued by increases in violent crimes, such as murder, rape and anti-Semitism. Thirdly, they spend very little on the military. Norway maintains armed forces of about 25,000; Sweden maintains around 20,000, including reserves; and Denmark only 5,000 when fully mobilized. They rely on the US and NATO for their country’s defense.

Obviously, the US’s military needs are considerably greater and more expensive.

Furthermore, most of Western Europe has been turning increasingly Eurosocialist, in varying degrees, and with varying results. It is safe to assume that all of them have turned out bad.

Those who have been following the news in Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy, France, Germany, and the UK in recent years, are cognizant of this. The empirical evidence of the negative impact of socialism and open borders in these countries is plain to see for anyone who cares to look.

This should be very instructive to Americans as well, because the Democratic Party has been moving further to the left toward outright socialism, communism, and even open borders — under the guise of “Progress” and “Humanity” in all of it’s extensions.

Bernie Sanders, who admits to being a Socialist, almost won the Democratic nomination in 2016, and probably would have been the nominee, if the “fix” had not been in the caboose, placed there by Hillary and the corrupt DNC that deprived him of his chance to get smacked down by the Donald…

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.24.39 PM

So, please do not be fooled by the term, “progressive” because in this case it is a misnomer, since a more acceptable description of the Democrats’ brand of socialism today would have been the simply and honestly stated, “American Communism”.

Additionally, one needs to remember, that the evils perpetrated by Socialists upon this world, are only rivaled by the death toll brought forth because of the Islamic ideology and the plague.

Now, in retrospect, with each of those terminal ideologies being responsible for hundreds of millions of dead people — all killed in the sort of political violence that has not been seen outside of world wars, massive genocides, and the bubonic plague — the black death that decimated whole peoples and erased them from the face of this earth — it is time we woke up and smelled the corpses.

That’s socialism for you, and I suspect that if these well meaning folks had seen the track record of the past couple of hundred years of Socialism, or what it would mean for their own country — they would not have wished that travesty upon America and her children.

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 5.11.46 PM

Willful blindness is also a big part of this trend besides the brainwashing, because, it has been my experience that the young ones, don’t want to know, and they don’t want to be educated about socialism, because they enjoy their ignorance in all it’s perplexing form & variety.

Now, if you think these people are a radical fringe outside the mainstream of the Democratic Party, think again. Democratic party leaders who support these ideas include Senators Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, & Kamala Harris, amongst others who have lined up to be considered as candidates for the office of the United States president.

Moreover, many of these people have expressed the same political programs as other socialist leaning Democratic party leaders that include the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, and Maxine Waters.

So, not only has the Democrat Party been moving sharply to the east, towards socialism and even communism, but many of its leaders have been advocating for social and political divisions, calling for incivility, and advocating extreme political violence, that will surely lead to civil war, through the constant violent attacks against those who disagree with them.

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.24.22 PM

Glaring example of this inequity, is representative Maxine Waters who has been advocating political violence whenever one sees any Conservatives, and she has asked all Democrats to confront with violence any other ideologues, and certainly all Trump supporters, and government employees — wherever one finds them.

Imagine that divisive vitriol coming from none other than a demagogue government employee herself…

Mad-Max-ine is indeed a sad douchebag, because at her command, people have been intimidated, accosted, and then attacked inside public halls, inside fast food joints, in other white cloth restaurants, in movie theaters, and even at a Congressional softball game where a full blown assassination attempt against elected representatives took place, when a Bernie Sanders Antifa shooter, started hailing bullets against the Republican reps playing the Congressional tournament there early in the morning.

And indeed Antifa thugs have routinely attacked speakers, political leaders, MAGA hat wearers, and peaceful demonstrators at college speeches, at regular political events, public rallies, and even at random gatherings in support of simple, moderate, or conservative ideas.

To me, this is not just a sign of insanity, but it is also a clear sign of things to come that are far too excessive and dangerous, because this environment is downright dangerous, as it presages the days of the widespread unleashing of fascism, bloodshed, and insurrection against all of our Uniquely American ideals.

Keep in mind that already one US Congressman has been shot in front of the eyes of his young children, and he is alive today, by the grace of God.

How many more shootings of political leaders, would it take in order to get us to understand that these cultivated divisions will lead inevitably to widespread & bloody political conflict, that is akin to a new civil war?

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.21.27 PM

In politics, discord leads to disconnect and thus Political DIVISION always LEADS TO military style CONFLICT.

It has always been thus.

That is how CIVIL WARS are made.

Political divisions always become open conflict.

Demagoguery and sharp calls for political violence, always lead to military.

And this can only be avoided by “conflict” giving way to reconciliation, under the right circumstances. Thank God these circumstances still abound today, but are quickly getting scarce.

And as the flames of discord are being fanned by the Antifa Democrats, by the Socialists, by the Clinton mafia, and by our Chinese enemies that seek to destroy America from within — we should fan the flames of Love, instead of hate — lest the warring tribes get what’s coming to them.

But never mind the foreign enemies. Let us concentrate on the domestic ones. Because the destabilization of this country will start form within, and that is the Chinese plan to overcome America: Destabilize the country from within, and cause divisions and political violence that will lead to massive bloodshed with will eventually follow, just as soon as someone gets killed.

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 10.30.33 PM

It is apparently easy for someone who is minding their own business, to be killed in a random act of political violence over a stupid red hat or some MAGA shirt, or what have you — and then the civil war will erupt anew. And of course, I understand that some people are happy with that, because they are presently butt-hurt that their little darling wicked Queen is not the President.

So since they are unhappy with the direction of this country — they don’t want to wait for the American way to seek change through discourse, and argumentative democracy, where the polls, are the deciding factor, but they want to engage in the breaking down of our Republic through random political demonization, intersectionality, divisions, name-calling, and wanton political violence against all others.

I know this first hand.

Because I’ve experienced this political violence myself, and because I have bled for this country.

And it is with great disdain that I have to speak to my own attackers — the Antifa fascist thugs, who busted my head with a wooden bat inside MICROSOFT, around two years ago, when I showed up to give a speech in the headquarters of the Evil Empire…

It should have been apparent to me that the socialist new-left no longer seems open to dialogue or debate, but simply wants to grab power by violence. So if you have any other ideas, or if you disagree with them, or even if you are relatable but unconvinced — you are branded as evil and racist, a misogynist, or a white supremasist. And indeed the “Nazi” label has been used so routinely that it does a real disservice to those who were murdered in the Holocaust by real Nazis.

In my view, the fact that moderate Democratic party leaders, such as Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are responsible for this political violence, because they have not spoken out as voices of reason and restraint. And that loud silence is in and of itself, most disconcerting.

Why do they fail to speak?

Is it because they truly support these extreme ideas, or is it perhaps that they are afraid of hurting their political standing?

Or maybe a little of both?

Yet methinks that now is the time for real leaders to stand up, guys. Most of the media has chosen to ignore or downplay the aforementioned developments. Consequently, many voters are unaware of what is happening and the consequences.

Screen Shot 2019-02-11 at 9.18.12 PM

If the debilitating mental illness of Socialism is left unchecked, we could easily follow down the path of Russia, Venezuela, and North Korea…

And although ignorant and illiterate about political systems — these young and old fools alike, have a loud voice and a built-in propensity for intolerance, unkindness, and for wanton political violence.

Dangerous as the Socialist’s political violence might be, in our free society the fools who want to destroy us, also happen to be great demagogues and speedy social media barons, so that they enlist most other young people to their chummy romantic fantasies, whom they use, along with their votes, when it becomes useful for them to destroy our society, by electing evil & stupid representatives who will bring about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” that will surely take away, not just their own liberty, but also ours, along with all of our values, principles, freedoms, markets, capital, our food, and our democracy — but also our very lives and certainly our right to vote.

Because in socialism — peoples’ lives and their votes count for nothing … and that is ultimately what I want to avert from this country’s future…

Let’s bring back sanity and democratic argumentative discourse, in order to avoid the evils of political violence.

Because we have always known that in Politics as in Real Life…

Screen Shot 2019-02-12 at 11.20.12 AM


Dr Churchill


In conclusion,

In the 2020 presidential contest – myself and the Lincoln party, simply aim to be the central pivot around which the extremism of the two main parties will dissipate like waves reaching the shore.

After all the common ire and deep hate of the duopoly of the two party tyrannical system against a centrist pivotal liberal & democratic force that will keep the extremes of the two warring sides (Republicans V Democrats) from lighting the fuse that will blow-up the powder keg of discontent and division in our country, is God’s work.

We need to understand that political violence is not an end on itself. And as I was hurt by the Antifa thugs, and was sent to the hospital with blunt head trauma that made me a paralytic — I now recall the words of Robert Kennedy who just a couple of months before his own assassination had this to say when he spoke to the people in Indianapolis upon hearing that Martin Luther King had been killed: ” We can move in that direction as a country, in greater polarization – black people amongst blacks, and white amongst whites, filled with hatred toward one another. Or we can make an effort, as Martin Luther King did, to understand and to comprehend, and replace that violence, that stain of bloodshed that has spread across our land, with an effort to understand, compassion and love.”

“For those of you who are black and are tempted to fill-be filled with hatred and mistrust of the injustice of such an act, against all white people, I would only say that I can also feel in my own heart the same kind of feeling. I had a member of my family killed, but he was killed by a white man.”

“But we have to make an effort in the United States, we have to make an effort to understand, to get beyond and go beyond these rather difficult times.”

“My favorite poem, my favorite poet was Aeschylus. He once wrote: “Even in our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, until, in our own de-despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.”

“What we need in the United States is not division; what we need in the United States is not hatred; what we need in the United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black.”


And today it befalls upon me and the Lincoln party to be the firefighters that seek to put out the fire of discord and the dissolve the blinding smoke of discontent, before it devolves into open warfare and running bloodshed, that will be remembered in history as another all consuming conflagration known the world over as the Second American Civil War.

The Lincoln party, much like it’s namesake Abraham Lincoln, seeks to keep the United States of America – UNITED, because what we need in the United States today is not division; what we need in the United States is not hatred; what we need in the United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, and feelings of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black, or brown, whether they are Democrats or whether they are Republicans ir Independents…

And it is to that end, that I dedicate my life going forward.

To paraphrase the ancient poet — I run for office not just for Love of Country, but because we need to defeat the divisions and knit back together the tears that are sown in the fabric of our Unity.

To that I will defeat the civil war mongers, because I seek to unite us once more by helping our Republic heal the wounds of hate and division, and thus tame the instincts for political violence savagery of our fellow men, because I hope that I can make gentle the life of this country…

And I run for the same principles that RFK expressed herewith, when he himself was running for the highest office.

You can hear him say it himself, here bellow…

Older Posts »


%d bloggers like this: