Posted by: Dr Churchill | June 26, 2018

SpyGate (Chapter Twenty Eight)

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
Chapter Twenty Eight
“Discrimination is the DemoRat game now.”

Chairman Devin Nunes, of the “House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,” appeared on a television broadcast yesterday, in order to outline the latest developments surrounding “Spygate” and to offer all of us, a solemn warning, that the FBI and the Obama era security apparatus had gone all corrupt Gestapo on us.

Because as he said, in addition to all the FISA surveillance abuses, the fraud perpetrated by the FBI upon the FISA court, and the altered 302s (FBI interviews), there is now evidence that the Obama White House, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA, and the FBI, all had planted spies, agents and saboteurs, as embedded secret enemy operatives, inside the Trump campaign, for the purpose of planting evidence, causing entrapment, and sharing general disinformation, thus spreading and furthering the then nascent Russia-Russia hoax, and the looming witch hunt against President Trump — that has now mushroomed into the Robert Mueller travesty of an investigation…

And of course now that the FBI has kept up with this charade for almost three years without any result — they are loath to shut it down, out of embarrassment and their biased enmity and discrimination against the political candidate that was targeted originally, and who now is the President of the United States.

They want to keep it up, hoping against hope that they will find something — anything — against the President, because otherwise, if they shut down the Trump Russia hoax, they will have to take another look at Hillary’s legion of crimes and treasonous behavior. And that irks the FBI brass more than their hemorrhoids of which they have plenty as James Comey can attest. And their blood pressure is surging also because they pine for the good old days of Madame President when Barry the Stoner was indisposed (baked out of his gourd) and Hillary was taking all the decisions of the US government. And the FBI brass is whiplashed from that runaway train crash that came about when the crooked Hillary lost the rigged election.

So now the FBI brass is still imagining that if Secretary Clinton had won, none of that awful BS circulating now on the rotary fan, would have been spread around, and of course none of that shit would have mattered, because it would all have been buried under eight feet of Clinton BS, and Obama’s silver tongue would be wiping her ass daily…

We dodged that bullet — thank God — and we are still alive and kicking in our Democratic Republic, having a measure of Freedom, our Rights, and our Liberty, still today…

Because the rest of us who are not so much into ass-licking, the spectacle of those two destroying our Democracy was so vile and disgusting, that we started a revolution, as a way to remedy the situation, by getting out the vote and by looking at this corruption matter in many different ways, as some people have suggested we do…

Take for example the blatant case of discrimination that the FBI is engaged into, due to Bill Clinton directing AG Loretta Lunch and her in turn directing James Comey, to call this Hillary debacle of her 700,000 hacked emails that all intelligent foreign powers had access to — a simple matter — and not an official FBI investigation.

Now, if the FBI was a corporation or any other agency — they would be found guilty of clear discrimination bias, if the Trump Investigation was a racial discrimination lawsuit, since Hillary and Trump are similarly situated. Yet when it comes to investigating allegations of illegality against them — the FBI approached the two cases in a completely different, biased, and even deferential manner for one of the two candidates.

Hillary was fawned upon, whereas Trump was ruthlessly attacked. Indeed the Donald, was attacked in a beastly fashion, by a freshly unleashed gang of junkyard dogs, of the FBI, that had gone unfed for a month, while chained to a post, inside a dark & dank basement of the torture chambers where they were only allowed to lick fresh human blood, to develop a taste for the jugular…

And then they were unleashed against Trump and his campaign people.

And even after he became the President these fools persisted in harassing him, and the people closest to him…

God surely blinds those he is willing to erase from his earthly kingdom, as he surely wishes to do with the corrupt FBI brass and their Gestapo trained leftist national socialist minions.

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 11.07.24 AM

And that is what makes this case of the blatant discrimination by the FBI, an extremely clear discrimination bias suit, if one were to glean the reality of it, from simply reading the currently released DOJ inspector general Horowitz report about the corruption inside the federal bureau of investigations.

Indeed, all Christian Conservatives stood agape last week at the inspector general’s refusal to state the obvious in his 568-page review of the FBI and Justice Department’s handling of the Clinton probe, since a pro-Hillary political bias in the DOJ, and inside the FBI, led all those high minded officials to let her slide like a slinky, and they actually helped Hillary off the hook, with a Free pass and a slice of cake to go with it…

And while Michael Horowitz’s report highlighted numerous instances of anti-Trump and pro-Hillary bias, in true lawyerly fashion — Horowitz focused the conclusion of his report, on the lack of “documentary or testimonial evidence” showing that political prejudice “directly affected” the decisions made in the investigation.

To any other lawyer or lay person, this phrase would strike a chord of hilarity, because the methods of proving discriminatory intent are well-established, and such direct evidence of animus (or favoritism) is not required to show that an illegal motive drove an employment favoritism decision.

Under the federal statute that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of age, sex, race, national origin, or religion, a plaintiff must prove an employer took an adverse employment action because of the employee’s membership in a protected class. In other words, an employee must prove that because he is African-American, and not Caucasian, the employer denied him a promotion (or didn’t hire him, or fired him). Over the years, the courts have crafted two methods of proving discriminatory intent: the direct method and the indirect method.

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 12.57.57 PM

Under the direct method, a plaintiff must present direct or circumstantial evidence of animus. Direct evidence basically involves an admission that the illegal animus, whether it be race or sex, national origin or religion, motived the employment decision. “I fired Ed because he is too old to coach football,” would be a simple example.

Circumstantial evidence may also establish discriminatory intent but requires an added inference. For instance, circumstantial evidence that racial animus motivated the employer could come in the form of past racist statements or racial slurs, even without the employer tying the employee’s race to the current employment decision. An employer’s past race-based employment decisions would likewise serve as evidence that race motivated the employer’s treatment of this employee.

However, given the ease with which an employer can disguise discriminatory intent, employees can instead prove illegal animus through the indirect method. Under the indirect method, an employee creates an inference of discriminatory intent by showing that the employer treated the plaintiff differently than similarly-situated employees of a different race (or religion, or sex, etc.).

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 11.03.37 AM

Thus, an African-American employee who qualified for a promotion, but was rejected in favor of a Caucasian employee, could establish an inference that the employer discriminated against the plaintiff because of his race.

The employer must then produce evidence of a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the decision, such as that the Caucasian employee’s sales figures consistently exceeded the African-American employee’s, justifying the promotion.

Now let’s apply these well-established principles of employment law to a theoretical investigation into a company’s two sets of employees — Hillary Clinton and her associates, and Donald Trump and his associates, — pretending for purposes of illustration, that team Hillary is Caucasian and team Trump is African-American.

Let’s also assume that the FBI personnel’s texts, SMS, and other recorded comments, were race-based instead of Trump-based.

Here is Lisa Page’s text to Peter Strzok in that context: “That African-American is not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” And her FBI colleague Strzok’s response: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.” That statement, if spoken in the context of an employment decision, would be the rarely existent direct evidence of racial animus.

That the two FBI agents spoke about Trump instead of about a black person — changes nothing of importance. Instead, it provides direct evidence of an illicit motive. That evidence is backed up with the additional circumstantial evidence consisting of anti-Trump and pro-Hillary messages exchanged by Page and Strzok and the other unnamed agents.

Applying the indirect method of proof is equally damning. Hillary and Trump are similarly situated, yet in investigating allegations of illegality, the FBI approached the cases differently. Consider, for instance, the FBI’s approach to questioning witnesses. Following the FBI’s questioning of a tech person who had helped the Clintons at their Chappaqua residence, a text conversation between an FBI employee and an agent included this tidbit:

FBI Employee: ‘boom…how did the [witness] go’
Agent 1: ‘Awesome. Lied his ass off. Went from never inside the scif (sensitive compartmented information facility) at res, to looked in when it was being constructed, to removed the trash twice, to troubleshot the secure fax with HRC a couple times, to everytime there was a secure fax i did it with HRC. Ridic,’

FBI Employee: ‘would be funny if he was the only guy charged in this deal’
Agent 1: ‘I know. For 1001. Even if he said the truth and didnt have a clearance when handling the secure fax – aint noone gonna do shit’
In contrast, when the FBI interviewed Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn, the agents reported that they did not believe Flynn had lied. Yet, the DOJ later charged Flynn with lying to investigators to force him to cooperate and hopefully reveal dirt on his boss. Is there a legitimate explanation for this disparate treatment? No.

Consider, then, how these facts would look to a jury considering a race discrimination case in which an employer decided to investigate two employees suspected of theft. In interviewing witnesses to the events, the employer uses a velvet touch when questioning witnesses possessing information about the Caucasian employee (Hillary in our hypothetical), while applying an iron fist in interrogations of witnesses close to the African-American employee (Trump in our scenario.) It would involve race-based discrimination — just like the comparative handling of the Clinton and Trump investigations involved politically motivated discrimination.

The DOJ inspector general Horowitz, however, is not examining, not hearing, and not trying a discrimination case against anybody. He is not trying any case in a court of law. He is not a judge, and he doesn’t even have subpoena powers, but rather he is a “Monitor” and a “Reporter” of the massive FBI institutional, consistently massive, and discriminatory bias…

But even if Horowitz doesn’t judge, that doesn’t mean that the public cannot judge for themselves…

Screen Shot 2018-06-22 at 8.45.11 AM

We can all judge and can quite easily decide for ourselves, whether discriminatory political bias that was found to be prevalent amongst the agents and amongst the FBI attorneys and that is what  prompted the FBI and the DOJ’s laziness to investigate and then also caused the total inaction of the FBI and the DOJ during the Clinton probe…

And we can all similarly judge and decide if the same discriminatory bias is what also motivated the FBI’s overreaction, eagerness, and jealous disregard for the law in pursuing the Trump campaign probe, and in staffing the campaign of a Presidential Candidate with spies, saboteurs, and surveillance, and even used plenty of subterfuge in cutting him down, as they have done to his campaign manager Paul Manafort, whom they managed to set up and corral into jail…

Talk about Gestapo methods and KGB tactics to get your opponent to heel…

We can now see the blatant discrimination practiced by the FBI and the massive corruption prevalent in the DOJ, and the Obama corruption machine, because we recognize the tell tale signals of the Deep State totalitarian government discriminatory bias, unethical behavior, and criminal overreach.

We’ve seen it all now, and the Obama/Clinton administration better fess up, and own up to it. Enough with the disambiguation and the subterfuge. No amount of distractions like the chicken and the egg story of illegal immigration will ever detract us from the real issue that American patriots face today:

Save the Republic.

That’s the only thing that matters. Now, later and forever…

And if we are to borrow a phrase from another area and era of the law, as in when discussing pornography — we better get started by asking the following question:

What is pornography?

“I might not be able to describe it succinctly — but I know it when I see it.”

And so does everyone else…


And how effective is this measure for discrimination?

We can see that in this next story of applied cultural corruption and discriminatory segregation that seeps into society and community by the leadership of the hated left as a measure of their deep state dominance…

This past Friday evening, the White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her family were kicked out of a rural Virginia, as Sanders and her family were eating dinner at the Red Hen Restaurant in Lexington, Virginia because the liberal lady  owner suffered from an acute case of TDS, and did not want to serve any Trump supporters.

This is what Sarah Sanders tweeted afterwards:

“Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so.”

Former Governor Mike Huckabee tweeted out that “bigotry was on the menu” at the little liberal Red Hen restaurant, and he continues: “It wasn’t enough for restaurateur of The Red Hen, Stephanie Wilkinson to humiliate and kick Sarah Sanders and her family out of the establishment.”

Governor Mike Huckabee told Laura Ingraham on her radio show Monday: “Stephanie Wilkinson followed Sarah Sanders and her family across the street to harass them at the other restaurant they went to!”

Laura Ingraham tweeted: “This restaurateur of The Red Hen Stephanie Wilkinson not only told @PressSec Sanders to leave–acc to @GovMikeHuckabee on my radio show today, she FOLLOWED Sanders’ family across the street to harass them at the other restaurant they went to!.”

Others piped in: “That’s fine if they don’t want her there — I wouldn’t want to eat anywhere that they don’t want me — but if u were gay, or a democrat, and they did that to  you, the owner would get sued!”

Laura Ingraham tweeted again: “Ironic, as @GovMikeHuckabee just noted, that @PressSec Sanders’ in-laws are liberals and not fans of @realDonaldTrump — well, now they know how radical the Dem Party has become.”

Someone else said on a tweet: “God always steps in at just the right time. Sarah Sanders’ democratic liberal in-laws had to experience demonism…”

And of course the surface similarity between the “Red Hen” deranged resto owner’s debacle, and the Masterpiece Cakeshop case have drawn all sorts of heated heckling and strained comparisons, amongst the many sides who are pointing out that just a few weeks ago, Democrats and progressives were firmly against businesses being able to deny service to certain customers.

Yet for now, the leftist along with the TDS afflicted Antifa folks fired back, that Trump staffers and Trump supporters, aren’t a protected class in the way racial and sexual minorities are. The whole vitriolic exchange, has led to some twisted rationalizations and position shifts on this issue, as the so called leftist progressives pretend like there’s no connection between desegregation, civil rights, and the rights of association — as are shown in this case — versus those rights involving the gay wedding cake’s Christian baker civil trial discourse.

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 11.53.53 AM

Everyone in the mainstream mass media is behaving as you might expect, united at least in their commitment to make this non-issue into a national referendum. But the bottom line is that things like the Red Hen banning Sarah Sanders incident, have already become commonplace, as I can personally attest with the recent and multiple attacks that I’ve experienced by many disparate leftist people like an Office space landlord, Capital One Cafe, the Museum of Flight, WeWork, MeetUp, Chase Bank, and many other places of business where Leftist snowflakes who have lost their minds since Trump became President — happen to work and think that their job are to wage war against fellow Americans and to segregate the country based on their political bias and belief system…

And it is perhaps restaurants more than any other place, amongst those that used to be considered the safe heaven for segregation, and this is where the Hillary people think that they should be making their last stand.

So, let’s set the Maxine Waters DemonRats on the war-path, to make the local restaurants their Alamo, because there are far too many loser libtards running the various eateries, since they couldn’t get a more intelligent and demanding job, so they opted to wing it by waiting tables with the help of illegal aliens dishing out the delicacies in the back infernal kitchen. Sorry but this is the reality of the restaurant business, since all the kitchens are full of “South of the Border” illegals — no matter what kind of cuisine the restaurant might serve upfront — the kitchen staff speak Spanish amongst themselves, and are cooking Mexican juevos for lunch and dinner.

So they can simply say “No Juevos” to all Americans, to all Whites, to all English speaking people, to all the Caucasian looking, and the well dressed females, the married women, all happy children, and generally to all credit card paying customers — and be done with it for good.

And thus we shall all regress back to the apartheid era that existed before the Civil Rights movement erased the infamy of segregation and hate — but where we are going now with the DemonRats at the help of that clattering train of Death & Destruction for our country.

Screen Shot 2018-06-25 at 12.55.03 PM

Enjoy this vision of Hell in America, and hope that the Red Hen restaurant owner and the low IQ person Maxine Waters, get full credit for ushering this old era of Segregation upon us all over again.

We shall all have to go back to our kitchens and start cooking our own dinner, all over again, and we shall reclaim the notion of entertaining in our own homes… And that ladies & gentlemen, might just be the silver lining in this dismal cloud of Segregation rearing it’s ugly head in American all over again thanks to the nasty Democrats and the sore losers of the Not-Crooked Hillary.

And since the vast majority of restaurants couldn’t pick out the particular Christian conservatives, or the Trump friends and supporters, or even the administration officials, or the Right wing and GOP Congress people, and Conservative Senators, from a line-up of Democratic party Hillary supporters — it seems rather likely that we will be seeing the restaurants, segregating people and limiting their customer base to ideologically leftist only persons, by asking everyone entering a restaurant to sign a pledge of Allegiance to the MADAME PRESIDENT (NOT CROOKED) HILLARY CLINTON, before anyone is allowed to see a hostess or to get seated — let alone be allowed to see a menu, or receive a glass of water…

Welcome to the KKK origins of the Southern Democratic party of the Plantation politics.

Now pass that neck chain and the yoke that we should all wear from here on after… when we show up in a  restaurant in order to be served, since Free People are not entitled to food in a liberal leftist shithole eatery like the Red Hen.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: