Bleeding Edge

SpyGate

This book details the evidence and the reasons behind the recently failed Coup D’Etat against the American Democracy.
============

“This is the most important existential threat that our country has faced since the inception of this Republic” —Dr Churchill
============

This Book was written by Dr Pano Churchill
Copyright 2018
=========
Chapter Twenty

“Iustitiae Dei”

President Trump was Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize by Norwegian Lawmakers yesterday…

U.S. President Donald Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in reaching an agreement to work toward de-nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

The U.S. leader was nominated by two members of Norway’s governing Progress Party, according to state broadcaster NRK. The deadline for this year’s prize passed in January, so this nomination would make him eligible for next year.

Nominations for the world’s most coveted prize are open to lawmakers, academics and researchers from around the world. The Nobel Committee in Oslo typically receives hundreds of nominations each year, and past candidates have also included Russian President Vladimir Putin and Former Cuban leader Fidel Castro. A record 330 people were nominated this year.

While the Norwegian Nobel committee is appointed by parliament, it’s decisions are independent. Trump was nominated by two right-wing members of Norway’s Progress Party, which advocates for limited immigration and for lower taxes.

Progress Party member Per-Willy Amundsen said this:
“What’s going on now is historic. A process is underway to ensure world peace in the future. It’s a fragile process, but we must of course do what we can to help this process bring good results.”

Now wanting to get the Nobel Peace prize to Trump for that summit in Singapore is over and done with — we must turn to President Donald Trump who is on his way back home to the White House…

Right about now, one can cue the start of another round of mass media talking-heads chattering loudly about the state of his preparedness. Indeed since this was one of the media’s favorite subjects going into the Tuesday Summit in Singapore — one must ask this:

Did Donald Trump do his homework?

Was he really prepared?

Asking this might seem somewhat silly, as if President Trump was supposed to be reading a huge binder marked “North Korea” under a desk lamp in the wee hours of the morning like it was a SAT study guide, cramming for his meeting with Kim Jong Un.

In reality this study’s vast majority was outsourced to aides and foreign policy experts, of the State Department and of the office of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in the same way that it’s always been under any other administration of the past, as well.

Rest assured, however, that Donald Trump has actually been preparing for this summit for decades — and he had intensified his boning up ever since North Korea’s nuclear ambitions became apparent. In fact that statement is borne out also by a video that’s been popping up on social media these past few days, seemingly as a rejoinder to the preparedness issue.

Take a look, for instance, at this “Meet the Press” appearance from 1999, in which Trump outlined his thoughts on Pyongyang’s nuclear plans:

Speaking about North Korea, Trump said that “these people in three or four years, they’re going to have nuclear weapons, they’re going to have those weapons pointed all over world and specifically at the United States.”

“The biggest problem this world has is nuclear proliferation,” he continued. “We have a country out there in North Korea which is sort of wacko, which is not a bunch of dummies. They are going out and developing nuclear weapons. And they’re not doing it because they’re having fun doing it.

And wouldn’t it be good to sit down and really negotiate something — and ideally negotiate? Now, if that negotiation doesn’t work, you’d better solve the problem now than solve it later.”

Trump also criticized former President Jimmy Carter’s efforts in North Korea at the time, and shot back at then – “Meet the Press” host Tim Russert’s contention that the fallout from using military force against the North would engulf Southeast Asia in fallout, contending that a strike would be better than a nuclear North Korea.

However, first and foremost, he said that he would negotiate the hell out of it…

Also in 1999, Trump sat down for an interview with Wolf Blitzer on a wide range of issues. This is dedicated to those of you who weren’t around then, or who may have forgotten — was when he was considering a presidential run with Ross Perot’s Reform Party before it slipped into squabbling and terminal doom.

They also discussed North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, with Trump saying that “We’d better do something rather quickly with them, and, hopefully, through negotiations.”

Blitzer asked what would happen “if the North Koreans don’t play ball, develop a nuclear capability, go forward with their missile development — does the United States act unilaterally?”

“If spoken to correctly — correctly — they will play ball,” Trump predicted.

This interview, mind you, was less than a year before then President Bill Clinton decided that trying to broker a peace deal with the North Koreans should take a backseat to Middle East peace negotiations. That was a gambit that proved to be fruitless in the end and didn’t provide Clinton with the signature peace plan he wanted.

“I had a chance at the end of my presidency — I kind of regret this now, but I would do the same thing again if faced with it — to end their missile program, but I would have had to go to North Korea,” Clinton said in a recent “Today” interview.

“But I couldn’t do that and finish the Middle East peace,” Billy the Kid told interviewer Craig Melvin. “And Arafat begged me not to go and then backed out on his promise.”

Melvin didn’t ask a follow-up question about Clinton’s preparedness, for whatever reason. And nobody seems to have asked the same questions about Kim Jong Un, as “Dilbert” creator Scott Adams noted: “After all, Kim may have read “The Art of the Deal,” but he certainly didn’t write it.”

Perhaps, we ought to look at the other side of the table in this equation to find the facts, because as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said, the US will give no sanctions relief until North Korea completely denuclearises, contradicting Pyongyang’s North Korean state media which had claimed (for reasons of purely local consumption) that President Donald Trump offered to lift the sanctions ahead of the total denuclearization.

Indeed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha attended the joint news conference at the Foreign Ministry in Seoul, South Korea and said the exact opposite…

Secretary of state Mike Pompeo said North Korea will not see any sanctions relief until the country denuclearises, undercutting Pyongyang’s suggestion that Donald Trump had agreed to ease economic restrictions.

The top US diplomat clarified America’s position as he conferred with South Korean and Japanese officials after Mr Trump’s high-stakes met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in a high-stakes effort to convince Mr Kim to scrap his country’s nuclear programme.

After that meeting, North Korean state media said Mr Trump had agreed to lift economic sanctions. But Mr Pompeo shot down that claim, signaling that America would continue to hew to its “maximum pressure” campaign of choking sanctions until Pyongyang had verifiably dismantled its arsenal.

“We are going to get denuclearisation”, Mr Pompeo said, adding that “only then will there be relief from the sanctions.”

A joint statement released by Mr Trump and Mr Kim after their meeting pledged that North Korea would “work toward complete denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula”. Mr Pompeo said he expected North Korea to take steps towards denuclearisation over the remainder of Mr Trump’s current four-year term.

Administration officials credit a concerted international effort to isolate North Korea and stifle its economy as a key factor in bringing Pyongyang to the negotiating table.

While the Trump administration has rejected the notion of imminently lifting sanctions, Mr Trump offered a key concession in saying America would suspend joint military exercises that the North has long denounced as a prelude to an invasion.

South Korean officials who met with Mr Pompeo hailed the summit for bringing the world back from the brink of potential armed conflict. President Moon Jae-in said the meeting helped shift “from the era of hostility towards the era of dialogue, of peace and prosperity”.

Donald Trump says North Korea will ‘dismantle missile test site’ as America and its allies insist that any nuclear deal must entail complete and verifiable destruction of Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons. In the months leading up to the summit, North Korea threatened the world with a series of bellicose statements as well as tests of ballistic missiles and a powerful hydrogen bomb.

Now we all must admit that the President Donald Trump is killing it… as he keeps negotiating well past the deal signing, as he should.

Of course now, if you even listen to the mass media stories for a minute, you would have to ask yourself the question: Whom is he killing? The snowflakes and buttercups whose heads explode to the mere mention of Trump’s name.

Is Trump Derangement Syndrome a real thing, or what the mass media haters and exploding leftist socialist heads are telling you that Donald Trump and the GOP are filled with white supremacists bent on destroying our country?

Or the alternative reality that “The Donald” is a Russian agent planted here in Brooklyn New York, that hotbed of Russian dissenters, many decades ago as a “sleeper” who has now been awakened — is real?

Or maybe the reality is the best Russia-Russia witch hunt theory of them all — the special one that both Rachel Maddow fans, and Star Wars fans, find equally appealing, and that is the theory that has not been debunked yet, that President Trump is really a Vulcan with green blood coursing through his alien being veins.

This last theory is causing Star Wars fans heads to explode in unison with the leftist socialist Rachel and her fans heads, so it must be the correct theory about President Trump’s origins.

And for the rest of the sad sacks that say that Trump is killing America — we’ve got another thing coming, because methinks that the Democrats are the ones killing America by turning it into a massive nanny state modeled on the Southern plantation system — and right about now, all they are trying to do is to keep people tied-up and hemmed-in the bondage of mental slavery.

Indeed the true history of the Democratic Party and it’s illiberal totalitarian DNA, goes back to its foundation within the hugely racist and separatist antebellum South. Even before the modern-day Democratic Party was founded around 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world’s oldest political party — the Southern Slaveholding Plantation masters were calling themselves Democrats as a rebuke of levity against the very Democracy they despised.

Suffice to say that the Democrat Planters of the US espoused the Black American people’s right to vote only as three fifths of a man all the way up to the 1950s…

And this harkens back to the “Three-Fifths Compromise” which was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787, had unanimously accepted the principle that representation in the House of Representatives would be in proportion to the relative state populations. However, since slaves could not vote, leaders in slave states would thus have the benefit of increased representation in the House and the Electoral College. Delegates opposed to slavery proposed that only free inhabitants of each state be counted for apportionment purposes, while delegates supportive of slavery, on the other hand, opposed the proposal, wanting slaves to count in their actual numbers.

The proposal was debated on July 11th and initially, the concept of counting by a 3/5ths ratio was voted down by the members present at the Convention. A few southern delegates, seeing an opportunity, then proposed full representation for their slave population. Seeing that the states could not remain united without some sort of compromise measure, the ratio of 3/5ths was brought back to the table and agreed to.

After a contentious debate, the compromise that was finally agreed upon—of counting “all other persons” as only three-fifths of their actual numbers—reduced the representation of the slave states relative to the original proposals, but improved it over the Northern position. An inducement for slave states to accept the Compromise was its tie to taxation in the same ratio, so that the burden of taxation on the slave states was also reduced.

The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, which reads:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

Thus we can clearly see how the three-fifths ratio originated with the 1783 amendment proposed to the Articles of Confederation. The amendment was to have changed the basis for determining the wealth of each state, and hence its tax obligations, from real estate to population, as a measure of ability to produce wealth.

Whether, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state’s total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count 3 out of every 5 slaves as a person for this purpose. Its effect was to give the southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally, thus allowing the slaveholder interests to largely dominate the government of the United States until 1861.

Back in the 16th and 17th century and certainly all the way up to and 1860s the slaveholding elite of the Democratic party had devised the plantation system as a means of organizing labor and political support. It was a mini welfare state, a cradle to grave system that bred dependency and punished any urge to independence. This model impressed northern Democrats, inspiring the political machines that traded government handouts for votes from ethnic immigrant blocs.

Today’s Democrats have expanded to a multiracial plantation of ghettos for blacks, barrios for Latinos, and reservations for Native Americans. That is the full byproduct of the Jacksonian Democratic purges of the Indian natives marched into reservations, and all others hemmed in to similarly sequestered ghettos. Add to that all the black males that are penned inside the barbed wire concentration camps that are the modern jails, and those are also the maximum sentencing incarcerated populations that are coerced by the Democrats in order to “bring them to heel” and thus place all the black males inside the prison system, and thus increase the dependency of the black families to the government for their daily bread — since the family’s breadwinner is already incarcerated.

Today in America is is only the Whites, the Mulattos, and the Whitties, along with the recent immigrants from AngloSaxon Western Civilization countries who are the only “holdouts” resisting full dependency on the government’s dole, and so they are blamed for the bigotry and for the racial exploitation that is actually perpetrated by the Leftist Socialist Democrats of todays’ planter class.

Yours,

Dr Churchill

PS:

The shocking story of the Democratic Party’s dark past and slave plantation origins, explains the roles of Democratic idolized figures like Andrew Jackson, Van Buren, FDR and LBJ, and exposes the hidden truth that pure Racism comes not from the conservative Right, but rather from the traditional Democrats and from their socialist democratic left (so called progressives), of today’s Democratic party…

To my beloved Democrat friends I have this to ask:

Do you accept the fact that your party is still seeking slaves?

How long will it take you to wake up to that fact?

After knowing all this now, how can you live like a Slave any longer?

That’s all.