Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 25, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 17)

“Churchill and Orwell”

According to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and bestselling author Thomas Ricks who presented a dual biography of Winston Churchill and George Orwell focusing on the pivotal years from the mid-1930s through the 1940s, when these two men combated the threat of fascism and communism, each in his own imitable way — Churchill learned and followed Orwell’s critical thinking and Orwell followed Churchill’s strong line of defense for Democracy, Freedom, and Liberty.

Thomas Ricks’ new book “Churchill and Orwell” can be described as a superb account of two men who set standards for defending liberal democracy that still remains disturbingly out of reach even in our advanced Democratic Republic of these United States today, judging by how easy it is to subvert our Constitution to the whimsy of political expediency from the evils of small minded people operating within both the Democratic party and the Republic party always salivating for naked raw power and  nothing else…

Of course George Orwell and Winston Churchill, worked from very different positions in terms of of authority.

Yet while they used their different pulpits in rather public ways — Thomas Ricks argues that the two men worked in tandem to support democratic principles. And thus he recalls the rather lonely position that both men occupied, walking a fine line between a country that appeared all but torn in two, by the divisive politics of the pre-war years between the pacifist labour socialist powers and the nn-interventionist and pacifistic Tories, in London’s Parliament — both of whom had intrigued and conspired to sent Churchill into “exile in the wilderness” in order to shut down his voice that was stirring the few people who actually “saw” the gathering storm clouds of global nihilistic wars, as the existential threat they represented for Great Britain and for the whole of the Free World.










A Cry for Guernica.

George Orwell had fought with the Republicans against the fascists and was seriously injured in the Spanish civil war. And this first showing of the Nazi war machine in action outside the borders of Germany well before the Second World War, is also the event that strengthened Churchill’s intellectual position through his writings, and his speeches during the pivotal and lonely pre-war years. This was the tonic for Winston Churchill’s ideas, when he was feverishly working in political “exile” during the “wilderness years” before he was called to lead the fight of the Free Nations against National Socialism, during the Second World War. George Orwell had provided the best accounts of that conflict that opened up the eyes of the World to the horror of the German national socialists and their allies. Picasso came to commemorate that event with the Guernica painting that reminded all of us what the Germans had in store for London and for other great cities that were defiant of the Nazi Germany and her Air force full of Stuka bombers indiscriminately bombing all civilian targets. Yet it was during the ten years before the war, that Churchill and Orwell, had both fallen seriously out of favor – because both men had been strong anti-socialists, expressing themselves daily against this seemingly cuddling form of evil ideology that was very much in vogue during those pre-war days.

Yet because both men had seen the horrors of this nauseatingly sweet Socialist method of usurpation of power, when the Socialists are winning the minds and the hearts of well meaning folks and when they are enlisting people — and how evil they swiftly turned when they had the power to govern and were started using these people in appallingly totalitarian ways, destroying the individual in favor of the masses, fighting that the mass of ants is not humanity.

Churchill and Orwell both spoke in this clear cut way against the Socialist doctrine, and this was considered bad form in a Society that had espoused the very modern Socialist ideology, hook-line-and-sinker, especially amongst the young people in very much the same way as what happens in Europe and the United States today.

Today Thomas Ricks makes the claim that, without ever working directly together, these two titanic figures, and essential authors, and leaders of men — worked tirelessly in keeping the West’s compass pointing True North, towards freedom and liberty.

As an example this is what Winston Churchill had to say about Russia and the Nuclear Bomb in 1945, after Winston Churchill had just marshaled the most improbable turnaround victory in history, since the Athenian Victory of the Second Persian War under the admiral Themistocles.

Because same as Winston Churchill had put all his faith in the Royal Navy — so had Themistocles who focused all his resources on building up the Athenian naval fleet, a couple of Millennia earlier. Themistocles understood the “Sea” and her Warfare, and utilized this knowledge ad his Fleet in cunning and masterful ways in order to draw the Persians in the geography that favored the decisive naval battle plan of Salamis. This was his strategy, and it worked so well, upon it’s application, that the Greeks completely annihilated the Persian fleet, and sent Xerxes scurrying and hurling pell-mell back east to despotic Asia, where he had come from, uninvited in the first place. That event taught good manners to all the following generations of Persian leaders who ever attempted a campaign against Greece or her Ionic cities in Asia Minor ever again.











In more recent times, Winston Churchill recognized that we are suffering again from another bout of “Eastern fever” where the Soviet Union and Communism was concerned and spoke often against their use of the seemingly cuddly socialist humanitarian ideals that serve as the usher to the complete totalitarian darkness of naked communism. And this is why he said that the threat of Russia and her black-hearted leader having access to Nuclear weapons would be catastrophic for the whole world.

And as we see now — he was prescient about that threat too. And he suggested to the Americans and all other world leaders who were with us after he had fashioned the North Atlantic Treaty with FDR that inaugurated NATO — that we had to band together and stop Russia from getting the Nuclear Technology and from acquiring nuclear weapons. He suggested that we ought to do this at any cost. Winston’s master plan for that included militating action. He was in favor of going as far as possible towards destroying  the Soviet nuclear program in it’s infancy. He was also willing to risk all out war n pursuing this goal into years, right after the socialist ideology driven US Atomic spies, Fuchs, Greenglass, and the Rosenbergs, among others, had given away the Los Alamos nuclear bomb secrets to the Soviet Union agents.

Churchill’s hawkish position has to be revisited again today, because it applies rather well to the fresh dilemma we face from the nuclear enhanced threat of a belligerent North Korea, that is speedily developing her own nuclear bobs albeit with ICBM capabilities against the United States.







According to the Churchill doctrine, we could either deny the enemy [North Korea] the further development of nuclear weapons technology today, or live in infamy for a little while, before we succumb & die under the circumstances of our inaction, that will surely bring war and infamy, along with nuclear bomb tipped ICBMs raining down from the sky, and falling upon our heads sending us all to the great hereafter. This is our rightful place  history and if we cannot deny the Pyonyang’s nuclear development and stem this existential threat from North Korean in it’s origin — then what good is our vast military capability and our song about the land of the Free and the home of the Brave, for?









We should heed Winston Churchill’s advise today because he was planning to take out the Soviet Union nukes well before they became the ‘Threat” and he wanted to accomplish this through acts of cunning, diplomatic subterfuge, and all out secret service sabotage. If that method failed to destroy the Soviet capabilities — he ad suggested direct aerial bombings, as acts of direct intervention for the destruction of all the nuclear development sites, of the old Soviet Union. Winston had already drafted battle plans, and war-time long distance bombing plans, in order to effect this attack with American help — but to his ever-lasting shock, he lost the general elections of 1945 and was booted from the office of Prime Minister thereby rendering all of his plans “inactive” if not completely mothballed.











Because it was then that the British voters rewarded the wartime Prime Minister with an eviction notice from the 10 Downing Street, cabinet and government office, and sent him home once more for some much needed garden leave, and painting rest, at his Chartwell home in the Kentish countryside. 

Imagine his fury for a moment, after thinking of how can it be that a nation turns ungrateful, by shafting her most winsome Prime Minister? There is no other parallel for this except the Hell-Hath-No-Fury-Like-A-Woman-Scorned…

Because indeed the most important man alive in the world; the famous Victor of World War Two, the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, was driven out of office immediately after the war. All his plans for containing Nuclear weapons were dashed as he was ousted, and the liberal socialists took over the Number 10 cabinet government positions. Winston Churchill of course became deeply saddened, when he heard the election result news, and he later had this to say: “The shock of defeat was accompanied by a sharp stab of almost physical pain amid the realization that the sacred knowledge and experience I had gathered, the authority and goodwill I had gained in so many countries, would vanish with me out of Office.”

And above all else he meant the war time efforts at containment of the Nuclear Weapons Technology to the powers of Good and not to be shared by the powers of Evil… This was the most important plan that was dashed from Winston Churchill’s exit from the Prime Minister’s office, right after the War. This bit of unfinished business always ganged away at this because it was such an important element of World Peace…

Churchill could have absorbed the sting of defeat and gone for home rest, knowing that his place in history would finally be secure. He could have retired honorably to his beloved Chartwell to paint and write and dabble. Yet this was not his nature. Anyone who knew him, understood rather well, that Winston Churchill chose to soldier on, and continue the “Good Fight” same as he always had. He served as leader of the political opposition in Parliament, dealing with the contentious issues of a new age, and by defining the incoming “Cold War” as he had done in Athens Greece, when he was under siege and assassination attempts by the Communists, and now at the Westminster College of the University of Fulton Missouri, speaking to a Free World that was again facing a siege by the very same Communist forces of evil and pathogenic destruction.

Churchill had prepared his Cold War and the “Iron Curtain” speech quite well: “From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an Iron Curtain has descended across the continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia, all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the Soviet sphere of influence.”  He spoke eloquently having honed his ideas over the space of a couple of years, since Athens, and he delivered his everlasting message about the “Iron Curtain” descending upon Europe at the time Berlin was being divided, and the weary wartime alliance was being torn asunder. But he also gave a note of optimism, by founding the idea for the need of a “summit” between leaders, to be the Security Council of the United Nations, and he also spoke in favor of a United Europe, all aligned with Reason for Peace, in order to counteract the totalitarian regimes who are causing constant war, bloody mayhem, and much too much human suffering, by sowing the seeds of strife across the planet. 

Always prophetic, always vigilant, and often explicit as a futurist, Winston Churchill was not just the guardian of Liberty, but he was also the first thinker  to grasp the potential of the nuclear deterrence, and delineate a doctrine of DETENTE, for it’s application in both the short and the long term… against by now a far stronger and nuclear enhanced enemy, represented by the Soviet Union of Marshal Stalin. 

The time for denying him the Nuclear Weapons capacity had passed unused like so many grains of sand flowing down the hourglass. A decision to m=not take a decision had resulted in that worst of all decisions that we now had to face a very different enemy than the one we we’re facing before…

To think that Winston Churchill did all this thinking, speaking, agitating, and politicking, while writing his masterpiece multivolume and gigantic book, “The Second World War” is a fantastic effort in an of itself, yet these two things were intertwined… And to consider that he had all of this work cut out for him, while attending Parliament as leader of the opposition, all the while writing and advocating the Nuclear Deterrent Policy that s still in effect today.

Winston accomplished all of this through his prodigious fits and starts of stupendous energy. He worked all the time and made telephone calls and sent telex and telegrams to all corners of the Earth and at all times of day and night. He called everywhere, where he had Leaders who were war time intimate friends of his, and who were still in positions of power and authority. He called them all and advocated through courageous words, his vision of the post war era. He had his own foreign policy and he maintained it during these times of troubles. He worked during the English late evening hours, and in the dead of nigh,t at his 3am “busy business time” and even during the break of dawn — all in order to take advantage of the differences in time zones, with the other World Capitals.

All of that in a giant effort, where he tried to get the world leaders into his mind’s harem for the cause of his “Empire of the Mind” that he saw as required, in order to counter the threat of the communist menace that he equated with worldwide nuclear annihilation. Often he doubled this “Empire work” and his unrestful international travels with incognito summits where he managed to meet privately with these other leaders who saw the World as he saw it. And he did this under cover and secretly, while ostensibly he was on “painting holidays” and sightseeing trips. In reality this is where he held his secret Summits with these Leaders in far of places like Marrakech, and the High Atlas mountains, or in Lake Como, and in the south of France, or in Madeira, and in Venice, or in Athens, and in Thermopylae, or in the Greek isles, and particularly in Crete and in Ithaca, near Scorpio. And he always relied and utilized his strong and fast friends, like Aristotle Onassis the most wealthy person on Earth at this time, and one of the most powerful men in the world — to ferry him around in his private airplanes, or in his stylish yacht, full of old world charm. It was in this massive yacht, where Winston held some of his own powerful yet private “Summits” with powerful men, and where he entertained all of them as he regaled them with stories of War and Peace, always with a meaning that was to convey the message of what we need to do going forward. Winston and his friend Aristotle Onassis often times sailed on towards Onassis’ private island “Scorpio” in western Greece, near Ithaca, where some years later Aristotle Onassis even married his own version of Penelope, in his “Ithaca” the island named ‘Scorpio.”












It is important to note that Jackie [Jacklyn Kennedy] and Ari [Aristotle Onassis] had started out as simple friends, and it wasn’t until several years after the assassination of her first husband President John F. Kennedy, that their courtship actually began. Aristotle Onassis, a powerful Greek shipping mogul, was living part time in New York as he was the wealthiest man in the world of his day, and Jackie Kennedy an American icon — and thus “met” on numeraous public and private occasions in Manhattan and beyond, o all the fashionable circles of holidays and wealthy people’s enclaves. But their first meeting only happened because Winston Churchill asked Onassis to introduce him to the young Senator from Massachussets John Fitzgerald Kennedy.









And that’s how Aristotle Onassis came to meet Kennedy’s wife Jackie, for the first time. All that in order to accommodate a request from Winston Churchill to meet the rising star of American Politics, her husband… and at long last it meant the tow of them would become good friends and even marry each other. Not bad for the last hurrah of the bespoke matrimonial dating & wedding services of old Winston who never missed an opportunity to connect people…











Yes, this little island Scorpio, nestled in the middle of nowhere, is not only where Winston Churchill had some of his most interesting “Summits” during the last part of his life, but it is also where Onassis married the wife of the slain President John Fitzgerald Kennedy — Jaclyn Bouvier Kennedy, in a strictly private ceremony. Jackie and Aristotle Onassis, who were 23 years apart in age on their wedding day, married in a simple fashion with an intimate, happy Greek Orthodox ceremony on October 20, 1968. The Kennedy children, Caroline, and John Junior, participated in the ceremony by holding the candles that were traditionally held by Greek pages during a marriage, and Jackie’s sister was the only matron of honor, attending along with a few dozen friends. And that’s how Jaclyn Kennedy became Jackie O.








Still with the help of this powerful and well traveled modern Ulysses-Onassis-Shipping-Sailor-man, and his many friends, Winston continued his good works, and his Foreign policy to save the whole of the Free World.

Onassis a firm adherent to the tents of Freedom, Liberty and unfettered Capitalism found common cause with Winston Churchill who in his advanced age saw his work being undermined by the Socialist ideologues and their communist brethren advancing everywhere.

The two men shared many secrets, least of which was their anti-Soviet intrigues…












Naturally this attracted the attention of the Soviet spies, and the Russians who already hated Onassis for hosting Winston Churchill’s Liberty Summits, at Scorpio and aboard the yacht, they became inimical and enraged and sought revenge for some unfounded excuses. That they unleashed the fury of the KGB against Onassis  is well documented as is the fact that KGB sabotaged his airplane, and thus had Onassis’ only son murdered in a staged airplane crash where the saboteurs had reversed the wire controls so that Alexander Onassis plane crashed upon takeoff, and he died from the resulting blunt head trauma. This was the sabotaged airplane Onassis’ son was piloting, and that fateful morning — never quite took off but instead nose dived into the tarmac.

Onassis mourned bitterly but soon with Churchill’s help the relationship continued even after Winston was returned to Office as prime minister in the 1951 general election. And even though Winston Churchill’s work was sometimes interrupted by arterial spasms, and moments when “everything went misty,” and outright strokes that left him tired, debilitated, spent, and bedridden for days, forcing him to spend hours upon hours, practicing his handwriting — he persisted in voyaging and traveling. Because it was then that Winston Churchill would throw himself back into his regimen — back to writing in bed, in the bath, in his medieval study, and wherever he could, with rivers of ink and Scotch to sweep him along. In the famous Onassis long yacht “Christina” Winston Churchill, in white Panama hat and cruising suit, went aboard for eight official cruises between 1958 and 1965, and for several undocumented and incognito voyages, for reasons of Winston Churchill’s Summits at Sea or multilateral and some serious bilateral discussions…

These voyages were a huge help for the recuperation of Winston’s health and he always credited the sea, the salt, and good company, with restoring his to a mighty new state of being…












The Aristotle Onassis Yacht Christina.

This was the boat that in 1968 Onassis married President Kennedy’s widow, Jackie, on board, close to his private island of Scorpio: the ultimate trophy wife on the ultimate trophy ship.

This ship had seen it’s share of troubles as a warship and later when she retired she earned another keep on life as the caviar and champagne palace of Onassis and his guests, ranging from Kings, and Princes, to potentates and heads of States, along with some lesser mortals like Monaco’s Prince Rainier and his film star wife Grace Kelly who were favoured guests, as were at earlier times John F Kennedy and his wife, alongside Winston Churchill, and at other times, Marilyn Monroe and JFK, or Frank Sinatra and Greta Garbo, Liza Minnelli, Eva Peron, John Wayne, Rudolf Nureyev, and a fistful of Rothschilds, and Rockefellers, who had all swept down the onyx and silver staircase, or had swam in a marble pool that at the touch of a button rose to become a dance floor and could sit at a bar – Ari’s Bar – on stools upholstered with the foreskin of minke whales’ penises. Aboard there was a veritable Art gallery because Onassis had a collection of Impressionists, along with Renoir, Chirico, Goya, and other art that Onassis enjoyed letting his guests view and admire. These years were indeed the post-austerity Fifties and opulence and greed were back in fashion. There had been nothing like it since the Great Gatsby and the roaring twenties… Surely every big boat owner, puffed out with the romance of the sea and his rightful place upon it, likes to think he has created a legend. But Aristotle Onassis, the Greek shipping magnate, was the only one who truly did this to it’s rightful maximum. The opulent Christina, a decommissioned warship that he bought and spent many million USD towards converting it to his floating palace, became a floating “Xanadu” to some of the most important figures of the 20th century.











Egypt’s dethroned King Farouk, who had a great yacht himself, called the Onassis yacht “the last word in opulence” and a real ship of war and love.

For Aristotle Onassis, the Christina was a palace of seduction, a place to broker deals, a celebrity honey trap and the most conspicuous symbol of his successful shipping empire. On a visit with Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton acknowledged in one sentence both the generosity of his host and his blatant self-indulgence. “I don’t think there is a man or woman on earth,” he said, “who would not be seduced by the pure narcissism shamelessly flaunted on this boat.” This modern day Aristotle, Ari Onassis, who would occasionally deploy his wolfish charm on famous women like Tina Livanos, or Maria Callas, same as he did with Jacqueline Kennedy — had entertained scores of other conquered women aboard this yacht, and thus he saw no “edge” in Richard Barton’s remark. His only reply was: “I have found that to be so.”













Winston Churchill, in white Panama hat and cruising suit, went aboard the Onassis yacht for eight official cruises between 1958 and 1965, and for many other unofficial and undocumented “Summits At Sea” where he pursued his own Foreign Policy in meetings with powerful friends and heads of State.

With a mind shaped by Victorian habits of speech and thought, Winston Churchill stated the theme of his final volume, Triumph and Tragedy, as Macaulay might have done: “How the Great Democracies Triumphed, And So Were Able to Resume The Follies Which Had So Nearly Cost Them Their Life…”

Because in the early years of the Cold War, Winston Churchill worried that the great democracies were once again tempting fate with an inadequate response to a threat from the East. During the blockade of Berlin in 1948 and 1949, when the United States and Britain were beginning to organize the airlift to supply the beleaguered city, Winston Churchill wrote, “I trust we are not approaching another ‘Munich.’”











Those worries intensified after the Soviet Union negated the U.S. unilateral nuclear advantage by detonating its own bomb in August 1949. On the conventional side, Europe had an imbalance of power. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, NATO was a paper vision with little manpower and hardware. Ninety percent of the almost three million U.S. soldiers and 300,000 airmen in Europe had returned home.


















By 1950, the Soviets fielded at least 175 divisions, 25 or more of which were armored, against a dozen American and Western European divisions, only two of which were armored. To make matters worse, the outbreak of the Korean War in June 1950 turned America’s attention to the Far East, prompting Winston Churchill to worry that Britain’s ally and protector would be too distracted to defend Europe.









By the late 1940s, Russia loomed almost as large in Winston Churchill’s mind as Nazi Germany had a decade before. He privately worried that the West Germans were too intimidated by the Soviet Union to rearm, and that even France with the socialists in power, might soon become a Soviet satellite.
















As leader of the opposition, Winston Churchill told Parliament that Soviet strength had steadily emerged “as a rock shows more and more above an ebbing tide.” Russians “in one form or another” controlled half of Europe and China, but showed “no signs of being in any way satiated or satisfied.” For the first time in a decade, there were whispered fears in Parliament and Whitehall that Britain could once again face the prospect of an invasion from the East.










As for Winston Churchill seeing the Future, we have his own observations for that, because in the midst of the Soviet menace, Winston Churchill offered advice to his colleagues that would be ridiculed as sophomoric if made by a U.S. politician today: he suggested that his colleagues try to see the world as the Russians saw it. The point was not to infer fairness in Soviet policies, but to understand the nature of the threat. “There is no doubt that trying to put oneself in the position of the other party to see how things look to him is one way, and perhaps the best way, of being able to feel and peer dimly into the unknowable future,” Winston Churchill said.













The Soviet Union then, much like Putin’s Russia today, wanted to divide Europe and keep it divided. Winston Churchill vocally campaigned for a “United Europe,” a conceptual precursor to the European Union. “I am not attracted to a Western bloc as a final solution,” he wrote in 1946. “The ideal should be EUROPE.” He would have embraced the Western doctrine set out by President George H. W. Bush of a “Europe whole and free,” with the addendum — recently underscored by General Philip M. Breedlove, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander — “and at peace.”

Despite his emergence in the Victorian era, Winston Churchill understood clearly that the concept of “spheres of influence” belonged to a bygone era. Although that paradigm has long been discredited in the West, today, it is very much alive in Moscow. Winston Churchill would understand that fear is behind Russia’s aggressiveness in seeking to establish a sphere of docile states around its perimeter. A fear of NATO may be irrational — attaching nineteenth-century worries about “encirclement” to a twenty-first-century institution of joint defense between democracies that would rather focus on social welfare spending — but to Vlad Putin, to Mr Xi, and to members of their assorted coteries, that fear is palpable. We need to understand this: Winston Churchill might tell us, not to empathize with the Putin and the Xi regimes, but to understand why their regimes appears so volatile and dangerous.

Winston Churchill would not see today’s Russia as a weak nation with a strong bite, and that is what makes the difference. All those University professors and the military advisors that see Russia as weak — are deluded. Even the US military minds, and strategists that tends to forest Russia’s stronghold in the Far East, in the Eastern and Central Europe, and in many other parts of the world, fail us because they delude themselves. Russia is a strong nation and that should never be underestimated, because of the more fashionable view of China as being our Chief Antagonist. 


















Yet, let us think now of what would Winston Churchill make of Vladimir Putin…

Is Volodya a good guy or a bad guy?

That undoubtedly, would have been his first question in his attempts at Socratic dialogue, in order to understand Putin’s psychology.

Would he detect the psychological flaws and see that Putin harbors a paranoid brew of resentments and fears, just as Winston had an instinctive understanding of Hitler’s dark psyche? Or would Winston conclude that Putin is probably steeped in the propaganda of his own media, which sees anti-Russian “fascists” in the orange-wearing democrats of Kiev and regularly posts horror stories about Ukrainian atrocities that seldom occurred, much like the Mass Media of the US today, constantly attack President Trump through fake and dishonest news, in order to destabilize our Republic…

Then, who is really working for the Russians today within the US?

Could you please tell me?

Methinks you’ve figured it out already.

That would be the Democrats and their store bought establishment Mass Media with their snowflake reporters spewing their socialist gospel of dishonest fake news. This is the true Russian propaganda making machine that seeks to weaken and divide our Republic for their own benefit. Putin has been playing yo all — all along, and yo were thinking Donald Trump never realizing that the objective of a misinformation campaign is just that. To misinform and misdirect, and obfuscate…

This is the point.

Look at outcome and you find the TRUTH.

The establishment mass media of the United States today, like the CNN and WAPO and all other minions like MSNBC and all are the same enemies that tear apart our Republic n division and discontent and are thus working overtime of our enemies the North Koreans, the Chinese, and the Russians, and there has to be a money line connecting them to our sworn enemies. 
















The Coneheads News Network CNN otherwise known as the Clinton News Network always has a certain bend, so it’s up to us to figure it out…

Winston Churchill who was very deliberate in how we needed to counter the Soviets, would no doubt see enough reason for caution in approaching the Putin regime today, but he would also see plenty of potential for fooling them and playing “appropriate music” so they can get up and dance to his tune, and thus work to his advantage by playing up to their Russian gloomy depressive paranoia for destruction, and their subservient need for recognition.

He already knew the weakness of the Russian psyche because Churchill was already in power when Joseph Stalin made his disastrous gamble on Hitler’s trustworthiness — with the Ribbentrop/Molotov pact to divide Poland, and thus he knew how easy it is to fool a Dictator surrounded by Yes-men who drinks his own Cool-Aid.

Yet he also knew how dangerous it is to play with a cornered dog, because during the early Cold War détente years there were many near disasters that came close to mutually assured annihilation, and were only averted at the very last moment.

As for us, we already know that many nuclear exchange, accidents were stopped at the very last minute, during the Gorbachev, and even during the Boris Yeltsin years, when the Soviet Union and its Russian successor came close to launching a first strike against the United States because of the disarray of their intelligence apparatus in events like when a critical set of sensors were “spooked” by a flare of sunlight, and when a Norwegian weather rocket, triggered a total alarm... Incompetence, Vodka, Irrelevance, and systemic failures were also behind Russia’s apparent decision to allow rebel forces in Ukraine to handle surface-to-air missiles in corridors where passenger jets routinely operate is the most recent example of Russian recklessness. The Dutch holiday makers who became the victims of this terrorist attack from a terrestrial missile launched from Donetsk that brought down their plane in a muddy field, would readily attest to that, if any of them were alive today. 














But your Mass Media does not give you the Truth, and as a matter of fact all of you seem to enjoy wasting your Life watching football and all other sports, so why should they even care to give you a glimpse of reality?  So they don’t. And you stay in the dark… eating the sit they provide you. Much like mushrooms you grow puffy and blind. Not suitable for Freedom but a rather good fit for the tools of Oligarchy and Totalitarianism. In short the Mass Media is turning all of you into useful tools. And to become a tool, you have to start out as a fool — but I bet you knew that already…

















So Churchill would undoubtedly have to take into account Russia’s ongoing record of extraordinary belligerence, callousness, and strategic miscalculation, before he urged us o a road to battle. Of course Winston Churchill was outspoken about his darkest fears about nuclear weapons, calling them “that awful agency of destruction.”

But the question remains, what do we ought to do?

Churchill asked Parliament in 1955, during his last great speech. “Which way shall we turn to save our lives and ensure the safety of the future of the world?”

He continued: “It does not matter so much to old people; they are going soon anyway; but I find it poignant to look at youth in all its activity and ardour and, most of all, to watch little children playing their merry games, and wonder what would lie before them if God wearied of mankind.”

But there was a catch. At some point of nuclear development, Winston Churchill recognized, “the worst things get the better,” because “safety will be the sturdy child of terror, and survival the twin brother of annihilation.”

Long before Ronald Reagan, Winston Churchill adopted the Roman emperor Hadrian’s maxim — “peace through strength” — as his policy. Winston Churchill set out the means to strengthen the West in the face of the Soviet challenge, which included transforming NATO from a paper institution into a real military force and devising a British nuclear deterrent.

But in 1950, at the height of the Cold War, Winston Churchill also added some nuance to his view on appeasement:

“Appeasement in itself may be good or bad according to the circumstances. Appeasement from weakness and fear is alike futile and fatal. Appeasement from strength is magnanimous and noble and might be the surest and perhaps the only path to world peace.

“When nations or individuals get strong they are often truculent and bullying, but when they are weak they become better mannered. But this is the reverse of what is healthy and wise. I have always been astonished, having seen the end of these two wars, how difficult it is to make people understand the Roman wisdom, ‘Spare the conquered and confront the proud.’ … The modern practice has too often been ‘punish the defeated and grovel to the strong.’”












Churchill would see today’s Russia as a weak nation with a strong bite. It has a brittle economy, but maintains the ability to wage a devastating war in eastern Europe — and a reckless willingness to test the will of NATO with tactical nuclear weapons. What would Winston Churchill do?

One essential component of appeasement is the deliberate degradation of military capability in an effort to convince an enemy of one’s good intentions. By these lights, Winston Churchill would see the Obama administration’s public interest in unilaterally reducing the U.S. strategic arsenal by one-third below the plateau reached with Russia in the New START agreement as appeasement.

Churchill would certainly urge the United States, Britain, and France to modernize and maintain their nuclear deterrent. He would also urge Western leaders to bolster NATO’s conventional forces, and to devise an effective counter to Russia’s tactical nuclear threat. He would applaud recent measures to reinforce NATO’s defense of the Baltic republics and Poland, and urge the removal of any uncertainty from the commitment to treaty allies. He might take his pen to paper and doodle useful ideas on how to use crowd-control techniques or technology to stop Putin’s “little green men” if they emerge on Baltic soil. He might caution Putin that deeper moves toward Kiev could will result in lethal aid to Ukraine and a widening of the conflagration to Caucasus and Chechnya and to all the various “Stans” that Russia barely holds onto…












I believe that at this stage, fully arming the Ukrainians to fight a conventional war against Russia, could be a profoundly un-Churchillian application of Winston Churchill’s thinking, because Winston Churchill would urge us not to legitimize Ukraine’s forcibly changed borders, but to work quietly in order to reverse the situation through all means available – save for outright war. And perhaps just as he welcomed governments-in-exile to operate in London during the Second World War, so too he would likely advise the United States, and the European Union today, to welcome Ukrainian luminaries, leaders, and refugees, and to highlight the suffering of all of the Ukrainian people, refugees, and victims, all the while working to undermine Russia’s annexation of the Crimea, through subtle and yet painful means.

From the First World War to the Cold War, one constant of Winston Churchill’s strategic thinking was to identify an enemy’s hidden pressure points or his “soft underbelly,” whether in the Dardanelles, Italy, or the Balkans. In World War II, Winston Churchill was eager to arm partisans and to find ways to disrupt the enemy from the rear or within his own lines. The lessons from the Winston Churchill of the first and second world wars would argue for sending at least limited military aide to the Ukrainians.

A different lesson, however, could be taken from Cold War Churchill. In that contest, Winston Churchill was much more cautious – not because he had grown soft with age, but because of his carefulness in dealing with a nuclear-armed state. Churchill, no matter how deep his sympathy for the besieged Ukrainians, might not be so eager to jump into the fray as his self-professed admirers like senators McCain, Cruz, or Graham, or, for that matter, his current Tory successors, David Cameron and Theresa May, and on the Foreign Affairs desk, my friend Boris Johnson.

Today, Winston Churchill, no doubt would have dismissed President Hollande’s assertion that “a lasting peace agreement” is possible, just as he dismissed Chamberlain’s promise of “peace in our time.” Putin is all but certain to continue to test Western resolve for as long as he is in power. But Winston Churchill might have rejected the contention that any agreement guaranteeing Ukrainian neutrality would amount to appeasement. He would have understood that to actively get into the conflict – even in the proxy form of providing “defensive” military aid to Ukraine – would be to get into the business of killing Russians. Again at this stage, arming the Ukrainians and starting the Third World War before it’s time — would be a profound misapplication of the vaunted Strategic and yet tactical Churchillian thinking.












On engaging the Russian People during the Cold War, Winston Churchill preached a stoic optimism equal to the long task of countering and containing Moscow’s designs. He said of the Russian people that the “machinery of propaganda may pack their minds with falsehood and deny them truth for many generations of time. But the soul of man thus held in trance, or frozen in a long night, can be awakened by a spark coming from God knows where, and in a moment the whole structure of lies and oppression is on trial for its life.”

The power of social media is the true “soft underbelly” of this regime. Putin himself revealed his own fear of Internet, of Social Media, and Social Networks like Facebook and Twitter, when he signed new laws requiring social networks to store data on Russian users in servers domiciled in Russia, subjecting them to censorship. The public murder of Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov has opened the minds of young Russia, giving the West an opportunity to make the most of the small cracks and the existing crevices in Putin’s vast firewalls of Information censorship.

Yet for the West, the best strategy is a policy of openness, transparency, patience, firmness, and determination – if we are to undermine the Putin regime and frustrate its forays, until the day when the whole structure of its lies and oppression are put on trial by the Liberty seeking young Russians to come… Same goes for the Chinese firewall and it’s legions of digital security personnel manning these Internet stopping ramparts. We have to be patient and little by little chip away at the wall until one day a strong leader will appear that will ask the Chinese to bring down that wall, and his call will reverberate to the other side and the freedom loving Chinese people will listen and respond with a thunderous applause that will bring down crashing the soul snatching edifice of the Chinese Communist People’s party.

And meanwhile we should always remember Winston Winston Churchill’s final bit of advice as he prepared to leave office: “Meanwhile, never flinch, never weary, never despair.”

And today it is Donald Trump that carries the mantle of Churchillian Wisdom in Action, and the US President does exactly what Winston Churchill would have done himself, were he alive today and in charge…

Well Done Mr President.

War can wait …

A bit longer, still…

To be continued….

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 24, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 16)


Europe’s peaceable “German Reich” that the European Union represents today after the Exit of Great Britain, is terribly disturbed by the Arab terrorism, by the economic inequities, and also by the nationalist tensions that are arising from the German government’s “invitation” to millions of Islamic refugees streaming out of the Syria & Iraq conflict zones, failed states, and wars — and the daily bombings and acts of bloody mayhem all across Europe point out to the veritable stupidity of the open borders policy that has served as an open invitation to all the criminal elements of the Islamic militant religion.

Initially it appeared as a useful industrial labor policy tool, masked under a humanitarian veneer. Indeed this self serving German state idea of trying to keep the wages low and productivity high — came because Germany’s need for cheap labor to keep propelling her industries forward, has been steadily increasing since they have taken over Europe and unlike China, our German friends cannot just use an easy source of slaves like the Chinese do in Africa, because they have to keep up appearances of civilization…

Also the Germans today cannot find any Jews left in Europe in order to enslave them in worker concentration camps and then exterminate them, once their vital source has been weakened and therefore their usefulness has come to an end.

So the German leaders reckon to do the next best thing – and they chose to import refugees to use them as “human slaves” inside their factories. And by masking this as a humanitarian deed, they reckon to be able to get away with it and screw the people while the world is still sleeping. Yet methinks that they reckon dead wrong, because today is 2017, and Europe is not quite the heart of darkness that the African continent is, nor is Europe today the same vast concentration camp the Nazis had turned her into after their conquest of the 1940’s.

Screen Shot 2017-05-11 at 12.18.28 AM

So this simple selfish act of the German deep state of the industrialists and of the Mittlestandts has indeed caused the human flood that this Exodus of Millions of Islamists towards Europe represents. So next time you hear the mouthpiece of the German Industrialists Angela Merkel, announcing that they would “accept” all the people who actually make it across the European borders and reach Germany — keep in mind that these people are the new slaves for the factories of Germany… and never going to become German citizens, but will be expelled back to the countries they came from.

Yet that uniquely devious German act of Aggression is what started the Refugee “Hunger Games” that we have seen infusing in front of our own eyes when a veritable river of humanity started leaving the Syrian and Iraqi refugee camps, in order to trek thousands of miles and even cross the open Aegean sea, with one goal in their mind: Reach Europe and Germany.

But still this German need for young virile labor is easily satisfied because the greatest number of displaced people who are streaming out of the deadly Syrian conflict. A conflict that can be seen playing between the militant Islamic terrorists supported by the Obama administration & the Clinton State Department policies on the one hand, and by the government of leftist leaning Assad supported by Russia, on the other. And the displaced refugees of this conflict are mainly the fighters who are young men of fighting age, and of good industrial working age, and that are already militant Islamic radicals, having played their part in the long lasting conflict. So these young men, who are now retreating to the German Industrial heartland to ostensibly work inside their factories, but in reality they cause disruptive trouble because they have come with their religion and with their ideals, and that indeed is what represents the huge security threat for the whole of Europe and America as well, since their Asiatic Koranic beliefs are fit for the cult of Death, Darkness, and Destruction, that their religion’s depressed prophet had espoused and they are still carrying forth.

SO when Syria started to blow-up as part of the CIA invasion in line with the Arab Spring and the Clinton doctrine of interference and regime change — it was promised to all that this would have been an easily won proxy war. Still, the conflict mushroomed, as it always happens — and the Clinton instigators of violence had not even thought of taking the simple precaution of isolating the extra dimension of Radical Islamic Terrorism reaching across the World in the form of an imaginary Caliphate that exists in 33 different countries already.

Thank You secretary Clinton. Thank You Barack. Thank you Democratic party of America. Thank you for this mess that we have inherited.

It’s a giant mess… but God bless your meddling souls and hope you get what’s rightfully coming to you from the little bitch named Lady Karma.

SO Fortune has not quite smiled upon us since that meddlesome duo of idiots has destroyed the whole of the NAME areas of North Africa and the Middle East. Yet now there is hope because there is a man now at the helm, of the US ship of State, that can solve this thing, through the incredible power of non intervention. He knows that when you are in a hole the first thing to do is to stop digging…

The Trump administration has just now cut off all support to the Jihadists of ISIS, and to all of their brethren, but the thing is that you can’t kill the snakes all at once , and you can’t get the idea of the Caliphate back in the bottle anymore than you can get the desert winds, or the terrorism “gini” bottled up either. And that terrible idea that has now been born anew, and the Era of the Gazis, and the Jihadists, has found new meaning amongst a new generation of adherents, who are all ready to sacrifice themselves to that evil cause. And they are doing it in Europe in places like Manchester where they are killing our 8 year old girls as if they were little throw away dolls…

So Europe is now dealing with terrorism head on, without even realizing that they have Ms Clinton and Ms Merkel to thank for that. And without having been prepared for it – they are now enjoying the continent wide benefits of terrorism as sacrificial virgins up in the altar of a vengeful desert God…

And in addition to that stream of refugees – the people of Ukraine are also streaming across Europe’s East in search of a safe haven away from the fighting that has engulfed the eastern Ukrainian regions and that of the Donetsk republic, and is threatening to intensify all over the old Soviet Union territories that today’s Russia wants to regain control of.

And yet all of a sudden that expansionism is now almost at a complete stop because of Trump calling Vlad and gaining a Gentleman’s agreement to stop the Russian incursions into the Ukrainian territory. That is tantamount to the best Cease Fire agreement, we can ever hope to receive.

“Bang” goes the agreement in and in one phone call we avoid Nuclear War.

Not something that you can share with the Media but really something to know and smile about when you reminisce in your old age.

Screen Shot 2017-05-24 at 10.26.11 AM

Peace in our time.

Peace that might morph into long lasting peace.

President Trump is a pacifist and that’s something the snowflakes out there do not even know it.

Peace is a hard won gift, and we must give the man some credit for it, especially now that the whole Russia hysteria that has befallen America’s mass media starts resembling another Mac Arthur era hysterical Red Witch-hunt that the Democrats always loved and thrived inside of it by snitching on all of their opponents and then claiming the high ground. Snitches and stool pigeons is all the Democratic party ever was made up of. Ahh and some really Evil people that like t assassinate others.

Peace in out Time and avoidance of Nuclear War…

There goes another nail in the coffin of the Neo-Con Clinton-Obama-Kissinger doctrine of intervention, regime change, globalization, and all other neo-con trouble these meddling evil makers had sought to unleash. Hoping that the ensuing conflict would usher in the World government under the Orders of the establishment Oligarchy, and the Global government of Kleptocrats, and Plutocrats — the Clintons represented as the anointed children of the banker- Wanker class.

So, these banker elites are now seeing the two major conflicts they have engineered for the world stuttering are concerned about there usefulness and are pushing for festering conflict inside our Country. That is why the Mass Media gay vixens, constantly undermine President Trump through the CNN = the Clinton News Network, and the other Conehead News Networks out there, in order to stop their evil plans form collapsing totally. Indeed, we have all seen the desire of the World’s Banking elites, to always support the meddlesome ways of the Obama-Clinton-Kissinger schemers bloody NeoCon evil schemers but now we also know the Reason why.

We have seen their meddlesome footprint when trying to encircle Russia and steal her ancestral territories, resulting in the war in Syria, and Ukraine, and in potential conflicts in the Caucasus and the Baltics.

And of course there are differences.

Whereas the still ongoing war in Ukraine’s east is limited but increasingly lethal — the war in Syria is just lethal without any limits. Yet they are both efforts by the previous administration to meddle, realign, and destroy traditional Russian allies. But times have changed. Therefore, stopping both conflicts, is in the best interests of the United States at the same time that it is the best sign of International Stability, Safety, & Security, that the Trump Administration can demonstrate for the whole world.

Three summers ago, the world watched the barbarity of the downing of Malaysia Airline Flight 17 and the brutal lack of respect shown to the European dead, by the Russian-backed rebels and their “authorities” in the Eastern Ukrainian front. This we have seen unfold in our TV news reports, but the hidden and unseen horrors perpetrated in Ukraine, same as in Syria, have been far greater. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) estimated that from the beginning of the Russian-backed conflict up through February 2017, at least 35,993 people (including 639 children) have been killed and at least 74,595 (including 1,969 children) wounded in the contest over Ukraine’s east.

The reason that we have such good and precise information is because Ukraine is in the heart of Europe and with more than two million people who have been displaced around Ukraine’s regions internally, along with the almost two million people that have left the country altogether – we are seeing a comparable humanitarian catastrophe to that of Syria, albeit playing out in the middle of Europe today…

Fancy that.

For the first time in 75 years, Western leaders are forced to devise a strategy in the face of a major power conflict over European territory. In this task, strategic thinkers are naturally turning back to the darkest lessons of the twentieth century for guidance. But which lessons? Some proceed cautiously in this centennial year of the Second Battle of Ypres, mindful of how escalation and national pride can lead to unexpected consequences and tragedy.

This is exactly what French President François Hollande said later that year: “If we don’t manage to find not just a compromise, but a lasting peace agreement in Ukraine, we know perfectly well what the scenario will be. It has a name, it’s called war.”

Others look to the lessons of the appeasement of Nazi Germany that led to the Second World War. At the 2015 Munich Security Conference – taking place in the very same city, where back in 1938 the foolish, yet peace seeking leaders of Britain and France made their craven deal with Adolf Hitler over Czechoslovakia that led to its annexation in the same year 1938 – today’s international participants came together to discuss the Ukraine crisis, with zero results.

Senator John McCain, who in February said that he was “ashamed” of Washington’s response to the crisis, drew the most explicit comparison to British prime minister Neville Chamberlain’s acceptance of Hitler’s demands. “History shows us that dictators will always take more if you let them,” McCain said. “They will not be dissuaded from their brutal behavior when you fly to meet them to Moscow – just as leaders once flew to this city.”

Senator Lindsey Graham made an ironic echo of one the most famous Churchillian wartime phrases, telling delegates: “When you turn down a reasonable request to help defend one’s self – it’s not our finest hour.”

Yet later in the year, British prime minister David Cameron warned his fellow European leaders about the dangers of appeasement: “We run the risk of repeating the mistakes made in Munich in ’38 … This time we cannot meet Putin’s demands. He has already taken Crimea, and we cannot allow him to take the whole country.” Former Polish prime minister Donald Tusk, now president of the European Council, recently tweeted that “Once again, appeasement encourages the aggressor to greater acts of violence.”

In a television interview from the Munich Security Conference, Senator Ted Cruz went further saying, that the United States has “a treaty obligation to stand with” the Ukrainians“ yet until now, unfortunately, the Obama-Clinton Administration did not honor that obligation, because of their strict adherence to the Clinton-Obama-Kissinger NeoCon doctrine the US expressed through Secretary Clinton and Secretary John Kerry, to the dismay of the civilized World.

Donald Trump however, turns a new leaf, as he says that we need to come together and provide defensive arms to Ukraine, so they can stand up against the Russian aggression in Crimea and in their East. And it appears that his hard stand against Russia has already produced results, because the Russian backed rebels already sued for Peace and have already agreed to a cease-fire agreement.

Senator Cruz was referring to the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, which promised that Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom would uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders.

In the event of a breach, however, the agreement merely promises that the three powers “will consult.” Above all, with apologies to Senator Cruz, the Budapest Memorandum is not a treaty binding the United States to militarily defend Ukraine, as we would have to do with a NATO ally. It is a diplomatic agreement, which it is not binding, but does convey moral obligation. In 1994, Ukraine relinquished what was then the third-largest nuclear force in the world in exchange for what it considered the consecration of its sovereignty and borders. While refugees pour into Kiev and the sounds of guns grow louder in the east, Ukraine has every reason to expect assistance from the United States and Britain. But what are the best ways these two countries can help?

That is the unknown and as Donald Trump formulates his Foreign Policy now, and considers the options and alternatives – he is hampered by the lack of a clear US practical policy on the subject.

And as world leaders rummage through the crises of the past to inform their thinking, more attention is being turned back to Winston Churchill, the most fertile strategic mind of modern times, the man who defined for all time the price of appeasement.

In opposition to the government of his own party, Winston Churchill famously told Neville Chamberlain:

“You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor; and you will have war as well.”

Is that our choice today?

Or to put it another way, is Vladimir Putin another Adolf Hitler, and should we respond to him as the democracies should have responded to Hitler from the start?

Let’s remember Churchill who had derided Chamberlain, yet still asked that he joins him in the cabinet…

In reality channeling Churchill, is not about Seeing Hitler everywhere, or wherever we like to throw shade. Far from it. And above all else, this is a cheap shot because Foreign Policy should not be made on the basis of facile historical comparisons. And if you want to bring forth a Leader’s directive, you should best know the man and know his thinking — if you want to channel his reasonable intellect and his formidable power of will and courage.

Or you can ask me.

Ask me and I’ll be sure to answer you because there are insights to be gleaned from asking the important questions… that reveal the strength of the underlying REASON.

So let start by asking some questions like this:

1) Does Putin represents a threat to the safety of the people and to the stability of the World, similar to that posed by Hitler?

2) Is the case for this hastily conceived comparison made by Secretary Clinton fake and superficial, because it only supports her electoral political goals?

3) Was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton disingenuous, and lying through her heavily botoxed face when she compared Putin’s strategy in Ukraine to Hitler’s strategy in Czechoslovakia?

Answer these three questions and then let’s talk…

You’ll be a lot wiser after the mental arithmetic entailed in these questions and Yu will certainly be taken forward to the level of understanding Political Reality through the process of the Socratic Dialogue.

Certain similarities between Putin and Hitler are easily made. But that does not mean they are correct.

Surely we all know that much like Hitler, Putin cultivates a cult of personality — though one imagines that the bodily inferior Hitler would have been truly embarrassed to revel in the bare-chested heroics, the judo, or the bare horseback riding, and the hockey playing that Putin regularly performs.

And if Hitler had the same effect that Putin had for Russian television viewers, we will never know because Putin is having fun — whereas old Adolf was always behaved as if he were a victim of constipation with a permanent stick-up-the-ass posture. And unlike Hitler, Putin doesn’t only pretend, but he truly owns the superior Leader’s steely affect that surely insulates him from the largely imagined resentments over conspiracies and slights against his homeland, most Russian people are supposed to feel today, if you listen to and watch the Conehead news network, CNN and the other Western Mass Media that Americans indulge into all day long.

Yet if you are smart and you can find on Youtube and really listen to Putin’s recent state of the union address where he identified a malevolent and yet still semi-scheming “America” in the place of Hitler’s international Jewish conspiracy, by saying “they are always influencing Russia’s relations with its neighbors, either openly or behind the scenes” you can see how he has turned the tables around and how he has FIRST used this tired “Conspiracy Theory” the whole of America’s Mass Media is using today against Trump.

And by seeing the Youtube State of the Russia address of President Putin you might get educated about the man’s essence. And you might also learn something about his style of strong yet plainspoken leadership, because Putin despises Hitler’s operatic comportment (Thank God for that), and yet his more monotone simple language is realistic and spoken to the simple people. And that is why it works so well…

Capice snowflakes?

Surely some historians and even some uneducated people would have this gem to throw at your swines: “Both Hitler and Putin rose to power through democratic politics.”
Yet this amazing diamond stemming form a morsel of truth is untrue. Putin rose to power thought Democratic means but Hitler decidedly not so. Hitler instead rose to power like all good Socialists, by crook and hook. His Socialist party only came to power through assassination, through the Putzh, through the Coup d’ Etat, and through his dictatorial fiat, and the murder of his opponents, and lastly through the burning of the Reichstag and the blaming of his opponents for it. Hitler used all the deception tools of Politics, starting from the propaganda machine, to the rigging and the theft of primary elections, to the corruption of General Elections, and the Krystalnacht putsch in order to become the Führer.

Unlike all that, President Putin has chosen to gradually hollow out the Duma and affect the whole of Russian democracy by increasing the persecutions and potentially the imprisonment of challenging competitors, and by slightly tweaking the Russian constitution to lengthen his hold on power, and also transform the media into more mainstream voices reflecting his reality…

After all Hitler was a Socialist whereas Putin s none of that sort. He is as much a Capitalist as president Trump is and that boggles the end of snowflakes of the Left and of the Right in equal measure.

Still, the point is that democracy and the trappings of popular elections are hugely appealing to President Putin along with a real Parliament named Duma, that acts forcefully for the interests of the Russian people. Mind you, those are not mere decorative matters for Russia and for Mr Putin, but are the very rudders of the strength of the country for the many yeas to come. Because they are the democratic institutions that will endure long after Putin will be gone from office and buried as it happens to all men — leaders of commoners. But he will be a historical footnote or a Historical Leader and that is still up to him. As for us – we must recognize that the strong leader President Putin surely is — cares more about his hockey game than about poll results, and he feels the call of the ice to play hockey upon, far more than he feels the need to be elected again and again.

This is the proof of a man that loves his Life and enjoys living it. He loves his sports, his women, his family and his country and he thrives doing what’s right for all of them. He is definitely a pure living legend and a teetotaler like Trump and not some kind of chemically imbalanced, bipolar, depressed and heavily addicted to opiates, cannabis, and alcohol slushed non-entity like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were while pretending to be leading the Free World in there socialist ways.

And that is what makes all the difference.

So we can at long last start seeing Putin as a true Leader.

And let’s hope that as much as Putin is a true Russian man — our own President Donald Trump is an American Man unaffected by the germs of Socialism and Depressive personality disorder that makes all the socialist snowflakes to swoon, to melt, and to fall when the Sun shines and the Light of day falls upon them.

Because indeed President Putin is not some kind of a made up little mustachioed Dictator like the artless corporal from Vienna the little socialist boy-man Adolf fvckin Hitler.

Can you see that?



Continue reading…

Still, let us suppose, for argument’s sake, that President Putin shares some remote Adolf Hitler. And maybe he goes nuts and for sartorial reasons starts wearing a tiny mustache lie Hitler did, and like Mr Mugabe still does today. Why is it that all the Socialists all wear the same clothes lie the Mao pantsuits that secretary Clinton wore and that the

Does that mean the West must rush to resist him militarily?

Would anything less, meet Winston Churchill’s definition of appeasement?

Many sophisticated Russia watchers give a calmer appraisal of Putin, seeing him as just another autocrat playing for popularity and gain, a cool customer using an engineered crisis at home, in order to justify his power to his people – all the while bluffing the West in order to achieve incremental victories in his domination of Russia’s “Near Abroad.”

As for Putin’s blend of Russian Orthodox nationalism and strong dose of authoritarianism, this is no doubt a heady brew, one whose principal goal is to reassemble Russia’s lost empire. Yet Putin’s revanchism lacks the moral insanity, and the deadly ambition, that was at the core of Adolph Hitler’s Nazi ideology. And seriously now, invading France is hardly on Putin’s timetable of historical conquest, but being the richest man alive is. And this in terms of personal characteristics alone, let’s suppose for argument’s sake that Vladimir Putin is indeed “another Hitler.”

Would it follow that the West should rush to resist him militarily, even through proxies?

Again if the questions is that — then what response from the United States is required so that it would NOT meet Winston Churchill’s definition of appeasement and instead rise to his standard of the “Our Finest Hour” speech’s perspective?

Think about that for a moment, because one undeniable difference, is that those who draw inspiration from Winston Churchill’s defiance of Hitler. in order to advocate for unlimited and massive military assistance to Ukraine — must also factor in another undeniable difference between Hitler and Putin. And that bit is what makes all the difference.

The fact is Hitler never possessed nuclear weapons, so he never had the capacity for the mutually assured destruction of the World. Hitler never had the capacity to destroy all that we hold dear on this earth, whereas Russia today has got exactly that.

Russia has invested continuously since the 1960’s on it’s ICBM fleet, and also in updating and modernizing its strategic nuclear weapons systems also by packing multiple warheads on their new generations of mobile missiles. Russia’s arsenal also includes an estimated two thousand tactical nuclear weapons, in ICBM form all of which have destructive yields that are far far greater that any of the bombs that leveled Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of the Second World War.

Imagine two thousand of Nuclear Bomb tipped ICBMs flying out of our Atmosphere and up in Space, before turning down again and raining down straight on us from the high atmosphere…

Screen Shot 2017-05-24 at 10.26.59 AM

Nuclear Winter is not a very appealing season. Not only because it is rather long, but because nothing much will survive it. This is what we are trying to avoid after all…

Moreover, Russian military doctrine forthrightly advocates the use of tactical nuclear weapons to stave off a conventional defeat. Through wargames, the Russian military has worked out its concept of operations and possesses the muscle memory to execute it. Putin is now believed to be fielding an unknown number of tactical nuclear weapons on the Crimean peninsula for just this purpose.

On other fronts, if Russia were to invade the Baltic states, it might well follow it’s well rehearsed doctrine for small nukes in the battle field, but not follow through on its threats to use tactical nuclear weapons against NATO in battle, because Russia knows that it runs the risk of underestimating NATO and the serious risk of escalation from the tactical to the strategic.

Still those, watching Mass Media and their useful fools, like Senator McCain, and others who believe that unlimited military support of Ukraine would stop Putin in his tracks, often cast themselves as following Winston Churchill’s assertion that a united and early show of force by the Allies against Germany would have stopped Hitler’s adventurism.

Sadly, they are totally wrong in this assumptive scenario.

They are wrong and they don’t even know it. But if you want to ascertain the veracity of this statement try this at home. Ask yourself the following question: Would you push yourself along with your family and the rest of us to the brink of Nuclear War?

Would you push the launch button while your family sleeps soundly their beds?

Would you be able to live with yourself after the Nuclear Annihilation to follow or are you going to wish to be dead soon as possible?

What are the benefits of a long life?

These are the Socratic questions You must answer along with another one, because all those who want NATO today to militarily back Ukraine in it’s struggles with Russia — her eternal Master — must also answer the following important question:

“If nuclear weapons had existed in the 1930s, would Winston Churchill have supported such a preventative war?”

Would Winston Churchill have offered another “Finest Hour” speech or even have supported a motion to declare war with Russia over the splitting conquest of Poland if nuclear weapons in ICBM form were targeting Great Britain and all other Free World countries?

In short, would Winston Churchill have been all out in favor of a robust physical response if Hitler had possessed an arsenal capable of annihilating all the cities of France, Britain, and the United States and those of the rest of the Free World, within a single hour?


Screen Shot 2017-05-24 at 10.26.37 AM

Again Winston was a good reader of the minds of men and he could tell you easily that Putin is far from an Adolf. Indeed Putin is a benign person to his people and to most people around the world, but he is a tough enemy to his enemies. So we ought to respect this. Whatever we accuse “Volodya” of — is not Socialist extremism or the extermination of whole Peoples and Ethnic groups. Volodya (=Vladimir Putin) is what lesser men fear, but an Alpha male like Trump is quite OK with him. And so would have been Winston Churchill, another big swinging Alpha male who was able to assure his people of Victory and Success. So whatever weapons might Winston Churchill might have sought to counter Russian aggression with and whatever resources he would bring to bear — he would never risk Nuclear Armageddon just in order to antagonize Russia today, and instead he would make fast friends with Volodya and make merry over a feast fueled with “voda” and dancing girls, in his dacha out of Moscow… and away form the gossip of Kremlin.

Of course after the two great men’s night meeting, as the sun rises in the morning, the translator has got to be shot… as usual.

I am saying this because we all know that Winston Churchill was an ingenious and imaginative charismatic thinker and a Leader coming up with innovative solutions — so we must expect something unique, but friendship and mutual understanding was always his method of solving crises. Personal intervention and personal attention towards building bridges counted the most for Churchill and I believe that it also counts a whole lot for Donald Trump today.

Greatly Innovative and Goodly Unique Policy design, is what should describe our New Response to this kind of threats today. Surely we do not have to entertain such a hypothetical world to understand Winston Churchill’s approach to resisting an encroaching power in the nuclear age, but as certain U.S. senators try to “channel” Winston Churchill and his indomitable spirit, great care should be taken to appreciate the subtleties of Winston Churchill’s thinking across the breadth of his career and specifically about the Nuclear Age Weapons of Mass Destruction.

A yet closer look at Winston Churchill’s speeches, writings and utterances, towards his Conservative colleagues as leader of the opposition (1945–1951) and of his talks during Cabinet meetings of his second premiership (1951–1955) — all suggest that Winston Churchill would advocate a new innovative policy. Perhaps a policy towards Russia, that is steeped in the clouds of intellectually contrived “prophesy” and yet appears to the world, as a firm yet cautious approach in response to Putin’s Russia.

But first Winston would have made a fast friend of Vladimir Putin as he had made of the much more difficult person of Joseph Stalin — whom he counted as a real yet somwhat untrustworthy friend. Still his real response would be to obfuscate his aims, and secure his goals, in the peculiarly Churchillian shroud of Mystery, diplomacy and the Art of Statesmanship. And that is what we need now in our Russian policy in order to come out of it unscathed.

We need a master of subterfuge, and diplomacy from the Master of Political Illusion, and Statecraft. President Trump is the best that we’ve got for that today…

And indeed we need all the strength of his bravado along with his capable mind — because he has installed Winston Churchill state again inside the Oval Office of the White House in order to draw daily inspiration by looking at Winston’s effigy and imaging in his response.

A nifty trick because Winston himself was crucially involved in the development of the Nuclear weapons, and luckily he know a whole lot about the subject.

Lucky for us also today because we have records of his reasoning and his masterful thoughts and ideas on the subject matter of Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction, and we will examine these herewith…

 Still for purposes of learning and intellectual muscle memory, please repeat after me ad infinitum: “Putin is not Hitler” and  keep repeating it, until the red scare cows come home…

To be continued…

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 23, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 15)

“Our footprints in history aren’t made by those resting in front of the telly watching the footie, or their favorite sports team playing, or the mass media whores, but by walking towards the Sun of Righteousness and working to bring Daybreak and Light to those less fortunate amongst us.”

–Dr Churchill

We need to move towards the sun, and we need to focus on doing the right things for our fellow Human Beings, because this is of the utmost imperative. That is why I work to liberate the slaves of Africa today, just as much as our forefathers worked hard to that end, when they recognized the historical and ethical imperative to liberate the African slaves in America, during the early 1860’s under President Abraham Lincoln’s statesmanship.

Back then it was Honest Abe, who gave us also these memorable quotes:

“Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.”
“Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.”
“And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years.

But what about Africa today?”

–Abraham Lincoln

Yet today it is up to me and you. all working together inside the Lincoln Party of America that seeks to uphold the heavy mantle of Liberty for Humanity as well as for the Rights of All People that we see now as a historical necessity.

But what about Africa’s prospects for growth & development, and for real economic growth prospects for all of it’s people instead of just for the benefits of the political entrepreneurs?

And what about Africa’s growing subservience to Islam?

IJzeren voetring voor gevangenen transparent background.png

What about Africa’s robust slave trade that is sanctioned by Islam, and the Koran, since it first got started by Islamic Muslim and Arab traders, a thousand years ago and intensified i the past four centuries, and it is still going strong today?

How about the growing Islamic religious penetration, of this dogma of fanaticism and hate into all the corners of Africa and the displacement of the classical cultures and earth bound religions of the many indigenous peoples?

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.42.50 PM

The Arab slave trade was the practice of slavery in the Arab world, mainly in Western Asia, North Africa, Southeast Africa, the Horn of Africa and Europe. This barter occurred chiefly between the medieval era and the early 21st century. The trade was conducted through slave markets in these areas, with the slaves captured mostly from Africa’s interior.

A 19th-century European engraving of Arab slave-trading caravan transporting African slaves across the Sahara.

The trade of slaves across the Sahara and across the Indian Ocean also has a long history, beginning with the control of sea routes by Muslim Arab and Swahili traders on the Swahili Coast during the ninth century (see Sultanate of Zanzibar). These traders captured Bantu peoples (Zanj) from the interior in present-day Kenya, Mozambique and Tanzania and brought them to the littoral. There, the slaves gradually assimilated in the rural areas, particularly on the Unguja and Pemba islands.

Some historians assert that as many as 17 million people were sold into slavery on the coast of the Indian Ocean, the Middle East, and North Africa, and approximately 5 million African slaves were bought by Muslim slave traders and taken from Africa across the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara desert between 1500 and 1900.

The captives were sold throughout the Middle East. This trade accelerated as superior ships led to more trade and greater demand for labour on plantations in the region. Eventually, tens of thousands of captives were being taken every year. The Indian Ocean slave trade was multi-directional and changed over time. To meet the demand for menial labor, Bantu slaves bought by Arab slave traders from southeastern Africa were sold in cumulatively large numbers over the centuries to customers in Egypt, Arabia, the Persian Gulf, India, European colonies in the Far East, the Indian Ocean islands, Ethiopia and Somalia.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.46.00 PM

Slave labor in East Africa was drawn from the Zanj, Bantu peoples that lived along the East African coast. The Zanj were for centuries shipped as slaves by Arab traders to all the countries bordering the Indian Ocean. The Umayyad and Abbasid caliphs recruited many Zanj slaves as soldiers and, as early as 696, there were slave revolts of the Zanj against their Arab enslavers in Iraq (see Zanj Rebellion). Ancient Chinese texts also mention ambassadors from Java presenting the Chinese emperor with two Seng Chi (Zanj) slaves as gifts, and Seng Chi slaves reaching China from the Hindu kingdom of Srivijaya in Java.

The Zanj Rebellion, a series of uprisings that took place between 869 and 883 AD near the city of Basra (also known as Basara), situated in present-day Iraq, is believed to have involved enslaved Zanj that had originally been captured from the African Great Lakes region and areas further south in East Africa. It grew to involve over 500,000 slaves and free men who were imported from across the Muslim empire and claimed over “tens of thousands of lives in lower Iraq”. The Zanj who were taken as slaves to the Middle East were often used in strenuous agricultural work. As the plantation economy boomed and the Arabs became richer, agriculture and other manual labor work was thought to be demeaning. The resulting labor shortage led to an increased slave market. It is certain that large numbers of slaves were exported from eastern Africa; the best evidence for this is the magnitude of the Zanj revolt in Iraq in the 9th century, though not all of the slaves involved were Zanj. There is little evidence of what part of eastern Africa the Zanj came from, for the name is here evidently used in its general sense, rather than to designate the particular stretch of the coast, from about 3°N. to 5°S., to which the name was also applied.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.42.04 PM

The Zanj were needed to take care of the Tigris-Euphrates delta, which had become abandoned marshland as a result of peasant migration and repeated flooding, and could only be reclaimed through intensive labor. Wealthy proprietors “had received extensive grants of tidal land on the condition that they would make it arable.” Sugar cane was prominent among the products of their plantations, particularly in Khūzestān Province. Zanj also worked the salt mines of Mesopotamia, especially around Basra.

Their jobs were to clear away the nitrous topsoil that made the land arable. The working conditions were also considered to be extremely harsh and miserable. Many other people were imported into the region, besides Zanj.

Historian M. A. Shaban has argued that rebellion was not a slave revolt, but a revolt of blacks (zanj). In his opinion, although a few runaway slaves did join the revolt, the majority of the participants were Arabs and free Zanj. If the revolt had been led by slaves, they would have lacked the necessary resources to combat the Abbasid government for as long as they did.

A female Bantu slave in Mogadishu (1882–1883) Somali land…

Muslims also enslaved Europeans. According to Robert Davis, between 1 million and 1.25 million Europeans were captured between the 16th and 19th centuries by Barbary corsairs, who were vassals of the Ottoman Empire, and sold as slaves. These slaves were captured mainly from seaside villages from Italy, Spain, Portugal and also from more distant places like France or England, the Netherlands, Ireland and even Iceland. They were also taken from ships stopped by the pirates.

The effects of these attacks were devastating: France, England, and Spain each lost thousands of ships. Long stretches of the Spanish and Italian coasts were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants, because of frequent pirate attacks. Pirate raids discouraged settlement along the coast until the 19th century.

Periodic Muslim raiding expeditions were sent from Islamic Iberia to ravage the Christian Iberian kingdoms, bringing back slaves. In a raid against Lisbon in 1189, for example, the Almohad Berber Muslim caliph, Abu Yusuf Yaqub al-Mansur, took 3,000 female and child captives, while his governor of Córdoba, in a subsequent attack upon Silves in 1191, took 3,000 Christian slaves.

The “Oriental” or “Arab” slave trade is called the “Islamic” slave trade, because a religious imperative was the driver of the slavery. “Islamic trade” or “Islamic world” treats Africa as being outside Islam, or a negligible portion of the Islamic world, and often times the propagators of Islam in Africa often revealed a cautious attitude towards proselytizing because of its effect in reducing the potential reservoir of slaves…

And as for Africa today, in it’s totality — let’s start with that part of Africa that defines itself as North Africa and the Middle East…

It is here where you can see that Islam is Slavery and also the other way around.

Thanks to Mohammed we have institutionalized Slavery that is embedded in the Koran and that makes it rather difficult t eradicate for this Eartha s along as people still believe that shite…

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.45.39 PM

Yet today N.A.M.E. is how the State Department calls this region of North Africa & Middle East and there is a reason for that. Because this is how they called it “NAME” when they fashioned Obama’s and secretary Clinton’s attack on the people too the region called NAME, that the Mass Media “sold” to you as the “Arab Spring.” This was the silly nomenclature of the disinformation propaganda campaign of  secretary Clinton working to fool the world as always and falling flat o her face. Yet they managed to convince the liberal apologists of the US interventions all around the world that this American Policy staged “regime change” was somehow fueled by citizens taking to Twitter and by Facebook revolutionaries who turned the Anti-Americanism displayed on these nations into a swell tide of American Love as exhibited in Benghazi in Libya where they even assassinated the United States Ambassador in a show of gushing Love. Chris Stevens and his colleagues had to die to prove that point and secretary Clinton made sure of that. She made sure of it because as she said it was a mob that was formed because of a Youtube video and therefore this is what the Dems and Hillary would have you believe whereas in reality they never batted an eyelash nor did they bother to wake up and send some help to the stricken Embassy and it’s dying ambassador and to all other defenders & the rest of the staff.  Imagine that. The secretary who is their nominal chief — abandoned them to a certain death at the hands of the Islamic Militants — in order to prove her point, so that her BS propaganda will not get revealed.

Perhaps Obama and secretary Clinton had made it clear how Muslims were outraged by the violence perpetuated by ISIS, that they had themselves created — and they didn’t want to aggravate them further by defending the life of the ambassador — but that memo has been shredded in the Spring Cleaning that Hilary did when she was wiping down her hacked server…

Same as the result of the Clinton and Obama creation of ISIS that has caused misery to millions across the world.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.44.07 PM

At least I didn’t get that memo where the mighty Obama – Clinton team liberated North Africa and the Middle East, but what I’ve got is this photo above to remind me of their many successes.

And I’ve only got that by speaking to the average, the normal, and to the middle of the road Muslim people out there, who were also enraged by ISIS but couldn’t stand up to them for fear of reprisals and assassination attempts.

Yet this is what they all had to say, because the simple people have a very different ideology about their interpretation of the Koran, the Hadith, and even Sharia law, and are seriously bothered that their own religion is interpreted by the radical islamic terrorists in ways most of them would never dream as an ideal, let alone a way to be envisaged as their government in their own lifetime.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.46.00 PM

You see — they don’t like the slide to the Dark Ages anymore than you or I like to have a Thousand years of darkness befall upon us all over again.

Because when it comes to ISIS, strategies to minimise their importance or any link between them and the Islamic faith have not been made i any serious way.

Indeed regular Muslim leaders have even described them as “a bunch of thugs” that must not be considered a state, nor an Islamic Caliphate, or even a military power in the region — but apparently they very much are… because they control territory greater than the size of England and France combined as their power shifts and wanes form a Nadir to a Zenith of territorial gains with the same frequency as the wind blows n the Sahara.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.46.53 PM

And in the face of global terror attacks organised and inspired by ISIS, this is way more than thugs that make you cross the road on a Saturday night, and the global reach of ISIS cannot be denied if they can pull off attacks simultaneously in America, in Europe, in Russia, and in Asia and Africa….

These people who wouldn’t blink twice about killing a bunch of little children as they have done in the Manchester concert of Ariana Grande — where three scores of our young girls have been blown to pieces and many tens of other heavily injured and about twenty thousand of children scarred for life and traumatized with PTSD for ever…

Think about it…

The suicide bombers screaming “Allah Akbar” as they detonate their backpack bombs, the televised beheadings and the crucifixions — all performed by ISIS militants in front of the cameras, are designed to make us not only appalled and frightened by their savagery, but to remind us of a bloody history during the lifetime of Mohammed who was a strong advocate of the use of bloody terror to advance his career.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.14.35 PM

And yet ISIS justification, is what the liberal mass media are all doing today, and that is the same thing that was done by the elites in Meccah and Medina during the lifetime of Mohammed and thus they feel that they are justified by reference to the Koran that endorses their hateful and barbaric acts through their appeal to proper Islamic reading of their admittedly ultra barbaric and luridly violent book.

And whilst a theological context can be made to counter this modern interpretation, a far simpler one is that these were the tortures and punishment of the age when Islam originated. Hence they are far more shocking today.

A reminder of today’s violence is the mobile video footage of the Paris attack, with people running for their lives as a pregnant woman hanged out of a window at the “Bataclan” neighborhood. Or the faces of Yazidi people in Lalish, facing a genocide because they are considered devil worshippers, and thus ISIS has been intend to kill them and enslave them in order to purge them from the land. Because for the Militant Islamic Muslims there is one God, and Mohammed is His Prophet, and all other people who don’t believe that nonsense have to be enslaved and killed until such time they accept that blood soaked lesson.

It would appear that when fanaticism meets Koranic and Muslim monotheism, the horrors will terrorise the land as a howling wind blowing over the red soaked dunes. Such acts against a people must not be forgotten, and when being carried out — the reasons for it, should never be ignored.

Indeed now the Yazidi people are missing from Syria and Iraq, and therefore we must recognize that they have been exterminated by any definition of the word. This is not propaganda for ISIS, but I would describe it as ISIS reality…

Further the Mass Media propaganda trying to cover up the crimes of ISIS claims that the Islamic Muslim Militants demanded “jizya” a tax for non-Muslims under an Islamic state, to be collected from the Yazidis, and from the Christians, who refused to pay, and as a result, were forced to retreat to Mount Sinjar in western Mosul.

The denial of genocide by CNN and by Huffington Post, and by MSNBC, and even by the Southern Poverty Law Center, was called out by me at the time — but in general my alert call was ignored by most mass media. Yet to ignore such an alert call is an issue involving what ISIS want to do with the Yazidi. Do they go for cultural genocide by forced conversion or genocide by mass extermination by ISIS?

This is what needs telling, and sharing, and how such people as the Christians of Mosul, and the Yazidi are looked at in Islam. Are they to be killed like a goat for food, or to be seen as tax dodgers to be harassed, or even be seen as devil worshippers to be silenced and shot like stray dogs?

The silence is itself a propaganda coup for ISIS. When people refuse to call out genocide, there is a complicity in the actions of others that should make us nauseous.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.14.17 PM

There is a ‘Terror List’ of targets in the Untied States and we have been waiting to see it play out but we have already produced a briefing document entitled ‘Preventing Terrorism: where next for the United States?’ that sent to all government departments and not just to the Deputy Security Advisors… This document also sets out reforms we feel are necessary to compliment the Government’s counter-terrorism strategy. The Government’s strategy needs reform.

Here’s our test: In places where wearing a balaclava, a motorcycle helmet or a face mask would be deemed inappropriate, so should be if you were to be wearing a niqab. It’s simple really.

It is simple, unless you want to make someone out, to be an extremist against Muslims, then please read the simple facts.

I call this a dangerous game of accusing people, that may be more liberal than yourself, of things which fundamentalists are prepared to kill us for…

Being “blasphemous” makes you an extremist in the eyes of the average muslim and this seems to be the mainstream opinion of muslim people in general.

Is this meant to be a joke?

Problem is this is no laughing  matter – and now in light of the Manchester attacks this is where muslim fundamentalists and extremists try to impose a religious Islamic orthodoxy. This is not just dangerous — it is pure evil.

It is reprehensible, because the reality remains that in Great Britain today, more Muslims join ISIS than they join the British army…

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.15.07 PM

Maajid Nawaz began leaving Islamism, during his incarceration in Egypt. He was not the finished liberal secular product when he came back to the UK. He has mentioned that, and how in a short time after being released he realised he had to make a clean break from his former politics and religious affiliations, in his book: “Radical.”

None of what the Southern Poverty Law Centre has said points to Maajid Nawaz as being an extremist, let alone anti-Muslim. The bar set by this report will make any liberating activism by Muslims as being against all Muslims and against Islam…

If you are the “wrong” sort of muslim you are to be branded an extremist. You will be declared a blasphemer. This is irresponsible, and dangerous. It also shows why the work the Quilliam Foundation, and Maajid Nawaz do, is absolutely essential and really necessary.

We expect the fundamentalists and the extremists to declare people blasphemous or to call them traitors to their faith. For others to act as their willing mouthpiece brings shame to the Southern Poverty Law Centre.

But let us examine where do your views on the Yazidi place you?

Twitter gives us a glimpse.

No wonder the Yazidi are not mentioned in the review. It’s “Yazidi hyperbole … hugely exaggerated” used as a “ruse” by America. When you are downplaying the atrocities of ISIS, no wonder it’s Tom Holland you want to focus on.


Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.13.56 PM

In my mind ISIS are not rather religiously observant, nor theologically knowledgable — but they use all of the Koran to their benefit. The thieves who have their hands cut off by ISIS would applaud such a sleight of hand if they could at missing the obvious. The reason for ISIS fighting is that they think that they alone have the right way of living the faith. Jihad comes first. After that comes conquest. And then comes the sharia law and the muslim militant islam way of life. This you could hear them chanting… and the fact that we have far more muslims in England today joining ISIS rather than joining the British armed forces — got to give us pause.

The simplicity of calling an anti-Islamic ideology hateful for pointing this out, does not bare scrutiny. If you are to call anyone who does not believe Mohammed is a prophet, or that believe that the Koran is a text composed by human mammals rather than the whisperingings of an angel, as being anti-Islam, then take a closer look at ISIS. For there is the divide that they wish all Muslims to make between themselves and non-Muslims. If you do not feel about Islam as they do, you are an apostate. As the destroyed Shia mosques in Mosul, bear out the truth, and as the graffiti marking where Sunni, Shia and Yazidi, had once lived together in peace shows — we might as well look at these religious and ethnic tensions as views of the same coin…

Western colonialism via Napoleon and the bloody French Revolution. How an uprising against monarchy unleashed an imperialism to bring the enlightenment not just to Europe by force, but to Muslims via the invasion of Egypt to plunder its riches as Alexander the Great once did. Religion was meant to be the past, reason the future. Instead what we have seen played out over generations is a battle of ideas, which once had gullitones on the ground and now drones in the air, making their deadly point. Potentially we are all in the cross hairs thanks to the past and how it is reimagined today by all sides.

We need to dispel the ‘Few Extremists’ Myth – because the Muslim World Is Overcome with Hate, and it is a falsehood when people declare that jihadists represent the “tiny few extremists” who sully the reputation of an otherwise peace-loving and tolerant Muslim faith.

Because in reality, the truth is far more troubling — that jihadists represent the natural and inevitable outgrowth of a faith that is given over to hate on a massive scale, with hundreds of millions of believers holding views that Americans would rightly find revolting. Not all Muslims are hateful, of course, but so many are that it’s not remotely surprising that the world is wracked by wave after wave of jihadist violence.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.48.25 PM

To understand the Muslim edifice of hate, imagine it as a pyramid — with broadly-shared bigotry at the bottom, followed by stair steps of escalating radicalism — culminating in jihadist armies that in some instances represent a greater share of their respective populations than does the active-duty military in the United States. The base of the pyramid, the most broadly held hatred in the Islamic world, is anti-Semitism, with staggering numbers of Muslims expressing anti-Jewish views.

In 2014, the Anti-Defamation League released the results of polling 53,100 people in 102 countries for evidence of anti-Semitic attitudes and beliefs. The numbers from the majority-Muslim world are difficult to believe for those steeped in politically correct rhetoric about Islam. A full 74 percent of North African and Middle Eastern residents registered anti-Semitic beliefs, including 92 percent of Iraqis, a whopping 69 percent of relatively secular Turks, and 74 percent of Saudis. RELATED: The Controversy over Syrian Refugees Misses the Question We Should Be Asking The trend toward Muslim anti-Semitism continues even when Muslim nations are far removed from the Arab–Israeli conflict. A solid majority — 61 percent — of majority-Muslim Malays harbor anti-Semitic attitudes, while only 13 percent of neighboring majority-Buddhist Thais are anti-Jewish. The next level of the pyramid is Muslim commitment to deadly Islamic supremacy.

In multiple Muslim nations, overwhelming majorities of Muslims support the death penalty for apostasy or blasphemy. Collectively, this means that hundreds of millions of men and women support capital punishment for the exercise of the basic human rights of freedom of expression and free exercise of religion: Moving beyond Islamic supremacy to the next step of the pyramid, enormous numbers of Muslims are terrorist sympathizers. It is still stunning to see how popular Osama bin Laden was early last decade, and even as his popularity plunged (as he grew weaker and more isolated), his public approval remained disturbingly high: But what about ISIS — the world’s most savage and deadly terror organization? The latest polling data show that while a majority of Muslims reject ISIS, extrapolating from the populations of polled countries alone shows that roughly 50 million people express sympathy for a terrorist army that burns prisoners alive, throws gay men from buildings, and beheads political opponents. In Pakistan a horrifying 72 percent couldn’t bring themselves to express an unfavorable view of ISIS: But sympathy for terror is different from active support, and here’s where the numbers are difficult to pin down.

Yet one thing is for certain: Muslims are One Hundred Percent haters of Jews just like Adolf Hitler was….

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 9.18.57 AM

Yet I know of databases that show how many Muslims give to jihadist charities, spread jihadist propaganda on social media, support radical preachers, or otherwise take concrete actions to advance the terrorists’ cause, and we know, that anti-Israel terrorism is so popular in Saudi Arabia that a telethon once raised $100 million to support the 2002 intifada in the space of less than 7 hours.

Such shows of anti-Jewish support included this charming scene: A 6-year-old boy, with a plastic gun slung over his shoulder and fake explosives strapped around his waist, walked into a donation center and made a symbolic donation of plastic explosives, according to Al Watan daily. It is from this fertile soil that jihadists grow. And here the numbers decisively belie the “few extremists” rhetoric. In Iran alone, the Revolutionary Guard represents a proportionate share of the population similar to the combined strength of the active-duty Army and Marines here in the United States. Between Boko Haram, the Al-Nusra front, ISIS, Hezbollah, Hamas, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Yemeni militias, Libyan militias, and many others, the number of active jihadists numbers in the hundreds of thousands; some estimates indicate that 100,000 are fighting in Syria alone.

Britain, today sees far more Muslims joining ISIS than the tiny number of British Muslims who join the British army.

Simply put, America’s leaders actively deceive the American people about the sheer scale of Muslim hatred and commitment to jihad. Rather than tell us the truth, the Obama administration, the Democratic party and the Clinton campaign who prominently positioned a Muslim fanatic as their face of inclusivity, and the whole mass media aristocracy — constantly lecture Americans about discrimination, apparently believing that only their scolding keeps the great redneck masses at bay. Telling us the truth won’t send Americans on an anti-Muslim killing spree. Instead, it will make us no more radical than Egypt’s president, who briefly made headlines earlier this year after calling for a “revolution” in Islam and decrying faith traditions that he admitted had been “sacralized over the centuries.”

Just to give a sense of proportion, the United States is a nation that honors military service, respects its veterans, and engages in a massive military recruiting effort that includes offering soldiers generous salaries, pensions, benefits, and the best military equipment in the world. Even then, only about 0.4 percent of the American population engages in active-duty military service at any given time. In Britain, more Muslims join ISIS than join the British army. Jihadists, by contrast, have low life expectancies, second-rate gear, low salaries, and often have to break domestic laws and journey across battlefields to join terrorist insurgencies, but still they join.

Telling this truth can demonstrate the scale of the problem and at least begin the process of convincing the American people that there is no quick fix, that the defense of the nation will require courage and resolve over the long term.

Islam has a problem. It is Muslims’ responsibility to reform their own faith. If they fail to come to grips with that honorable task — then the Western governments have to do this for them.

Screen Shot 2017-05-20 at 7.02.10 AM


Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 9.15.48 AM

But it is the American government and the governments of all other Christian nations that have the responsibility, to defend themselves and their citizens, against this Islamic Muslim onslaught of hate and barbarism.

Neither goal is advanced by telling convenient, politically correct lies.

After 1400 years of war imposed upon us by the crazed Muslims, can we finally tell the truth?

And after the betrayal of Constantinople by it’s resident Muslims who opened the gates to the besieging armies of Mohammed the Conqueror when the defenders and the Emperor were praying at the holiest church of Christendom the Hagia Sofia (Divine Wisdom) can we finally tell the truth about the barbarians that we have allowed to be inside our gates?

That is how the greatest City of Christendom fell in 1453 and is now named Istanbul and is part of the only Muslim nation with a small footprint in Europe: Islamic Fundamentalist Turkey of today with it’s seriously deluded muslim premiere Mr Erdogan, who is an Islamic Stalin cut out from the same cloth like Saddam Hussein,,,.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.52.37 PM

It was the middle of the road Muslims who had stayed inside Istanbul during the Muslim siege. And it was these same people who betrayed the city and it’s defenders to the enemy by opening the doors when the defenders were receiving Communion during the Holy Eucharist. And it is the moderate Muslim inhabitants of the Capital city of Byzantium that are ultimately responsible for indiscriminate slaughter and bloody mayhem that resulted from their betrayal. Because indeed three days of slaughter followed by the Arab Muslim conquest of Istanbul. Those moderate Muslim inhabitants of the City are responsible for the fall and for the slaughter of all their neighbors and of everyone else on site. And indeed these middle of the road Muslims have a lot more in common with the islamic extremists than you might think.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 2.22.58 PM

This was the truth back then in 1453, just as much as it is the truth today in 2017. Muslim reformation has never happened and that is why these people are so backward and barbaric… One would want to see at least some effort at reform…

And I have to say this: ISLAM NEEDS REFORMATION. And I shall continue to say this even though it is uncomfortable to acknowledge or admit this basic reality and historical necessity that is a fact of history that is staring us in the face.

We’ve got to reform Islam, because sadly enough, muslim people put their stupid faith above the laws of the country and above the lives of the community they inhabit and that is why they cannot be trusted. We need to teach them some manners and reformation will go a long way towards that.

And this is the Basic Truth that we all must spread widely, even though it is not Politically Correct to even admit this Truth to ourselves, in this snowflake era of political correctness and of the Democratic party being infested with islamic radicals and muslim extremists in all positions of power.

So carry on and say it to the wider pubic, and spread it in the popular forums of Social Media and Public Discourse… because people need to hear tis reality.

So now it is time that we become again aware that History is not made by those who watch the Telly to get their news from the Mass Media establishment elites that want to whitewash the terror attackers… but history is made by the Strong Ones because these muslim people are all losers, midgets, and are pray for death instead of Life.

And as far as any kind of Muslim leadership is concerned — they are lost, because nobody has emerged to do the reform….

Stature in history is measured by some as the height of a statue on a plinth, the western idea of a great man of history by how quickly people will defend what can only be described as savage. One day perhaps, instead of heroes standing on a pile of corpses to deliver their version of a better world, we might look to others as a model to follow.

Yet too many are tied  to the idea of an apocalypse to solve humanities woes. One which some pray for, and some kill for. But it is certainly an ideological battle just the same, and who will win remans to be seen.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.05.38 PM

Is this a case of mass delusion like the Muslim people ultimately praying to a bit of stone from a reputed meteorite that landed a couple of Thousand years ago in the sands around Mecca? Or is this the power of the words of the prophet that wrote the Koran as a way to live life for the use of his friends in Medina and for the desert dwellers managing their goats in the wilds of Arabian deserts?

The fact of the matter is that we don’t know. We really do not know…

But we need something more than religion or the enlightenment of reason to get past this mass delusion called Muslim faith as is done by a billion people worldwide. Still the drones in the sky, and the knives of ISIS on the ground, are not going to deliver that brave new world. Rather being sick at the destruction humanity is capable of delivering in the name of their vision, is what we need.

The world is worth fighting for, and so the fight for what makes it a better world goes on. But our victories are always interspersed with defeats and there are no guarantees about any long lasting Victorious resolution of this vast conflict between our Civilization and those Barbarians who believe onslaught road bloody mayhem.

If history shows us anything, it really does matter who wins.

The mass media is an apologist for ISIS… but You don’t have to be.

Still do you ever wonder why the mass media is so deluded?

Think about it and you’ll find the answer yourself… to this important question.

Still we’ve got to look at the other important influence on Africa…

And let us look also at how the singularly focused Chinese national effort is enslaving Africa in it’s entirety to another Asiatic dogma: Chinese Communism, while at the same time assisting Islamic fundamentalists lea cross the world to attack our freedom and our very lives and those of our children because they think that this proxy war effort can make them more powerful by causing us to bleed all the time form the myriad of thousands of terror induced deaths, and injuries amongst our young ones — and by confusing us about who is the ultimate enemy that we face today.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 12.51.40 PM

And what is Africa’s growing subservience to China going to bring forth for it’s people in the near term and what in the long term?

So now let’s turn to China, because today is the time when China’s growth is responsible for much of the world’s economic dynamism, and the Chinese seek new markets and geopolitical spheres of influence in order to maintain this growth, because frankly the West is saturated with Chinese plastic chochkes, dolls, imitations of other people’s designs, intellectual property infringement, fake products, and worse than all of the above — plastic rice, plastic meats, plastic vegetables, fake & highly toxic milk, and other toxic foodstuffs.

For Africa besides being inundated with all the plastic shit and the toxic foodstuffs from China — there is also the huge concern over China’s illegal harvesting of all the protected animal species from Africa and from everything that Africans produce — including forced child labor, human organ harvesting, and indiscriminate slave labor.

And here is where the pot finds it’s top — because the Islamic slavers turn over to the Chinese factory managers — all the slaves they can gather and then the “ultra humane” Chinese Communists “helping” the backwards black Africans, stick these slaves in giant factories that are in reality prison labor camps. And they use them until they die in order to produce more useless plastic things for the Westerners by harvesting the African slaves’ ultra cheap labor. Meanwhile the economic statistics skew the fact that the African slaves represent the cheapest labor force the world has ever seen — and present the product of the Chinese in Africa as part of the African GDP thus showing an erroneous economic growth.

Erroneous because as you might recall form the American slave experience that was perpetuated by the plantation politics of the Democratic party of the Confederate South — that type of economic growth is a mirage.

Yet nobody is speaking about this vast problem of Slavery in Africa today — and perhaps we need a new Abraham Lincoln to emerge in Africa, and gain power in order to liberate the Slaves. Indeed if history repeats itself this is what is needed once again: An African native reincarnation of old Abe Lincoln to act as the Liberator and the Emancipator that can turn the Chinese Slavers away from their country….


Now we have to see the evils of China as being exported to a fairly primitive Africa without regard for it’s people. That is also the solidarity amongst the Socialist and the Communist nations that is so prevalent in basket cases like Zimbabwe where the bankrupt state itself is providing the slaves for the Chinese factories and for the Chinese plantations and industrial agriculture slave factories. And all that food the African slaves produce is strictly grown for China’s export markets. Not a single bushel of corn or rice or maize is given to the Zimbabwean or to the African people. All those millions of metric tonnes of food is exported under African labels to the mature and wealthy markets of the developed world. This slave produced food makes it’s way to America and to Western Europe and of course to China.

What a fvckin Karma this food must have…

Slave grown crops, and slave produced foods, are already large part of our diet — since we choose to support the crazy Communists of the Chinese government by buying up their crazy production — while they undermine us daily, and take away the freedom of so many human beings.

Yet today not many Western Mass Media outlets have taken to publishing these reports urging caution because of China’s expanding influence and it’s terribly ugly and barbaric slave owning, un-Christian, and peculiarly ugly pre-colonial exercise of naked and aggressive Chinese power in Africa.

The few reports that have come out, have tried to sidestep the slave problem and instead have only criticized China’s neo-colonialism initiatives, like the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) – established in 2000, as the symbol of China’s moves towards Africa, and of it’s infrastructure development involving loans to Africa’s developing countries, under projects like the Southern African part of the “One Belt – One Road” concept proposed in 2013 and actively envisioned today in China’s modern version of the forbidden city…

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 9.23.11 AM

At the same time that China is lording it over Africa — the expectations of the Chinese Aid recipient countries have surged in recent years, with more tan 90% of the money pumped into Africa from China going to the Political Entrepreneurs and their posses. Clan loyalty is what makes all the African dictators and pseudo-democratically elected presidents possible and the same clan corruption and nepotism is what keeps Africa in abject poverty. The Political Entrepreneurs are stealing all the money coming in to Africa from China’s self serving largess and they deposit it in their Swiss bank accounts thus making the capital unavailable to their people, and thus exacerbating the dire economic situation of their countries, driving more people to slavery and keeping these countries in that vicious circle of poverty despair, and their central banks printing out money that causes inflation and then hyperinflation as is the case of Zimbabwe where the Chinese are busy constructing vast prison factories for the slaves to operate and turn out Zimbabwean-Chinese products and foodstuffs.

“This the fruit of the amazing cooperation between two Socialist governments in the interests of the people. Amazing cooperation between Mr Xi and Mr Mugabe for the benefit of their respective people” — CNN news network

Really now. If you believe that shite, then I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn New York.

And a steel tower looking like an obelisk in Paris along with a palace in London. By the way, the palace in question comes stocked with a Queen…

Just so you know.

Screen Shot 2017-05-21 at 9.16.52 AM

Notice the thin Hitler mustache this monstrous Dictator wears on his ugly mug, and you can infer where this revolutionary African Socialist and the best friend of the Chinese Communist President Xi, is drawing his ideological and sartorial origins from…

Do we also need to mention here the deep racism that the Chinese people have against everybody but especially against the Black people of Africa?

Methinks that you know all that already.

Africa today is still a “basket case” beset with AIDS, civil wars, poverty, and other problems — and the much ballyhooed transformation to a glossy brochure for the “continent of hope” enjoying impressive rates of economic growth and development has not quite arrived on the eight o’clock train form London yet…

A full 40% of it’s people are infected with the AIDS virus and their governments are even more corrupt than in the past now that they have the Chinese who speak that language quite well — to rely upon, and do munificent business with.

Therefore that particular “train” of economic growth and development for Africa, is still held up at the station in Piccadilly Circus. Indeed the wheels seem to have come off. So no ten o’clock Express is going to be arriving into Zimbabwe’s capital Harare central station, anytime soon. The English people and increasingly the Americans too, have recognized that feeding the cancer of corruption through foreign aid that lines up the pockets of the ultra-corrupt leaders as it makes the round trip too the Swiss bank numbered accounts — is not working at all for the African people and have stopped feeding that particularly virulent Cancer. But the Chinese have seen this as an opportunity and have seized the momentum to build a Chinese system of governance in China because they like that system since it mirrors their own. After all the true Empress of China is corruption. And Corruption is the scheme that they back as their Leader’s power rests upon, the constant enrichment of the corrupt Chinese officials as well. Corrupt kleptocrats from Africa and from China along with political entrepreneurs of the African states and clans, fully understand each other rather — and are doing robust business together, since they speak the same language.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.39.39 PM

So because of that particularly virulent form of State Corruption and Political Entrepreneurship that is shared between the Chinese and the African leaders — we have come to see today’s African nations as the basket cases of Kongo, Zimbabwe, and Sudan, to be the best examples of the Chinese benevolence towards Africa.

And, above all else, their leaders, have come to see the relationship with China in an extremely positive light because of it’s profit generating in their numbered Swiss accounts. These idiots go so far as to express their pleasure towards China in official communiques, where they describe the Chinese slave factories in their countries, as an exemplary engine for economic growth and development for their Citizenry and as they count it towards their GDP.  While in reality the China-Africa relationship represents the greatest noose in the necks of the poor African people and the bonds of slavery — but admittedly it is also an engine of economic growth for the Swiss banks and for the smart Swiss banker-wankers that manage the whitewashing of the dirty Chinese monies as they turn them into legitimate products of Political Entrepreneurship.

Admirable eh?

A true democratic practice like Mugabe’s liberation of the slaves, or China’s human organ extraction from the children of Christian missionaries and Falun Gong practitioners, or even El Chappo’s philanthropy, or maybe they conduct their business of helping people just like the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti operations, and Clinton Global Initiative for Africa, has done.

After all it was the Clinton Initiative that advised the Chinese on how to deal with Falun Gong in a humane way… and see how that morphed into what was foisted upon the African nations as an initiative of dirty political operators who use a far worse business model than the worst ones used by any unreasonable Kleptocrat Leader, Corrupt Government, or even a dirty philanthropic foundation would ever do.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.39.06 PM

And as commodity prices have climbed with the expansion of the Chinese economy — this official corruption and political entrepreneurship has ben accounted for and has thus bolstered the GDP in the African countries, in double digits since the 2000s. In 2009, China became the largest trading partner of the African continent, importing large quantities of resources, and investing huge sums in development. The rate of growth of the Chinese economy has certainly slowed over the past two or three years and imports from Africa have also been affected by the slump in international resource prices. However, the respect and confidence in China that has been built has not suffered.

The infrastructure that China has built in Africa is one of the main factors for China’s popularity in African nations. Amid the increase in new harbors, roads, and airports, railways in particular have been a massive bonus not only for the governments of the countries on the receiving end of loans, but also for the people of those countries. With a history of more than forty years, Chinese railway construction in Africa dates back to the Tanzania-Zambia Railway (TAZARA) in the early 1970s. Starting with the Ethiopia-Djibouti railway and urban transportation networks in each country, there are still now many projects underway, building international railroad networks linking the countries in East Africa.

These trains are not the high-speed TGV or bullet train variety. For landlocked nations, however, rail facilitates the transport of a wide range of agricultural products and primary resources to harbors in a fraction of the time and in much large quantities than was the case in the past. In addition, the local railroads open up business opportunities for small merchants and farmers who have no means of transport. Certainly, it may be the case that Chinese construction companies hardly ever use local labor, but bring engineers and workers with them from China. However, the lines provide support for everyday life and this has left people with a positive impression.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.37.50 PM

The railways built during the colonial period were constructed for the convenience of colonial entrepreneurs, and most are in a state of disrepair because they were not maintained after independence. Airline routes in Africa often connect major cities with the former suzerain states, and Africans who want to visit a neighboring country may have to transit via Europe. It is not likely that anyone draws comparisons between airplanes and the current local train systems as means of transport, but if vestiges of Eurocentrism linger even in the airline routes, it is not difficult to imagine that Africans would welcome Chinese business capital building infrastructure for local people.

Personally, I believe that the apologists and the liberals seeking respect for China, should also include respect for kleptocracy and corruption as well as elements of “aspiring towards the development state” as a permanent basket case reality, that allows one to beg, steal, or borrow, in order to enrich their ‘anonymous” Swiss numbered accounts. And although China is still a developing nation, and a strong, authoritarian state — it has also built an economy that in some measure helps the lives of its citizens, winning recognition for its success, and perhaps this has given people some hope. Then it is hardly surprising that the “developmental state” which links national integration with economic development, is one of the ideals for leaders of countries that were not easily able to deliver on talk of national unification at the time of their independence.

Today’s black African slaves work the underground coal mines and the surface mines, as well as the prison factories and the slave plantations — same as they have done for the Arabs for the past 1400 years…

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.42.29 PM

Methinks that this slave labor output and economic products does not qualify for inclusion inside the GDP of any modern state but in Africa it is the greatest hidden asset, and in academic circles one notes that the origins of the description of the “development state” are found in Japan after the Second World War… under the MacArthur administration. Of course, today’s African countries welcome some investment from Japan, but as Japan seeks neutrality, accountability, and transparency — they are not anywhere as welcomed as China is in Africa today.

And their explanation for that is that as long as investments provide business opportunities, African Kleptocrat Tribal Leaders, believe it is better to deal with the real problems of having lots of options of where to stash their money in overseas Tax Heavens than just having the white gloved Swiss bankers handle their personally stolen sovereign wealth from other nations’ aid package for the African people’s development.

What a mess…

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.43.52 PM

From the Chinese perspective, the African continent is the last stop for the One Belt, One Road concept, because they see the black Africans as a step up from monkeys hanging from the trees — but since that is not a politically correct representation of their sincere Socialist fraternization with the common people of Africa — they simply treat them as SLAVES. Well done My Chinese brethren…

May some day you get your just deserts for that act of stupidity, and then please don’t bother coming to me back crying: “Karma is a Bitch.”

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.39.39 PM

Since the economic reforms in 1979 and the emergence of the concept of the “socialist market economy” in the 1990s, the market (read: demand) has become the essential growth factor for the economy in China. The One Belt, One Road is a structure that will generate new demand to counter the excess supply capacity of the Chinese economy. Even if the loans become uncollectable, China does not need to recoup its capital outlays at this stage.

Mining rights for natural resources, harbor leases, and other settlements in kind are far more useful to the future of the Chinese economy, and Mr Mugabe’s offerings of plentiful Free Labor from his hand picked slaves tip the balance on the favor of this abundant cooperation between the two Totalitarian and anti-human rights dictatorships.

Same as all the other corrupt African leaders who court Chinese totalitarian development for the Black Continent — they envision a “belt and road” future that holds the African people hostage to the Chinese Communism while themselves line the road to Switzerland with Yuan and Renminbi banknotes.

African leaders holding hands together with China’s Premier, in order to enslave the whole of African and perhaps the World… is not a pretty sight.

Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 1.41.00 PM

Common criminals holding hands… to get the goods of Africa including it’s people and turn them all into slaves amid plantation politics like the policies of the confederate Democratic party in the US a couple of centuries ago…

Even if such “goodies” are abandoned, China can score a significant win in the long term if it can form a renminbi economic zone and provide the groundwork for building a world where international trade does not rely on the U.S. dollar.

To make this economic zone a more comfortable place for everyone, it is crucial to start efforts early to get the message across to China that a unilateral hegemony and support of the slave trade and it’s utility for prison factories and jail plantations of Slaves, do not represent a good policy for Pax-Sinica.

Yet as things change and as the Arc of the Universe shifts along towards Justice — surely the next Ebola epidemic or the variant of SARS, will erupt inside China and in the Arab lands — instead of Africa, because Karma seeks Retribution to the rightful owners of the dirty deed of Slavery and chicken generally tend to go home to roost…

To be continued….

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 22, 2017

The Microsoft Attack against Dr Churchill

Indeed one would think of Winston Churchill as indestructible.

Screen Shot 2017-05-15 at 11.41.00 AM

And yet the same can be said of myself who have in my own times survived a few Assassination attempts myself…

The most recent assassination attempt against me took place inside the Microsoft headquarters in Seattle’s Redmond district where I was giving a speech on the 28th of February earlier this year.

That is when an unruly crowd of Microsoft snowflakes broke my speech into a riotous and ridiculous attack and they ushered me into a dark corridor where they banged my head against the solid post and against the wall a couple of times, thus causing me a serious hematoma on the left temple on the outer brain, and a serious condition that already has incapacitated my left side of the head and face, and continues to weaken the whole left side of my body.

Now this requires some special form of brain surgery to remove the blood clotting and compressing the brain — but we will manage this to the best of our ability and with whatever help my good Doctors can provide. Yet God willing and with your prayers we shall overcome. We shall overcome because we have work to do and we will not stop until we succeed in our pursuit of the United States election for the Senate seat on behalf of the Washington State. We will wrestle that seat away from the control of the corrupt liberals and will restore it to the Conservative majority that is at this moment making this country Great Again.

But first we have to alleviate that brain hematoma condition soonest, because otherwise I might get reduced to a situation similar to that of the Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking who is on a wheelchair immobile and having to speak through a tube that translates breath to words…

As a matter of fact, fortune might have saved me that awful day when I was set upon by the rabbit dingoes of the Microsoft…

And indeed fortune smiled upon me that day because the blunt trauma to the head resulted to an immediate concussion and a contusion, and I slept for almost 24 hours straight between bouts of vomit and lethargy. But I gather that fortune was upon me because my first visit the Doctor did not detect the Concussion and no X-Rays were requested although I was not very ambulatory and thus had to stay in bed for days and weeks on end. And only when my face started fully dropping and my eyes could neither open nor close — I sought specialist Doctor’s advise and Emergency Care.

This is the end of the devious fortune that smiled upon him and I wish to not have any more of her supine charms anymore.

Same as old Winston, enjoyed this diffident Fortune that she blessed us squarely upon the head, (literally) and put us into a comma. He from jumping from the bridge to escape his pursuers, and me escaping running into a dark corridor to escape the pounding from my pursuers — both of us running for our life.

It is thus his Life and mine that were spared many times over, from destruction, and from certain yet untimely death. A good break if you can catch it. But the blunt trauma to the head makes me now look like the Quasimod or the hunchback of Notre Dame de Paris — but that is Life.

Here is my ugly mug as it looks today, after this dastardly and treasonous Microsoft organized politically motivated and racist attack by the subhumans and by the CEO of that silly company an Islamist named Satya Nadela who is coming as a simpleton and a hateful snowflake engineer, who migrated from the horrors of Mumbai in the old Raj subcontinent of India.

Look and weep:

Screen Shot 2017-05-16 at 9.40.03 PM

Yet sad as this might seem — we have hope for recovery after a long treatment period and a certain type of brain surgery….

Yet to allow this assassination attack to take place inside the global headquarters of Microsoft because the Microsoft CEO Mr Satya Nadela refused to offer any form of Security to this Candidate for the United States Senate Dr Pano Churchill, for his official speech is unconscionable. And to go after the attack and further injure the leader of the American Political party — the Lincoln Party — is criminal. Because all of Mr Satya Nadela efforts today are at hiding this terrible attack under the collective power that Microsoft’s wealth and Public Relations propaganda machine can buy along with the buy out of the Redmond Corrupt Police department. It’s a nice job to have to be a CEO of a powerful and extra wealthy company that hides it’s wealth in international tax heavens and hates our President all the while pretending to be a good guy whereas in reality they are a daft champion of Anti-Americanism and are full of Hate for our Liberty and Democracy.

Because what else do you call those hate mongers, the Islamists, and the misguided Socialists, who rule Microsoft, but clueless and haters? And what about the infamous MicroSerfs that attacked me in order to stop my speech, and in order to silence this defender of Liberty and the staunchest Supporter of our own American Constitution in this State?

They are all sadly lost to us because they believe that hate and violence might solve anything today and want to divide our country to pieces. They sincerely want to finance the sedition effort of the five Western States, and think this idiotic plan will succeed. All because their candidate didn’t manage to steal the elections…. Sad tools and daft binary individuals with out a trace of imagination or innovation amongst them.

Yet this is the leadership of Microsoft today and hope that somebody from the Board of Directors is listening because this is actionable intelligence to fire the CEO and all his minions and start from scratch with honest hard working Americans unwilling to become the Slave Farm that Microsoft has become with the thousands of contract workers form the subcontinents. That is how the Islamist have taken control of this company.

Perhaps time to change that… and maybe the IRS should also look into their nefarious tax avoidance practices and the Homeland Security and the Immigration Service ought to look into how they break all the Immigration laws customarily and that is why they fight the President’s Immigration Executive Order.

But the violence they loosened upon me at the time of my speech in their headquarters will surely be their undoing because we have watchful Leaders in command of our country and our Justice department is now getting ready to attack them and the corrupt Redmond Police department with a strong investigation.

And my advise to the snowflake Mr Satya Nadela is to be careful because Americans are just and honest people and things change fast here just like the changeable weather of Seattle. And as soon as the American people find out that their preferred Conservative yet Independent US Senate Candidate for the State of Washington, has been gravelly injured and yet remained alive and is fighting — they will flock to my defense.

Mr Nadela, methinks that your days sabotaging our country are coming to a swift end…

Count my words little man of Microsoft:

Screen Shot 2017-05-16 at 10.42.32 PM

And I have no doubt that honest to goodness American people will start a massive boycott of Microsoft and cause the end of that terrible regime of Islamic fundamentalists within our country.  All in the cause of Liberty and Democracy and while I was giving a political speech bout Innovation having being invited under false pretenses by this Microsoft company leader, who does not tolerate the American Constitution that guarantees our basic human rights, our Freedom of Speech, and our basic freedoms.

In the hands of these fools I suffered a betrayal and a dastardly attack against my Life. But for the Grace of God I would by now be dead… Yet providence summoned me and saved me, and I only have God to Thank for my being alive today. And I have the Good Doctors to also thank for a good survival outlook, and a positive prognosis. As for the future — we yet don’t know what it holds for this new Guardian of another “Thermopylae” today — but I assure you that I will run for the United States Senate position of the Washington State this elections of 2018 and we will win. Count on it.

Because if anything I am a fighter and as long as  have a breath of Life inside of me — I will fight to win and to represent the American people and all the Washingtonians fully and well. Honest Politicking is what we need and not more corrupt politicians like Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell that all they do are to say Yes to a corrupt DNC and their lobbyists that line up their pockets with ill gotten gabs that make them store bought politicians like so many that we need to eject form the Capitol in order to drain the swamp…

And I promise you that I will fight on, because very much like my grandfather Winston — I am made of stern stuff and of a strong disposition. And of a certain temerity that allows me to withstand these barbaric attacks from the Asiatic forces of darkness, even when those hateful forces are located in Redmond Washington and are part of the Leadership of a famous company called Microsoft. A company that has certainly lost it’s way, it’s rudder, and it’s compass, in the hands of an Asiatic simpleton who is just a leader of the horde and who has no relation to our American values, nor any understanding of our Constitution, and certainly no respect for our Liberty.

Indeed it is a terrible thing to witness the distraction, and the loss of direction, of an once proud company like Microsoft. What a shame…

Yet my fortune to be alive today after suffering such an attack is the unique and special connection, between grandfather Winston Churchill, and grandson Dr Pano Churchill, above all else. Our long term survival against all odds… unites us firmly, and our resilience against assassination attempts from our haters and those Nazis, Islamists, or Communists, unites us even further into the fabric of Democracy and Liberty amongst this group of select Patriots that guard the Republic willingly giving our own blood to nourish the tree of Freedom for all Americans and indeed for all Free people of the Free world.

Of course Winston Churchill encountered death up close and personal many times, same as me, but his “times” were far more graphic, involving horses and swashbuckling, and due to length of time passed since — they also have become a lot more public, because his secrets can be revealed today, since the Official Secrets Act only lasts so long…

Winston was larger than life and whether he dodged bullets grazing his head, or hitting his tent when asleep, or even hitting his horse, and his comrades – he always seemed to escape with his life. Not exactly unscathed, but he was always wounded more deeply from those betrayals small and large, arising from those errant friends, or those amongst his intimate circle of friends, and trusted colleagues — than any wound the enemy inflicted upon his body.

Same as me now that I reflect that the betrayal of my Microsoft colleagues to guide me unsuspecting and without any security into the trap full of venomous snakes of the human variety — is the biggest betrayal there is and the deepest wound against my mortal coil…

Indeed Winston same as yours truly — hated betrayal, more than any other vice in life. And he did so because he had felt the sting of betrayal far too often in his multifarious life…

And so have I hated this betrayal — same as this instance where I was lured to give a speech inside Microsoft Headquarters under false pretenses only to be betrayed and driven to bear my cross up to my “Golgotha” where my persecutors sought to nail me upon the metaphorical cross of a slow and painful death due to blunt head trauma that acts like a delayed fuse bomb in the brain.

What bastards and losers can live inside the skin of seemingly ordinary Microsoft employees that are all MicroSerfs, self haters, and zombies against Liberty… in the placid and green campus in the little company town of corrupt Redmond city, next to Seattle…

Amazing betrayal of public trust.

And the fact of the matter is this gets worse because the Redmond Police department is steeped into this corruption like a drunk with his head n the toilet. Being a company town Microsoft dictates to the Police department all of their actions and of course it causes them to cover this thing up and to not even arrest the named attackers some two months after this dastardly assassination attempt occurred inside Microsoft headquarters.

Maybe now the new FBI director will get involved to solve this and maybe the Justice department will handle this delicate matter of an assault against the heart of our Democracy…


But at least the prognosis is not of an imminent death… Not yet… Unless … the fortune withdraws her protections and God figures he don’t need me anymore. But I am sure that is not to be the case yet.

So stay strong my friends. State strong, and keep me in your prayers.

As for the Doctors here is an example off my current state of affairs:

As you can see I have serious enemies not only because I am a legend in my time, but because I run for the position of United States Senator on behalf of this State of Washington that I have chosen to make my home since the time I went to the local college here the University Washington.

Now please imagine, that somehow I have managed to survive all these incredible attacks emanating from the sore losers of the Democratic party apparatchiks who fashion themselves to be fascists like the criminals that run North Korea across the Pacific today.

And it is a fitting metaphor because North Korea targets Seattle with nukes, and yet we have to remain defenseless without even a simple Civil Evacuation Plan. We have to wait the nuclear bombs in our homes because the faulty liberals that run this State as a Soviet state for the last fifty years have decreed that we should have no protection from Nuclear Armageddon lest we anger our North Korean friends.

Imagine that… We have no escape plan, and certainly no evacuation plan, nor any defense plan — because the Dems have passed a stupid law that forbids us from making any public plans for this eventuality…. claiming that any defensible plan against a nuclear attack form North Korea, will be a detriment to Peace.

This is how crazy and mentally unstable as well as violent, the various mobs of liberal haters have become…

As a further example of liberal hypocrisy and violence, here is a story today about a Tennessee woman, who was apparently discontent with her congressman’s remarks at a town hall held at the University of Tennessee-Martin, did what any normal, curious and courteous constituent would do to have her followup concerns addressed — she chased his car down, forced him off the road and started screaming and banging on their windows. You guessed it. The congressman, David Kustoff, is a Conservative. And indeed a full on Republican. And for Conservatives as well as for Republicans, all over the United States, it is open season and it is getting positively dangerous out there. This particular story ended with Wendi Wright, 35, being arrested and charged with felony reckless endangerment. And the specifics of her charges come down to this: She allegedly chased Kustoff and his aide, Marianne Dunavant, in her car as they drove from the town hall event, ultimately intimidating them to the point that they pulled into the driveway of somebody they knew. That’s when Wright got out of her car, approached theirs, and began to scream and rant, pound their windows and, at one point, reached inside their vehicle. She also stepped in front of their car to prevent the congressman and his aide from leaving, police said.  Wright ultimately left the scene — but was apprehended after she posted details of the incident to her Facebook page. And it’s that little facet of the story that seems most remarkable. Think about it: Ms violent snowflake Wright was so proud of her behavior that she put it out there for the world to see. She felt no shame; no need to hide her actions. The question we need to ask is this: Is Wright demented? Or just an average Democrat in the Trump era?

Certainly, the atmosphere in the country has turned much more accepting of violence as a form of leftist political protest in recent months — since the rise of President Donald Trump, in fact. College campuses are filled with angry, ignorant students influenced by politically progressive and Marxist professors who don’t mind tossing a rock or two at building windows whenever a conservative speaker comes to town. The streets are filled with anarchy-minded individuals who seem to take whatever cause of the day — women’s rights, for example, or climate change — and turn it into a vicious anti-Trump drumbeat that ends with cars ablaze, people injured and general mayhem inflicted. The congressional halls of Democratic offices are filled with calls to impeach Trump, finding an actual impeachable offense be danged. And the media, the ever complicit media, don’t mind rising from the mud, when opportunity presents, to join the anti-this, anti-that fray as well.

Just a few days ago, police in West Virginia’s Capitol arrested a journalist, Daniel Ralph Heyman, who they said was “aggressively breaching the Secret Service agents to the point where agents were forced to remove him a couple of times from the area,” ABC News reported, citing an officer. Apparently, Heyman was also allegedly “causing a disturbance” by yelling questions at Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price — stupid questions, no less. Heyman, in a followup interview with the Associated Press, said he was “arrested after he repeatedly asked Price about whether domestic violence is a pre-existing condition under the Republican health care proposals and got no response,” ABC reported. Hey, Heyman: You probably got no response because there was no response to give. The question was aimed at inciting an emotional backlash; it had no basis in logic or fact. Heyman, of course, has now become the cause celebre for the media to talk about the First Amendment — from an anti-Trump point of view, of course. The whole fiasco could have been easily avoided. Price, just a short time later, held a public news conference where he fielded journalists’ questions. In other words: Heyman could’ve waited his turn. He just wanted to stir trouble. All this, meanwhile, comes on the heels of an appeal by a Huffington Post editor-at-large for leftists to simply hound those of the pro-Trump camp by following Republican politicians to their places of work, places of dining, places of living, and stand outside and protest and demand answers. Answers to what? Apparently, to why they’re Republicans, refusing to vote Democratic.

Yet this is the tone and atmosphere of the country right now. And it’s one created and fueled solely by the left. So what’s a good Republican to do to stay safe?

The easy answer, of course, would be to hide and go underground — to keep quiet, to cower and run. But this is what the left wants. And why should they win? The voters, after all, have spoken.

No, what’s called for in the face of these bullies is to fight harder. Bullies don’t back down unless they’re met with a force that’s to be reckoned with. And how do you best fight lying, deceptive, argumentative, angry, irrational, violent socialist-minded partisans with intent on corrupting the Constitution and destroying the greatness of America? With truth. With courage. With the full armor of God — including the breastplate of righteousness, shield of faith, and sword of the spirit.

In the face of such power, the permanent and indefensible evil these lunatic leftists represent — can only flee in panic. After all snowflakes melt under the scrutiny of the Sun and the strong warm light of day.

And so do buttercups… and assorted vermin.

They all scurry and melt away when the light shines upon them…

Screen Shot 2017-04-29 at 8.28.44 PM

In another story today, the sense of a divided America, is growing as do the attacks against us from the violent haters who masquerade as Democrats and Socialists, or Islamists and Feminists… because that is what represents my Microsoft experience where the attackers have continued their harassment against me even after their violent physical attack. And to this day they still attack me with various cyber attacks against my servers and websites, and they besmirch my good name through Libel that is directed by the all powerful Microsoft PR and legal machine. Imagine a large public Company attacking a candidate for the United States Senate and using Libel by sullying my good name through various libelous attacks and through their stopping the investigation of the Redmond Police department which they fully own and control. And by spreading malicious rumors about me and even using their wealth to buy my legal reps, and cause them to betray me, they cause further harm, and injury to me, same as they do through their spreading of misinformation against me. Indeed Microsoft has spread so many nasty rumors against me in an effort to discredit me, and cause me further loss of face, and business value, that they publicly libel me even in places and venues where I have speaking engagements scheduled for the future. Of course as you would expect, this brazen and systematic hateful libel action, against an incapacitated victim of a violent attack inside their Headquarters will not go unpunished. Because as soon as I recover some of my strength – we will report them to the FBI and to the Justice department. And we will also start a boycott against this nasty Company because they have been inimical to Justice and the American way. And that is why I call upon all of you, to pass this bit of news forward; so that we can alert the American public to their barbaric hateful ways, of libeling the brave amongst us — hoping to bring us down to their sorry level of slithering snakes and venomous haters.

Sadly here in Seattle it is a world full of wickedness and hate, that we have to live in -amongst these passive aggressive bipolar and hateful liberals who are always under the influence of the marijuana that is the legal herb today. And all the weak snowflakes smoke, vape, inhale and ingest cannabis in myriad different ways of getting seriously stoned and mentally jacked-up to the point that they go crazy and are violent and totally unaccountable of their actions. And indeed all of Microsoft is a big Cannabis factory where just walking out  in the green grass amongst the buildings, you can smell and even taste the weed, and you get an instant contact “High” just by breathing the air. Because nothing else is emanating in that Corporate Campus besides the smell of mental rot that cannabis smoking represents, and the liberal mindset of militant Islamists and America haters. Never mind that its a felony to be smoking marijuana in public — the Redmond Police department is owned by Microsoft and they never arrest anyone there. As a matter of fact they are also probably stoned and the Police people there really don’t give a damn. So keep on smoking MicroSerfs — you are really getting smarter by the minute… But as you are lost amidst the smoke of thousands and thousands of puffers and losers out there like your CEO please keep in mind that there is Justice at the end of the Rainbow and as the Arc of the Universe tends towards justice — your time for you just deserts has finally arrived.

As for the CEO Satya Nadela, he is a crooked person just as his Presidential candidate Hillary and just as corrupt. Clearly the fish stinks form the head on down in the company town of Redmond where the Mayor and all the City Council as well as the head of the Police department are all in the payroll of Microsoft in ways direct and indirect… Never have I seen a greater case of public Private Corruption that this nasty swamp of Microsoft and Redmond City and Police department. Time for the new head of the FBI to come around and clean this smelly stable full of bullshit.

Yet I chose to go speak there willingly, because I did not now any of these things n advance. When I agreed to speak at the Microsoft headquarters, I was fully expecting that a regular Microsoft Security detail and Redmond Police department security detail would be present to prevent just such an event from happening.  But apparently the security detail was turned down and neither Microsoft Security, nor the Redmond Police department deployed anyone to protect me. The company failed in a series of ways to protect me. instead the CEO of the company Satya Nadela chose not only to place me in danger because he knew that I am a VIP candidate for the US Senate, and a person that is known to be a strong Speaker for the Constitution, that attracts tons of fanatics — but he also held back any Security personnel from attending my speech inside his Headquarters Campus. And although I am known to be a person that attracts all the “moths” to my high intensity LIGHT emanating from within — the CEO of Microsoft Mr Satya Nadela failed me intentionally, because apparently he wanted to teach me a “lesson” that I will not forget since he is a supporter of my opponent corrupt Ms Patty Murray. Worth noting the Senator Patty Murray is well known because her nephew is the accused pervert Mayor of Seattle Ed Murray, a sick person that has been accused by dozens of men as having molested them when they were mere children. This is the openly gay Mayor Ed Murray, who is not only a nephew of Senator Patty Murray that has put him there through her nepotism, but is also the Mayor who has perverted the youth of the city through his devious sexual ways. And Satya Nadela, the CEO of Microsoft, being himself a snowflake who supports Patty Murray and the Mayor Ed Murray, are all peas of the same pod. and this is what I hear from people near the matter, and around the office of the CEO Satya Nadela of Microsoft. Allegedly the CEO of Microsoft, is also a weed smoker, an islamist, and a snowflake, and as such he doesn’t give a damn about anything other than his personal pleasures and his own libelous behaviour.

So I took an outsized risk without knowing the depth of idiocy prevailing that Company’s leadership and the risk backfired, and I got fully beat up. Yet I take the blame and the obviously heavy injuries from it — because the reason why we take Big Risks is for the support of our Cause. And I am willing to take any amount of risk in the cause of Freedom and Democracy. This is because these things are really worth it. And because I live a Life of principle — in defense of our Republic — I am willing to take all these extraordinary risks, even against my own Life. But I am always heartened by the admonition that through my example millions of others will follow and join the fight on the right side of History, by openly and unashamedly speaking up for Freedom and Democracy, wherever we are called to give a talk, or asked to speak up and exercise our First Amendment rights.

Screen Shot 2017-05-16 at 9.40.03 PM

This practice indeed, makes us even more human, than the opposite, and elevates us to a position far above that of our attackers who occupy the slimy underground. And we will win in the end after all the attacks, because this is our path to Victory, and their path to defeat…

And as Gandhi always said:

“First they laugh at you, then they attack you, and then You win.”

And let’s also remember Winston Churchill’s permanent admonition:

“When you are going through Hell — keep on going.”


Screen Shot 2017-04-30 at 5.50.07 PM

A case in point of how good risk is always taken, is worth remembering, that President Trump has taken an outsized risk by running and wining the Elections of 2016…

Yet crazy people today in this divide country are calling for his assassination like this woman in the story bellow. One has to wonder if enraged liberals are simply unaware that calling for the assassination of the president is a federal crime?

I’m starting to think that might be the case, considering how many are making this very foolish mistake. But, then again, maybe they’re just that dumb…

Joining the bandwagon of what liberals seems to think is an acceptable form of protest, a Kentucky woman over the weekend urged anyone listening and able to assassinate Trump.

Taking to Twitter, Heather Lowrey wrote: “If someone was cruel enough to assassinate MLK, maybe someone will be kind enough to assassinate Trump. #bekind #trump #lovetrumpshate” On e has to wonder if the violent liberal snowflakes are simply unaware that calling for the assassination of the U.S. President is a federal crime?
Same as it is to try to assassinate a US Senate Candidate. It is a federal crime, and not just a local crime…
Yet, I’m starting to think that the Liberals ad their Enablers, the local Democratic politicians that allow them to cause this much unrest, are all totally crazy, considering how many are making this very foolish mistake like the dodos of Microsoft. But, then again, maybe they’re just dumb, stoned, and stupid — due to their voracious consumption of the chronic stoner wed.
So joining the bandwagon of crazy ideas, that liberals seems to think is an acceptable form of protest, a Kentucky woman over the weekend urged anyone listening and able to assassinate Trump — to do so. Taking to Twitter, Heather Lowrey wrote: “If someone was cruel enough to assassinate MLK, maybe someone will be kind enough to assassinate Trump. #bekind #trump #lovetrumpshate”

This Heather clearly a demented and violent snowflake, brought upon her head immediately some severe consequences, in addition to Twitter shutting down her account. First, Heather Lowrey was fired from her job at the burlesque company “Va Va Vixens,” which released the following damning statement against her: “Please, know that we, at Va Va Vixens, do not condone the behavior of Heather Lowrey. She was dismissed the moment we were informed of this incident. We have a zero tolerance policy for such. It’s no secret that we are in the midst of a divided nation. With so much hate and anger in the world, our hope is to be a sanctuary that welcomes all walks of life with open arms. We do not condone hate by any party and will not partake in it. We in no way support negative behavior or malicious intent from anyone.” Second, she received a very scary visit from the Secret Service, which will now investigate her threat. Liberals need to understand that they might not like having Trump as their president, but threatening to kill him is not an acceptable means of protest. Unless they are purposely trying to get thrown in jail, for their troubles…

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 7.00.40 PM

Yet, as political leaders we expose ourselves to considerable risk daily, because risk taking, is what made Donald Trump the President of the United States today, and risk taking is what propels me to seek the Untied States Senate position, on behalf of the great State of Washington in 2018, same as I have tried in 2016… with great results.

So join me to make our campaign for 2018 great and you can also drive those liberals and their islamic militant brethren deep underground where they belong…





Dr Churchill

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 19, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 14)

Today in America we are preoccupied with Russia all over again…

A special prosecutor It seems that the Trump campaign had at least 18 contacts with Russians as Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump’s campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 occasions via calls and emails, during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race…

And he gets criticized for that. As if we don’t want to have any peace in our lives. What is wrong with that picture?

Do we want to have another debacle like that deadly battle of Sebastopol where the “Charge of the Light Brigade?” took place and became the killing fields of Crimea in the Balaclava conflict that saw the original “Valley Of Death” unfolding and taking away the lives of the participants. We don’t have to do this just in order to learn that we need to cooperate with Russia today. We don’t need to have a bloodbath before we wise up. We don’t need to do this again, because we ought to change and start cooperating if we are to join our forces with Russia and fight together to win the dastardly war against the biggest existential enemy we have ever faced.

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 5.56.30 PM

That evil enemy today being the militant Islam… we need all Christians to be together like another Crusade that we have to execute.

And here is where the memory of the Crimean War becomes quite instructive to all of us.

Here is a poem to remind us of the wrongheadedness of fighting against Russia which is a fellow Christian nation. Its a giant foolishness because our division will only serve to bolster the Islamists who at the end of the day they are our common enemy…

Stupid does not begin the describe this position of the Liberal Democrat elites of Washington… and their stupid adherents across the land.

The Charge of the Light Brigade

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.40.27 PM

By Lord Alfred Tennyson

1.Half a league, half a league,
 Half a league onward,
All in the valley of Death
 Rode the six hundred.
“Forward, the Light Brigade!
“Charge for the guns!” he said:
Into the valley of Death
 Rode the six hundred.2.”Forward, the Light Brigade!”
Was there a man dismay’d?
Not tho’ the soldier knew
 Someone had blunder’d:
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die:
Into the valley of Death
 Rode the six hundred.3.Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
 Volley’d and thunder’d;
Storm’d at with shot and shell,
Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of Hell
 Rode the six hundred.

4.Flash’d all their sabres bare,
Flash’d as they turn’d in air,
Sabring the gunners there,
Charging an army, while
 All the world wonder’d:
Plunged in the battery-smoke
Right thro’ the line they broke;
Cossack and Russian
Reel’d from the sabre stroke
 Shatter’d and sunder’d.
Then they rode back, but not
 Not the six hundred.

5.Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon behind them
 Volley’d and thunder’d;
Storm’d at with shot and shell,
While horse and hero fell,
They that had fought so well
Came thro’ the jaws of Death
Back from the mouth of Hell,
All that was left of them,
 Left of six hundred.

6.When can their glory fade?
O the wild charge they made!
 All the world wondered.
Honor the charge they made,
Honor the Light Brigade,
 Noble six hundred.

And this is what the boys of the light Brigade faced and had to fall back after heavy loses. A sustained barrage of well aimed cannon batteries from the Russian positions that were well prepared for any assault.

The light brigade suffered extremely heavy loses and it never recovered during the Crimean conflict… although at that time they offered cover and support to the retreating Turkish Muslim forces.

Do we need to repeat history in order to get to learn that Christians can support each other, against the common enemy the Muslim fundamentalist?

Think about it…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.05.38 PM

The current telephone calls and email interactions of the team of the Elections for Trump in 2016 with the Russians, now form part of the record that is being reviewed by the FBI and congressional investigators who are probing Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election, and are looking into contacts between Trump’s campaign and Russia.

Six of the previously undisclosed contacts described to Reuters were phone calls between Sergei Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, and Trump advisers, including Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser, three current and former officials said.

Conversations between Flynn and Kislyak accelerated after the Nov. 8 vote as the two discussed establishing a back channel for communication between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that could bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations…

In January, the Trump White House initially denied any contacts with Russian officials during the 2016 campaign. The White House and advisers to the campaign have since confirmed four meetings between Kislyak and Trump advisers during that time.

The people who described the contacts, said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far. But the disclosure could increase the pressure on Trump and his aides to provide the FBI and Congress with a full account of interactions with Russian officials and others with links to the Kremlin during and immediately after the 2016 election.

The White House did not verify this report but it is considered true…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.08.38 PM

Separately, a spokesman for the Russian embassy in Washington said: “We do not comment on our daily contacts with the local interlocutors.”

The 18 calls and electronic messages took place between April and November 2016 as hackers engaged in what U.S. intelligence concluded in January was part of a Kremlin campaign to discredit the vote and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump over his Democratic challenger, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.

President Donald Trump joined by Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, Vice President Mike Pence, senior advisor Steve Bannon, Communications Director Sean Spicer and then National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, spoke by phone with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in the Oval Office yesterday and that is a good sign of improved relations and thawing of the tensions…

Those discussions focused on mending U.S.-Russian economic relations strained by sanctions imposed on Moscow, cooperating in fighting Islamic State in Syria and containing a more assertive China, the sources said.

Members of the Senate and House intelligence committees have gone to the CIA and the National Security Agency to review transcripts and other documents related to contacts between Trump campaign advisers and associates and Russian officials and others with links to Putin, people with knowledge of those investigations told Reuters.

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 5.59.00 PM

The U.S. Justice Department said on Wednesday it had appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential campaign and possible collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia. Mueller will now take charge of the FBI investigation that began last July. Trump and his aides have repeatedly denied any collusion with Russia.

In addition to the six phone calls involving Kislyak, the communications described to Reuters involved another 12 calls, emails or text messages between Russian officials or people considered to be close to Putin and Trump campaign advisers.

One of those contacts was by Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch and politician, according to one person with detailed knowledge of the exchange and two others familiar with the issue.

It was not clear with whom Medvedchuk was in contact within the Trump campaign but the themes included U.S.-Russia cooperation, the sources said. Putin is godfather to Medvedchuk’s daughter.

Medvedchuk denied having any contact with anyone in the Trump campaign.
“I am not acquainted with any of Donald Trump’s close associates, therefore no such conversation could have taken place.”

Methinks that we should stop fearing Russia and Putin and lets instead try to find out how we can cooperate together…

Putin Riding a Space Rock

In the conversations during the campaign, Russian officials emphasized a pragmatic, business-style approach and stressed to Trump associates that they could make deals by focusing on common economic and other interests and leaving contentious issues aside, the sources said.

Veterans of previous election campaigns said some contact with foreign officials during a campaign was not unusual, but the number of interactions between Trump aides and Russian officials and others with links to Putin was exceptional.

“It’s rare to have that many phone calls to foreign officials, especially to a country we consider an adversary or a hostile power,” Richard Armitage, a Republican and former deputy secretary of state, told Reuters.

Beyond Medvedchuk and Kislyak, the identities of the other Putin-linked participants in the contacts remain classified and the names of Trump advisers other than Flynn have been “masked” in intelligence reports on the contacts because of legal protections on their privacy as American citizens. However, officials can request that they be revealed for intelligence purposes.

U.S. and allied intelligence and law enforcement agencies routinely monitor communications and movements of Russian officials.

After Vice President Mike Pence and others had denied in January that Trump campaign representatives had any contact with Russian officials, the White House later confirmed that Kislyak had met twice with then-Senator Jeff Sessions, who later became attorney general.

Screen Shot 2015-06-22 at 10.03.37

Kislyak also attended an event in April where Trump said he would seek better relations with Russia. Senior White House adviser Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, also attended that event in Washington. In addition, Kislyak met with two other Trump campaign advisers in July on the sidelines of the Republican convention.

Trump fired Flynn in February after it became clear that he had falsely characterized the nature of phone conversations with Kislyak in late December – after the Nov. 8 election and just after the Obama administration announced new sanctions on Russia. Flynn offered to testify to Congress in return for immunity from prosecution but his offer was turned down by the House intelligence committee.

And that is the whole lot of the Nothing Burger the Liberal Mass Media has become hysterical about…

A few phone calls and some emails.

And a Presidential call from a Leader to a Leader in order to resolve crisis and protect both countries from Militant Islamic Terrorism.

We seem to be forgetting that Russia has been our friend and our staunch ally during the years we fought fascism together…

That’s how we defeated Hitler and that is how we shall defeat Islamic Fundamentalism and the North Korean type of apocryphal and teleological ideology of Communism. Russian help is instrumental in both of these conflicts, and as Winston Churchill often said: “Let the Russian People Rejoice Because We Are Partners In This Conflict Against the Greatest Evil The World has Ever Known.”

Screen Shot 2017-04-30 at 5.48.44 PM

As you can see Winston spoke about being FRIENDS with the Russian people in order to fight against the greatest EVIL the world has ever seen today.

And that EVIL is Islamic Fundamentalism…

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 10.26.49 PM

Who can dispute that the Islamic Militants wish us death and dishonor?

We all know that.

Then why do we treat them with kid gloves?

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 8.28.59 PM

The Munich Security Conference, the yearly Conference for defense ministers of NATO countries, was more notable for the awkward moments, the lack of spark and the unaltered confusion about the new, dizzying realities of President Donald Trump’s administration.

For the Americans and their European counterparts gathered in the Bavarian capital, it was the natural renewal of a now 70-year-old mutual assurance that takes place every time a new President takes office in Washington.

The Americans who flew over for the Munich defense gathering — Vice President Mike Pence, Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly — rehashed bipartisan boilerplate about the transatlantic relationship.

They knew what the Europeans, suddenly in the unprecedented position of worrying about rather than relying on America, wanted to hear. The continental news headlines relayed the intended message of, to paraphrase Pence, America’s “strong support” and “unwavering commitment” to NATO.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.56.30 AM

Another cause of European indigestion is the ultimatum on defense spending delivered by Mattis and repeated by Pence on Saturday. As both said, the new boss in Washington expects the Europeans to spend more on their militaries. Currently, only four NATO countries besides the U.S. meet the bloc’s self-declared 2 percent of GDP defense budget threshold.

More money for arms and men is music to the ears of most defense ministers. Germany’s Ursula Von der Leyen barely could restrain her joy in embracing the U.S. call. A conservative from the ruling Christian Democrats, she’s been fighting a largely losing battle against the junior center-left coalition partners to loosen defense purse strings.

It was more the vagueness of the demand that left Europeans uneasy. A senior European Union official called the 2% goal “a very sketchy, incomplete concept” and certainly not what Brussels wants to see. But he was really speaking for what Berlin wants to see, and if the lagging and spendthrift Europeans don’t open-up their wallets by the end of the year as demanded, and Chancellor Angela Merkel, who said that Germany would build-up its NATO commitment at its own pace — further delay to live up to their commitments — then what is the Trump administration going to do?

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 6.53.13 PM

Who knows what’s next? Would that defeatist attitude, render those collective “hosannas” to Article 5, moot, and irrelevant, and thus push the United States towards the European exits?

Indeed it will. We are with the Brexit crowd — the smart AngloSaxon alliance of English speaking nations and we best prepare for the next conflict to be fought with the allies we can count on, and live the Muslim accommodating globalists, behind. Merkel and Hillary are peas of the same rotten pod — and we have not room for this kind of appeasers of the Muslim threat.

Angela Merkel and Mike Pence, seemed friendly at the meetings, but after Pence visited Dachau, the extermination camp inside Munich that killed hundreds of thousands of Jews and others defined by Hitler’s Germany in 1940’s as undesirable – any sense of US–German camaraderie vanished.

There was also far less for the Germans to take heart from, than the advertised “friendship” in the most closely-watched and first international encounter of the New US Administration that took place in Munich. On Saturday morning, Pence and Merkel sat side-by-side and delivered speeches, one after the other. Her speech was boring and meaningless. Whereas Pence’s speech had the audience’s full and riveted attention.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.06.04 PM

After the talk, the Norwegian secretary-general of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg said: “I don’t believe America First means America Only.” This came from a head of NATO and was said while straining to spin the Trump doctrine positively, and smooth out the most disturbing few weeks in transatlantic relations in recent memory.

Pence repeatedly invoked Trump’s name, and aimed a few higher rhetorical notes about the alliance: “Your struggles are our struggles, your success is our success and, ultimately, we walk into the future together.” Immediately thereafter, one European statesman gave his assessment about the VPs speech and his well rehearsed performance and said: “Vice President Pence sounded Presidential — obviously he is practicing.”

It was what wasn’t included in VP Pence’s speech that dominated the corridor conversations afterward. As more than one person noted, the vice president didn’t utter the words “European Union,” confirming — among the more alarmist — that the Trump administration is out to dismantle the other pillar, besides NATO, of the post-war Western order.

Pence didn’t say anything kind about Merkel, much less pay tribute to the German host, the most powerful European leader who has been a frequent target of Trump’s barbs. That task fell to McCain the previous day. And it was the absence of anything beyond tepid applause that showed how little this crowd took to the socially conservative Republican from Indiana.

A few other Republicans in Munich said Pence was “a bit tone deaf,” in the words of one, giving the kind of American-focused campaign speech he has delivered so often for the past half year. Also trying to reassure, they said that what mattered is that he came and will be in Brussels on Monday.

The man who was on everyone’s mind here was, of course, not even in Munich. Europe’s encounter with President Trump will have to wait until a NATO summit scheduled for late May.

Most people felt fine about the rapprochement between the US and Germany, but scratch a little deeper and the discomfort among the European elites burst out. One cause of it is the whiplash, or massive case of cognitive dissonance, brought on by the things that top figures in the Trump administration said in Brussels, Bonn and Munich this week — and, well, what their boss has been doing and saying his first three weeks in office.

Pleasing the NATO crowd, Mattis and Pence dutifully repeated America’s obligations under Article 5 of the NATO charter, the mutual defense clause, though to some it was remarkable that they even felt they had to.

More questions arise out of this meeting than have been answered.


But how much of the reality represented by the gray-haired, experienced, boring Americans who were here is the reality of the new Trump foreign policy?

Or is it to be found in the potshots taken at the EU and the praise for Brexit, the criticism of Germany, and the frequent nice words for Russia, in the president’s Twitter feed?

Is the new commander-in-chief at the White House “100 percent behind NATO” as U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May claimed at their meeting last month?

Or is the alliance “obsolete” in Trump’s repeated phrase?

“What’s the reality?

All of it.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.04.49 PM

Still the Europeans and also the TRUMP administration’s leading lights on Europe, provided no lasting answers to these questions — and it would be unfair to think they could.

Yet the highlight of Munich this year was the words that were not uttered. Because it was what wasn’t in Pence’s speech that dominated the corridor conversations amongst the elites there…

Maybe they are thinking that the US Vice President didn’t even utter the words “European Union” however the fact that the NATO Alliance on the 15th of February, as the Alliance’s Ministers of Defense assembled at the Nato headquarters in Brussels, in the presence of General James Mattis, Secretary of Defence in the US Trump administration – all eyes were on that table, because of the seriousness of the discussion.

At this meeting the ministers decided that Nato must suspend all of its operations in Syria immediately.

They also agreed that establishing a South Hub and giving, it the mandate of controlling Africa and the Middle East — was a good idea. It was also decided that NATO was to suspend spying flights in Syria effective immediately.

Right from the start of the war that was launched by a joint Washington, London, and Paris, coalition against Syria — NATO has been responsible for the surveillance of the battlefield through its AWACS and its members’ satellites.

The real time advanced intelligence that was continuously gathered, was then immediately filtered and transmitted to jihadist groups, thus allowing them to escape and outwit the Syrian Arab Army, and the Russian Air-Strikes. Indeed we were all working for the Islamic Militants Terrorists — without even knowing it because the Clinton Obama doctrine was to keep the people in the dark and feed them shit through the mass media as if they were simple mushrooms.

But the people cottoned on to their betrayal of the Christian Cause throughout the War, and rebelled against the Mass Media BS and thus shoved them out of office, and made the Clinton News Network (CNN) completely irrelevant and just a mouthpiece of these identity politics as seen by the confused transgender people like Cooper and Maddow and their minions.

The American people want to fight the Muslim barbarians and not to cuddle them, arm them and assist them with our own highly expensive and highly secure intelligence product.

Americans are peaceful people but they can be turned to become warriors of the Faith when their values are assaulted for a very long time.

On withdrawing its AWACS, the NATO Organization made it clear that it is not taking a position in the conflict any longer. Because this is a internecine warfare, which currently puts one Syrian Arab army against another, and then all of them against the Christians and the Kurds, and many others.

Getting out of that Syrian mess and thus avoiding the possibility of even accidentally getting into a heated fight against the Russian Christians — just to favor a bunch of crazed Muslim militants is the pinnacle of stupidity.

Yet that was the Clinton-Obama doctrine that created ISIS and had pushed us to go up against our own kind in the Syrian conflict, and to favor the Muslim Caliphate. Not just stupid — but a treasonous criminal and dastardly policy that only crooked Hillary who was financed by the Saudi Wahabbis could have done in cold blood.

Getting American Military might and muscle work for the ISIS muslim nut jobs is what a Muslim Obama would have approved… but maybe he is not a Muslim and just a fool running an errand for his paymasters. Who knows? And who cares?

Myself just like grandpa Winston hate betrayals of any kind… and the Obama administration represents a giant betrayal for all of us. Keep that in mind next time you think of Madame President and her betrayals and high crimes, and you might feel a certain tinge and a pinching in your heart.

And this memorial remains from the battle of Balaklava in Sebastopol and from the memory of the Charge of the light Brigade though the “Valley of Death” in Crimea — to remind us that when we are divided we certainly fall.

No need to fight the Russians today but there is an imminent need to fight the Muslim threat in all the theaters of war, unless we want to have another useless Crimean War, albeit with nuclear weapons.

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 5.59.20 PM

The Obelisk of Sebastopol.

Therefore the withdrawal of the American & NATO assets from the Syrian region is simply the right thing to do, albeit at a rather late time.

Yet better late than never.

Finally that decision represents the single most necessary effort to stop digging ourselves deeper into the Syrian quagmire and start putting Syria’s Humpty Dumpty back together.  It is the right thing to do even though that action “disgusts” many soft skinned NATO allies, and especially the Germans, because it aggravates their inner Goth & Hun, all over again, that has gotten riled up to present themselves as humanitarian while inviting the war and the refugees to continue their inexorable journey towards Hell. Seems to me the Germans like Hell way too much.

Of course the Germans have benefited mightily from this War and would hate to lose the constantly adding up revenues… and the source of cheap labor that comes to serve them as slaves.

But the wheel of fortune turns and such are the fortunes of war and peace, these days in Munich, in Syria, in Brussels, and especially in Washington DC…

Damn, when will the liberals learn from their mistakes? When will they acknowledge their stupidity, like the liberal icon Lord Palmerston the British Prime Minister who was the leader that plunged us into this idiotic conflict that we came to rue — the Crimean war?


Dr Churchill

In this issue of Strategic Security – President Trump knows well, that European and Global Security is not advanced by Germany’s actions, and her lording it over Europe like a jack booted thug, but rather is undermined by them as it always has been. That is the Churchillian view as well.

As old Winston Churchill said in one of his most acerbic moments:

“The Huns, like the Doberman, will be either at your feet, or at your throat.”

“That is their default state, and there is nothing in between.”

Seems Donald Trump knows that too.

To be continued…

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 18, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 13)

Matters that matter and things that make people’s lives tick are now all in a major state of flux all around the World today. Old ideas crumble and new ones are vying to compete…

Starting from America the home of the Free and the land of the Brave… and spreading throughout the rest of this Earth we are in for an upheaval of the old order of things and the Status Quo is trembling and quaking on it’s boots.

Applecarts are being overturned left and right and the establishment rats are running back to their ratholes for cover. contagion is defeated and the plague of corruption is kept at bay. And these are all signs of good things to come and harbingers of change…. Some people like it and some others not so much. But regardless of their expected reception — change is set to arrive as expected and regularly in the 5 o’clock express…

Change is good. America likes change. Change is good for America. Trump ushers change. … Ergo Trump is good for America.

Those who understand such things, can now clearly see that the election of Donald Trump to the US Presidency has finally enabled the creative destruction necessary for the transition to a more peaceful & prosperous world.

This in turn would unleash all efforts to improve our situation. Sustainability will fly, and so a more equitable distribution of prosperity and wealth through major job creation. This will happen, swiftly and the results will make America Great Again — big league.

Screen Shot 2017-03-05 at 10.03.36 AM

Because Donald Trump’s rise to the White House has shocked many authoritarian Oligarchs and establishment figures as well as wealthy Corporatists all around the world — they have reacted by unleashing an unprecedented attack against they new People’s President. Their reactions are like a new witching, or rather a with-hunt that is awn to crying “FIRE” inside a packed theatre. Indeed we’ve never before seen such virulent Mass Media and Press disinformation campaign full of fake news and clear opposition propaganda. Yet what they don’t understand is that they do this for all the wrong reasons. Yes — the lot of the corrupt Hillary media whores are fighting President Trump for all the wrong reasons, and going after the wrong people, like yours truly and the Lincoln party because we helped bring this President to power with to young College and university students votes that shifted to Donald Trump by the millions after Hillary rigged the primaries and stole the Democratic election from Bernie Sanders. That was the pivotal moment when the stench of Corruption became so overwhelming that the Lincoln party decided to throw it’s total support behind Donald Trump for the Presidency. Along came the million and a half student members that chose to vote for Trump through the Lincoln party over any consideration for crooked Democrats and the extremely crooked Hillary and her militant Islamic consort Huma Abedin, who besides being the spy who passed all the Hillary State Department Secrets to the pervert human dick-pic distributor Anthony Weiner and to her Saudi handlers, along with her Islamic Militant Mother — she has got nothing else to recommend her for not being n Federal prison today.

And instead of this Spy Ring that gave all of our secrets to the Militant Islamic fundamentalists — Comey’s FBI is looking at President Trump’s Campaign personnel for any improbable connections to Russia and Russia’s hacking interest in the US electoral affairs. Yes, Hillary — the Russians made you rig the primary and steal the elections form Bernie Sanders and they are responsible for you being a Big Government socialist idiot.

And much like the idiot that watches the finger when the finger points to the Sun, now the crooked Hillary Dems are again failing to read the mood of the American people and they get stuck at attacking the messenger. That is why the daft rotten Ruffians of Microsoft attacked me in the midst of my Speech at their Redmond WA global Headquarters, and hit me so hard that they damaged my head, and caused Brain swelling and head trauma, that is still bleeding to this day…

That violence is the extent of the intellectual discourse the Microsoft liberal and islamic morons can only get to. Sad as it may be, this is a clear indicator for the level of intelligence that this company has fallen to. Such a low level that, they will go down and resort to violence in order to support their daft and fascist ideology of plantation politics that all the MicroSerfs are firmly bondaged to. Hell – the whole Microsoft is like a Slave plantation full of semi-illegal software drones typing away like the blacks of Gujarat in India being indentured slaves in the brick kilns making mud bricks day after day till they die… And that is why the NeoColonial uncle Tom CEO Satya Nadela is so helpful for maintaining that plantation functioning and full of placid Indian slaves and a few hopeless Americans in between…

So what do you expect from virulent Microsoft Slaves who think that they need to defend their own Slavery?

So these morons are facing indeed a Plato’s Cave dilemma — except they are all MicroSerfs and far too stupid to even know what that means. Obviously only when they get a better education can they start seeing how they are damaging America that they hope to one day become their home…

Yet they want to turn this home into some kind of an Islamic republic because they have just escaped from that particular Gulag of Sharia Law and are missing it… The Pakistans, the Northern Indian muslims and the other Islamic Militants of Microsoft now outnumber the Americans in the employ of this once great company

And that is something the Immigration policy of America needs  to solve…

Yet Trump has to deal with this Immigration policy tat deprives good jobs from Americans and instead gives them to the low wage earners from Muslim countries that happen to work today in Redmond Washington inside Microsoft. And their CEO is exactly a reflection of tat plantation…

Sure these are controversial writings but also the decisions of the President Trump who is the Executive of the country, are also equally controversial. Yet these decisions have to be taken on immigration, on Jobs for Americans, on Climate Change, on Education, On the Environment, and certainly on Energy policy. Yet this triggers the ruffians of Microsoft and all the other plantation companies using undocumented and often times they with companies that employ these Muslim illegal aliens and then contract them out to Microsoft and other companies like that in order to deprive Americans from Good paying jobs. Talk like that and the hysterical Media and the Dems are losing their shit and attack people like me that tell the truth.

And then those of them who have been crying “Wolf” against Trump over and over again and screaming “The Sky Is Falling” so many times over nothing issues like Russia’s interference, hateful hacks, and against the wall that have now came to be seen as total crackpots and worse.

And those of us that have been seen as Prophets in the wilderness — we’ve become mainstream all over again. Thank You Donald…

And that is why nobody takes the Dems and the Libs seriously anymore. Nobody listens to them anymore — when all they do is dress up like vaginas and they keep on talking about enforcing Political Correctness on other people. Surely the American public will listen to those Talking Vaginas…

Yet this is not theater nor is it “The vagina monologues” but it is a new version of fake news and snowflake Mass Media Networks of what “facts” should be. Imagine that: A factory of fake news = CNN. And a rabbit show of perversion = MSNBC. So it figures that Washington Post has become a trash paper and that Berkeley University has become the fascist University that shuts down Free Speech. And it follows that Microsoft the Innovation company has now become the Muslim Headquarters of Submission, uniformity and plain imitation.

But we have serious problems in tis country and we ned to solve them along with those ones that are not being addressed yet. And we have to deal with the snowflakes and the easily triggered buttercups of the Mass Media to so that. So we use subterfuge to confuse them and throw spurious spoors to drive them to follow tracks that take them over the cliff every single time.

Still some sensitive souls in the administration describe the situation thus: “Silly bastards this crew of liberal progressive mass media journalists are, but as bloodhounds with a sinus infection — they follow all the wrong smells that we send them.” So false flags, red herrings, misinformation, and the tip of the iceberg is all that these journalists can see. Nothing else. And this nothing burger called Russia’s interference has got to be the best prank since the McCarthy hearings about the Red Scare….

Give them spoors that take them to North Korea and the Kremlin and they follow that scent and get to reside there inside the Gulag for the duration…

Alexander couldn’t have been more prescient describing the ones that need to be inside the Gulag…

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 8.58.09 AM

Of course this subjugation of the Media, and the taming of the “Shrew” took some time to accomplish, but the vast corporatization of the Mass Media is now a well-done deal. And since they are operating like a herd of lemmings – they are rather easy to fool and made to jump off the cliff en masse. Indeed today’s Mass Media represent a massive regression to parochial fifth estate lack of any control towards governance. The waffling back biting pages of hysteria and shrill whinnying are proof of the grinding poverty of ideas that the left is bereft of. And this plays rather well into the hands of Master Operators like the ones now in charge, with Trump triggering all of them with each successive well timed Tweet at 3Am when they are all staying awake with Red Bull to catch such an important “red herring” that Donald throws at the mouth f the trained seals of the Media establishment.

You gotta love the guy and the way he plays them…

And rightfully President Trump will reshape the America he wants to make ‘great’ again, freely. And that finally is a great thing, because the man is a model of efficient Leadership and Management acumen. And he knows how to make deals, so it seems that his decrees always provide privileges for Americans first, as seen through a cabinet stacked with experienced and successful Business billionaires, who have no interest to “steal” from America like the Clintons in order to enrich themselves. They are already super wealthy and the rich can afford to be far more “philanthropic” that is also an American ideal, of the Conservative giving philosophy. Of course that gives greater impetus to leave things to be solved through private means rather than through the government and removes many layers of “Nanny State”.

And as difficult as it is for the left leaning Liberal Press and the Mass Media to understand, how and why so many hard working and smart thinking Americans saw a savior in a truthful cynic, a saint in a self centered individual, and a philanthropist in an unashamed and unabashed Capitalist — who is now running the United States like a strong Leader of yore.  Indeed Trump is a throwback to an earlier era when men were Men and women run scared… or something like that. But him being a leader willing to lead in an unapologetic manner, makes it necessary to acknowledge the range of talents he brings to his ways of Statesmanship. Because Statesman Trump is a very real and legitimate Statesman who has underlined and expressed the average American’s notions of disillusionment and discontent with the Establishment and their store bought politicians who did nothing good for so many years…

The forgotten American is what Donald Trump represents and this is what the official statistics rarely represent when the “fake Cognoscenti” and the privileged Gay Mafia of the Mass media and the Hollywood elites talk disparagingly about the American people. Indeed these “Marie Antoinettes” of the Mass Media and Hollywood are the highest priests and priestesses of the Spectacle Society and need to be seen as just that. They are the paper cutouts, puppets, and marionettes, all indulging themselves in shadow play-theater.

But the real American people are not playing games and the pitchforks of real anger are coming out along with massive amounts of long rifles and even field artillery all primed to blow the Plutocrats out of the water along with their establishment whores. Indeed the people’s angst cannot be represented adequately by the primary focus of these folks on getting the Banker- Wankers to run our country, nor in the fake GDP growth, as seen in the same metrics that we have inherited from the Carter administration, and intensified under Bush, Clinton, Bush II, and Obama. These folks did not serve the American working people at all.

As for the new designs of the Dems — well keep crying wolf and see what happens next…

Screen Shot 2017-03-05 at 1.30.45 PM

Strict adherence to GDP growth at any cost is painful to the people, because not only does it damage the environment, thus destroying livelihoods for many, but it also fuels inequality, and even abject poverty, by throwing many types of people off the productive classes permanently.. The wealth & poverty research conducted and published by French economist Piketty shows, that over the last 50 years, the growth in incomes of the bottom 50% of the American people, has been virtually zero, whereas the incomes of the top 1% have grown upwards of 300% over that time. Still the cost of living and goods has increased in lock step with inflation and greater corporate profit taking — over all that period of time — thus making people dramatically poorer in comparison to their parents, or themselves, of a few years earlier.

Meanwhile, good American jobs have been steadily exported to low cost and low labor destinations overseas, and to the Southern and even the Northern neighbors of the USA. And even ordinary non factory jobs have become ever more precarious and provide ever fewer rewards, for Americans, because for the low wage jobs in the country – they have to compete with the non tax paying illegals. American low skilled and day workers have to compete with the tens of millions of illegal aliens that are willing to offer themselves up for very low wages inside these United States, and therefore the native born Americans lose out on that battle too.

As always, resentment flows from injustice. And injustice is always seen and perceived through the eyes of the loser, and Americans never like to feel like losers in their own land. And that is the one lesson that the Liberal Mass media and all the Progressive politicians need to understand well.

So despite the rhetoric and the attacks on the President from the mass media, from the fake news snowflakes, and from the liberal progressive establishment elites — Donald Trump fully understands these underlying problems, and he does have a clear and undying desire as well as the ability to address them. Indeed he is the One Man that can do this, and thus he can turn all Americans into Winners again.

Prescient President Trump is working for the Common and for the largely “Forgotten American Man” woman and child — all of whom the corrupt, the crooked, the “lobster risotto” quaffing liberal Democrats, the Hillary/Sanders Socialists, are all niggardly concerned about…

Just the economic bump that President Trump has gotten started with keeping companies and jobs in America and by raising all the Equity indexes through sheer bravado, chumpah, and force of will — from the very first day the Election results were announced and well before he was inaugurated or even assumed the mantle of the White House and the Oval office.

Imagine that Power of Optimism… President Trump has brought to share with all Americans and thus raise the level of everyone’s boat… After all the incoming economic tide raises all the boats regardless of size. All of our IRAs, our retirement funds, our stock market funds, our other investments, and even the value of our homes has been steadily increasing under President Trump same as the number of jobs has been increasing steadily under his watch.

That’s the kind of President we need, and not some kind of depressed alcoholic loser as was the other option available o the menu this past election…

Think of that and you’ll understand.

Think of it and be grateful Donald Trump is our President today.

And mind the mental gap — between the optimistic reality and the naysayers who want to derail this success story of this amazing New President, Donald Trump.

Think of it and you will see all kinds of patterns that will clarify your view — no matter what your vantage point might be.

After reading this — you might understand why the enemies of President Trump are the enemies of the people.

You will face the naked truth, and understand why these self haters, are working for our enemies wanting to take away our exceptionalism and our number One spot in the world and turn us into another “has-been” defanged power. They sincerely want that because these Socialist and big government morons wish to see only negative things for America — because their own lives are in shambles. They have no God and therefore have no hope either. And indeed these hopeless and loveless individuals want to replace our communal optimism with the depressing loneliness of pessimism.

And from my perch they just want to kill our momentum in the Wall Street and seek to invite in the “bears” to throw out the “bulls” in a bid of self fulfilling prophesy that will justify their depressed and paranoid view of the world.

Sad douches of politics have no function anymore besides disrupting our Society like spoiled cry babies, snowflakes, buttercups, and worse.

Sadly they manage to stick the “strap-on” up the private parts of many misled, fragile, and vulnerable human beings that have been razed by the shattering of the fake news story the Mass Media has been telling them for a long time: “Hillary will become Madame President” regardless of her Corrupt and Crooked rigging elections and failing to even close the deal. What a Moron…

But the people feel that the Mass Media promised them something and they thought it might come to pass — and now they want to have a good Cry-pout and find ways to derail the Righteous Guy — regardless of honor and truth. As for the American way — they wanna let that be shut down. They don’t care that they are the damned ones who want to burn down the whole house because they don’t like the room their parents assigned to them… It’s all about themselves and their temper tantrum. Clearly the Lib-Dems are a bunch of cry-babies that have gone wrong on the head, because they got dropped somehow into the real world and had to face reality for a moment of two…

Maybe we should send them to live in a safe space in a quiet place like North Korea, Venezuela or Russia and China — where they can keep to themselves and medicate at will inside a gulag of their own choice, because Freedom is not becoming to them.

These morons abuse the basic freedoms that we cherish here in America by wanting to shut down Free Speech and take away our guns, as they are just getting warmed up to destroy the Constitution starting with destroying both the First and the Second Amendment.

This is what I suffered when I was attacked inside Microsoft Corporation where I was giving a speech because I had been assured that there will be Security provided by the Company and the Redmond Police department and thus I should not bring my sidearm to my Public Speech, because Microsoft Corporation does not allow personal weapons aside it’s Headquarters.

What they wanted to accomplish is to get me there unarmed and unprotected and to attack me and injure me in the head so that they can shut the strongest voice for Conservative values and principles in the Western states and especially n the great State of Washington.

These Microsoft morons acted against me like an assassination squad in the same way that Stalin sent an assassination team to kill his opponents like Trotsky and so many others who had escaped his wrath by leaving the old Soviet Union that giant gray prison that we have come to know from Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s writings about the “Gulag Archipelago” of the Siberian concentration camps for the freedom fighters and the ideological warriors of Liberty and Democracy assigned to a slow death.

These stories are not to be forgotten and where I recover after the Brain Trauma, I shall have a far more powerful voice to fight for our Liberty and for our Constitution here in America and across the World.

Make a note of it — because these Microsoft Morons who attacked me with intent to kill me and their CEO who purposefully failed to provide any security for my Speech — are all going to receive their just compensation as the American people are preparing a beautiful boycott of their stupid products.

As for the militant Ruffians of Microsoft that shattered my head, they were led by Satya Nadela, by Mike Pell, and by Todd Rawlings, who now are trying hard to cover their ass, helped by their minions, at the corrupt Police department, of the City of Redmond led by the incompetent Chief Kristi Wilson — rest assured their hour of Justice will arrive sooner rather than later. The new FBI Director will have a quiet word with them and they will scurry to their subterranean holes to slither down to their own private version of Hell.

As for the rest of the crooked Hillary supporters and their ilk, the Socialists, the militant Communists, the Islamists and the depressed Liberals who want to destroy our country from within — let’s remind them that the Barbarians still live n the Barbary coast and that is where they have got to go live if they want to feel at home.

As for the Mass Media and the Banker Wankers that want to control us, and turn us into some kind of Sharia Law slaves — they also need to be placed on notice. Mind my words: “We will destroy you before you get the chance to destroy our beautiful and God fearing country.”

Mind you, that if you want to replace our economic buoyancy with economic depression — we will bankrupt you. And if you can even imagine for one moment that we will allow you to bring your Caliphate of Hate, Victimhood, and Submission to the Western World — you’ve got another thing coming. We’ll deflate that helium ballon residing inside your empty cranial cavity, well before you could even take off…

As for those other generic Dems, the weak in the head fandoms, the gender fluid ones, the sexually confused, the hapless metrosexuals, the unable to figure out their own plumbing, and the rest of the misguided youth who want to supplant our Great American Success story with their own personal failure — let them be aware that this is not the couch of their therapist.

This is war and certain death will be their own fate, if they want to bring this barbaric islamic dystopia into our Nation. They can keep that beauty for themselves.

And lastly let’s imagine those losers who say “He is not my President” because they simply are miserable and want their misery to spread — our prayers are going out to you.

Let this be shared by everyone else too because we need to alert the Patriots that the Barbarians are already inside the gates and we need to weed them out by picking them off, one by one and sending them to a safe space in the great hereafter, of North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Siberia and beyond there everybody dresses like candidate Clinton in these smart pantsuits, we’ve all come to like so much “pet.” And I bet you can just see these unhappy Democrats and their liberal socialist friends who are all terribly depressed individuals and who can’t figure out their way to happiness outside of the prescription bottle of pills. These losers are so weak that they can’t live without their infusion of medical marijuana and without the overpriced bipolar depression pills — so if they have a real life shock they just might wake up.

Let’s provide for them, at least that… Another Shock like the Donald Trump Presidency. Ad that would be to turn the Western States into Conservative God Fearing and Republican once again… Let’s start doing this by electing yours truly Dr Churchill to the United States Senate on behalf of the State of Washington on the elections of 2018 and let’s bring Donald Trump again to the White House on the Elections of 2020 for an encore performance….

That should teach them to forget the Common man and to attack this man of the Commons.


The American people do not forget…

That’s why they voted for President Trump and came out en masse to vote.

And that is why they voted for me in the Washington States primaries too.

Because we are upright human beings and God fearing leaders — who are not afraid to put ourselves o the line for our Constitution and for our Liberty and Democracy. Freedom and Free Will are both Christian allies that no other country or religion shares to this extent — except ours.

That’s why we are an exceptional nation, and the is why God has awarded us the leadership of this World.


And that’s why America spoke loudly by calling “M.A.G.A.” for President Trump who set out to “Make America Great Again.”

Simple as that…

And that also explains the reason Trump has surrounded himself with winners, wealthy entrepreneurs, and fellow billionaires, and their ilk – because he knows that they are not going to further exacerbate the problems that their supporters voted them to solve, by dipping their fingers in the honey jar. They will never do that, because they have enough and because their appetites are fully satiated.

So maybe the Trump Presidency, will really usher the anti-establishment era, and we will all thrive in this disruptive Presidency that will regenerate America…

Methinks this is the case…

Change is coming full speed ahead.

And we like Change…

Either way we will have to experience some new things.

And even if there is a problem with President Trump — there is a silver lining.

For the left and the Democratic party, having reached political rock bottom, there is no more excuse to keep on sleeping. People are waking up all over.

New things happen all the time. Even a new party has now been born. Because when the Democratic party is dying, something else has to replace it, and much like the 1860s destruction of the Democrats, the ensuing vacuum allowed Abraham Lincoln to rise to power with a new party – so today’s New party, is the Lincoln Party and that will now rise up…

The Lincoln party is the young elephant, that aims to be the Centrist power at the table. And as we all know it is far easier to help a young elephant to stand up than trying to prop up a dying pachyderm that threatens to fall on top of you and crush you, with it’s tones and tones of old Elephant’s dying mass.

And while President Trump has barely begun swinging, he is sure to be hitting for the fences, because he has already scored a bunch of home runs without even batting yet.
To get ready to govern effectively for the next eight years, President Trump has unsettled not only the deep rooted complexes of the Federal Government by breaking down legislative gridlock, but he also has upset all the Congressional apple carts, by promoting New People in positions of power, and prepping America for term limits in all legislature, thus draining the “swamp” of the Washington DC establishment for good.

Yet President Trump does not shy away from controversy and thus he also addresses systemic problems, and has even taken on the intractable and stubbornly unsolvable and largely unlovable Israel-Palestine conflict, head on. And let’s not forget China, whom he has dismissed to the corner that she ought to stay on wearing a dunce hat, for the duration of his term. As for the freeloaders and their favorite nation Trade Deals, along with the European NATO allies that don’t pay their dues – time has come to reassess their shtick, and recognize that the freeloading party is over. They have been warned and all are now pulling up their short hairs in desperation. It will do them some good… but it’s best to start facing reality and start pulling themselves up by their bootstraps.

All that has been accomplished within President Trumps’ first few weeks in office. A hundred days that changed the mood of this world…

Still President Trump is no fool and in order to keep his Vision powerful, his powder dry, and his cabinet in good operating order, to assist him in order to be the best Statesman he can be for a New America — he knows that he will also need to address climate change. And although he will seek to do this on his own terms — he will take solutions that affect our Economy and Society in a deeper, structural way, but certainly not in the way the Leftist liberals, the Dems, and the Pseudo Progressives, would have liked him to do. So they will continue howling at the moon like lovelorn coyotes…

And that will certainly provide good soundtrack as Trump goes about revitalizing the Economy by adding tremendous value to our GDP, and deploying new climate and sustainability solutions, as he has already demonstrated. In turn that will allow all New Energy and Renewable Technologies to compete on their own merits, as well as to participate and thrive in a well lubricated Energy Market — through Capital infusions, and Innovation that will enter them into this Darwinian marketplace of the unknowable future…

As we see Trump that has already successfully revitalized our Democracy, our Politics, and our Liberty — we also see so many people believing the message of hate and division that they are out on the streets duking it out, over our basic Constitutional freedoms, and our First and Second Amendment Rights, all the while forgetting that these represent uniquely American Foundational values, and ideas that we cannot afford to lose because they constitute our deepest political ideology that makes this country great to begin with…

So all you haters out there that have been attacking me — must take a deep breath and understand that you are contributing to an unprecedented level of division and partisanship but none the less — I respect you because you are at least deepening the political involvement of an apathetic society towards some form of dialogue. And even s my head bleeds and hurts, we need to remember that we are brothers and sisters in this family of ours that we call America.

And that if we forget that basic truth that brings us together — we are liable to turn this beautiful land onto another form of a Soviet Gulag, and I am sure you won’t like that the least bit.

So be grateful for Donald Trump because he single handedly caused all Americans to rethink the relationship between Liberty, Democracy, Work, Security, and the Value of a earnest Life, lived to it’s maximum. This we all have to do, for the United States to become Great again.

Let’s help Trump because he has re-energized the national muscle of Being Proud to Be an American. And that one thing alone counts for more than anything else he has done so far.

Trump will surely get beyond our blind pursuit of GDP growth at all costs, because he wants to rebuild our infrastructure and our military and that doesn’t easily get carried over on these numbers.

President Trump will overcome the false conflicts between economic justice and identity politics, and will cut through that bullshit to the point of helping American families cope through honest jobs and the spreading of the wealth all around to the less likely of the economic pie holders.

Donald Trump will surely build an economy that provides wellbeing to all of the people, rather than to just a few, and for all kinds of weather conditions. Simple as that…

We are not talking utopia here.

We are talking cold, hard-core realism. Realism of the Trump kind. Getting the job done. That’s all we are talking about…

Because in reality, utopia is to believe that this unsustainable and inequitable approach to development can continue forever. Building a more democratic society and a sustainable economy is not fiction; it is the only available reality. As Paul Raskin said: “Business-as-usual is a utopian fantasy – forging a new social vision is a pragmatic necessity.”

Dramatic change often happens when a ‘tipping point’ is reached, when a confluence of multiple factors reaches a point of no return. Humanity is currently in a race against several tipping points. And the most important one is conflict and the evolution of war in our time.

Apparently war has become far too popular today. I say this with a degree of shame because I also enjoy the Art of the Warriors and seeking distinction in the field of honor. War is overly popular and today everybody wants it. Same as it was at the time of Queen Victoria who first uttered this observation in cynical disbelief: “War is  Of course she spoke about the Crimean war and the uselessness of that stupid conflict that we have had to relive through Russia’s annexation of that Ukrainian territory this past year…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.40.27 PM

The Crimean War was the pivotal conflict of Great Britain under Palmerston, Disraeli, and Queen Victoria who went to war against the Russian Tzars, for no other reason than simple angst, crossness, fake news, and propaganda. Much like today’s obsession with the Russians — back then we actually went to war. Indeed the Crimean campaign was the first modern mass media war and it was well broadcast through the Mass media for the first time in 1857, when Queen Victoria also instituted the Victoria Cross for bravery in battle.

In some ways the Crimean War: The war that made Britain ‘great’ because the Crimean campaign was the first modern mass media war and as such it forged many of the values that we take for granted today. the Crimean warfare has done far more than anything else to unify the British people as a nation. Indeed it is mainly because of the wars against Napoleonic France, and the two great 20th-century conflicts against Germany that Britain came together in this respect. But what about the war against Russia, the Crimean War of 1854-56, fought when the English national identity was really being fixed in the new mass media of the Victorian age?

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.08.38 PM

Today the famed “Charge of the Light Brigade” best exemplifies British courage. But we also remember the names of the other famous battles of the Crimean War. Battle spots like Alma, Sebastopol, Silistria, Constanza, Kars, Balaklava, Inkerman, Crimea, Caucasus, Galipoli, Anatolia, Izmir, Varna, Baltics, and so many other hot spots, that remind us today of spilled guts, broken bodies, cannon fodder, and blood mixed with mud in a peculiar show of Victory alternating with Defeat, and a whole lot of massively reported heroic war glory that came to define how we represent conflict thereafter. And then there were the leading actors, people like Lord Raglan, Lord Cardigan, and Viscount Palmerston who prosecuted the war as Prime Minister — all continue to inhabit our collective memory. And like the recent British Prime Minister David Cameron, we still name our daughters after Florence Nightingale, the nurse who made her name in the Crimea and became an icon of middle-class Victorian values of philanthropy, charity, and compassion.

But few of us could say what the Crimean War was all about – why it began with a religious dispute in the Holy Lands, or why France and Britain got involved in a conflict that developed in the Balkans between Turkey and Russia?

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.07.26 PM

As in our recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the reason given by the British government for its involvement in the Crimea, was the defense of Turkish sovereignty against Russian aggression. This of course was a long way from its real and deeper aims that were to reduce the power of Russia as a rival to British imperial interests in the Levant; and to secure a firmer hold on the pro-Western reformist government of the Ottoman Empire, which struggled to control the Islamic nationalisms of the Middle East.

Because of this gap there was an important role for those who fixed the public meaning of the war: journalists and pamphleteers, poets, artists and photographers, orators and priests. This was the first “modern” war in the age of mass communications – the first to be photographed, the first to use the telegraph, the first “newspaper war” – and it shaped our national consciousness.

Yet some of the most interesting aspects of the British character emerged during the Crimean War. The first was the concept of the gallant Britons standing up against the Russian Bear to defend liberty – a simple fight of “Right Against Wrong” as the magazine Punch portrayed it in an 1854 cartoon of Britannia wielding the Sword of Justice and with a lion at her side. This is how we came to see ourselves and our position in the world – as John Bull coming to the rescue of the weak against tyrants and bullies. Many of the same emotive forces were at work when Britain went to war against the Germans in defense of “little Belgium” in 1914 and Poland in 1939.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.06.58 PM

And here perhaps lie the origins of the “moral interventionism” as practiced by our own liberal governments today both in Afghanistan, as well as in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and in the Middle East.

Much of this assertiveness goes back to the foreign policy of Viscount Lord Palmerston, the main “war party” leader leading up to the Crimean War, when he took over as prime minister. More than any other politician before, Palmerston understood the need to cultivate the press and appeal in simple terms to the public. His foreign policy captured the imagination of the British as the embodiment of their national character and popular ideals: it was Protestant and freedom-loving, energetic and adventurous, proudly British and contemptuous of foreigners, particularly those of the Roman Catholic and Orthodox religion, who Palmerston associated with the worst vices and excesses of the continent. The Victorians loved his verbal commitment to liberal interventionism abroad: it reinforced their view that Britain was the greatest country in the world and that the task of government should be to export its way of life and values to those less fortunate who lived beyond its shores.


Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.06.04 PM

The idea of Britain as a Godly land of “Christian soldiers” fighting righteous wars became integral to this imperial mission. Here was the second aspect of our national consciousness that gained new force. Many of the ideas of this myth were embodied in the cult of “muscular Christianity” – a concept first expressed in Tom’s Brown’s Schooldays, written in the wake of the war, and its sequel, Tom Brown at Oxford, where sport is extolled as a builder of manly character, teamwork, chivalry and moral fortitude – qualities that made Britons good at war. The “playing fields of Eton” and all that.

In fact the public school was one of the major casualties of the Crimean War, which did more than any other event during the mid-nineteenth century to advance the middle-class ideal of meritocracy – the third element of British national identity to develop at this time. As the American writer Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote in his English Notebooks, the year of 1854 had “done the work of 50 ordinary ones” in undermining aristocracy and promoting the professional ideal.

It was not just the military blunders by the army’s aristocratic leadership – most famously the Charge of the Light Brigade – but of the almost criminal negligence in failing to provide for the troops. Without sufficient food, warm clothes or shelter to survive the freezing winter, thousands perished from cold, exhaustion and disease.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.05.38 PM

The mismanagement triggered a new assertiveness in the middle classes, which rallied round the principles of professional competence, industry, meritocracy and self-reliance in opposition to the privilege of birth. It was a sign of their triumph that in the decades afterwards, Conservative and Liberal governments alike introduced reforms promoting these ideals, such as the extension of public schooling, opening of the Civil Service, a new system of merit-based promotion in the armed services, etc. And indeed the political scramble for Middle England had begun.

Florence Nightingale symbolised the new confidence of the professional classes. The legend of the “Lady with the Lamp” was retold in schoolbooks, histories and biographies. It contained the basic elements of the middle-class Victorian ideal: a Christian narrative about maternal care, good works and self-sacrifice; a moral one of self-improvement and the salvation of the deserving poor; a domestic tale of cleanliness, healthcare, and good housekeeping; a story about individual determination; and a public narrative of sanitary and hospital reform that would influence the foundation of the NHS.

What Florence Nightingale embodied above all was a nationwide concern for the vast suffering of the ordinary troops, who had sacrificed so much for their country. Here was another aspect of national British unification.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.03.43 PM

The Crimean War brought about a sea change in Britain’s attitudes towards its fighting men. Previously the military hero was a gentleman, like the Duke of York, the son of George III and commander of his forces against Napoleon, whose column was erected in Waterloo Place in London five years after the duke’s death in 1833. It was paid for by deducting one day’s pay from every soldier in the army.

But the heroes who returned from Crimea were the common troops. Their deeds were recognised for the first time in 1857, when Queen Victoria instituted the Victoria Cross, awarded to gallant servicemen regardless of class or rank. Among the first recipients of Britain’s highest military honour were 16 privates from the army, five gunners, two seamen and three boatswains.

In 1861 the collective sacrifice was commemorated with the unveiling of the “Guards” Memorial. Standing opposite the Duke of York’s column, the three bronze guardsmen cast from Russian cannon captured at Sebastopol, symbolised a fundamental shift in values. Our military heroes were no longer dukes, but the “Private Smiths” or “Tommies” of folklore, who fought courageously and won all Britain’s wars in spite of the blunders of his generals. Here was the basis of our national story from the Crimea to the two world wars, and the more recent sacrifices which we honour once a year when we stand in silence in front of the Cenotaph, and we deposit wreaths of poppies or wear one red poppy on our lapels…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.04.49 PM

So today again the very first issue is the popularity of war and the eagerness of the American Public and their leading liberal Politicians to use war as a means of distraction and subterfuge for anything that pops up in their threat radar.

Yet they never think of war as a solution for other things like climate change. Yet this is how we should be thinking. Let’s put our efforts towards solving Climate Change on a war footing and then we can don our spoors and increase the scientific advances against catastrophic climate change and maybe stop a fast warming planet form overheating.

And I am saying this because all available evidence suggests that our ecosystems are being disrupted at a rate much faster than foreseen, or that can be remediated. We are losing topsoil, arable land, underground mineral water, exposed fresh water, original forests, agricultural belts, equatorial zones being dessertified, coral reefs dying, and species going extinct — all these happenning at vastly accelerated rates.

The world is overpopulated, over fertilised, overheated, and over polluted. Biodiversity is in freefall. And yet all we can think is how about going to war against each other… Daft eh? Or are we super stupid in a really Darwinian way?

Seems like this is a fancy dress ball for the end of the Titanic. Yet these are all factors that are contributing mightily to a biophysical tipping point that is steaming ahead and quite simply — poses an existential risk to humanity.

Needs to be addressed pronto.


More on this later but for now let’s talk some more War… and the glorification of battle engagement and war glory.

It all starts with Leadership and Statesmanship like back in the days of the Crimean War that we are bound to repeat it once again with all this talk about Russian involvement in America’s elections and interference in America’s affairs and the particular witch hunt that has been unleashed and is reminiscent of the Red Scare of the Cold War McCarthy era in the 1950’s.

Back in the days of the Crimean War — a war that could have been totally avoided but we plunged headlong into it like the hopeless “Charge of the Light Brigade” because we saw how Mass Media manipulated this conflict and drove us headlong into full scale War. Indeed they made the war so popular that even the Queen and Empress Victoria scoffed at this mass delusion, and took a “swipe” at the war mongers, by humorously describing the Crimean War, as the “Most Popular War Ever” in her own historical time of … forever.

Read this and please tell me if it reminds you of anything taking place today…

Empress Victoria’s own PM was Viscount Palmerston who was over 70 years of age when he finally became Prime Minister, at the most advanced age at which anyone has ever become Prime Minister for the first time… older even than Winston Churchill’s premiership.

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 7.50.31 AM

Palmerston had been holding a large number of offices during the course of his career, while he served the people and the Crown in government for a total of 46 years. Indeed a record in the historical period for the servants of the people. And obviously as this unique record suggests, the Viscount loved the power of office. Arguably, he was really good at it, and also he was not particularly choosy about his colleagues, or their principles — so he acted like a weathervane, tilting this way and that way and always changing his mind based on the company he kept or what the people and the cabinet advised him. Maybe he was a bit driven by the newspapers and by the polls of the day but above all else he followed whatever the last person he spoke to had suggested. Because of that talent of being malleable, he was also a rather popular guy who did develop the popularity that secured his premiership.

Lord Palmerston’s Temple family were Anglo-Irish landlords with no long tradition of political eminence, but Palmerston, who inherited the title at the age of 17, wanted to change that, because he had a rather liberal mindset and wanted to serve and involve himself in “Matters that Mattered” and as any good liberal he “bought” his first “elected” position. His was an Irish peerage, allowing him to serve as an MP, which he did almost continuously from 1807, aged 22, until his death. He took junior office straight away, holding onto it through Lord Liverpool’s premiership, but did not reach the cabinet until 1827. With like-minded ‘liberal Tory’ colleagues, he resigned the following year from Wellington’s new government, criticising him for his illiberal foreign and Irish policy. When Wellington opposed parliamentary reform and his government fell in 1830, Palmerston looked like a liberal centrist figure who would strengthen and moderate Earl Grey’s new pro-reform government.

Palmerston was a staunch liberal who became Foreign Secretary, a post he held for 15 of the next 21 years. He loved wielding power through blunt, imperious despatches, written at high-speed and full of bold instructions to British diplomats all round the world. He did not mind offending other countries, or even Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, who had different ideas about Europe. In the 1830s he stood up to France in the Eastern Mediterranean, while he pursued a strong but controversial anti-Russian policy on the Indian frontier. Later, he sympathised with some aims of the 1848 revolutionaries in Europe, pleasing many radicals at home. He argued for a firm line against both French and Russian ambitions in the Ottoman Empire in the early 1850s, but his influence over policy in the lead-up to the Crimean War was limited, since he was distrusted by the Prime Minister Lord Aberdeen, who made him Home Secretary instead (1852-5). Yet he was always seen as the safest pair of hands and clearly Palmerston was always the darling of the Mass Media and always described as the best man for the job because he always obliged the powerful aristocracy of the Media and the Armaments manufacturers and the generalized Military Industrial Complex, with low-bending to their wishes. So he listened, he agreed and he complied and thus he became the Prime Minister and form then on, fulfilled his promises to his powerful friends, by taking the nation to an interminable war. The Crimean War is what Lord Palmerston brought upon his country and foisted upon the whole World, because in many ways this was the very First World War.

Palmerston did this only because that is what his “special Friends” wanted. And they wanted War because it was the best way to keep factories churning out supplies and also because it was a great way to fill their order books by selling arms, medical supplies, cannons, cannon fodder, materiel, and everything else to the War Office. Palmerston’s special industrious friends also wanted to have glorification of war in order to make this habit the new normal and that is why they wanted to memorialize the Crimean conflict through paintings, vivid photographs, and heroic stories, all written and composed as the newspaper appetite for fresh publishing material grew exponentially. The Press barons whipped up a frenzy of popular sentiment for the want of war — if not the need for it. And they succeeded in this so that people demanded war and nest thing you know they are falling dead in droves, in foreign cold and inhospitable locales, with strange Russian unpronounceable names — not knowing that the real reason for the war was to sell bullets, bayonets, materiel, cannonballs, arms and armaments, along with common goods and supplies, and also in order to sell their stories in the various newspapers, magazines, and books that the public snapped up like mad….

Indeed this war was mad. Yet this general madness had fallen upon the people at the time — somewhat similar to the madness that has befallen people today and that might end us inexorably to another war we don’t need — just so the President gets out of this witch hunt and regains his own personal peace of mind while the country gets plunged in a nuclear carnage….

How’s that for stupidity that you bring upon yourselves snowflakes?

And you there will be no safe space from radiation anywhere on this Good God’s Earth after a nuclear exchange. Then come back and tell me he is not your President… you dummies.

This amazing market opportunity, Viscount Palmerston happily provided. Indeed he gave them war aplenty. And he popularized and glorified War as the highest honorable game left to men… and now to women also as Florence Nightingale proved useful in helping the injured the infirm and the invalids after the carnage left the field of honor.

The first year of the Crimean war went badly, with many criticisms of his poor cabinet and of his administration. For different reasons, the established political leaders – Lord Aberdeen, Lord John Russell and Lord Derby – were widely disliked. When Aberdeen’s government fell in early 1855, Palmerston was generally seen as the best man for the job, because of his no-nonsense, administrative vigour, his lack of narrow partisanship on domestic issues, and the newspapers’ support of his ‘manly’ yet liberal approach to foreign policy. He had increasingly cultivated the burgeoning British press, unlike most of his rivals.

Palmerston was Prime Minister for most of the last ten years of his life. He brought the Crimean War to a generally successful conclusion and survived the embarrassment of the Indian Mutiny in 1857. He improved his popular appeal through high-handed behaviour towards China and by presenting Italian unification (1859-60) as a victory for Britain over France, Austria, Russia and the Pope. His strong defence policy was widely approved. In the 1860s there was less scope for a vigorous stance abroad, but the economy was in a very healthy state and his government made large cuts to income taxes and food duties, adding to his reputation, and especially that of his Chancellor, William Gladstone.

Lord Palmerston continued to avoid controversial domestic reforms, which would have weakened his image as a centrist politician. When he died in 1865, aged 80 and still in office, many people thought that an era had definitely ended, and that parliamentary and Irish reform, and a more vigorous party politics, were now urgently needed.

As for those who fought and died, so they didn’t get a Crimean war medal, or a Victoria’s cross for valor in battle, or even a body to bury in the parish yard — it seems that the shine of the war was a bit lost on them. As it was lost on their forlorn wives, on their stricken Mothers, on their saddened Fathers, and on their orphaned children. So many children were orphaned from the Crimean war that society had to set up the widows and orphans pauper homes and societies to look after them. That’s where the Victorian and Dickensian orphanages came into their own and that is where both boys and girls, grew up as brothers and sisters who hated war that had robbed them of their father and family and assigned them to the status of a lost waif.

For all of them as it is for anyone who knows the carnage of war intimately — the colors of the heroic canvas have worn off…. long ago much like the paintings we see, after long exposure to the light of truth and to the sun of unfettered revelation of war’s realities…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 10.05.13 PM

Yet today the glossy patina of war has been erased. War is not so popular anymore… And it certainly is not as needed anymore. As for Russia — we’ve been enemies for far too long and maybe we should bury that hatchet ceremoniously and make friends again.

And that makes complete sense when we recognize that today our wars have become so catastrophic, and our weapons have become so powerful, that perhaps we should retain the vainglorious aspect of it, and the pursuit of distinction and honor — and yet lose it’s killing essence.

And that we can do easily today…

Indeed we can accomplish this in a smart way.

We can start by making peace with Russia, and redirecting the voices calling for war and the militating energies that are driving us towards war — to other less conflictual, non confrontational, and certainly loftier achievements. We can set other types of “high peaks” to conquer, and seek new glories to attain. Why not see new glories, like conquering Climate Change, and solving the issue of a warming planet that is rapidly running out of resources…

Methinks that we best do this now…

We best engage in these pursuits now, because we have to avoid Thermo-Nuclear war at any cost. And that is simple Physics because there are going to be hardly any survivors left after a Nuclear exchange… to even allow a new Florence Nightingale to emerge and help the terribly wounded and maligned survivors.

Not because we don’t have good souls like Florence Nightingale today — but because there will be no survivors to tend to… and therefore no Florence to show up.

And because the Trump Presidency is at a fork on the road for addressing war — we need to encourage them towards peace and towards investing their energies in a war of a different kind. How about waging war against climate change and using our strong energetic actions in a major way to solve that big problem.

But, war on Climate Change is by no means the whole story. We need fresh innovation, science, and solutions that can reverse the destruction of the ecosystems and the decline of our Earth’s capacity to regenerate and cover the resources we consume each and every year.

We have solutions to conserve and to reuse resources so that we do not exhaust the carrying capacity of this earth. But what is missing, above all, is the political will to apply them at some form of adequately impactful scale. Thus, President Donald Trump may be a blessing in disguise, because he can help us glorify the battle against catastrophic Climate Change and become our Earth Leader and benevolent Climate warrior along the way…

methinks he will be able to pull this of rather well because as the escalating climate crisis becomes clear and stark — he may raise to a new level the already existing good works of millions of people all across the world. And he understands business and he can’t fail to see that it is an opportunity — perhaps the best yet — to bring people together and collectively push for a shift toward a future that is economically full of jobs, sustainable, prosperous, and quite equitable too.

He is a risk taker and can handle this shift because for far too many years our leaders have simply shrugged and continued to sleep walk towards war and disaster. Yet it is proven through history that only when leadership at the top fails us, we do the right thing, because we have no other option, than to become leaders ourselves.

And these are the signs of possibility and hope in this otherwise dismal cloud. The silver threads are all around us, but by no means they comprise a silver lining. And in no particular order, here below are some of the developments that can expand to the tipping point to an economy that promotes wellbeing for all, rather than only riches for a few, and chocking death for the many as in London’s Victorian era when Winston Churchill first came to address his own environmental consciousness with his passionate defense of Clean Air, thus ushering in the first instance in the world of Climate Change regulation. Year later after the war when Winston was Prime Minister for a second time — he again had to deal with the persistent chemical fog in London that gave rise to the first regulations preventing the burning of coal in the hearths of the homes of the citizenry. Indeed this first environmental regulation globally was enacted during his second government cabinet Administration.

From that crisis of Winston Churchill’s climate issue, we have a few key take-away points. The first of which is communication, and information sharing with the people and he taught us that bit of truth when he summoned the Press in the Hospital where he went to visit the victims of respiratory ailments during the height of this dastardly fog that had fallen upon the city of London. Winston solved London fog, or at least that virulent chemical type of thick breath taking fog, and we can learn form his example. So today we can make ourselves useful to that extent because now we can communicate in real time with essentially everyone in the world, and we ought to do so and talk about the issues that matter — and not about whatever we had for breakfast lunch or dinner…

Let us use our amazingly tactile communications infrastructure wisely, and for our benefit, because this usage empowers millions of people at virtually no cost to make social organizing easier than ever before — in order to bring people together to sort out the big problems and address the serious issues. We can do this again through science based solutions that are sorely needed to be addressed if we are to solve this all too human problem. Peer-to-peer climate change actions and renewable energy solutions could now become reality, whether in sharing systems integration, financial resources, or climate information, data gathering, open source software development, shared economy, and shared goods, on demand services, less car ownership, shared rides, shared accommodation, or even shared and all too human scale political strategies.

Second goal is to increase the deployment of renewable energy. Solar, wind and other clean resources allow for a decentralised system of production and consumption, which promises to turn households into ‘energy independent’ nodes of a global network. Costs per kilowatt-hour are now below fossil fuel cost levels, despite the $10 million a minute in subsidies that fossil energy still enjoys. Studies reveal that advanced economies could transition to 100 per cent renewable energy in as little as 20 years while helping poorer countries to avoid the toxic addiction to fossil fuels in their development trajectories. While jobs are being lost in the fossil fuel industry, they are on the rise in renewable energies: the US solar sector employs 77% more people than coal mining, creating employment opportunities 12 times as fast as the job creation of the economy as a whole. By 2016, China, alone, had created 3.5 million renewable energy jobs. In 2017, renewable energy employment is growing at 5% a year globally.

All of this is positive but how do we countenance the forces that lead to climate change?  Or how do we address the skeptics, the deniers, and all those adherents to Victorian era climate science, that obfuscates the facts and thus justifies inaction in the face of rapid and unstoppable anthropogenic Climate Change?

That is the big question. It is the biggest question indeed, because despite robust science and it’s attempts to elucidate the issues — we have been subject to a sleigh of hands and some magic tricks that obscure the facts. All these “theatrics” have been deployed by climate change deniers, consistently for the last 50 years since Winston’s death, and only now have started coming undone. The Climate deniers have finally come unglued and thus now we have reached a level of scientific consensus on the man-made alteration of global temperatures. An accomplishment that is informing not only global debate, for example, by introducing terms such as the “Anthropocene Era” and by adopting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, but also in informing the behaviour of a number of XL businesses all around the world, which are now starting to focus on protecting natural capital, natural resources, and ecosystems. Finance firms have gotten back int the Climate Change game too with sustainable Finance being a Multi-Trillion industry now, and with Reinsurance companies choosing the Insurance firms’ exposure to Climate Change and charging their downhill business partners accordingly higher premiums based on the exposure to the Climate Change damaging factors, and in some cases even going as far, as denying insurance to companies that are not ecologically minded…

Imagine that. Just imagine… And evened movements are being created everyday that are pushing companies and organizations to divest from fossil fuel investments into dirty and polluting fuel companies, and thus “reclaim the sky, the land, and the waters.” These youth movements are growing rapidly and even becoming a strong social force.

Sharing the benefits of the sharing economy is a must for the Trump Presidency, because that is Business Innovation at it’s best and it represents the low hanging fruit out there…
At the same time, we are witnessing the rise of local government that attempts to be responsible and responsive for all things. It s a natural reaction because as central authorities and central governments keep getting bigger and more unwieldy — they also keep failing us their citizens, more states, regions and cities are taking the lead in carve their own path to the future. In the US, states and localities from New England to California and Texas, have defied Washington by adopting ambitious plans for sustainability. Smart villages adopting new technologies and off-the-grid solutions are mushrooming in Latin America, SE Asia, and even Africa. Soon to come in America too — when the local regulators stop treating people like an extension of their local authority and wanting them tethered to their inefficient grids.

Yet the real innovation takes place in America as we see by this chart: Back in October of 2016, along with the elections, California committed to double the rate of energy efficiency and to generating half of the state’s electricity from renewable resources by 2030. This came to be the major part of its pledge to cut carbon pollution by 40% below 1990 levels. Nine New England states have joined California in requiring carmakers to shift to zero-emission vehicles. New York has launched an energy plan that allows residents to produce and share their own energy through peer-to-peer mechanisms such as the ‘blockchain’.

Economic and social innovations are also increasing exponentially. Hundreds of thousands of people around the world are rethinking the economy by introducing alternative currencies, most of them in digital format, following the explosion of the blockchain process, on which it is based. In Europe, the network Regiogeld (regional money) unites a number of towns and states in the world’s largest network of community currencies. The idea of a basic income for all, which seemed impossible just a couple of years ago, is now being experimented with from Finland to Mongolia, and from India to South Africa – while many others, like Italy, and Germany want to follow soonest.

Regenerative agriculture, pioneered in Africa, South America, and South Asia, has seen new organic approaches to farming hold the promise of producing sufficient food for all, while using methods that restore ecosystems and capture carbon.

But all of that amounts to a drop of water trying to put out a fire of fanaticism, barbarism, and hate that has now infected all of our Societies.

Because now the world finds itself again in a tug of war, trying to choose which fork of the road we will take. We are fighting the daft ideological enemy of Muslim religion, that wants to pull us in the direction of Mecca where silly people pray to a small chunk of a meteorite, or towards the world of enlightenment and progress where we will be able to travel to the meteorites ourselves. And once there we will mine these meteorites for ore, for business, and pleasure — but surely not for religious purposes.

And here is where comes the rub…

Screen Shot 2017-05-20 at 7.02.10 AM

Yes, we know that we have many forces pulling us towards this particularly silly form of Asiatic darkness, and they want to usher in the Muslim dark ages all over again — with Sharia law enhanced terror.

But we are not entirely defenseless against submission to illiterate Imams, and we are not going to stop defending our civilization against that “Jihad” of crazed Muslim “Gazis” unleashing terror upon us, because we have this amazing thing called FREE WILL. And it is Free Will that will allow us to keep standing tall against those who want to usher-in an era of dire poverty, famine, and a dystopia full of constant and continued conflict, that will lead to inevitable resource depletion, and all the remaining survivors living inside a gulag of decapitations, in a vastness of inequality, and ultimately guaranteeing for us a most assured nuclear destruction — that might serve as the “coup de grace” to our Western Civilization.

This is the fortune hidden on the one hand.

And yet on the other hand we hold the promise of a mature and powerful movement of intelligent people in the direction of Free Will, Science, Economic Growth, Shared Prosperity, sustainability, and unprecedented opportunity. And with President Trump, the Western Civilization team has just received a major jolt of energy, while our members are steadily growing, learning from previous mistake,s and building on growing successes.

Still we are a long way from winning…

In a very real sense, we are still addicted to the globalist mantra of growth at all costs, and an inequitable economic model of Carbon based economies that are only serving the energy purveyors of Muslim origin. Yet the President Trump seeks energy independence from the Arabs and their oil-wells, and that represents the eventual long term benefits of the Trump Presidency that may just be the use of all new and fully American Energy resources, and the technological innovation and solutions to all of these crises and potential tipping points that have brought us here now. And we recall that in order to be able and willing to open the door for the Changes required towards a transition to the sustainable, equitable, and prosperous world that the vast majority of humanity wants — we ought to accept that CHANGE is GOOD.

But the change that we want — is not gonna be coming from the mouth of the imam, or from the throat of the muezzin screaming from up high on the minaret’s parapet… The Change we want will come from the laboratory and from the R&D department of smart Startup companies that innovate for the common good.

The change we want can only come from the Political Philosophy of Conserving our Western Civilization and our Constitution from the illiterate hordes of barbarians.

And lastly the CHANGE WE WANT comes form a smart robust leader like Donald Trump who wants to bring forth the Christian ideals of a FREE WORLD safe from the scourge of the middle ages that some of our uneducated muslim friends want to =bring back up in the form of a stupid Caliphate.

And if I can help it, this will be a Free World and not some kind of Soviet Gulag under Sharia Law that the good wishes of the Big government Lib-Dems and their well meaning Socialist Islamist friends want to usher in for all of us.

I would hate to have to live and die off inside one of those Soviet gulags that Alexander Solzhenitsyn memorialized in his graphic descriptions of the terrors of the totalitarian regime that turned a whole society onto a gray odorless, colorless, and killing field of a giant Gulag.

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 8.58.32 AM

At least we both know what Alexander Solzhenitsyn suffered and we don’t want that for ourselves.

And we also know that You and I are both ready to fight against that hateful Gulag from ever taking root in our country.

Alexander warned us — are we listening?

Screen Shot 2017-05-19 at 8.58.57 AM

Lets’ read again Solzhenitsyn’s Archipelago Gulag to refresh our memories of where we stand and how grateful we ought to be about that…

But we also have to be reminded to fight along with the rest of the Free World who is ready to fight against that dystopian and autocratic totalitarianism, and Donald Trump just might be the man to lead us and help us escape that dismal future…

May God deliver us from Evil.

And may we find our path and may by the Grace of God — we manage to find the strength in our limbs, and raise the courage necessary to walk ourselves out — out of this mental Gulag that our oppressors of the Plantation Politics leadership of the Lib-Dems, have assigned us to live and die into — like so many slaves and savages…

As for the violence that they visited upon me — make no mistake karma is a bitch and multitudes of it will fall upon them and upon the heads of their children. The blood of the innocent is upon their heads…

So let’s gather our wits and walk out now, and let’s go ahead to resurrect our Republic of Freedom and Democracy.

Let’s do this not for ourselves bit let’s do it for our Children…


Dr Churchill

Winston Churchill approves.

To be continued…

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 18, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 12)

Most pundits and analysts would agree that Great Britain today is a bit down on the heels. And maybe she is just regaining her Independence from the Evil German project the European Union has descended into, so she is feeling a little more confident again. But her claims to greatness are either past or premature gloating. Because today’s Great Britain is certainly not a major World Leading military power, any longer – so that title has to be discarded deep inside History’s round file.

Unless we do something drastic about it…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 8.48.11 AM

And yet there is a constant refrain from British political leaders of how Britain is still a major military force to be reckoned with in the world and this allows the country to punch above its middle ranking economic and political power status.

The Prime Minister Theresa May has constantly stressed how Britain is a leading member of NATO and spends 2% of UK GDP on defense. Indeed, in her new role as President Trump’s cheerleader in-chief she has taken it upon herself to start lecturing other European members of NATO about their military capabilities. British Defence Secretaries over the decades have boasted that Britain has global military power projection capabilities, while other commentators talk of Britain’s military as “the guardian of the Gulf” or a reliable and steadfast military partner of the United States or upholding the rule of law abroad, the scourge of dictators like Saddam Hussein and terrorist groups like al Qaeda and the Taliban. In reality, is Britain in any position to lecture other European countries on their militaries? Is this just more delusional rhetoric from the British State which is quick to lecture others without ensuring its own house is in order, or there is truth in this heady & aspirational thinking?

In reality is Britain still a major military power?

We ask this question because, when the broad sweep of 20th century military history is taken into account, the British military has never really been an effective fighting force, according to some… But then there are defeatists everywhere.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.51.04 AM

And such are the views of General Sir Richard Barrons, one of the former chiefs of the four services, should give everyone who promotes the idea of Britain as an effective, major military power, pause for thought. Back in September 2016 General Barrons stated that due to nearly a few decades worth of stringent cuts to the UK defence budget Britain’s military had “withered” and would not even be capable of defending the UK against a serious military attack, let alone fight in conventional wars. In a forthright and refreshingly honest ten page memo to the Tory British Defence Secretary Michael Fallon, the General made clear that: “Neither the UK homeland nor a deployed force — let alone both concurrently — could be protected from a concerted Russian air effort.” So, in the expert opinion of the former head of the UK’s Joint Forces Command the British military would be wholly inadequate in protecting the UK against an external military force acting with hostile intent. The first duty of any military is to be able to secure and defend the homeland of its country. If the UK military are not even up to this task, how can they be called a major military power and how can Theresa May with any credibility lecture other countries about their defense preparations when the UK military could not even defend the UK in the event of a major military attack?

Looking over recent conflicts of the early 21st century that the British military have been involved in does not inspire much confidence in the operational performance of and strategic leadership of the UK military.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 12.42.35 AM

Iraq is an absolute disaster and has become a fertile breeding ground for radical Islamist extremist terrorist groups, and even for a world spreading cancer of ISIS, the Islamic State or the Caliphate that is now in 39 countries already because of our lack of response, and continuous retrenchment. The Caliphate is exploiting the vacuum left behind our anemic foreign policy and that of our weakened American Cousins that since the Clinton days of the State Department were mostly worried about enriching themselves than helping the stability and security of the World. The fish stinks from the top and as Hillary Clinton the Secretary of State, gave the clue of using her US government position for personal gain & private enrichment – everybody else felt that it was a free for all, and every man and woman for himself and herself – and that was the end of any semblance of order, with billions if not Trillions going unaccountable and lost from the Federal government.

And inside Iraq today the situation presents a far bigger security headache than what it was prior to the UK-US invasion of 2003, that was ostensibly geared to find Weapons of Mass Destruction and to topple the dictator Saddam Hussein. Now many prognosticators and far too many old Middle Eastern hands, from the security agencies, are pining for those quiet good old days of So-damn Saddam.

Meanwhile Afghanistan is not much better, at all.

Screen Shot 2017-04-28 at 1.42.23 PM

It was truly shocking, disappointing and deeply upsetting that after all the time, money, lives and resources expended by the British military in securing Helmand province that once the British army largely withdrew the province was once again overrun by Taliban forces.

As Major Richard Streatfeild, who spent seven months in Sangin in 2009 and 2010 with the Rifles, said it was “hugely disappointing” to see Sangin under threat again.

“I won’t deny, on a personal level, it does make you wonder – was it worth it?” he said. “Because if the people we were trying to free Afghanistan from, are now able to just take it back within two years — that shows that something went badly wrong at the operational and strategic level.”


Perhaps from a cold headed analysis of the performance of the British military in various theatres of war throughout the 20th century and most certainly early 21st century it would reveal that on an operational and strategic level the British military is not a major global military force as the British Government would have their public believe.

Yet as Mrs Thatcher said of spin:

“Such is presentation” — “How different from reality.”

But the situation with the depleted American Military is just the same.., and that is why the revisionist powers are now making land grabs and territorial gains unopposed everywhere they can throw a compass at…

And because average Americans also tend to take their being the Major Military Power of the world, and the fundamental stability of the international system and it’s seeming placid order — for granted — they might suffer the same delusional logic that the British Forces suffer today.

A far greater flash & bang, than actual results on the ground, from the use of force, and a weakening of all the Armed Services has resulted. And the World Order is falling – and all that while still complaining about the burden the United States carries in preserving that elusive and unstable stability.

Screen Shot 2017-03-23 at 11.37.04 AM

Of course some Americans Patriots already know that History shows that world orders do collapse in unexpected, rapid, and violent ways, but average people just don’t think that much, when they watch the latest never ending game on TV. They are simply occupied with the football scores, or the hockey pucks getting in the net between the legs of the goalie or the endless reality shows and entertaining TV plots of the hard working clueless, boobsy, and gender fluid Kardashian family.

Indeed some people say today that long term survival of this Civilization is beyond their comprehension or their intellectual grasp, nor do they care much about it — because they have plenty of bread & circuses to keep them riveted to the stupid box TV broadcasting 24.’7 all manners of garbage and mind rot into their homes and offices. And of course on top of that they have video and computer games and the all knowable, infinite gambling, and titillating porn infused, Internet, to stimulate their senses, ad infinitum…

But I don’t believe that.

The American Public is erudite and knowing to the point of being able to discern the Good from the Bad amongst those wishing to become their Leaders, even going as far as to devalue the opinion of the paid Media and the professional Pundits. The Americans don’t buy the Propaganda that has seen many nations destroyed from within, because they are taught from very early on, a tremendous distrust of the Experts and the Government, and are therefore natural Guardians of Liberty and Freedom. And as befitting a revolutionary populace – they are armed to boot.

So, although it is easy to say that they do not have much History – they have a strong sense of reality in that they understand Living History and they know their place in it far better than most other nations on this earth.

And maybe they do not care to recall that as the late 18th century, Artful Peace and Prosperity, were the high point of the Enlightenment in Europe, before the continent fell suddenly into the abyss of the Napoleonic Wars, but we shouldn’t care too much about it either…

Because back then it was pomp & circumstance without substance. Society revolved around a tremendous inequality and all the leaders were involved in society balls and chamber music, that were all the rage, so everybody was surprised when all hell broke loose and they all had to run and hide hopelessly in their basements along with their valued harpsichords, and their mistresses, hoping to save their musical merriment and their peccadillos, if not their lives.


Similarly, in the first decade of the 20th century, the world’s smartest minds and all the experts – politicians and statesmen alike – had predicted an end to war and to the great-power conflicts, as revolutions in communications, transportations, and trade, knit the competing economies and their Peoples closer and closer together, in common peace, and interdependence.

Yet the most devastating war in history came a short four years later. And it was started between the two nations that had the strongest economic and commercial ties to each other nonetheless.

Follow this up with the jazzy and roaring 20’s. The era of unparalleled wealth creation, art, and civilization, mixed up with a dab of debauchery and Great Gatsby cynicism, spread amongst lazy people basking in the apparent calm of the postwar 1920s, that soon became the crisis-ridden 1930s, and then it led straight into another world war, whose ferocity, destructiveness, and inhumanity, had never been seen before.

Seems that with each successive World Conflict we seem to excel in the imaginative uses of death & destruction, and we surpass ourselves in whatever Evil we had managed to experience in the earlier wars…

And today with far more devastating weapons we are sure to top that world war two evil doing — soonest.

So pray tell, where exactly do You think that we are in this classic scenario today?

And how close to the war we are at this intersectional point in history?

Do you know?

Do you even care to venture a guess?

Tell me if you know.

Tell me, because, as always, our Leaders, claim that it is impossible to know.

I know…

But am not telling, because it makes a huge difference, if we are a fortnight, or a year or three, away from a global crisis, and war. And we don’t want to create a self fulfilling prophesy either. Nor do we want to hasten the inevitable preparations for it… and it’s ushering in an era of sad behaviors and mayhem.

Yet one thing I can say is that we are much closer than further from that moment – so let’s be alarmed now, in order to wake-up, prepare, and fight, so as not to get caught with our pants down.

Screen Shot 2016-08-09 at 2.05.04 PM

Tell me because that knowledge is gold and diamonds and rainbows and black storm clouds, and a field of slain unicorns and a bloody heap of newborn babies, all rolled into one.

Tell me because we are somewhere on that path, and that is unmistakable.

And while it is too soon to know what effect anyone’s presidency will have on these trends, early signs suggest that the new administration is more likely to hasten us toward crisis than slow or reverse these trends. The further accommodation of Russia can only embolden Vladimir Putin, and the tough talk with China will likely lead Beijing to test the new administration’s resolve militarily. Whether the President is ready for such a confrontation is entirely unclear. For the moment, he seems not to have thought much about the future ramifications of his rhetoric and his actions, but I do believe that He is strategic in his thinking.

Only, perhaps not strategic enough, in the classical Geopolitical sense of the graduates of the War College or West Point. But his business acumen is brilliant and sometimes that can be enough. Couple that, with proper Strategic advise of the Churchillian kind, that will allow for filling in the gaps of his knowledge of the Grand Game, so that he can play like a Master.

Surely Trump knows that China and Russia are classic revisionist powers, and fierce antagonists, hating each other far more than hating anyone else. And although both enmity powers have never enjoyed greater security from external and internal threats emanating from foreign powers, than they do today — Russia from its traditional enemies to the west, and China from its traditional enemy in the east, they are both keenly dissatisfied with the current global configuration of power.

Go Figure…

Today they both seek to restore the hegemonic dominance they once enjoyed in their respective regions, but are also advancing global agendas for their geopolitical supremacy.


Nobody knows besides the fact that nature abhors a vacuum and they sense one developing through the withdrawal and retrenchment of the United States from our Strategic spheres of Influence.

For China, that means dominance of East and SouthEast Asia, with countries like Japan, South Korea, and the nations of Southeast Asia both acquiescing to Beijing’s will, and acting in conformity with China’s strategic, economic, and political preferences. That includes American influence withdrawn to the eastern Pacific, behind the Hawaiian Islands. For Russia, it means hegemonic influence in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia, which Moscow has traditionally regarded as either part of its empire or part of its sphere of influence. Both Beijing and Moscow seek to redress what they regard as an unfair distribution of power, influence, and honor, in the U.S.-led postwar global order.

And as centralized autocracies, both feel threatened by the dominant democratic powers in the international system, and by the growing democracies near their borders.

And as it turns out, both of these revisionist powers regard the United States as the principal obstacle to their ambitions, and therefore both seek to weaken the American-led international security order, that stands in the way of their achieving what they regard as their rightful destinies.

And until fairly recently, Russia and China have faced considerable, almost insuperable, obstacles in achieving their objectives. The chief obstacle had been the power and coherence of the international order itself and its principal promoter and defender. The American-led system of political and military alliances, especially in the two critical regions of Europe and East Asia, has presented China and Russia with what Dean Acheson once referred to as “situations of strength” that have required them to pursue their ambitions cautiously and, since the end of the Cold War, to deter serious efforts to disrupt the international system. The system has checked their ambitions in both positive and negative ways. During the era of American primacy, China and Russia have participated in and for the most part been beneficiaries of the open international economic system the United States created and helps sustain; so long as that system functions, they have had more to gain by playing in it than by challenging and overturning it.

The political and strategic aspects of the order, however, have worked to their detriment. The growth and vibrancy of democratic government in the two decades following the collapse of Soviet communism posed a continual threat to the ability of rulers in Beijing and Moscow to maintain control, and since the end of the Cold War they have regarded every advance of democratic institutions—especially the geographical advance of liberal democracies close to their borders—as an existential threat. That’s for good reason: Autocratic powers since the days of Klemens von Metternich have always feared the contagion of liberalism. The mere existence of democracies on their borders, the global free flow of information they cannot control, the dangerous connection between free market capitalism and political freedom—all pose a threat to rulers who depend on keeping resistive forces in their own countries in check. The continual challenge to the legitimacy of their rule posed by the U.S.-supported democratic order has therefore naturally made them hostile both to that order and to the United States.

But, until recently, a preponderance of domestic and international forces has dissuaded them from confronting the order directly. Chinese rulers have had to worry about what an unsuccessful confrontation with the United States might do to their legitimacy at home. Even Vlad the Impaler Putin, has only pushed against open doors, in Syria, and Ukraine, where the United States responded passively to his probes. He has been far more cautious when confronted by even marginal U.S. and European opposition, in the Baltic states.

During the era of American primacy and supremacy, China and Russia have participated in and for the most part been the greatest beneficiaries of the open international economic system, the United States created and helps sustain. And so long as that system functions, they have always had more to gain by playing in it, than by challenging and overturning it.

Still the greatest check on Chinese and Russian ambitions has been the military and not the economic power of the United States and its allies in Europe and Asia. NATO is where the buck stops and not the World Trade Agreements…

Screen Shot 2017-03-23 at 11.25.46 AM

As for imperial China, and its new ambitions for the Middle Kingdom, although increasingly powerful, has had to contemplate facing the combined military and economic strength of the world’s superpower and some very formidable regional powers linked by alliance or common strategic interests. This alliance groupage includes Japan, India, and South Korea, as well as smaller but still potent nations like Vietnam and Australia.

On the other hand, Russia has had to face the United States and its NATO allies on all fronts all around it’s territories. And when united, these U.S.-led alliances present a daunting challenge to a revisionist power that can call on few allies of its own for assistance.

Even were the Chinese to score an early victory in a conflict, such as the military subjection of Taiwan or a naval battle in the South, or East China Sea, they would have to contend over time with the combined industrial productive capacities of some of the world’s richest and most technologically advanced nations and the likely cutoff of access to foreign markets on which their own economy depends.

A weaker Russia, with its depleted population and oil- and gas-dependent economy, would face an even greater challenge.

For decades, the strong global position enjoyed by the United States and its allies has discouraged any serious challenge. So long as the United States was perceived as a dependable ally, Chinese and Russian leaders feared that aggressive moves would backfire and possibly bring their regimes down. This is what the political scientist William Wohlforth once described as the inherent stability of the unipolar order: As dissatisfied regional powers sought to challenge the status quo, their alarmed neighbors turned to the distant American superpower to contain their ambitions. And it worked. The United States stepped up, and Russia and China largely backed down—or were preempted before acting at all.

Faced with these obstacles, the best option for the two revisionist great powers has always been to hope for or, if possible, engineer a weakening of the U.S.-supported world order from within, either by separating the United States from its allies or by raising doubts about the U.S. commitment and thereby encouraging would-be allies and partners to forgo the strategic protection of the liberal world order and seek accommodation with its challengers.

The present system has therefore depended not only on American power but on coherence and unity at the heart of the democratic world. The United States has had to play its part as the principal guarantor of the order, especially in the military and strategic realm, but the order’s ideological and economic core—the democracies of Europe and East Asia and the Pacific—has also had to remain relatively healthy and confident.

In recent years, both pillars have been shaken loose of their foundations…

The democratic order has weakened and fractured at its core. Difficult economic conditions, the recrudescence of nationalism and tribalism, weak and uncertain political leadership and unresponsive mainstream political parties, and a new era of communications that seems to strengthen rather than weaken tribalism have together produced a crisis of confidence not only in the democracies but in what might be called the liberal enlightenment project. That project elevated universal principles of individual rights and common humanity over ethnic, racial, religious, national, or tribal differences. It looked to a growing economic interdependence to create common interests across boundaries and to the establishment of international institutions to smooth differences and facilitate cooperation among nations. Instead, the past decade has seen the rise of tribalism and nationalism, an increasing focus on the Other in all societies, and a loss of confidence in government, in the capitalist system, and in democracy.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.18.44 AM

We are witnessing the opposite of Francis Fukuyama’s “end of history.” History is returning with a vengeance and with it all the darker aspects of the human soul, including, for many, the perennial human yearning for a strong leader to provide firm guidance in a time of confusion and incoherence.

This crisis of the enlightenment project may have been inevitable, a recurring phenomenon produced by inherent flaws in both capitalism and democracy. In the 1930s, economic crisis and rising nationalism led many to doubt whether either democracy or capitalism was preferable to alternatives such as fascism and communism. And it is no coincidence that the crisis of confidence in liberalism accompanied a simultaneous breakdown of the strategic order. Then, the question was whether the United States as the outside power would step in and save or remake an order that Britain and France were no longer able or willing to sustain. Now, the question is whether the United States is willing to continue upholding the order that it created and which depends entirely on American power or whether Americans are prepared to take the risk—if they even understand the risk—of letting the order collapse into chaos and conflict.
That willingness has been in doubt for some time, well before the election of Trump and even before the election of Barack Obama. Increasingly in the quarter century after the end of the Cold War, Americans have been wondering why they bear such an unusual and outsized responsibility for preserving global order when their own interests are not always clearly served—and when the United States seems to be making all the sacrifices while others benefit.

Few remember the reasons why the United States took on this abnormal role after the calamitous two world wars of the 20th century. The millennial generation born after the end of the Cold War can hardly be expected to understand the lasting significance of the political, economic, and security structures established after World War II. Nor are they likely to learn much about it in high school and college textbooks obsessed with noting the evils and follies of American “imperialism.” Both the crises of the first half of the 20th century and its solution in 1945 have been forgotten.

As a consequence, the American public’s patience with the difficulties and costs inherent in playing that global role have worn thin. Whereas previous unsuccessful and costly wars, in Korea in 1950 and Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s, and previous economic downturns, such as with the energy crisis and crippling “stagflation” of the mid- to late 1970s, did not have the effect of turning Americans against global involvement, the unsuccessful wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and indeed in the whole of North Africa and the Middle East – have. It seems that today’s replay of the “Barbary Wars” has had the same effect on the American Public that the original Barbary wars had…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.22.46 AM

And we can blame the last five terrible Presidents along with the constant chronic cannabis smoking Obama, who pursued a Stoner’s dilemma as represented in his ambivalent and fully undecided approach towards global involvement. Yet for all five — the core strategy of America was retrenchment. But with Barack, it went into an extreme level of absurdity. As seen in all of his actions and all of his statements, he critiqued and repudiated previous American strategy and thus reinforced a national mood of passivity and just watching the news, but not being an active player in the world stage. Indeed as any stoner would attest – he would be favoring a much less active role in the world and a much narrower definition of American interests – because he simply didn’t care and couldn’t be bothered to give a damn. Evidence of this is that the Obama administration responded to the George W. Bush administration’s failures in Iraq and Afghanistan not by restoring American power and influence but by further reducing them. Although the administration promised to “rebalance” American foreign policy to Asia and the Pacific, in practice that meant reducing global commitments and accommodating revisionist powers at the expense of all the long held agreements for the guarantee of the Integrity and the Security of our very own Allies. And that is the straw that broke the Camel’s back: The question of our Allies’ security and sovereignty that the US failed to protect…

That is the death signal of the Empire and in Barack’s reflexive dismissal of the ideology of Winston Churchill as was evidently represented in his approach to redecorating the Oval Office by removing the Great Man’s bust – speaks volumes of Barack’s latent fury and underappreciation of the responsibility of his office.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.19.50 AM

Bailing out the boat is not easy, when the boat is swamped – yet the Obama administration’s early attempt to “reset” relations with Russia struck the first blow to America’s reputation as a reliable ally. Coming just after the Russian invasion of Georgia, it appeared to reward Moscow’s aggression. The reset also came at the expense of U.S. allies in Central Europe, as programs of military cooperation with Poland and the Czech Republic were jettisoned to appease the Kremlin. This attempt at accommodation, moreover, came just as Russian policy toward the West—not to mention Putin’s repressive policies toward his own people—was hardening. Far from eliciting better behavior by Russia, the reset emboldened Putin to push harder. Then, in 2014, the West’s inadequate response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and seizure of Crimea, though better than the Bush administration’s anemic response to the invasion of Georgia (Europe and the United States at least imposed sanctions after the invasion of Ukraine), still indicated reluctance on the part of the U.S. administration to force Russia back in its declared sphere of interest. Obama, in fact, publicly acknowledged Russia’s privileged position in Ukraine even as the United States and Europe sought to protect that country’s sovereignty. In Syria, the administration practically invited Russian intervention through Washington’s passivity, and certainly did nothing to discourage it, thus reinforcing the growing impression of an America in retreat across the Middle East (an impression initially created by the unnecessary and unwise withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Iraq). Subsequent Russian actions that increased the refugee flow from Syria into Europe also brought no American response, despite the evident damage of those refugee flows to European democratic institutions. The signal sent by the Obama administration was that none of this was really America’s problem.

In East Asia, the Obama administration undermined its otherwise commendable efforts to assert America’s continuing interest and influence. The so-called “pivot” proved to be mostly rhetoric. Inadequate overall defense spending precluded the necessary increases in America’s regional military presence in a meaningful way, and the administration allowed a critical economic component, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, to die in Congress, chiefly a victim of its own party’s opposition. The pivot also suffered from the general perception of American retreat and retrenchment, encouraged both by presidential rhetoric and by administration policies, especially in the Middle East. The premature, unnecessary, and strategically costly withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, followed by the accommodating agreement with Iran on its nuclear program, and then by the failure to hold the line on threats to use force against Syria’s president, was noticed around the world.

Despite the Obama administration’s insistence that American strategy should be geared toward Asia, U.S. allies have been left wondering how reliable the U.S. commitment might be when facing the challenge posed by China. The Obama administration erred in imagining that it could retrench globally while reassuring allies in Asia that the United States remained a reliable partner.

The effect on the two great revisionist powers, meanwhile, has been to encourage greater efforts at revision. In recent years, both powers have been more active in challenging the order, and one reason has been the growing perception that the United States is losing both the will and the capacity to sustain it. The psychological and political effect of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the United States, which has been to weaken support for America’s global engagement across the board, has provided an opening.

It is a myth, prevalent among liberal democracies, that revisionist powers can be pacified by acquiescence to their demands. American retrenchment, by this logic, ought to reduce tensions and competition. Unfortunately, the opposite is more often the case. The more secure revisionist powers feel, the more ambitious they are in seeking to change the system to their advantage because the resistance to change appears to be lessening. Just look at both China and Russia: Never in the past two centuries have they enjoyed greater security from external attack than they do today. Yet both remain dissatisfied and have become increasingly aggressive in pressing what they perceive to be their growing advantage in a system where the United States no longer puts up as much resistance as it used to.

The two great powers have differed, so far, chiefly in their methods. China has until now been the more careful, cautious, and patient of the two, seeking influence primarily through its great economic clout and using its growing military power chiefly as a source of deterrence and regional intimidation. It has not resorted to the outright use of force yet, although its actions in the South China Sea are military in nature, with strategic objectives. And while Beijing has been wary of using military force until now, it would be a mistake to assume it will continue show such restraint in the future—possibly the near future. Revisionist great powers with growing military capabilities invariably make use of those capabilities when they believe the possible gains outweigh the risks and costs. If the Chinese perceive America’s commitment to its allies and its position in the region to be weakening, or its capacity to make good on those commitments to be declining, then they will be more inclined to attempt to use the power they are acquiring in order to achieve their objectives. As the trend lines draw closer, this is where the first crisis is likely to take place.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.16.11 AM

Russia has been far more aggressive. It has invaded two neighboring states—Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014—and in both cases hived off significant portions of those two nations’ sovereign territory. Given the intensity with which the United States and its allies would have responded to such actions during the four decades of the Cold War, their relative lack of a response must have sent quite a signal to the Kremlin—and to others around the world. Moscow then followed by sending substantial forces into Syria. It has used its dominance of European energy markets as a weapon. It has used cyber-warfare against neighboring states. It has engaged in extensive information warfare on a global scale.

More recently, the Russian government has deployed a PR and certainly a soft power “weapon” that the Chinese either lack or have so far chosen not to deploy. That is the ability to interfere directly in Western electoral processes, both to influence their outcomes and more generally to discredit the democratic system. Russia funds right-wing populist parties across Europe, including in France; uses its media outlets to support favored candidates and attack others; has disseminated “fake news” to influence voters, most recently in Italy’s referendum; and has hacked private communications in order to embarrass those it wishes to defeat. This past year, Russia for the first time employed this powerful weapon against the United States, by allegedly interfering in the American electoral process.

Although Russia, by any measure, is the weaker of the two great powers, it has so far had more success than China in accomplishing its objective of dividing and disrupting the West, through its interference in Western democratic political systems, its information warfare, and its role in creating increased refugee flows from Syria into Europe. All of these have contributed to the sapping of European strength, and confidence in their sovereign governments, in their political systems, and in their established political parties. Russia’s military intervention in Syria, when contrasted with American passivity in that conflict, has truly exacerbated all the existing doubts about America’s staying power in the region.

Even Beijing, until recently, has succeeded mostly in driving American allies closer to the United States out of concern for growing Chinese power — but that was their early miscalculation and it could change quickly, especially now that they realize their mistake and watch as the United States continues on its present trajectory in the Pacific…

Screen Shot 2016-07-10 at 3.20.29 PM

There are signs that regional powers are already recalculating: East Asian countries are contemplating regional trade agreements that need not include the United States or, in the case of the Philippines, are actively courting China, while a number of nations in Eastern and Central Europe are moving closer to Russia, both strategically and ideologically. We could soon face a situation where both great revisionist powers are acting aggressively, including by military means, posing extreme challenges to American and global security in two regions at once.

All this comes as Americans continue to signal their reluctance to uphold the world order they created after World War II.

And now President Donald Trump who was not the only major political figure in this past election season to call for a much narrower definition of American interests and a lessening of the burdens of America’s global leadership, has come to exercise the mantle of Leadership for the Western Civilization, we are at an inflection point. All parts of the American political spectrum, seek disengagement. President Obama and Bernie Sanders both expressed a version of “America First.” The candidate who spoke often of America’s “indispensable” global role lost, and even Hillary Clinton felt compelled to jettison her earlier support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership because it was a sucker punch to the American public.

And even though at the very least, there should be doubts about the American public’s willingness to continue supporting the international alliance structure, denying the revisionist powers their desired spheres of influence and regional hegemony, and upholding democratic and free market norms in the international system – is a must today if you even want to consider yourself a contender and participant in the Grand Game.

But we all know that there is a war of civilization going on.

Don’t we know it?


Screen Shot 2017-03-08 at 1.40.48 PM


It is a war and is not a game, but even if it were a game after all, and coming as it does at a time of growing great-power competition, this narrowing definition of American interests and it’s disengagement from the Grand Game and World Affairs will likely take away all of our winnings from this high stakes poker game, and also hasten a return to the instability and clashes of previous eras, that will require us to play for keeps if we are not to lose our very own existence.

I speak thus because the weakness at the core of the democratic world and the shedding by the United States of global responsibilities have already encouraged a more aggressive revisionism by the dissatisfied powers, and by the ideologically more virulent enemies that seek to place us out of the game permanently and forever. And if you are a student of History you know that can be achieved easily and forever, if the other Ten Thousand empires are to be remembered at all, through Herodotus’ Histories.

That, our defeatist attitude of today has in turn, further sapped the democratic world’s confidence and willingness to resist, the virulent Islam and all the other cataclysmic ideologies of darkness – is evident of the Democratic party of America that caters to all these dark matter forces hoping to appear as a vote getter of the minorities, and completely failing to see the dynamic forces of History arrayed against us.

Please do not flinch, but I am sorry to tell you, that History suggests that this is a downward spiral from which it will be very difficult to recover, absent a rather dramatic shift of course by the United States of America.
The weakness at the core of the democratic world and the shedding by the United States of global responsibilities have already encouraged a more aggressive revisionism by the dissatisfied powers.

That shift may come too late today same as it was in the 1920s, and not the 1930s, that the democratic powers made the most important and ultimately fatal decisions for their future. After the 20’s the Second World War became inevitable. Same as the American disillusionment and cynicism with the First World War, led the United States to reject playing a major strategic role in preserving the peace in Europe and Asia, even though America was the only nation powerful enough to play that role at that time. Surely the weak Leaders and leading US politicians of that time ought to be blamed here, because the withdrawal of the United States helped undermine the will of Britain and France, and encouraged Germany in Europe, and Japan in Asia, to take increasingly aggressive actions to achieve regional dominance.

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 3.59.34 PM

Still most American Leaders were convinced that nothing that happened in Europe or Asia could affect their security. It took the first two years of Britain fighting alone and defending Western Civilization all by itself during the first part of the Second World War, before the dastardly attack on Pearl harbor convinced America that they needed to show up and fight. Yet to the appeasers even that was a mistake. The “return to normalcy” of the 1920 election seemed safe and innocent at the time, but the essentially selfish policies pursued by the world’s strongest power in the following decades after the first World War, helped set the stage for the calamities of the 1930s, and the horrors of the bloodiest War in history of the 1940’s, the Second World War.

But the lesson lost here is that by the time the war crises began to erupt, it was already too late to avoid paying the high price of global conflict.

It is in such times, that it has always been tempting to believe that geopolitical competition can be channeled or even resolved through mutual efforts at cooperation and accommodation via Soft Power. The idea, recently proposed by Niall Ferguson, that the world can be ruled jointly by the United States, Russia, and China, is not a new one. Such condominiums have been proposed and attempted in every era when the dominant power or powers in the international system sought to fend off challenges from the dissatisfied revisionist powers. It has rarely worked. Revisionist great powers are not easy to satisfy short of complete capitulation. Their sphere of influence is never quite large enough to satisfy their pride or their expanding need for security. In fact, their very expansion creates insecurity, by frightening neighbors and leading them to band together against the rising power.


The satiated power that Otto von Bismarck spoke of is rare. The German leaders who succeeded him were not satisfied even with being the strongest power in Europe. In their efforts to grow still stronger, they produced coalitions against them, making their fear of “encirclement” a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Hapsburgs, and the AustroHungarian empire never failed this test… See where that got them.

This is a common trait of rising powers—their actions produce the very insecurity they claim to want to redress. They harbor grievances against the existing order (both Germany and Japan considered themselves the “have-not” nations), but their grievances cannot be satisfied so long as the existing order remains in place. Marginal concession is not enough, but the powers upholding the existing order will not make more than marginal concessions unless they are compelled to by superior strength. Japan, the aggrieved “have-not” nation of the 1930s, did not satisfy itself by taking Manchuria in 1931.

Germany, the aggrieved victim of Versailles, did not satisfy itself by bringing the Germans of the Sudetenland back into the fold. They demanded much more, and they could not persuade the democratic powers to give them what they wanted without resorting to war.

Yet we know that granting the revisionist powers, new spheres of influence is not a recipe for peace and tranquility, but rather an invitation to inevitable conflict.
Granting the revisionist powers spheres of influence is not a recipe for peace and tranquility but rather an invitation to inevitable conflict. Appeasers always get more than they bargained for. Dishonor, submission, and a war to follow — is usually their only gain.

Russia’s historical sphere of influence does not end in Ukraine. I tell you — it only begins in Ukraine, and it extends to all the Baltic States, to the Balkans, and to the heart of Central Asia just as much as Central Europe. And within Russia’s traditional sphere of influence, other nations do not enjoy autonomy or even sovereignty. There was no independent Poland under the Russian Empire nor under the Soviet Union. For China to gain its desired sphere of influence in East Asia will mean that, when it chooses, it can close the region off to the United States—not only militarily but politically and economically, too.


China will, of course, inevitably exercise great sway in its own region, as will Russia. The United States cannot and should not prevent China from being an economic powerhouse. Nor should it wish for the collapse of Russia. The United States should even welcome competition of a certain kind. Great powers compete across multiple planes—economic, ideological, and political, as well as military. Competition in most spheres is necessary and even healthy. Within the liberal order, China can compete economically and successfully with the United States; Russia can thrive in the international economic order upheld by the democratic system, even if it is not itself democratic.

But military and strategic competition is different. The security situation undergirds everything else. It remains true today as it has since World War II that only the United States has the capacity and the unique geographical advantages to provide global security and relative stability. There is no stable balance of power in Europe or Asia without the United States. And while we can talk about “soft power” and “smart power,” they have been and always will be of limited value when confronting raw military power. Despite all of the loose talk of American decline, it is in the military realm where U.S. advantages remain clearest. Even in other great powers’ backyards, the United States retains the capacity, along with its powerful allies, to deter challenges to the security order. But without a U.S. willingness to maintain the balance in far-flung regions of the world, the system will buckle under the unrestrained military competition of regional powers. Part of that willingness entails defense spending commensurate with America’s continuing global role.

For the United States to accept a return to spheres of influence would not calm the international waters. It would merely return the world to the condition it was in at the end of the 19th century, with competing great powers clashing over inevitably intersecting and overlapping spheres. These unsettled, disordered conditions produced the fertile ground for the two destructive world wars of the first half of the 20th century. The collapse of the British-dominated world order on the oceans, the disruption of the uneasy balance of power on the European continent as a powerful unified Germany took shape, and the rise of Japanese power in East Asia all contributed to a highly competitive international environment in which dissatisfied great powers took the opportunity to pursue their ambitions in the absence of any power or group of powers to unite in checking them. The result was an unprecedented global calamity and an orgy of death and mayhem on an epic scale.

It has been the great accomplishment of the U.S.-led world order in the 70 years since the end of World War II that this kind of competition has been held in check and great power conflicts have been avoided. It will be more than a shame if Americans were to destroy what they created—and not because it was no longer possible to sustain it, but simply because they chose to stop trying.

Just think of how far we have all come today. Yet we have far more we have to go before we sleep…

Please do not forget the betrayal that led to the fall of the “City” in 1453

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 2.23.24 PM

And that is the fork on the road that we should take today. Because the road hard as is leading up, moving steeply towards World Leadership all over again. And we have to take to the hills and the mountains, in order to regain that rightful position again — some day soon.

With empty coffers and emptier armories — we have to use subterfuge and cunning, and the rich resource of bluster, to outmaneuver them all. And because our enemies are legion and are thriving at our own expense, we should cut off their money flows.

And to do that we have to make the world trade reposition itself so that it will deposit the Surpluses to the United States of America and not to the increasingly ambitious communist pariahs and Islamic World Jihadist powers who fuel their crazy Caliphate dreams through our own petrodollars. Let’s cut them off at the knees and see how long the Saudi Wahabis will stay in power along with the two great revisionist power leaders, the Russian and the Chinese power dwellers.

We can either make for a complete nightmare of beasts and strange creatures that attack and devour the very Western Civilization that we are tasked to protect and save from Extinction – or we can exterminate the rodents and the cockroaches through muscular trade and economic Surpluses and Diplomatic finesse, pushed through the muzzles of the gunboats and the drones’ missiles.

Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 4.00.29 PM

The other major problem, is the declining testosterone, the loss of confidence, and the lack of capacity, and will that the democratic world, and especially the United States, exhibit today. And that causes us to be unable to even maintain the dominant position we have held in the international system since 1945. And as those two lines move closer, and as the declining will and capacity of the United States and its allies to maintain the present world order — meet the youthful strength, the increasing desire, and the adolescent capacity of the Islamic cancer to spread – we find ourselves at the throes of Hades. On the other hand, as the revisionist powers seek to unseat us and change the World Order System we guard — we will reach the moment at which the existing order collapses and the world descends into a phase of brutal anarchy, as it has three times in the last century, and innumerable times in our past History.

And then we shall be remembered in the History books as alternatively powerful and weak, but very little will survive of our Truth and of our Beauty. Just look at Istanbul today and try to discern the Imperial Greco Roman Landmarks, or the greatest Christian Cathedral the world has ever known, or the People’s monuments to Free Thinking, to great Philosophical ideals, or to Reason, and to the worshipful Christianity of a strong Moral Republic, and the memory of the Rule of Law preserved amongst Free People, and their aspirations for a Democratic Republic with an Emperor at it’s helm… All of it has been effaced and it’s long lasting history as the seat of the Roman Empire for more than a Thousand years has been fully erased in favor of an Asiatic doctrinaire and dogmatic barbaric faith of Islam.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 2.24.11 PM

Sadly all of that past glory has been erased and effaced from the fabric of that most ancient of Great Imperial Cities. So now we have to contend with the same in our recent past as well, because it is all now lost in a sea of submission to Islamic dogma and subterfuge of corruption, that Koran promotes as intellectual and bodily human slavery. This is the Istanbul, now monument to the virulent and hateful form of Islam, the Gazi, the Jihad, and all that jazz. As for the temples and the cathedrals, they have all been converted to mosques and Islamic museums. If only “Agia Sophia” could speak to tell the tale of what would happen to you, when Islam takes over America — many of you would sit up straight to listen.

Thus is how Statesmanship conducted, Civilization created, and History recorded.

And History is always written in the hopes of preserving our Memory from decay.

And maybe that will be changed too, and then maybe the future generations of students will learn that Islam and the Barbary Pirates, were truly the ones that built America… Or some similar horseshoe like that coming from the mouth of an Islamic President.

But that dishonor shall not pass. It will not pass. Not if we have anything to say about it.

Are you with me, Patriots, or with the ISIS and the Stupid Caliphate, and those of you and the Dems who are pining for the return to the Dark Ages?

Is that really what You want?


Here is where Winston Churchill clearly and vehemently disagrees with the way things are going and recommends to change all that, through strong & decisive action.

I hope President Trump is listening.

To be continued…

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 18, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 11)

Just this past year, with the pomp and the colossal amounts of circumstance, befitting a rodeo or a county fair, we entered the American Presidential Electoral season.

And we did this without much polish, but with plenty of platitudes, and semi-coherent inanities, dripping from the open mouths of half baked and some fully baked candidates. Thus the 2016 presidential campaign went underway for the Soul of America. Of course it had all began almost eight years earlier when Obama made a deal with Hillary Clinton that he would support her for the top job after his time was up.

Deal making on the back of People’s Democracy.

That’s the vast corruption of the liberal left and of the Democrats who are making these unholy deals and are enforcing them via their power of the DNC and of the Obama White House led by their islamic fundamentalists.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 12.03.19 PM

Of course to enforce this idiocy one needs useful fools and daft tools, like Valerie Jarrett, who operated at the highest levels of Power, while being a secretive admirer of Iran and her Ayatollahs. Valerie Jarrett went as far as micromanaging president Obama himself, because she came form that particularly corrupt world of Chicago Municipal Politics and she had hired Michelle Obama back then and it follows that since Valerie was Michelle’s boss, and Michelle was Barack’s boss — then Valerie was Barracks bond too. Indeed she was his manager prior to this gig, for their days in Chicago where they first took a shine to each other…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 12.02.46 PM

Of course any deal between Barry and Hilly, as always has to be approved by Bill, and it has to be a “Pay To Play” deal. That is SOP [Standard Operating procedure] and is the only kind of deal the Clintons and the Obamas would have allowed to stand. So this deal was not different. For his side of the deal, Obama promised her the capacity to make unlimited loads of cash, and also get the support of the Bankers – provided that the Clinton Democrats won’t make trouble for him, and allow him to sell the country to the Banker-Wanker class of Special Interests. If you don’t believe me – just think of why did he give the job of forming a government to the CityBank Execs who also threw a bone to Ms Clinton and gave her the State Department job to keep her in the those nice & tight little golden handcuffs, to make sure to enrich her and own her appropriately. Still only Hillary Clinton prepared her run for the last eight years seemingly unopposed, and thus amassed a huge war chest and in the minds of the Special Interests, the Media, and her Handlers – she was scheduled to win hands down.

As for the Republicans, and the rest of the world, besides the crooked DNC and the crooked Hillary machine — the electoral season began in December of 2015, when the former Florida Governor Jeb Bush announced he was “actively exploring” a run for the White House. And although Jeb Bush is a weak man and stands far to the left of where much of the Republican base stands — on many issues —  his name identification is strong, with two ex-Presidents in his immediate family. Yet he was perhaps too weak to win his party’s nomination, according to statistical analysis. On foreign policy issues, however, Bush towed a hawkish line, pushing for a more aggressive U.S. posture against Syria, Russia, Iran, China, and Cuba in order to better promote and defend American ideals and interests throughout the globe.

On the whole, the Republican hopefuls thought that we’re “racing to the right” on foreign policy, arguing for a more muscular approach to international affairs. A strong narrative was taking hold, that many of the problems facing the world today are the result of the Obama Biden administrations’ “failed leadership.” More specifically, they were not brought about by America’s ill-conceived actions, but instead, because of U.S. inaction: a failure to intervene as often or aggressively as “needed” around the world, which to many conservatives’ minds projected American weakness and undermined U.S. credibility.

The solution?

Clear principled American leadership.

This line of reasoning permeated also the campaigns of noted surgeon Ben Carson, and Texas Senator Ted Cruz, and increasingly reflected the political strategy of Kentucky Senator Rand Paul as well as Florida Senator Marco Rubio’s admittedly weak simpleton personality and character.

On the other side the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, who upon good forensic evidence — stole the primary elections from Democratic Socialist and ultra Liberal Bernie Sanders and his posse of disruptors; is perhaps even more aggressive still. Sure she is unwavering in her supposed advocacy of Israel, but she also supported the Iran Nuclear deal that has put Iran onto the Nuclear power club. But to just show strength in other areas she has been comparing Putin to Hitler over Ukraine, and the lady Secretary has been pushing for a more confrontational approach to China, while continuing to champion her silly form of Arab Spring messy interventions in Libya and Syria. This has always been her downfall. Her meddlesome and criminally corrupt ways. She does this often and she thinks it is correct, just as she previously did for Iraq, supporting the troop surge in Afghanistan as well, as the ill-fated campaign of first arming the Islamic militants and once they declared themselves the Caliphate turning against them belatedly. So now that she says that she is truly against ISIL, while defending the counterproductive drone program, and arguing for increased sanctions and the threat of force against Iran — nobody believes her. And although she really supports the nuclear deal that Obama and Kerry foisted upon the American people — she also admits that this deal is what allows the nuclear efforts of Iran to continue. And to top it all off — she wants to take away the guns of the American people…


And she wants to limit Free Speech too.

With one stone she wants to kill two “birds” or rather Two Amendments of the Constitution — that is if she were ever able to become the President of the land. And that is precisely why she shall never become one…

Good thing President Trump obstructed Hillary from ever reaching that exalted position. Well Done Donny Boy… Well Done.

Mind you, that during Hillary’s pre-announcement book tour, Clinton lambasted the Obama administration’s foreign policy, particularly the administration’s aspirational credo: “Don’t do stupid stuff.” Her complaint was not that the Obama administration has failed to live up to such a modest goal, but instead, that “don’t do stupid stuff” is not an organizing principle, and America instead needs doctrines to guide its foreign policy. Speaking as if her tutor Henry Kissinger was speaking through her or as if she was channelling the 1970s all over again…

Daft and Stupid.

Or Stupid and Daft…

Can’t decide…

Methinks the 1970s will come calling and ask her for their Foreign Policy back.

As for her criticism of “Not doing evil” as a bad policy — well that is a plain as day Clintonian absurdity.

Clearly, “avoid doing harm” is, in fact a great maxim. It is also designed as a guiding action. If you don’t believe me — just ask any medical professional. It’s the Physician’s oath of Hippocrates, and it serves for a Thousand years as a principle guiding what not to do. Rather than what to do, but for that very reason, it is the basis of, and more important than, any offensive strategy. Because it constrains what sorts of affirmative policies are desirable or even permissible — let alone par for the course to be engaged into.

But notwithstanding this apparent lack of understanding of the daft Madame about what “organizing principle” means, there is a more profound error that crooked Secretary Clinton holds in common with the majority of the Republican 2016 candidates, except Donald Trump: The assumption that grand strategies are necessary, and that Doctrinaire belief and SOP are useful in guiding foreign policy, and achieving optimal outcomes.

Yet as any smart student of Winston Churchill could tell you:

“They aren’t.”

They aren’t, because there are major Problems with “Grand Strategies” and with the fixed doctrinaire mental attitudes of their adherents, as it pertains to understanding the world and the Art of Strategy, and Statecraft.

Statesmanship does not come out of the bottle….

Fixed fortifications like the Maginot lines, never stopped anyone from going around them.

Capice Madame?


Capice Madame Secretary?

Let’s see if Hillary and the liberal Democrats have learned anything from all of these writings, as they feverishly prepare for the 2020 Presidential Elections — hoping to reclaim the White House.

Yet perhaps first they should study themselves and learn about their own limitations…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.15.20 AM

Old Charles Darwin told us quite some time ago that it is not the richest, the most corrupt, the most crooked, nor the most connected, nor the Mass Media supported, nor the dressed up smartest, nor the most big ass beautiful, nor the feminist member of the species that survives. And certainly where Elections are concerned it is not the one that is most ramrod straight, iron fisted, or inflexible, and wearing those detestable Dictator body suits, like Chairman Mao’s tailor sewed up for Madame Secretary in all the colors of the rainbow for this particularly pear shaped unicorn. And it is absolutely not the one that has grand yet fixed strategy ideas, and iron limiting beliefs, or doctrinal aspirations. Statesmanship is not for those that have a lot of fixed artillery, but for the ones with mobile artillery and for those who can easily unleash a fast shifting field of fire upon the enemy.

Indeed it is the most malleable, flexible, and fluid, people whose ideas can be seen to always be adjusting and adopting to changing circumstances. That indeed is the only Statesman acting as a foreign policy animal; that will survive and thrive.

Got That?

To understand why foreign policy doctrines are counterproductive, let us begin with a handful of humble axioms:

First, situations are importantly different from one another. Libya is not Ukraine. The Syria of the 1950s is neither the Syria of 2011, nor the Syria of 2014.

The many crises America faces today are not the same as those of Rome at the time of its collapse, nor anything like those the British empire faced. And while drawing analogies can sometimes be useful, taking historical and geographical out of place comparisons too far and far too seriously — will only serve to obscure and obfuscate, rather than elucidate the problems policymakers are currently faced with. A policymaker’s over reliance on historical tropes is a sign that they probably lack a nuanced grasp on the actual situation at hand — and are likely not well-informed about history, either, and therefore doomed to fail.

Secondly, situations are fluid and often volatile: they evolve over time in response to myriad factors, most of which are difficult to predict or control. Therefore, mindfulness of the present will be far more useful in guiding policy than attempts to model the future, draw analogies from the past, or frame contemporary developments within pre-existing narratives.

Thirdly, U.S. interest, and the optimal means of promoting them, are also heavily context-dependent and evolve along with the situation to which they’re indexed. Accordingly, strategies which take American interests for granted are likely to be blind to critical opportunities and risks presented by particular circumstances.

Fourthly, even what is morally right is heavily determined by the context in which options are presented — both at the personal and institutional levels.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.16.57 AM

In light of these propositions, we are left with the question: why would policymakers approach fluid and dynamic problems through rigid principles and reactionary applications?

Let’s first tackle the Incentive Problem which is rather disturbing, in that policymakers seem so willing to embrace policies driven by ideology or abstract projection at the expense of paying attention to the facts on the ground, or even in outright defiance of known empirical realities.

But worse still is that even as it becomes glaringly obvious that these ill-conceived measures are failing, or even backfiring, the typical response by policymakers is to explain problems away with empty counterfactual explanations about how the strategy is essentially sound, and could even have worked better under alternative circumstances. After a show for the press and media, the proposed “solution” typically is to double-down on the current policies, rather than to rethink their Strategy, their tactics and thus revise the failing aims and ineffective methods. You can fill here the blanks about the US middle East policy, the doubling down on Afghanistan, Iraq and all other failed campaigns at war footing, the US has undertaken during the last six Presidents’ tenures.

And if you are anything like me and choose to follow the reality train – you recognize this malaise because this is virtually the definition of fundamentalism. Doctrinaire belief is faith based and truly resembles religious dogma. There is no space for “Pure Reason” there…

Screen Shot 2017-05-15 at 11.42.57 AM

And yet, after all this knowledge has become available out there — it still never fails to surprise me that fundamental nationalists, or the plain vanilla old nationalists, or even old school religious fundamentalists – are the ones who customarily win these elections. Nothing gave the militant terrorist organizations, like the Islamic Brotherhood, or ISIS, or even rogue states like Iran and North Korea, more freedom to operate, than this inflexible approach to Foreign policy. And in some cases, we give them the “license” to form governments up and down the Middle East, like the US inspired, faultily designed, and stupidly unleashed “Arab Spring” that was the handiwork of the famous Obama – Clinton partnership and the Tech smart cookies relying on Facebook and Twitter to change the world. You can sit down now and see what a giant waste of blood, souls, and manpower this whole stupid exercise there was.

Indeed, we’ve seen how badly this played out for all of us, and especially for the poor people of Egypt, Libya, Algiers, Tunis, Syria, and the whole lot of Northern Africa and the Middle East.

And this is no less true in America either, as it is in the Middle East — during the wake of the Arab Uprisings. It is a problem so intrinsic to democracy itself, same as the blowback of the dissatisfied Muslim fundamentalists the have been displaced and now stream into America as refugees seeking to effect some measure of “Blowback” against our country.

So while doctrines generally give rise to terrible policies, they also make excellent sound bites, and provide for political slogans. The public loves the melodrama created by the apparent clashes of these lofty ideals, and the Politicos are lapping it up. So go ahead and give it to them, albeit with a bit of ketchup… to remind them of the vast rivers of blood these policies spill.

Perhaps more importantly, because the voters like simple narratives about what is happening and why; they will also like hopeful and bold (even if poorly substantiated) visions of the future.

Our constituents want complex issues related and explained in an accessible fashion, short enough to fit between commercial breaks, distill into an op-ed column, or squeeze into a 140-character tweet. And so, for these reasons, voters are more likely to elect someone who has some neat, tidy ideological package to offer — rather than the intellectual who has command of all the subjects yet little belief in any of them. And this may be why Americans, despite being generally and consistently averse to military interventions, tend to elect politicians who are likely to resort to force to resolve foreign policy challenges, while decrying their political opponents as “weak” or “isolationist” or even sanctimonious poseurs.

If we want to avoid that — then we have to confront our own short-sightedness and skewed vision, with pragmatism and realpolitik to replace our abundantly flawed idealism and populism — as the new doctrinaire approach.

Perhaps the one exception to the aforementioned trend has been the original Nixon-Kissinger team themselves, who had tended to base critical policy decisions on what the public wanted in the moment, albeit with a delayed reaction — rather than subscribing to any particular doctrine of political party affiliation. It worked so well as you might well remember that the people thought that they can keep the Nixon Kissinger doctrine alive and on life support all the way to Barack Obama’s presidency. Which is an idiotic policy idea because it caters to the constantly shifting whims of the media led and ill informed populace that is not very much interested to educate themselves in the nuances of Foreign Policy. And yet ironically, many voters even resented him for his “whoring” himself to the public, as these elections clearly underscored.

Indeed it is hard to blame them, because the man was elected to LEAD and not to FOLLOW. Yet nobody said that this silver tongued demagogue was anything else but a gift horse to the Big Banks and to the Establishment Oligarchy. Indeed Barack has always been a shallow fellow with little if any ideological value besides his abiding belief in the stoner’s herb — his cannabis smoke…

Yet today we have to confront reality because even those that think that Americans are notoriously ignorant and reactionary about issues related to foreign affairs and national security, and far too disengaged from our military — know that on a guttural level all Americans know all that’s necessary about their Leaders and their Government and can “smell” or “ferret” out all the rest. And because of that, we have the good fortune of living in a representative, rather than direct democracy, where citizens elect politicians who are supposed to have the temperament, the courage, the balls, and the informational analysis and problem solving expertise, necessary to make tough, often controversial, decisions on their behalf.

And while accountable to the citizens via occasional elections, precisely what American politicians are not supposed to do is reflexively defer to the public in the interim.

The properly maligned & malignant foreign policy track record of the Obama administration should serve as a cautionary tale for why not to do what Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry did.

Because if you are the occupant of the White House, working at the Resolute desk, inside the Oval Office, YOU MUST LEAD – AND NOT FOLLOW…


American leadership of the last six Presidents doesn’t lack it’s share of populism or idealism — but what it really lacked is pragmatism. But the progressive narrative goes that given the proclivities of the American voter, perhaps the best that one can hope for is leaders who are great at exploiting narrative tropes to explain their policies to the public, while their actions are determined by careful, informed, and realistic assessments of the challenges the U.S. faces. In a sense they want Leaders who lie to the people like Ms Clinton and Mr Obama did.

However the conservative belief is that Americans shouldn’t hold their breath in anticipation of such a noble and masterful liar anytime soon because we already had one Barack Obama and we clearly don’t need another.

Furthermore, we have now got a far better Chief today in the House, who says and does exactly what he believes in, since he is not a career politician. That is true because the White House occupant now is Donald Trump. And Trump is a man who doesn’t like to play these nasty women’s games, and instead rocks the House with bravado and effective management. And although our politicians in total, tend to be cynical in all the wrong ways – sometimes this cynicism allows a true believer like Trump, to slip through the cracks, because all the others are killing themselves with their own gudgeons of false reality.


Winston Churchill feels far removed from these ideological falsities of the liberal elites that are used to control the population as plantation politics from the Democratic party all over again.

To be continued…

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 18, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 10)

Here is the situation today.

In a flash retrospective of the American state, the Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, & Obama Presidencies, have all for various reasons diminished the American Power. That has happened because they largely wanted to be liked around the world instead of being respected…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.06.12 AM

This is exactly what Benjamin Franklin cautioned us against: ”

"Many paths lead to success but only one leads inevitably to failure; That which consists of wanting to please everybody" 

And yet since the Nixon administration’s time, it appears that all the rest have failed us, by simply following the ideologically frail and politically faulty, yet popular amongst NeoCons “Kissinger Doctrine” of Globalization through a multipolar World Order. This wet squib of a useless idea has already seen it’s day i the sun, and has already had it’s powerful adherents like Wolfowitz, and his followers in power, who have gradually led America away from her world leading position. It is time to retire it to the dustbin of history, because although it has been a “treasured” intellectual position, this is opposite to all the Power of Inertia, that has been the default US policy since the Victory of the Second World War. And it is that institutional inertia that has maintained law & order, and prevented great power clashes on this globe for over 70 years. Yet today under the fashionable and hip policies of the Think Tanks, this working policy has been wasting greatly in the altar of wars of attrition, and globalization the NeoCon thought and ideology doctrine have driven us to…

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.30.22 AM

And all of these Presidents coming after Nixon — instead of stopping the rot and the gradual decline to a non sensical and doctrinaire policy — they have quietly assigned America “voluntarily” to the role of the Referee. And on top of that she has to pay for the privilege of maintaining the alliance and its burdens.

Not Fair – Not Smart – Not Acceptable. And Certainly Not Practicable Any Longer.

That is the vast political and military mistake we have to get undone, because we are not the United Nations. We are the United States of America and better start behaving like it. Otherwise we are going to live in a world where Russia and China exploit all the opportunities presented to us in order to exert their will and create vast spheres of influence and challenge us continuously for Global Dominance leading to World War and Existential conflicts.

And Winston Churchill understood that language of power quite well, especially since his early days spending in Paris with his Mother, where instead of socializing with the pretty French girls and practicing the “Langue D’Amour” — he resolutely dived deeply into Signor Michelle De Montaigne’s essays and Political Philosophy lie a person thirsting for wisdom…

That is when Winston learned well, these imitable words of Signor Montaigne: “Beaucoup de chemns menent a la reussite mais un seule mene immanquablement a l’echec; celui qui consiste a vouloir plaire a tout le monde.”

Many paths lead to success but only one leads inevitably to failure; That which consists of wanting to please everybody

These words that most American Presidents haven’t yet learned with the notable exceptions of Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Richard Nixon, and today’s President Donald Trump…

These badass Presidents above have indeed changed the course of History, because they didn’t give a damn about whether snowflakes liked them or not. They just did what they had to do. And that is ultimately the strongest executive decision a President gets to make…

Everything else stems from that.

And this is what Winston Churchill studied hard and learned during his long days in Paris, while his Mother romanced all comers.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.18.03 AM

Who amongst you have ever read Monsieur Michelle Montaigne?


Certainly none of the US President of new vintage, has ever read Montaigne.

And yet he is the crucible of Political philosophy and Statesmanship.

He spoke about International Stability before it was a key word of international diplomacy. Indeed he said everything there is to say about Statesmanship before anyone else even had the chance to think about it.

Still most American Presidents tend to forget him,  and choose to take the fundamental and inertial stability of the international order for granted. But history shows that which one takes for granted — tends to get disturbed and lost rather easily.

Same as world orders collapse and stability gets shattered. Public Safety then escapes and War reigns supreme, and this happens with the frequency of the gyrations of a gnat flittering around a candle in a summer night… And at this stage this balance has been disturbed as any astute observer of International Affairs can attest. Indeed our Balance and harmony have been shafted because the claimants to Supremacy n our World have grown to be legion. And what is left for us and the United States of America, is to recognize that we must sharply check the assertive, rising powers that challenge the Safety of the World with their antics.

Our challenges come from stable powers like those of China, Russia, and the EU; as well as the hugely unstable and rather volatile ones, like Militant Islam, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, North Korea, Pakistan, and latin America Communists.  It is up to a smart Statesman to address these issues forcefully — rather than accept their growing self importance, their increasing confidence, and their de facto enablement of becoming Nuclear Powers and thus having their own spheres of influence, and holding their own balance of terror.

Too many enemies?

Time for triage.

Perhaps we single out the biggest threats and pick them off one by one. Start with Iran and North Korea. However you slice it Russia when the chips are down, can easily be a strong ally for the U.S. in solving this problem, because not only we are both exposed to the same Natural enemies, through the sharing of our common faith, and our strong belief in our Natural Christian moorings — but because North Korea is a Chinese puppet and Russia wants to upstage China right about now… and Iran is a logical enemy of Russia with it’s meddlesome and militant Islamic ideology.

We are of course competitors with the Russkies, but competitive feelings help. Some smoke up the ass, from the Dems about election interference and Russian hacking, is nothing more than hot air — but state competition aside, we can still talk, trade, and do battle together against the common enemies. Same as we did during the second World War when we fought the Godless armies of the Socialist moron named Hitler.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.52.43 AM

My primary observation of Politics in America today is that there is a strong shake up of the Political Spectrum, where all the segments of the traditional spectrum have been reassembled in a kaleidoscope of unusual shapes and unrecognizable groupings.

The main political parties are falling over themselves in their quest to identify themselves anew in an era of uncertainty and that in my mind is a good thing, because every time the old politicos stumble and fall is because of Disruption.
And this massive disruption presents a unique opportunity for people like us. The people of today’s Lincoln Party – same as it did the last time the Democratic party imploded and the Union was divided, and we got the Great Abraham Lincoln who came to power through an unlikely circumstance and a tear of a platform, that allowed him to govern strongly against impossible odds and with a small army managed to fight and win a bloody Civil War, in order to liberate and unite this beloved Republic.

The times of 1860’s greatly resemble the times of today. History repeats itself. It repeats itself often and in a rather elliptical style…

And the rise of Trump has given us hope today for a reply of these awful yet uplifting times. If only we could accomplish this much progress today without the vast bloodshed – I would be satisfied, but bloodletting is always the necessary ingredient to water the tree of Liberty and history.

And in this divide instance let’s look at the unlikely alliances that are forming everywhere. Alliances and in some cases symmetries that bring together a belief system equally shared among the Tea Party Patriots, the Occupy Wall Street protesters, the Bernie Sanders independently thinking Democrats, the liberal Socialists, and the young College educated Conservatives of the Lincoln Party, and even the rank & file GOP Republicans…

And the belief that they all share is this: A new America, free of the Tyranny of the Big Interests and free of the Big Government.

Especially amongst the young ones, I’ve observed a strong common bond and an easy crossing of the lines in their virulent hatred of the insidious alliance between big business, big political parties, big banks, big lobbying interests, big money, and big government.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 8.53.59 AM

And as it seems evident to any clear-eyed observer – all these people believe that the United States government should never be in the business of picking winners and losers in Life, or in Corporate America, or in Politics — and no person, organization, union, bank, lobby, or corporation should have their own key to the back door of our People’s government.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 8.54.22 AM

Because we all believe that Government by the people, from the people and for the people, should not perish from the face of this Earth.

Second, and contrary to popular belief, both liberals, and conservatives alike, are really concerned with the plight of the poor in this nation. But political correctness presents both of them in a very different light on their approaches towards solving the problem…


Yet it is only the Conservatives that are always accused of being uncompassionate, hateful, racist, and greedy, but studies have shown that when it comes to charitable giving, conservatives are far more generous than liberals in charitable giving & caring for the poor. Yet, the difference between the two camps, is not in their intrinsic attitudes towards the problem – but in their political, spiritual, and practical attitudes towards the solution of this vast and polarizing problem.

Conservatives believe that the government does practically nothing well, since without meritorious competition, or a profit motive, there is no incentive to do well, and that government interference has made the plight of the poor far worse than it would have ever been, had the government never gotten involved in the first place.


For a stark example of this, look no farther than the condition of the black family in America since the “War on Poverty” began. The old fashioned Liberals believe that more government is the answer, and that if we only throw more money at the problem, the problem will go away. It is an attitude of delegating the job to somebody else because they are lazy and ignorant of how the world works. Whereas the Conservatives truly believe, as Reagan so aptly stated, that Government is not the solution to our problems – but rather government is the problem, and therefore it is up to the Markets, the Good Will of Men, Personal Initiative, Philanthropy, and Free Enterprise that all together will magically conspire & cooperate, in order to solve this problem.

Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 10.59.45 AM

The third point is about Healthcare. Conservatives, are people who avail themselves of a doctor’s services as often as anyone else, and are just as concerned with the condition of America’s healthcare system as Liberals are. But while Conservatives believe that America has the world’s most capable physicians, has the world’s most innovative pharmaceutical industry, and is on the cutting edge of medical technology, albeit at high cost — they also understand that the HealthCare delivery system is far from perfect.

However, unlike Liberals, the Conservatives see a grave danger in turning the administration of that delivery system over to the same entity that is responsible for giving us the United States Postal Service, and it’s myriad of Postal workers and ballistic inefficiencies. There are very many private sector solutions that should certainly be explored before we kill the system altogether, by giving it to the government to run and administer.

So now that we’ve touched on a few points of common ground, allow me to explain the Conservative agenda towards the Liberal efforts to implement the Affordable Care Act and the so called “progressive” agenda.

First, let’s talk about the word “progressive”, since “Liberals” now seem to prefer that word to describe themselves. In order to label something as progressive or regressive, one must have some idea as to what constitutes progress.

So when we ask our friends of the Left to describe what is the ideal towards which they are striving – they have no idea what to say. Yet anyone with a high school diploma can tell you that an idea is considered progressive if it moves us closer to the ideal, and regressive if it moves us further away.

So, what is the ideal society for the Liberal Progressives out there?

Though I can’t begin to discern the thoughts of every liberal who may read this, nor can I assume that every liberal has the same notion of an ideal society — in my arguments with liberals over the years, I couldn’t help but notice the influence that FDR’s Second Bill of Rights has had in shaping the beliefs of the modern liberal progressive in regards to domestic policy.

The rights that FDR cited are:
1. The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
2. The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
3. The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
4. The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
5. The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
6. The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
7. The right to a good education.

And if you are the Socially Liberal progressive — at this point, you’re probably screaming, “Right on” and who can blame you?

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.25.03 AM

What sane person in the world doesn’t want everyone to be gainfully employed, adequately fed, smartly clothed, appropriately sheltered, and properly educated?

These are the goals of every moral society on the planet, however we cannot ignore the fundamental question that needs to be asked:

“At what cost can we offer all these to all the people?”

As a Lincoln party Conservative — I’m not sure whether FDR was a shallow thinker or simply a shrewd, Machiavellian politician, but the fact that he framed each of these ideals as a human right, should be troubling to every freedom-loving person in America.

After all, what does it mean for something to be a human right?

Doesn’t it mean that it’s something to which you are entitled simply by virtue of your being human?

Let’s think about some of the basic rights that the real Bill of Rights delineates: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to petition the government, freedom to bear arms, freedom from illegal search and seizure, etc.

And now, if you the liberal progressive, are even moderately intelligent and intellectually honest, you’ll quickly see what separates the rights laid out in the real Bill of Rights from those laid out in FDR’s misguided list – because none of the rights listed above requires the time, treasure, or talents of another human being.

Your right to speak requires nothing from anyone else.

Your right to practice your religion requires nothing from any of your fellow citizens.

Your right to bear arms means that you are allowed to possess weapons to defend yourself and your family, but it makes no demand that a weapon be provided to you by anyone.

A true human right is one that you possess, even if you’re the only person on the entire planet – and it is unconditional.

FDR’s list is no “Bill of Rights.” It’s a list of demands. If I have a right to a job, doesn’t that mean that one must be provided to me? If I have a right to adequate food, clothing, and recreation, doesn’t that mean that I am entitled to those things, and someone should provide them to me? If I have an inherent right to a decent home, once again, doesn’t that mean it should be provided to me, regardless of my ability to afford one or build one for myself?

You might protest that FDR only meant that we have the right to pursue those things, but that’s not what he said, and why would he? If we live in a free society, our right to pursue those things is self-evident. Is it not?

Besides, if he only believed in our right to pursue those things, he would not have felt the need to implement the New Deal.

You may be getting anxious, now, wondering what FDR’s Second Bill of Rights has to do with my antipathy towards the liberal leftist political philosophy. It’s quite simple. The leftist political beliefs are a threat to liberty – not just for me, but for my children and their children as well. I care much less about the America that I’m living in at this very moment than I do about the one that I’m going to be leaving to the ones to come after me…

So now you can see how your political bent threatens mine and my children’s personal liberty. And maybe now is the time that you are in need to classify things such as clothing, shelter, health care, employment, and basic income as basic human rights, and then ask yourself, if you are placing a demand upon my time, my treasure, and my talents.

And if you believe that you have a right to health care, and you are successful in persuading enough shallow thinkers to think as you do, then it will place a demand upon me to provide it to you. And if you believe that you have a right to a job, and more than half of America agrees with you, as a business owner, I am obligated to provide one to you, even if it means making my business less profitable, or even turning it into a collective dud, a cooperative, a socialist kolkhoz, or something even more sinister like an agricultural combine, a soviet gulag, a communist store full of empty shelves, or a mafia family racket…

The fact is, you can rail against Conservatism all you wish, and You can make fun of the conservative Tea Party gatherings, and of the Republicans, and of the Lincoln party, and you can even ridicule patriots in tri-corner hats, until you wet yourself from mirth and uncontrollable laughter, but one thing is for certain: my political philosophy will NEVER be a threat to your freedom.

And if you feel a burning desire to help people, and if you find the inner swell of a righteous responsibility towards the poorest amongst us — conservative people, will never prevent you from working 80 hours per week, and donating all of your income to charity. Indeed Mother Teresa was a staunch Conservative person, and look how much she was able to achieve in alleviating the pain of poverty and famine for so many other people and especially homeless children of India.

And if you today feel a strong sense of pity for a family who cannot afford health insurance, my political philosophy will never prevent you from purchasing health insurance for this family, or raising money to do so, if you cannot afford it, personally.

And if you are moved with compassion for a family who is homeless, a conservative will never use the police power of government to prevent you from taking that family into your own home or mobilizing your community to build one for them.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.20.57 AM

However, you cannot say the same for liberalism.

Because if I choose not to give to the poor for whatever reason, the liberal you, won’t simply try to persuade me on the merits of the idea – you will seek to use the government as an instrument of plunder to force me to give to the poor.

And because if we are walking down the street together, and we spot a homeless person, using this logic, the liberal you, would not simply be content with giving him $20 from your own pocket, but you would hold a gun to my head and force me to give him $20, as well.

In short, everything that modern liberalism accomplishes is accomplished at the barrel of a government rifle, because they do not trust in the generosity of the American people to provide, through private charity, things such as clothing, food, shelter, and health care — so you empower the government to take from them and spend the money on wasteful, inefficient, and inadequate government entitlement programs.

And because Progressive Liberals do not trust in the personal responsibility of the average American to wield firearms in defense of themselves and their families — progressives seek to empower the government to criminalize the possession, and use, of firearms by private citizens. And they always couch that in terms of safety for the children, many of which have been impacted in school shootings that were carried out by disturbed individuals and terrorists. And we all sympathize with that, but the ‘Right To Bear Arms” is enshrined in the Constitution as the 2nd Amendment that protects us from Authoritarian government. And who knows if back in the 1930’s in Europe, we had citizens, self organizing in German Militias, who were well armed and well regulated – maybe, just maybe — the Freedom loving German Citizens could have resisted, pushed back, fought and would have overthrown the terrible Fuhrer, Adolph fvckin Hitler, after he made his “Beer Hall Putsch” and then his main “Putsch” with the burning of the Reichstag, the repulsion of Democracy, the revocation of laws, and the introduction of a totalitarian government. I believe that if that was the case – the crazy Fuhrer would have been stopped from his terrible deeds, and perhaps we could have averted the bloodshed he brought to the World. A bloody mayhem, that at the end of the Second World War and the few years it lasted, saw altogether fifty million soul dead, and in all it’s after-effects an astonishing almost One Hundred Million people were displaced, destroyed, killed, burned, poisoned, maimed, injured, and disappeared – in the European killing fields and in many geographies and countries all over the world. It was indeed a pestilence that was unprecedented in History.

Imagine that we brought this upon ourselves because we weren’t listening to the sane voices of Monsieur Montaigne, nor of Winston Churchill, who had both advised us in their differing ways of the means that we needed to employ in order to prevent this giant bloodletting — from happening. Instead we just thought that it was inevitable and thus we allowed ourselves to slide into it….

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.50.51 AM

So maybe we could have saved One Hundred Million people who were killed and who suffered through the freakin Fuhrer’s wars of Conquest and Egotistical mass murder, but we were complicit in all of it. We are just as responsible because we sought the Treaty of Versailles to be as onerous as it was, and we created the discord and the hate that allowed this wound to fester for so long in the hear of the German people who sought some measure of redress.

We surely and squarely, brought the Second World War upon our lofty idealized heads. And it just happened when we were not watching…

And let’s not forget the additional chaos that was created as the war progressed and caused further death and catastrophes, through the direct and indirect, as well as through the intended and unintended consequences, that were built into the greatest conflict the World has ever known. To this day… yet.

And sadly come to think about it — deprived of weapons and without guns and munitions, the German patriots could not stop Hitler and his NAZI thugs from stealing power. Nor could they prevent the “Putch” and thus we had to suffer this amazing toll of death, as the Global Commons, and the human family, got roiled in blood all over the world.

Now, imagine for a second what the outcome might have been; if we had armed the German patriots and if we had offered our help in killing Hitler, and thus stopping the madness and the insanity from engulfing all of us in this terrible conflagration we have come to know as the World War Two. Of course we all know that the German people were not allowed to have guns in Germany at that time, and thus the patriots were defenseless. So Hitler came up like a thug and through the use of his armed minions took away everybody’s freedom — wholly unopposed.

Same story could play in America today. Because that is the same risk we take if we disallow gun ownership and we start controlling guns amongst society, and if we choose to take them away from the ordinary people. Corruption and Fascism will ensue in short order. Because without guns — we have no defense against Totalitarian governments whatsoever.

And we have to keep being the staunch Guardians of this Constitutional 2nd Amendment because if we stop being vigilant for even a moment – next thing you know we shall have to give up our guns to an untrustworthy government. And once the guns are gone — that means forever. Forever is a long time, and it’s inevitable that totalitarian government will arise at some point – much like in Germany did, and still does, with the regularity of a cuckoo clock.

Pray tell — how are we going to defend our Liberty and our Freedom, or even our Constitution then?

So we can’t give up our guns anymore than we can give up on any point of our Liberty. Because if we even deign to start going down that path — there is no coming back from that slippery slope.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.26.24 AM

And even if we are forced to give up even a little bit out of our 2nd amendment rights to the government — we all know that every time you empower the government, you lose more and more personal liberty, because that is an axiomatic and self evident truth. And in the end we will be left bereft of any Liberty and without guns it will be really difficult to regain even a tiny morsel of it. And that is the Truth, and the reason why we should never ever want to give up our Gun Rights. Patriots have to have arms to defend our Liberty, our Freedom and our Democratic Republic. End of story.

And if you don’t believe me – just ask the Founders of this country, and the Framers of the United States Constitution. Ask people like Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and even George Washington, and they will explain to You the backstory…

Yet what concerns me the most about the Liberal Agenda today, is the eagerness with which Progressives allow the incremental enslavement of society and the citizens — to occur. Because today’s liberal progressives are the “cliché” of the irrational philosophy about the so called “Inevitability of History.” And this shows how their bankrupt socialist philosophy of Big Government, and a “Nanny state” that supposedly “takes care of” people actually takes away all our Liberties.

In the mind of intelligent people this continuous “inevitable” erosion of Liberty – reminds me of the proverbial “frog in the pot” who had actually convinced himself that he discovered a big, silver Jacuzzi, to leisurely relax inside and have a nice hot bath.

Somehow, much like the French frog soon to be on the dinner plate, in a nice romantic Parisian bistro – liberal progressives are naive enough to believe that one more degree of heat, won’t really matter that much to their hot-bath enjoyment.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.47.57 AM

As for me — I have the utmost respect for a slave who is continuously seeking a path to freedom, but I also know that I need to help him liberate himself same as Abraham Lincoln did through his Emancipation proclamation, and same as the Lincoln Party does today. All that we do is to work in order to liberate all the slaves around the world and eradicate the scourge of slavery today from the face of this Earth, because in many Muslim countries today Human Slavery sanctioned by the Koran is practiced openly and unashamedly.

Just imagine that…

And I am not just talking about the female slavery, but about the slavery that is old fashioned bondage of the terrible days of the American South and the Democratic party that worked hard to maintain that horribly abhorrent institution, and caused the break apart of the Union. That is the kind of horrible slavery that we are fighting against all around the world today.
Yes, we aim to emancipate all these people and we will do that swiftly.

In today’s wicked world of the various caliphates and of the lax morals of the Islamic countries or of those places where the Militant Islamists have seized power — we also see far too many sex slaves as young girls who are married against any sense of decency at the ages of seven, or eight years of age, to old men. This travesty is not only acceptable in the Islamic faith, but it is also commonplace. Well — we aim to stop that aberrant behavior, both in America and abroad, same as we aim to stop trafficking of women and children, and rescue all the slave victims of pedophilia, that has become so prevalent around the world, and even in America amongst the establishment class of political perverts today like the Mayor of Seattle Ed Murray, is accused today.

We should not forget also the fact that we need to work against Mental Slavery here in the United States, and abroad where people are infused with the bonds of false belief that causes them to be servants to the Evil Powers that control them for ever. The Democratic party in the United States is still practicing this type of plantation politics today against all the minorities of America.
The Lincoln Party today stands empowered to cut off the bonds of Slavery wherever they may be found.
Yet in doing all that against slavery — what I cannot stomach is a free man who is continuous seeking a path to servitude, by willing to trade his freedom for the false sense of security that government provides.

Screen Shot 2017-05-18 at 9.20.10 AM

I am reminded of Samuel Adams’ impassioned speech where he stated:
“If ye love wealth (or security) better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”

Or Benjamin Franklin’s words: “Those that seek security and safety over freedom – shall have neither.”

And that is exactly why today’s Lincoln Party seeks to free people from mental slavery as well, because servitude can exist in a free society, but freedom cannot exist in a Slave nation, or in a Slave mind.

In a free country, you have the liberty to join with others of your political ilk and realize whatever collectivist ideals you can dream up.

Indeed you can realize your dreams no matter how small or how large these dreams might be. Yes, you too can start your own little commune where the sign at the front gate says, “From each according to his ability; to each according to his need”, and everyone can work for the mutual benefit of everyone else. In my society, you have the freedom to do that.

But in your ideal of a Liberal society, I don’t have the same freedom. If your collectivism offends me, I am not free to start my own free society within its borders. In order for collectivism to work, everyone must be on board, even those who oppose it – why do you think there was a Berlin Wall?

In conclusion, You must know that the harder you push to enact your agenda, the more hostile I will become and the harder I will fight you.

After all, we both know that the road to perdition is lined with good wishes…

Indeed it is nothing personal, but mark my words: If you want to become a slave to an all-powerful central government, be my guest.

But if you are planning to take me, my family, and my people, down with you – I shall raise my musket, aim high, and make a hole in your chest.


Winston Churchill wholeheartedly agrees and concurs with his machine gun at the ready.


A badass “thug” for Liberty and Democracy…

A Great Warrior like his grandson — yours truly. A true fighter always mindful of the True Goal of the fight we are in for.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.52.29 AM

This is a suave policy that he used in order to protect our Freedoms and our prized Liberty…

To be continued…

Posted by: Dr Pano Kroko Churchill | May 18, 2017

What Would Churchill Do? (Chapter 9)

I used to think that the fierce divisions and discord amongst the political parties today – reminds me of the time before the Civil War when Abraham Lincoln was elected to lead the “Divided States” instead of the United States of America, because his term started 10 days into the Civil War that ravaged this country and torn people, families, and communities, asunder — but I was wrong…

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 11.20.20 PM

And Yes — our divisions today, remind me of that sad moment in History when the world was turned upside down, and resulted in the greatest hemorrhage the United States has ever known, but there are other parallels with another resonant time in our history.

Because Abraham Lincoln was a staunch supporter of Conservative values but was also a centrist – we not only had a successful Presidency that won the Civil war, but we also had the Emancipation proclamation that led to the fulfilment of the Constitutional promise and basic equalitarian principle of ‘All Men Are Created Equal’ and the Freedom and Liberty built into that for all the Citizens of this great country. Lincoln sought to unify the unbridgeable gap between the slave holders, the slave liberators, and those recently freed slaves, and he succeeded. That is why History calls him first “The Great Unifier” and secondly “The Great Emancipator.”

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 11.43.38 PM

Similar to Donald Trump today, it is important to remember that the Lincoln Presidency started really badly, but ended swimmingly well — for the American people even if not so for the President himself…

This unassuming geeky and peculiarly tall person got to become the best President this country has ever seen b y dint of applying himself towards the solutions regardless of costs involved, or personal and national sacrifice.

Yet he came to power with far fewer electors than President Trump amassed. Lincoln also got a far smaller percentage of the vote than Trump. Indeed Abraham Lincoln won far fewer electoral districts and counties compared to Donald Trump today. And same as today Lincoln came to be the President of a Divided States of America — except that in his case the division and secession had already occurred and were not a simple theoretical hypothesis, as is the case with today’s America. Because by all accounts President Trump has a far stronger hand at the Presidency than Abraham Lincoln ever had…

And yet amongst all of his difficulties Lincoln succeeded in everything he set out his mind to do. Many years later he also served as an inspiration and a solemn idol for the young Winston Churchill, especially as he was coming down from his Mother’s pantheon of American heroes. Indeed, it was Abraham Lincoln who first informed Winston of the wrongheadedness of the Apartheid system of governance of South Africa and it was also Abraham Lincoln who “armed” Churchill’s speeches with virulent Republican and Conservative strong arguments to bolster his own anti-apartheid principles —  that were to be used every time Churchill had to fight the idiocy of that institution prevalent in South Africa.

Well done Winnie — well done.

Bucking the tides and going against the grain, is one aspect of Life that joins us fully together.

And we are both survivors… too.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 12.11.25 AM

Yours truly after having suffered the horrific attack during my political speech inside Microsoft Corporation headquarters, that has left me with a swollen brain and hematoma on the left temple of the cranium, and a half paralyzed head and weakened left side of the body. Fitting one would say because of today’s intolerant liberal Left that hates anyone who has different ideas and uses naked violence to silence the opposing voices — my left side has been weakened and I need Brain surgery for alleviating the brain swelling…

Indeed today in America, there are strong similarities with the times just before the Anglo-American war of 1812, that ended without any significant territorial changes, but declaimed the illusions of both sides, and certainly removed the last vestiges of Indian sovereignty from the Strategic negotiating table in the American continent, thus allowing for the rapid Western expansion of the United States.

Maybe because back then, we were all too focused on the Napoleonic war’s Eastern front, and the French Grand Army’s massing around Moscow, hoping to seize the Kremlin; and we were forgetting the pesky Canadians, and even Tecumseh, the savvy warrior who was the Native American leader, fighting brilliantly alongside the British armies and navy, in order to gain territorial advantage and recognition for all the native tribes and for Canada.

Yet it was the British Navy that started the whole trouble because every time they encountered American ships, they sought to “impress” American sailors to their own British warships, in order to have adequate manpower with “fresh” sailors, to fight their existential war in Europe, and in the seven seas, against Napoleon Bonaparte who was marauding all over Europe, and North Africa and who at the time was advancing in all the territories around Moscow.

Russia all over again and it was an Ally back then too… What gives?

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.58.27 AM

This is playing out the same way as today, when we are forgetting to look at the reality of our situation, and instead we are occupied with falsities emanating from those propagandists that seek to divide us by masking the real troubles brewing in our own backyard. This is today – yet back in the day – we were woken up by a harsh dose of reality bitter medicine.

And maybe now in 2017, we are just as ignorant of World Affairs as we were back in 1806 – 1807, and moving ahead inexorably to the heart of the conflict, towards 1812, when Napoleon Bonaparte’s armies were massing outside of Moscow, and the Americans were chasing Indians and the few Canadian homesteaders around the great lakes and in Niagara on the Canadian border, while avoiding battling the British regiments of redcoats, stationed near there.

But sooner rather than later War found us and it was so catastrophic that we choose to forget it today. Indeed it was in that war that Washington DC got burned to the ground along with the White House, and eventually we had to sue for Peace luckily through our skilful President Madison’s masterful use of Diplomacy, and through the US naval victories in the Great Lakes — we accomplished that feat and we were left with our honor intact and our borders unchanged.

In the war of 1812, we were saved through the fight the Patriots brought to the British, and through the many offices of Deliverance stemming from Providence, that once again, we were able to pursue our Western expansion unchecked.

Yes, the times and days, that we live now, reflect both the Victories and our Defeats alike — because it is the completion of our failing efforts to reform our Economy, and to do that we need to change the reflection of the world we choose to see. Indeed like those living in Plato’s cave paradox — our world view is that which needs to be improved.

And that is what keeps me up at night. Am thinking of where we have gone wrong, and what would Lincoln or even Winston Churchill would do to fix this bloody awful mess of division and wake us all up?

It is sadly the worst of times. And if we also want it to be the best of times too — we have much work to do, in order to overcome our self induced handicap, mainly because we haven’t yet been able to clearly see the incoming clouds of the Dark Ages. This is what we need to see, because these clouds of mental fugue, cultural tiredness, as well as exhaustion brought on by war and destruction — are all descending upon us once again. And because while two significant trend lines in the world today pull us into the conflicts of perceived World Supremacy – the reality is that our true enemy is the faulty cult of this most virulent religion, and the militant ideology, of Islam, and that hateful form of Chinese Communism. These mental viruses attacking our Society’s collective brian, coupled with the illness of creeping Socialism this other virus attacking the brains of human beings, is what we need to eradicate immediately.

Still, ordinary political leaders and policy makers — can only see and understand the visible threats like the big incoming and recurring asteroids like the Haley’s comet, that will surely not hit the Earth. And thus they miss out on seeing all the other unusual space rocks that are raining down on this Earth, can cause an extinction event like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs. Sadly such is the extent of our leaders’ interest and their understanding. And today, the increasing ambition and activism of the two great revisionist powers, Russia and China, masks the fact that both have recently and decisively changed the maps of the World, through their recent territorial ‘acquisitions’ and energetic outward facing movements. Add to that the painful reality that the all important and major threat of the Islamic Cult’s global spread, and of the export of their virulent militant & terrorist faith, and that quickly becomes the most important threat we are facing today. Still this trifecta of ‘imminent dangers’ goes completely unchecked…

Yet in my mind that is the real threat facing our Republic: The combined effect of all these threats and the ‘thousand cuts’ that are delivered daily against our Nation, by our own misguided liberal and corrupt public employees, elected officials, and even members of the Security & Intelligence services and even our Military. These folks along with the likes of the ever more popular Socialists are causing further decline in the confidence of the Western Civilization in it’s own powers, traditions, and righteousness. Sanctuary cities, screaming demonstrating socialists, radicals and liberals trashing our constitution, and the general lawlessness they create — allows the ‘safe space’ for Radical Islam and Liberal Fascism to take over. And perhaps more tellingly; it is the loss of “Testosterone” of the people of these United States, that is the rightful heir to the Anglo-Saxon tradition; that causes today’s scepter holder of the Empire of Good for our World to fail. And it is in this special capacity of the United States, that the danger comes from the loss of strength, willfulness, and self belief, on behalf of the leader of the democratic world, that worries me — because if we fail to maintain the dominant position we have held in the international system since 1945, we are destined to be wiped out from the face of this Earth.


Yet as the threats and the forces that create them; move against us, and they come closer and closer, every day amidst the declining capacity of the United States and its allies to maintain the present world order — this raises the stakes of the US’s existential game.
Because the threat coming from the increasing desire and capacity of the militant Islamic virulent brain software, coupled with the revisionist powers that all want to cause us to collapse — we falter. And that is the kiss of death because if we falter, we will soon reach the moment at which the existing World order will collapse, and the world will descend into a phase of brutal anarchy, and bloodshed, as it has done more than a FEW times in the past century alone. And that is not the worst that can happen. Things could spiral out of control and get to be even worse than that with a complete collapse of our own.


And here is what is even worse: The coming conflict could devolve into a complete annihilation of our forces in nuclear wars, with the new nuclear belligerent state and non state actors acting on faith and ideology – that will devolve to an Islamic takeover of the remaining survivors living under the long & dark nuclear winter. That will in turn lead to a swift replay of the dark ages, all over again. And that’s exactly what the apocalyptic Militant Islam is aspiring to bring on with the worldwide Jihad. So now it’s up to the libtards and their all encompassing treasonous attitudes towards the misguided mullahs and towards the religious adherents of the virulent and rabid brain software of the militant Islamic faith…

Yet today, is maybe too late to reverse the losses the past four terrible Presidents chalked up on us – but it’s not too soon to know what effect Donald Trump’s muscular Presidency will have on these trends. Of course under Trump, we will upend many apple carts, but we have no certainty whatsoever, because the early signs suggest that the new administration under Trump is more likely to hasten us toward uncertainty and crisis, rather than towards the slow yet steady reversal of these downward trends in a plodding and realism building deeply involved in infrastructure rebuilding administration.

And yet that’s exactly what we need.

That and all the other things. With the need to cause great unease and uncertainty to our enemies, being the paramount one. And the need to overwhelm them being the second most important one, because when we choose to attack them we absolutely need to win the war fast. Even in matters of perception, and in those hypothetical fights of the mind, and the flights of the intellect – war is still the father of us all.

“War is the Father of us all. King of all. Some it makes Gods, some it makes Men. Some it makes Slaves, some it makes Free.”

War defines us and we have managed to avoid that for such a long stretch that it now beckons us. Let’s take for example the accommodation shown to Russia in an apparent dismissal of China’s second world power role. Of course on the face of it, as analysts assume, this action, can only embolden Russian ambitions in Eastern Europe, on the Arctic, and around the Caucasus region, while at the same time enraging China to do something extraordinarily stupid and militant.
Nothing could be further from the Truth…
Because however tough the talk with China and her ‘puppet’ North Korea might be — the reality is that it will likely lead Beijing via Puyonyang, to test the new administration’s resolve militarily, and thus provoke an unrestrained American response, unleashed in order to check their expansionary geopolitical ambitions.
A nuclear Pearl Harbor event, will follow this policy, with predictable and devastating results. And it is obviously good to have this bitter pill go down today that American marginally maintains its Supremacy – rather than rely on appeasement, and thus stave off the inevitable confrontation and await quietly the days of ‘Hun hegemony’ all over the Pacific world.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 9.56.49 AM

This would not serve Western Civilization’s interests, and the US, and UK must not stand for that. Now we must engage in this urgent project in order to defuse the situation for the exact same reason.

The US & the UK must join forces all over again, in order to Save the World, and the Western Civilization at the same time.

Nothing Less than that will do…

Now whether the United States, the US President, and the generals of the Armed Forces of America, and their counterparts in the UK are cognizant of this existential threat, and are ready for such monumental undertaking, or are gearing up for the looming confrontation — this is entirely unclear.

For the moment, the New President Trump, makes all the correct noises and commences correct and evasive actions – and although he appears not to have thought much about the deep & far reaching ramifications of this Clash of Civilizations — it is clear that he understands the Great Game of human competition and besting your opponent; better than anyone else in Office ahead of him. And even though his rhetoric and his actions, along with his natural Bravado, and his ‘Big Talk’ might demonstrate otherwise — I am confident that he knows exactly what we are talking about here, and what is needed to happen to absorb the body blows while we start building our defenses, and prepare to play our offensive and winning game.

One must know that Trump is a player, and as such he plays to win. Sure he also dishes his enemies, and thus he owns them. He ‘negs’ them, but this is his small exercise because he plays to win far bigger things. He plays to win for America. And he does this “Playing” the game of ‘Go’ perfectly with China. Because he plays masterfully, and he trashes them, and it is China now that like a good obedient and low self esteem ‘female’ — comes back begging for more ‘negging.’ He goes on about it in America too, and he seems to be heaping abuse towards certain militant and violent minorities… but in reality he is working the game of reverse psychology, and the people understand and love him for it. And by the way, they also go out of their way to vote for him, and then keep coming back for more. Similarly, he trashes the Libs, and the Dems, and when they start working overtime to generate publicity for him — he trashes them some more, and they work harder, and he trashes them even harder; until he finally he has had enough, and dismisses them to a dark corner of the room wearing a white cape and a white ‘dunce cap’ to lick their wounds.

Trump is a classic Gladiator. He is a professional Competitor. He feigns left and right of the political spectrum. He is utterly flexible. He never telegraphs his moves to his opponents. He uses subterfuge. And he ‘plays’ all of them… At the end of the day — he is a player. As a matter of fact he is a Great yet Classical Player. He has technical mastery of the Game of Life. He even utilizes ‘negging,’ dismissal, and abandonment; he doesn’t fear adversity, and he cares little about the opinion of others, as he uses reverse psychology on all adversaries in order to get what he wants. That’s how he owned crooked Hillary and the Democratic party machine and he turned them into unwitting ‘slaves’ who forgot any message they might have had, and instead focused on blowing his ‘trumpet’ constantly attacking, referring, and simply talking about him in all the Media. Now Trump knows that all publicity is good publicity — especially if you know how to manage it, and if you can neg your ‘female’ opponent to do your laundry for you, cook your breakfast, and even shine your loafers while she is constantly in a perpetual state of passive aggressive meltdown.

Trump as a player is a Rock. He lets all kinds of hate and malice wash over him and not affect him. He focuses on where the ball is going to be and not where the other players hope to make a ‘play.’ He plays forward always on the attack and he knows all the tricks. These and all those other valuable techniques he utilizes, in order to get the best advantage for America, and in order to get what’s good for the American people, by stealing the ‘Game’ away from the insecure, the vulnerable, and the fragile people, who happen to be the leaders of various inimical nations, or simply enemy leaders all around, and even misguided friends.

Screen Shot 2017-05-17 at 11.44.18 PM

In a very Churchillian fashion Donald Trump has proven that he knows ‘How to Snatch Victory From the Jaws of Defeat.’

Trump is a strong Churchillian conservative, because that is exactly what he did when the whole world was sound asleep. He snatched the CHALICE OF OF VICTORY — fully assured of his worth and the response of the American people to his positive message of CHANGE.

Trump snatched the Victory cup from the grasping claws of that corrupt and crooked establishment that wanted Hillary at the helm of the nation, in order to further their thieving agenda. That is how they tried to convince the World that Hillary and her sidekick the Muslim militant feminist Huma wife of dick-pic Weiner — were going to be the winner. Of course, the pundits, the politicos, the corrupt establishment players, the DC beltway swamp dwellers, and the global Mass Media, were all reassuring us — that crooked Hillary will be the next President of the United States, regardless of any electoral upsets. And of course CNN watching stupid folks had believed that and had already started boozing to celebrate her victory. Special cocktails were being composted in the ‘Hillary2016 — I’m with her’ election signs decorated bars of Williamsburg in Brooklyn all the way to Manhattan and Hollywood; in honor of the first totally boozer blotto yet female candidate to become President. Well, say ‘mazeltov’ to that nonsense, and let’s raise a CHEER to Donald Trump who doesn’t drink a drop because he knows how alcohol creates Losers and not Winners — at least amongst those who are weak enough and do not know how to handle it. Even Winston always said that he treated his ‘drink’ as a ‘spice’ to Life and not as the main course… as himself always had a hearty meal with family and friends, and always carried healthy cerebral conversations to be accompanied along with the social lubricant — his drink of choice — Champagne. All the rest about his ever-ready glass of whiskey and cigars was more myth than man because he wanted to support and project a certain image for the people of Britain and the World.

And now Trump the teetotaler has scrubbed the ‘minds’ of the political establishment and the press ‘clean’ of their illusions and of any hope that they can bring back their days of relevance. He made all of them redundant as he pulled the largest upset of the century — when he unseated their alcoholic passive aggressive always blotto candidate. He crashed every Democrat’s morale, and he drove Hillary and all her staff to destruction. They all started hitting the ‘bottle’ even harder than before. Hell — these dummies not only went for the alcohol bottle with a vengeance, but they fired up the weed bong, they vaped, lit the roach, did the doobie, smoked the crack, ate the pain-killers, the vicodin and the other opiates, ingested heroin and the opioids, and then took Valiums to go to sleep. And sleep they will do until the Trump Presidency is over.
Maybe in 4, or maybe in 8 years they will wake up again. You see they reasoned that they will sleep like Rip Van Winkle, and they will come up again, and rise from their hibernation — when Hillary will be magically installed as the President of the United States.
And in that lucid state of drug induced fog — they must have an explanation of how this will come about. Maybe the Russians, or maybe the Huma Abedin and Anthony ‘Dick’ Weiner will get her through the door, or maybe Hillary will get in the White House through some Alien intervention from UFOs or from Saudi Arabia’s Muslim installed government for Sharia law, social justice, and gay feminism in these United States. Indeed all of them are ‘pipe’ dreams but that ‘s what you get when you use all that ‘shite’ we mentioned above mixed in a nice cocktail, while your name isn’t Keith Richard.

So do you think it was difficult for Donald Trump — a seriously thinking teetotaller — to defeat these snowflakes?

He did it, and he’ll do it again in 2020.

And he will cure a lot of the ills troubling America, as he attacks all the current problems, not necessarily in any particular order, because he doesn’t want to offer his enemies a possibility for entrenchment to wage a pitched battle. He is all over the battlefield, and he attacks like a guerilla fighter, here and there and everywhere. That is how he eliminated his opposition during the campaign, and he ruthlessly continues to do so as he throws body blows to their midsection causing them to internally hemorrhage. He harvests the ‘blood’ and he recycles it to build up the Republican party and a Unified America for the long term and he is mindful of winning the next term too, but most importantly carrying the White House in Conservative and creating a Legacy for the future.

And the thing is that he owns the future, because the American people have decided to assign the previous moronic leaders to the trash heap of History for good…

Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 6.40.01 PM

Trump is way smarter than people give him credit for.

Trust me, he is not a dummy.

The legion of competitors he bested, and the pretty women that he “owned” and he still “owns” today, speaks volumes for the man. And the proof of his ‘genius’ is in the pudding. From the way he “owned” crooked Hillary, and the whole of the corrupt and yet all powerful Democratic and Republican establishment parties, attests to that fact.

So say what you will about The Donald, and his methods, but know that his motives are good. His aim is true. His faith is correct and the value of his judgment is priceless. His hand is unwavering, and his intellect unpolluted. He is free of addiction, unlike the three last Presidents, and indeed he likes to play the hick-boy, the red neck, and the rough builder, and he uses the talk and the manner of a simple tradesman, in order to mesh with the ‘salt of the earth’ people, because it is natural for him to be the rough and tumble construction businessman, since that is what he ultimately is. And that is why so many ordinary American people ‘Love’ him, and that is why his public perceives him as a doer, a decider, and a winner, and certainly not as a bullshitter like people perceive the Democrats. And that is why President Trump is now the President, and not that silly crooked Hillary, and her evil entourage; made up of people that lied, schemed, bullied, stole votes, rigged the elections, and even killed people, on their way to stealing a rigged election — and thus ended up burning down the house of the Democratic party completely.

Well done Dems. Let’s do that again next year’s election season…

Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 3.50.11 PM

In contrast to that, President Trump is truly the builder of America’s Tomorrows. He gets the fact that people want jobs to earn a living as proud Americans. He gets the need to protect our borders. He gets the desire of a Christian people to be protected from the cult of Islam and it’s virulent and militant ideology of hate. He recognizes the need for a strong party and that is why he reshaped the Republican party completely, and he regained total control of the United States government in all three branches. He acts upon the will of the American people and nothing more. President Donald Trump is the Doer, the Decider, and the Winner for America. And he is a Strong Captain of Industry and Business, and thus he understands that Business is the Business of America. And in another Churchillian twist, he is also a good manager and organizer of people. He grogs the needs of Executive power and that is why we learn from his handling of previous works that were ‘stuck’ like the ice-rink in Central Park and so many other projects that he rescued from mothballs — that he will manage the American machine of state well and he will turn it up to start firing again on all cylinders.

He is a good Leader in his exercise of the Art of Power and very much like Churchill, he commands attention to the important detail of the Art of leadership. And indeed like Winston Churchill spoke a long time ago — today Donald Trump wants to Make America Great Again, and that is good enough for me, because unfortunately we’ve fallen down and we need some help, to be able to stand up again.

Yes, our Future is uncertain, and yes our chances are diminished after 40 years of weakness and been bled dry, through the awful services of this series of the four worst Presidents anyone can come up with … and who like the four worst Roman emperors, unwittingly sought to put an end to the Empire, through their sheer incompetence, small mindedness, and plain old stupidity. Rome fell when three terrible Leaders came to be in successive order — so let’s consider ourselves lucky. Fortunate would be a better word, because luck had very little to do with it — but divine intervention perhaps had a lot more to do with us, because American people are prayerful and God listens to those he hears from frequently and whose prayers and meditations are offered up reverentially, and accompanied by good deeds and personal sacrifice…

And with God’s help there is nothing we cannot achieve. Because certainly our chances are sketchy, and our alliances shaky, but our faith is strong — and we like to play these games of risk, since we believe that we have adequate skills to compensate. And with a Good Captain at the helm, we like sailing in inclement weather, so that we just might ride out the storm away from shore and out of our safe harbors, sailing the seven seas, in our ships of war, far out at sea, away from shore and port — because when the great tsunami hits, and when the storms are set to make landfall, it’s best to be way out in deep waters — certainly far from shore.


And we have to do that, somewhat like ‘New Athenians’ taking our ‘Men-Of-War’ out to sea with our best fighting men, the Marines armed and ready in our ships that will go build a ‘wall’ like the Delphic Oracle advised… so many years before. And that is the same Oracle that Winston Churchill heard when he focused on building the greatest Naval Fleet the world had ever known. And maybe that is the Churchillian Oracle that Donald Trump hears in his American Spirit, when he sends out the Navy to sort the North Korean nuclear threats. And also as he will surely send the fleet to pacify the Iranian nuclear threat as well. Because with a strong Navy we get the job done. After all that’s how we fought the Barbarians in the past, that’s how we pacified the Barbary coast of the Mediterranean and certainly, that’s how we will fight them and pacify them again today and in the future. That is how Themistocles won the battle of Salamis against the Persians and Winston Churchill won the Second World War.

An all powerful Navy that ruled the seven seas and put our enemies out of business. To put them out of business, literally and figuratively, is the goal today — same as it was back in early 1800s, when the U.S. President Thomas Jefferson bid his Navy to attack the Tripolis and Benghazi caliphates and the US Marines destroyed these horrid barbaric Muslim powers. They flattened them and reduced them to vassal states that were too weak and prevented from ever being a power again in the Barbary coast of their own Libyan coast, or being a threat against commercial shipping in the Mediterranean sea, ever again.

Unfortunately in more recent times, crooked Hillary, as Secretary of State weak at the knees and of no backbone or courage — allowed the American Ambassador to be hunted down as a dog and to be killed, unaided by anyone. She assigned this valiant man to be executed in cold blood without even trying to send in some help, from even one of the many units that could have saved the Life of the Ambassador and his security detail. Not one of the many fast strike forces available in the area or nearby, were deployed because Hillary was afraid to act lest she offends her Muslim handlers, the Saudi Arabians. The nasty Islamic Militants that bankrolled her campaign illegally with upwards of Five billion US Dollars….

Now that is some Electoral Campaign interference worth investigating…

For Shame….

For Bloody Shame.

This Is How Low We Have Fallen.

Of course, now things are changing, but our Navy and our Air Force will both have to be magnified, and carefully rebuilt, and re-equipped, so that we can withstand the incoming wars, and the tests these conflicts will present to our way of Life, and to our Civilization. Because we have to also ‘carry’ our fickle and weak allies in this conflict where nothing less is at stake; than the whole of the Western Civilization.

The veracity of my Oracle on this issue and that axiomatic truth — you can take it to the Bank.

Screen Shot 2017-03-28 at 10.27.06 AM

And it is God’s fortuitous gift that in the worst of times – we are given the best Leader, so that our descent into the rough waters of Hades, is not guaranteed.

Long is the night, but we will not go there quietly.

It is a great conflict we are engaging in now, and indeed we should all be alert to it’s dangers; because the cost of inactivity, is a sure descent into Hades, and staggering loss of lives and treasure, lost freedom, lost hope, and a blow so staggering to the point of complete collapse of our Civilization. And most of that will happen suddenly – yet keep in mind, that our loss of Civilization, will result in the termination of human existence on this planet.

It’s a dismal thought to comprehend, yet this Dystopia is not unavoidable. We have to fight for it. We have to fight for home and hearth, and for what is holly in all of us. Above all else – we have to fight to stop the rot and excise the corruption, because this world that our Western Civilizations is called to lead today, is all we’ve got.


And the fact that I am called to advise on how to avoid this end is historic.

Thus I advocate that we Fight and fight to win, Yet win our victories by using the tools and the means that represent the best and not the worst of Humanity.

Let’s learn to play the great game of King’s named “GO” that our Chinese opponents know how to play well enough, but I am a Master of it… and I’ll help control the most territory globally for the United States.

Let’s use our intelligence for Progress, and for our very own Principled Existence as the bulwark in defense of the Future of the whole of Humanity and the Western Civilization agains the forces of Asiatic darkness and Islamic Barbarism. Because only when we work together and we push hard with all of our forces at full tilt, and we fight our wars based on our deeply held Western principles – we will always win.

And as I write this book, let it be seen as a last hope and as a last stand, in an attempt to wake us up, and stop the rot and protect us from going quietly into the long night, because I invariably shudder at the thought of all that is beautiful all around us — being extinguished forever. And because I hate to see all that we hold dear, being destroyed.

But even that is acceptable if that is the cost of Survival of the Human race…


So lets figure out who are friends truly are and who are our enemies and clan the slate…

And let this book be a clarion call for Human Dignity, for Liberty, and for Democracy, stemming from Human Beings endowed through Free Will with full fledged Human Rights, fighting towards regaining the Light of Day. So let us fight with the remaining Strength left to us for a highly uncertain future, that has got to be reached regardless of cost. Let us fight with Principle and Conviction, but let us fight as knights of old – together in Life and together in Death.

That is the Special Relationship…

A future that is to be won from the clutches of a looming darkness, and through the ruins of the war of civilizations that our time gears up for., and that we are called to fight regardless the State of our Readiness or our Affairs.
This will be a Darwinian War of survival of the fittest: Not the strongest, not the most sensible, not the one with the best weapons – but the most flexible and adaptable one.

That will be the entity that will survive and thrive on top of what will remain upon this Good Earth after our bloodiest conflicts will come to an end not through peace or agreement – but through the vanquished extinction of the losers and the defeated.

That is the next war to face us.

And it is imminent, but in some ways we have been fighting that war already and we are knee deep in blood – albeit we don’t know it yet, because the bloodshed is confined in shut off corners of our world bordered by the flimsy borders of failed states that are home to abject terror and terror alone.

Seems to me that this is evident, as it is to many other important world leaders: When our Freedom is at stake, political sides must come to the table, say their piece, raise the specter of consensus, take a show of hands, and then agree to unite, and follow through in action, with whatever is the agreed upon wisdom of the day, as decided by all.

Liberty requires us to give and take, and in Politics that is exactly what we need to do. Because we all have to do this all the time, so why political battles should be any different? Especially when we already know that when we are unruly and remain divided – we surely shall fall, and then we shall be disciplined by none other than History which is a Woeful Master…

To paraphrase Herodotus, the father of history who said that: “Here are the stories of the Ten Thousand Peoples, Civilizations, Great Kings, Rulers, and Emperors that nobody today remembers their name save for the sands of time…”

And let’s not forget the other old Greek Philosopher Heraclitus that stated unequivocally that: “Nothing is permanent except Change.”

And that is what we have to go through… Change.

Yet we ought to realize that “changing” and living through ‘Change’ are two vastly different things. Continued existence is not guaranteed to any Republic, Nation, or People, as Herodotus would attest if you were to read his Histories of the 10,000 Kings and Nations, that are not with us anymore… and are fully lost and forgotten in the sands of time.

To be continued…

Older Posts »